I understand your skepticism, and I appreciate your perspective. However, I can assure you that my commitment to the integrity of sound quality is genuine and deeply rooted in years of research and experimentation. My designs, which may not be visually appealing, are deliberately crafted to optimize audio performance rather than to attract attention. It is highly unlikely that a scammer would choose to create products that look as unconventional and unrefined as these tweaks. Typically, scammers aim to create visually appealing items to capture interest and entice potential buyers, often opting for designs that look attractive, such as aesthetically pleasing orgonite pyramids. My focus on function over looks has led to a design that prioritizes sound quality above all else. This commitment to sound fidelity is not merely a marketing ploy; it reflects a long-standing philosophy of placing performance first. I have dedicated over 15 years to refining these tweaks, guided by the belief that true audio quality transcends visual aesthetics.
@@AudiophileRocks It takes courage to face criticism head on, so points for that. However, this is a none-answer. You didn't really address the criticism in any meaningful way. All you said is "hey, it's ugly so it must be real". That's kind of like saying "snake oil tastes awful, therefore it must be an effective medicine". Can you provide a clear and (preferably) simple explanation for HOW these products supposedly work? What physical processes supposedly happen when introducing them into a system? Anything that could be verified or tested by any other means except "trust me, it works"?
@@orenshamir The Termino can be tested with a high-end oscilloscope, and the rock can be tested with an EMF tester. Both of these devices show a measurable difference. These tests were not conducted by me, but by skeptics and customers. Even if I were to conduct the tests myself, people might dismiss them as fake. Therefore, I urge you to test it yourself and form your own opinion.
This is ssonewhat ridiculous. No, not the product. Hearing sonic differences.that are not as big as a mountain, requires so many things; the tester/listener's acuity & ability being the main thing. I modify equipment and if I didn't use the same recordings, I've listened to hundreds of times, I might not hear differences either. You need to play recordings you are so intimately familiar with, with equip. you are so familiar with, that if there is anything different about the sound, you will hear it, & notice it almost immediately, and pick up on it. You also have to know what things to listen for; some people that don't hear differences, do not even know what to listen for. Reviews should be done by experienced enough audiophiles that if they hear something cleaner or sweeter, or more transparent etc., they know it! This reminds me of cable doubters. Also it helps to listen to a variety of recordings you are as familiawr with as the back of your own hand with music from many genres;
@@sidesup8286 I agree; when I created the first crystal formula, I listened to the same 30-second song for five hours a day over the course of six months. Everything I listen to nowadays, I have heard hundreds of times, and I am very familiar with it. I use detail as my reference; if I hear something new from familiar albums, I know I am moving in the right direction. With my best tweaks, I discover a new world of detail in these familiar albums. When I add more tweaks to my system, it feels as though two music tracks are playing simultaneously, as they unlock a new layer of detail within the music.
This is why this channel is trustworthy, because Lachlan is open minded. There is often a lot of dismissal in the comments of trying these sorts of tweaks, I used to not believe sorbothane feet made a difference until I consistently heard it for myself, and learned not to dismiss anything as rubbish until I tried it personally. Takes guts to review products like this and do it with open mindedness and honesty.
Thanks Mark! I think it's important to try anything and everything with an open mind because there's still so much we don't understand. However, we also have to be equally as open to it not working as working. 🙂
I have a piece of concrete block sitting on top of my Eversolo streamer and audiophile switch box. Theory is the internal clocks are very sensitive to chassis vibration so the weight of the blocks may reduce chassis vibration. I don’t know if this tweak works but my system sounds really awesome.
I'd also drill at least 5x10mm holes in the sides of the case of the streamer to help the E-field energy balance within the unit as you can get standing waves generated by the clocks which run at 45.1584MHz and 49.152MHz. This unbalance can cause timing jitter and therefore temporal smear and a lack of detail in the high frequencies, caused by sub-harmonics of the two clock frequencies which manifest as a reduction of detail primarily in the higher octaves of brass instruments. It is subtle and due to the lock-in range of the oscillator digital filters being narrow due to the time constant of the PLL to provide long-term stability. When the holes are drilled, be sure to clean the particulates out of the enclosure with audiophile grade de-ionised water to re-establish the molecular bonds within the structure of the enclosure.
I totally get it, this works in the same way to those restaurants that provide an ipod, playing sounds of the ocean, while you eat your fish starter. It's revolutionary; able to elevate the humble sardine and make it taste like a million dollars (well, that was an exaggeration, but maybe $464...)
