Agreed with you Rob! If i could only afford a $8000 bike then yeah go for the Hunter (or Meteor :D ) but if the pocket allows, then the 650 is the way to go!
I need both. I've had an Interceptor for 4 years. You're right it's incredibly versatile. I don't really need the Hunter so maybe I just want the thrill of new bike ownership 😅
This is why i got them both , and i can tell you the interceptor is fantastic and really good value for money !! the Hunter 350 so much fun to ride (so nimble) and isnt that what its all about ?
I have an Interceptor, but I really like the aesthetic of the Hunter....... I really think something along the lines of a 660cc Single Hunter would be an absolute hoot to ride!
I saw the hunter for the first time day before yesterday night and saw the interceptor 650 yesterday again for the first time close up I've seen years ago but never a bike guy so you know but I liked it ,,, compared to both love the interceptor like really nice
Meteor 350 and interceptor 650 owner here. The meteor is a far better heavy traffic commuter, and gets ridden far more often than the interceptor. Doesn't mess up your shoes as well because of the heel shifter. You're right, the interceptor has more oomph, but you can't squeeze it all in heavy traffic, can you? Interceptor has more power for highway speeds but barely, imho, and it's also too cramped for longer rides, and the seat is terrible. For highway involving one or more day trips, i always go for other options other than the interceptor. Nice bike, but any of the 350 variants will make a better commuter and for longer trips better 60 or more hp, wind protection and more leg room. For me, the 350 platform is a clear winner
@@breadgarlichouse2265 do whatever you like, is your money. All I'm saying, is that it depends on what you want to do with it. Want the one and only bike between the two? Better go for the interceptor. Can afford both? Meteor is a better city commuter. Where do you want to go 160 km/h, by the way? It it's in the track, go for something else. In the city? Impossible. In the highway? Then go for something else as well. Fwiw, both bikes are relatively slow. Meteor is slower, but in the heavy city traffic, you just can't tell the difference anyways.
@@breadgarlichouse2265 forget it, he's a know-it-all expert who confuses opinions with fact. I ride my interceptor in heavy traffic all the time and when out of town it's more than fast enough for the highway and country roads.
LIVING BEING IS OUR RACE, MANKIND IS OUR RELIGION, HINDU,MUSLIM,SIKH,CHRISTAIN, THERE IS NO SEPARATE RELIGION ALMIGHTY GOD KABIR is the father of all souls that JESUS, MOHAMMAD, GURU NANAK, VEDH was telling in BIBLE, QURAN, GURU GRANTHA SAHEB Almighty God KABIR is the CREATOR OF all SOULS -- SAINT RAMPALJI MAHARAJ
I bought the Hunter. I think the second one sold in Adelaide in December. I love it. Didn't quite have enough pocket money for the Interceptor . . . maybe in a couple of years. See what Royal Enfield come out with by then. Cheers
Royal Enfield has never pulled me, but the loyal following it has… must admit it intrigues me. There is a dealership not far from me, I think I just might have to go check them out.
20bhp versus 47bhp is more than double. I prefer the look of the 350 Royal Enfield range to the Interceptor but as you say the Interceptor is far better on the highway. The mostly 110kph highway Australia speed limits would stretch the Hunter’s limits especially for extended periods. For a great looking urban bike it’s hard to go past a Royal Enfield 350 but for a purely practical urban bike you can’t beat a motor scooter. Most have generous luggage capacity, nothing beats an automatic in heavy traffic, you don’t cop the heat from the engine or exhaust sitting in traffic and you get better weather protection than what the Enfield offers on those rainy days. Enjoyed this video👍.
You make a good point with the "bigger and better" - I currently drive an 883cc Harley but mostly drive in my urban 3 sq mile city - it's actually a little too powerful. I have to always stick to 1st or 2nd gear to not break the speed limits (30kmh in most areas, 50 on the bigger roads) and the battery actually drains because I don't drive it enough for its demand. I'm seriously thinking of getting an Enfield and I'm looking at the 350 and 650 you compare above - and gearing more towards the 350 because of both the price, lovely looks, and improved handling which is ideal for our narrow roads and tight bends/roundabouts (that the Harley sometimes finds tricky). Your video review helps. Thanks.
