I used vray for my architectural projects, but since I started using corona renderer I forgot about vray, I love how corona renderer keeps things simple and you can setup your scenes quicker than vray, and yes, you may say why not use D5 render or lumion whatever, its just that they dont give me the quality I want.
Hello, Actually, when I'm comparing V-Ray to Corona Renderer, I lean towards V-Ray due to its status as one of the earliest and most influential render engines in the industry. While both share common functionalities, V-Ray offers a unique level of flexibility and control, particularly in its vast toolset and customizable configurations, from materials to scene setups. V-Ray's long-standing dominance in the market has led to a more developed and refined workflow, allowing for greater precision and adaptability in complex projects. While Corona is known for its user-friendly simplicity, V-Ray's depth and customization make it the superior choice for those who seek maximum control over their rendering process so in the end of it all, both are very powerful, dynamic, and versatile.
Thank you for publishing your correct and complete comments. Yes, it's popular for its simplicity, and vray offers more customization settings for the scene and controls.❤️🙏🏻
I love 3ds Max and Vray. I'm open to learning Corona but this comparison is weird. (I'm only 2 minutes into the video, and questioning if I should even continue.) ---- Are both Corona and Vray using denoiser? You complain about Vray losing detail but that is exactly why you should turn off denoiser.
Thanks for your comment 🤍 This comparison is done under the same conditions and with the default criteria. Definitely, with more changes and the passage of time, I can reach the right output. In Corona, you can see the output of the work with a faster speed and reach the result.
Very interesting video, thanks a lot! But you should also compare speed and quality of V-Ray engine with Bucket sampler and Lightcache+Irradiance Map technique. That's where V-Ray takes huge advantage)
If you do with Bucket sampler and Lightcache+Irradiance Map, then the quality of realism will be far worse than corona, even less than chaosvantage. That method was only used 5 years ago
Thank you for your comment. This comparison is done in cpu and basic and beginner settings. In the following comparisons, we will consider more parameters for comparison. 🌱
Nice comparison. V-Ray was my main renderer back in the day before I switched to FStorm. Quality-wise, V-Ray hasn't been great for a while, though it's faster than Corona when tweaked (due to being biased). People still use V-Ray for its large asset library and features, but I can't recall a decent render straight out of V-Ray without heavy post-production. Could you do a FStorm vs. Corona comparison next?
The Corona is indeed a bit more realistic in rendering, but why didn't you focus on Vray GPU rendering? after all, it is hundreds of times faster and it can be used not only for videos, but also for ordinary pictures, which speeds up the work at times.
First of all, thank you for your comment. These two rendering engines have many similarities. vray provides us with more possibilities in general. Of course, Corona is getting closer to vray day by day. I myself switched from Vray to Corona, but currently I use each depending on the needs of the project. In general, learning both is very convenient.
the first point is so misleading. u chose vray default engine for denoiser and it is a slow, u could've used nvidia denoiser which is much much faster. and if im not mistaken, corona uses the nvidia denoiser as well for interactive render and not the one u chose in the denoiser tab
Let's not forget we still are in brutal, primitive capitalism. So since Corona has been bought by it's main competitor, a big problem emerges and that is the future. Will Corona still be developed seriously or will it be allowed to wither and fade out? Something along the lines of what Foundry did to Modo...
Thanks for your comment. Yes, it is possible that this will happen and interesting features will be released for vray and corona will gradually be removed or faded.
Actually there is no compare between corona R and vray R because the first use path tracing that is more powerful than the ray tracing which vray use so corona dealing with lightning much more better than vray. I don't know why vray don't use the path tracing which I think it will be the future of the engine render in the future. But I think that chaos add corona to there company so they have the tow engine each with different types of algorithm (path&ray) tracing.
