Estonian Soldier reacts to F-15

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
  • Rohje Watch:
    www.rohje.com/...
    F-15:
    • F-15 Eagle - One of th...
    Estonian Soldier Hat, Estonian TH-camr Cup:
    artur-rehi.mys...
    Become a patron of the channel (Hero, Legend and God tiers get rewards)
    / arturrehi
    Estonian Soldier DISCORD IS LIVE:
    discord.gg/arturrehi
    You can send me post to
    Kalevi 47-3A, Tartu, Estonia 51010
    Estonian TH-camr Subreddit:
    / estonianyoutuber
    My facebook page:
    / arturehi
    Videos I have done about Estonia:
    • Estonian culture
    Check out my music:
    • Video
    Until my next video
    Stay cool my friends!
    Bye bye!

ความคิดเห็น • 1.5K

  • @PopePlatinumBeats
    @PopePlatinumBeats 4 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    i got the cup... i need the hat

    • @FaZekiller-qe3uf
      @FaZekiller-qe3uf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hat competition

    • @6footsuzuki337
      @6footsuzuki337 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol I need the hat 2

    • @ZachAttack8
      @ZachAttack8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Get the cup and the hat and you'll become a god

    • @sgtjarhead99
      @sgtjarhead99 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      LOL. I want that rifle he's always got in the background.

    • @ryanbroguy
      @ryanbroguy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you ever get the hat?

  • @aclosson8193
    @aclosson8193 4 ปีที่แล้ว +400

    The F-15 has one distinction no other fighter has. It is the only fighter to have fired an air to space missile and taken out a satellite.

    • @maryjoygelizon4268
      @maryjoygelizon4268 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Whos satelite did the f15 take out?

    • @mpfiveO
      @mpfiveO 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      mary joy gelizon one of our own, it had aged out, and it’s orbit was decaying. So it was used as a target for an Air Launched Anti-Satellite missile

    • @aclosson8193
      @aclosson8193 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      One of our own. The satellite was old and obsolete so it was used to test the air to space missile tech. The missile worked as designed.

    • @zevailes
      @zevailes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      America!

    • @clintatk
      @clintatk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      That made the Russians do a spit take! 😂😂

  • @warriorpanda100
    @warriorpanda100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +253

    14:40 I think he missed the fact that the plane hit the helicopter with a BOMB. Not a missile, A BOMB.

    • @sovietrussia1278
      @sovietrussia1278 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yeah crazy

    • @Petalslash
      @Petalslash 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      what I was gonna say lol.

    • @talltale9760
      @talltale9760 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      At night btw

    • @chadhagans6687
      @chadhagans6687 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Precision Weapon isn’t a lie & this was 30+ years ago. When I was in Afghanistan the Air Force had a squadron of F15 or F16s made up completely of female pilots (call sign “dude”). They didn’t give a shit, bad asses, coming in at 1000 feet above the bottom of the valley, easily 2000ft below the ridges. they would consistently drop laser guided ordinance with-in 5-10m of there designated targets. So hitting a flying helicopter is with-in capability’s as long as whoever is lazing it can stay on it.

    • @alexwalker2582
      @alexwalker2582 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Now that? That's just showing off.

  • @iTz_JLAR
    @iTz_JLAR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    "They should make one plane that does everything" ... Literally explains the entire F-35 program. 😂😂

    • @adamb8317
      @adamb8317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well he means multi role not multi branch. Like the F/A-18

    • @adamb8317
      @adamb8317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But yes the F-35 is also multi role.

    • @fulcrm4200
      @fulcrm4200 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@floofifoxalin wdym shit in air to air, sure, it can be outclassed in a straight up dogfight; but in bvr(beyond visual range) no chance mate.

  • @lorentzcoffin4957
    @lorentzcoffin4957 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The issue with generalist aircraft is that they sit in the middle ground of performance for their roles. Specialist aircraft tend to out perform them in every role.

  • @Darthsand21503
    @Darthsand21503 4 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    “I have to many F’s to give” love that 😂👌

  • @MrAlex_Raven
    @MrAlex_Raven 4 ปีที่แล้ว +172

    F-15, the one fighter that an Israeli pilot came back after during a fight or training exercise had one wing completely torn off. That is an awesome story to react to, the fighter that returned home with one wing missing.

    • @MrAlex_Raven
      @MrAlex_Raven 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah saw no one mention this story so I hope this gets a bump.

    • @woodintheblood4104
      @woodintheblood4104 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      That was an awesome video! Artur should react to that video, it would blow his mind!!!!

