So much for "Arab unity." I don't know about other arab nations, but I was never taught any of this. We only ever hear about the war in Yemen, but never the details, and especially not the rivalries behind it. Everything is America this, America that. And I get they're to blame for a lot of thing along with the colonial states, but fucking hell did Arab rulers plunge the entire region to the depth of fucking hell for power, control and influence. There was never Arab unity to begin with. Just a bunch of people "uniting" by killing the previous rulers and going on a conquest to claim the rest of the lands. It's a shame and a disgrace for everyone living today the humility that was brought about by their greed that was further reinforced by ignorant populations.. everyone today is paying the price for what they have done.
I am a Yemeni, and I love all my Arab brothers, but I don't think it is right to unite like that, we have a lot of diffirent things that set us aside, diffirent religions, tribes, history, culture, ideologies, and even language, we have a lot of dialects, a lot of non-Arabs that live with us and within our own countries, I feel it is good that way, or maybe some countries can unite, the ones that are so close to eachother in everything, maybe Oman and Yemen, Saudi and UAE, Syria and Lebanon, Somalia and Djibouti, but other than those unifications, it is not right to unite all of us together like that.
u r arab by any chance if so then from where i wanna ask u some stuff firstly do u belive someone like husni mubarak to be a dictator or al jolani secondly did ur region have a war and did u live through any war
arab unity was a lie it never was an actual option because of the people leading it arabs now are good as is if they unity like how the gulf has by not uniting as one nation but uniting in economy and bothership, groups like the baath party have ruined arab countries more than helping iraq and syria are the greatest examples but without baath in syria look at how fast they are begining to progress
Rejection of other things as the corner stone in the belief system and tribal nature of the populace. So everyone has their slightly different view that leads to rejection and nepotism and the need to cement your position. The only solution is to rebel and replace - but if you hold the same concepts, your alternative is just a different shade of the same.
just a small correction, the protests that called for nasser's comeback are largely seen in egypt as being staged by nasser himself from before his resignation, and that he didnt seriously consider resigning, and there are pointers to it being suspect in the course of events. I wish you painted it more as a controversial matter rather than as a fact of public support (nasser was in fact, as unpopular as he was popular)
Bro he never thought of leaving power any second, he knew he got his ass wipped and humiliated by the Israelis so he had to do another play like he always do
2:31 thats because he was half Kurdish. 5:47 the CIA literally gave Saddam a list of people they didn't like and he wiped them all out. 8:13 he was wrong and was just asking the french for power. Muslims and alawites such as Sheikh Saleh Ali fought alonside eachother against the french. So he is wrong. 10:12 that was ironic coming from nasser who was very anti religious. He imprisoned islamic scholars and mocked the headscarf. 11:33 that is an understatement. The army of assad literally flattened the entire city with no remorse for civilians. 16:23 he was one of the mostly tyrannical kings in yemeni history. Him and his dynasty claimed to be descended from the prophet and used their lineage to justify their hereditary rule. The houthis are doing the same thing now in yemen. They have documents that say they have the divine right to rule over yemen. 21:30 I disagree. Faisal rejected pan arabism and had a pan islamic outlook. 22:48 Yes, in the case of Yemen it is indeed a bit more complicated. The Shias in Yemen are Zaydis, and their beleifs are more similar to sunnis then the mainstream shias. Secterianism only truly began in Yemen in 2004, when badreddin al houthi converted from Zaydi Shiism to the Iranian Jafari Shiism. 26:13 This region (eastern Yemen ans Western Oman) is an ancient region known as Hadhramaut. 52:25 I disgaree with his statement because it is extreme and implies that raising children is not of any value.
when i heard the music i was like: "wait a sec, this is from the game Suzerain" which makes it 10 times better, and the fact that the artstile looks somewhat near the game art, and Suzerain is a game about story and hard politics makes it all the better.
Just a small note: Resolution 242 is deliberately ambiguous regarding the "Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied," in the 6 day war. It is noted by those who worked to write on it that it was intentionally left vague as to be subject to interpretation regarding how much Israel would be required to vacate. "I have been asked over and over again to clarify, modify or improve the wording, but I do not intend to do that. The phrasing of the Resolution was very carefully worked out, and it was a difficult and complicated exercise to get it accepted by the UN Security Council. I formulated the Security Council Resolution. Before we submitted it to the Council, we showed it to Arab leaders. The proposal said 'Israel will withdraw from territories that were occupied', and not from 'the' territories, which means that Israel will not withdraw from all the territories." -- Foreign Secretary of the UK George Brown "That means that you can’t justify holding onto territory merely because you conquered it. We could have said: well, you go back to the 1967 line. But I know the 1967 line, and it’s a rotten line. You couldn’t have a worse line for a permanent international boundary. It’s where the troops happened to be on a certain night in 1948. It’s got no relation to the needs of the situation. Had we said that you must go back to the 1967 line, which would have resulted if we had specified a retreat from all the occupied territories, we would have been wrong. In New York, what did we know about Tayyibe and Qalqilya? If we had attempted in New York to draw a new line, we would have been rather vague. So what we stated was the principle that you couldn’t hold territory because you conquered it, therefore there must be a withdrawal to - let’s read the words carefully - 'secure and recognized boundaries.'" -- Lord Caradon
UN Resolution 242 doesn't require Israel to withdraw from all territories. It merely required Israel to withdraw from "territories" so as to leave wiggle room in negotiations.