Whatever the rendering engine is back again who uses it, there are some users who are more adept with vray with excellent results without psd, as well as corona. if the comparison of Vray CPU & Corona CPU, obviously Corona is superior in time, but not in detail, that's my opinion
I have been going back and forward from vray to corona because of different studios workflow; and yes there are differences… aerial perspective, sky model, improved sun, cáustics… Easy is not always the best option, there is a big difference between the way both engines calculate the light; brute force as primary engine in vray is indeed pathtracing of corona, but it is not as good as in vray; subdivs in vray can go up to 32 bits while in corona stays in 8? Where is the HDR of the lights in corona in here? Vray uses reinhart to compact the lights while corona uses exr? Aces OT im sorry; but that is not helping to create a non linear render(photografic); corona does help begginers with a colorish render but it is frustrating to advanced artist that cant control the problems corona gives. For me corona is like taking a photo with an iphone 16; while vray does it with a cannon ; of course everyone prefers taking it with the easiest. PD. If you prefer fast over quality; this explains a lot you choose corona
The unfortuate thing is that Chaos group own both render engines, so its not in their best inerests to give one all the bells and whistles and instead make them both have pros and cons.
Thank you for your comment. You spell it right and this is the policy of this company so that it can have specific customers for each rendering engine.
2 mins in and already I can call it BS comparison. Pretty much looked like the scene was done for Corona and all you just did was use Vray converter and converted the scene hence the weird Texture colors and mapping of the wood texture in the chair. Do a proper and fair comparison rather than be Biased
Thank you for your comment. In this video, an attempt was made to compare the scene in two rendering engines in the same conditions without settings. I will definitely achieve good results by working on the project in both engines.
Test mal feito, Vray tem muito mais qualidade do que o test feito no video, este tipo de teste deve ser feito por quem entenda de renderizaçõa e saiba usar bem os dois programas.
vray has a lot of power in other cases and more control in the render setup, which was mentioned in the summary video, and in the future we will provide a video with more details.😌🙏🏻🌱
The recorded video is a comparison between the mentioned items. And during the video, it has been said many times that both rendering engines have their own advantages and the user can choose it according to his needs.
Our team has 7 years of experience in the field of rendering. Again, tell me something that you think can be useful for others. Thank you for your opinion
Hmm... both the render engine has their strengths and weaknesses, but being from blender background, their workflow gives me a headache. Its like constant fiddeling with controls and plugins. Whereas in cycles, you are done with just a few clicks. Also the realtime workflow is faster in cycles. Among Vray and Corona, corona looks a better choice, but that 3ds max workflow and its UI makes me wanna vomit on my PC everytime I open it.
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us. We hope that in the future, the problems of both rendering engines will decrease and create a user-friendly environment for everyone.
On the contrary, I feel using blender is counterproductive to me. Importing from sketchup often gives me inconsistent accuracy (missing objects, improper quads, etc). And what makes me want to stick to 3ds max is the ability to group objects flawlessly and separate them by layers. In blender, you can use container, but putting objects in container takes lot of time. In my projects, grouping is a must, I have to make around 300+ groups on average before I start working on my scene. Also, the ability to access multiple professional 3d assets such as 3dsky, bendtrade, etc. is what separate professional archviz artist from hobbyist using blender.
@@sambagyarta Yeah I agree on the sketchup part but a good archviz artist will never look towards SketchUp other than just to import some assets which work quiet seamlessly with newer versions of sketchup importer plugin. I have never used grouping so I wont know how that works or make the life easier but I think most of those can be taken care of with the collections and also parenting. Different workflows I guess, but what I like is the ability to work without even moving my mouse to fiddle with the tabs and buttons and that clumpsy autodesk UI. Its the UI that bugs me the most and it just gives me headache. Also having a huge library is good but its also so much time consuming to select the objects. But blender is also catching up pretty fast with blenderkit and other libraries. Also the professional libraries have already started giving out their blender versions so that's not much of a big deal. So lets enjoy what we have build the best we can. All these opinions are my personal. I started by learning 3ds max but was quickly bored with so many windows, tabs and buttons and the UI that I had to drop and move to Cinema4d. And after that to blender. But its good that Vray is coming to blender too. Hopefully we will be able to enjoy the best of both the worlds.
I used vray for my architectural projects, but since I started using corona renderer I forgot about vray, I love how corona renderer keeps things simple and you can setup your scenes quicker than vray, and yes, you may say why not use D5 render or lumion whatever, its just that they dont give me the quality I want.
Thanks for the comment and sharing your experiences ❤️
A very detailed and practical comparison👏🏻thank u 🌟
Thanks 😊🌱
Thanks for a great comparison. I’ve been using corona for about a year for archviz and now I’m trying to learn vray for a bit more accuracy
Sounds good 👌
whoaah! SUPER LIKE THIS!
