Who were the secret service agents that viewed the film and had Abraham Zapruder seen the film prior to the meeting with life magazine on November 23rd? I believe that Life magazine did something that you would not see today in the media and that is they kept their word about how they would use the film. I can't believe the character of Abraham Zapruder in less than 24 hours after the crime and had the sense to do the right thing and I feel bad that this probably tortured him the rest of his life.
This is one program all of the Zapruder film Alterationists should see. They pretend that this film did not exist as these people clearly saw the film the day it was processed.
The banter at the end about "conspiracy theories" is lame and absurd. Saying Posner's book was good is preposterous. Just the fact that two dozen doctors from Parkland hospital described a huge exit wound at the rear occipital parietal is enough to prove the head shot was from the front. Of course there are dozens of other points of evidence proving a conspiracy. People like Stolley, who are part of corporate media are never going to admit that the very film he bought proves the conspiracy he denies.
@@joshcantrell8397 It is clear that Zapruder saw the film as soon as it was processed. The Secret Service did not 'confronted' him, they wanted to help him get the film processed and get a copy to examine themselves.
Those Life magazine dudes did not not want to talk about something!--a few issues after JFK was shot, Life published a few slides of the murder, right around that nasty frame 313...interestingly, they published a couple of the slides in reverse order!--suggesting that JFK,s head only moved forward after the fatal shot!....why they did that is cause for concern...one could speculate that they were towing the official line.....it is very suspicious, and Mr. Stolley should have been questioned about that!
I was so very young although I had been asked to observe the incident w/all the pointers leading up to a window I noticed alignment w/tree seeing someone climbing w/aim.
What was not said here...Life magazine, after a few years, sold the film back to Zapruder--for one dollar.....then, in 1978 there was another government investigation, by the House--they had the power, and decided to take the Z film under their authority--but they by law, were obligated to pay a fair market value to Zapruder for the film...by then, it was determined that the film was worth around $16 million dollars!!!....so the Zapruder family scored big time!...as they said, the film and camera is in the National Archives--forever.
Don’t forget the only reason why LIFE got the film was because they offered the highest bid. There was no upstanding morality behind LIFE magazine that made zapruder give them his film. It was only because of THE MONEY!
24:00 Dick agrees with Zapruder at 11PM to show up at 8 AM the next day and Zapruder has the film and shows it to Dick and 2 Secret Service agents. How did he get the film developed? The movie "Parkland," which is free on TH-cam now, shows that the Secret Service (not a reporter) were scrambling to get the film developed on Friday by going to the newspapers and then strongarming a guy who had little experience developing home movie film. I realize that the movie has elements that are invented for the film, I know this. But it still begs the question of how a dressmaker got film developed the same day in Dallas in 1963. The norm back then would have been to send film away, especially movie film, to a developing lab. You'd send it by mail or take it to a drug store and they would send it out. And it would take quite some time to get it back, even 10 years after this. So how did he get it developed?
Secret Service had this film on Friday before Dick saw it on Saturday. From Zapruder's wiki: Zapruder would later recall that he immediately knew that President Kennedy's wound was fatal as he saw the president's head "...explode like a firecracker."[18][22] Walking back to his office amid the confusion following the shots, Zapruder encountered The Dallas Morning News reporter Harry McCormick, who was standing near Zapruder and noticed he was filming the motorcade. McCormick was acquainted with Agent Forrest Sorrels of the Secret Service's Dallas office, and offered to bring Sorrels to Zapruder's office.[23][24] Zapruder agreed and returned to his office. McCormick later found Sorrels outside the Sheriff's office at Main and Houston, and together they went to Zapruder's office. Zapruder agreed to give the film to Sorrels on the condition it would be used only for investigation of the assassination. The three then took the film to the television station WFAA to be developed. After it was realized that WFAA was unable to develop Zapruder's footage, the film was taken to Eastman Kodak's Dallas processing plant later that afternoon where it was immediately developed. As the Kodachrome process requires different equipment for duplication than for simple development, Zapruder's film was not developed until around 6:30 p.m. The original developed film was taken to the Jamieson Film Company, where three additional copies were exposed; these were returned to Kodak around 8 p.m. for processing. Zapruder kept the original, plus one copy, and gave the other two copies to Sorrels, who sent them to Secret Service headquarters in Washington.