Make video about Islam and Christianity in Indonesia please. As an Indonesian, Islam didn't really come with trade like most of popular historians believe especially to what happened with my ethnic groups, an indigenous ethnic group in the middle of North Sumatran jungles and Bukit Barisan mountain range near the largest vulcanic lake in the world. In 1539, Acehnese Sultanate invaded my ancestors's land when one of our king refused Islam. Aceh faced difficulties during the war then they bought & hired Ottoman weapons & mercenaries to invade us, our people freaked out then asked Portugal to help 'em to stop the invasion of Aceh and Ottoman Empire. In the 1810s during Padri War, an Islamic civil war in Minangkabau, Padri soldiers heard a cannibalistic pagan tribes in the middle of North Sumatra who remained as pagans, the Padris sent envoys to our kingdom to demand our people to leave our paganistic religion and became Muslims but got rejected. After the rejection, Padri soldiers invaded our kingdom and massacred 200.000 people and arrested our king, when he refused Islam, they executed our king for not accepting Islam, they brutally ransacked our villages/cities & massacred my ethnic groups who refused their religion. They were failed to conquer us when a cholera outbreak happened thanks to dead bodies that leaked cholera. After they failed to conquer us, our ancestors were devastated after watching our ransacked kingdoms and dead relatives even cholera outbreak happened and severely decimated our population. My ancestors became hostile towards outsiders/foreigners. Years later, a couple of US Baptist missionarists came and introduced Christianity. Too bad, the locals thought they were another hostile foreigners/outsiders and they caught & ate them. Before Christianity came, my people were pagans who had cannibalistic culture/rituals. My ancestors conducted cannibalism towards people who did terrible crimes such as rape, murder, or treason. A defendant was brought in front of judge, if the judge found the defendant conducted heinous crimes, he/she would be tied on an altar then a shaman who was also executioner would recited some mantras and slashed the defendant's body before beheading him/her and being eaten by people. POWs were also eaten back then. Before Christianity, my ancestors believed if we ate people, it'd grant us magical strength. We also did child sacrifice ritual by sacrificing li'l boys to gain black magic. Besides cannibalism and child sacrifice, my ancestors were known as jewellery makers and weavers. A German missionarist came and introduced Christianity among my people. He built schools, hospitals, etc. But a lot of kingdom citizens hated him coz Christianity could destroy our culture and religion such as our cannibalistic rituals. There're some reports that some people tried to assassinate him to stop Christianity from destroying our old faiths and culture but failed. Cannibalism and child sacrifice were eventually banned when Dutch colonial regime imposed anti cannibalism law towards us after annexing us in the 1907. If Christianity never came, perhaps my people would still do capital punishment in form of cannibalism and child sacrifice. Unlike other Indonesian regions which were colonized for 350 years, we only got conquered in 1907 when Dutch soldiers succesfully assassinated our priest king. Dutch faced difficulties at fighting a cannibalistic nation in the middle of Sumatran jungles near the largest lake in Indonesia
iirc Islam started to get prominent when one ruler of Indonesia needed military support from the Ottomon empire and so vowed to turn Islam into state religion in exchange or something like thag
great video and series, could you make the next (or some future) series about argentina. ever since its new president came into power it jas become a more and more talked about nation and i would love to have its history presented with your in depth style
24:05 the egyptians didn't even use chimecal weapons against Izzy settlements on their own land during the two wars for its liberation even though they had Scud missiles and helical weapon factories. So, No, I wouldn't buy the Islamist monarchic slaver kings propaganda that they did so to yemenis in the war to liberate them from said slaver kings 19:48 spends a few minutes explaining how the slaver kings were kidnapping pilgrims and enslaving them; then right away calling reporting that at the time as propaganda
Interesting nuance. Opportunistically revealing a true for very selfish and biased motives with intentions that might not be in the interests of the people you are reporting on? The Soviet Union probably spun a particular angle on the Nazis in an effort to influence Eastern Europe to fall more in its sphere of influence. "Nazis are bad" can be true but the reporting may not be full of integrity if it tries to convince people "therefore join the Soviet Union that's a great idea" "People we hate are doin somethin bad we think you should let us be in charge of everything forever" Most likely the only way we ever hear about any wrongdoing is actually through propaganda that we should be cautious of trusting too much. That's just how media always works, even researched information. You are likely attempting to report honestly but you have very little way of knowing how much the KGB the CCP MI6 and the CIA can truly influence the sources you are forced to rely on. In fact propaganda manipulations about history and reporting may even be morally justified or even necessary if distorting the truth of the record from the public's knowledge is through some convoluted sequence some absolutely necessary part of preventing open nuclear war. Few other justifications could excuse conspiracy and corruption on the scale of incessant global microwars, but preventing large scale nuclear war, it would be justifiable to taint all the records here and there in little ways that civilian academics without Top Secret clearances and oaths would find difficult to penetrate.
And I respect you as being of exceptional quality among any like us who are limited to work with what is declassified. Since you are not in trouble you are not accessing any secrets. What that means however is that you are unfairly handicapped and unable to report or research on what is most of interest. Since you like not being in military prison, lol. But you collect and collate and summarize the declassified stuff extremely conveniently for amateur students and hobbyists giving us a marginal fighting chance to have a semblance of understanding the context of our surroundings. It is no failing on the academic reporter's part if they don't have Top Secret clearance from over a dozen nations across a myriad maze of opposing factions. Just means anyone can extrapolate there's just a limit on what we can actually know. What anyone knows is only what is official public statements that, let us be honest, is the version intended for the enemy to read. In all cases. Anything told to a true actual ally is, of course, secured. Often it's useful to tell the enemy the truth, but you'd still only do that to manipulate them.
Remember your “What the Axis Powers Wanted” video? You could make a similar one but about the “Axis of Evil” (Russia, Iran, China), talking about Iran’s Cold War in the Middle East, Russia’s desires in Eastern Europe, and extreme nationalist chinese wanting to annex Siberia and the Himalayas. So basically, what the Axis states wanted, but a modern version.
Well Russia seems to want reclaim places that Russian speakers in them ( that’s why they invaded Ukraine) while china desires Taiwan and the South China Sea idk what Iran wants though
Iran wants to make middle east shia extremists, Russia wants nato bases out of ukraine(although NATO did this because Putin was making Ukraine pro russian... something like Georgia nowadays) and china? China said to US to leave Taiwan alone as it is a "part" of china but america was like How dare lowly iranians have a say? How dare chinese have an opinion? How dare russians want something? To be fair if we said OK to US, we would have become as weak as souther americas so at that point it was either being weak or being an enemy... and weak lmao
Who is the guy depicted in the portrait that comes up when Jabzy mentions the Syrian communist party? He comes up multiple times but I didn't clock a name anywhere
29:51 I want to clarify here that the region of touat with its various villages and even the city of Bechar were under control and protection of the Algerian nation under Emir Abdelkader 1830-1846 and were under control of the Regency of Algiers since 1554-1830. Only when the central power in Algiers had fallen did Morocco try laying claims to these regions, which is considered an invasion of a foreign state
Let's be honest. If Italy and the UK had never intervened in north Africa and Arabia, or the Greeks never had threatened the Turks at 1919-1922, Arabs WOULD still be part of the Ottoman Caliphate. Tribalism and the inconceivable factionalism that dominates the vast majority of Arabs means that a state is run by purely personal interests. This leaves them vulnerable to foreign intervention. So dictators, with foreign aid and the back up from some disgrunted army officers, can rule over millions with relatively ease.
There is absolutely no way in any conceivable timeline that deviated past the 1890’s that the Ottaman Caliphate would have been allowed to continue to exist. Regardless of WW1 every other power in Europe was determined to break it up.