Thank you for an honest review, as it highlights that these tweaks are not suited for everyone. For the best sound, a cloth should not be placed under the rock, as it reduces the vibrations from entering the crystal formula inside. Furthermore, there is a slight delay after unplugging and re-plugging the Termino, as it operates similarly to a vacuum cleaner, requiring a moment to stabilize before reaching full functionality.
@@RocketLauncherwithInfiniteAmmo Yes, you are correct in thinking that crystals can affect magnetic fields, although the degree and nature of their influence depend on the specific properties of the crystals involved. Scientifically speaking, some crystals exhibit diamagnetic properties, where they slightly repel magnetic fields, while others are paramagnetic, meaning they weakly attract magnetic fields. Certain crystals, such as magnetite or hematite, can even display more pronounced magnetic behavior, interacting more significantly with magnetic fields due to their iron content. The effect of crystals on magnetic fields, while subtler than that of materials like iron or other ferromagnetic substances, can still be measured and observed. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where these materials are combined with magnetic elements, as the resulting interactions can shape the surrounding magnetic environment in unique ways. In my crystal formula, I take advantage of these properties by using a carefully selected combination of different crystals, each with its own magnetic and resonance characteristics. The formula I use is designed to work both with and against the magnetic fields generated by the audio system, creating a dynamic push-pull effect. Some crystals in the array may repel certain magnetic fields, while others attract them, which creates a balanced environment that helps to manage and optimize the resonances within the system. This balancing act is further enhanced by the presence of pure Swedish iron ore, which plays a vital role in focusing and stabilizing the magnetic interactions, without overwhelming the subtler effects of the crystals. What makes this system particularly complex and effective is the neutrality of the crystal formula. I avoid creating strong colorations in the sound, which can be the result of using a single type of crystal that overemphasizes certain frequencies. While these colorations can be easy to hear, they push the sound in one specific direction, often at the expense of tonal balance. My approach combines various types of crystals and magnetic materials to maintain neutrality, ensuring that the improvements in sound quality are genuine rather than a distortion caused by exaggerated frequency emphasis. In essence, the crystals in my formula do indeed affect magnetic fields, but the interaction is finely tuned. By blending different materials, I’ve created a system that enhances the audio performance while preserving the integrity of the original sound. The changes are subtle but profound, making the experience more natural, refined, and true to the source.
@@AudiophileRocks Well that raises another question, if they are finely tuned, how is it that the crystal knows where the field is being generated by the equipment, as in, would you not need a box made of the crystal to place the device inside? How by being placed nearby, does it affect the device if it doesn’t know the shape of the device or where the power supply is situated etc?
@@RocketLauncherwithInfiniteAmmo The rock significantly influences the magnetic field, and this can be easily measured using an EMF tester. The most substantial effect is observed on the transformer; placing the rock directly on it causes a dramatic spike in the electric field as detected by the EMF tester, whereas placing another metallic object shows no noticeable change. You can place the rock anywhere on top of the chassis, and it will influence the sound by affecting both the magnetic field and the resonances of the audio system, as the loose crystals convert some of the resonance into heat energy.
You have to have a very high resolving system your very familiar with, I use the Furutech clear line plug-in and they help tremendously but be advised to much of this kind of filtering can lead you to a overly sterile playback,they work using the same principles of crystal material for the disturbance in the magnetic fields for absorption
I don't doubt that a product like this could have an impact when connected to the component, but the Megaras Termino doesn't seem to have the right design to meaningfully impact the circuit.
Yes. I have an audiophile fuse in the Enleum AMP-23R. I can't recall the brand at the moment, but I shared a video about it as part of my "Tweak Week" series.
Please do more blind tests on the obvious stuff. Do like 20 runs on stuff like an apple dongle vs. a Burson with a Bifrost. Or something else. Just in spite of some of the people who still claim that there are 0 differences among all well-measuring units.
I've played around with sighted and blind tests a lot now and blind testing is less helpful to really understand the sound of a device because our brains still make stuff up during blind tests. The other consideration is that the people who are convinced that measurements are all that matters will always find a way to negate the findings of any testing that doesn't support their views.
I understand the fine, and i mean fine tuning of a system. I obsessed over a good system in my younger years when i had the opportunity. Speakers and their stands took a lot of adjustment to make them sing and sing they did. Most think your bonkers but the end result was with cherries on the top.
