[Hearthstone] There Is Another Type of Shaman
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
- Review & gameplay of the most entertaining Shaman deck I’ve ever made.
Get Awesome Games ► www.G2A.com/r/k...
My Stream ► / nl_kripp
● Twitter / kripparrian
● Instagram / casualkripp
● Kripp Store www.designbyhum...
Watch another Kripp video!
The Sad State of Alarm-o-Bots ► bit.ly/alarmobots
How Good Is Undercity Huckster? ► bit.ly/undercit...
The Nerfs Have Arrived! ► bit.ly/hearthst... - เกม
![[Hearthstone] Mage Slayer Warrior](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0HzMlrjwFX4/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] Mage Slayer Warrior](/img/tr.png)
![[Hearthstone] RandoMage Is Surprisingly Good!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jSja0I6HCvw/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] Reno Dragon Shaman Is Amazing](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VO5wI9zqrr8/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Hearthstone] How Good Is Fandral Staghelm?](/img/n.gif)
The type of Shaman that is actually hunter and isn't forced to play a three drop on turn five.
nah you kinda begged it Corag...
usualy shaman on turn 4 palaying 6,5 mana card
Oh shit guys, I just noticed that I messed up. I wanted to write turn five not four.
11:07 opponent missed lethal feral rage for four damage plus one more arcane missiles instead of crazed worshipper would have been dead kripperino
well spotted!
well played actually
Kirpp also misplayed at around 15:17 if he was going to swing weapon into his face why not the taunt and get four damage
ianatron2023 He actually noted he misplayed there though
Searing Flamer Yes I know
Hey, this shaman deck is pretty good!
Why would you do this?
wtf XD
WHY IDUPZ!?
Preeeeweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeety gud
kek to the max
2:27
You are a goderino among menerino
On point today!
Early
He's here already !
How much does the Kripp pay you to do this?
1:35 "I wanted to highlight the Dragon Aspects..." - Doesn't have a single Dragon Aspect in his deck.
(Yes, I know that's not what he meant)
I thought that exact thing after he said that :P
Blackwing Corruptor and Chillmaw
Philip T wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/Dragon_Aspects
This was the point of my joke.
same
Don Korb oh, nerd.
Looks like once again, 1 hp mattered.
got 29 problems but leroy aint one
Sure, you don't have to play a hyper-aggressive tempo-based shaman or Zoo. You can play this highly specific decklist, oooor that another super-speicifc decklist. Provided you have these specific legendary and epic cards. After all, you can play any class you want! If you have an immense collection of cards and have these specific overpowered legendaries.
If this doesn't prove my point I don't know what does Hearthpwn, I really don't.
What's your point?
mjmlnw1993 No? The point is that agrro decks are popular not just because they work, but also because they require minimal investment of money, time and effort. While anything that isn't aggro requires very specific legendaries, a lot of effort and skill AND luck on top of it to work.
Like I'm sorry, but this a free to play game, I should not be required to invest this much into it if I want to actually have fun with it instead of playing boring, mindless agrro-grind.
Funnest I had in hearthstone was playing Control Warrior before I owned a single legendary. It is very hard without owning Grom, but it is possible.
Havent spend anything on HS. .. And here i sit watching all these decks i wanna play but cant since i dont have the legendaries. So.. I am doing it the aggro way since i cannot do it any other way. I would love to have all these legendaries too but i dont wanna spend money on a free to play game so ihavent. Aggro works fine ^^ You who spend money on this game and loosing vs aggros.. "Ha-Ha!"
Hey there are many decks that require minimal dust but are still playable successfull. You just keep proving me aggro and zoo players are tards. Pick the first deck you see that require minimal skill>play it everyday, everygame>still defend this Hearthstone cancer.
Dear Kripp, Yesterday i finally gave into the insanity and retired nzoth paladin, i now main face shaman and i must say it is much easier to smorc than to think about what youre going to do. Unfortunately i have come across a problem. I dont always start off with tunnel trogg, totem golem, and feral spirits in my hand and i figured that i must be doing something wrong. Any tips on how to fix this problem???