@@nouhowlmao2809the difference is that you can read the history of their beginning the Ottoman Empire didn't enter middle east with war our ancestors is who asked the help Ottoman empire to protect them from the west Crusaders this why you see the west is angry when they see Turkeya is try involve or just help Arab country the west is afraid the Ottoman Empire will come back as if the west ever cared about us 😒 we all wish we never leaved Ottoman empire but we can't say it outloud
I don't want to be this guy but Alois is pronounced as its spelled as its a German name, I served with a guy from the same village as Brunner in the Austrian Army
Depends on what you mean as a dictatorship, because most, and I mean most of these dictatorships actually functioned. For example Gaddafist Libya worked out successfully for those 42 years, Saddam, well we all had disputes but under him Iraq was greater then g es today. Syrian bathaist parties need to go. I’m being honest, they need to go. For the Iraqi coup, the Arab unity wasn’t gonna happen. Not in a million years. But, the monarchy in Arab countries is a FAT L if I’m being honest. Sudan, there trying their best to hold onto themselves and as much land as possible. Kinda feel bad for Sudan ngl.
Honest question, why did you single out syria there but claim irak and libya were fine before? What exactly did Syria do wrong that the other two did not?
Why is monarchy a "fat L"? Only the monarchies seemed to have actually survived and stabilized while the Gaddafi, Saddam, Assad, etc. all collapsed. Maybe if muslims wanted peace with Israel, all would be good
@PrimetimeX monarchy's don't do anything special they are just permanent american puppet states or are lucky enough to be far away of Israel desired lands to actually afford being a real state like Oman
Woooooow Syria's guy is gone!!!!!!!!!! Thank you Jabzy for shedding light on Syria's early republics which will become highly important as people should rediscover Syria's sophisticated political past
@@Smokryliowhy not ? After all Syrians don't want more wars they already got enough of it, and we Arabs or foreigners shouldnt demand from them to enter to another war for Palestine, give the dudes a break they have been suffering for 13 years ffs
@@AyariAymen-q9f bro has never spoken seen or even interacted with syrian in there life. Yes syrians are pro Palestinian Israel is currently invading Syria syrians don't like to get invaded and have there Arab brothers be massacred
@Smokrylio I didn't say that my guy, it's just one of these moments where history and current events colide and I think it's understandible to be excited for it.
Instability in the Middle East is clearly a feature, not a bug😕 Even if westerners never came there or modern Israel didn't come to be, the region would still be unstable due to their geography and especially their culture.
Yeah it’s the unfortunate reality, dictators no matter what are always gonna go into wars I guess the best thing for us is to hope for a day to come where peace happens
Jabzy, For the life of you reply to the this comment because I want to understand your mindset behind doing this. Is this a case study you're doing behind the middle east? You know TH-cam is a big world right? You're just circling around events in the middle east and you're not addressing the real causes with questions like this title and even for this video like you didn't mention how Nasser centralised power in Egypt in the hands of the army who literally run the country or how Algeria is also run by the military and the religious infighting of each country and you're just mentioning wars and who backed them from institute research studies but you're not mentioning anything from the current causes and of course these videos aren't bringing much of a revenue with these low view counts in return for your editing and voiceover so why? What's the reason behind this 24 videos series and the "series" idea when you could do some really nice videos on recent topics with irl footage? You have plummeted your channel's visibility from the history side of TH-cam after the history of China video and now you're talking about a region that doesn't even watch English TH-cam that much and nobody cares about because you know... endless fighting. You know these videos aren't going to be revisited again because they lack many things so why? Jabzy gives the hint of Jaber but your channel's handle includes Joe in it so I might get it if you're of middle eastern origins but if you're not then this is useless because the people from this region that I was doomed to be born in has to listen to this in arabic not English to learn something but I guess you're free to do what you want with your life and I'm just saying spend it wisely bro.
As an Egyptian I hated Gamal Abdel Nasser He was a stupid dictator who lost Sinai and entered wars that exhausted Egypt in the name of failed Arab nationalism
Great analysis, thank you! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
Dictator is just the word used for illegitimate monarchies. If you observe medieval European history, all kings were also 'dictators'. This pattern is not special nor exclusive to the middle east.
My take on the question: The Arab republics will continue to go from coup to coup and from dictatorship to dictatorship is because of the fact that the best paying jobs in these so-called republics is being the president of these republics. The best paying job in Egypt is being the president of Egypt. The best paying job in Iraq is being the president of Iraq. Same with Libya, Syria, Algeria, Tunisia and Yemen. You can’t make serious money in those countries unless you’re in power because they all share one thing in common; unproductive and undeversified economies. That is it to say, they make most of their money through one or two channels, typically tourism and/or natural resources with everything else lagging behind or making up a very small portion of the pie. These are feudal/rent economies i.e you don’t make money by making things to sell them off rather you make money by collecting rent to allow use of your assets and how do you collect rent? By being the landlord (president). Unless you’re born into a very wealthy family your surest way to become wealthy is to be in or around power. If you notice that each and every president over the last 70 years or so in the so called Arab republics all come from humble beginnings. And they typically go into the military or secret service. They’re all ambitious men that didn’t have the opportunity to financially better themselves through other means. Compare and contrast with the west; the best paying job in the US isn’t being the president of the US. The best paying job in France isn’t being the president of France. Same with the UK, Spain, Germany, Portugal and all the OECD countries. You’re better off starting a business and putting your energy into competing in the free market and leaving politics to those who actually have an interest in it. The president of an Arab republic is effectively an economic role not a political one.
Qasim was never really aligned with the Iraqi Communist Party as he refused to share power with them, never legalised the party and jailed its members. My source is _Red Star Over Iraq, Iraqi Communism before Saddam_ (2011) by Johan Franzen
Man the Soviet Union really poisoned the decolonization of both Africa and the Middle East with their arms sales, training of officers in their ideology and other similar actions.
@wolfneumann9675 This is a ludicrous comment. Civil wars even today in Africa and the Middle East are equipped by Soviet/Russian gear, from the AK-47s to the T-55s and RPG-7s.
@@ThePhiphler…buuuuut they also use American equipment. M16s are found from Peru to papua. America was more into the “regime change” thing during the Cold War rather than arms sales but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen
@@malegria9641 Magnitude matters. If the typical African civil war can accurately be described as a series of AK-47 battles, going "what about M16?" is not valid analysis.
