Michael Crichton talks The Lost World w/ Charlie Rose (1995)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
- Author Michael Crichton promotes his novel "The Lost World" on the "Charlie Rose" show, September 22, 1995.
This video is for educational purposes. No copyright infringement intended.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
"Why is technology is shrinking the diversity of ideas?" They were talking about this 27 years ago. Wonder what they would say now?
Amazing many of the points he brings up 20 years ago are MAJOR issues in the mainstream today.
My all time favorite author. Such an incredibly intelligent man who was so far ahead of his time.
the way Michael talks is exactly how I imagined ian malcolm's voice before i saw the movie
Calvin’s Reptiles Ian Malcolm is the smartest man in his 1st JP novel!
Reaeding the novel, you definitely get the impression that Ian Malcolm is Crichton's author surrogate.
Yes it's 2021 when the books came out I was too young. But I am amazed after reading it this week. And when I heard him, that's what I was thinking!
Jurassic park and The Lost World are the best books in the World!
NickGaming_25 They are great indeed.
Yup. Sphere was really good too
👏👏👏 Agreed!
@@jsfbr I'm almost done with rising sun. Book was awesome from the get go
fr
This guy wasa giant in many ways; Ph.D in medicine, genius writer and a huge guy physically as well.
Medical Doctor with medical degree from Harvard.
Wtf I googled his height. Never knew that
my nigga went to harvard for fun, jurassic park is the shit... ill have to read the rest of books
I’m glad that I bought and read both Jurassic Park and The Lost World Novels they are incredible and amazing books.
This guy wore so many hats. Very talented individual... and TALL!
miss him :(
What a dashing gent he was!!
It's interesting that he seemed to already be thinking of state of fear even thought that book didn't come out for nine years.
As a writer myself, Ideas stay in mind forever until they're written down.
Sometimes it's just ideas that can't be strung together...yet
I just started writing my own novel about an island with dinosaurs and other animals even a 25th wolf 🐺 that lives on the island and that how’s i got inspired to write it and make it different than Jurassic Park or lost world novel cause I wanted it to be story for me .
Crichton was obviously a very intelligent guy. Society has dumbed down so much since the 90s. He was a real free thinker not blinded by politics. Especially his view on feminism. There’s no one talking sense like Crichton these days.
I'm curious, what were his views on feminism? I've never read about that
We aren’t dumber, but the discourse is.
@@NateTrucker92 I haven't either, but if you go by his view on environmentalism as a religion, that should give you some insight. Look up "remarks to the commonwealth club." It's about the subject of environmentalism as a religion, and the environmentalist viewpoint has always been one of feminism. I imagine if he spoke about it, that it would be similar, but maybe with some other interesting points.
This Interview is GOLD!
What a great interview.
I read the novel Jurassic Park in 5 days and the Lost World in 4 days!
This guy is really amazing I am a huge fan of Jurassic park and have been since my 10th birthday he is sadly missed we all miss you Micheal R.I.P.
They should have included the raptors attacking the high hide scene in the movie
I read just about all of his novels as a teen and the first Jurassic Park is the only one that really hit it out of the park as a movie for me (The Andromeda Strain and 13th Warrior were good, though). It still annoys me my favorite of his novels, Sphere, turned out so bad as a movie. Since Hollywood is only capable of rebooting and remaking these days they should take another shot at that one.
mightisright Yeah, Sphere is my favorite too and the film was abominable. It's a quintessential novel though: all the great aspects would be so hard to capture in a movie. No excuse for the trash they hit us with, though. I was in 8th grade when it came out and so excited it was being made into a film, and I just was so mad. If a 13 year old hates a big budget, big name adaptation of one of his all-time favorite novels, the movie clearly *sucks*. Even today, I often feel like I enjoyed a bad movie until I have a couple days to think about it but that one had me mad as I was leaving the theater.
Sphere was my favorite. I hope HBO tv series does it justice
Annoyingly, Sphere is not available on Kindle. Which stops me enjoying it.
it's a shame all the great story and discussion in crichton's book (both first and second) were really diluted to almost nothing in the films!
They're both great. I call them the secret great American novels
Well they normally don't make 10 hour films! But yes, I agree with you For the most part. There are some great, intelligent rants made by Malcolm that rivaled his lunchtime spat with Hammond in the first one. In the second one, most of the heavy dialogue is given by Thorne and Levine, who do not appear in the movie, unfortunately.
Totally agree. If they followed the book in the second film, it would have been received much better. The story line in the movie is far-reaching and difficult to accept as believable.
I loved the books. I did enjoy the first movie, the second one was too different to the book, and that San Diego part just ruined the movie for me.
I want a film of just Hammond and Wu's discussions on genetics
Any way we could get a high quality upload from Charlie roses website?
I loved the book.. but they didn't use the best parts of the book in the movie. Esp the characterization of Sarah
I think Charlie Rose has a terrible habit of trying to finish the interviewee's sentences and put his words in his/her mouth. He never just asks a question outright; he has to halfway answer it for them in three different ways before he finally shuts up.
I'm not sure about his other interviews.. but definitely in this one.
You know it's not an engaging interview when the interviewer does that. Charlie definitely did, but I think it's because he was completely unprepared for the way Crichton speaks. Crichton speaks often in a low voice, he pauses for contemplation or emphasis, and chooses his words carefully. Charlie wanted the conversation to go as he imagines it's supposed to in his head so that's why he filled in so many words.