Dick doesn't mention that the Secret Service helped him develop it on Friday and saw the film by Friday evening. Dick portrays this as if he was the first to see the film, the next day.
Jay Watson was the first one to try to develop the film while he interviewed Zap on live TV shortly after the assassination. Couldn't do it there so they went to Kodak and Jameison. By Friday evening Zap is showing the film several times. Sorrels takes control of the situation.
The truth hurts....so what?...Even the Agent, Clint Hill, has said many times that they did fail that day...he turned to alcohol for many years after the event.
Wow. And I was born and raised in the USA and taught we were the most racist, misogynistic, anti-Semitic, and homophobic and transphobic culture that ever existed…. Kinda makes you wonder… 🤔
Not many people have considered this, but the Zapruder film was under their control for several weeks, and needless to say, it was doctored too.... especially around the frames between the 1st bullet and the fatal shot, and also that the motor-cade actually stopped - but never shown... WHY? We will never have the complete picture - but we have enough jigsaw pieces to determine what happened and who was behind it!!!!!
@@johnpersechini4951 I suspect his film was not even used as someone near him was shooting film and it was used.. The whole thing about an notarized document thingy never rang true in such an event.. at any rate the film was altered at hawkeye works--- look up doug horne.. abe was confused by his own film in court room... my only concern he had a copy weekend of assassination of what he shot un altered- mystery...
@@wallacebell4311 the warren comission is a conspiracy book which i move to the fiction section in the library when i see it in a library.. there are 2000 copies of the 26 volumes counting some in private hands..
@@bradleysmall2230no it wasn’t. See some evidence. Not this happens that happens you conspiracy. Idiots come up with all kinds of stupid crap with absolutely no evidence to back you up.
lf that is the opinion about LBJ and his lack of any direct or indirect involvement, you clearly know nothing about him, his character, nor his history.
So Stolley says without blinking an eye that Oswald shot Tippit in cold blood. Not that he was the accused murderer, who had never been proven guilty in a trial. Outrageous!
Of course Oswald was the accused mureder of Tippet; and lots of witnesses independently agreed it was Oswald. The CT author Mark Lane invented the idea that 'other people' were actually seen shooting Tippet, not Oswald. What a lying creep.
I was 7 years old and I can remember to this day my mother and father crying but I didn't know why
AlexZapruder is very accomplished on her own.
Fascinating to hear about Zapuder's life.
Who were the secret service agents that viewed the film and had Abraham Zapruder seen the film prior to the meeting with life magazine on November 23rd? I believe that Life magazine did something that you would not see today in the media and that is they kept their word about how they would use the film. I can't believe the character of Abraham Zapruder in less than 24 hours after the crime and had the sense to do the right thing and I feel bad that this probably tortured him the rest of his life.
This is one program all of the Zapruder film Alterationists should see. They pretend that this film did not exist as these people clearly saw the film the day it was processed.
The banter at the end about "conspiracy theories" is lame and absurd. Saying Posner's book was good is preposterous.
Just the fact that two dozen doctors from Parkland hospital described a huge exit wound at the rear occipital parietal is enough to prove the head shot was from the front.
Of course there are dozens of other points of evidence proving a conspiracy. People like Stolley, who are part of corporate media are never going to admit that the very film he bought proves the conspiracy he denies.
Of course he saw it first
Actually, I take that back. They might have immediately confronted him right there on the spot
@@joshcantrell8397 It is clear that Zapruder saw the film as soon as it was processed. The Secret Service did not 'confronted' him, they wanted to help him get the film processed and get a copy to examine themselves.
Skip the first 7 minutes. Lot of nonsense.
Those Life magazine dudes did not not want to talk about something!--a few issues after JFK was shot, Life published a few slides of the murder, right around that nasty frame 313...interestingly, they published a couple of the slides in reverse order!--suggesting that JFK,s head only moved forward after the fatal shot!....why they did that is cause for concern...one could speculate that they were towing the official line.....it is very suspicious, and Mr. Stolley should have been questioned about that!