The more you fine-tune your own audio system, the more pronounced the differences become. It’s akin to becoming accustomed to a specific musical instrument or sports equipment; with time and practice, you learn to optimize it to perfection. However, if you constantly switch equipment, it becomes challenging to achieve that deep level of fine-tuning. Sticking with the same audio system allows you to explore its nuances more profoundly and ultimately enhance your listening experience.
I use cheaper obsidian pyramids in various sizes throughout my system. Found under chakra pyramids. I place one on my Tripp Lite Isobar (no cable plug-in) that I hear a difference on. Also, I found carbon fiber wall cover plates that help increase fidelity. I found them for $15-25. Howlite crystals increases sound signal when used in the output stage of the system. I’ve notice sound color saturation increase placing lapis lazuli, red jasper and malachite crystals on my preamp and DAC. Btw, thanks for validating to me about the effectiveness of fuses.
On Steve Gutenberg’s Audiophilliac, my system was used in his last ‘Viewers’ Systems’ episode at 19:58. Close up, you can see various placements of crystals. This includes two used on a tube Schumann Resonance Generator by Zero Zone.
I used to have a friend who swore by using crystals to increase his enjoyment when listening to music. Unfortunately, we don’t really talk anymore due to lifestyle differences. I heard he lives in a gated community now!
Once again, we are in accord. Also, the only time I have found vitriol boiling up my insides is toward those trolls and boors who try to demean or look down on others. Good on ya, mate! 😎
Blind testing has plenty of flaws too. It seemed important in this context, but I still don't see it as the gold standard so much as just another tool in the toolbox.
Yes but….some claims made by reviewers seem totally unbelievable and should be viewed with serious skepticism the entire audio review process is compromised by these charlatans.
@markaprill6501 just because they seem unbelievable, doesn't make them untrue. You need to consider any reviewer's or journalist's body of work to properly understand their reliability and honesty. Their testing methodology (unless completely flawed) isn't an indicator of anything.
The silver USB cable is designed to emphasize high frequencies, resulting in diminished bass. While this creates a more open and airy sound, it often leaves the lower frequencies feeling lean and empty. In contrast, a silver-plated copper cable strikes a more balanced tone, offering both lows and highs with greater equilibrium. The Megaras Termino, however, delivers a darker tonal character, revealing more intricate inner details and enhancing bass performance. It enriches the lower frequencies, making the sound fuller, without compromising the clarity of the highs. This produces a more three-dimensional and immersive depth, whereas the silver cable, though airy, tends to sound more forward and lacks the same level of depth.
@@AudiophileRocks I use all silver cables too. To increase bass, I turn up mid bass on my computer’s EQ. I’ve noticed an increase of subwoofer heft and depth by using an Aucharm ‘red’ fuse from silver to gold fuse direction.
You can skip this kind of stuff, and the April fools videos too. We're just here to hear about real tweaks that work and you're one of the few channels that actually covers them.
I for one am glad he does these kinds of videos. It's up to us to skip the video if it doesn't hit a topic we want to hear about. It is possible that magnetism in rocks could make an audible difference in our equipment so now we know the answer to this question.
@@PassionforSound I have done extensive testing using AB switching between speakers and amps. There would be a requirement of identical systems using the different USB cables before real-time switching may be accomplished.
@27b-6Buttle ah, yes. I've been wanting to setup a system like that for ages, but getting two identical DACs at a high enough level to resolve the details has been the challenge.
@@PassionforSoundAnd here i thought your were thorough! 😅 JK, but for real, I love your gag videos and this was so fun, I honestly want one for the irony and silliness. Also, love your voice, so calming like a hot cup of tea!
Oh man, soon as I seen the rock I laughed. My wife has a large crystal collection. She can 'feel' them and I can't lol But in saying that. I support her and her love for them. Just like she supports me and my love for hifi. She's even coming with me tomorrow to the Melbourne hifi show. Each to their own I guess. Not something I'd buy. But I'd drop $1k on a I2S cable hahaha
Haha. Yeah, my wife and I are believers in crystals too for healing work and the like, but they don't influence audio as far as I can tell. Make sure you come by and say hello today at the show. I'll be in the Headzones section most of the time. Chris from Radiance AV (with the Chord and Meze gear) can get a hold of me if you can't find me.
