Supersonic Planes are Coming Back (And This Time, They Might Work)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ค. 2024
  • Sign up for a CuriosityStream subscription and also get a free Nebula subscription (the streaming platform built by creators) here: CuriosityStream.com/wendover
    Watch the Nebula Plus companion video to this here: nebula.app/videos/wendover-pr...
    Listen to Extremities at ExtremitiesPodcast.com
    Buy a Wendover Productions t-shirt: standard.tv/collections/wendo...
    Subscribe to Half as Interesting (The other channel from Wendover Productions): / halfasinteresting
    TH-cam: / wendoverproductions
    Instagram: / sam.from.wendover
    Twitter: / wendoverpro
    Sponsorship Enquiries: wendover@standard.tv
    Other emails: sam@wendover.productions
    Reddit: / wendoverproductions
    Writing by Sam Denby
    Research by Sam Denby and Tristan Purdy
    Editing by Alexander Williard
    Animation by Josh Sherrington
    Sound by Graham Haerther
    Thumbnail by Simon Buckmaster
    Select footage courtesy the AP Archive
    References
    [1] core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11150...
    Musicbed SyncID:
    MB01GAPDXFMQD5N

ความคิดเห็น • 3.6K

  • @Imbalanxd
    @Imbalanxd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9532

    You know its a Wendover video when the sentence
    ends
    like this

    • @commie281
      @commie281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +251

      i kinda dislike pauses like that a lot of the time but when he does it it keeps a slightly better pace

    • @bobjoe1469
      @bobjoe1469 3 ปีที่แล้ว +483

      @@commie281 I disagree entirely. I find this video topic really interesting but I can't stand the vocal pace changing. I find it distracting and can't focus on what is being discussed. I've stopped watching this video because of this pulsing vocals and I've stopped watching other channels who does as well. I hate it!

    • @Ice_Karma
      @Ice_Karma 3 ปีที่แล้ว +261

      @@bobjoe1469 He didn't used to do this, and it's been getting worse and more annoying. Sam, you're getting worse than _William Shatner! _*_Cut it out!_*

    • @MagiSwag
      @MagiSwag 3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      Therefore...

    • @EE-sw3uh
      @EE-sw3uh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +153

      curse you for pointing this out, I can’t unhear it anymore

  • @cormacrohda319
    @cormacrohda319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3947

    It’s been 2 months since an airline video, I’m surprised he made it this long tbh

    • @6z0
      @6z0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +114

      he tried to quit cold turkey but he was on the verge of insanity and had to upload dis

    • @cormacrohda319
      @cormacrohda319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@6z0 It’s an addiction, Sam needs to go to rehab

    • @KiLLJoYYouTube
      @KiLLJoYYouTube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He likes them a lot lol

    • @cormacrohda319
      @cormacrohda319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@KiLLJoYTH-cam that’s an understatement, he is ADDICTED

    • @wh2960
      @wh2960 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Planes should be counted as one of the most dangerous drugs. Globally

  • @SMlFFY85
    @SMlFFY85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +390

    In the last 6 months of Concorde people knew it was the last 6 months of Concorde, there wasn't ever going to be a problem filling those seats because people just wanted to be able to say they had flown Concorde. It was effectively an amusment park ride at that point.

    • @Arbenowskee
      @Arbenowskee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Exactly. I know a couple of people who booked flights solely because it was going to be retired. They just stayed in the airport and waited for the flight home =)

    • @tiongxuchuah7497
      @tiongxuchuah7497 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree

    • @fi7959
      @fi7959 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      An amusement park ride that could still get you from NY to London in a few hours.

  • @Datch18
    @Datch18 3 ปีที่แล้ว +834

    One thing to consider is that the reason why they turned a profit after it was announced they were retiring was because people wanted to try to fly on the concord before it was retired

    • @johnmurphy5689
      @johnmurphy5689 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      But the real reason was thanks to the ticket prices reduced to Business Class levels, which lead to a greater load factor per flight which lead into more profit, a 35% Filled Concorde with First Class Prices was able to break even.

    • @johnbergstrom2931
      @johnbergstrom2931 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      If British Airways and Air France had to actually purchase the Concordes and pay back development costs (equivalent to over $20 billion in today's money) you'd get a true gauge of what a financial disaster the plane actually was.

    • @malcolm_in_the_middle
      @malcolm_in_the_middle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      "A" reason, not "the" reason.

  • @zenokada2278
    @zenokada2278 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5202

    The only reason Concorde failed is they didn’t use skillshare

    • @olegnaumov225
      @olegnaumov225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      lmao

    • @AxxLAfriku
      @AxxLAfriku 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      OH NOOOOOO!!! Most people agree that my vids are the worst on TH-cam. I agree to disagree. Please agree to disagree with the haters, dear zen

    • @piranha031091
      @piranha031091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Rookie mistake!

    • @resultsforlife3333
      @resultsforlife3333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Um.....cuz they're all boomers?

    • @TheBrendanWoolbert
      @TheBrendanWoolbert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      They didn’t have honey installed on their flight computers either so they didn’t get the discounts on jet fuel. Led to its downfall

  • @abdinasiromar4423
    @abdinasiromar4423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8411

    This guy never gets tired of planes. True legend.

    • @DyslexicMitochondria
      @DyslexicMitochondria 3 ปีที่แล้ว +252

      Just like my ex never got tired of screwing other guys

    • @PianoBoyLiam
      @PianoBoyLiam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      @@DyslexicMitochondria You wanna talk?

    • @seaweeded
      @seaweeded 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      When he does, he talks about bricks.

    • @charlesnicholson7539
      @charlesnicholson7539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@DyslexicMitochondria Weed eater.

    • @amritsingh4251
      @amritsingh4251 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@DyslexicMitochondria I swear ever since I subscribed to you I see you everywhere

  • @VanGoWanderlust
    @VanGoWanderlust 3 ปีที่แล้ว +783

    I’m glad you talked about passenger productivity. Amtrak in the US did a similar study. They were focused on speed and reducing commute time between DC and NYC. What they discovered was that most people didn’t care about shaving time off the trip, they cared more about being able to use their time on the train. So Amtrak solved their problem by just including outlets to recharge laptops and free Wi-Fi.

    • @cuddlemuffin.9545
      @cuddlemuffin.9545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      And sucking up more tax payers money

    • @TessHKM
      @TessHKM 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      @@cuddlemuffin.9545 Good!

    • @persona3448
      @persona3448 2 ปีที่แล้ว +139

      @@cuddlemuffin.9545 Unlike roads and highways which take up no taxpayer money as opposed to those stupid trains

    • @cuddlemuffin.9545
      @cuddlemuffin.9545 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@persona3448 alright buddy, go build tails in the mid west that can support 70 million people and carry them everywhere..

    • @ereder1476
      @ereder1476 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@cuddlemuffin.9545 to do that you will need to 1st abolish corruption and putting finger out of their but so that the state can finally own thoses strategic infrastructure called railroads...

  • @kitnaylor7267
    @kitnaylor7267 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1675

    Two weeks later: Aerion Supersonic goes bust.
    This aged well.

    • @stefanewers1471
      @stefanewers1471 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Bro see my comment from two weeks ago🤣

    • @PatNebula
      @PatNebula 3 ปีที่แล้ว +165

      Not very surprising, the entire aviation industry is screwed. Look how many would-be pilots have to give up their dream of ever flying an airliner because their training doesn't go ahead. Challenging times.