You pray to RNGesus 5 times a day and ask for forgiveness. How dare you play a deck that requires skill it's all about RNG.Repent sinner Repent.
Well zoolock is more affective if you want early game but seriously just get original don't complain on the 3rd best deck in the game
well I think this is meant to be Ironic xD
but when i play nzoth paladin pyromancer concecration tirion and sylvanas are usually the bottom 6 cards of my deck
You acknowledge the fact that everything is mostly emptiness and quantum fluctuations and brace the fact that we all are connected. After that you must succumb to the fact that you are an opponent who doesn't play control therefore you must have the divine starter of trogg, golem, golem, coin and flamewreathed whilst your ally in humanity suffers from the lack of presence on board and of removal.
Shaman? Is this a pet or something?
investing
its something viable, if that means anything to you
ROASTED
If you play this deck a lot you can get me in gold!
I'LL FOLLOW YOU, WHEREVER YOU GO
Fucking roleplayers
KRIPPERINOS GET IN HERE
This comment is gold
+MagmaRagerino Kripperino but there is nothing like a golden guerilla
The expression of his luck at 21:46 was priceless
0:04 - [Talkerino]
2:26 - in case you were wondering
4:03 - barely holding on
13:11 - the combos
Loving this deck so far, I always loved the Control Shaman archetype.
Missed lethal on the last clip. You had it with hero power, lava shock, rock biter, and him fatiguing.
Rank is just a number and mine is 21
Rip
nice profile pic, megumin
David Kommar Yes I love explosions
+goodperson656 I bet you are one of the people who think hs is all luck and takes no skill. Then why are you at such a low rank?
I know you! You've commented on a cover of the battle theme from FF5! Stop be so dorky
0:48 I prefer to play against rush decks than control Warrior. Win or lose at least it happens this year.
Lolz are you in a fucking hurry somewhere? If so, dont play the game. If no, then stop bitching about long games and have fun.
mjmlnw1993 I don't like wasting time against people who play out 8 turns on a definite loss. Control Warriors are a special kind of evil.
some people dont have fun playing to fatigue every game. In fact everyone has times where they dont want to play tank-up warrior i believe.
For sure. Against control warrior I just concede. No one wants 20 minute games.
+Joseph Muela id rather a 20 minute game of tactics and trading, as opposed to a 2 min game going face, ignoring everything else
"Shaman Healing is very poor" has one of the best heals in the game.
Only if you build you deck around it. It would be terrible in midrange.
Changing 1 or 2 cards doesn't brick a deck, infact, it's encouraged to change cards for different matchups even among meta decks. Healing wave is RIDICULOUS against certain matchups, and Hallazeal only taking up one slot in a deck, which usually runs damage spells/clear, pretty insane situational cards.
Jordan Shirley If you want to win jousts, you have to add in a good bit of late game cards. You cannot achieve that if you are playing Mid-range or aggro shaman, the 2 most popular shamans right now.
You said yourself, the 2 most popular shamans, which means they have the same cards as you, which means you have an equal chance to win a joust against them, not to mention, the point I was making is that Kripp said "Shamans have the worst healing".
+Jordan Shirley a joust that ties does not count as a win, so you have a slightly less than 50% chance to win the joust against a mirror. Shamans have the worst healing because more than half the time you are paying 3 mana to heal 7. That is worse than healing touch which is not played at all. On the other hand, if you build a top heavy deck(most likely control), then healing wave is borderline broken.
It's pretty cool seeing all these cards coming together to make this deck it sucks that half of it will rotate out soon :(
I applaud you just for making new decks and not playing the usual net decks.
Then again, I do think that you are one of the big trend makers when it comes to the meta.
21:45 I know it didn't matter in this case, but you missed lethal. Rockbiter, lavashot, and hero power face into 3 fatigue dmg.
