From Prince Harry to the Queen: Special interview with 'The New Royals' author | Palace Confidential

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
  • From Prince Harry to the Queen: 'The New Royals' author Katie Nicholl Palace Confidential interview. Despite the uncertainty over the content of Prince Harry’s forthcoming memoirs, King Charles is determined to reconcile with his younger son, according to a leading royal author and broadcaster. Speaking on our royal talk show Palace Confidential, Katie Nicholl says that the issue is a priority for the monarch for a number of reasons. ‘The rift at the heart of the royal family is no secret, we see no signs of a real, long-term reconciliation, although I’m told that it’s very much on the King’s agenda,’ she says. ‘He knows that a royal family has to be a united royal family. That’s important for him on a person level and it’s important for him as the king. And I think we saw evidence of that with those olive branches that were extended to Harry and Meghan [recently].”
    0:00 Palace Confidential Katie Nicholl introduction
    0:38 How tumultuous is the period now for the Royal Family, after the Queen's death?
    3:19 How are King Charles and Queen Consort Camilla reacting to the change of pace?
    4:34 Royal duties vs sorting Prince Harry 'rift': What is King Charles III's priority now?
    6:00 What will happen with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children's titles?
    7:23 What do Harry and Meghan ACTUALLY think about the Royal titles?
    9:36 'Hands-on': Katie Nicholl discusses what King Charles was like as a father
    11:39 'George knows his father will one day be king': Prince William's destiny and his family dynamic
    12:58 What roles will Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis have when they grow up?
    14:22 Will King Charles do a 'Queen of Denmark'?
    15:20 What future does Prince Andrew have in the Royal Family?
    16:04 Is it destiny to have tension between 'The heir and the spare'?
    17:24 Will there be friction between King Charles and Prince William?
    18:42 Are there times when Queen Consort Camilla 'calls the shots'?
    20:40 Katie Nicholl reveals the 'BBC blunder' reason we don't know more about the Queen!
    22:05 Katie Nicholl discusses what she learnt about the Queen from her cousins
    23:00 What did the Queen really think about Megxit?
    24:37 What did the Queen think about Prince George's upbringing
    25:42 What did the Queen think about Kate Middleton as Queen Catherine?
    26:32 When will the era of 'Never complain, never explain' come to an end?
    27:30 The most fascinating thing Kate Nicholl discovered during her research
    #palaceconfidential #KingCharles #PrinceHarry #PrinceWilliam #KateMiddleton #KatieNicholl #DailyMailRoyals #MeghanMarkle #Queen #QueenElizabeth
    You can buy 'The New Royals' here: fave.co/3SF1ApK

ความคิดเห็น • 952

  • @DailyMailRoyals
    @DailyMailRoyals  ปีที่แล้ว +56

    What did you think of the interview? Don't forget to buy Katie Nicholl's book right here: fave.co/3SF1ApK

    • @shicks3543
      @shicks3543 ปีที่แล้ว +118

      Katie biased towards Harkles. She also needed to leave Prince George out of it

    • @carolround4156
      @carolround4156 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      Will never buy the book.

    • @elizabetha.morris6661
      @elizabetha.morris6661 ปีที่แล้ว +106

      I refuse to watch this interview, and to buy Katie Nicholl’s book. Her exploitation of Prince George - a child, has brought a barrage of attacks on him and the Royal Family. Disgraceful.

    • @kittyatroyal1565
      @kittyatroyal1565 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      What a cheek iving a link to buy her book!

    • @Shucking_The_Jive
      @Shucking_The_Jive ปีที่แล้ว +83

      You’ve got some nerve leaving a link to buy this horrible writer’s book. Will not watch this interview and will not support this book. Becoming quite close to not supporting the Daily Mail either!

  • @nanciebee
    @nanciebee ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Comments made about Prince George means I shall NOT buy this book!

  • @flee3490
    @flee3490 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Waiting for an APOLOGY from Nicholl re bullying Prince George

    • @carmenmoore3834
      @carmenmoore3834 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      All you'll get from her is more excuses blah blah blah!!!

  • @annbernadettemayer8985
    @annbernadettemayer8985 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Very upset about her comment on little George. Children should NOT be monitized!

  • @Kari_B61ex
    @Kari_B61ex ปีที่แล้ว +266

    My one reason for NOT buying or regarding her book is that she wrote about Prince George, a nine-year-old child. In my opinion, this was disgusting.

    • @karenzielke9387
      @karenzielke9387 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      And apparently it didn't happen!

    • @Ldeb54
      @Ldeb54 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I will wait to see how it is really written. The media is good at making something out of nothing.😊

    • @Mmmmmmm988
      @Mmmmmmm988 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@karenzielke9387 wait, so you're saying that a royal biographer lied!!😮
      but.. but I thought "anonymous sources" are always legit. Well, at least when it comes to Harry and Meghan
      But If she made this up, I wonder what else she lied about in her little book 😂

    • @ruthdianneschoch5583
      @ruthdianneschoch5583 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      My reason, too. She said she’s she was using her sense of humor. Does she have children? Mine would not like to know any such story had been told about them. And the story isn’t true. It has changed my entire opinion about her. Bad judgement on her part, and thoughtless.

    • @ruthdianneschoch5583
      @ruthdianneschoch5583 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agree.

