I just can't imagine what he wold say about COVID19 and what's behind that. He would be probably be censored like Robert Kennedy Jr.! I miss him... i read almost all of his books and i'm also writing my final dissertation about him, he deserves it because since he came into my life i realized i wasn't crazy :D ! When he died i burst into tears...like i lost a father and a mentor
@@alphaetomega9887 yes, a great loss. here is the guy he mentioned, Reid Bryson. i wonder if MC was his sponsor? worth a gander: th-cam.com/video/rzYfJP-HWcQ/w-d-xo.html
Yeah, I mean they would probably censor him ... If I am fronting COVID the way i am, trying to understand what's going on from different points of view, it's thanks to him and the way he taught us to research about an argument and to deal with it .
Eerie seeing how right Michael Crichton was as people 10 year later would move even further away from verifiable data when talking about scientific points. Michael Crichton was a very insightful man, and much like the rest of the all time great science fiction writers, has a haunting ability to predict the direction of humanity and society.
I met Crichton once. This interview is often awkward, but I still love watching Charlie interrogate Doc. The constant, contrasting disagreement between them is fascinating.
It feels very validating to have Michael Critchen share my views on the global warming debate and on the direction of modern science. It’s a very unpopular position and I think he hit the nail on the head as to why.
I would still be more interested in hearing Michael Crichton's complete answer on fewer questions than only hearing half of the answer on almost every single question that was asked.
"Nobody can predict the future." is something a real scientist and logical thinker says. Charlie Rose shows so much bias and ignorance arguing for consensus science. Michael Crichton demonstrates pure genius in his response to the stupid questions about global warming. He must have been the only person to say Al Gore is wrong!
Michael's points very much foreshadowed the emergence of such dreadful attitudes as, for example, New Scientist suggesting that perhaps those who don't agree with the global warming concensus should be medicated (after more than 20 years as a NS print subscriber, I am ending my subscription; the magazine has become incredibly leftist, even communist, eg. not long ago it ran an 8-page pro-immigration special, and was blatantly pro-Hillary during the US election). It's shocking that Charlie could not see the obvious point that whenever a vast amount of state controlled money is going to be available for a particular thing, there will be enormous pressure to promote that thing, regardless of its factual merit, and collosal fraud and lies perpetrated to gain access to that money. Charlie's reactions are surprisingly emotional, identical to the modern mass mindset that everyone must tow the line, or else be publicly shamed (Charlie's approach with his questions was to try and make Michael *feel bad* for not agreeing, rather than actually respond to what Michael was saying). All this hysteria about "climate change" (funny how they don't call it global warming anymore), yet the UN promotes huge population increases in precisely those 3rd world nations that are least able to cope with it (ie. more resource consumption), nations everywhere make use of state borrowing to perpetuate the myth of future pensions (more unfunded resource consumption, literally taking money from those not yet born), at the same time encouraging vast migrations of people from 3rd world to 1st world countries (especially Europe) where their carbon consumption goes up by an order of magnitude. The politicians claim to care, yet they do nothing to prevent the awful increases in violent crime, rapes and abuse that have occured in places such as Europe as a result of these migratory policies (indeed they actively encourage these problems, funded by people like Soros). It's poliical virtue signaling gone mad, largely exploiting the emotion-based voting habits of women to force through disastrous policies. Why on earth should I give a damn about whatever the climate might be doing in a hundred years, when the people in my nation are suffering *right now* from real, everyday events? (terrorism, grooming gangs, etc.) Fact is, the alarmist predictions of the early global warming conferences simply have not come true at all. I remember telling people about them at the time, hey the sea levels are going to be 2m higher within 30 years! The predictions were wrong, but the narrative language has changed, and now political power is behind a giant money machine to ram through all sorts of measures despite totally contradictory policies elsewhere. The UN cares about people? Then why the heck does Saudia Arabia have any influence on the commision for women's rights? It cares about children? Why is it encouraging the spread of a backwards ideological religion with terrible attitudes toward children across Europe? Scandals such as Rotherham, Telford & the murder of Lee Rigby did not have to happen, and certainly nobody voted for the changes which made them possible. I attended a global warming conference about 10 years ago which focused on cloud cover and oceans. At the end of it, the overwhelming concensus was, we just don't know, the various factors