    • @aidendoesstuff185
      @aidendoesstuff185 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes someone told me that in discord

    • @BigDave423
      @BigDave423 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      This is the story. 😎👍
      th-cam.com/video/M359poNjvVA/w-d-xo.html

    • @theamericaneaglepatriot9673
      @theamericaneaglepatriot9673 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Solo wing pixy

  • @EnDSchultz1
    @EnDSchultz1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Look down, shoot down" capability just means the radar is able to filter out returns from the ground. IE, it's not about vibrations. The radar is able to tell if a returned signal is simply bouncing off the ground or if it's an aircraft.

  • @nealramsey4439
    @nealramsey4439 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The US has learned that designing a plane to be good at everything is neither the best nor great at any of them. If you want the best air to air then it can't be the best at ground attack. Look at the differences in the F-22 and the A-10. I don't think anyone says that the F-22 is the best at hitting ground targets nor would you say the same about the A-10 and air to air. This is why there has never been a one fighter does all. You can imagine that it's impossible to fly slow and carry large amounts of armament for ground attack and yet be fast and agile for air to air.

    • @HttVVHttCHHHtMtCotW
      @HttVVHttCHHHtMtCotW 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don’t think the US has learned that... Creating a do-it-all airframe was the entire point of the JSF program.

    • @hondascott996
      @hondascott996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And yet the dumbass bean counters think that the F-35 can replace the A-10. Ask a foot soldier which one they want loitering above.

    • @adamb8317
      @adamb8317 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Although the A-10 can actually dogfight and carries air to air missiles often. Plus the massive cannon.

  • @Russellsperry
    @Russellsperry 4 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    The F stands for “fighter”, and we have a lot more of them!

    • @susanmaggiora4800
      @susanmaggiora4800 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Russell Sperry Yep. F for ‘fighter’ and B for ‘bomber’

    • @Echidna23Gaming
      @Echidna23Gaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@susanmaggiora4800 A for "attacker"? I know we have the A-10 but we used to have a lot more A planes in world war 2

    • @Tigerskunk
      @Tigerskunk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Echidna23Gaming yes A is for Attack mainly meaning ground attack. Such as A-10 or mixed use like F/A-18, A/C-130. Back in WW 2 , they didn't use the F, A, C, destination till later in the after the war.

    • @SDTimmy23
      @SDTimmy23 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      E Robinson so then what is the C for?

    • @PiousSlayer
      @PiousSlayer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@SDTimmy23
      I'd say Cargo. I haven't looked it up in a long time though. I recommend google.
      Edit: Woohoo I remembered it!
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1962_United_States_Tri-Service_aircraft_designation_system
      Edit - under Designation tab.

  • @Winters1234
    @Winters1234 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    The Navy’s, F-18 can do Air-Air, Air-Ground and anti-ship with the Harm and various other weapons

    • @Tigerskunk
      @Tigerskunk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe the F-18 have all been updated/replaced and are now F/A-18. Better engines and newer electronics.

    • @anthonycochran6492
      @anthonycochran6492 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The HARM is a anti radar missile, it's right in the acronym. I assume you are referring to the Harpoon Anti-Ship missile.

    • @boss_acg
      @boss_acg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Tigerskunk they were always
      F/A 18. People just never say it right. It's a fighter/attack. The newer version you're thinking of is the F/A 18 Super hornet. Its bigger and the engines are more powerful and it has 11 weapon stations vs 9 on the legacy hornet.

    • @Tigerskunk
      @Tigerskunk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@boss_acg thanks for the update. I was just going by memory. Been awhile since going to any airshows.

    • @Kirinketsu_
      @Kirinketsu_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and F/A-18 are meant to be replaced with F-35C, they already cut the F/A-18 production

  • @jv6miata
    @jv6miata 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My dad was an avionics tech on f-15s for the USAF for 20 years before he retired. When i was a kid i went to a school on base and before work I’d get to hang out in his maintenance hanger and play on their xbox that they had and they’d show me around the f15s they were fixing. Today he still works on them and he’s allowed to take me on the flightline of once of the biggest AFB’s in the country. I saw f22’s, f16s, f35s, and f15 E’s launching and flying all within an hour. I’m proud to say my dad is one of the coolest guys i know and his job is wicked awesome.

  • @airynvath
    @airynvath 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    F-16 is another great plane, that was one of my favorites

    • @cgt3704
      @cgt3704 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      My country has so many f 16s right now

    • @airynvath
      @airynvath 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@cgt3704 Nice!!!!!