There's a new version of the interceptor and continental gt that now have mag wheels, blacked-out engine and exhaust, and i believe new hand switches/controls. Basically, a hunter 650.
Good one - Ive owned a Classic 500, then a new classic 350 but after a couple of months couldnt keep up with hectic Sydney traffic so upgraded to the Interceptor - its a winner and just gets more character as you run it in...
I am a proud rider of Hunter 350 from September 2022, did couple of long rides as well. Very satisfied with the light weight body. Easy to maneuver in heavy traffic & the seat height being low ensures the vehicle is very stable in high speed lean. One more thing is the fuel efficiency is pretty high being the same J series engine compared to Meteor or Classis Reborn. I have come up with 38+ kms/L in Calcutta traffic & around 40+ kms/L with pillion in Indian highways. One issues definitely is in summer the heat kind of hits your legs. One big point is the engine is so smooth along with the gear ratio that there is absolutely no vibration. Definitely a must buy for people of my height 5 ft 7inch.
THey are rather different engines. The 349cc is a long stroke single cylinder.. The 650 twin has a shorter stroke in relation to bore size.. It will rev a little quicker and get full power at 7000 rpm instead of 6000 rpm for the Hunter.. Though both bikes are a bit neutered stock.. The 650 just needs a less restrictive air filter and exhaust .. and with a remap you can get 20% more power on the back wheel. In the UK a company is developing a new camshaft for the 350cc engine,, which unlocks a lot of power from that engine. A Hunter with 24hp and 30Nm would be a little more "fun".
Great comparison Rob. In my area, the interceptor is $1500-$2000USD more. I’d have to go with the Interceptor as I’m rural anyway so always highway speeds to go anywhere. As many have said, I like the look of the Hunter 350 better. RE makes such versatile bikes and easy to customize to the style you like.
A consideration…sure spend 4 grand more but you need to take In account , that 4 grand buys top end riding gear , servicing , pizza 20 times and lots of beers . I’ve gone back to smaller bikes , lighter , easier to keep to the speed limit and just pure enjoyment.
I keep looking at both. I think most of the time if you rode to the same destination on each bike you would get there at more or less the same time. The extra power only comes in when you want to over take on country roads but it never really buys you that much time. The weight difference is significant and i can easily flat foot and manhandle the hunter. As much as i like the interceptor i think it might put my back out shoving on and off the garden. And i probably wouldn't ride any faster. So I'm leaning towards the hunter atm
It’s focused on a different type of rider mate. I would not compare the two and focus more on to whom the bike is targeted. Its the sales work horse nowadays of RE.
My son has the interceptor 650 as his first bike while restricted however I think RE will sell heaps of these to learners and city people with that price tag. Great video mate.
I would choose the hunter if it had way better economy. Here in Tas the rego is the same price so that really means that if fuel consumption is similar one would have to pick Interceptor. Then I guess servicing ease and cost would come into it the calculation.
Interceptor is for the more spirited highway getaways. But if you want a Lil brother to the interceptor that's perfect for urban cruising, with the feel of the interceptor and the nimbleness of an effing tricycle, On budget. Like myself. Hunter 350 is no pushaway
Thank you. This is exactly the comparison I’ve been looking for. I’m a mature rider who’s had small but mostly 750’s and I was afraid the 350 just wouldn’t cut it
Hey @ThrottleDownunder, I'm curious. Is the sound of the fuel pump while driving loud or normal? Mine seems a bit loud , so I wanted to see if you could give some feedback. Thank you!