involved are so complicated (back then, ocean absorption of CO2, the effect of cloud cover on light reflectance, etc., were unknowns, and these still haven't been resolved). Since then, I have become more aware of the way in which any studies that contradict the concensus are supressed, resuts of studies have been changed, often data is selectively used, data that doesn't fit is excluded, or sometimes outright fabricated. Academics are expected to reaffirm what is already been decided upon. Rock the boat and you lose your research funding. There are lucrative academic careers at stake in all this, numerous research grants, public money thrown about like candy and plenty of people willing to do whatever it takes to get their hands on it. I've seen what academics can be like when significant money is potenially available for something, they are addicted to free stuff from the state. One lecturer even said to me, "Can't they just give us the money and then we'll decide what to do with it?". So I'm with MC on this one (unlike my doom-laden vocal opinions of 20 years ago). Is there warming? Yes. Are humans at least partly responsible? Probably. Is it significant compared to eras past? No. So does it really matter? No, certainly not compared to far more immediate problems, which include the potential collapse of western culture amid a demographic flood far more devastating than that from any melting ice cap. We can survive nasty weather events; we cannot surive cultural destruction and religious dogmatic slavery that could last hundreds of years, especially not when our own politicians are celebrating such cultural destruction (as they have done in various nations across western Europe). The modern hysteria about "climate change" has nothing to do with preventing future harm; now it's only about people getting their hands on free stuff, influence, political power, and the aims of globalists and other people & groups who exploit these events. The state of the climate a century hence does not concern me at all so long as there are so many politicians and individuals who would have us go down a path that leads to Venezuela-stlye chaos.
@@mapesdhs597 Please, wait for English translation ofHistory of Anti-culture by Krzysztof Karon. Brilliant mind. You may enjoy and appreciate it. He explains the world we live in. He figured out why things are the way they are.
RJ Thomas if he was alive today he would probably change his viewpoint on whether global warming is catastrophic. Evidence is mounting and definitely mountainous. Global warming is an impending danger, those who deny it are misinformed and or incapable of seeing reason. climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
at noon the other day the authorities announced that they would be closing our main highway at 6PM due to snow they predicted would be falling at that time. then a very tall american indian (probably related to MC, they were the same height) walked up to me and looked down and said, “Predicting when the sun will shine, is like predicting the future.” and then he strolled away.
What’s even spookier is that in the first Jurassic park novel the dna read out for the raptors says the three letters r n a. He knew what was coming next
"Because I'm a science fiction author, the far out doesn't appeal to me." Crichton understands the willing suspension of disbelief. He's been 'out there' he's not impressed by it until it's real.
I think, at least to some degree, in my view, Crichton's stance on this matter is proven with the fact that now in 2016, the topic of Global warming has seemingly lost most of it's frenzy that it had back then. Nobody's talking about it anymore, at least not nearly like they were at this time. But the problem hasn't gone away. Global warming hasn't stopped or that is to say; nobody's figured anything out. We're seemingly not immensely wiser then we were then yet the topic lost it's stamina. Why? Like he said; people line up for the catastrophe. People like to talk and bitch about problems. Nobody actually wants to DO anything about it. People just want the end of the world to come.
Every human group through time has seemingly been eager as all hell to be the last living group, despite a biological propensity to breed. So messed up. How flawed are we that we destined to treat our environment as disposable and yet our DNA is built to keep making more?
Crichton is a massive inspiration 33 Cm is NOT 20 feet. And thats the IPCC. All you have to do is look at the Tide Gauge Data. Still no Acceleration, even, anywhere. It takes like 30 sec to check the actual Observations.
Now I wish that NEXT was Made into a Film/Movie.... But.... I'm told the problem with NEXT Being Adapted into a film, is the fact, that the Movie about a subject, "Genetic Research." really isn't what people understand or care much for.... and most of the subplots are Dull, and Meandering, and most of the stories Characters are Bland, and uninteresting. Another Problem is that the Story itself, has No Protagonist who Narrates the story. The whole novel, has a broad Narrative that all the things and characters were placed in.... :( and sadly, This Novel NEXT would have to be "Altered." like the Novel won't be adapted into a film anytime soon unless it undergoes a Re-write so much so, that they would have to change the nature of the entire story Unfortunately.