    • @susanmaggiora4800
      @susanmaggiora4800 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Claudiu Toea They’re good planes!

    • @richneedre48
      @richneedre48 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup and F-A18 SUPER hornet✌👍

    • @pillager6190
      @pillager6190 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I live near the Airbase where foreign pilots came to train. Before everyone got used to the new terrain following radar they crashed so many were started calling them "LAWN DARTS" (Google them, dangerous toys from 60s 70s)

  • @jennyrominger9426
    @jennyrominger9426 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Never lost a fight it has over 100 and something kills with 0 loses

    • @surfingtothestars
      @surfingtothestars 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      not against the aliens in Independence Day

    • @kurousagi8155
      @kurousagi8155 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ryan Rigsby those were F/A-18s.

  • @erik1tennant
    @erik1tennant 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    4:32
    the narrator of the clip Artur was watching said "F-14 Phantom" lmao

    • @steelwill4170
      @steelwill4170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The narrator/writers of this videos scripts made all kinds of errors 🤣 smh

  • @mellokeith
    @mellokeith 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When fighters are no longer “front line” they typically go to National Guard units then eventually are stripped of their equipment and the airframes retired to a desert airplane “graveyard”.

  • @Haltech007
    @Haltech007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    We did develop a single plane to ne the best at everything. It is the F/A-18 Super Hornet

    • @sheeplord4976
      @sheeplord4976 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It is sorta slow (especially the superbug), but it is still a great fighter.

    • @GregAtlas
      @GregAtlas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I wouldn't consider it "best at everything." It's good, but it's more specialized for naval use and has a fair number of drawbacks.

    • @loach392
      @loach392 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jay Ramirez the Marines only fly the original "legacy" hornet.

    • @YourGodStalin
      @YourGodStalin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The F-18 is a jack of all trades, but a master of none, the F-14 was better performing(when it wasn't falling apart mid flight), and the 15 and 16 are vastly superior in ever role, but don't take this as saying the F-18 is a bad plane, it's still probably one of the best.

    • @KillshotBen
      @KillshotBen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      F/A-18 is the best at nothing, but one of the best at everything, which is what the Navy needs on the first day of a war. It can't dogfight its modern equivalent, but it has the sensors to win BVR fights against them and continue to bring a ground strike payload in. It can outperform and shoot down any attack aircraft, though, and then do the job of an attacker pretty well. It's not stealthy, but it has a great electronics sweet that makes it less detectable than most similar aircraft. It doesn't have the climb rate of its Russian counterparts, or for that fact, its Air Force counterparts, but performs better after it gets to altitude than most of them.
      Its MER the only thing that it might be better than its competitors at, but I still think it gets beat in that category by the Rafale, if not the Typhoon as well

  • @ScenicFlyer4
    @ScenicFlyer4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Haven't even watched the video and I know it's going to be amazing

  • @parkerisaacson9664
    @parkerisaacson9664 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    “F-15 for sale, F-35 for sale, F-22; no no no. Too good we don’t sell that” 😂😂

  • @6point8esspcee68
    @6point8esspcee68 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    F-14 Tomcat, F-16 Falcon, F-18 Hornet....the list is extensive and impressive. Love your channel, brother. Keep it up!

  • @kevindvorak742
    @kevindvorak742 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    React to the 1st Marine Divisions battle of the Chosin Reservoir during the Korean War. Truly incredible story.

    • @jamalmckenzie3822
      @jamalmckenzie3822 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes thats a must and also the battle of hue city 1968

    • @deekim8164
      @deekim8164 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Finns would love the under-reported actions of the US Army and the US Marines during the "Battle of the Frozen Chosin."
      Hakkaa Päälle!

    • @y_am_i_here4663
      @y_am_i_here4663 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      what's it about?

    • @charlesrichardson2372
      @charlesrichardson2372 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamalmckenzie3822 Hue City was nasty.

  • @19thrange15
    @19thrange15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Can you react to the F -14 tomcat next

  • @Sybaris_Rex
    @Sybaris_Rex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "What does the US Air Force and Army need most?"
    Yes.

  • @Rick-last1
    @Rick-last1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was one of the second group that were working on the f-15. I was an avionics maintenance troop. I did that for 14 years. I loved that stubborn plane! air superiority was the f-15 A,B,C,and D. then you got the f-15 Strike eagle,,, she did it all , AA and AG. Gatling guns have rotating barrels,, loading as they rotate, faster that way, and the barrel cools down so can fire longer. Original price was quoted at 30 million in 1979. Oh and that vertical takeoff? we used to call it a Viking departure cause at night especially it looked like a viking rocket taking off. It actually was the first aircraft to accelerate in vertical flight.