Great review mate. I am a big fan of Royal Enfields 350 range. But if I only had one bike in the garage, I too would go for the Interceptor over the Hunter. But with a large capacity bike in the garage already, I think ther Hunter would get the nod over the interceptor.
I tried the 650 and it rides like an old bike compared to my Kawa Z900, which was a surprise to discover that my powerful bike feels so agile compared to the Enfield 650. I would love to have a 350 if it feels more agile than the 650.
Interceptor all the way. I've had mine 5 months and am still in love. Custom exhaust and DNA air filter plus a remap of the ECU makes it like a 650 Yamaha from the 70's. A wonderful note, snappy response to the throttle and yes a head turner with its chrome tank and back off burble.
The Hunter and the Interceptor both, look to be great beginner bikes. But I would have to go for the Interceptor for the same reasons you mentioned. Both look good though... although... Maybe it's an optical illusion cause of the paint scheme, but the seat on the Hunter looks very large on that bike!! Good video Rob!!
Agree.. but not because of the seat, I think the problem is the frame, the back part to be specific, I think a couple more inches on the back would have been more visually appealing.. Making the back wheel more separated to the frame.. if you look similar bikes like the triumph street twin (similar in design) it is more visually appealing for that reason.. there is a space between the back wheel and the frame, it makes it look lighter, more "sportive"..sorry for my English.
My interceptor is the minimum level of performance I expect from a road going motorcycle. Mostly commute on it and its been absolutely reliable over the past couple of years. The '60's styling is very good. I've ridden a 350 (meteor) but found I was wringing its neck the whole time in city traffic. If you have decades of big bike experience the 350's will probably be too feeble. Conversely, I've punted bikes with twice the interceptors capacity in city traffic everyday for over a million kilometres and never thought they were overkill, perhaps it goes both ways?
Hunter good looking bike 0 to 50 mph guess around 14 seconds. Slower than most cars. £4000 in UK £2000 in India... Reliability still unknown on this model.
Love your comments but it's a Great bike not just learners but for all .The days of Super Fast are coming to the end and Bikers know this! The Intercepter just hit's that sweet spot and it's hurting Triumph and Harley in a big way!!
I do not think this is a right comparison People will go for the Hunter because of its affordability and lighter weight. Interceptor is very expensive and totally a different beast in terms of power fig ur es
Be interesting to see if the rumoured 450 liquid cooled Himalayan makes an appearance, as the again "rumoured" 40 hp output would make me prick my ears up if they offered a Hunter type version of that.
Hunter is 100MPG, interceptor 70MPG, Interceptor has a taco. Interceptor parallel twin is a cross plane crank, with serious character and the firing order of a 90 degree V-twin. I think the fuel economy is worth mentioning but a good comparison all the same mate.
Top vid Rob, this is a much needed comparison of these two bikes, it’ll help out new bike buyers for sure 👍 I’m definitely in the Interceptor camp, not because it’s bigger and better, it just suits me better Cheers 😎
![Destroying Japanese Equipment After WWII - Saishu Island (Jeju-Do) October 1945 [ WWII Documentary ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qm1cYJy3hjI/mqdefault.jpg)
Hunter 350 or Interceptor 650 for you?
Agreed with you Rob! If i could only afford a $8000 bike then yeah go for the Hunter (or Meteor :D ) but if the pocket allows, then the 650 is the way to go!
Hunter 👍
I Want a Hunter with 650cc
650 anyday
I need both. I've had an Interceptor for 4 years. You're right it's incredibly versatile. I don't really need the Hunter so maybe I just want the thrill of new bike ownership 😅
This is why i got them both , and i can tell you the interceptor is fantastic and really good value for money !! the Hunter 350 so much fun to ride (so nimble) and isnt that what its all about ?
I have an Interceptor, but I really like the aesthetic of the Hunter....... I really think something along the lines of a 660cc Single Hunter would be an absolute hoot to ride!