🙏🏻❤️
Hello, Actually, when I'm comparing V-Ray to Corona Renderer, I lean towards V-Ray due to its status as one of the earliest and most influential render engines in the industry. While both share common functionalities, V-Ray offers a unique level of flexibility and control, particularly in its vast toolset and customizable configurations, from materials to scene setups. V-Ray's long-standing dominance in the market has led to a more developed and refined workflow, allowing for greater precision and adaptability in complex projects. While Corona is known for its user-friendly simplicity, V-Ray's depth and customization make it the superior choice for those who seek maximum control over their rendering process so in the end of it all, both are very powerful, dynamic, and versatile.
Thank you for publishing your correct and complete comments. Yes, it's popular for its simplicity, and vray offers more customization settings for the scene and controls.❤️🙏🏻
Proper tool for the proper job...maybe some people don't like/need wasting time fiddling with thousands of tiny buttons.
@@FictionCautious I agree with that too.
I love 3ds Max and Vray. I'm open to learning Corona but this comparison is weird. (I'm only 2 minutes into the video, and questioning if I should even continue.) ---- Are both Corona and Vray using denoiser? You complain about Vray losing detail but that is exactly why you should turn off denoiser.
Thanks for your comment 🤍
This comparison is done under the same conditions and with the default criteria. Definitely, with more changes and the passage of time, I can reach the right output. In Corona, you can see the output of the work with a faster speed and reach the result.
But you do know why we need to enable denoiser right ?
super comparison! :)
Glad you think so 🙏🏻🤍
I am a beginner to Corona and VRAY. It is taking me much longer to render in Corona than in VRAY. Why could this be?
Have you done the comparison in the scene with the same conditions
@@MIMVizStudio yes, and the VRAY Resolution is better than Corona
how we can work between enscape & vray?? i mean which version of the both programs needed for this function??
Thanks for your comment. 💕
You need enscape 3.5.6 and higher and vray 6.2
With the help of this transition, you can use the full capabilities of vray to get the output.😊
Very interesting video, thanks a lot!
But you should also compare speed and quality of V-Ray engine with Bucket sampler and Lightcache+Irradiance Map technique. That's where V-Ray takes huge advantage)
Great point!
Thank you for your comment. Yes, it definitely is. We will definitely make a video about this. ❤️😊
good bro
but vray 6.2 too fast now
If you do with Bucket sampler and Lightcache+Irradiance Map, then the quality of realism will be far worse than corona, even less than chaosvantage. That method was only used 5 years ago
Is this gpu or cpu? Light cash or brute force? Is the color management ACES? There’s so much missing information.
Thank you for your comment. This comparison is done in cpu and basic and beginner settings. In the following comparisons, we will consider more parameters for comparison. 🌱
Nice comparison. V-Ray was my main renderer back in the day before I switched to FStorm. Quality-wise, V-Ray hasn't been great for a while, though it's faster than Corona when tweaked (due to being biased). People still use V-Ray for its large asset library and features, but I can't recall a decent render straight out of V-Ray without heavy post-production.
Could you do a FStorm vs. Corona comparison next?
We are not experts in this field and if we produce a video, we may not provide accurate information.
thanks for your comment 💕
What render that you use? Procie or gpu??
In both engines, cpu and default settings are used.
Thanks for being honest. All I need is fast rendering. Time is very essential
Absolutely 👍. Thanks for sharing your opinion.
You could use in Corona 2d pan zoom, it works like real zoom in Vray
Yes, this item works. thanks
Trabajo con los 2. Buena comparación ✨✨
thanks for your comment
Perfect 👌🏼🔥🔥
thanks ❤️❤️
Muy buena comparación amigo, para mí corona ganó por el tiempo y la velocidad y el precio también, corona siempre ha tenido una calidad aceptable
Thanks for your comment 😌❤️
The Corona is indeed a bit more realistic in rendering, but why didn't you focus on Vray GPU rendering? after all, it is hundreds of times faster and it can be used not only for videos, but also for ordinary pictures, which speeds up the work at times.
Thank you!
You're welcome 😇🤍
very useful 🔥👍🏻
❤❤
is corona good for revit????
This rendering engine is not yet provided for Revit
@@MIMVizStudio can you recommend the best render engine for revit beside lumion ?
Thanks A Lot❤
Always welcome
nice video!