Like your experience, my wife can feel the crystals, while I cannot. I can only hear the effects of the crystals in the audio system. It's fascinating how crystals can affect people differently; some individuals feel their presence, while others, like myself, perceive their impact through sound. This variation suggests that these tweaks may not resonate with everyone.
Yup I have a large crystal bear that sits atop my magni piety . It sounds better. Why ? because the bear keeps the cables from dragging the unit off my desk and un-plugging the power. A plugged in magni sounds better than a unplugged one. Yep 100% crystals help.
I've been integrating Black Obsidian Tumbled Stones into my setup for years, placing them on my DAC, amp, and powered speakers with transformative results. Despite their modest price-just 20p each-the sonic improvements are nothing short of revelatory. These stones seem to unlock hidden layers in the music, expanding the soundstage to unprecedented dimensions while delivering jaw-dropping instrument separation. The clarity they bring is sublime, enriching the highs without a hint of sharpness. Black Obsidian Tumbled Stones are the most underrated tweak in the audiophile world. Forget cables-this is the tweak that elevates your system to the next plane of auditory nirvana.
I agree that crystals produce a greater effect than cables. This is why I stopped building cables years ago and now focus solely on crystal tweaks. One of my favorite stones is Black Obsidian, which I have used for the past 12 years. Different black crystals and stones yield distinctly varied sounds. For example, Hematite produces a heavier sound, while Obsidian provides a more lightweight quality. Both contribute to a darker sound with greater depth and inner detail; however, Hematite imparts an extra heaviness and coziness, whereas Obsidian delivers a lighter, more airy sound that feels quicker. Black Quartz falls somewhere in between, offering the most neutral sound of the three. I use all of them in my designs to achieve the best of all worlds.
I remember the good old days when audiophile woo was cheap. Back in the 80s, one HiFi magazine claimed you could improve the sound of CDs by placing a small piece of paper under one of the CD players feet. Sure it didn't work but it also didn't cost anything either.
I understand your nostalgia for the past when audiophile tweaks were often more accessible and sometimes experimental in nature. The example you provided highlights the wide range of beliefs and claims that have circulated within the audiophile community over the years, some of which, like placing a piece of paper under a CD player, were indeed low-cost but often yielded dubious results. Today, the focus has shifted toward creating scientifically grounded enhancements that genuinely improve sound quality. Our catalog reflects this evolution, showcasing products developed through extensive research and innovation. For instance, in 2024, our cheapest tweak is priced at $9, while the upcoming 2025 catalog will introduce the $299 Termino as our most affordable option. This price adjustment is necessary because many of our tweaks have been sold at less than manufacturing cost, and it is unsustainable to continue doing so. Each product in our catalog represents a significant investment of time and resources-over $200,000 in research and experimentation over the past two decades. We are committed to delivering meaningful improvements in audio fidelity that stand apart from whimsical claims. While the era of inexpensive tweaks may seem behind us, we strive to provide solutions that genuinely enhance the listening experience, ensuring that our offerings deliver exceptional value and quality.
@@AudiophileRocks Do you remember the green CD pen? It was a $25 marking pen that had a thick green ink and you ran it around the outer edge of your CDs. The theory was that the CD plastic acted like a fibre-optic cable and that laser light going sideways through the disc could interfere with the laser reading the disc. The green colour was supposed to absorb the stray light. However, I wondered why they didn't use a black ink as that would absorb all stray wavelengths of light. I figured out the the pen they sold for $25 was a relabelled marking pen sold at Officeworks for $2.50 so I got a green and a black one. I figured out why they didn't use the black pen, the ink would flake off the disc while the green would firmly stick when it dried. I even have a few CDs 30 odd years later that still have this green edge on them. Note: I couldn't hear any difference due to the green pen.
@@mddawson1 In the past, I used the AudioDesk CD Sound Improver, a machine designed to sand the edges of CDs into a specific angle. Additionally, I employed a black pen to mark the edges of the CDs. Initially, I was unable to discern any difference in sound quality, which left me disappointed. I returned the machine and received a second unit, but once again, I could not perceive any improvement. After sending it back a second time, I ended up losing a significant amount of money. Despite this, I was left with dozens of CDs that had been cut, though I still couldn't hear any difference. However, ten years later, I revisited those CDs and was astonished to hear a dramatic improvement in sound quality. The difference was truly night and day. This experience demonstrates that one's level of experience in HiFi listening plays a crucial role in perceiving such differences. As a beginner, it's often difficult to detect significant changes in sound quality.