  • @SenorVerde146
    @SenorVerde146 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I really love the nato flag! Love and N.A.T.O. Military support from Houston, Texas
    EDIT: btw I don’t serve I’m not even old enough i just saiid that because US and Estonia are allies.

    • @jc_boy4718
      @jc_boy4718 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Flag

    • @SenorVerde146
      @SenorVerde146 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oops small brain moment

    • @SenorVerde146
      @SenorVerde146 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Serial Killer Ok don’t have to be so aggressive about it.

    • @SenorVerde146
      @SenorVerde146 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Serial Killer it’s cool it was just all caps

  • @JoshuaRichards2010
    @JoshuaRichards2010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    As the saying goes: "Jack of all trades... master of none" in other words, if you spread your skill across multiple specialties, you are not very likely to excel or master any of them. This is because the different goals have contradictory requirements.

  • @Thalwegz
    @Thalwegz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw my first F-15 in '78 at an airshow in Scotland. Watching it flip up and accelerate straight up into the clouds was amazing.

  • @Ejecto_jeff
    @Ejecto_jeff 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m partial to the F15E. Thank you so much for checking it out in your video!!!!!

  • @YotaDude08
    @YotaDude08 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    React to the Ohio Class Submarine. Biggest baddest weapon on the planet. Capable of destroying entire countries.

    • @DevinEMILE
      @DevinEMILE 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I still think the Iowa Class Battleship was the baddest thing on the seas. Sure hasn't age well but damn still amazing. Montana Class would have been even better.

    • @no-hr3cv
      @no-hr3cv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      O H

    • @buckeyesfan4700
      @buckeyesfan4700 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@no-hr3cv - IO

    • @aarontodd72
      @aarontodd72 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      And just wait till the Columbia class comes out

    • @douglascampbell9809
      @douglascampbell9809 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This needs to be done.

  • @TrulyUnfortunate
    @TrulyUnfortunate 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I actually made prototype parts for the F-22 back in the day.
    As well as flight hardware for the NASA shuttle program.

  • @SomeOlDingus
    @SomeOlDingus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "104 victories and no losses, you can't do things like that on the ground." A wild Bradley appears...

  • @michaelwang6809
    @michaelwang6809 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Artur! As I posted on your previous F-22 video just earlier... the best way to understand fighter aircraft air-frames is to think of them as super expensive modular computer case; which has a "front panel" with a certain number of hard-points (USB ports/microphone/head/phone jack, etc)... for an aircraft these hard-points would be weapons/ sensor pods, etc. This case is specially designed to form fit a certain PSU/ jet engine, which will determine it's maximum power/thrust output. The internal components of the case (i.e. avionics) can be changed up and updated as time goes on, as long as the new system components fit within the old air-frame. This is similar to how an aircraft platform can be updated over the years as new and better technology emerges.
    The F-15 was originally designed in the 1960's, and built in the 1970's. And has gone through several major updates (which you can think of as completely new plane variants)
    F-15A/B* Eagle (1970's early 4th generation air-superiority fighter)
    F-15C/D* Golden Eagle (Late 1970's - early 1980's 4th generation air-superiority fighter)
    F-15E Strike Eagle (late 1980's 4th generation multi-role strike fighter)
    F-15SE Silent Eagle (2010 proposed 4.5 generation semi-stealthy fighter) [Not chosen for major production]
    F-15X Golden Eagle (2018-2020? 4th generation fighter) [currently being proposed by Boeing]
    Export variants
    F-15 J/DJ* (Japan)
    F-15 SA (Saudi Arabia)
    F-15 QA (Qatar)
    ...
    *designation represents two-seat training variant.
    @23:05 What happens to USAF planes that are retired?
    That depends, if other units are still using the system and it's parts are still serviceable; it may get stripped down and it's parts sent to other units. Most likely, if the air-frame is still good it will go the the "The Boneyard". The 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group's aircraft and missile storage and maintenance facility in Monthan AFB, Tucson, AZ. From there it sits in storage, and could theoretically be brought back into service (with new parts) in the event of a war or eventually it could be scrapped.

  • @BuickDoc
    @BuickDoc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3:50 The US debated this for 40 years. At one time they came up with the F4, a supersonic dump truck capable of carrying more bombs than many WW II bombers.