I saw the hunter for the first time day before yesterday night and saw the interceptor 650 yesterday again for the first time close up I've seen years ago but never a bike guy so you know but I liked it ,,, compared to both love the interceptor like really nice
You won t believe but that bike will come end of this year. it will named: Sherpa
@@Dagehtslang I'll look forward to seeing that one. :)
Ah.....I thought that would be too good to be true....It is using the twin engine. :(
@@captainklutz3427 you can google first pictures!! Sherpa Royal enfield (unofficial secret spottet)
Meteor 350 and interceptor 650 owner here. The meteor is a far better heavy traffic commuter, and gets ridden far more often than the interceptor. Doesn't mess up your shoes as well because of the heel shifter. You're right, the interceptor has more oomph, but you can't squeeze it all in heavy traffic, can you? Interceptor has more power for highway speeds but barely, imho, and it's also too cramped for longer rides, and the seat is terrible. For highway involving one or more day trips, i always go for other options other than the interceptor. Nice bike, but any of the 350 variants will make a better commuter and for longer trips better 60 or more hp, wind protection and more leg room. For me, the 350 platform is a clear winner
@@breadgarlichouse2265 do whatever you like, is your money. All I'm saying, is that it depends on what you want to do with it. Want the one and only bike between the two? Better go for the interceptor. Can afford both? Meteor is a better city commuter. Where do you want to go 160 km/h, by the way? It it's in the track, go for something else. In the city? Impossible. In the highway? Then go for something else as well.
Fwiw, both bikes are relatively slow. Meteor is slower, but in the heavy city traffic, you just can't tell the difference anyways.
@@breadgarlichouse2265 forget it, he's a know-it-all expert who confuses opinions with fact. I ride my interceptor in heavy traffic all the time and when out of town it's more than fast enough for the highway and country roads.
LIVING BEING IS OUR RACE, MANKIND IS OUR RELIGION, HINDU,MUSLIM,SIKH,CHRISTAIN, THERE IS NO SEPARATE RELIGION
ALMIGHTY GOD KABIR is the father of all souls that JESUS, MOHAMMAD, GURU NANAK, VEDH was telling in BIBLE, QURAN, GURU GRANTHA SAHEB
Almighty God KABIR is the CREATOR OF all SOULS -- SAINT RAMPALJI MAHARAJ
@@breadgarlichouse2265 in india you'll get fine, for overspeding on every speed cam you going through, here maximum limit is 100kmh
I bought the Hunter. I think the second one sold in Adelaide in December. I love it. Didn't quite have enough pocket money for the Interceptor . . . maybe in a couple of years. See what Royal Enfield come out with by then. Cheers
Same
Royal Enfield has never pulled me, but the loyal following it has… must admit it intrigues me. There is a dealership not far from me, I think I just might have to go check them out.
20bhp versus 47bhp is more than double. I prefer the look of the 350 Royal Enfield range to the Interceptor but as you say the Interceptor is far better on the highway. The mostly 110kph highway Australia speed limits would stretch the Hunter’s limits especially for extended periods. For a great looking urban bike it’s hard to go past a Royal Enfield 350 but for a purely practical urban bike you can’t beat a motor scooter. Most have generous luggage capacity, nothing beats an automatic in heavy traffic, you don’t cop the heat from the engine or exhaust sitting in traffic and you get better weather protection than what the Enfield offers on those rainy days. Enjoyed this video👍.
In cities scooters are unbeatable
You make a good point with the "bigger and better" - I currently drive an 883cc Harley but mostly drive in my urban 3 sq mile city - it's actually a little too powerful. I have to always stick to 1st or 2nd gear to not break the speed limits (30kmh in most areas, 50 on the bigger roads) and the battery actually drains because I don't drive it enough for its demand. I'm seriously thinking of getting an Enfield and I'm looking at the 350 and 650 you compare above - and gearing more towards the 350 because of both the price, lovely looks, and improved handling which is ideal for our narrow roads and tight bends/roundabouts (that the Harley sometimes finds tricky). Your video review helps. Thanks.