There is another book by Crichton that's coming out this/next year. They keep finding scripts on his hard drive.... though they are all so crappy that I have difficulties believing that he has actually written them.
@@davidusa47 the more i see this mechanism of power among human society the more i believe this brilliant mind was killed.Thats a terrible idea..i llove his books so much yet all people know is Jurassic park.Idiocracy rules this world
Michael Crichton was so tolerant of all the fools. The interviewer is supposed to be the one with objectivity and tolerance but Charlie Rose was pathetically biased in this case and Crichton just let it role off like some enlightened yogi. Amazing. So had the he died
Charlie Rose is so insecure. He's more interested in showing off what he knows about a topic than just letting Michael Crichton tell his thoughts and stories. What a wasted opportunity.
yeah, the man who saw the future. check any title. The Andromeda Strain (1969) “A thriller about a team of scientists who are investigating a deadly extraterrestrial microorganism that rapidly and fatally clots human blood.”
I would love to get michael's take on science making the claim that men can have periods. Look guys he callled the illumiinati out and they wacked his ass a few months after this interview in what was described as a brief battle with cancer.
Do you have any articles or videos covering this? I would be very interested to see them. He looks so healthy and vibrant in this interview. And then the irony of dying to cancer... It's like one of his plot lines. So sad. My favorite author ever. Wish he had finished his second autobiography.
"The more extreme elements (SJW's) and the media are not interested in a BALANCED perspective"... this was Michael Crichton at his best! These people ruined science and critical thinking... look the mess we are nowdays; Mr. Crichton was right... we miss this kind of reasonable and intelligent mind (and human being)...
Charlie likes to hear himself talk. He is not interviewing here. He is attacking. Charlie is supposed to get his guests to tell their opinions, not force his ideas onto the guest.
I’ll probably express the general opinion that the most famous American science fiction writers are Isaac Asimov and Ray Bradbury the first thing that pops up in my mind, but Crichton just started reading (ROY) the first time I heard about him this year and decided to read it and see if he reaches Azimov
This was obviously long before Center for Medical Progress and Planned Parenthood's involvement with Stem Express. And long before recent knowledge of the zinc spark at implantation. I wonder what he would have thought of that.
Also in the book he says the brain is not emphatically right or left. We public were supposed to be treated with biologics after this exploitative multi generational experimentation with patented pharma. Is not going to happen; the profits of pharma are too large to give up. Have you heard that the dental community was going to set aside mercury totally in exchange for an assistant dentist who will handle the low income segment by 2020.
Interesting take on global warming. Frankly it's hard to get scientist to agree on any certainty but i tend to agree that the transition to a greener economy was completely botched by unrealistically riding the prevailing doomsday momentum.
we are at the end of an ice age ... before the ice age the lower half Florida was under water .. when the ice age is over ... the lower half of Florida should be under water ... google: "Florida before the ice age"
@@killyourtelevision999 Ive been having trouble sleeping lately...thanks for this. the most boring shit ive read in a long time. Slept like a baby. You fly home now starling...
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
I wish that I could have met Michael Critchton and have talked to him in person... So many of the words that he has written have actually come true...
the joe rogan podcast that never happened :(
Like with this virus
I just can't imagine what he wold say about COVID19 and what's behind that. He would be probably be censored like Robert Kennedy Jr.! I miss him... i read almost all of his books and i'm also writing my final dissertation about him, he deserves it because since he came into my life i realized i wasn't crazy :D ! When he died i burst into tears...like i lost a father and a mentor
@@alphaetomega9887 well said brother
@@alphaetomega9887 yes, a great loss. here is the guy he mentioned, Reid Bryson. i wonder if MC was his sponsor? worth a gander: th-cam.com/video/rzYfJP-HWcQ/w-d-xo.html
One of the most intelligent and important authors of our time!
He reminds me so much of Nancy Pelosi.
You could create a drinking game out of how many times Charlie Rose cuts off Crichton as he's beginning to answering a question.
You would die from alcohol poisoning.
yeah, if you questions anybodies lame "computer modeling" scams they turn into rabid dogs. it is really weird. try it. i see it all day long. heh.