    • @adamb8317
      @adamb8317 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The F-15 is no dainty lady herself, but has the thrust of a freaking rocket to just blast through turns.

  • @MrAnimeWolf
    @MrAnimeWolf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The F-15E is one of my favorite looking and to use jet fighters in the Ace Combat series. You should try checking or the USS Enterprise. She was the most decorated US ship in WW 2 with 20 battle stars awarded to her.

    • @clintlarvenz2570
      @clintlarvenz2570 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Shes also the best anime ship waifu... lol

    • @MrAnimeWolf
      @MrAnimeWolf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clintlarvenz2570 I'll definitely second that

    • @TexasGreed
      @TexasGreed 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The infamous strike eagle. AKA Mudhen 🦅

  • @tylerwhite9923
    @tylerwhite9923 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The USAF is actually buying it's first new F-15s in 20 years. The new F-15EX fighter had the design and build of an F-15, but is updated with current-gen tech. It's going to augment the F-22 and F-35, primarily carrying munitions too large or heavy for either of those planes to carry, since the F-22 and F-35 are stealth based and have to have internal weapons bays, but the F-15 was designed before stealth was really a consideration, and thus has a lot of external mounting points. It's also supposed to be a lot easier to produce considering all of the improvements have already been commissioned by foreign air forces, and Boeing is pretty much putting them all into one fighter.

  • @sunnyle6598
    @sunnyle6598 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dunno if you have had any fans from Australia but g’day. I was recommended to your channel by TH-cam and I thank them for doing so. Your laugh cheers up and smile, thanks for lighting up my quarantine.

  • @acnash27
    @acnash27 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Wouldn't it be better to have one plane that's good at everything?" That's supposed to be the F-35, which is acting to replace the F/A-18s (which are good at everything). Both of these jets are good at everything, but aren't the best at any role.

    • @matthewwilliams2709
      @matthewwilliams2709 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your mistaken the F35 wasn’t developed to be an all purpose fighter our military operations are a team effort the F35 is the quarterback. It’s a network hub asset to be deployed into a active combat theater. It has excellent performances in every category should it have the need for direct self defense. But it’s not for active dog fighting but all the other in theater deployed assets like other fighters even naval ships the 35 can get into the theater remain undetected while its identifying enemy targets to then target with weapons being launched from other air assets even missiles off naval ships

  • @muggy87
    @muggy87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "if you are a jack of all trades you will be a master of none" you cant have an aircraft do everything, there needs to be specialized machines for it

  • @OdinAlgeron
    @OdinAlgeron 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are describing the F-14
    air to air, air to ground, naval superiority
    it truly was a badass plane

  • @robertball5107
    @robertball5107 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your question “How many Fs are there?” The U.S. started designating planes with F in 1947. Before that they were designated P or pursuit. The P/F designation went from P-1 all the way to F-111 plus a few extras like the F-117. Then they started all over in 1962 at F-1 and had gone through to F-23. The F-35 came from the X-35 experimental plane and they let it keep the 35 part.

  • @aspiringjockey5852
    @aspiringjockey5852 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    3:07 Thats called a Multi-Role Fighter it exists Artur you kinda explained the whole purpose of the Multi-Role Fighter when you were saying the idea you have.
    Stay well Artur from a Latvian!

  • @smoaky123
    @smoaky123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    “If you want to see reindeer go to Finland, if you want to feel them buy this watch” 😂😂😂

  • @matts4750
    @matts4750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Artur I love your channel...keep it up from New Orleans Louisiana America

  • @DoctorYoda2
    @DoctorYoda2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    8:00 It distinguishes fighter jets from the ground clutter, it doesn't use anomalies on the ground to detect fighter jets.
    Ground clutter is radar waves that are reflected by the surface of the Earth when you point your radar towards the ground.
    This means that previously, if you were above another fighter jet that was close-ish to the ground, it would be able to "hide" amongst the radar returns that the ground reflects.
    It would be like if you had a flash light at night, it would be easier to detect a distant pole from a sideways perspective, than from a top-down perspective.
    Hope this helps :)

    • @kdrapertrucker
      @kdrapertrucker 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The radar looks for doppler shifts in the radar signal, (doppler shift is the change in frequencies caused by movement, think of the sound of a train of car horn as it moves toward or away from you, that change in sound is the doppler shift in the sound) the radar uses doppler shift in the radio waves to detect and isolate the radar echo of a low flying aircraft.

