I wonder if each movement anaylzed by Kinetisense could be done averaged from 3 to 5 attempts, as I know I would probably wobble a bit on an initial lunge or two as my brain & body adjusts to the feedback from each movement. Even neck movements would also be affected as an initial stretch is rarely the deepest stretch. If Kinetisense measurement is done "cold" then I suspect that some erroneous measurements are likely. In many ways I think I prefer the manual range of motion and muscle testing, with adjustment over an expensive tech solution, which still requires therapy after Kinetisense has done its measurements.
Yea I get your point. The manual range of motion and muscle testing is just so subjective. I love the objectivity and the educational components of Kinetisense assessments. I find manual ROM and muscle testing don't paint the full picture for the patient to understand their shortcomings and impact their behavior going forward.
@@ScottHoar Thanks for replying Scott. I wonder if the "objectivity" is less perfect and more uneconomic if pursued with more statistical accuracy. Certainly the educational component is worth a great deal, especially for the finer points of rehabilitation - i.e. engagement/training of particular muscle bundles/groups. I like the principle of teaching people to help themselves (and others). We are all intrinsically connected to our own muscles, nerve fibres, digestive system, energy and filter systems, temperature regulation, etc.. - so we are complicated and interconnected - if we could more actively monitor more parameters ourselves we would be our own doctors, like Hippocrates reasoned.
Contact me if you have questions about kinetisense assessment or chiropractic care
Hello Dr Hoar ! When you’re next video will be released ? We really miss you !
Superb
Hello nice to see you back thanks have a nice day
Thanks, you too!
I wonder if each movement anaylzed by Kinetisense could be done averaged from 3 to 5 attempts, as I know I would probably wobble a bit on an initial lunge or two as my brain & body adjusts to the feedback from each movement. Even neck movements would also be affected as an initial stretch is rarely the deepest stretch. If Kinetisense measurement is done "cold" then I suspect that some erroneous measurements are likely. In many ways I think I prefer the manual range of motion and muscle testing, with adjustment over an expensive tech solution, which still requires therapy after Kinetisense has done its measurements.
Yea I get your point. The manual range of motion and muscle testing is just so subjective. I love the objectivity and the educational components of Kinetisense assessments. I find manual ROM and muscle testing don't paint the full picture for the patient to understand their shortcomings and impact their behavior going forward.
@@ScottHoar Thanks for replying Scott. I wonder if the "objectivity" is less perfect and more uneconomic if pursued with more statistical accuracy. Certainly the educational component is worth a great deal, especially for the finer points of rehabilitation - i.e. engagement/training of particular muscle bundles/groups. I like the principle of teaching people to help themselves (and others). We are all intrinsically connected to our own muscles, nerve fibres, digestive system, energy and filter systems, temperature regulation, etc.. - so we are complicated and interconnected - if we could more actively monitor more parameters ourselves we would be our own doctors, like Hippocrates reasoned.
@@djs5916 agreed. Whatever helps right?