+Sunny Parmar i agree, there was times Crichton would just stare on silence, so i feel like Charlie was trying to instigate Crichton to talk more
They were best friends.
Agreed. Several points you could see Crichton had a longer, thought-out path he was navigating in a complex answer, and Groper McGee cut him off and changed topic by glomming on to an offhand remark that was just an element of Crichton's response. Like the part about becoming either a surgeon or a psychiatrist, and before Michael could talk about the allure Psychiatry had for him at all, Rose is off asking him about directing films because of a metaphor Crichton made between being a boat captain and a movie director (and a surgeon). It's like: let the goddamn genius answer your question, and stop sexually harassing women who work for you!
He was a renaissance man!
Possibly the most intelligent, attractive, charismatic man alive. Enough about me. Now, Mr. Crichton is an amazing example of no limits success.
I bet he felt amazing after that intro they gave him. I would feel like God.
Jurassic Park lost world are one of my favorite books . I’ve read Jurassic Park 7 times and the lost world 5 times . I’m excited to read Jurassic Park for the 8th time and 6th time for lost world and again next year for Jurassic world dominon
The sequel was a mistake. Jurassic Park in itself as a novel and film stands perfectly.
Sigh......
9.27 😯
There have been three science fiction series/titles that have been formative in my worldview: Robert A. Heinlein's juvenile fiction (especially _Tunnel in the Sky_ and _Starship Troopers_ , the latter of which was originally written as a juvenile title), Joss Whedon's _Firefly_ , and Michael Crichton's _Jurassic Park/The Lost World_ . All three have led me to a general outlook of Hayekian evolutionary libertarianism (moderated in more recent years by the authoritarianism of Metternich as I've grown to recognize the problems with conventional libertarianism in the light of Game Theory--namely that socialists are alway-defectors who can't be counted on to observe the NAP, even in iterative play).
Even if he was right about a lot of things, Heinlein was bombastic and closed-minded. Whedon, we've learned in recent weeks, is just another creepy beta male feminist. But as we can see from this interview, Crichton was humble, open-minded, compassionate, but not afraid to be politically incorrect, if that's where the research took him. Out of all three, I admire Crichton the most.
Hard to believe both these men are the same age yet Crichton looks 20 years younger than Rose.
Crichton barely moves his facial muscles.
Rose likes Cocain.
RIP Crichton
Fascinating interview answers. Never saw a long form Crichton interview before. Glad Charlie Rose didn't sexually assault Michael on stage, also.
Troy Blackford what do you mean? Did he really sexually assault someone?
Michelle Muskeyn Haven't you seen the news? He's had his shows taken away and more and more people are accusing him of stuff going back decades and happening recently, too. Rose was a serial sexual predator who has lost his career and diagraced himself. Sucks, because a) it's awful for his victims, of course and b) he's done tons of long, interesting (but interrupt-y) interviews with authors I love like Crichton and Stephen King that are now hard to fully enjoy.
No I haven’t been watching a lot of TV lately. I’m on vacation. That’s terrible!!! Thanks for the info.
Charlie Rose sexually assaulting Crichton onstage would be disturbingly hilarious, tbh. Like a quick pat to the sac, and Michael's like "dude, wtf?".
@Charlie Sthill Sexual assault needn't be forcible rape, for one. Secondly, you could type that into Google instead of a comment section and got an answer. More stuff has come out about him since I wrote that comment.
10:58 title origin
Feels good knowing Michael Crichton would shit on these sjw types R.I.P Mr. Crichton
Charlie Rose always has to act like the smartest guy in the room...even when he absolutely isn't. Annoying.
In some ways the modern Jules Verne, tall man as well 6ft 9 inches.
Roland Tembo Foi Ele Fez Trabalho Serviso Sujo Pra Soltar Tiranossauro Rex Dois Adultos Foi Ele Pagou Assinatura Do Chegue No Filme O Mundo Perdido: Jurassic Park {1997}
Árvore Balaçando Muito Tiranossauro Ele Viu Carro Do Eddie Carr - Richard Schiff
Homem Estava Morrindo Anda Lado Da Morte
Legal a intervista, mas pena que o senhor M. Crichton morreu :/
I thought climate change killed several of my friends when they dropped off facebook. Turns out I was just an asshole and they unfriended me.
the lost world is a fantastic novel. Crichton's novel was half hearted. shame. guy was a fucking awesome author.
Charlie rose is so damn unpleasant. He’s too intense.
I feel if Crichton were alive today he’d be expressing his concerns about technology particularly the alt right
The lost world isnt a good story?! Crichton's a genius but fuck that Conan Doyles work is awesome
Blue Tank Engine Pictures Hes talking about the original Lost World....yeah Ive read it its good pulp
The lost world book was trash, It was so drug out and really was not his best work
What?, the novel and film are awesome
It's awe inspiring to see such an intelligent man subscribe to complete buffoonery. The poor fool is in hell now. May God allow some of us to escape the madness of the revolution.
Huh?
Kish Jugo You make no sense.
SonnyViceR and Johnnie I think what he is referring to is michael christons anti global warming postion. apparently, if you don't believe in it, you are going to hell.
lmaoooooooooooo
will i ever know what on earth this comment meant????? lmaaaaaaaao
First
Thank you Michael so much for the gift of Jurassic Park