Michael Crichton knows what he is talking about
Thank you for uploading. MC was a great man. RIP my friend.
How I wish he was still here to witness this COVID disaster. I would love to hear his take on it.
Yeah, I mean they would probably censor him ... If I am fronting COVID the way i am, trying to understand what's going on from different points of view, it's thanks to him and the way he taught us to research about an argument and to deal with it .
@@alphaetomega9887
I love this video for jurassic world dominion new books
Eerie seeing how right Michael Crichton was as people 10 year later would move even further away from verifiable data when talking about scientific points. Michael Crichton was a very insightful man, and much like the rest of the all time great science fiction writers, has a haunting ability to predict the direction of humanity and society.
Very well said.
Hari Seldon himself
I met Crichton once. This interview is often awkward, but I still love watching Charlie interrogate Doc. The constant, contrasting disagreement between them is fascinating.
A very nice author, I admire him.
Thanks for the upload
RIP MC
On top of everything he was a doctor. Literally my hero
Well, he went to medical school. He never practiced medicine.
@@thesponge836 MD = doctor. Doesn't matter if he didn't practice.
@@thesponge836 getting the degree itself is going through all 7 rings of hell.
@@ggthewhale PLUS he managed to graduate from Harvard medical school summa cum laude.
great man and an author RIP MC
This dude was soooo far ahead of everyone. Notice he compares the genome to a cloud? What did we get a few years later? The cloud...
the man who saw the future.
Dude had the ring doorbell complete with video back in 1984 with the movie Runaway! I mean holy crap?!
It feels very validating to have Michael Critchen share my views on the global warming debate and on the direction of modern science. It’s a very unpopular position and I think he hit the nail on the head as to why.
he was wrong on that issue (not it's not dire or catastrophic), and had he lived, i think he would've come around
Michael was the most successful writer of novels made into popular films. Director. Physician
I’m guessing Stephen King is more successful.
I'm late discovering this interview, but would not have missed it! Many thanks to whomever posted this. Genes as an industry! Alarming and intriguing.
It's pretty obvious Rose does NOT want to believe Crichton.
Thank you so much for sharing this!
goddamn CR doesn't let Crichton speak...
It's because it was short-form. They only had 53 minutes, instead of the standard 2-3 hours like today's podcasts. Too bad Rogan can't interview MC...
I would still be more interested in hearing Michael Crichton's complete answer on fewer questions than only hearing half of the answer on almost every single question that was asked.
@@johnmeinderseeii7304 short-form is not a reason for leading questions that are obviously not what the interviewee was trying to start talking about.
@@johnmeinderseeii7304 Could you imagine that? Would have been unreal.
Michael Crichton is a LEGEND. Rest In Peace MC. He was the Messiah, Jesus Christ our lord. Praise him.
EA SPORTS axb I’m sorry my friend. Jesus is God’s son. I love MC ...but he wasn’t the son of God.
My favorite author period..
I loved Jurassic Park as a middle schooler. It captured my imagination and led to a respect of the scientific method and rationalism.
ditto!
yes me too!!
A brilliant and wonderful man and a wonderful bright interviewer. I meaningful interview of the like we need more in societies.
"Nobody can predict the future." is something a real scientist and logical thinker says. Charlie Rose shows so much bias and ignorance arguing for consensus science. Michael Crichton demonstrates pure genius in his response to the stupid questions about global warming. He must have been the only person to say Al Gore is wrong!
Michael's points very much foreshadowed the emergence of such dreadful attitudes as, for example, New Scientist suggesting that perhaps those who don't agree with the global warming concensus should be medicated (after more than 20 years as a NS print subscriber, I am ending my subscription; the magazine has become incredibly leftist, even communist, eg. not long ago it ran an 8-page pro-immigration special, and was blatantly pro-Hillary during the US election).