I recommend watching “The conflict based on a lie” by GDF. It says a lot about what the Israeli and American officials during the 1967 war were saying. It’s quite revealing.
you must otherwise ask the question why it is the region where it is teeming with American bases in all the Gulf countries with dictatorial monarchies but protected because they are totally submissive. and the rest other Arab regimes that you categorize as "wicked and dictatorial" with your arrogant Western standards that ignore the specificity of these peoples ... are in reality the only ones who refuse to collaborate who are not conciliatory with American policy so you decide with criminal cynicism to bring them down either by an invasion as happened in Iraq or by interference by fomenting civil wars and supporting terrorist groups often Islamist as a legitimate interlocutor as an alternative to the wicked pan-Arab regime that you do not like
Or you could ask why Baathists in Iraq and Syria hated each other. Or why Syrians quickly rose up aganist Nasser. Or why the Egyptians and Saudis funded proxy wars in Northern Yemen. Or why the Communists in Southern Yemen would shoot each other in the Politburo. Or why in the Lebanese Civil War Shia fought Shia, Christian fought Christian, Druze fought Druze and they all fought each other. Or why the Egyptians and Libyans fought one another. Or why Syria, Iran and Iraq all funded Kurdish rebels in the other nations. Or why the PUK and KDP fought one another. Or why Saddam only promoted people from within his own tribe. Or why Alawites persecuted people in Syria. Or why Islamist groups constantly rise up in North African Nations. Or why Morocco and Algeria fought. Or why Algeria funded rebels in Western Sahara. Or why Libya funded rebels in Sudan, including, South Sudan. Or why Jordan ousted the PLO. Or why the PLO would fight Hamas. Or why the Iraqi invaded Kuwait............ but I suppose, we can just say America for all that?
Are you dumb? Its always the same with these idiots. “ItS iSlAm” at everything that happens in the middle east. You know what, fine. Explain how the “fundamental structure of islamic culture” causes these dictators? Even when everything they do goes against islam, and ironically the worst ones were secularists.
??? Are you on meth or something??? In some of the most tribal places in the Arab world (e.g. Algeria, Saudi Arabia) there isn’t any violence. In the Algerian civil war of the 90s, it wasn’t on tribal lines, and the Tuareg tribal areas of the south saw peace during a war so bloody it’s now called “the black decade”.
Why is jerbzy still making content on ME history? He neither speaks nor reads the language, and is only able to cite second hand NSA/Crown approved resources.This task ought be left to qualified individuals, not alt-right-z. Abd El-Nasser was the bane of britannia/colonialism, he's the only man Robert McNamara wrote a whole book about.
By that logic he can't cover any history except modern English speaking nations. Can't even cover the medivial age in England because he doesn't speak old/middle English.
I wouldnt trust Islamic historians with writing an accurate grocery list. Everything and anything they write down is propaganda that can’t insult, weaken, downgrade or simply even be negative about Islam or they will get locked up or unalived. How could you ever trust anything they say?
Both of them were in ascendancy and are the ideologies most directly responsible for the modern Egypt, Syria and Iraq. If they were the best hope, that is very sad to hear.
@electricVGC , The Arabs suffer from the CIA coups, blockades, wars, occupations, and proxy wars we imposed on them. It took us over 60 years to destroy Ba'athism. That is a testament to its legitimacy.
So much for "Arab unity." I don't know about other arab nations, but I was never taught any of this. We only ever hear about the war in Yemen, but never the details, and especially not the rivalries behind it. Everything is America this, America that. And I get they're to blame for a lot of thing along with the colonial states, but fucking hell did Arab rulers plunge the entire region to the depth of fucking hell for power, control and influence. There was never Arab unity to begin with. Just a bunch of people "uniting" by killing the previous rulers and going on a conquest to claim the rest of the lands. It's a shame and a disgrace for everyone living today the humility that was brought about by their greed that was further reinforced by ignorant populations.. everyone today is paying the price for what they have done.
I am a Yemeni, and I love all my Arab brothers, but I don't think it is right to unite like that, we have a lot of diffirent things that set us aside, diffirent religions, tribes, history, culture, ideologies, and even language, we have a lot of dialects, a lot of non-Arabs that live with us and within our own countries, I feel it is good that way, or maybe some countries can unite, the ones that are so close to eachother in everything, maybe Oman and Yemen, Saudi and UAE, Syria and Lebanon, Somalia and Djibouti, but other than those unifications, it is not right to unite all of us together like that.
u r arab by any chance
if so then from where
i wanna ask u some stuff
firstly do u belive someone like husni mubarak to be a dictator
or al jolani
secondly did ur region have a war and did u live through any war
arab unity was a lie it never was an actual option because of the people leading it arabs now are good as is if they unity like how the gulf has by not uniting as one nation but uniting in economy and bothership, groups like the baath party have ruined arab countries more than helping iraq and syria are the greatest examples but without baath in syria look at how fast they are begining to progress
@@Proud_Hadrami I'm Canadian. There were alot of native dialects not spoken much anymore. There's also the french ..
Just ask yourself, who would Arab unity affect the most?
please put dates on the screen a bit more often, thanks :)
good content m8
”why are there so dictators in the Middle East?” idk good question m8…
Islam? 😂😂😂
Islam.
Rejection of other things as the corner stone in the belief system and tribal nature of the populace.
So everyone has their slightly different view that leads to rejection and nepotism and the need to cement your position.
The only solution is to rebel and replace - but if you hold the same concepts, your alternative is just a different shade of the same.
Why is water wet why are chimps so violent
YOU ARE BEING LIBERATED, PLEASE DO NOT RESIST
just a small correction, the protests that called for nasser's comeback are largely seen in egypt as being staged by nasser himself from before his resignation, and that he didnt seriously consider resigning, and there are pointers to it being suspect in the course of events. I wish you painted it more as a controversial matter rather than as a fact of public support (nasser was in fact, as unpopular as he was popular)
Bro he never thought of leaving power any second, he knew he got his ass wipped and humiliated by the Israelis so he had to do another play like he always do
Solid video. Learned a lot. Fascinating with all the infighting, backstabbing or personal pride that went into decisions that impacted so many.
2:31 thats because he was half Kurdish.
5:47 the CIA literally gave Saddam a list of people they didn't like and he wiped them all out.
8:13 he was wrong and was just asking the french for power. Muslims and alawites such as Sheikh Saleh Ali fought alonside eachother against the french. So he is wrong.
10:12 that was ironic coming from nasser who was very anti religious. He imprisoned islamic scholars and mocked the headscarf.
11:33 that is an understatement. The army of assad literally flattened the entire city with no remorse for civilians.
16:23 he was one of the mostly tyrannical kings in yemeni history. Him and his dynasty claimed to be descended from the prophet and used their lineage to justify their hereditary rule. The houthis are doing the same thing now in yemen. They have documents that say they have the divine right to rule over yemen.
21:30 I disagree. Faisal rejected pan arabism and had a pan islamic outlook.