Hunter has sold about 100,000 units in India since it was launched. So, Hunter is very popular with bikers.
The 650 in the hunter chassis would rock.
There's a new version of the interceptor and continental gt that now have mag wheels, blacked-out engine and exhaust, and i believe new hand switches/controls. Basically, a hunter 650.
@@Thunder_Bear_mg Better: There is coming the RE Sherpa! And this Ladies and Gents is the HUNTER with a big MOTOR!! End of the year! Boom!
There’s not much price difference considering what you get with interceptor but in India the 650’s cost almost twice to Hunter
Good one - Ive owned a Classic 500, then a new classic 350 but after a couple of months couldnt keep up with hectic Sydney traffic so upgraded to the Interceptor - its a winner and just gets more character as you run it in...
I am a proud rider of Hunter 350 from September 2022, did couple of long rides as well. Very satisfied with the light weight body. Easy to maneuver in heavy traffic & the seat height being low ensures the vehicle is very stable in high speed lean. One more thing is the fuel efficiency is pretty high being the same J series engine compared to Meteor or Classis Reborn. I have come up with 38+ kms/L in Calcutta traffic & around 40+ kms/L with pillion in Indian highways. One issues definitely is in summer the heat kind of hits your legs. One big point is the engine is so smooth along with the gear ratio that there is absolutely no vibration. Definitely a must buy for people of my height 5 ft 7inch.
Great Video! I went the Interceptor 650 with S&S 865cc kit and am not looking back!
THey are rather different engines. The 349cc is a long stroke single cylinder.. The 650 twin has a shorter stroke in relation to bore size.. It will rev a little quicker and get full power at 7000 rpm instead of 6000 rpm for the Hunter.. Though both bikes are a bit neutered stock.. The 650 just needs a less restrictive air filter and exhaust .. and with a remap you can get 20% more power on the back wheel.
In the UK a company is developing a new camshaft for the 350cc engine,, which unlocks a lot of power from that engine. A Hunter with 24hp and 30Nm would be a little more "fun".
it looks awesome as compare to other models of RE😍😍😍😍😍
Royal Enfield has some nice bikes for the price!! Fun thumpers!! I think I like the looks of the Hunter !! More Horses!!
Good review mate I’m going to be doing a review on this bike soon for my channel. We need more Australian motorcycle channels. Keep it up. 👌👌
Great comparison Rob. In my area, the interceptor is $1500-$2000USD more. I’d have to go with the Interceptor as I’m rural anyway so always highway speeds to go anywhere. As many have said, I like the look of the Hunter 350 better. RE makes such versatile bikes and easy to customize to the style you like.
Nice review Rob!
Would be a fun bike to ride I think……
I’ll take both!
Awesome review mate thanks for sharing 😊😊😊
Triumph missing a trick not going for the lower capacity market, retro Tiger 90 (350cc) from 60's would be great.
Totally agree. I've said this for a while. Bring out a new tiger cub. Also honda should bring out the highess in other markets
Interceptor for me !! but it wouldn’t hurt my feelings to have both in the garage.
How many bikes are too many ?
A consideration…sure spend 4 grand more but you need to take In account , that 4 grand buys top end riding gear , servicing , pizza 20 times and lots of beers . I’ve gone back to smaller bikes , lighter , easier to keep to the speed limit and just pure enjoyment.
As a commuter and as a second bike, Hunter all day everyday for me
I keep looking at both.
I think most of the time if you rode to the same destination on each bike you would get there at more or less the same time.
The extra power only comes in when you want to over take on country roads but it never really buys you that much time.
The weight difference is significant and i can easily flat foot and manhandle the hunter.
As much as i like the interceptor i think it might put my back out shoving on and off the garden. And i probably wouldn't ride any faster.
So I'm leaning towards the hunter atm
It’s focused on a different type of rider mate. I would not compare the two and focus more on to whom the bike is targeted. Its the sales work horse nowadays of RE.