    • @AZ-rg3rf
      @AZ-rg3rf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +147

      Aerion went Boom

    • @walterbrunswick
      @walterbrunswick 3 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      Would be better if these engineers developed something more useful and practical, not supersonic planes for the rich
      No tears for them

    • @steampunknord
      @steampunknord 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@PatNebula Yeah, I think that the main reason that the big companies aren't going bust are the massive contracts in areas of aviation that aren't being as negatively interrupted. Like military contracts and cargo.

  • @annagilda1
    @annagilda1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2181

    Concorde used to fly over my house when I was a kid. We lived right at the coast of the Bristol Channel, which was the point at which Concorde was allowed to go supersonic. Sometimes they'd go supersonic a bit early. The boom was real. I used to love hearing it because I was amazed by Concorde, but it was loud and sometimes the windows used to shake.

    • @tomx641
      @tomx641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      Wait for the the protests over a 4th runway at Heathrow especially for supersonic planes!

    • @Wombat1916
      @Wombat1916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Before Concorde came into service, tests were carried out allowing RAF jets to fly supersonic over London and waiting for the complaints! I remember it well!

    • @scammelljones6545
      @scammelljones6545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      I live in the Bristol Channel and at night you ‘ hear the distinctive sound of Concorde look up with binoculars and see them light up the after burners ! Sad that’s now only a memory

    • @allthingstoallmen8912
      @allthingstoallmen8912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@scammelljones6545 it was a beautiful sight I'm sure!

    • @YouAreBreathing
      @YouAreBreathing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I had a friend who lived below a flight route near our local airport, and I used to housesit for him. I don't know how he lived with the sounds of planes coming in for a landing throughout the day, and I can't imagine having a sonic boom occur where you lived.

  • @MichaelVanBladel
    @MichaelVanBladel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +616

    As a pilot who grew up with a concorde poster above his bed, i can't wait for the chance to fly one of these one day!

    • @William-Morey-Baker
      @William-Morey-Baker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Hopefully not over land .. regular old jets are already too damn loud... Honestly humans are too too damn loud in general. There are few places on earth where you can't hear their bullshit

    • @bigsherk42069
      @bigsherk42069 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@William-Morey-Baker there are scientists working on a plane shape that silences sonic booms. Pretty neat.

    • @andyc9902
      @andyc9902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@bigsherk42069 As Electric planes will come. My bet in on Electrical plane

    • @Mike__B
      @Mike__B 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@William-Morey-Baker Jets are loud when taking off/landing. Are they really that loud when they're traveling 30-40k feet?

    • @MichaelVanBladel
      @MichaelVanBladel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@Mike__B no, you can't hear a plane when it's at cruising levels

  • @codygabe67
    @codygabe67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +461

    And just like that Aerion is shut down two weeks after you talk about them.

    • @AZ-rg3rf
      @AZ-rg3rf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      jinxed them bad

    • @G-546
      @G-546 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Well on the bright side United ordered 15 supersonic jets from Boom

    • @nimueh4298
      @nimueh4298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The rest will follow, is just a matter of time. Until than it make interesting news.

    • @nimueh4298
      @nimueh4298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      G 546
      Yeah, a plane that doesn't even exist yet.

    • @G-546
      @G-546 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@nimueh4298 the fact that it doesn’t exist yet doesn’t matter. The 707, 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-11, MD-80, MD-90, A300, A310, A320, A330, A340, A350, A380, L1011, CS100, and CS300 all had orders before they were made. Those plane types are currently widely used across airlines or used to be widely used.

  • @EyreAffair
    @EyreAffair 3 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    Today - June 3, 2021 - United Airlines announced that they ordered 15 new supersonic jets to be built by American start-up Boom Supersonic, to be completed by the year 2029, pending U.S. government approval. The model is the "Overture", and is expected to be the Concorde's direct successor. Testing will begin in 2025-2026.

    • @ruzziasht349
      @ruzziasht349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It looks indentical to Concord - first seen in 1969

    • @ahuman7523
      @ahuman7523 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yay

    • @ereder1476
      @ereder1476 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "to be build" .... "pending approval"
      thoses are just stock market stunt anouncement

    • @johnbergstrom2931
      @johnbergstrom2931 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Sounds to me like the CEO of United Airlines is getting a nice, fat kickback from Boom... They'll write it off as a 'consulting fee'...

    • @JoeOvercoat
      @JoeOvercoat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And 1% of the the 1% cheered. For the rest of us, we’re just going to suck up the exhaust and the noise.

  • @RafandresProductions
    @RafandresProductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2072

    Of all the names they could’ve gone with, they went with “Boom.” That’s like if I named a construction company “Collapse.”

    • @mikek6298
      @mikek6298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +304

      It's more like naming a bridge company "strut". Like, it's an integral part of the product, but not the one I'd focus on in the name

    • @bandvitromania9642
      @bandvitromania9642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      @Bogdan Kondratov and Headshot

    • @timj.
      @timj. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@bandvitromania9642 made possible by Lincoln motors

    • @bandvitromania9642
      @bandvitromania9642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@timj. thats a dope name already

    • @xXrandomryzeXx
      @xXrandomryzeXx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      I think its more like sonic boom an not a crash boom lol

  • @daftrok
    @daftrok 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1371

    Marketing Team: Okay so we finally got a great name for our supersonic flight compan--
    CEO: BOOM!
    Marketing Team: Uh...what are you--?
    CEO: ...BOOM.

    • @awijaya2116
      @awijaya2116 3 ปีที่แล้ว +167

      On the bright side, this makes it possible for them to make an Extended Range variant, and call it a BOOM-ER.

    • @jeffreyau9751
      @jeffreyau9751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@awijaya2116 The even faster version of that, presumably made even further in the future, can be named the ZOOM-ER

    • @sthadewald
      @sthadewald 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@jeffreyau9751 If unsafe, its DOOM

    • @xYOSIYAx
      @xYOSIYAx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Funny that they do the most work to reduce the sonic boom

    • @MartijnMuller
      @MartijnMuller 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I want Ryan George to do this pitch meeting

  • @seldoon_nemar
    @seldoon_nemar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    9:40 for anyone who wants examples of this, there are occasions where fighters are cleared for supersonic travel over the continental united states for emergency response and they leave a string of videos of people hearing *BANG* and flinching, dogs bark, kids cry, mass confusion to be had; all because a Cessna was flying in a restricted airspace around the president

    • @benharris7358
      @benharris7358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Its only because people are not accustomed to the sound. I'll bet it was similar the first time people had commercial planes fly over their houses back in the early days of plane travel

    • @skislope4218
      @skislope4218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@benharris7358 BANG

    • @azrielsatan8693
      @azrielsatan8693 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@benharris7358 I don't think you understand how loud a sonic boom is.

    • @benharris7358
      @benharris7358 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@azrielsatan8693, it depends entirely on how close to the speed of sound the plane is travelling. If it is travelling Mach 2 then the shockwave is more spread out.

    • @koenven7012
      @koenven7012 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@benharris7358 and probably also on how high it's flying. If flying higher, the sonic boom gets spread out and absorbed by the air

  • @ethohalfslab
    @ethohalfslab 3 ปีที่แล้ว +912

    Welp, United just bought 15 of these that are coming in 2029! You predicted it!

    • @abrahamlincoln4399
      @abrahamlincoln4399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      50 actually

    • @ruzziasht349
      @ruzziasht349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Could have had it in 1969 had the US not banned it.

    • @abrahamlincoln4399
      @abrahamlincoln4399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@ruzziasht349 well, I'm not sure but I'm pretty sure you mean 1976.

    • @ruzziasht349
      @ruzziasht349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@abrahamlincoln4399 - 2nd March 1969 was the first flight of Concord.