22:48 Yes, in the case of Yemen it is indeed a bit more complicated. The Shias in Yemen are Zaydis, and their beleifs are more similar to sunnis then the mainstream shias. Secterianism only truly began in Yemen in 2004, when badreddin al houthi converted from Zaydi Shiism to the Iranian Jafari Shiism.
26:13 This region (eastern Yemen ans Western Oman) is an ancient region known as Hadhramaut.
52:25 I disgaree with his statement because it is extreme and implies that raising children is not of any value.
✅✅✅✅
Great analysis and relaxing music, happy new year Jabzy.
when i heard the music i was like: "wait a sec, this is from the game Suzerain" which makes it 10 times better, and the fact that the artstile looks somewhat near the game art, and Suzerain is a game about story and hard politics makes it all the better.
Wow, things are so complicated. Thank you for clearing this all up.
Love the amazing content, keep it up!
After u finish Middle east can u do a series on History of South East Asia. Not Many People Know the History of that Region
Just a small note: Resolution 242 is deliberately ambiguous regarding the "Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied," in the 6 day war. It is noted by those who worked to write on it that it was intentionally left vague as to be subject to interpretation regarding how much Israel would be required to vacate.
"I have been asked over and over again to clarify, modify or improve the wording, but I do not intend to do that. The phrasing of the Resolution was very carefully worked out, and it was a difficult and complicated exercise to get it accepted by the UN Security Council. I formulated the Security Council Resolution. Before we submitted it to the Council, we showed it to Arab leaders. The proposal said 'Israel will withdraw from territories that were occupied', and not from 'the' territories, which means that Israel will not withdraw from all the territories." -- Foreign Secretary of the UK George Brown
"That means that you can’t justify holding onto territory merely because you conquered it. We could have said: well, you go back to the 1967 line. But I know the 1967 line, and it’s a rotten line. You couldn’t have a worse line for a permanent international boundary. It’s where the troops happened to be on a certain night in 1948. It’s got no relation to the needs of the situation.
Had we said that you must go back to the 1967 line, which would have resulted if we had specified a retreat from all the occupied territories, we would have been wrong. In New York, what did we know about Tayyibe and Qalqilya? If we had attempted in New York to draw a new line, we would have been rather vague. So what we stated was the principle that you couldn’t hold territory because you conquered it, therefore there must be a withdrawal to - let’s read the words carefully - 'secure and recognized boundaries.'" -- Lord Caradon
Please can you make a video of Africa during the cold war
UN Resolution 242 doesn't require Israel to withdraw from all territories. It merely required Israel to withdraw from "territories" so as to leave wiggle room in negotiations.
Yeah because Israel earned its territory by right. You want Israel to just give away its land for no reason?
@@PrimetimeX yeah by murdering, looting and displacement
19:15 the claim that abdualziz said about slaves as beast what’s the source for that?
Can find it here: “His Original Name Is . . .” - Remapping the Slave Experience in Saudi Arabia. Alaine S. Hutson.
Make video about Islam and Christianity in Indonesia please. As an Indonesian, Islam didn't really come with trade like most of popular historians believe especially to what happened with my ethnic groups, an indigenous ethnic group in the middle of North Sumatran jungles and Bukit Barisan mountain range near the largest vulcanic lake in the world. In 1539, Acehnese Sultanate invaded my ancestors's land when one of our king refused Islam. Aceh faced difficulties during the war then they bought & hired Ottoman weapons & mercenaries to invade us, our people freaked out then asked Portugal to help 'em to stop the invasion of Aceh and Ottoman Empire. In the 1810s during Padri War, an Islamic civil war in Minangkabau, Padri soldiers heard a cannibalistic pagan tribes in the middle of North Sumatra who remained as pagans, the Padris sent envoys to our kingdom to demand our people to leave our paganistic religion and became Muslims but got rejected. After the rejection, Padri soldiers invaded our kingdom and massacred 200.000 people and arrested our king, when he refused Islam, they executed our king for not accepting Islam, they brutally ransacked our villages/cities & massacred my ethnic groups who refused their religion. They were failed to conquer us when a cholera outbreak happened thanks to dead bodies that leaked cholera. After they failed to conquer us, our ancestors were devastated after watching our ransacked kingdoms and dead relatives even cholera outbreak happened and severely decimated our population. My ancestors became hostile towards outsiders/foreigners. Years later, a couple of US Baptist missionarists came and introduced Christianity. Too bad, the locals thought they were another hostile foreigners/outsiders and they caught & ate them. Before Christianity came, my people were pagans who had cannibalistic culture/rituals. My ancestors conducted cannibalism towards people who did terrible crimes such as rape, murder, or treason. A defendant was brought in front of judge, if the judge found the defendant conducted heinous crimes, he/she would be tied on an altar then a shaman who was also executioner would recited some mantras and slashed the defendant's body before beheading him/her and being eaten by people. POWs were also eaten back then. Before Christianity, my ancestors believed if we ate people, it'd grant us magical strength. We also did child sacrifice ritual by sacrificing li'l boys to gain black magic. Besides cannibalism and child sacrifice, my ancestors were known as jewellery makers and weavers. A German missionarist came and introduced Christianity among my people. He built schools, hospitals, etc. But a lot of kingdom citizens hated him coz Christianity could destroy our culture and religion such as our cannibalistic rituals. There're some reports that some people tried to assassinate him to stop Christianity from destroying our old faiths and culture but failed. Cannibalism and child sacrifice were eventually banned when Dutch colonial regime imposed anti cannibalism law towards us after annexing us in the 1907. If Christianity never came, perhaps my people would still do capital punishment in form of cannibalism and child sacrifice. Unlike other Indonesian regions which were colonized for 350 years, we only got conquered in 1907 when Dutch soldiers succesfully assassinated our priest king. Dutch faced difficulties at fighting a cannibalistic nation in the middle of Sumatran jungles near the largest lake in Indonesia
iirc Islam started to get prominent when one ruler of Indonesia needed military support from the Ottomon empire and so vowed to turn Islam into state religion in exchange or something like thag
Ur backwards people got conquered, big deal! Cry about it.
Ah...yes bataknese people who claim they are one of the lost israel tribes
@@scarymonster5541 yes as a batak, I remember being in Jerusalem when the romans came, terrible times.
Is this satire?
Starting the new year, with a bang Jabzy. I can't wait, for you to do an in depth analysis of Africa.
A two-semester graduate level course on the Middle East in just under an hour. Wow.