I agree 100%. But I was asked to compare the 2 for my viewers that asked for it. 🤙👍🤣
My son has the interceptor 650 as his first bike while restricted however I think RE will sell heaps of these to learners and city people with that price tag. Great video mate.
Thanks mate. Really enjoying your content too
Nice review Rob. Interesting comparison.
I would choose the hunter if it had way better economy. Here in Tas the rego is the same price so that really means that if fuel consumption is similar one would have to pick Interceptor. Then I guess servicing ease and cost would come into it the calculation.
For city rides - hunter, less power with max 80mph. For highway, hilly rides - interceptor, bigger engine more power.
Interceptor is for the more spirited highway getaways. But if you want a Lil brother to the interceptor that's perfect for urban cruising, with the feel of the interceptor and the nimbleness of an effing tricycle, On budget. Like myself. Hunter 350 is no pushaway
Thank you. This is exactly the comparison I’ve been looking for. I’m a mature rider who’s had small but mostly 750’s and I was afraid the 350 just wouldn’t cut it
not sure y ...RE motors always come with lower power if comparing with others brand with same CC ...under power bike
The extra $4k puts the interceptor in competition with other great bikes such as Suzuki SV650, Vulcan S, CF Moto CLX 700 Adventure, KLR650,
Hey @ThrottleDownunder, I'm curious. Is the sound of the fuel pump while driving loud or normal? Mine seems a bit loud , so I wanted to see if you could give some feedback. Thank you!
A 20hp 350 is a non-starter for me. Their bikes look great but they are seriously underpowered...a sin in this day and age.
Excellent test!! another point The Interceptor 650 has slipper clutch
There is an Interceptor in my garage however if I went on looks only, it would be the Hunter
Hello! This bike arrives here in Brazil in 1 month. What's your height? Great video
May I know, what is your height sir? Thnks
177cm 🤙
Great review mate. I am a big fan of Royal Enfields 350 range. But if I only had one bike in the garage, I too would go for the Interceptor over the Hunter. But with a large capacity bike in the garage already, I think ther Hunter would get the nod over the interceptor.
I like the hunter, but to me, the rear wheel appears to be way too far forward.
I tried the 650 and it rides like an old bike compared to my Kawa Z900, which was a surprise to discover that my powerful bike feels so agile compared to the Enfield 650. I would love to have a 350 if it feels more agile than the 650.
I just bought a Hunter. I wish the gas tank was narrower, as a new rider, the fuel shifting from side to side is pretty jarring, Yes I'm a pussy.
Hm… do either of these bikes fit comfortably for someone 5’6?
Interceptor all the way. I've had mine 5 months and am still in love. Custom exhaust and DNA air filter plus a remap of the ECU makes it like a 650 Yamaha from the 70's. A wonderful note, snappy response to the throttle and yes a head turner with its chrome tank and back off burble.
Which engine best stirs the soul and evokes love?
Obviously, take the interceptor if you can afford it, in which not many people can.
I guess as I'm 6ft 4" (1.93m) would have to go for the Interceptor??
The hunter looks better. I'm an Aussie here in the UK, and I'd have the Hunter. Comparing these two is an odd one. But good vid.
The Hunter and the Interceptor both, look to be great beginner bikes. But I would have to go for the Interceptor for the same reasons you mentioned.
Both look good though... although... Maybe it's an optical illusion cause of the paint scheme, but the seat on the Hunter looks very large on that bike!!
Good video Rob!!
Agree.. but not because of the seat, I think the problem is the frame, the back part to be specific, I think a couple more inches on the back would have been more visually appealing.. Making the back wheel more separated to the frame.. if you look similar bikes like the triumph street twin (similar in design) it is more visually appealing for that reason.. there is a space between the back wheel and the frame, it makes it look lighter, more "sportive"..sorry for my English.