    • @abrahamlincoln4399
      @abrahamlincoln4399 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@ruzziasht349 okay, thanks. But wasn't it launched for the public in 1976?

  • @ihavetowait90daystochangem67
    @ihavetowait90daystochangem67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +752

    We all know that the Magic Schoolbus is a more efficient Transportation System than any super sonic plane

    • @badhrihari1705
      @badhrihari1705 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Smartz

    • @stegx2853
      @stegx2853 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yup

    • @Erin-Thor
      @Erin-Thor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      LOL! On a serious note, trains have the lowest cost per mile per passenger of any mode of transportation. And the USA has how many high speed trains? Wait for it. Zero.

    • @USSAnimeNCC-
      @USSAnimeNCC- 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nothing beat plot time I'm looking at you star wars XD

    • @internetperson9813
      @internetperson9813 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Erin-Thor True, the problem is that the US will never build high speed rail because building it across such a large country has never been done except by China

  • @steveschutte4990
    @steveschutte4990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +292

    I grew up as a TWA brat and got to fly on the Concorde once, in 1983, from London to New York. The passenger experience on the plane was actually very similar to subsonic transatlantic first class. The coolest part of the flight was watching the cabin speedometer approach and then surpass Mach 1. Though landing in New York "earlier" than you left London was a little weird.

    • @doncarlin9081
      @doncarlin9081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Pretty much my experience on the Concorde.
      And I was a TWA brat too, in Saudi Arabia.

    • @volbla
      @volbla 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Oh really? It outflew the earth's rotation? That's kind of badass.

    • @doncarlin9081
      @doncarlin9081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      @@volbla it sure did. The earth rotates around 1000mph while the Concorde flew at around 1350mph. I left London 10:30 am and arrived at JFK at 9:00am the same day. 😁

    • @ruzziasht349
      @ruzziasht349 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@volbla you do know the time in New York is not the same time as is in London

    • @volbla
      @volbla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@ruzziasht349 Yes. This wasn't about that.

  • @Marmocet
    @Marmocet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    My sister's boss used to fly Concorde from London to New York all the time. He loved that he could fly from London, land in New York, do what he needed to do there, then fly back to London the same day. I suppose he also had the benefit of flying before security measures tagged a few extra hours onto door-to-door airline travel.

  • @matthewbaynham6286
    @matthewbaynham6286 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Concord operated for about 4 decades. That's longer than most commercial aircraft.
    The video repeated refers Concord failing, it didn't fail, it operated well beyond it's expected life time and retired of old age.
    Concord most definitely was an absolute success.

  • @cats400
    @cats400 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I actually heard the Sonic "thump" from one of NASA's tests. I go to college on Galveston Island, just south of Houston. This was like 2 years ago. NASA was testing this new technology just offshore and was asking random citizens on the island what their thoughts was on the noise. I remember walking downtown when I heard this brief "thump" it wasn't loud, but it was definitely noticeable. It made me look up at the sky briefly before I realized what I just heard.

    • @kaitlyn__L
      @kaitlyn__L 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      That’s pretty interesting. A car door slamming has bugged me before, but it would probably be bearable. A sonic boom however… I thought I was experiencing an earthquake for about 20 seconds the one time in my life I heard one.
      “Probably.” It _was_ just fine, if it really is like a car door slamming on the street outside. I lived in a building where I was right next to the car park and ppl leaving taxis and stuff. It was usually fine, though I definitely heard the doors. But “bearable” is putting up with jets and helicopters interrupting conversations and TV for a minute or so in the daytime. A car door slamming is way more minor than that.

    • @aljones6012
      @aljones6012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That will have been with the modified F-18 that NASA used for early testing of some of the features that are going into the X-59.

    • @user-do5zk6jh1k
      @user-do5zk6jh1k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kaitlyn__L I still remember hearing the space shuttle's approach for the first time. Scared the shit out of us and the internet wasn't as developed as it was today. We didn't know what it was until the news that night.

    • @googlesucks3163
      @googlesucks3163 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kaitlyn__L 20 seconds? Lol ummmm ok probably was an earthquake. I’ve never heard one last longer than seconds…..and I heard plenty in the military.

  • @keiming2277
    @keiming2277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +334

    Soviet TU-144 be like : I offer caviar on the plane and paper and pens so you can communicate with you friends on board because it’s too damn loud

    • @georgearrivals
      @georgearrivals 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      “Hey I exist! Shit, dropped an engine, hold on...”

    • @themasher1187
      @themasher1187 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      He actually shows it at 10:43

    • @PiDsPagePrototypes
      @PiDsPagePrototypes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And that's not even close to the Ruskie's loudest aircraft, the Tu-95 and Tu-114.
      Wonder how the noise of the 114 compared to the Concorde's booms?

    • @Kaidhicksii
      @Kaidhicksii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep. :P

    • @wyqtor
      @wyqtor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Our comrade citizens also don't give a damn about that noise when our top plane is flying supersonic OVER LAND from Moscow to Almaty! Take that, capitalists!

  • @TangoAnton
    @TangoAnton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    Aerion is shutting down today. I think it's highly unlikely that any of these companies will succeed. Business travel will never fully recover after COVID and it will be hard to secure financing.

    • @freiherrvonbraun6942
      @freiherrvonbraun6942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Atleast they are trying

    • @chrisjoondeph4781
      @chrisjoondeph4781 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      United just made an offer to buy Supersonic planes today

    • @badgerattoadhall
      @badgerattoadhall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I agree with you business travel will never recover.... the videoconference was very successful over the epidemic.

    • @nimueh4298
      @nimueh4298 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chris Joondeph
      A working model doesn't even exist, as of now it makes interesting news. In the long run I doubt it will happen.

    • @rayden54
      @rayden54 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Regarding financing: I wonder how badly the military wants this thing. If they can quiet the supersonic boom, the military can make much stealthier aircraft. If they can't, civilian use of supersonic aircraft over land means that even if people do hear it, they won't point to the military.

  • @DavidFrankal
    @DavidFrankal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    You should do "Economics of Night Trains" - noting the creation of NightJet in 2016 and the recent rise in political/environmental interest in overnight rail services across Europe

  • @aeches
    @aeches 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    the first ever supersonic plane (bell x-1, the one that's in D.C. aerospace museum if you look up when you enter, it's bright orange.) was built by a team which included my great-grandfather.

    • @ioele1000
      @ioele1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's cool as hell.

    • @ChefofWar33
      @ChefofWar33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I bet he has some cool stories.

    • @michaelbishop3439
      @michaelbishop3439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What was your great grandfather's name I gotta know lol?

    • @computerbob06
      @computerbob06 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They also 'stole' a lot of British technology when they designed it!

    • @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721
      @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Your great-grandfather seems pretty fly.

  • @josephcohen734
    @josephcohen734 3 ปีที่แล้ว +341

    "Nearly everyone has heard some version of why concord failed"
    This is what we call the curse of knowledge effect

    • @aleksey4e
      @aleksey4e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I'm from Russia and I would be surprised even if 10% of my familiars were ever wondered why Concorde failed
      Or at least in what decade it did happen

    • @skirata3144
      @skirata3144 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well it’s still correct when you consider the development cost of the Concorde BA was able to turn them into a profit because they only paid one pound per aircraft.

  • @Random_Number
    @Random_Number 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Honolulu seems like a perfect hub for these. Lots of flights from the continental US, Japan, Australia, etc., come though HNL, and they're all mainly over water.