  • @elizabetha.morris6661
    @elizabetha.morris6661 ปีที่แล้ว +198

    I refuse to watch this interview, and to buy Katie Nicholl’s book. Her exploitation of Prince George - a child, has resulted in a barrage of attacks on him and the Royal Family. Disgraceful, and per comments/reports, also you for not questioning Ms. Nicholls on that.

  • @us5634
    @us5634 ปีที่แล้ว +218

    Shame on her for writing what she did about Prince George. Where are her receipts for this....there aren't any!!

    • @wildseifen
      @wildseifen 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Correct.
      Also... she turned in a typical gossip grifter.
      From a very near source...
      And... I also dont like haters. Equal to Kate and William ir Harry and Meghan. We need more human talk... understanding... Not another Sensation.
      Kind regards

  • @KateWoodehouse
    @KateWoodehouse ปีที่แล้ว +637

    Based on the fact that she reported a private item about little George (and its likely that it didn't even happen) and exposed this child publicly, I can't buy this book in good conscience. She should have left the children alone. She exposed a little boy to public ridicule to make money. Awful !

    • @kittyatroyal1565
      @kittyatroyal1565 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      Where did she get this information? Did she grill his classmates?

    • @Mmmmmmm988
      @Mmmmmmm988 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Wait, so your saying that she's lying...
      But I thought "anonymous sources" are always legit. Well, at least when it comes to Harry and Meghan.

    • @sandie157
      @sandie157 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@Mmmmmmm988 😄😄😄😄 Well said

    • @KateWoodehouse
      @KateWoodehouse ปีที่แล้ว +128

      @@Mmmmmmm988 You know, I don't think it matters if this is true or not, this kind of 'reporting' on children shouldn't happen. Kids have to be given room to be kids and learn and grow.

    • @neliegiwu5975
      @neliegiwu5975 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      I agree

  • @lucretia3606
    @lucretia3606 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    The elephant in the room is Megan is a narcissist. She can’t help herself and will never change. There will always be drama.

    • @nr4013
      @nr4013 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And blatant lies.

  • @lizbadras862
    @lizbadras862 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    So sad to see Ms Nichols take a swipe at Prince George. She should publicly apologize.

    • @jamescraig703
      @jamescraig703 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      She did apologize.

    • @elizabetha.morris6661
      @elizabetha.morris6661 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@jamescraig703 When and where/how did she apologize? I can’t find it. Despite, Katie Nicholls well knew Meghan Markle supporters would attack Prince George as they have. Despicable.

    • @jamescraig703
      @jamescraig703 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@elizabetha.morris6661 There were several questions to Ms. Nicholl about her comment and her apology was reported. You can't seriously say she knew in advance Markle supporters would take advantage. I saw the apology.

    • @elizabetha.morris6661
      @elizabetha.morris6661 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamescraig703 Really?! Megan Markle’s supporters on social media have been viciously attacking Prince William, Princess Katherine, 7 year old Princess Charlotte, and King Charles for over a year, and which is well known by reporters/journalists who have reported on such. It is an easy call to know a “tidbit” about Prince George would result in a barrage of vile attacks, precisely as has happened, including wishing for his death. I still have yet to find any apology from Ms. Nicholls - I’m uncertain which source you have found. Notwithstanding, Ms. Nicholls used poor judgement or didn’t exercise any at all, and the damage is now done.

    • @lindaross4331
      @lindaross4331 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@jamescraig703 It was no apology. All she did was try to justify her remark by throwing William under the bus as well. Have you seen the death threat the child received? The one with photo of the gun and the guy saying he knows what to do?

  • @uchierico
    @uchierico ปีที่แล้ว +42

    👎 to Katie Nicholl

    • @lulug4283
      @lulug4283 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've read so many comments pretty much saying same thing and more negative things. Can I ask why? Thanks

  • @donnachipchase6358
    @donnachipchase6358 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Leave children alone 😡

  • @beverlicoetzee4832
    @beverlicoetzee4832 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    This interview convinced me I do not need to read this narrative. Miss Nicol shame on you for bullying a little boy.

    • @danielleN101
      @danielleN101 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quoting what someone said, even if they are a minor, is not bullying. The response others are having might be, but that's on them. The quote was hardly a big deal.

    • @mariazuko4879
      @mariazuko4879 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh geez, George is not going to buy and read this book. Get a grip people

  • @spiritofanu3112
    @spiritofanu3112 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Will not be buying her book. I used to be a fan of Katie Nicholl and her coverage of the RF. Not anymore. The Palace has denied her claims of little George saying what she claims. Anyone that exploits children as clickbait to sell books is not of interest to me. Why was she not asked to explain her actions on this show? That was a big disappointment.

    • @KateWoodehouse
      @KateWoodehouse ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Even if he had said it, and it's very likely he did not, she should NEVER have exposed a child like this to public ridicule. Leave the children alone!

    • @spiritofanu3112
      @spiritofanu3112 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@bones642 seems this interviewer wanted to protect her - wondering why?

  • @marynelson3634
    @marynelson3634 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Wow, Harry's kids deserve protection, but George is fair game? Hypocrite!

  • @KeilaBrazis
    @KeilaBrazis ปีที่แล้ว +130

    I'm so disappionted you are promoting her book and you didn't even asked her about what she said about Prince George. I'm just shaking my head...

    • @wills2408
      @wills2408 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Agree. Why promote her book?

    • @lillvill6403
      @lillvill6403 ปีที่แล้ว

      you want her to promote H or M books?

