Sadly I was too exhausted and nodded off, so I couldn't participate in the discussion after reading the letter. But I think it is a very good first letter. I'm intrigued. Interesting premise and great idea with these 'allies' we can send everywhere. Well done, Matt - again. A few spoilery thought: - I think we need to focus on the people who are trying to LOSE these card games, the winners seem oblivious (and not very good players anyway) - find out what were the 'punishments' of losing before and go after that (like the phone thing) - also: I don't think it's a good idea to send the 15 year old girl to the stock exchange in 1929, she's not the one who could blend in there, also it could be potentially dangerous (all the men, money, power there...)
I can't believe I missed the live. catching up now so that the next one I'll be ready. 😊
22:10 what a great lead in.....
Sadly I was too exhausted and nodded off, so I couldn't participate in the discussion after reading the letter.
But I think it is a very good first letter.
I'm intrigued. Interesting premise and great idea with these 'allies' we can send everywhere.
Well done, Matt - again.
A few spoilery thought:
- I think we need to focus on the people who are trying to LOSE these card games, the winners seem oblivious (and not very good players anyway)
- find out what were the 'punishments' of losing before and go after that (like the phone thing)
- also: I don't think it's a good idea to send the 15 year old girl to the stock exchange in 1929, she's not the one who could blend in there, also it could be potentially dangerous (all the men, money, power there...)
45:19 oh, I thought they were playing for those accelerating stocks. which winning would be bad....in a month. hmmmm
why do I think the cheating at hearts has to do with the accelerating stocks? 33:57
DJ had a brilliant theory.
1:02:33 oh?! interesting....