    • @jamesdinius7769
      @jamesdinius7769 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Not really. Honolulu is a tourist hub, not a business hub. Passengers are too price sensitive and there likely isn't enough business travel to sustain a supersonic plane. They will just fly cheaper subsonic flights. Routes like LA to Tokyo are where the money is.

    • @theredison6324
      @theredison6324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jamesdinius7769 fax

    • @MariktheWolf
      @MariktheWolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they should just drop these noise restrictions...all ppl do is complain about something that by its nature is loud...sst would be much more beneficial...

    • @MariktheWolf
      @MariktheWolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Buffalo_Soldier so not only do you not want supersonic flight...you want to ruin the way cars sound...it doesnt hurt anyone...ppl have been living with it for so long now...driving a quiet sports car is boring...the soul is gone...half the reason i dont like EVs is that they are too quiet...i lived near an air base with b52s and b1s taking off...they are not quiet by any means...several times a day youd hear a b1 take off full afterburner...no one died or went crazy or had hearing loss...it doesnt hurt anyone...you want to make the world a boring place where driving a fast loud car doesnt get your blood flowing...and never moves past subsonic flight...time efficiency and fun is more important than a quiet city...the speed limits on the interstates should be raised to 85 across the US to make better time...and its safer...you have boring written all over you by that comment alone...

    • @edgardox.feliciano3127
      @edgardox.feliciano3127 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MariktheWolf Wait, speed limits on interstates DON'T reach 90 mph? What's the speed limit?

  • @lilfattcatt7758
    @lilfattcatt7758 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If I ever hear a 110 decibel noise over my house I’m buying a stinger missile system

  • @forestreee
    @forestreee 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1760

    I love how prestige is one of the reasons for choosing a less comfortable, more expensive mode of transport.
    "sir, why do you want to spend $120 million on a small, uncomfortable plane?"
    "Because I don't wanna be seen as a poor peasant by flying first class."

    • @bobfg3130
      @bobfg3130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      That's one of the reasons some will never buy a small plane.

    • @qovro
      @qovro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +144

      I'm pretty sure the kind of small planes talked about here are very luxurious. Aside from that, rich people like private planes because of privacy and convenience. No need to plan your travel around an airline schedule or walk through a busy airport terminal. You choose the takeoff time you want and the plane and pilots will be standing by waiting for you to drive up and go.

    • @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721
      @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Maybe we commoners just don't understand it.

    • @bobfg3130
      @bobfg3130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721
      Good joke.

    • @jeffreyhill1011
      @jeffreyhill1011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@qovro if they are like some private jets currently they will be extremely comfortable. Due to my friends circle I have flown private a few times and it really is a leap above 1st class. Even at very high speed in a G6 you hear very little noise

  • @thousandlemons8766
    @thousandlemons8766 3 ปีที่แล้ว +457

    "You don't want to use the word "Boom" with a supersonic airplane." - Peggy Olson, probably.

    • @admirali.a.6175
      @admirali.a.6175 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      You don’t want to use “boom” with ANYTHING.

    • @ArcticPrimal
      @ArcticPrimal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      but supersonic airplanes are de facto associated with "sonic boom"

    • @fermitupoupon1754
      @fermitupoupon1754 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@admirali.a.6175 in Dutch the word 'boom' means tree. The double o is pronounced like a long o as in over.

    • @timnelson8656
      @timnelson8656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can't say boom on a plane

    • @sirapple589
      @sirapple589 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fermitu Poupon
      Like Boh-m?

  • @mwd331
    @mwd331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I would argue that it “worked” last time with Concorde. Admittedly on nowhere near the number of destinations the designers or airlines wanted, but was hugely successful at its peak on transatlantic routes and flew for 30 years before its sad retirement.

    • @jujenho
      @jujenho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      By successful I believe you mean "admired".

    • @mwd331
      @mwd331 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jujenho with the concorde fleet making 25% of BA's revenue at one point, yes pretty successful.

    • @jujenho
      @jujenho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mwd331 You mean revenue (the money cashed from the consumers), not profit. The plane's operation was HEAVILY subsided. If your figure is right, BA surely was broke by then, because the number of Concorde flights was a tiny fraction of the whole airline operation.

    • @mwd331
      @mwd331 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jujenho ok, that’s all reasonable and true. I just really like what it technically represented and achieved. (also I do understand what revenue is).

    • @jujenho
      @jujenho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mwd331 I am no less an enthusiast of Concorde as a technology than you. I just regret that the market was not ready for it. As a matter of fact I just don't know when it will. Its performance demands VERY expensive systems. Maybe an executive jet for very wealthy people, as some are being designed today.

  • @connellkennedy1885
    @connellkennedy1885 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Its one thing to lower the noise of the sonic boom, its another thing to change the environmental issues that the boom itself creates. If aerion, boom, and spike can tackle that issue, and come up with a way to change the boom noise limits, then there is no doubt that these companies are going to be highly profitable.
    Edit:
    Welp, helps to read the rest of the comments…

    • @TSERJI
      @TSERJI 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      flying suborbital would solve that issue, wouldn't it? There wouldn't be any air for the sound to travel through

  • @tiadaid
    @tiadaid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +225

    I remember the hype over Concorde's last flight in 2003. I still can't believe it has been almost 20 years...

    • @KaiserMattTygore927
      @KaiserMattTygore927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know, I was 10 when they stopped flying those. -_-

    • @ChrispyNut
      @ChrispyNut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That accounts for a lot of why he's seeing such occupancy rates, later in concorde's service. It became an experience that was achievable for a bunch who just wanted to ride it for the sake of it, including it in a once in a lifetime holiday (with such relative price). Those levels weren't sustainable without further price cuts, though I suspect could still have been done profitably under appropriate stewardship.

    • @kms50549
      @kms50549 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My school was like 2 miles from one of the main factories/airfields. We had to stand out on a field to spell out “welcome home” during its last flight to said airfield. Interestingly both the school and the airfield are referred to as in Filton, yet neither of them is actually in Filton. Which itself is actually split in two and ran by two different councils so in no way actually represents an actually city district in any meaningful way.

    • @bradobbink6564
      @bradobbink6564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wonder how much faster Elons rockets would be after they make it passenger friendly.

    • @tamiwu0346
      @tamiwu0346 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was born exactly 5 days after Concordes last flight. Kinda cool.

  • @athirkell
    @athirkell 3 ปีที่แล้ว +247

    As a boy I flew London - Cairo on Concorde back in 1997, as a gift from a wealthy grandmother. Every passenger got a goody bag with a model of the aircraft, a bottle of champagne and a tin of caviar. Weird and wonderful experience!

    • @flubadubdubthegreat1272
      @flubadubdubthegreat1272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      How kind of her. I hope you enjoyed it

    • @kaitlyn__L
      @kaitlyn__L 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I’m glad they did have at least one other route, I was thinking Cairo should be disabled when looking at that map.

    • @electropupil
      @electropupil 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Should've been a charter flight, I guess

    • @athirkell
      @athirkell 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@kaitlyn__L I think we went round Spain and across the Mediterranean. I remember it didn't take very long whatever the route was!
      The map makes it seem like it couldn't fly over land, when in fact it just couldn't fly supersonic over land. There were lots of routes!

    • @jeremygalloway1348
      @jeremygalloway1348 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Did your granny want the champagne? Did you try the caviar? What did you do with the model?

  • @richardpierpoint3006
    @richardpierpoint3006 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Also, there was a Russian Concorde, the Tupolev Tu-144, which crashed a few times, but nobody seems to remember because it was a Soviet aircraft.