  • @martinamccosker9603
    @martinamccosker9603 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I won't buy her book of fiction, besmirching a nine year old boy is out of order, I'll stick with Mr Bower, Angela Levin and Valentine Lowe.

  • @katiecanuk2951
    @katiecanuk2951 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    Katie is irrelevant now, after bullying George, minor child. Shame on Jo for not questioning Katie.

    • @danielleN101
      @danielleN101 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      What Katie did isn't bullying. It's called slander.

    • @vilma3502
      @vilma3502 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Agree 💯%

    • @nicolettacinci3053
      @nicolettacinci3053 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

    • @shebacs
      @shebacs ปีที่แล้ว

      George is a child so what Nicholl did is child abuse.

    • @Kezia.G
      @Kezia.G ปีที่แล้ว

      Wait, what happened?

  • @denisehicks6683
    @denisehicks6683 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I wouldn't buy her book out of principle, she always bats on the Markle's team. As for what she said about Prince George......shame on her

  • @shicks3543
    @shicks3543 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    I will not buy the book. Has she read all the terrible things that have been posted about Prince George since she wrote the lie about him? Shame on her

  • @LunaAmico
    @LunaAmico ปีที่แล้ว +32

    After lying about 9-year-old Prince George to sell her book I refuse to buy it.

  • @pilarblanco8554
    @pilarblanco8554 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I won't be buying your book....bullying George!!!...shame.

  • @pennylouise3454
    @pennylouise3454 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Gosh that's a loud carpet!
    Why did you not quizz that author on why she stirred the pot for throwing a 9yr old under th bus by adding in that he said what every child does: be careful, my dad or my mum is a fireman, policeman, lawyer, strong, tall, has big muscles .... whatever.
    A malicious little add to her silly book.
    She should also take a breath at some point - verbal diahorrea

  • @Little_But_Fierce_NZ
    @Little_But_Fierce_NZ ปีที่แล้ว +160

    Harry is not “owed” anything

    • @danielleN101
      @danielleN101 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you believe in this monarchy shit than technically he is, shows how dumb the whole idea is.

    • @nythabm814
      @nythabm814 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Agreed Harry owed NOTHING, the tittle belongs to the crown and the Monarch have the possibility to give or take away.

    • @annedoyle222
      @annedoyle222 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      He’s owed a big foot right up his backside

  • @lisaa8795
    @lisaa8795 ปีที่แล้ว +249

    Jo, you made a mistake here by not holding Katie's feet to the fire about Prince George. I hope she was only guilty of misjudgment of the times - that the times are now different since she attributed a very similar quote to William many years ago. But if she is reusing the quote William made, shame on her, she should be sanctioned for that. That should have been touched on, because the Prince George quote has raised such a firestorm. I won't be buying her book.

    • @valerielawrence8795
      @valerielawrence8795 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Me to south africa

    • @christinenorton2510
      @christinenorton2510 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Me to for the same reason.

    • @amma7244
      @amma7244 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Me for the same reason

    • @danielleN101
      @danielleN101 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A firestorm? Total exaggeration.

    • @elizabetha.morris6661
      @elizabetha.morris6661 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielleN101 Here you go again. You need do the requisite research before questioning others. Social media, notably Meghan Markle’s supporters, have been attacking Prince George (and the Royal Family), including posting vile threats to his life. We are not talking a few people, but, many thousands either posting or agreeing with the vile attacks.

  • @irenebarlow8865
    @irenebarlow8865 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I won’t be buying this book. I don’t believe George said what Katie said he said. If he did it shouldn’t have been reported.

    • @agamnwuese3646
      @agamnwuese3646 ปีที่แล้ว

      My granddaughter always telling me she will report me to her father and mother so if he even said as an innocent child This woman is pro Sussexes I pray she has children who will thrash her If King Charles has years plan in place then he cannot be changing it now He will just go ahead and implement the plan and we have seen that in his speech and actions God save the King 👑🙏💯

  • @elizabethmusto5349
    @elizabethmusto5349 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    My opinion of your show has plummeted with this interview of Katie Nicholl. Really, how could you stoop this low? First, the Prince George fiasco and now apparently she thinks Harry's children are owed titles?? I think not. Btw, nice pic of you cozying up to Harvey Weinstein, Katie.

    • @caroldonaldson5936
      @caroldonaldson5936 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Clearly rather smitten wasn't she!🤮🤮🤮

    • @decorDD
      @decorDD ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To be fair , there is barely a single celebrity or journalist who wasn't photographed with Weinstein ..

  • @jayneartwickis
    @jayneartwickis ปีที่แล้ว +15

    You did a disservice to a little boy, you should not have brought him into your book. So horrid

  • @MonteenMcCord
    @MonteenMcCord ปีที่แล้ว +50

    AND...you ignored the 800 pound gorilla in the room by not addressing the alleged comment from Prince George "just wait til my daddy's king" which was denied by the palace. Cite your source, Katie and let's get it sorted once and for all.

  • @hongkongerin5685
    @hongkongerin5685 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    I will give this episode a miss because of Katie Nicholl.

    • @caroldonaldson5936
      @caroldonaldson5936 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Me too!👍 Absolute traitor!😡

    • @pattimctigue9680
      @pattimctigue9680 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I used to like her, but I really haven’t too keen on her lately. She seems to lean to H&M and then the comments about George really made me not like her.

  • @taratitat2615
    @taratitat2615 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    This book includes on bullying of a child, Prince George. Can't support this kind of works.