It's shocking that Charlie could not see the obvious point that whenever a vast amount of state controlled money is going to be available for a particular thing, there will be enormous pressure to promote that thing, regardless of its factual merit, and collosal fraud and lies perpetrated to gain access to that money. Charlie's reactions are surprisingly emotional, identical to the modern mass mindset that everyone must tow the line, or else be publicly shamed (Charlie's approach with his questions was to try and make Michael *feel bad* for not agreeing, rather than actually respond to what Michael was saying). All this hysteria about "climate change" (funny how they don't call it global warming anymore), yet the UN promotes huge population increases in precisely those 3rd world nations that are least able to cope with it (ie. more resource consumption), nations everywhere make use of state borrowing to perpetuate the myth of future pensions (more unfunded resource consumption, literally taking money from those not yet born), at the same time encouraging vast migrations of people from 3rd world to 1st world countries (especially Europe) where their carbon consumption goes up by an order of magnitude.
The politicians claim to care, yet they do nothing to prevent the awful increases in violent crime, rapes and abuse that have occured in places such as Europe as a result of these migratory policies (indeed they actively encourage these problems, funded by people like Soros). It's poliical virtue signaling gone mad, largely exploiting the emotion-based voting habits of women to force through disastrous policies. Why on earth should I give a damn about whatever the climate might be doing in a hundred years, when the people in my nation are suffering *right now* from real, everyday events? (terrorism, grooming gangs, etc.)
Fact is, the alarmist predictions of the early global warming conferences simply have not come true at all. I remember telling people about them at the time, hey the sea levels are going to be 2m higher within 30 years! The predictions were wrong, but the narrative language has changed, and now political power is behind a giant money machine to ram through all sorts of measures despite totally contradictory policies elsewhere. The UN cares about people? Then why the heck does Saudia Arabia have any influence on the commision for women's rights? It cares about children? Why is it encouraging the spread of a backwards ideological religion with terrible attitudes toward children across Europe? Scandals such as Rotherham, Telford & the murder of Lee Rigby did not have to happen, and certainly nobody voted for the changes which made them possible.
I attended a global warming conference about 10 years ago which focused on cloud cover and oceans. At the end of it, the overwhelming concensus was, we just don't know, the various factors involved are so complicated (back then, ocean absorption of CO2, the effect of cloud cover on light reflectance, etc., were unknowns, and these still haven't been resolved). Since then, I have become more aware of the way in which any studies that contradict the concensus are supressed, resuts of studies have been changed, often data is selectively used, data that doesn't fit is excluded, or sometimes outright fabricated. Academics are expected to reaffirm what is already been decided upon. Rock the boat and you lose your research funding. There are lucrative academic careers at stake in all this, numerous research grants, public money thrown about like candy and plenty of people willing to do whatever it takes to get their hands on it. I've seen what academics can be like when significant money is potenially available for something, they are addicted to free stuff from the state. One lecturer even said to me, "Can't they just give us the money and then we'll decide what to do with it?".
So I'm with MC on this one (unlike my doom-laden vocal opinions of 20 years ago). Is there warming? Yes. Are humans at least partly responsible? Probably. Is it significant compared to eras past? No. So does it really matter? No, certainly not compared to far more immediate problems, which include the potential collapse of western culture amid a demographic flood far more devastating than that from any melting ice cap. We can survive nasty weather events; we cannot surive cultural destruction and religious dogmatic slavery that could last hundreds of years, especially not when our own politicians are celebrating such cultural destruction (as they have done in various nations across western Europe). The modern hysteria about "climate change" has nothing to do with preventing future harm; now it's only about people getting their hands on free stuff, influence, political power, and the aims of globalists and other people & groups who exploit these events.
The state of the climate a century hence does not concern me at all so long as there are so many politicians and individuals who would have us go down a path that leads to Venezuela-stlye chaos.
@@mapesdhs597 Please, wait for English translation ofHistory of Anti-culture by Krzysztof Karon. Brilliant mind. You may enjoy and appreciate it. He explains the world we live in. He figured out why things are the way they are.
RJ Thomas if he was alive today he would probably change his viewpoint on whether global warming is catastrophic. Evidence is mounting and definitely mountainous. Global warming is an impending danger, those who deny it are misinformed and or incapable of seeing reason. climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
at noon the other day the authorities announced that they would be closing our main highway at 6PM due to snow they predicted would be falling at that time. then a very tall american indian (probably related to MC, they were the same height) walked up to me and looked down and said, “Predicting when the sun will shine, is like predicting the future.” and then he strolled away.
Owning a disease and the cure for that disease, having their own research companies...He is literally describing a certain person at the CDC now.