    • @jms6945
      @jms6945 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I heard that they managed to get their hands on the concorde plans and that's how they were able to build it. But they didn't manage to get the plans for what kept it's fuel efficiency, so the Russian one used a lot more fuel and was therefore a lot more expensive to fly.

    • @rogerstone3068
      @rogerstone3068 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@jms6945 It had to use the afterburners in order to maintain supersonic flight, whilst Concorde could shat them down once cruising height and speed were attained.

    • @jms6945
      @jms6945 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rogerstone3068 oh OK. Thank you

    • @katashworth41
      @katashworth41 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was so loud it was impractical.

  • @FastCarsNoRules220
    @FastCarsNoRules220 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Honestly the only reason why I want supersonic travel to return and be made more affordable is because I don't want to sit 12+ hours in economy class on a normal plane just to visit Asia.

  • @andie_pants
    @andie_pants 3 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    I like to think that some engineer saw the XB-70 Valkyrie and said _"Let's put passengers on it!"_

  • @khulhucthulhu9952
    @khulhucthulhu9952 3 ปีที่แล้ว +330

    The thing with "productive time lost in the air" is that if you change a 10 hour flight into a 3 hour flight, you can be fully useful for 7 hours more and simply rest for 3 hours, rather than be partially productive for 10 hours...

    • @spdewertton
      @spdewertton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      Yeah working on planes suck, but the fact that it wasn't even possible back in the concord days made short fight times more valuable. Today the productivity gap between subsonic and sonic flights is smaller due to the amount of work and sleep you can get done on a plane. Smaller, but not gone.

    • @Arcaryon
      @Arcaryon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@spdewertton Depends on the price of the flight, doesn’t it? If I fly economy/ business sure but in luxury classes, productivity is not an issue.
      So it COULD be eliminated today - it’s just not cost effective.

    • @spdewertton
      @spdewertton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Arcaryon Indeed. I hadn't thought of that. I'm really not sure if supersonic flight is worth the hassle outside of private jets.

    • @A.Martin
      @A.Martin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Also now with internet you may not even need to fly at all.

    • @Arcaryon
      @Arcaryon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@spdewertton Of course it will be eventually in my opinion but I doubt that it will happen in the next 10 years. Innovation is costly and often not very profitable in the short term.
      It has been decades since the invention of trains and yet, despite excellent success in a lot of areas of the field and working examples of high speed systems that provide great services, in most developed nations, riding on a railroad is merely a way to get from A to B in a somewhat crowded area at moderate speeds where working efficiently is not really possible.
      While we seem to improve exponentially, reforms of existent technology also get more and more expensive.
      Crypto currencies and similar methods of transaction for instance already require gigantic amounts of electricity in relatively early states of their popular acceptance and usage.

  • @43Jodo
    @43Jodo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +226

    "Aerion is not in the business of selling pipe dreams"
    They're not in the business of selling anything. Whole company's shutting down. Pop goes the bullshit

    • @soravulpis96
      @soravulpis96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @bcvbb hyui It was an American company

    • @neo214
      @neo214 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@soravulpis96 All companies are.

    • @TheSeppentoni
      @TheSeppentoni 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does it make a sonic boom when the BS pops?

    • @toasterhavingabath6980
      @toasterhavingabath6980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@neo214 i mean not the non American ones

    • @madoxxxx06
      @madoxxxx06 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Boom got a contract, so there is still some hope.

  • @billhart9832
    @billhart9832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've followed all of the companies here as well as the Concord and unmentioned TU-144 for the majority of my 62 years. This is the best coverage of the players, their strategies, technologies, and likelihood for success. Very well put together.

  • @AverytheCubanAmerican
    @AverytheCubanAmerican 3 ปีที่แล้ว +198

    "ran over a piece of engine cowling that a previous departure had lost"
    This. People forget that it was debris from ANOTHER flight that caused the tragic crash, the crash didn't happen on its own. The attractiveness of supersonic travel declined because people remember this crash, on top of the noise, and think all supersonic jets are dangerous

    • @jaffacalling53
      @jaffacalling53 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      The DC-10 was such a piece of shit that it wasn't even satisfied with only killing its own passengers.

    • @xponen
      @xponen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I think the Concorde violated some safety margin, like having a tire that explode and having hull closer to the ground. The debris is like a tiny domino pieces that trigger the whole system to collapse.

    • @davekp6773
      @davekp6773 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jaffacalling53 Early ones certainly but I often flew on British Caledonian DC-10-30s and I absolutely loved the flights on them.

    • @andredeketeleastutecomplex
      @andredeketeleastutecomplex 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All supersonic jets are dangerous!

    • @fauzirahman3285
      @fauzirahman3285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      To be fair it was getting quite old and was probably overdue for another generation when they decided to stop flying them.

  • @fredmdea785
    @fredmdea785 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Everyone: worrying abt efficiency and how to make aviation more echo friendly
    These guys: GOTTA GO FAST

    • @lookingforsomething
      @lookingforsomething 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      "echo-friendly" indeed. I do worry though. We don't need airplanes that pollute more, but ones that pollute less.

    • @ChefofWar33
      @ChefofWar33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@lookingforsomething They just need to use hydrogen oxygen rockets that go sub orbital and can go from LA to Sidney in 1.5 hours. Literally just creates water as waste.

    • @canadave87
      @canadave87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah, I can't help but think that's going to be the biggest hurdle for these companies. By the 2030s, a plane that pollutes even more than most is going to be an even harder sell.

  • @newporg6887
    @newporg6887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    ...i rememeber hearing Concorde growing up back in Nova scotia. It would move the storm windows in the farm house i grew up in... it was SO loud.

  • @nikkiturner8431
    @nikkiturner8431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another amazing video. Signed up to annual nebula/curiosity stream bundle yesterday, spent most of yesterday and half last night just lying watching nebula! Fab service, some awesome documentaries. Can't wait to get stuck back in later

  • @francescosirotti8178
    @francescosirotti8178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +292

    "This time is different!"... Yeah, the most expensive sentence ever is here again, I see

    • @E1craZ4life
      @E1craZ4life 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      “Did I ever tell you what the definition of insanity is? Insanity is doing the exact same f***ing thing over and over again expecting s*** to change. That is crazy.”

    • @robertthomas5196
      @robertthomas5196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      "Just another $20,000,000. I swear!"

    • @johnsmith132.
      @johnsmith132. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who's AWAKE in 2021?

    • @SeeSawMacaw
      @SeeSawMacaw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. I also like “this time is different again” 😂

  • @dickydoodle8454
    @dickydoodle8454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    As a child we enjoyed the suprise of frequent sonic booms ..living close to the air force academy

    • @user-do5zk6jh1k
      @user-do5zk6jh1k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I wish I was there when supersonic flyovers were allowed.

    • @cybergeek5476
      @cybergeek5476 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      How is your hearing?

    • @dickydoodle8454
      @dickydoodle8454 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@cybergeek5476 huh?

    • @user-do5zk6jh1k
      @user-do5zk6jh1k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@dickydoodle8454 He thinks distant sonic booms will hurt your hearing

    • @tylerdurden3722
      @tylerdurden3722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I remember the boom not being that bad.
      I think is was probably only bad for those living in the vicinity of where these planes started descending lower, or were still ascending.

  • @SuperAntichicken
    @SuperAntichicken 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You have no idea how badly I want a supersonic flight experience

  • @TheAntichrist84
    @TheAntichrist84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Well, Aerion just shut down, so now there's just two.

  • @Karnegis
    @Karnegis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I saw the Concord takeoff at Heathrow in the early 90’s. It was significantly louder than the 747s on takeoff. I grew up near Beal AFB and every once in a while we would get a sonic boom from a SR-71 shake our house.