Great analysis and relaxing music
great video and series, could you make the next (or some future) series about argentina. ever since its new president came into power it jas become a more and more talked about nation and i would love to have its history presented with your in depth style
Jabzy will this series end with the year 2025?
i wish there's subtitles for this video. All the names confuses me 😵💫😵💫😵💫
Someone please help me with the name of the King and the exact quote @19:00 please
Ibn Saud and you can find the quote in this paper. "His Original Name Is . . .” - Remapping the Slave Experience in Saudi Arabia." Alaine S. Hutson.
Hope the next series is on British history. Would be a cool series
Britain before Caesar
24:05 the egyptians didn't even use chimecal weapons against Izzy settlements on their own land during the two wars for its liberation even though they had Scud missiles and helical weapon factories. So, No, I wouldn't buy the Islamist monarchic slaver kings propaganda that they did so to yemenis in the war to liberate them from said slaver kings
19:48 spends a few minutes explaining how the slaver kings were kidnapping pilgrims and enslaving them; then right away calling reporting that at the time as propaganda
Propaganda doesn't always mean lies.
Interesting nuance. Opportunistically revealing a true for very selfish and biased motives with intentions that might not be in the interests of the people you are reporting on?
The Soviet Union probably spun a particular angle on the Nazis in an effort to influence Eastern Europe to fall more in its sphere of influence.
"Nazis are bad" can be true but the reporting may not be full of integrity if it tries to convince people "therefore join the Soviet Union that's a great idea"
"People we hate are doin somethin bad we think you should let us be in charge of everything forever"
Most likely the only way we ever hear about any wrongdoing is actually through propaganda that we should be cautious of trusting too much. That's just how media always works, even researched information.
You are likely attempting to report honestly but you have very little way of knowing how much the KGB the CCP MI6 and the CIA can truly influence the sources you are forced to rely on.
In fact propaganda manipulations about history and reporting may even be morally justified or even necessary if distorting the truth of the record from the public's knowledge is through some convoluted sequence some absolutely necessary part of preventing open nuclear war.
Few other justifications could excuse conspiracy and corruption on the scale of incessant global microwars, but preventing large scale nuclear war, it would be justifiable to taint all the records here and there in little ways that civilian academics without Top Secret clearances and oaths would find difficult to penetrate.
And I respect you as being of exceptional quality among any like us who are limited to work with what is declassified. Since you are not in trouble you are not accessing any secrets.
What that means however is that you are unfairly handicapped and unable to report or research on what is most of interest. Since you like not being in military prison, lol.
But you collect and collate and summarize the declassified stuff extremely conveniently for amateur students and hobbyists giving us a marginal fighting chance to have a semblance of understanding the context of our surroundings.
It is no failing on the academic reporter's part if they don't have Top Secret clearance from over a dozen nations across a myriad maze of opposing factions. Just means anyone can extrapolate there's just a limit on what we can actually know. What anyone knows is only what is official public statements that, let us be honest, is the version intended for the enemy to read. In all cases.
Anything told to a true actual ally is, of course, secured.
Often it's useful to tell the enemy the truth, but you'd still only do that to manipulate them.
@darthparallax5207 dude u ok ? XD
Remember your “What the Axis Powers Wanted” video? You could make a similar one but about the “Axis of Evil” (Russia, Iran, China), talking about Iran’s Cold War in the Middle East, Russia’s desires in Eastern Europe, and extreme nationalist chinese wanting to annex Siberia and the Himalayas. So basically, what the Axis states wanted, but a modern version.
Well Russia seems to want reclaim places that Russian speakers in them ( that’s why they invaded Ukraine) while china desires Taiwan and the South China Sea idk what Iran wants though
i would definitely watch this
Iran wants to make middle east shia extremists, Russia wants nato bases out of ukraine(although NATO did this because Putin was making Ukraine pro russian... something like Georgia nowadays) and china? China said to US to leave Taiwan alone as it is a "part" of china but america was like How dare lowly iranians have a say? How dare chinese have an opinion? How dare russians want something? To be fair if we said OK to US, we would have become as weak as souther americas so at that point it was either being weak or being an enemy... and weak lmao
Because of me i did that
Stop it please
I can't believe you
@@neptune3569 nuh uh
@@Karma.3636pretty pretty please stop? 🙏🥺
Why did you do it?
Great video.
Who is the guy depicted in the portrait that comes up when Jabzy mentions the Syrian communist party? He comes up multiple times but I didn't clock a name anywhere
Any book recommendations for someone interested in beggining to learn about the history of the modern Middle East?
29:51 I want to clarify here that the region of touat with its various villages and even the city of Bechar were under control and protection of the Algerian nation under Emir Abdelkader 1830-1846 and were under control of the Regency of Algiers since 1554-1830. Only when the central power in Algiers had fallen did Morocco try laying claims to these regions, which is considered an invasion of a foreign state
What is this background music? Its so relaxing. Whats the of this "Song"?
Nevada City by Huma-Huma
Why are there so many bots?
Who is to say my channel isn't popular with the ladies?
@JabzyJoe XD, Yea, but all these accounts were created 1-2 hours ago so sadly they are bots
Dead internet, read up
I love how we're basically at video 22/10 now. 😂
I'm up to 30 in terms of writing.
Let's be honest. If Italy and the UK had never intervened in north Africa and Arabia, or the Greeks never had threatened the Turks at 1919-1922, Arabs WOULD still be part of the Ottoman Caliphate. Tribalism and the inconceivable factionalism that dominates the vast majority of Arabs means that a state is run by purely personal interests. This leaves them vulnerable to foreign intervention. So dictators, with foreign aid and the back up from some disgrunted army officers, can rule over millions with relatively ease.
You could say the same about any society without strong institutions; china, half of africa, all of south america, and many others
There is absolutely no way in any conceivable timeline that deviated past the 1890’s that the Ottaman Caliphate would have been allowed to continue to exist. Regardless of WW1 every other power in Europe was determined to break it up.
As Arab i agree no one wanted to leave Ottoman empire
@@nouhowlmao2809the difference is that you can read the history of their beginning the Ottoman Empire didn't enter middle east with war our ancestors is who asked the help Ottoman empire to protect them from the west Crusaders this why you see the west is angry when they see Turkeya is try involve or just help Arab country the west is afraid the Ottoman Empire will come back as if the west ever cared about us 😒 we all wish we never leaved Ottoman empire but we can't say it outloud
Blaming all problems on tribalism is simplistic, Egypt for example is not tribalistic but still suffers from authoritarianism and religious extremism.