  • @suzannegill9233
    @suzannegill9233 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Sorry Jo, love Palace Confidential. Katie Nicholl is the lowest of journalism. Cannot Watch This.

  • @kammy1432
    @kammy1432 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Sorry I will not be watching this interview. She has put Prince George in danger by the stuff that she’s posted on Twitter and in her book enough is enough

  • @sczyba
    @sczyba ปีที่แล้ว +171

    Why would King Charles give a royal title to a child (Lilibet Diana) who was born to an American mother (who said titles meant nothing to her) and who lives in the USA where titles are not recognized? I can understand why Charles is hesitating....

    • @shicks3543
      @shicks3543 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      What about the suspicious circumstances of their births / parentage and possibly not being born of the body?

    • @annrhodes3544
      @annrhodes3544 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@sczyba If you click on the three dots in the side of your comment, you will be able to edit it.

    • @sczyba
      @sczyba ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@annrhodes3544 Thank you!😊

    • @KateWoodehouse
      @KateWoodehouse ปีที่แล้ว +26

      They're being raised as Americans in America. So, what use will titles be there, expect of make money off of, I guess? Also, H&M have both talked about how damaging the whole set up is and how people get 'trapped by it'. So why would they even want it for their kids?

    • @E20Launderette
      @E20Launderette ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LOL, well, all of Queen Victoria's children were born to a German father. And actually, Victoria was German too, come tithing of it. If you want to go there, Harry is more English than Charles is.

  • @mayamae55
    @mayamae55 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I cannot bear to listen to Katie Nicole after she shamed a nine year old boy in a book. Besides, unless Katie obtained the information from an adult who actually witnessed George saying such things, it’s TOTALLY HEARSAY. Kids easily twist stories and tell it to parents.

  • @kittyatroyal1565
    @kittyatroyal1565 ปีที่แล้ว +288

    He is not entitled he betrayed the family.. However much Ms Nichol says he is.

    • @lj50
      @lj50 ปีที่แล้ว

      These so called royal experts are out of touch with reality.

    • @heathercreighton9613
      @heathercreighton9613 ปีที่แล้ว

      Katie is a Ginger and Nutmeg fanatic.

    • @blacksling9
      @blacksling9 ปีที่แล้ว

      He did not betray anyone, he left to protect his firm from your horrible press and those on the firm who leaked lies!

    • @shychameleon
      @shychameleon ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blacksling9 Henry and his wife have been taken pot shots at the RF since they left. They want money for their royalty which is the opposite of what the royals are all about. Tired of hearing their complaining.

    • @heathercreighton9613
      @heathercreighton9613 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blacksling9 bullshit.

  • @karenbrannaman114
    @karenbrannaman114 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    I agree with most of the other comments here about PH and MM titles for them and their children. No titles and strip the ones they have. They have made it perfectly clear they didn't want anything to do with the monarchy. And I can't believe that Katy Nichols just said the titles are owed to them! I was interested in buying this book, but after hearing this... no for me, well that and the thing about Prince George......

  • @arievena19744
    @arievena19744 ปีที่แล้ว +213

    Unethical to "interview" children w/o parents knowledge or consent.... Or, worse, teachers gossiping about their students.

    • @jamescraig703
      @jamescraig703 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Who interviewed children w/o parents' knowledge or consent? I doubt a teacher disclosed the comment; probably came from a parent of one of his schoolmates.

    • @lindalanteigne8909
      @lindalanteigne8909 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      So it’s just hear say. Not very reliable.

    • @jackiemartin9737
      @jackiemartin9737 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      So many books published about the royals recently and maybe Ms Nicholls needed to draw attention to hers. Shame on her that she had to use a small vulnerable child to try to propel her book to the forefront with an apocryphal tale. No amount of a clipped upper crust accent nor personal presentation can make her look decent.

  • @laura-jeandawe3731
    @laura-jeandawe3731 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    I've bought all of Katie's other books, but this one, I just can't. Anyone with half a brain knows just how vile the "squaddies" are and she, knowing that, subjected George to ridicule with this one and to me, well, that crossed a line... Sorry, eh, but it's about my own principals. and I will not buy this book...

    • @rosethorne9076
      @rosethorne9076 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Katie has always struck me as a 'sugar'. I won't be buying her book either.

    • @lindaross4331
      @lindaross4331 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was vile what the SS wrote . Anyone with a brain knew they would. Even a photo of a gun and a death threat to a child. ..and Harry and his wife, say nothing to their 'fans'. I guess they wouldn't, as it's said they pay most of them.

  • @HuntClubBarbie
    @HuntClubBarbie ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Never fails to surprise me what a biased advocate Nicholls is for the Montesito monsters! Canceled my 20 year subscription to VF as a result. Her obvious subjectivity made me question VF"s integrity and journalistic objectivity. Very disappointed.

    • @bernadetteann1176
      @bernadetteann1176 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is very disappointing!! I totally agree with you.

  • @donnabarnes540
    @donnabarnes540 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Oh just strip them of all titles. It’s nothing to do with race it’s to do with slimming down and their unsavoury behaviour !

  • @stardust4987
    @stardust4987 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    He needs to make decisions as a King not a father.

  • @elizabethm888
    @elizabethm888 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I despise Harry and Harry's wife, but I would NEVER say anything about their children.
    So disappointed in Katie Nicolls

  • @VickyfrenchFrench
    @VickyfrenchFrench ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Not personally liking Katy Nicols. Sorry, just my opinion.