PLOT TWIST, SKIPPERINO KRIPPERINO IS KRIPP
I see useless and unfunny dorks like Magmaragerino and Coreragerino but i don't see KrippeReno Jacksonino.
SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!
cmon dude magmaragerino isn't that bad
Giant Zombie they got old
Magnaragerino is dedicates like skipp.
We're gonna be richerino.
+KrippeReno Jacksonino LOL
There is indeed another type of shaman: Concede Shaman, the oldest of them all.
Nice to see someone using Charged Hammer, when I first saw it I thought it looked really cool and much like Ragnaros in that tavern brawl. Only problem is that it is quite slow, still an interesting weapon that can change how you play Shaman completely.
22:01 To watch the Warlock concede. ❤
I was excited for a moment and thought that the second opponent was wowhobbs, but he spells his name in game as Hobbs without the extra e.
This kind of videos is why I watch kripp! Please, give us some more of this deck!
That last match was pretty sick
Kripp's definition of "EVER" is "last week"
15:14 So attack the totem with the minion because Kripp's afraid of taking face dmg Pogchamp.
Boring deck, no cards that are REAL fun.
you know what is fun ? hunter's hero power pew pew
21:03 should've traded one Leeroy into Wrathguard
nope, if he traded one leeroy into the wrathguard he would've missed 3 damage from the hellfire. The way he played it maximised the damage he had in his hand.
wannes drol But he took four and had lethal in hand with Hellfire. I'd argue assuming your opponent has no heal for 1-3 (because in case of 4+ heal, he loses anyway) and just making sure you don't die is a better play than what he did.
Another option would have been to copy Leeroy before PO, trade the PO Leeroy into Wrathguard and hit face for 16. That way your opponent has 4 HP left, but you end up with a 9/3 and a 6/2, while your opponent only has 4 Damage on Board.
+wannes drol thats actually pretty smart, nice read
Missed lethal at 21:44. Lava Shock + Rockbiter + Hero Power + Fatigue(3).
When Kripp said "he just topdecked holy nova against me", the priest I was playing against topdecked holy nova against me. There is a connection.
That warlock combo deck was pretty cool.
lmao the end of that last duel was so fucking compelling. dude used reno, then alexstrasza on you only for you to reno, then dropped everything he had to deal 29 face damage in a single turn only for you to heal it all back with TWO healing waves, just pushed so hard to the point where all he had left was hellfire + doomsayer and could only stall while taking fatigue damage. i guess you had some pretty good RNG, and hindsight is 20/20, but if he had paced things out a bit more in the mid game he might have stayed ahead. duels like this always end up going to the player who staggers his "answers," so he doesn't end up in a situation where he's faced with a huge threat when he has already exhausted all his answers on a lesser threat. or, sometimes it's okay to take a massive 15 damage when you have the cards to prevent it immediately as long as you can remove it the next turn, and that seems like a misplay while it's happening but a few turns later you realize that you saved the removal or taunt cards for a much bigger threat. like spectators are always going to think short term because they don't know how the duel ends. so when you're watching a duel real time, the ideal play always looks like whichever one optimizes the ratio between your HP & your opponent's HP, i.e. mitigates the most incoming damage and deals the most outgoing damage. but when you look back on a duel you realize you could have prevented a loss by choosing not to play certain cards that mitigated or dealt a lot of damage early on. in the moment, there's not really a way of accurately knowing when that might happen, but that's how RNG games always go, and if you look back on your losses you can see patterns.
