Testing on hard to see gold - E1500 & GPX6000
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
- Some more testing on the difficult to detect 0.085g piece of gold. How does the E1500 stack up against the small gold king GPX6000??
Product links to gear shown in this video:
phasetechnical...
phasetechnical...
phasetechnical...
phasetechnical...
To support this channel, please like, subscribe and leave a comment below.
If you have any questions on metal detecting, you can email me at:
nenad@phasetechnical.com.au
Thanks Nenad
Good honest vid Nenad.
I’ve seen and read a lot of info regarding auto+ no threshold vs manual (with threshold), but there is no mention of volume. You can’t run manual sensitivity with max volume, BUT you can with no threshold. I run auto+ (no threshold) with detector volume max and avantree torus neck speaker on max and it’s unbelievable what depth I have got when working a patch. Of course a lot comes into play from day to day emi, high mineralisation, your hearing etc. I have found a .4 at 11” and then a .1 at 9”!!!measured by taking out around an inch of dirt at a time. Even turning the detector volume down one notch and I would lose the signal which was only heard sweeping the coil in one direction only, and would balance out after 2-3 sweeps. Ground balance and the signal is there again. Just a very tiny repeatable chirp. You cannot compare a target with manual sensitivity and auto+ with the same volume. Auto+ (no threshold) has to have max volume on detector and external speaker. I use avantree torus speaker on max volume so I don’t know how it works with anything else. It doesn’t work just with detector speaker. I continue sometimes running manual on targets and have yet found nothing that that auto+ doesn’t pick up easily. Try it
@@AU-kid yes that all makes sense. Use what works and what you are comfortable/ confident with.
Mite be worth a try. What coil you running?
Gpx11. Would work with any coil I imagine.
Hi Nenad, great test mate
Honest test 👍
Thanks 👍
Thanks Nenad / Looking forward to the reviews of the NF 12x7" 5 pin prototype coil that Maurice Coppola has used, should be a winner for sure.
Yeah I've used the older 12x7" Advantage on the E1500 and that's a great match. A newer version would be most welcome.
gracias buen video
Great Video, I’ve just ordered a 1500 & eagerly awaiting its delivery, I have a phase tec sp01 from my older machine, would you recommend running this on the new 1500 ?
Cheers
Daz
Sorry Steel phase sp01
@@Dazv07 yes you can do. Gives you a lot more control over the audio.
Thanks for sharing good info
No worries. Thanks for watching and leaving a comment.
With the Algo, were you on ultra fine or fine gold?
I think the Algo is pretty good. It’s not going to break new ground over the 6000 though. I think for the price it’s well worth its money.
There is a bit of bullshit being said by resellers of its depth capabilities though. You have tested, I have tested and we are getting similar results. Then someone will like double the depth that we are seeing and done, new users want to believe that, as you would. Be honest guys.
Ultra Fine. Depth is a tricky one, as there's so many variables. I'll let people do their own testing on that or let the videos do the talking.
@@diggingwithphasetech people can’t do their own testing prior to purchasing. That’s why we need to show the reality of what is the likely expectation. Of course, different ground, different coils will bring in variables. But a reseller saying to a potential buyer, it can detect to 500mm.
.
Honesty is everything in this industry. With a 15 or 16" NF, I can air test an aussie 5c at 33 cm. Lightness, ground handling, sensitivity, adjustability and price are its strong points.
@@diggingwithphasetechSo would it detect a 1 Oz nugget at 50cm?
@@Gardener7 It's not a deep machine for bigger targets, I think that would be beyond its limits.
The coiltech is a lot sharper for sure
Got a few scrubby areas where I'd like to give it a swing. Might be a bit easier to poke around compared to the 11".
I would be very interested to see which is better at detecting a big chunk at 50cm or more.
@@Gardener7 The 6000 will likely do better on bigger deeper. Depending on what you mean by big chunk though, a 7000 or 5000 will likely outdo the 6000. BennyProspector has a good video on a range of bigger targets.
@@diggingwithphasetech I was wondering if this E1500 would miss deeper targets, even if they are big nuggets.
Gold monster would give it a run for its money on the first nugget.
Probably. High Freq VLF units excel on that type of gold, but mineralisation is always the opposing factor. They can't punch through high iron soils like Pulse Induction units can.