    • @DoctorYoda2
      @DoctorYoda2 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kdrapertrucker Alright, I knew what it did, I just didn't have a good grasp on how it went about doing it. Thanks for the info :)

  • @hondascott996
    @hondascott996 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Artur, do a search for "F-15 lands with one wing". Isreal Airforce, true story.

    • @shithead1029384756
      @shithead1029384756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes! Truly an amazing plane.

    • @acquaadamas9047
      @acquaadamas9047 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      If I'm correct Israeli air force achieved majority of the F-15 kills

    • @keso_de_bola1750
      @keso_de_bola1750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Up on this one.

    • @hondascott996
      @hondascott996 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, proven

    • @sebastien3351
      @sebastien3351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Of course, IAF F-15s have seen far more combat than any other's air forces.

  • @tristonknudsen8482
    @tristonknudsen8482 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Helicopters win most simulated combat scenarios against fighter jets according to u.s. study

  • @spuds416
    @spuds416 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When the US "retires" an acft it is sent to the boneyard in Tucson AZ. Some planes serve as parts donors others that are technically serviceable are "wrapped up and sealed" for possible use. You should check out videos about "The Boneyard "

  • @wolfclaw1977
    @wolfclaw1977 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    in order to get a plane that does everything would be expensive but i think the hardest thing that process would be training the pilots in air to air, air to ground, and air to sea combat or something along those lines

  • @upcommerbunny8588
    @upcommerbunny8588 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Fourth, react to Killer bean.

  • @keeganturbitt1101
    @keeganturbitt1101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    React to the Jericho Missile 😂

  • @Wolf-1814
    @Wolf-1814 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the US, the retired aircraft are usually flown to a storage facility such as AMARG at Davis-Monthan Air force Base in Tucson Arizona, for long term storage or scrapping. Some aircraft that are still suitable for use are refurbished and sold to foreign governments.

  • @rcrocker02
    @rcrocker02 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's a f15 that survived a mid air collision, ripped an entire wing off and still flew in and landed. You can find the video about it on TH-cam.

  • @jackofalltrades7469
    @jackofalltrades7469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another thing I don't have is a cute blond girl like the one wearing the hat, where do I order one?

  • @ryand.3858
    @ryand.3858 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F15 is way larger in person than I had imagined. Such a good looking plane as well.
    An Israeli pilot safely landed one of these with only one wing after a mishap during a training exercise tore the other one off. Remarkable aircraft. 💪

  • @lance_the_avocado9492
    @lance_the_avocado9492 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    For your question about Attack Helicopters vs aircraft, most attack helicopter have an offense for fighter aircraft and usually they are IR guided air to air missiles. Example: the AH-64 Apache can be equipped with four AIM-92 Stinger missiles.

  • @learnmyname123
    @learnmyname123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    to sum up; The F35 is basically a nice new SUV, the F15 is a sports car that now has a big trunk. The F22 however is our Ferrari, its our coolest, so we want to be the only ones with them.

  • @hexplays913
    @hexplays913 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The letters on each aircraft stands for the plains job.. so F stands for fighter(air to air)... C stands for cargo..etc

  • @Titus-as-the-Roman
    @Titus-as-the-Roman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    For those Americans that knows history, Finland is greatly respected. I feel that one of our failures in the early WW2 years was we were so isolationist, we could have helped Finland in their winter war with the soviets, at least give then material support if nothing else.

  • @kevincostello1319
    @kevincostello1319 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My grandfather was from Lapland Sweden... Actual reindeer farmer until he moved to the US and worked for Atlantic records and managed Bobby Darin. His one regret was refusing to manage David Bowie... We still have a gold record for "Mac the Knife" song by Bobby Darin... Cool!

  • @clintatk
    @clintatk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A plane that can do everything sounds perfect. Except you run into physics. You gotta choose your pros and cons. They can all multitask, but their designs have to choose their big strength. And you are always looking at your adversary, who you will have to compete with in combat.

  • @superdave54811
    @superdave54811 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I worked on the F-15 while on a long overseas tour of duty in Okinawa at Kadena AFB. It is still a fine fighter!

  • @jtoatoktoe
    @jtoatoktoe 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    U.S. also had F-16 which is one of the most produced modern aircraft and flown by many many countries. F-14 was the Navy Air Superiority Fighter until 2007 when it was retired. Now the Navy uses F/A-18 E and F Super Hornets (And E/A-18 Growler) for all roles with the F-35C Slowly coming into the fleet.

