How many wkg is lost via the rubbing rotors? Harry ripped them to shreds on his 16 year old white out pen rim brake facebook marketplace home job! What a legend lol.
@@rotation-y2nit's a moot point either way the course didn't suit him, better for a bigger stronger rider. Small world tour pros wouldn't make the podium in that race.
Andrew Feather said his tyre pressure is 60 for wet surfaces, that could be why his numbers are strange. I think that's too low for his 23 or 25mm tyres.
I was just notified that I did less w/kg and I don't know what's going on, isn't that like factually impossible to win with less w/gk? Good video tho cheers man
Without having any aditional information about the race: its not impossible. Your tires could have a little less drag, or the line you took on the climb have a little more traction, there could be some slight wind difference, that + the difference between power meter readings, might have made a difference.
@harrymaccycling Potentially down to better aero at start of climb from you? Thereby getting you up to speed faster and holding a bit more speed for when it started ramping up more? Also better pacing from you, Feather really picked it up for the finish, but could've benefited more from using that power in the steepest middle section. I see you started in saddle at much higher cadence, then probably only got out saddle when started getting steep. Feather was probably out the saddle the whole ride, therfore a fair bit less aero with his very upright position.
Cmon Harry, of course it isn't impossible. So many variables are at play. A simple thing like traction and skidding can make an awful lot of difference to speed but not power, hence skewing times/power ratios. Also..where the power is applied...you will lose far more time if you don't hit the steep sections where the speeds are slower, even if you smash the flatter sections to even out the power average. Maffs init. Great ride either way. You ever tried the track? Surely you've got some good credentials to see what you could do there?
Aero still matters at slow speeds. I haven’t seen video, but seated vs standing is going to be marginally faster at the same w/kg. I believe Feather is an out of saddle climber. Either way, all that matters is that you crushed it.
How many wkg is lost via the rubbing rotors?
Harry ripped them to shreds on his 16 year old white out pen rim brake facebook marketplace home job! What a legend lol.
Thats a long way of saying you don't know how to adjust disc brakes lol
@@rotation-y2nit's a moot point either way the course didn't suit him, better for a bigger stronger rider. Small world tour pros wouldn't make the podium in that race.
Andrew Feather said his tyre pressure is 60 for wet surfaces, that could be why his numbers are strange. I think that's too low for his 23 or 25mm tyres.
If hes on tubeless, 60 is actually a good sweet spot for 25 given his system weight
@@esbdemesa9427tubeless on race day? hell no
Great video. Great analysis. Thanks
I was just notified that I did less w/kg and I don't know what's going on, isn't that like factually impossible to win with less w/gk?
Good video tho cheers man
Without having any aditional information about the race: its not impossible. Your tires could have a little less drag, or the line you took on the climb have a little more traction, there could be some slight wind difference, that + the difference between power meter readings, might have made a difference.
@harrymaccycling Potentially down to better aero at start of climb from you? Thereby getting you up to speed faster and holding a bit more speed for when it started ramping up more? Also better pacing from you, Feather really picked it up for the finish, but could've benefited more from using that power in the steepest middle section. I see you started in saddle at much higher cadence, then probably only got out saddle when started getting steep. Feather was probably out the saddle the whole ride, therfore a fair bit less aero with his very upright position.
Cmon Harry, of course it isn't impossible. So many variables are at play. A simple thing like traction and skidding can make an awful lot of difference to speed but not power, hence skewing times/power ratios. Also..where the power is applied...you will lose far more time if you don't hit the steep sections where the speeds are slower, even if you smash the flatter sections to even out the power average.
Maffs init.
Great ride either way. You ever tried the track? Surely you've got some good credentials to see what you could do there?
Nah not at all. W/KG gets more important the steeper the gradient. You put the watts down where it mattered the most. Congrats on the win.
Aero still matters at slow speeds. I haven’t seen video, but seated vs standing is going to be marginally faster at the same w/kg. I believe Feather is an out of saddle climber. Either way, all that matters is that you crushed it.
3:18 Interesting seeing the times for 7th, 8th and 9th
7. 3.24.7
8. 3.24.4
9. 3.24.6
Any idea what sorting algorithm they are using?
They're all online for God's sake.
@@Chris-xv2gm what on earth are you on about?
That watts per kilo doesn't include the bike right?
correct
I can do 9 W/Kg for about 15 seconds...