  • @elizabethm888
    @elizabethm888 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Harry and Harry's wife are no longer part of the Royal Family.
    They live in a different country. They have tried to monetize the BRF.
    Queen Margarethe's grandson Nikolai made a commercial that focused on his title. I saw it. That May have something to do with why the titles were removed at this time.
    Charles should do the same. They are abusing the privilege. It is an entitlement, not a "right".

  • @KateWoodehouse
    @KateWoodehouse ปีที่แล้ว +404

    Its the titles that are "owed to" Harry and his children? says this woman? Um, no its at the pleasure and decision of the current King. The 'owed to' is based on what George V thought about 100 years ago. Charles III can change it if he thinks that's what makes sense. And this 'owed to" attitude is what is at the heart of the problem with Harry, I think. Harry is absorbed with what he thinks he should have that he doesn't, instead of counting his considerable blessings.

    • @elizabethm888
      @elizabethm888 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Well said!!

    • @missannettep6796
      @missannettep6796 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      I did not watch Nicholls. You say she said titles are owed to Harry and his children. Harry owes royal duties called work to Sussex and the UK, he is the one who owes something. Actual work, royal duties, he and his wife. Why keep a title of a duchy they do not represent? The nerve.

    • @Anon.5216
      @Anon.5216 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Harry just wanted to forge his own way in life and he has every right to do so. The UK people can't stand that he refuses to be the stooge of the media. He wants his own life. Good for him.

    • @catheydunn6518
      @catheydunn6518 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@missannettep6796 I won't watch this either and I like this typically. The RF owe Harry and his wife nothing and the children were never going to be titled no matter who Harry married. Plus Nichols is plugging the book she exploited PG in and she caused him to be the focus of twitter attacks and then acted like it was not her fault.

    • @sc3942
      @sc3942 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@Anon.5216 Forging his own way by denigrating his family and accusing his countrymen/women and his family of being 'racist' ... please ! If he'd stop 'merching' his title and royal connections to forge his own way of life, others might have a bit of respect for him. He's just a hapless fool, who's aligned himself to a very calculating wife and her agenda, in my opinion.

  • @aquarius5461
    @aquarius5461 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Let H and M go into the sunset with the biggest love story of all time, See how much money they can make from this ! Without grifting from royalty,

  • @carolh.3602
    @carolh.3602 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    The children's titles are wanted for monetary purposes and bragging rights on their American mother's part, IMO. What a shame.

    • @anitaflores9336
      @anitaflores9336 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In my opinion, they want the titles mainly to secure security protection for all four of them.

    • @dianad1968
      @dianad1968 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anitaflores9336 Wouldn't they children have to get the HRH to warrant the security? From what I understand just Prince and Princess is not going to do it, and Charles had better pay close attention to what the citizens of the UK feel and say.

    • @anitaflores9336
      @anitaflores9336 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dianad1968 I do like that King Charles hasn't made a rash decision. Let them hanging waiting for results. And I truly hope the King does not grant the titles.

    • @anitaflores9336
      @anitaflores9336 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dianad1968 in your opinion what does the majority of UK citizens wish.

    • @flyonthewall8122
      @flyonthewall8122 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It isn't only about security. It's about IPP status which would give them blanket immunity from just about every indiscretion imaginable...from extortion & blackmail to parking tickets.

  • @ak203
    @ak203 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    It is inconceivable that Meghan can shut up. And for that reason, Charles cannot get the trust he wishes. He would be much better off stripping all titles and letting them be in the wilds but unaffiliated with the royal monarchy.

    • @shychameleon
      @shychameleon ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So agree.

    • @lincliff663
      @lincliff663 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I agree, Alex. As H&M don't live in the UK & people from the RF no longer have contact with them they are soon going to run out of stories & they have no friends in the UK to feed them.The last interaction was when the Queen died and they were barely included. What on earth can they offer next - they have nothing. As for the titles, I think Charles is biding his time but knows he has to be King first & father second in these matters.

    • @wills2408
      @wills2408 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Both will NEVER shut up.
      No titles for both children unless they become working royals when they become adults

    • @cactusrose9601
      @cactusrose9601 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Add Harry to that scenario

  • @annfisher3316
    @annfisher3316 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Ms Nicholls it is disappointing that you relayed the "brat" story about a young boy, who probably has more on his shoulders than you, or l ever will.

  • @jencl3863
    @jencl3863 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    I think it is unfortunate that the author has decided that a child’s tale to their parent about another student should be included, without thought to the consequences. I’ve seen firsthand how a child can suddenly come up with a made up story about another child when a parent asks “did xxx do anything to yyy?” It’s so disappointing that this was included in the book.

    • @desres2281
      @desres2281 ปีที่แล้ว

      She's a big fat SUGAR, don't buy her book! 👍👍

  • @clairelariviere3122
    @clairelariviere3122 ปีที่แล้ว +386

    I think that Harry and Meghan have already demonstrated that they don’t respect the titles and, even when they give assurances that they won’t undermine the monarchy, they do the complete opposite. They don’t hold up their end of the bargain and, in my opinion, will continue to disappoint if given the opportunity.

    • @shicks3543
      @shicks3543 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Given the fact that the Harkles have ALREADY copywrited and trademarked Princess Lillibet and Prince Archie….. don’t you think that is proof of their wanting to commercialize and merch the titles?