What’s even spookier is that in the first Jurassic park novel the dna read out for the raptors says the three letters r n a. He knew what was coming next
Great man.
"Because I'm a science fiction author, the far out doesn't appeal to me." Crichton understands the willing suspension of disbelief. He's been 'out there' he's not impressed by it until it's real.
I've read many Crichton books. The Great Train Robbery and Airframe were very good.
I think, at least to some degree, in my view, Crichton's stance on this matter is proven with the fact that now in 2016, the topic of Global warming has seemingly lost most of it's frenzy that it had back then. Nobody's talking about it anymore, at least not nearly like they were at this time. But the problem hasn't gone away. Global warming hasn't stopped or that is to say; nobody's figured anything out. We're seemingly not immensely wiser then we were then yet the topic lost it's stamina. Why? Like he said; people line up for the catastrophe. People like to talk and bitch about problems. Nobody actually wants to DO anything about it. People just want the end of the world to come.
Every human group through time has seemingly been eager as all hell to be the last living group, despite a biological propensity to breed. So messed up. How flawed are we that we destined to treat our environment as disposable and yet our DNA is built to keep making more?
Crichton is a massive inspiration 33 Cm is NOT 20 feet. And thats the IPCC. All you have to do is look at the Tide Gauge Data. Still no Acceleration, even, anywhere. It takes like 30 sec to check the actual Observations.
RIP Michael Crichton. NEXT was the last book published by Michael Crichton before he died in 2008.
Now I wish that NEXT was Made into a Film/Movie.... But.... I'm told the problem with NEXT Being Adapted into a film, is the fact, that the Movie about a subject, "Genetic Research." really isn't what people understand or care much for.... and most of the subplots are Dull, and Meandering, and most of the stories Characters are Bland, and uninteresting.
Another Problem is that the Story itself, has No Protagonist who Narrates the story. The whole novel, has a broad Narrative that all the things and characters were placed in.... :( and sadly, This Novel NEXT would have to be "Altered." like the Novel won't be adapted into a film anytime soon unless it undergoes a Re-write so much so, that they would have to change the nature of the entire story Unfortunately.
Technically Micro was the last book written (at least in part) by Mr.Crichton
brian clearly wrote published 😊
There is another book by Crichton that's coming out this/next year. They keep finding scripts on his hard drive.... though they are all so crappy that I have difficulties believing that he has actually written them.
did he say " Im gonna get killed for this"?
Michael Crichton: Died November 4, 2008 (aged 66)
Los Angeles, California, U.S.
I think he said “I might get killed for this” which is, frankly, more troubling. At 38:58
@@davidusa47 the more i see this mechanism of power among human society the more i believe this brilliant mind was killed.Thats a terrible idea..i llove his books so much yet all people know is Jurassic park.Idiocracy rules this world
@@davidusa47 I have pondered this for a long time. Do you think he might have?
Michael Crichton was so tolerant of all the fools. The interviewer is supposed to be the one with objectivity and tolerance but Charlie Rose was pathetically biased in this case and Crichton just let it role off like some enlightened yogi. Amazing. So had the he died
Charlie Rose is so insecure. He's more interested in showing off what he knows about a topic than just letting Michael Crichton tell his thoughts and stories. What a wasted opportunity.
He even says in the interview he would be killed for it
yeah, the man who saw the future. check any title. The Andromeda Strain (1969) “A thriller about a team of scientists who are investigating a deadly extraterrestrial microorganism that rapidly and fatally clots human blood.”
Charlie Rose won’t shut up.
I would love to get michael's take on science making the claim that men can have periods. Look guys he callled the illumiinati out and they wacked his ass a few months after this interview in what was described as a brief battle with cancer.
Do you have any articles or videos covering this? I would be very interested to see them. He looks so healthy and vibrant in this interview. And then the irony of dying to cancer... It's like one of his plot lines. So sad. My favorite author ever. Wish he had finished his second autobiography.
So, I guess this means a Masters Degree in Consensus Science isn't all that great after all..
“… if your model is good for 100 years, let’s see it run for 10.” Need anyone say more?