    • @thequietstag4366
      @thequietstag4366 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, sorta makes me not hate the Concorde idea, but also not like it.

    • @FreewayBrent
      @FreewayBrent 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm currently up the hill a bit in nearby Penn Valley, and even out here (away from the flight path of Beale), I can still hear the jets come in for takeoff and landing.

  • @MrUPSman
    @MrUPSman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    International air travel: stops
    Wendover: and I took that personally

  • @sooperdooper5967
    @sooperdooper5967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love this channel, even though I don’t know much about planes nor do I really care to. It’s just really interesting to listen to and relax for a couple of minutes :)

  • @javianjohnson8746
    @javianjohnson8746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    I was only 3 years old when Concorde went out of business for good. When I first saw what one looked like when I was 8, I've since been fascinated by its unique shape and ability to fly at 60 thousand feet. Since I've never even had the chance to experience Concorde, I would LOVE if one of these companies helps it have a second life, because we seriously need another one back in the skies

    • @normanpickering7282
      @normanpickering7282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was fortunate enough to experience a flight on Concord. True enough it was only from London to Amsterdam and not supersonic but as the pilot said on takeoff “I’ll give it full wellie” WoW what an experience..

    • @javianjohnson8746
      @javianjohnson8746 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Norman Pickering that honestly sounds amazing. Just to experience one in action, no matter what route, is historic now

    • @juicy342yt4
      @juicy342yt4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You must've enjoyed hearing how united ordered 15 planes from boom so theres a decent chance of them succeeding I'd think

    • @fortcrafterbossbehold9027
      @fortcrafterbossbehold9027 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol I was a newborn when it went out...

    • @AinKrab
      @AinKrab ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fortcrafterbossbehold9027 Imagine being born before it retired

  • @spikegorman1650
    @spikegorman1650 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Sam returning to his roots in airplanes. We missed it. Thank you. Your plane videos are always my favorite.

  • @heavyizthacrown-5842
    @heavyizthacrown-5842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’m going to try that Nebula & Curiosity Stream bundle one of these days. It actually looks great!

  • @vsm6847
    @vsm6847 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    It’s so hard to pay attention after noticing that
    Every.
    Sentence.
    Ends.
    Like.
    This.
    It’s a neuroatypical thing. Can’t actually hear the words anymore because I’m anticipating the pattern.

    • @joshuahawkes7218
      @joshuahawkes7218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you don't like it, don't watch it.

    • @iddra1868
      @iddra1868 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same. It's extremely annoying.

  • @Denotsmai87
    @Denotsmai87 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    My cousin's father in law was a Concorde pilot, we call him Mr. Super Sonic, he's a true English gentleman and has some truly amazing stories. As a flyer myself, I was utterly in awe; maybe even a bit star struck!

  • @Lcngopher
    @Lcngopher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Fun fact: flights from detroit to chicago are so short and change time zones, you arrive before you left

    • @JankerMLD
      @JankerMLD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Back to the future

  • @christophercoleman6596
    @christophercoleman6596 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This time, they'll be so fast they'll arrive before they started.

  • @oliverfreyre4658
    @oliverfreyre4658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    We would love a wendover productions video on the process of making a wendover video. How you do your research, organize animations, etc.

  • @feiwu14
    @feiwu14 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    6:01 The Concorde wasn’t the first supersonic passenger plane; The TU-144 was.

  • @agentzorral3939
    @agentzorral3939 3 ปีที่แล้ว +189

    Super sonic is like that thing we didn’t think we need.

    • @tpespos
      @tpespos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      I mean I don’t see myself ever needing to do this outside of pure 1 time experience.

    • @sillybilly4710
      @sillybilly4710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      @Umbrella With no videos or content?!?! As someone who rarely flies, I guess? It’s so rare for me that I actually enjoy flying. But I’d much rather high speed train across the country.

    • @pyroman2918
      @pyroman2918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @Umbrella With no videos or content?!?! Not if it burns that much more fuel. If we develop hydrogen supersonic plane then maybe.

    • @ronylouis0
      @ronylouis0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pyroman2918 hydrogen isn't fuel suddenly?

    • @pyroman2918
      @pyroman2918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@ronylouis0 From the context it's clear that I mean fossil fuel.

  • @truthserum5310
    @truthserum5310 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wendover and Mustard. My two favorite channels! Great content as always!

  • @Lukusprime
    @Lukusprime 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I live in a rural area next to a small airport. Because of the geography of where I live, the Air Force often trains around my area. My dad is an military aircraft buff and we have so much military air traffic that he can identify what specific type of aircraft is going overhead just by sound without having to look up. We have seen everything from Chinooks, Ospreys, numerous types of fighter jets, C-130s and C5 Galaxies. I say all this to say that I would welcome with open arms the prospect of another supersonic jet flying overhead. That noise is such an awesome thing to behold, in the most dictionary-definition sense of the word “awesome”.

  • @DanielSilva-fy6bo
    @DanielSilva-fy6bo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +377

    I wrote a paper on this exact topic back in 6th grade 8 years ago, it’s crazy how much of what I wrote is still in progress and still stands

    • @MrQuinnlord
      @MrQuinnlord 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Yah yah okay. If you're done patting yourself on the back I'd like to get back to the video

    • @4rsh193
      @4rsh193 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I kinda did this too, like 2 years ago I did my paper on just planes in general both military and civil, one was the concorde and well.....it was hard but worth it

    • @regulator5521
      @regulator5521 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@MrQuinnlord then watch the video bozo

    • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
      @ChaoticNeutralMatt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@MrQuinnlord but the comment wasn't stopping you from watching the video, you were

    • @guff9567
      @guff9567 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The way this narrator talks IS PATHETIC.

  • @AverytheCubanAmerican
    @AverytheCubanAmerican 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    When Jay-Z said "Bring back the Concorde", *I felt that*
    I got to go inside a British Airways Concorde as part of a tour at the Intrepid Museum in NYC, one of the few Concordes displayed outside Europe. And it was a pretty cool experience to be able to sit in the cockpit of the Concorde that made the fastest Transatlantic crossing by any commercial aircraft, the G-BOAD. The Concorde remains my favorite aircraft and I hope one day I'll be able to fly in a supersonic jet myself whether it be across the Atlantic or the Pacific. Boom is playing it smart by targeting that market in case countries don't change laws

    • @glenmcgillivray4707
      @glenmcgillivray4707 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I heard tales about Concord flights arriving in New York and other airports. Joining the queue. And getting pushed to near the top of the list of aircraft to get on the ground.
      They were actually terrible at subsonic flight in terms of fuel efficiency. Spending about half of their fuel over about a quarter of their journey. The other half was used to cover 3 times the distance.
      They were built to do one thing well. Supersonic flight. And that indeed they did.
      Which was why not only did they cross the atlantic at super fast speeds: they had effectively priority landing clearance too.
      Because Air traffic controllers knew they lacked a good endurance in holding pattern flight.
      Be curious to see what these new creations do to manage that.
      Engine technology has come a long way since the 1970s.

    • @counterfit5
      @counterfit5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@glenmcgillivray4707 aerodynamics have, too. It should be possible to have a plane that can fly Mach >1 and have it not suck fuel down like bottomless mimosas

    • @glenmcgillivray4707
      @glenmcgillivray4707 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@counterfit5 again. Concord was more fuel efficient with full afterburners than flying low and slow.
      The engines were properly sized for their intended role.
      Admittedly with new engines we might squeeze out 10-15% more endurance.
      With better aerodynamics maybe 10-20%.
      And with better crew conditions? Who knows.
      I hope they go ramjet like the old SR71 and let us push limits up to mach 3.
      We would have leaking planes to go faster than that. We don't have many materials to endure thermal expansion at these stresses.
      Which was why the SR71 despite being more fuel efficient the faster she flew, limited their speeds, and leaked on the runway despite constantly getting fuel tank seals re-sealed with every refit.
      The metal got hot, and it would break down the joining fuel proof seal materials.