I was so very young although I had been asked to observe the incident w/all the pointers leading up to a window I noticed alignment w/tree seeing someone climbing w/aim.
Someone is full of something...and you know it's you
What in god's name is that supposed to mean?
Wtf are you trying to say/mean/insinuate/delineate….?
How come the secret service didn't confiscate the Zapruder film ?
What was not said here...Life magazine, after a few years, sold the film back to Zapruder--for one dollar.....then, in 1978 there was another government investigation, by the House--they had the power, and decided to take the Z film under their authority--but they by law, were obligated to pay a fair market value to Zapruder for the film...by then, it was determined that the film was worth around $16 million dollars!!!....so the Zapruder family scored big time!...as they said, the film and camera is in the National Archives--forever.
@@curbozerboomer1773 Thank you !
They followed Kennedy's car to the hospital and were preoccupied with that. they wouldn't have known about it right at the time anyway.
Love your channel :)
A very sad day.
Don’t forget the only reason why LIFE got the film was because they offered the highest bid. There was no upstanding morality behind LIFE magazine that made zapruder give them his film. It was only because of THE MONEY!
Don't forget, you have no good reason to say that. If you're honest, you know you don't know that at all.
So he should have just given the film away?
Not true. Zapruder did not consider other bids because he trusted LIFE.
@@BarbaraJoanneBJ yep!
@@peterfraser9070 so you know the truth? LIFE magazine was the only morally superior publication at the time?
Good interviews.
24:00 Dick agrees with Zapruder at 11PM to show up at 8 AM the next day and Zapruder has the film and shows it to Dick and 2 Secret Service agents. How did he get the film developed? The movie "Parkland," which is free on TH-cam now, shows that the Secret Service (not a reporter) were scrambling to get the film developed on Friday by going to the newspapers and then strongarming a guy who had little experience developing home movie film. I realize that the movie has elements that are invented for the film, I know this. But it still begs the question of how a dressmaker got film developed the same day in Dallas in 1963. The norm back then would have been to send film away, especially movie film, to a developing lab. You'd send it by mail or take it to a drug store and they would send it out. And it would take quite some time to get it back, even 10 years after this. So how did he get it developed?
Alexandra later says "to get it developed, incredibly complicated" but then talks about their feelings a lot,
Secret Service had this film on Friday before Dick saw it on Saturday.
From Zapruder's wiki: Zapruder would later recall that he immediately knew that President Kennedy's wound was fatal as he saw the president's head "...explode like a firecracker."[18][22] Walking back to his office amid the confusion following the shots, Zapruder encountered The Dallas Morning News reporter Harry McCormick, who was standing near Zapruder and noticed he was filming the motorcade. McCormick was acquainted with Agent Forrest Sorrels of the Secret Service's Dallas office, and offered to bring Sorrels to Zapruder's office.[23][24] Zapruder agreed and returned to his office. McCormick later found Sorrels outside the Sheriff's office at Main and Houston, and together they went to Zapruder's office.
Zapruder agreed to give the film to Sorrels on the condition it would be used only for investigation of the assassination. The three then took the film to the television station WFAA to be developed. After it was realized that WFAA was unable to develop Zapruder's footage, the film was taken to Eastman Kodak's Dallas processing plant later that afternoon where it was immediately developed. As the Kodachrome process requires different equipment for duplication than for simple development, Zapruder's film was not developed until around 6:30 p.m. The original developed film was taken to the Jamieson Film Company, where three additional copies were exposed; these were returned to Kodak around 8 p.m. for processing. Zapruder kept the original, plus one copy, and gave the other two copies to Sorrels, who sent them to Secret Service headquarters in Washington.
Dick doesn't mention that the Secret Service helped him develop it on Friday and saw the film by Friday evening. Dick portrays this as if he was the first to see the film, the next day.
Jay Watson was the first one to try to develop the film while he interviewed Zap on live TV shortly after the assassination. Couldn't do it there so they went to Kodak and Jameison. By Friday evening Zap is showing the film several times. Sorrels takes control of the situation.