It isn't a great note or "noteworthy" that you didn't hear a difference with the green pen. Listeners with more experience and better "ears" always hear a difference on a treated disc. Green absorbs light wonderfully,, that's why plant leaves are green, not black. The green absorbs some of the stray lase light bouncing around in there. How many people who laugh at greening cds have actually bought a cd of the same title and A/B'd a painted disc with an unpainted disc? Very few! And the green paint pen that was released for.cd for.for.cd edge greening, had a notch near the tip, the exact size of the thickness of a cd, that you could green a cd real fast, with less risk of the pen slipping off the edge of the cd while greening.. It was not the same as the Office store pen.
@@sidesup8286 Twenty years ago, when I was a beginner, I performed numerous CD treatments but couldn't hear a difference. However, ten years later, I compared my treated CDs and noticed a dramatic difference. I was cutting the CDs at specific angles, painting the edges, demagnetizing the discs, and burning the CDs onto black discs using a power regenerator, while writing at low speeds for optimal sound quality. I couldn't hear a difference until a decade later, after gaining substantial experience with cables and vibration control first.
Yes, the Megaras Termino is priced at $299 each, representing the best version available. We have built cheaper models in the past, which are now discontinued due to their lesser effectiveness. The more Termino units you use, the greater the effect becomes. It’s similar to a vacuum cleaner: the more suction force you have, the better you can remove noise from the audio system. For optimal sound quality, it is recommended to cover all RCA ports in the audio system. For instance, a previous generation of Termino was only half as effective, meaning you would need two of those units to achieve the same effect as a single Megaras Termino. With the Megaras model, you receive better value. Each generation of the Termino has doubled in performance; for example, earlier models from three generations back were sold for $129 each, but you would need eight of those units to match the performance of one $299 Megaras Termino. For the Termino seven generations back, which cost $39, you would need 128 units to achieve the same performance as a single Megaras Termino. This clearly demonstrates that the Megaras provides the best value for your investment.
Talking about vibration on the electronic parts, you may try Marigo Audio VTS DOTs or SMD. He could explain the science behind his products and it works well. It has been in the market for over than two decades....😊
I have to say I see this as kind of rage porn. Whilst it’s certainly interesting to explore the boundaries of the hobby this kind of video just stirs the hornets nest more than anything. I suspect there are more people wanting to be triggered by this than those who would be genuinely interested in the exploring the outer/ outer limits of the hobby…
Perhaps. I produced the video because I was curious to try them for myself and see if they could potentially have any impact. There are those of us that are happy exploring and experiencing, and there are others who want to hold a firm mental position and rage at anyone who challenges it.
@@PassionforSound At the end of the day it’s your channel ( you could review the audio effects of tea leafs if you liked) People ultimately have a choice whether to watch what you review or not. I get it. But if I wanted to find a way to stir things up reviewing audio crystals that cost $400 plus would be the perfect way to do it. From reading the comments this appears to be the case.
Always. I hope this one also demonstrates that while I am open minded, I'm not just believing everything that's claimed by a manufacturer and trust my own ears (after extensive listening and comparisons) first and foremost.
I'm agnostic regarding crystals but I do find it amusing when skeptics get worked up since every electronic device we use runs on... crystals, and if they told a normie 'no really the world runs on piezo electric crystals' they would seem just as odd as someone with a rock on their dac.
Interesting video! Yepp, subjective perception of an improvement is clearly a component of enjoyment. I'm happy to be unaffected by snake oil like that. Other than that, I would just like to see a proper, honest, investigative interview with people who productify that kind of stuff (audiophile crystals), market it, and sell it. After all, what serious company develops, markets and sells a product (like a car, a computer or a camera) without testing it and demonstrating that it works... My guess is that most of the folks supplying the world with audiophile crystals are indeed doing it to make money, knowing that any objective effects are doubtful at best. Perhaps they think "if people want it, we will simply deliver it", and don't really care about whether it works or not. The world has evolved quite a bit from selling working stuff to selling emotions. I'm kind of happy I don't work with marketing... I'm afraid I couldn't stand all that falsehood it seems require to be successful at it.
I can only assume that he honestly hears the differences himself and believes in them, but I think it's the result of unconscious biases or other, external factors.