Thanks buddy 🤍🌱
What about d5 2.9
D5 comparison videos will be produced soon.
vantage will available soon in corona actually
Yes, this is very good news.
Hi. I m already using VRay, should I switch to corona?🤔 Any honest suggestions??
First of all, thank you for your comment. These two rendering engines have many similarities. vray provides us with more possibilities in general. Of course, Corona is getting closer to vray day by day. I myself switched from Vray to Corona, but currently I use each depending on the needs of the project.
In general, learning both is very convenient.
@@MIMVizStudio ok great...thank you for the valuable reply..🙂
the first point is so misleading. u chose vray default engine for denoiser and it is a slow, u could've used nvidia denoiser which is much much faster. and if im not mistaken, corona uses the nvidia denoiser as well for interactive render and not the one u chose in the denoiser tab
Yes, it was said in the video that the comparison was made with the default settings. By changing them, you can definitely get good results
Thank you
🙏🏻❤️
Let's not forget we still are in brutal, primitive capitalism. So since Corona has been bought by it's main competitor, a big problem emerges and that is the future. Will Corona still be developed seriously or will it be allowed to wither and fade out? Something along the lines of what Foundry did to Modo...
Thanks for your comment. Yes, it is possible that this will happen and interesting features will be released for vray and corona will gradually be removed or faded.
I think the real zoom effect can be achieved in corona with the 2d pan zoom. I dont know if it doesnt work for everyone.
Yes, you are absolutely right
As I know, Vantage will support Corona materials soon, so it will be great if you have expensive graphic card
Yes, this item was introduced in Chaos Unboxed.
💕💕
Corona CPU faster that V-Ray GPU in rendering time ?!? It's a joke your test ?
no my friend Corona is faster if we put both engines on cpu. If you pay attention, the gpu in Viri is one of its most attractive features.
True
Most of you guys haven’t even watched the video carefully.
can you please post your system configuration ?
Yes ofcourse.
CPU Intel 12700k
GPU RTX 3070Ti
Memory 32
@@MIMVizStudio Corona time is with cpu cores and vray with gpu corse? Strage result... gpu should be faster... thanks
@@MIMVizStudio
Actually there is no compare between corona R and vray R because the first use path tracing that is more powerful than the ray tracing which vray use so corona dealing with lightning much more better than vray. I don't know why vray don't use the path tracing which I think it will be the future of the engine render in the future. But I think that chaos add corona to there company so they have the tow engine each with different types of algorithm (path&ray) tracing.
Thank you for your complete and expert explanation. ☺️❤️🙏🏻
you can enable path rendering in v-ray (experimental feature still)
wow!!
Thanks 🤍
Whatever the rendering engine is back again who uses it, there are some users who are more adept with vray with excellent results without psd, as well as corona.
if the comparison of Vray CPU & Corona CPU, obviously Corona is superior in time, but not in detail, that's my opinion
Thanks for sharing your experience 🤍🙏🏻
Me confuse in blender it's not a user friendly, but corona render is way more better than vray, I just use vray becoz of chaos vantage
thanks for your comment
Actually I have used both but I found Corona to be better and easier.
Thanks for your comment and opinion 🤍🙏🏻
Vray is awesome....
Corona have many limitations.
Thanks for your comment ❤️🌱
Tell me how to make customized cloud and god rays in VRay ?
@@raywong3184 find tutorial in TH-cam so you can know how to create cloud and rays in vray
If we talk about rendering speed Vray with GPU beats corona, that cannot be ignored
Yes, it cannot be ignored. It is true.
I have been going back and forward from vray to corona because of different studios workflow; and yes there are differences… aerial perspective, sky model, improved sun, cáustics…
Easy is not always the best option, there is a big difference between the way both engines calculate the light; brute force as primary engine in vray is indeed pathtracing of corona, but it is not as good as in vray; subdivs in vray can go up to 32 bits while in corona stays in 8? Where is the HDR of the lights in corona in here? Vray uses reinhart to compact the lights while corona uses exr? Aces OT im sorry; but that is not helping to create a non linear render(photografic); corona does help begginers with a colorish render but it is frustrating to advanced artist that cant control the problems corona gives. For me corona is like taking a photo with an iphone 16; while vray does it with a cannon ; of course everyone prefers taking it with the easiest.