My interceptor is the minimum level of performance I expect from a road going motorcycle. Mostly commute on it and its been absolutely reliable over the past couple of years. The '60's styling is very good. I've ridden a 350 (meteor) but found I was wringing its neck the whole time in city traffic. If you have decades of big bike experience the 350's will probably be too feeble.
Conversely, I've punted bikes with twice the interceptors capacity in city traffic everyday for over a million kilometres and never thought they were overkill, perhaps it goes both ways?
love it
Hunter good looking bike 0 to 50 mph guess around 14 seconds. Slower than most cars. £4000 in UK £2000 in India... Reliability still unknown on this model.
How tall are you mate? I’m 185cm 6”1’ ish and the Interceptor is great for my height. Like the look of the hunter but think it might be too small?
I'm 177cm mate.it is a little bit smaller than the 650 in size
Love your comments but it's a Great bike not just learners but for all .The days of Super Fast are coming to the end and Bikers know this! The Intercepter just hit's that sweet spot and it's hurting Triumph and Harley in a big way!!
Nice, Rob. Good comparison, mate. Yeah, I reckon they look cool, love the retro look. Cheers
I do not think this is a right comparison
People will go for the Hunter because of its affordability and lighter weight.
Interceptor is very expensive and totally a different beast in terms of power fig ur es
Be interesting to see if the rumoured 450 liquid cooled Himalayan makes an appearance, as the again "rumoured" 40 hp output would make me prick my ears up if they offered a Hunter type version of that.
It is 4000! extra, lot of extra hours. For 4000 you can buy a lot of petrol as well to get places
If you rarely go out of the town/city the 350 is fine, if you do then the 650 would be the better bike.
Hunter is 100MPG, interceptor 70MPG, Interceptor has a taco. Interceptor parallel twin is a cross plane crank, with serious character and the firing order of a 90 degree V-twin. I think the fuel economy is worth mentioning but a good comparison all the same mate.
Think you missed the running cost in terms of fuel, oil and service ect Intercepter is twice the bike but carries a higher running cost
nothing that a good fire wouldn't sort out gutless wonder, great ornament and good to look at, even better coated in carbon deposits
"47hp is almost double 20hp"? Hmmm, almost eh ;)
Excellent!
either this bike is too small for you or you are too big for the bike!
I believe it's a matter of use. Both are amazing, but not made for everyone
I wonder if RE will bring a bigger Hunter? Or would that be too much like the Interceptor?
what would be the best option for 5 feet 4 inch person ?
Definitely the Hunter 350 I think, as long as you don't mind the smaller motor
@@ThrottleDownunder Thank you mate.
Top vid Rob, this is a much needed comparison of these two bikes, it’ll help out new bike buyers for sure 👍
I’m definitely in the Interceptor camp, not because it’s bigger and better, it just suits me better
Cheers 😎
I’m a reel fan of the Classic line, I’d buy a 350 Classic for sure 😎
4:22 "Almost" double? Is that Aussie math?
Learner in UK is 125cc max 😢
hunter 650 ?? on its way i expect ;;
As a tall rider I'm always worried about a shorter wheelbase
With the Hunter you have to include the cost of repainting it.. the color schemes are terrible.
"Only" $4000 more = 50% more expensive.
Also the Hunter will use a lot less fuel - it will consistently do 2.5-3 litres/100km.
The price range gap is huge.. Why compare the 2🤣
Really? can we compare two motorcycles with such difference in displacement and price? really now!
In India its only for $273 aud😂
I want this so badly
Get both 🤗🤣
Cool..
I have this version of hunter.. It is hot and yummy. ✌️😐
😬
Azul
Hunter is slow,650 should be the right choice
The interceptor is a very heavy bike so the power comparison is not so relevant
The Hunter is a fun bike for lighter riders
Interceptor,no doubt! Or both , they are so beutiful and good motorcycles !
The 650 is a great second bike. The 350 a third bike. No way I would ever chose the Hunter over an INT