    • @Sonyag1
      @Sonyag1 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Exactly. Harry, led by Meghan, has shown that when you give them something nice, they live to throw it back in your face. A 30 million dollar wedding and Meghan turns around and calls that family that gave you such a nice wedding "racist".

    • @spiritofanu3112
      @spiritofanu3112 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Agree - they cannot be trusted and King Charles does so at his own peril

    • @katdag2490
      @katdag2490 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      So true!
      Harry and his wife are waiting for the titles to keep destroying the English monarchy!

    • @clairelariviere3122
      @clairelariviere3122 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@katdag2490 I agrée. All evidence from their behaviour points to their selfishness and disloyalty

  • @kittyatroyal1565
    @kittyatroyal1565 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Has she come in to back peddle on her treatment of Prince George. She comes across as not liking the Royal family.

    • @mabirch118
      @mabirch118 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      She likes the odious exiled duo of Montecito.

  • @christinelegate8137
    @christinelegate8137 ปีที่แล้ว +183

    How can KC give titles to children who do not reside in the UK and there is no proof regarding their birth circumstances.

    • @SarahM906
      @SarahM906 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Exactly.

    • @hensmom6473
      @hensmom6473 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Absolutely 💯💯🙌

    • @lynw.6140
      @lynw.6140 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not only that but what work do they do for Great Britain for the use of those titles. Zip..

  • @shicks3543
    @shicks3543 ปีที่แล้ว +168

    Those titles are NOT owed to children who have many questions regarding their birth and meeting the criteria of born of the body. Many Americans know more about the requirements than British Katie N

    • @shicks3543
      @shicks3543 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      And……
      Given the fact that the Harkles have ALREADY copywrited and trademarked Princess Lillibet and Prince Archie….. don’t you think that is proof of their wanting to commercialize , abuse and merch the titles?

    • @danielleN101
      @danielleN101 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As an American I have to strongly disagree. Most Americans don't give a shit about this stuff, let alone know the requirements of titles.

    • @clareroberts4980
      @clareroberts4980 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Harry is not entitled,he's way down the list As for titles for the children of a yacht girl,I don't think so;;

  • @kittyatroyal1565
    @kittyatroyal1565 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I'm waiting for Jo to ask about the remark she made about George. And where she got her information. Or is she getting special treatment?

    • @doxasophosmoros
      @doxasophosmoros ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because they are friends. Katie is obviously paid off by the Sussex team now, though.. Harry n Meghan are getting people on side and paying people off in the royal rotation who they know we like... I think , unfortunately that Robert Jobson is also one of them... But the money they pay is good.. it explains Katie Nicholls easily being swayed (she slept with a drunken Harry about 15 years ago, not kidding .. it came up in some documentary she was on in around 2007)

  • @deniseloper3182
    @deniseloper3182 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I find it abhorrent that she used George in her book. He's just a child, leave off the children

  • @crystal2484
    @crystal2484 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I have never given this segment a thumbs down. She is the reason for the first ever from me.

  • @christinenightingale336
    @christinenightingale336 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    What connection does Katie Nichols have Harvey Weinstein? and is this the same lady who made a comment in her book about little Prince George in her book,surprised really as he is a child,not keen on this person.🇬🇧

    • @lincliff663
      @lincliff663 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Christine, she was probably at the same event as him one time (years ago) & had the misfortune of having her picture taken with him before the scandal unfolded. Now people are putting the picture out there because she foolishly misspoke about George in her book. The probability is that she didn't know him at all & never met him again.

    • @hairiwish
      @hairiwish ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lincliff663 o well... a taste of her own medicine then about how things can be taken out of context. Not sure how playground talk between 8/ 9 year olds made it into a book. It didn't need to be in there.

    • @shicks3543
      @shicks3543 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lincliff663 you are also making assumptions that she didn’t know him

    • @lincliff663
      @lincliff663 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hairiwishI agree. She shouldn't have written about George at all nor made flippant excuses afterwards instead of apologising for her mistake. It's arrogant.

    • @lincliff663
      @lincliff663 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shicks3543 No I'm not. I used the word 'probably' - not 'definitely'. She may have known him - after all hundreds of people did. Why bring a picture of that creep into a story about Prince George. It's low & irrelevant.

  • @stelladowsett7151
    @stelladowsett7151 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What is the point in Archie and Lili having titles? They live in America where titles aren’t recognised.

  • @mjbalmmac1588
    @mjbalmmac1588 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Charles needs to follow Denmark. You can’t have titles without obligation and duty. Titles should only be for direct heirs not all grandchildren of monarch. Makes no sense to have titles for anyone that is not servicing monarch. All titles are at discretion of monarch. Can be given and changed to keep with times. Makes sense for Charles to update letters of patent

    • @patryan1375
      @patryan1375 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @JBALM Mac
      He doesn't need to follow Denmark. HMTQ and Charles made declarations about a slimmed down monarchy years ago. Since then many European royal houses have followed suit, with Denmark being the latest to do this. In the UK we have the vote going through parliament. We were the first to suggest it but we need a vote in parliament as opposed to a decision by the head of state alone. Those countries are small, with small populations. We have 54 commonwealth countries to consider with 2.4*billion population.

  • @blossomct
    @blossomct ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Not buying a book from a bully and katie there is the biggest bully and needs to be arrested ....