PD. If you prefer fast over quality; this explains a lot you choose corona
The unfortuate thing is that Chaos group own both render engines, so its not in their best inerests to give one all the bells and whistles and instead make them both have pros and cons.
Thank you for your comment.
You spell it right and this is the policy of this company so that it can have specific customers for each rendering engine.
I use to like vray but corona is very fast on cpu
Thanks for your comment 🤍🌱
I know 12 persons who definitely migrated from V-Ray to Corona and nobody who made reverse migration !
Yes, and the main reason is to achieve good results quickly.
2 mins in and already I can call it BS comparison. Pretty much looked like the scene was done for Corona and all you just did was use Vray converter and converted the scene hence the weird Texture colors and mapping of the wood texture in the chair. Do a proper and fair comparison rather than be Biased
Thank you for your comment. In this video, an attempt was made to compare the scene in two rendering engines in the same conditions without settings. I will definitely achieve good results by working on the project in both engines.
But Corona Crashes lot more than Vray, that’s why I prefer Vray
Thanks for your comment and your explanation 🙏🏻😌
Test mal feito, Vray tem muito mais qualidade do que o test feito no video, este tipo de teste deve ser feito por quem entenda de renderizaçõa e saiba usar bem os dois programas.
Thank you for your comment.
vray has a lot of power in other cases and more control in the render setup, which was mentioned in the summary video, and in the future we will provide a video with more details.😌🙏🏻🌱
How much better do you think the users have to be? As good as the app creator ? I mean most of us ?
What about Arnold
In the future, we may produce its video
Blender Cycles is better
It's not correct
FAKE
Please express your opinion fully and with reasons🙂🙏🏻
how much experience you have ?@@MIMVizStudio
how much your experience about rendering field @@MIMVizStudio
The recorded video is a comparison between the mentioned items. And during the video, it has been said many times that both rendering engines have their own advantages and the user can choose it according to his needs.
Our team has 7 years of experience in the field of rendering.
Again, tell me something that you think can be useful for others.
Thank you for your opinion
ai is better…😢😢😢
ai is developing a lot and is scaring many people day by day. And we must try to accept it and add it to our work.
Hmm... both the render engine has their strengths and weaknesses, but being from blender background, their workflow gives me a headache. Its like constant fiddeling with controls and plugins. Whereas in cycles, you are done with just a few clicks. Also the realtime workflow is faster in cycles. Among Vray and Corona, corona looks a better choice, but that 3ds max workflow and its UI makes me wanna vomit on my PC everytime I open it.
Thank you for sharing your opinion with us. We hope that in the future, the problems of both rendering engines will decrease and create a user-friendly environment for everyone.
On the contrary, I feel using blender is counterproductive to me. Importing from sketchup often gives me inconsistent accuracy (missing objects, improper quads, etc).
And what makes me want to stick to 3ds max is the ability to group objects flawlessly and separate them by layers. In blender, you can use container, but putting objects in container takes lot of time. In my projects, grouping is a must, I have to make around 300+ groups on average before I start working on my scene.
Also, the ability to access multiple professional 3d assets such as 3dsky, bendtrade, etc. is what separate professional archviz artist from hobbyist using blender.
Thank you for your comment and opinion🙂@@sambagyarta
@@sambagyarta Yeah I agree on the sketchup part but a good archviz artist will never look towards SketchUp other than just to import some assets which work quiet seamlessly with newer versions of sketchup importer plugin.
I have never used grouping so I wont know how that works or make the life easier but I think most of those can be taken care of with the collections and also parenting. Different workflows I guess, but what I like is the ability to work without even moving my mouse to fiddle with the tabs and buttons and that clumpsy autodesk UI. Its the UI that bugs me the most and it just gives me headache.
Also having a huge library is good but its also so much time consuming to select the objects. But blender is also catching up pretty fast with blenderkit and other libraries. Also the professional libraries have already started giving out their blender versions so that's not much of a big deal. So lets enjoy what we have build the best we can.
All these opinions are my personal. I started by learning 3ds max but was quickly bored with so many windows, tabs and buttons and the UI that I had to drop and move to Cinema4d. And after that to blender. But its good that Vray is coming to blender too. Hopefully we will be able to enjoy the best of both the worlds.
i agree woth you with the interface of 3d max , thats why i use c4d :) and sometimes blender for modeling