@@KenDanieli Zapruder was interviewed by Jay Watson while he was at WFAA.
31:00 Dick raises his hand and exclaims that Secret Service failed. We don't need him to say that in that way. I don't like this guy.
The truth hurts....so what?...Even the Agent, Clint Hill, has said many times that they did fail that day...he turned to alcohol for many years after the event.
Secret Service did not failed, they allowed the murder, it was an execution.
Lot of chatter before this gets started. Talking about LIFE, which was relevant 50 years ago. I'm waiting. He's still babbling. GET TO IT.
Wow. And I was born and raised in the USA and taught we were the most racist, misogynistic, anti-Semitic, and homophobic and transphobic culture that ever existed…. Kinda makes you wonder… 🤔
Not many people have considered this, but the Zapruder film was under their control for several weeks, and needless to say, it was doctored too.... especially around the frames between the 1st bullet and the fatal shot, and also that the motor-cade actually stopped - but never shown... WHY? We will never have the complete picture - but we have enough jigsaw pieces to determine what happened and who was behind it!!!!!
Yes, LHO was behind it - a rifle in the TSBD building.
@formermpc10 LHO wasn't even in the building! Wake up.
where'd you get the silly idea that the film was doctored, the limos topped completely??
LHO wasn't even in the building! Wake up: You must be gnorant of any details of this case.
@peter Fraser You, Sir, obviously haven't studied this. Jack White has proven the Z film and others were doctored.
did stole know the film went to NPIC sat and sun night after the assassdination
Definitely no doctoring of the Z Film.
@@peterfraser9070 you will never figure it out until you accept the film is altered
@@bradleysmall2230 What specifically was changed in the film?
@@peterfraser9070 definitely the rear head occipatal wound blacked out..
most likely car stop, gradual frame excision to romove exit debris to rear hitting police men and as an artifact speeding up that part w frame removal
One thing that is true about that day,when you consider the hostility towards kennedy in dallas ,the secret service agents did a terrible job
There are nuts with guns all over this country. And there were back then, too.
Why did Bobby Kennedy get shot in LA?
Your familys unpleasant thoughts about the film are helped with 16 million dollars.
Lol yeah I’m sure. I mean I can understand it was a burden for Abraham but she wasn’t even alive then.
@@johnpersechini4951 I suspect his film was not even used as someone near him was shooting film and it was used.. The whole thing about an notarized document thingy never rang true in such an event.. at any rate the film was altered at hawkeye works--- look up doug horne.. abe was confused by his own film in court room... my only concern he had a copy weekend of assassination of what he shot un altered- mystery...
@@wallacebell4311 the warren comission is a conspiracy book which i move to the fiction section in the library when i see it in a library.. there are 2000 copies of the 26 volumes counting some in private hands..
@@bradleysmall2230 Doug Horne was a flake conspiracy guy!...see the book Reclaiming History for the full story on this creep!
@@bradleysmall2230no it wasn’t. See some evidence. Not this happens that happens you conspiracy. Idiots come up with all kinds of stupid crap with absolutely no evidence to back you up.
lf that is the opinion about LBJ and his lack of any direct or indirect involvement, you clearly know nothing about him, his character, nor his history.
SafePet Haven i
All I know is he planned the hanoi bombing after a bad thai meal. He wore lifts in his cowboy boots he was only 5'3 barefoot.
@@leemoore9933 you're dreaming
So Stolley says without blinking an eye that Oswald shot Tippit in cold blood. Not that he was the accused murderer, who had never been proven guilty in a trial. Outrageous!
Of course Oswald was the accused mureder of Tippet; and lots of witnesses independently agreed it was Oswald. The CT author Mark Lane invented the idea that 'other people' were actually seen shooting Tippet, not Oswald. What a lying creep.
Is Covid a conspiracy too? I'm dead serious asking this.
@@peterfraser9070 *Yes it is.* Utoob won't allow my comment with proof of this....for some unknown reason.
@@williamwhitten7820 Maybe TH-cam is part of a cover up.
@@williamwhitten7820 Oh you have "Proof" Covid is a conspiracy? Pleeeeeease.