I don't want to be this guy but Alois is pronounced as its spelled as its a German name, I served with a guy from the same village as Brunner in the Austrian Army
Depends on what you mean as a dictatorship, because most, and I mean most of these dictatorships actually functioned. For example Gaddafist Libya worked out successfully for those 42 years, Saddam, well we all had disputes but under him Iraq was greater then g es today. Syrian bathaist parties need to go. I’m being honest, they need to go. For the Iraqi coup, the Arab unity wasn’t gonna happen. Not in a million years. But, the monarchy in Arab countries is a FAT L if I’m being honest. Sudan, there trying their best to hold onto themselves and as much land as possible. Kinda feel bad for Sudan ngl.
Honest question, why did you single out syria there but claim irak and libya were fine before? What exactly did Syria do wrong that the other two did not?
Why is monarchy a "fat L"? Only the monarchies seemed to have actually survived and stabilized while the Gaddafi, Saddam, Assad, etc. all collapsed.
Maybe if muslims wanted peace with Israel, all would be good
@PrimetimeX monarchy's don't do anything special they are just permanent american puppet states or are lucky enough to be far away of Israel desired lands to actually afford being a real state like Oman
@41:47: That is not a Nazi symbol, it's drawn the wrong way.
Woooooow Syria's guy is gone!!!!!!!!!! Thank you Jabzy for shedding light on Syria's early republics which will become highly important as people should rediscover Syria's sophisticated political past
Bro think israel gana be fraind with syria
@@Smokryliowhy not ? After all Syrians don't want more wars they already got enough of it, and we Arabs or foreigners shouldnt demand from them to enter to another war for Palestine, give the dudes a break they have been suffering for 13 years ffs
@@AyariAymen-q9f bro has never spoken seen or even interacted with syrian in there life. Yes syrians are pro Palestinian Israel is currently invading Syria syrians don't like to get invaded and have there Arab brothers be massacred
@Smokrylio I didn't say that my guy, it's just one of these moments where history and current events colide and I think it's understandible to be excited for it.
@@AyariAymen-q9fyou do realize israel is attacking them anyways
What's "nuculer" mean?
Does anyone know if these tribal problems exist in the Turkic or Persian world?
Tribal i dont think so but dictator problem yes it was given by soviets
yes!
For the Turks and Tajiks, the tribalism isn’t as bad but the Russians came and fucked everything up instead. See the Tajik civil war.
A blood bath across history, we Arabs always serving the world always fighting each other, united or not
Fighting among themselevs or fighting againsf others you guys dont want peace
You Arabs need to stop being antisemitic and stop fighting Jewish people
History of the Indian Sub Continent would be a really good one to do another mega history of, if you want to
Instability in the Middle East is clearly a feature, not a bug😕 Even if westerners never came there or modern Israel didn't come to be, the region would still be unstable due to their geography and especially their culture.
If it wasn't for Israel Egypt, Jordan and Syria would've fought over Palestine with eachother
@typiclyjohny5114 exactly. Heck, considering how these countries ended up fighting/expelling Palestinians despite "Arab solidarity", you are right.
@@orboakin8074 Its also crazy how many "Pan Arabists" just ended up using this as a front for their tribal politics
Yeah it’s the unfortunate reality, dictators no matter what are always gonna go into wars I guess the best thing for us is to hope for a day to come where peace happens
@@DreadRobbyhuh
Jabzy, For the life of you reply to the this comment because I want to understand your mindset behind doing this. Is this a case study you're doing behind the middle east? You know TH-cam is a big world right? You're just circling around events in the middle east and you're not addressing the real causes with questions like this title and even for this video like you didn't mention how Nasser centralised power in Egypt in the hands of the army who literally run the country or how Algeria is also run by the military and the religious infighting of each country and you're just mentioning wars and who backed them from institute research studies but you're not mentioning anything from the current causes and of course these videos aren't bringing much of a revenue with these low view counts in return for your editing and voiceover so why? What's the reason behind this 24 videos series and the "series" idea when you could do some really nice videos on recent topics with irl footage? You have plummeted your channel's visibility from the history side of TH-cam after the history of China video and now you're talking about a region that doesn't even watch English TH-cam that much and nobody cares about because you know... endless fighting. You know these videos aren't going to be revisited again because they lack many things so why? Jabzy gives the hint of Jaber but your channel's handle includes Joe in it so I might get it if you're of middle eastern origins but if you're not then this is useless because the people from this region that I was doomed to be born in has to listen to this in arabic not English to learn something but I guess you're free to do what you want with your life and I'm just saying spend it wisely bro.
shallow and void of any promised answer as a vacuum is void of air.
As an Egyptian I hated Gamal Abdel Nasser He was a stupid dictator who lost Sinai and entered wars that exhausted Egypt in the name of failed Arab nationalism
Great analysis, thank you! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
A region of the world to pay close attention in the decades going forward.
Dictator is just the word used for illegitimate monarchies. If you observe medieval European history, all kings were also 'dictators'. This pattern is not special nor exclusive to the middle east.
My take on the question: The Arab republics will continue to go from coup to coup and from dictatorship to dictatorship is because of the fact that the best paying jobs in these so-called republics is being the president of these republics. The best paying job in Egypt is being the president of Egypt. The best paying job in Iraq is being the president of Iraq. Same with Libya, Syria, Algeria, Tunisia and Yemen. You can’t make serious money in those countries unless you’re in power because they all share one thing in common; unproductive and undeversified economies. That is it to say, they make most of their money through one or two channels, typically tourism and/or natural resources with everything else lagging behind or making up a very small portion of the pie. These are feudal/rent economies i.e you don’t make money by making things to sell them off rather you make money by collecting rent to allow use of your assets and how do you collect rent? By being the landlord (president). Unless you’re born into a very wealthy family your surest way to become wealthy is to be in or around power. If you notice that each and every president over the last 70 years or so in the so called Arab republics all come from humble beginnings. And they typically go into the military or secret service. They’re all ambitious men that didn’t have the opportunity to financially better themselves through other means. Compare and contrast with the west; the best paying job in the US isn’t being the president of the US. The best paying job in France isn’t being the president of France. Same with the UK, Spain, Germany, Portugal and all the OECD countries. You’re better off starting a business and putting your energy into competing in the free market and leaving politics to those who actually have an interest in it. The president of an Arab republic is effectively an economic role not a political one.
Please keep ur Western democracy, Arabs are better off without democracy
Qasim was never really aligned with the Iraqi Communist Party as he refused to share power with them, never legalised the party and jailed its members.
My source is _Red Star Over Iraq, Iraqi Communism before Saddam_ (2011) by Johan Franzen
Ba'ath deos not exactly mean renaissance. more like resurrection.