it feels like you lose control when you "gamble" by not playing a card that seems perfect short term because you think it MIGHT save you long term, IF your opponent plays something and IF you draw no other answers. but you also gamble by playing the card just as much, you just don't realize it because you're only looking at the cards on the board and the cards your opponent might play in the next couple turns. if you're only thinking a couple turns ahead, you have a blind spot, and that blind spot tells you that you're playing rationally and mathematically and leaving relatively little up to chance. but you're leaving the whole long term game up to chance all the time. so no matter what you do, you're always just estimating probabilities (or just not caring and winging it) and playing according to those probabilities. when you intentionally do a short term "misplay" you're just estimating a high probability that your opponent will have a much more threatening board later on in the fight, and that this risk outweighs the risk of taking a lot of damage right now. and it also bears in mind that damage =/= loss. like if you win a game with 1 health, it doesn't matter how much health you lost during those mid game turns where you felt like you were losing. like if i can play something on turn 15 that will prevent me from going from 20 HP to 5 HP, it's going to seem like a huge misplay NOT to do it. but if i fast forward to turn 22 and i've still lost, maybe that's a good justification for taking the misplay next time i end up in a similar situation, so i can see where it actually would have gone if i "misplayed." taking 15 damage on turn 15 but winning on turn 27 is obviously still way better than avoiding 15 damage on turn 15 but losing on turn 22.
Malandramente, aquele first incocente, chegando na gente, só pra poder curtir!
Also, Happy B-Day Kripp (late =P)!
si si es muy bueno espanol americano kebap guacamole taco jajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajajaja
6 Seconds off-first.
2 Seconds off-second...
7 Seconds ahead of Skipperino!
m a l a n d r a m e n t e
Pare com esse tipo de meme. As pessoas vão ter impressões erradas dos brasileiros...
+Mateus Souza Eles já pensam que somos marginais que amam futebol.
Nem está tão longe da realidade pra ser honesto.
I actually found a deck that beats aggro shaman around 75% of the time...the problem is that it is face hunter in the wild format.
There are plenty of decks that beat it 75% of the time
***** Idk about that. My win rate is about 10% better in standard as face shaman than it is with any other deck.
That's just not true. Aggro Shaman and Zoolock can practically annihilate every single deck in the game right now.
+Josh Teixeira I dunno about you guys but my control warrior and C'thun warrior wreck face against aggro shamans and warlocks. I literally have only lost once to an aggro shaman and maybe twice or thrice against warlock.
Then you probably don't play a lot
Anyone imagining onyxia as a pharmacist ?YOU SHALL PAY FOR YOUR INSULINES
I'm kinda late but, anyway, 8:22 good choice Kripp, good choice....
17:20 Nef:Warlock,you play with magic beyound your understanding!!1!!
War:*Siphon Soul* omfg,shut up pls
Nef:abhabhhpshh...
I played against a version of this deck at rank 5 today that ran earth elemental + ancestral spirit. Pretty awesome combination honestly. If I didn't have two executes in my hand it probably would of been enough to tempo me out.
Aggro Shaman knows no Shaman but the Shaman of the face
The funniest thing about Kripp hating Aggro, is that the warrior class is the most prevalent class on ladder. Mana Crystals' live meta tracker has warrior average 22-25% of the meta at all ranks.
WAW dude I made a Renoshaman back when GvG and Naxx where still there, and I get to legend with it. Never though that Kripp would make a 20 similar cards deck oO' !
i was so sad that kripp didnt yogg before the guy conceded
21:40 is a missed lethal! Lava shock, rockbiter, heropower and then fatigue :o. 2+3+2+3=10
Onyxia evolve is pretty sweet, that might actually work with evolve shaman.
Oh hey. I literally just played against that Hobbes guy on ladder today as well. They were playing the same deck lol.
Warrior and Shaman seem to have the most diversity in play style right now...too bad we almost only ever see Face types from either.
There needs to be a "100% Winraterino Kripparino"
that last game - just wow
13:00 king krush would have been amazing
Ah, King Krush! My favorite card for a druid who can't put hunter cards in their deck to topdeck.
Beginning of video- 'season reset, so I'm playing a decent amount of high rank players' 18:05- 'rank 17 things'
kripp u do a good job at editing these vids
I know you mostly play HS but I noticed you were trying several different games as well. Would you do a video on Duelyst? I've been having such a blast with it! :D
Those really were some crazy ass games
I feel almost sad for that warlock at the end.
Well said Kripp.
I have played for a year and have not used a deck someone else has created yet.