    • @alexspareone3872
      @alexspareone3872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are places in the world, Russia and South Africa come to mind, where I believe you can already book a flight experience supersonic. In Russia its on a Mig 35 I think, which climbs vertically to be almost a spaceflight. Actually, the video doesnt mention that Mig considered building a civilian executive jet based on a stretched Mig 35. Personally, I would like to travel supersonin in a car!

    • @glenmcgillivray4707
      @glenmcgillivray4707 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexspareone3872 sonic booms at ground level create new complications. It is unlikely anything not bolted around rails is likely to go supersonic any time soon.

  • @k87upkid
    @k87upkid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    And... BOOM, Aerion is defunct!

  • @TomTom-cm2oq
    @TomTom-cm2oq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome! Thanks for this video!!

  • @ytzpilot
    @ytzpilot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    The Concorde never failed. An Aircraft that first flew in 1969, entered service in 1976, retired in 2003, was profitable and only had one loss is a success story, hardly a failure

    • @ireneuszpyc6684
      @ireneuszpyc6684 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      you act like a religious freak: you cherry-pick data to "prove" your favourite narrative

    • @SMlFFY85
      @SMlFFY85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I think the manufacturers and the French and British governments would disagree with you.

    • @sulil1938
      @sulil1938 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ireneuszpyc6684But you just contradicted yourself right there.... if there's anything that's more relevant regarding "cherry-picking data to prove/suit one's narrative" then that's definitely Mainstream Media. I don't think eyeing out one group to "prove" your narrative supports your statement, even though cherry-picking is mostly common with the media, politicians and political groups nowadays

    • @BeKindToBirds
      @BeKindToBirds 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      How did this comment inspire two absolutely idiotic political narrative builders to post? Grr religion, grr mainstream media ...mates, we were talking about the CONCORD which is an AIRPLANE.

    • @Inquiring
      @Inquiring 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Be Kind To Birds Lmao

  • @GeneralThargor
    @GeneralThargor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I used to live in Greenwich London, right under the approach path to Heathrow. These planes were LOUD even while landing and taking off. you always knew when concord came in by the sheer level of noise.

    • @davekp6773
      @davekp6773 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same but lived in Addlestone in Surrey and often watched her land and takeoff from just outside the airport perimeter. When servicing El-Al Cargo's Dell servers once, she taxied right past the window. El-Al had the best view of them all. Funnily enough, Air India Cargo and PIA Cargo were literally right next door to each other.

  • @thecure4470
    @thecure4470 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Concorde flew low over my house and no other plane has come near to dropping my jaw, wow I really miss it. 🤔

  • @allezvenga7617
    @allezvenga7617 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your sharing

  • @georgeprout42
    @georgeprout42 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Living 30 miles west of Heathrow, the boom wasn't a problem, but the roar of the engines made conversation impossible for about a minute as she flew overhead (on takeoff)
    I don't know anyone who doesn't miss that daily 11am roar. Right up until the end everyone would just look up and admire her flying past, then conversations would continue as the noise subsided. It was funny that the interruption wouldn't even be mentioned unless somebody was visiting and they brought it up.
    There was a lot of national pride in Concorde, I'm not sure that'll carry over to a new aircraft design.

    • @aurorawaxwing5866
      @aurorawaxwing5866 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think there is something more tolerable about those types of nuisances when there is pride in it. It is one thing to see something that is first of it kind but I don't want a loud polluting aircraft going overhead just so an airline can make a few more dollars and some rich people can show off there money. I honestly would be far more annoyed at the private jets than a loud passenger airline.

  • @Arteps1
    @Arteps1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Let's be real here, regardless of the cost. Emirates will be in the front door of Boom to grab a fleet of jets XD

    • @boroqouqouc
      @boroqouqouc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So do Etihad & Qatar

    • @jamesdinius7769
      @jamesdinius7769 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really. Note what he said. Regulations will prohibit it flying over Europe and Asia, where Emirates operates (correct me if I am wrong and they do actually opperate transantlantic or transpacific routes I don't know of).

  • @33moneyball
    @33moneyball ปีที่แล้ว +5

    High speed internet has hurt the viability as well. When certain business absolutely had to be conducted in person there was real value to cutting a 6 hour flight in half to some people. But with the ability to work the entire flight in spacious first class or on a private jet the time doesn’t matter as much.

  • @yourcomradebanana5559
    @yourcomradebanana5559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    talking about the noise I have f15's, helis, and from time to time c-130's land and take-off next to me almost every day, because I live next to tel nof, a major military airbase of the IDF. even though I thankfully don't hear the sonic boom because it only gets supersonic at high altitude I still hear engine noises, and they are loud...

  • @smush1414
    @smush1414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    I'm not flying on anything called Boom. I can just imagine the ironic 'Plane goes boom' headlines the day after the crash

  • @Dmcaoc
    @Dmcaoc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I grew up on the South coast of Ireland, the concord would go supersonic when it hit the Celtic sea and its sonic boom would rattle our windows twice a day. We were over 100m from a quiet rural road so it was far easier to hear distant sounds than it would be for most people still it was not even a minor annoyance, it's nothing compared to traffic noise from cars and trucks that the vast majority of people must endure. The big issue with supersonic flight is unsustainable fuel consumption.

    • @rongants6082
      @rongants6082 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are a peasant. The elites don't care about you. They are important, and want to go fast. Wear earplugs.

  • @spencerlegresley8258
    @spencerlegresley8258 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the quality of these videos keeps improving!

  • @ameralomari5922
    @ameralomari5922 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow what an amazing report. Great report and great montage. Everything is perfect.

  • @funkydozer
    @funkydozer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    As a kid in the UK, hearing the boom of Concorde every evening at around 7.20pm on it's flight path from New York to London, regular as clockwork, was normal. It didn't sound like a chainsaw in your hand. In fact, you could barely hear it at all, it was more a shockwave you felt accompanied by a single clap of VERY distant thunder. Windows rattled slightly for a second, seagulls took off, people looked up and smiled. That was it. We all knew what it was and accepted it. It never interfered with everyday life, it was PART of life, like a clock chiming that you stop hearing after a while. When the flights finally stopped, the lack of boom in the evenings was deafening for a long, long time.

    • @redhairdavid
      @redhairdavid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      you were hearing the boom from far off, it slowed down when approaching the land. the boom directly above you would be alot louder. (i assume this, i lived near a base for a while, the booms were nuts, so its a educated guess)

    • @funkydozer
      @funkydozer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@redhairdavid In Bristol I was directly below the flight path, I don't know what altitude Concorde was at that point so you could be right about it slowing down / speeding up. It would be interesting to make a flight plan in microsoft flight sim to see altitudes and determine where it used to hit mach 1 over Britain and the US, but my old pc would die if I even mentioned installing it. Concorde only went supersonic above 35000 feet or higher, so at ground level the boom is audible, but certainly not loud - even if it is directly overhead. When you consider the average cruising altitude at mach 2 was between 50000 and 60000 feet, noise on the ground really isn't an issue. Totally different story for fighter jets flying low though ;)

  • @doubleyousee72
    @doubleyousee72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +255

    Tbh, i just really hope that if they come back this time they are able to stay

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      If they offer business class seats I don't see why they won't stay.