  • @Chryslers1
    @Chryslers1 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    Losing the Queen was like we've all just lost our mother.. & I'm from a Commonwealth Country. I can get use to King Charles lll, I'm hoping that everything flows just like it did when his mother was here. I wish him the very best 👑

    • @donnabarnes540
      @donnabarnes540 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It will do 😊

    • @fionamackenzie6068
      @fionamackenzie6068 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I do hope so. I am also from the Commonwealth. Let’s not destabilise this institution

    • @BlackStump172
      @BlackStump172 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fionamackenzie6068 It will be up to Charles whether he destabilises the institution. He needs to stay completely out of politics including no private political communications with politicians and diplomats . William needs to start backing off too as his blatant support for the Climate Change Con is totally political. Harry can do what he likes as he is not a working Royal .

    • @janbroderick8230
      @janbroderick8230 ปีที่แล้ว

      L

  • @abicat6158
    @abicat6158 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    It was disgraceful to use Prince George, a minor, for this ‘author’s own monetary gain. I would neither buy her book nor will I watch this video of such a person. A public apology should be tendered immediately & removal from any royal media events should be her reward

  • @susanyork5089
    @susanyork5089 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Utter disgrace dragging Prince George into the mix , how dare she

  • @clairemullin9679
    @clairemullin9679 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    The King is also obligated to listen to what the public wants and Harry and Megan definitely should be included in private family events if the rest of the family can trust them but for the public face no way are they wanted by the public. Keep them away from us. No way back for them. Who could look up to such a trashy pair?

  • @paulacarli1181
    @paulacarli1181 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Won't watch this interview, she disrespected the royals with statement about Prince George.

  • @Myautoimmunelife
    @Myautoimmunelife ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I was going to purchase the book, until I heard about Prince George being but in it. In my opinion children should be left alone.

  • @shalinitolani8480
    @shalinitolani8480 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    FYI. I am not even going to watch this interview because it is so disappointing that not only have this reporter on the show but touting the sale of her book. She has shown a total lack of ethics by writing comments about Prince George, a young child!!

  • @cward1603
    @cward1603 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I love the show, however, I am not sure I would display "The Bench" in the background.

  • @helenjackson1666
    @helenjackson1666 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Harry and Meghan for me have caused to much hurt and damage , how he hurt his Grandparents he is selfish and feels he is entitled , i can not trust them and shouldnt be Royals ,Charles is a very busy man and hasnt time with Harrys petulant behaviour

    • @clareroberts4980
      @clareroberts4980 ปีที่แล้ว

      Harry wanted out he said he was trapped and caged so his wife the d-actress and yacht girl took him off to the USA she hated the UK 🇬🇧 but how mattress Meg loved that title and how she used it to make millions, the title should be removed and no titles for their children, they are not working royals and they live in a foreign country and meme has stated she wasn't interested in titles;;.so no titles easy-peasy

  • @heatherboo1
    @heatherboo1 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Being a prince or princess “in America” does NOT “carry more weight” here. British channels keep forgetting that we do not have this kind of thing, and we don’t grow up swooning over it. It does NOT have meaning to us. I incidentally met royalty once and I could not even summon any awe of difference even though I was trying. So even if Archie wants addressed as Prince Archie here…. Good luck with that 🤷🏻‍♀️

    • @ladyprudence6
      @ladyprudence6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I think we like to meet royalty just so we can show them a deliberate lack of deference. Btw, "princess" is often used pejoratively here.

    • @paulcarter4945
      @paulcarter4945 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      correct - but they will merch off it - just a fact

    • @hensmom6473
      @hensmom6473 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And want us to pay their security costs! 😡

    • @justaname8313
      @justaname8313 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Exactly MEgain needs to realize Britain has it's Monarchy and US it's Constitution. Respect to both. She needed to decide what she preferred. Too late now.

    • @dariaramolino7426
      @dariaramolino7426 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Finally! Someone should have said this looooong time ago -the things as they are

  • @emilygooner9697
    @emilygooner9697 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I can’t see how the boys will make up bc harry is never going to apologise, how can you make up with someone if they don’t say sorry ? 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • @monicadobre5032
    @monicadobre5032 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    The children need to be seen by everybody, family and British people, before any title. In the UK. And a DNA test would be quite useful. A king does not give royal titles to kids that he has never seen.

    • @shychameleon
      @shychameleon ปีที่แล้ว

      Also sworn statements by the delivering physicians they were 'born of the body'.

  • @JessieCori
    @JessieCori ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Just remember only recently meghaliar's the cut interview....and you want to tell us her kids are owed titles?! She did everything to mistrust her.

  • @sharonwelsh8907
    @sharonwelsh8907 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Omg Katie Nicholls knows absolutely nothing and see's things that are so different from what she is trying to profess. Andrew hasn't hung on the coat tails of being the "Spare". He served in the Royal Navy and did actually fight during a war and put his life on the line for the country and his fellow servicemen. H went to Afghanistan and spent more time in the bunker than he did anything else. He is the one that is hanging on the coat tails of the Monarchy and has done nothing of value since. Yes he was one of the many people that set up Invictus after it being copied from the Warrior games in the US. Everything else he has "achieved" has gone down the drain since he took his sulk and left. If H and his wife were to be brought back into the family the republic would win to end the Monarchy, after H&M's behaviour since leaving, and all their interviews (straight from their mouthes) not the media as their culties like to blame. Charles is listening to the country and commonwealth as many have made their feelings crystal clear and do not want them back as working/part time Royals.