@@PassionforSound Thank you for your comment and for sharing your thoughts on this topic. It’s crucial to recognize how individual differences in perception can significantly influence our experiences with sound. As someone with aphantasia, I lack the ability to visualize mental images, which fundamentally shapes my engagement with audio and the assessment of tweaks. Given my condition, it is quite unlikely for me to "hear things that aren’t there," especially since I focus solely on the auditory experience. Without the capacity for mental imagery, my perceptions are rooted directly in sound, allowing me to discern differences based purely on how they actually sound rather than being influenced by expectations or visual associations. This focus on the auditory experience is further enhanced by my analytical approach to evaluating sound quality, which relies on empirical testing and objective measurement. Moreover, the appearance of the tweaks plays no role in my auditory perception. I hear how the tweak sounds-nothing else. The aesthetics of an audio tweak, whether it is visually appealing or unconventional, do not affect the sound I experience. My evaluation is centered entirely on the audio characteristics and measurable performance, ensuring that any conclusions I draw about the effectiveness of tweaks are based solely on their sonic impact. Ultimately, while biases and external factors can influence how anyone experiences sound, my aphantasia and commitment to objective evaluation minimize the likelihood of perceiving non-existent differences. Thank you for engaging in this important discussion!
Thanks for your comment. I don't know enough about our auditory systems and the connection to mental imagery to know how they might interact, but I think every proposed tweak deserves open minded consideration and discussion so that each person can form their own opinions.
Isn't it the case that suffers of Aphantasia also struggle with auditory memory and auditory imaging, potentially interfering with your ability to correctly compare a piece of music before tweak with after tweak. This would potentially make it more difficult to avoid cognitive bias during testing. In other words it is not likely that your Aphantasia makes your auditory assessment tools more acute or reliable, as you suggest. I am not accusing you of telling fibs. In fact I think you are entirely sincere but wonder if your perceptual processing issues make you more vulnerable to the psychoacoustics traps we all fall into at times. Pure speculation on my part and no offence intended.
@@jimfarrell4635 While aphantasia affects visual imagery, it doesn't necessarily impede other forms of sensory processing, like auditory memory. In fact, my auditory memory remains highly acute, and I believe it is actually a strength in my work with HiFi tweaking. For example, I have the ability to recall voices of people I haven't met in decades, and more pertinently, I can remember exactly how my audio system sounded 20 years ago. This suggests that my long-term auditory memory is particularly strong and that I have a sharp sense of how sound evolves over time. When comparing a piece of music before and after a tweak, I rely heavily on this auditory memory, which allows me to recall specific characteristics of the sound in great detail. Unlike visual memory, which can be distracted by external cues, my focus is purely on the auditory realm. In my view, this might actually reduce the risk of cognitive bias during testing. I can maintain a clear mental record of the sound without being swayed by mental imagery or other irrelevant factors. Of course, psychoacoustic effects are something we all contend with, and I’m mindful of the potential for bias in subjective listening tests. That’s why I apply a meticulous, structured methodology, conducting repeated tests over long periods to ensure consistency in my assessments. I do not rely on a single listening session to make a judgment. Instead, I revisit the sound repeatedly, cross-referencing it with my long-term memory to track even the most subtle improvements.
*DUDE! I ALMOST BLOCKED YOUR CHANNEL!* Had I not stayed and listened a little longer, I would have stopped watching your channel for good... IMO, You waited just a bit too long to come clean with your perspective about this snake-oil. Others may have already dropped you. Otherwise, I enjoy your work ;)
Just for a few bucks, I'll take a shit on your devices, and you'll see a sublime improvement in sound. 😎 As for the smell, I decline all responsibility ! 😇
I remember these rocks and stuff when DMS talk about them i thought this was a genius way to rob people's hard earned Cash 😉 next thing we will be getting is a eardrum food or something to make us hear better than ever
Tuning chips composed of metal are akin to adding fuel to the fire; anything constructed from metal should be avoided in a HiFi system, as it introduces a metallic, irritating sound. The most natural-sounding materials are crystals, ores, minerals, and clay, with only a trace of silver used to balance the sound and activate the cleaning properties. For my tweaks, I specifically use the purest Swedish iron as the source of the ferromagnet, which helps fine-tune magnetic properties without compromising sound quality. In 2010, when I released my first tweak, 5 out of 5 customers who compared it to the Shakti Stone declared that my tweak was superior. Since then, I have introduced thousands of improved models.