  • @satsunada
    @satsunada 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F-22's had budget issues but the larger issue that arose later was the rebreather device for the pilot. They had issues with it and pilot's were slowly suffocating and could risk passing out. They think they have solutions in place but the rollout for the full fleet with a fully serviceable solution is charted for around 2022. They found a few other issues that they want to fix that worsen the issue, like the safety vest the pilots wear for landing in the water would randomly and slowly inflate causing chest compression. Coupled with the rebreather failure, this led to at least one confirmed fatal crash.

  • @thebigitchy
    @thebigitchy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The US started mounting M61 gatling guns on fighters with the F-104. Until then, all aircraft designers would mount several single barrel machine guns or cannons to get a high enough firing rate to make reliable hits. Gatlings give a very high firing rate using multiple barrels in a much more compact package, which is what the F-104 needed.

  • @jamesevanston8334
    @jamesevanston8334 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The US Military does NOT design weapons... They put out specifications of what they want, and private industry designs, develops, and builds the weapon(or weapon platform). Sometimes they approach the military with a weapon to see if there is an interest then go from there.

  • @georgephillips3625
    @georgephillips3625 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F15 was fitted with 3 external fuel tanks for crossing the Atlantic. They removed the external tanks for battle.

  • @prime-rib
    @prime-rib 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The newest F-15E version is the F-15 Advanced, which features fly-by-wire controls. The APG-63(V)2 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar has been retrofitted to 18 U.S. Air Force F-15C aircraft. The F-15 platform is expected to be in service at least until 2040.

  • @DreadWing7777
    @DreadWing7777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In my opinion the F-15S/MTD or ACTIVE is my favorite variant of the F-15 Eagle.

  • @alextjb
    @alextjb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The airframes go through stress so they are rated for a certain number of flying hours.
    After that they aren’t rated to fly anymore and they strip out anything that can be used for parts for other aircraft and maintenance. Then typically the frame itself ends up in the scrap yard. But wrapped up and preserved as a “just in case” we need it back because of a war or some other reason and they need to refit them. Pretty unlikely... but we are hoarders and never throw anything away.

  • @thegamingironman
    @thegamingironman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They scrap them once fully retired....they retire them after its almost impossible to repair the jet due to lack of manufactured parts

  • @samr7609
    @samr7609 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The navy usually deals with naval targets and Air Force uses multi role fighters that can deal with air to air and air to ground

  • @Vatsyayana87
    @Vatsyayana87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:35 Thats an F4 Phantom... F-14 was a beast and what we had on our carriers before switching to the F-18 Hornets. You should check the 14 out if you havent yet.

    • @nooneyouknowhere6148
      @nooneyouknowhere6148 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      F15 was going to be carrier based but it is too much of a lift body design. Too hard to land on a pitching deck with gusts of wind v

  • @jerryhosford4557
    @jerryhosford4557 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Our AWACS radar planes also have tactical data links, for comms with air and ground. I know because I worked comms in the AF. My brother also was maintenance on the F-15E, during Desert Storm.

  • @sec2112
    @sec2112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When an active duty aircraft is retired they generally ship them to National Guard or Reserve units.

  • @DoctorYoda2
    @DoctorYoda2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    23:05 They'll either be stored in reserve (aka a "Boneyard" like Davis-Monthan AFB) or will be used as target drones like the QF-4s and QF-16s.

  • @L77045
    @L77045 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For other 'F' planes, the F-16, F-18, F-117, F-14, and F-4 would probably be the most interesting reactions in order.
    The F-16 is still going strong. The F-18 is as well, and may be the best example of 'doing everything' like you mentioned. The F-117 had a very interesting history, as well as things like a 4-D autopilot which sounds crazy to most people even today. The F-14 was iconic to a lot of Americans and had a very cool design. The F-4 had a troubled and very interesting history.

    • @randlebrowne2048
      @randlebrowne2048 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You might add in the F-111 and EF-111 as well.

  • @matthewhull5876
    @matthewhull5876 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I live in Portland Oregon. I get to see these guys fly over almost every day. Doing west coast patrol.

  • @mikew.762
    @mikew.762 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F14 Tomcat was a favorite fighter jet as a kid. I grew up with the Blue Angel’s flying over my house. The US Navy replaced the F14 with the F18 Super Hornet due to the high cost of up keep of the F14. The Blue Angels are now flying the F18 Super Hornets. The Blue Angels are some of the top pilots in the world doing aviation stunts at air shows across the USA.