  • @pememepee
    @pememepee ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Used to like her but now... Close to Weinstein dodgy connection , puts me off of her plus the comment about young George.she out now

  • @alannasandell2300
    @alannasandell2300 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    King Charles made it clear in his first speech - he is a traditionalist 🤔

    • @dianad1968
      @dianad1968 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i hope you are right, and that he doesn't give into Harry and his wife's manipulations. Strip the titles, and let the chips fall where they may. How much worse can the Toxic Duo do?

    • @ritavermeulen2307
      @ritavermeulen2307 ปีที่แล้ว

      And a whimp

  • @mirabellnsofor5219
    @mirabellnsofor5219 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Why did she sensationalise n report the account about Prince George and his playground banter. All in a bid to appear relevant and in the know!? One wonders at her motives...the book rates 0. Shameful!!

  • @morgandonnally2333
    @morgandonnally2333 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I preordered the book but have cancelled the order. No one deserves a title--it should be earned. The children of Harry and Meghan are being raised in the US and we do not have titles in the US. The Sussex need to be stripped or called the Dumbartons!!

  • @mariaclarawartenweilerruiz3196
    @mariaclarawartenweilerruiz3196 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    She has to say sorry . You used George to sell your book. She thinks she has all the answers.

  • @sherylvalentiner6115
    @sherylvalentiner6115 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This woman is not impressive in the least. Won’t be buying her book because she, to try and be cute or relevant, told a lie about a young boy, making him fodder for all manner of social media trolls. It was NASTY. Not interested in supporting that behavior.

  • @CK-wc8ow
    @CK-wc8ow ปีที่แล้ว +6

    she lost all credibility in my eyes once she wrote about Prince George. If her book was about highlighting the Queen, she should have stuck to that..

  • @mabirch118
    @mabirch118 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I turned off the sound for this interview while reading the comments.

  • @terimcgehee1673
    @terimcgehee1673 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So this is the woman that wrote about prince George? I'm finish watching this episode.

  • @leannef9558
    @leannef9558 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Actually the titles Prince and Princess of the 2 children would bear ZERO weight here in the states....makes absolutely no difference here whatsoever. We aren't a monarchy and these people make most of us laugh behind their backs at their ridiculous behavior over here! :D

  • @teresaarnould1732
    @teresaarnould1732 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I completely agree with these comments regarding Prince George. These children are being asked to be in the public eye in very adult situations and judged for their behavior. They are handling it beautifully. It is a treat to see them. The flip side of this should be that the press leave them alone and especially don’t dare spread rumors of them or things they “allegedly” say. Their will be consequences! I won’t be buying anything she publishes. She has no scruples.

  • @lora9664
    @lora9664 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Plus this lady is not anymore of a Royal expert than I am. 😅

  • @moniquechapman3001
    @moniquechapman3001 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    No respect for her talking about Prince George

  • @billiederham8398
    @billiederham8398 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Excellent interview, as always, by Jo. I wish, though, you would remove that book that is visible on the left , The Bench. Put it out of sight!

  • @debbiehall7016
    @debbiehall7016 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ..they thought they had a couple years?! The Queen was 96 years old!!!

  • @franmellor9843
    @franmellor9843 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Oh dear!! I'm OUT

  • @ladyprudence6
    @ladyprudence6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    There should be a new rule: you must live in the UK to inherit or use a title.

  • @thelimey351
    @thelimey351 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    If King Charles folds like a pack of cards to Me-gain & Harry Markle’s manipulation with the titles for their children then I will give up on him…😕

  • @ronica4803
    @ronica4803 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Can't bring myself to watch all of this!

  • @dotwillcoxson5352
    @dotwillcoxson5352 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Sorry, didn’t finish watching. The ‘interview’ was just a promo for the book.

  • @anabertaoehlers2563
    @anabertaoehlers2563 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Sorry Jo but bringing innocent Prince George into a discussion he can’t even defend does not reflect well

  • @donnachipchase6358
    @donnachipchase6358 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I was surprised too see her in pictures.with Harvey W...

  • @belindalockart9513
    @belindalockart9513 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Ms Nichole’s needs to hush! I really don’t like her especially the more she talks too!

  • @SueProv
    @SueProv ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Nice job of keeping a young child out of the news meaning Prince George.

    • @Lostcamp
      @Lostcamp ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The parents themselve put the children in the public eye in a very controlled way. It is fair play to report on the children in that way. The "agreement" with the media relates to unwanted photos of the kids while going about their daily lives. There are very few of those photos. Like it or not George is newsworthy and the parents know that. That is why the published photos of the children are released by the parents themselves

    • @silverlining1613
      @silverlining1613 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Lostcamp you must not have children or perhaps its just a heart you are missing. Fair play? Seriously?

    • @carolround4156
      @carolround4156 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Lostcamp have you seen all the hate from the markle sugars because of what she wrote about Prince George? The were all kinds of death threats and vile comments made.

    • @caroldonaldson5936
      @caroldonaldson5936 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lostcamp what part of betraying the privacy of a nine year old child seems 'fair' to you? Who do you think the 'source' of that information was because it certainly wasn't the school! Either Nicholls trawls the gutter for her 'sources' or, more likely, it's a figment of her imagination to sell a very dull book in a market currently awash with an embarrassment of riches produced by excellent, credible authors of integrity & authority who don't require to tell tales about young children in order to sell third rate trash.

    • @silverlining1613
      @silverlining1613 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Lostcamp i don't have anything against the video. I just don't care for people who think its ok to exploit children in the name of "fair play". Your words and THAT speaks volumes about you!