(made legend and golden Druid in 5 weeks)
The fun for me is in the game play and I could really not care less about winning as long as I have a good time.
I think some amateurs take this card game way too seriously and take the fun out of it.
4:04 HOBBS!
Make sure you don't like guys!
here we go.. its that time again when kripp says look at this great deck and you make it and its trash.
21:06
One Hit Point Matters 3
You're sounding a little full of the cold man, feel better dude! Great video as ever
There is another type of Kripperino 0:00
Kripp actually made a Shaman deck without 4 mana 7/7.
Probably could have felt comfortable about a lot of things against that handlock. Off the top of my head, three pretty clear misplays:
1. Doesn't attack + Mortal Coil the Mana Tide Totem before playing Cult Apothecary. Given that he only needed to gain 6 health to top up, he didn't need it on the board for the battlecry, so drawing first is by far the better play.
2. Life Taps *after* playing Reno, despite having enough health to do it before.
3. Plays Cursed! before playing Dark Peddler. Yet another case of taking definitive actions before drawing random cards, which is a rookie mistake.
4. After that, Life Taps as his last action for the turn.
5. Alpha strikes you without lethal, allowing you a 14 health heal.
6. Doesn't attack one of his Leeroys into your demon, despite there being absolutely no drawback to doing so.
Really, that guy was awful. :-S
Pretty sure I made up this deck style minus dragons a couple weeks ago and been running it every day since.
That last game was epic!
i swear kripp and amaz uploads at the same time
9 p.m. cest :P
or 3 p.m. est
I just watched a 5 minute bubble soccer add, now THAT's some good marketing
Somebody needs to make a bobblehead of this Joker.
Can we all just take a moment to admire how monumentally stupid that Ragnaros play was? They took a 50/50 shot at losing Rag to potentially save a 4/2, in terms of raw risk-reward reasoning that might actually be the worst play I've ever seen.
Kripp looks like Oberyn Martell from Game of Thrones... minus the smashed in head.
Well played games, very nice deck.
This actually seems like a fun deck, btw do you actively play the new Runescape Legends game or was it just the video? was wondering if you would make videos about it some point as well as at least I am interested in the mechanics and strategies of that game (btw the dungeoneering feels really difficult compared to arena even)
"shaman healing is very poor" -Kripparian, 2016
You forgot to add in the leeroy burst combo
So this is the control coz aggro and mid are already there?
"Shaman healing is poor" Heals 14 health for 3 mana twice in 1 game
Y'shaarj overload shaman with lots of overload minions, whose large body for their mana cost makes the average outcome of the y'shaarj pull very good. Dropping y'shaarj and Fetching an earth elemental feels good. =w=
THE BASIC SHAMAN
The problem with non-aggro decks is that they take a really long time to ladder with. If you lose a match you've just thrown 10-15 minutes down the drain.
The amount of misplays in the last game was staggering
In 2 days in ranked I find 1 random class, then 4-5 mages (mostly ice mage or c'thun) in a row then another different class and then again 4-5 mages I hate them. always with those 20+ burst damage
oh no, here comes cold light shamen
any decent replacements for hallazeal and onyxia? :/
21:37 why didn't he played hellfire and next turn the leeroy combo :pp
What?
it would have caused the copied giant taunt to die, meaning he only would have gotten 20 damage
also the better play would have probably been to copy the giant taunt copy itself
Kripp didnt have the totem hero power tho
happy b day kripp hope u hit 1 mill soon
21:47 Missed lethal
"Shaman healing is really poor" ~Kripp 2016
awkward moment when he misses 2 damage for no reason at 15:20
0:48 I hear Game of Thrones melody...
You should play dog's combo shaman. Its super fun and pretty effective
talk to me when you have a fun 1-health minion only deck
There is another type of shaman and it turns out its preeeety good
10:00 no balls missed leathal
Couldn't agree more. Good video Kripp.
Still playing mill rogue down here at rank 15.
More of that awesome deck!