  • @62rowley
    @62rowley 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You mentioned watching a plane that can fly at mach two firing a Gatling gun. There’s a TH-camr called the History Guy who did a segment about three times airplanes actually shut themselves down. Because of their high speed and maneuvering, they fire their guns and turn and actually get hit by their own bullets. Luv the vids. Hello from Mt Rushmore. 🇺🇸👍🇪🇪

  • @eatshit2863
    @eatshit2863 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Navy's air force is actually larger than the actual Air Force. Every aircraft is built for a specific purpose. A (10) is attack B (2) is bomber F (15) is fighter FB (18) is fighter bomber C (5) is cargo E (2) is electronic jamming etc. There are numerous variations such as AC130 gunship EFB 111 etc. We have ALL the bases covered.

  • @Dingusdoofus
    @Dingusdoofus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are the F-14 Tomcat, F-16 Falcon, and F-18 Hornet.

  • @cfromcass
    @cfromcass 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just purchased the one looks just like yours. Beautiful watch.

  • @rjbrown6942
    @rjbrown6942 ปีที่แล้ว

    Either the F--15 or F-16 one of them had had 0 loss record and hasnt ever lost a dog fight. That's amazing

  • @Titus-as-the-Roman
    @Titus-as-the-Roman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F-4 Phantom was supposed to be a do-all aircraft, but as the old saying goes "A Jack of all trades is a master at none", we learned that hard lesson in Vietnam.

  • @SDLEIKAM
    @SDLEIKAM 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another fighter that was developed about the same time is the F-16 Fighting Falcon. It is very nimble and can be equipped with different packages depending on the mission.

  • @dagunna3
    @dagunna3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    much love from canada my friend

  • @3Authoress
    @3Authoress 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You might be interested to know that in May 1983, an Israeli F-15D had its right wing sheered off due to a mid-air collision caused by an A-4 Skyhawk during an exercise. The Skyhawk pilot ejected before his plane disintegrated. But the two F-15D crewmen managed to fly the plane all the way to an airport, land, and both escaped with no injuries.

  • @larrywelchko6136
    @larrywelchko6136 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was also an Israeli F-15 D that lost a wing and the pilot was able to land the plane only using thrust from the engines. That is a bad ass pilot

  • @smoke_eater_
    @smoke_eater_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “I need everything” F-15E baby, F-15E.

  • @gordonduke8812
    @gordonduke8812 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One advantage of having multi purposed planes is the usage of the available space on a carrier. No matter the situation that arises, the carrier within striking distance will be capable.

  • @evrydayamerican
    @evrydayamerican 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    that's why we developed the F-35 it is a joint strike fighter. The plane can control its own drones autonomously all while fighting an air to air and air to ground fight all at the same time.

  • @learnmyname123
    @learnmyname123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    F18 is the Navy and Marines workhorse. I was on a carrier and this was almost all we used. You must check it out.

  • @williamray6948
    @williamray6948 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F15 is actually back on the production line for the USA with a full modern upgrade

  • @cfromcass
    @cfromcass 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    "How many Fs are there I don't know I don't give a (F-is silent) I have too many Fs to give" Hilarious editing AR. I Love you.

  • @ryanf7301
    @ryanf7301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have so many aircraft. These makes me even more proud to be American lol. Thanks Artur

  • @adamkunz6212
    @adamkunz6212 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Artur should really come to America and see an air show or a military demonstration

  • @portee9113
    @portee9113 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    F15s are going to serve alongside its 5th gen counterparts by acting as a missile deck that uses the target data from the stealth aircraft which are closer to the enemy. So a common wing config would be 1 f22 and 3 f15, or 2F35 and 2 f15

  • @dlpheonix
    @dlpheonix 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    American attack helicopters can equip sidewinder missles usually. In some cases longer range missles can be specially fitted.

  • @erynncollier8672
    @erynncollier8672 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F-35 costs between 110 million and 150 million per aircraft while the F-15EX Costs 87.7 million per aircraft. F-35 air frames are expected to last 8,000 hours while the F-15EX will last 20,000. Additionally, the upkeep cost for the F-35 sits at about 44,000 per hour nest to the F-15 EX's 29,000 per hour.
    I think it's pretty easy to see why the F-15 is still in service. The only reason we have the F-35 seems to be its stealth and V/STOL capabilities.

  • @kdrapertrucker
    @kdrapertrucker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    When the F-15A was first put in service, the motto was "not one pound for air to ground" meaning it was purely an air/air fighter, in 1989, a modified F-15D 2 seat aircraft won an air force competition to replace the F-111 in all weather strike mission and is known as the F-15 E strike eagle.