He means you can't "hear" very well. Discern differences! Not the biggest difference but an improvement. The sound is crisper (and other things) with the crystals. If its easier for you, concentrate on just the crispness aspect
@@sidesup8286 I remember 20 years ago when I was a beginner; I couldn’t hear a difference with the first interconnects I tried, nor with the second interconnects, but I could discern a difference with the third interconnects. Shortly thereafter, I experimented with CD tweaks and couldn’t hear a difference at that time, but ten years later, I was able to hear a difference quite easily. Today, everything I do to my audio system makes a difference. Even the addition of a simple logo to a tweak reduces sound quality; this is why I keep all my tweaks minimalistic, devoid of any extraneous elements. Painting the tweak would blur the sound and diminish detail. Each tweak has been meticulously crafted, with the crystals positioned at the optimal depth at the surface of the clay to ensure the highest level of performance. If the crystals are pressed too deeply, it results in a flat sound.
The creator forgot to mention that in addition to purchasing the audiophile rocks, you also need to be on drugs to hear a difference. It's the combination of both that makes the sound better!
Don't know if it's ever been properly scientifically evaluated (very doubtful), but most of us that smokin' 🌿 makes music sound VERY different. And much much more enjoyable for me 😈
He should try his “magic” crystals in a hobby where most of the people are women because they love crystals even though in audio there are a lot of believers in expensive snake oil.
I only use tweaks that are proven to work. That's why I put a lace doily under my amp, shine a blue lamp on my CD transport and put polka dot bows one foot apart on my speaker cables!
Anyone who can actually hear an improvement with these products should try my range of Magic Beans. Only $299 for a pack of six. Place one Magic Bean on each piece of equipment and be amazed. Also, I have a range of Audiophile Paint for Enhanced Room Treatment. Only $799 a can. Don’t knock it if you have never tried it.
He’s selling something that scientifically and objectively does not make one iota of difference. Just because it’s aimed at a very niche market does not excuse the sale of this kind of product. It’s a blatant scam. And the person selling it deserves to be called out as such. Just because he’s preying on the extra dumb and wealthy does not make it ok. He happily lied to you about actually hearing a difference himself, so he will happily lie to take your money.
I appreciate your perspective and understand your skepticism regarding products like the Termino. However, I encourage you to consider the objective evidence that supports its efficacy. The Termino has been rigorously tested by a skeptic using a high-end oscilloscope, demonstrating a significant decrease in noise levels in the approximately 1 kHz range, from -122 dB to around -130 dB. This measurable reduction in noise underscores its potential to genuinely enhance audio quality. In contrast, the Cardas RCA Caps were tested at the same time and showed no discernible difference in performance.
@@guybrushtwood The price at which these units are sold is significantly lower than the development costs, primarily due to the rarity of the crystals in the formula. These materials cannot be replicated and take millions of years to form, making them increasingly scarce on our planet. As a result, these crystals are soon to be depleted from Earth, underscoring the urgency and value of each unit. I have maxed out my system with the Termino due to the limited number of RCA ports available. However, when it comes to the rocks placed on the chassis, there is effectively no limit to how many can be used. Currently, I have almost 300 of these rocks integrated into my audio system, allowing me to further fine-tune and enhance its performance. I plan to reserve the final crystals for my own use, opting to implement the Megaras rocks on my system for optimal sound quality. Yet, I am willing to share the Termino, as I believe in its potential, even though these unique crystals are soon to be depleted from the Earth. Each unit reflects my dedication to delivering exceptional sound quality while highlighting the increasing rarity of the materials involved in crafting these unique audio enhancements.
@@guybrushtwood The price at which these units are sold is significantly lower than the development costs, primarily due to the rarity of the crystals in the formula. These materials cannot be replicated and take millions of years to form, making them increasingly scarce on our planet. As a result, these crystals are soon to be depleted from Earth, underscoring the urgency and value of each unit. I have maxed out my system with the Termino due to the limited number of RCA ports available. However, when it comes to the rocks placed on the chassis, there is effectively no limit to how many can be used. Currently, I have almost 300 of these rocks integrated into my audio system, allowing me to further fine-tune and enhance its performance. I plan to reserve the final crystals for my own use, opting to implement the Megaras rocks on my system for optimal sound quality. Yet, I am willing to share the Termino, as I believe in its potential, even though these unique crystals are soon to be depleted from the Earth. Each unit reflects my dedication to delivering exceptional sound quality while highlighting the increasing rarity of the materials involved in crafting these unique audio enhancements.