    • @camdizzle
      @camdizzle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      But mr wendover man never talked about fuel and the inevitable damage that will cause do idk if it’ll be a big thing

    • @MangezDesPommes
      @MangezDesPommes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I hope they'll have a Droop Snoot

    • @KRYMauL
      @KRYMauL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@camdizzle If they don’t you can always ride in a rocket.

    • @doubleyousee72
      @doubleyousee72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KRYMauL rocketboi time 😂

  • @jacknicholson4220
    @jacknicholson4220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember going to a Flight museum (in Dunbar,Scotland if memory serves me correct) there was a concorde there and as a kid at the time I thought it was amazing

  • @hoej
    @hoej 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    6:37 2023 here.
    Aerion shuttered in 2021.
    Spike has gone quiet.
    Boom it would appear is still doing stuff. XB-1 still hasn't flown.

  • @GeographyPal
    @GeographyPal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    I love when he’s talking about BOOM’s partners and he’s just casually like yeah they’re backed by the US Air Force no biggie.

    • @cjcolehour2778
      @cjcolehour2778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      well that's mainly because the us airforce would like air force one to be a supersonic jet for whatever reason.

    • @playlets6465
      @playlets6465 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@cjcolehour2778 that makes sense, I mean imagine if Air Force One was like the SR-71. Missiles wouldn't have a chance of shooting it down

    • @gregorymazulli4854
      @gregorymazulli4854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@playlets6465 modern missiles can shoot down the sr-71, especially anti ICBM missiles that can intercept a re-entry vehicle at the edge of space, even the sr-71 is not immune to attack, NATO aircraft in a few exercises were able to get high enough to theoretically intercept and destroy the plane and at those altitudes and speed out turning a missile is impossible. I'm not against a supersonic air force one but speed and altitude is no longer a safe place because weapons technology keeps getting more and more advanced

    • @user-do5zk6jh1k
      @user-do5zk6jh1k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's not as impressive as it sounds. I was an Air Force cadet in the aero engineering program while they were there. They just rented our engine test room and one of our engines to gather data. We don't help them at all.

    • @user-do5zk6jh1k
      @user-do5zk6jh1k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Btw, the reason they came to us is because they are based in Denver and our campus is an hour south of them. There aren't many aircraft test facilities in Colorado, so we were their only choice.

  • @smileyeagle1021
    @smileyeagle1021 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Something that I think got left out of the discussion, when you mentioned that time on a plane is no longer unproductive time, is that very little business travel is going to be time critical at all. For things that are time critical, businesses will most likely turn to telepresence over travel. There is no need to get from New York to London by tomorrow morning to negotiate and sign an agreement, when you can now set up a Zoom call for the morning, negotiate your agreement, and then sign the agreement using a service like Docusign (you could even do hard copies and send them back and forth by mail if you need the hard copies for posterity).
    There still will be some need for urgent travel (eg we need an engineer that specializes in X to go to the field to inspect a broken X and determine a method to fix it) but most business travel is going to be something that is planned out weeks, if not months, in advance and will have great flexibility on when the travel occurs (eg we are opening a new branch and need to send out trainers to teach the management at the new location how to operate prior to opening, you could easily move that up or back a week or two without impacting operations too greatly).

  • @MrJohnBonett
    @MrJohnBonett 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really excellent analysis, thank you

    • @justins8802
      @justins8802 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not really, since I don’t think any of these projects have made progress in the last two years.
      Boom is dead in the water now that all the big engine manufacturers have declined to invest in an engine for it because of how much capital they would have to invest. Boom is trying to design their own engine now on the cheap and it will fail.

  • @Jimblefy
    @Jimblefy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vid. Thanks mate :)

  • @akirebara
    @akirebara 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    TBH, I just want high-speed railway, like the Shinkansen in Japan.

    • @EvdogMusic
      @EvdogMusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly! Trains don't have all the extra boarding & disembarking times that planes have.

    • @VanadiumBromide
      @VanadiumBromide 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I want a supersonic train.

  • @filmdetective
    @filmdetective 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    When you think about it, Concorde was an astonishing thing, especially for the time it was realized in

    • @asajayunknown6290
      @asajayunknown6290 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same era as the beginning of NASA. For certain things, govt funding and oversight used to work. Of course, this was before the ascendence of the MIC and their control of the purse strings.

    • @matwatson7947
      @matwatson7947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In the same way The Saturn V rocket was. It was highly impractical, exceptionally expensive, decades ahead of its time and because of that it has become an icon.

  • @MartinCHorowitz
    @MartinCHorowitz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Another Challenge for Commercial flights is the increased Ground time in the post 9/11 world.
    If you need to spend 2hrs on either end of a flight on the ground, knocking few hours off a shorter flight matters less. It would still help with longer haul routes like LA to Sydney if the plane has the range,

  • @NicksStuff
    @NicksStuff 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Also, today we've got Skype, Zoom and whatnot. They'll always be faster than flying across the ocean...

    • @mofayer
      @mofayer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep, just like how the airlines killed passenger ships, Internet communication will prevent any possibility of supersonic passenger flights.

  • @WanderwithSam
    @WanderwithSam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I remember hearing concord go over NJ once in a while. It was extremely loud. Even regular planes are sometimes loud.

  • @TimeBucks
    @TimeBucks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +352

    This is exciting

    • @itstomatogear6806
      @itstomatogear6806 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hehe

    • @cyberceel
      @cyberceel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It transports less people burning more fuel.. it's just not environmentally sensible.

    • @Lukepuke311
      @Lukepuke311 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure is

    • @Lukepuke311
      @Lukepuke311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@cyberceel bruh

    • @Osama-KIN_TMZ01
      @Osama-KIN_TMZ01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@cyberceel bruh

  • @samrupani4316
    @samrupani4316 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent documentary.

  • @mrhickman53
    @mrhickman53 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I recall visiting relatives in Oklahoma City in the '60's when sonic boom tests were being performed. I was a child then, but my recollection is I would want the sonic boom to be quite a bit quieter than what was generated during that testing.

  • @rustix3
    @rustix3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Would be nice to hear also about Tu-144 - the Soviet supersonic in this video.

  • @DoubleDDD
    @DoubleDDD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Correction
    at 8:27 you showed the logo of "Rolls Royce motor car limited" which is an entirely different company from the investor in boom, engine manufacturer "Rolls Royce PLC". They might share name but the are fully different company owned by different corporations.

    • @TheLocalLt
      @TheLocalLt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty sure they have the same logo, that was the very logo on the Malaysia Airlines engine piece that washed up

  • @bond007rules
    @bond007rules 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    BREAKING NEWS: Aerion confirmed today (21/5/21) they are shutting down. "In the current financial environment, it has proven hugely chellenging to close on the scheduled and necessary large new capital requirements" to being production of their AS2 jet, says the company.

  • @jman1948
    @jman1948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Aerion just announced they are shutting down, so maybe it isnt happening as soon as we would like.

  • @Th3M4larky
    @Th3M4larky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    10:34 "If successful, it will turn the perceived loudness of a sonic boom, from that of a chain saw, to a car...door...closing."
    *redline reviews* The jet makes a solid sounding *thunk*

    • @TheSpongiform
      @TheSpongiform 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Even without the sonic boom, that god damn concorde was LOUD. I grew up near Dulles air port and that damn plane directly over my house almost every day. Imagine living 10 feet from a train track, except it flies over your house.

    • @kelly2631
      @kelly2631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheSpongiform that's afterburning turbojets for ya