Odd @2:00 how it's exactly what seems to be the case with covid19
"The more extreme elements (SJW's) and the media are not interested in a BALANCED perspective"... this was Michael Crichton at his best! These people ruined science and critical thinking... look the mess we are nowdays; Mr. Crichton was right... we miss this kind of reasonable and intelligent mind (and human being)...
They probably killed him. RIP MC.
Have an axe to grind, Charlie?
I always wish charlie rose would stop interrupting the guests...very annoying.
this is unbelivable...i had no idea... where was the US Supreme Court on this!?!?
they killed him
Charlie likes to hear himself talk. He is not interviewing here. He is attacking. Charlie is supposed to get his guests to tell their opinions, not force his ideas onto the guest.
Was this his last interview?
Bjorn Lomborg is someone to look into after you see this :)
I’ll probably express the general opinion that the most famous American science fiction writers are Isaac Asimov and Ray Bradbury the first thing that pops up in my mind, but Crichton just started reading (ROY) the first time I heard about him this year and decided to read it and see if he reaches Azimov
So he died the year following this interview?
Yes he had Lymphoma and kept it quiet.
We miss Crichton so much. Since he only had a year left, I wonder if he knew he had cancer at this point?
Why couldn't Lymphoma have taken Charlie Rose instead?
laughed pretty hard at this.
terrible sentiment, bruno
Very Christian thing of you to say.
I like Charlie
Hard to believe he had terminal cancer at this point. He seems healthy.
Line Producer
AARON CLAR
Associate Line Producer
LYNNE MORGAN
So we would not be having the crisis we have today if the laws on virus patents had been canned . Non discloser should also be banned
This was obviously long before Center for Medical Progress and Planned Parenthood's involvement with Stem Express. And long before recent knowledge of the zinc spark at implantation. I wonder what he would have thought of that.
Wow Crichton got grilled hard in this interview : "what have you regretted?",
Is Charlie Rose talking down to him and trying to get under his skin? It's like, what have you done in your life, Charlie?
total misreading here
Died a year later of cancer
as did reid bryson, the man he mentions. i wonder if crichton was his sponsor? th-cam.com/video/rzYfJP-HWcQ/w-d-xo.html
Has anybody ever drawn a parallel between Crichton and Dickens?
HG Wells maybe
"We wanna hear disaster." - Michael Crichton
HIGH-RISE - Official Teaser Trailer - Starring Tom Hiddleston
th-cam.com/video/9dPp1PmNc5M/w-d-xo.html
Michael Crichton speaks from logic - Charlie is the standard liberal media with little or no facts. The story never changes.
some one more open minded should have interviewed this guy.
I also understand the platform.. but he brings up alot of interesting ideas. They should of been explored.
@@patrickhudson1185 "should of"?
open minded about what?
Also in the book he says the brain is not emphatically right or left.
We public were supposed to be treated with biologics after this exploitative multi generational experimentation with patented pharma. Is not going to happen; the profits of pharma are too large to give up. Have you heard that the dental community was going to set aside mercury totally in exchange for an assistant dentist who will handle the low income segment by 2020.
Interesting take on global warming. Frankly it's hard to get scientist to agree on any certainty but i tend to agree that the transition to a greener economy was completely botched by unrealistically riding the prevailing doomsday momentum.
Charlie boy looks soused here
Rest In Peace to Floyd Mayweather Stanley.
🙏
charlie rose is such a creep.
How right you are, even more so in retrospect!
@@jamesbowden4871 nah
because?
Pervert
Man, Charlie is annoying here. He unnecessarily tries to corner Michael. But Charlie gets defensive himself.
none of the above is true
It's all true
He is a Giant, ffs He is...
charlie rose might be one of the worst interviewers ever
Eric Midget lol.
we are at the end of an ice age ... before the ice age the lower half Florida was under water .. when the ice age is over ... the lower half of Florida should be under water ... google: "Florida before the ice age"
PBS is a joke.
Adult stem cells appear useful and viable...ethics is needed.
Lmai
העברית
TH-cam...please disable comments permanently.
Why?
Jason doesn’t like the eco Marxist orthodoxy questioned. So like all good liberals, he wants mass censorship.
@@killyourtelevision999 Ive been having trouble sleeping lately...thanks for this. the most boring shit ive read in a long time. Slept like a baby.
You fly home now starling...