Bye Bye Assad
Man the Soviet Union really poisoned the decolonization of both Africa and the Middle East with their arms sales, training of officers in their ideology and other similar actions.
the US did exactly the same
@wolfneumann9675 This is a ludicrous comment. Civil wars even today in Africa and the Middle East are equipped by Soviet/Russian gear, from the AK-47s to the T-55s and RPG-7s.
@@ThePhiphler…buuuuut they also use American equipment. M16s are found from Peru to papua. America was more into the “regime change” thing during the Cold War rather than arms sales but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen
@@malegria9641 Magnitude matters. If the typical African civil war can accurately be described as a series of AK-47 battles, going "what about M16?" is not valid analysis.
I recommend watching “The conflict based on a lie” by GDF. It says a lot about what the Israeli and American officials during the 1967 war were saying. It’s quite revealing.
Yeah love their content covering the ME.
GDF is cool but he shouldnt suck up to Gaddafi
gdf is a clueless propagandist like most americans talking about foreign policy
gdf is a clueless tankie
GDF is good but he’s such a tankie sometimes that I just can’t put up with it sometimes
34:10 Mauritania......One of the last places on earth where slavery is still nationally and culturally practiced😕
19:00 least racist Saudi
0:26 indian farmer image
Don’t forget, we also have a dictator in the UK too now
Charles, or the other guy who has no authority, won an election, and probably won't even last to lose the next one?
I think he means Connor McGregor 😂
Add dates and stats , then I’ll subscribe
Short answer:it's the British's fault
you must otherwise ask the question why it is the region where it is teeming with American bases in all the Gulf countries with dictatorial monarchies but protected because they are totally submissive. and the rest other Arab regimes that you categorize as "wicked and dictatorial" with your arrogant Western standards that ignore the specificity of these peoples ... are in reality the only ones who refuse to collaborate who are not conciliatory with American policy so you decide with criminal cynicism to bring them down either by an invasion as happened in Iraq or by interference by fomenting civil wars and supporting terrorist groups often Islamist as a legitimate interlocutor as an alternative to the wicked pan-Arab regime that you do not like
Or you could ask why Baathists in Iraq and Syria hated each other. Or why Syrians quickly rose up aganist Nasser. Or why the Egyptians and Saudis funded proxy wars in Northern Yemen. Or why the Communists in Southern Yemen would shoot each other in the Politburo. Or why in the Lebanese Civil War Shia fought Shia, Christian fought Christian, Druze fought Druze and they all fought each other. Or why the Egyptians and Libyans fought one another. Or why Syria, Iran and Iraq all funded Kurdish rebels in the other nations. Or why the PUK and KDP fought one another. Or why Saddam only promoted people from within his own tribe. Or why Alawites persecuted people in Syria. Or why Islamist groups constantly rise up in North African Nations. Or why Morocco and Algeria fought. Or why Algeria funded rebels in Western Sahara. Or why Libya funded rebels in Sudan, including, South Sudan. Or why Jordan ousted the PLO. Or why the PLO would fight Hamas. Or why the Iraqi invaded Kuwait............ but I suppose, we can just say America for all that?
Hi
Sex
I'm already pretty bad with names..
Tusken raiders are just violent
Why did america vote for a fuhrer?
19:06 LOL
*§īM₽ŁƏ !¡!*
*Ə×ṬŘƐMƏŁ¥ §īM₽ŁƐ !!*
*Easily explained, and fully comprehendable aftet hearing one 3 letter acronym for an organization, combined with* :
🇺🇲👌🌎🗺🌐🏛🗽🤘🇺🇲 *-!¡! ṬÆM ÆMƏŘīČ̣Å - ₩ØŘŁĐ ₽ØŁīČ̣ə !¡!-* 🇺🇲🤘🗽🏛🌐🗺🌎👌🇺🇸
🎼🇺🇲🎼👌🎼🗽🎼🌐🎼🤘🎼🇺🇲🎼 *Americaaa~ "F" Yeah ! Americaaa~ "F." YEAH !!!* 🎼🇺🇲🤘🎼🌐🎼🗽🎼👌🎼🇺🇲🎼
Someone should mod this into hoi4
Because of the fundamental structure of Islamic culture in general and Arab tribal culture in particular. It will never change. Ever.
Are you dumb? Its always the same with these idiots. “ItS iSlAm” at everything that happens in the middle east.
You know what, fine. Explain how the “fundamental structure of islamic culture” causes these dictators? Even when everything they do goes against islam, and ironically the worst ones were secularists.
Why would we change? Yes I am a tribal Muslim Yemeni and am proud of it.
Tf you mean never ? not all a Arab countries are tribal my country Tunisia has not tribalism in it and 99% of the people are Tunisian first
pure bigotry.
??? Are you on meth or something??? In some of the most tribal places in the Arab world (e.g. Algeria, Saudi Arabia) there isn’t any violence. In the Algerian civil war of the 90s, it wasn’t on tribal lines, and the Tuareg tribal areas of the south saw peace during a war so bloody it’s now called “the black decade”.
Iraq’s Qassem flag looks neat lol. I like the sun.
disliked for misinformation.. its disgusting..
That type of government works for them
a new threat - the indigenous people :O
Maybe because its the work of Mossad? what a silly video
Why is jerbzy still making content on ME history? He neither speaks nor reads the language, and is only able to cite second hand NSA/Crown approved resources.This task ought be left to qualified individuals, not alt-right-z. Abd El-Nasser was the bane of britannia/colonialism, he's the only man Robert McNamara wrote a whole book about.
By that logic he can't cover any history except modern English speaking nations. Can't even cover the medivial age in England because he doesn't speak old/middle English.
cry about it
I wouldnt trust Islamic historians with writing an accurate grocery list. Everything and anything they write down is propaganda that can’t insult, weaken, downgrade or simply even be negative about Islam or they will get locked up or unalived. How could you ever trust anything they say?
Ba'athism and Nassirism were the best hope for a modern Arab world.
Both of them were in ascendancy and are the ideologies most directly responsible for the modern Egypt, Syria and Iraq. If they were the best hope, that is very sad to hear.
No, as an Arab they weren’t. They’re all terrible ideologies Baathism’s hope was oppression and so was nasserism
@electricVGC , The Arabs suffer from the CIA coups, blockades, wars, occupations, and proxy wars we imposed on them.
It took us over 60 years to destroy Ba'athism. That is a testament to its legitimacy.
Ask to USA
Lol the usa only got their hand very late in the game
This video is laughably biased. The bias either is coming from the creator or the sources they relied on. Almost cartoonishly so.
Okey Ibrahim 😂
Begins with socialists and answers the question right there. 😒
Tell me your American without telling me your American.
The West is no better, both sides are at fault
Answer: Britain and France
What a shit show 😢