C'mon mate, it didn't work because you're in the wrong hemisphere. Now if you were in the northern hemisphere it would have worked just fine. Ok, do I need the sarcasm tags? I'll take your word on the sincerity of the manufacturer. But this is clearly an example of snake oil. There is no scientific way to test these devices. I mean you can test speaker cables and see how the length of the cable along w the materials used.... configuration... etc... has an impact on the signal. What's debatable is the impact it has on the sound. Or a company makes a product on a real scientific fact, yet its debatable on its impact which too is snake oil. (e.g. a $500USD power cable vs $500 AC power conditioner. Which do you think has a greater impact on your sound? )
I refuse to even consider that the creator of these products believes they make a difference to sound. That person is a scammer.
I understand your skepticism, and I appreciate your perspective. However, I can assure you that my commitment to the integrity of sound quality is genuine and deeply rooted in years of research and experimentation. My designs, which may not be visually appealing, are deliberately crafted to optimize audio performance rather than to attract attention.
It is highly unlikely that a scammer would choose to create products that look as unconventional and unrefined as these tweaks. Typically, scammers aim to create visually appealing items to capture interest and entice potential buyers, often opting for designs that look attractive, such as aesthetically pleasing orgonite pyramids. My focus on function over looks has led to a design that prioritizes sound quality above all else.
This commitment to sound fidelity is not merely a marketing ploy; it reflects a long-standing philosophy of placing performance first. I have dedicated over 15 years to refining these tweaks, guided by the belief that true audio quality transcends visual aesthetics.
@@AudiophileRocks It takes courage to face criticism head on, so points for that.
However, this is a none-answer. You didn't really address the criticism in any meaningful way. All you said is "hey, it's ugly so it must be real". That's kind of like saying "snake oil tastes awful, therefore it must be an effective medicine".
Can you provide a clear and (preferably) simple explanation for HOW these products supposedly work? What physical processes supposedly happen when introducing them into a system? Anything that could be verified or tested by any other means except "trust me, it works"?
@@orenshamir The Termino can be tested with a high-end oscilloscope, and the rock can be tested with an EMF tester. Both of these devices show a measurable difference. These tests were not conducted by me, but by skeptics and customers. Even if I were to conduct the tests myself, people might dismiss them as fake. Therefore, I urge you to test it yourself and form your own opinion.
This is ssonewhat ridiculous. No, not the product. Hearing sonic differences.that are not as big as a mountain, requires so many things; the tester/listener's acuity & ability being the main thing. I modify equipment and if I didn't use the same recordings, I've listened to hundreds of times, I might not hear differences either. You need to play recordings you are so intimately familiar with, with equip. you are so familiar with, that if there is anything different about the sound, you will hear it, & notice it almost immediately, and pick up on it. You also have to know what things to listen for; some people that don't hear differences, do not even know what to listen for. Reviews should be done by experienced enough audiophiles that if they hear something cleaner or sweeter, or more transparent etc., they know it!
This reminds me of cable doubters. Also it helps to listen to a variety of recordings you are as familiawr with as the back of your own hand with music from many genres;
@@sidesup8286 I agree; when I created the first crystal formula, I listened to the same 30-second song for five hours a day over the course of six months. Everything I listen to nowadays, I have heard hundreds of times, and I am very familiar with it. I use detail as my reference; if I hear something new from familiar albums, I know I am moving in the right direction. With my best tweaks, I discover a new world of detail in these familiar albums. When I add more tweaks to my system, it feels as though two music tracks are playing simultaneously, as they unlock a new layer of detail within the music.
This is why this channel is trustworthy, because Lachlan is open minded. There is often a lot of dismissal in the comments of trying these sorts of tweaks, I used to not believe sorbothane feet made a difference until I consistently heard it for myself, and learned not to dismiss anything as rubbish until I tried it personally. Takes guts to review products like this and do it with open mindedness and honesty.
Thanks Mark! I think it's important to try anything and everything with an open mind because there's still so much we don't understand. However, we also have to be equally as open to it not working as working. 🙂
@@PassionforSound well said.
I have a piece of concrete block sitting on top of my Eversolo streamer and audiophile switch box. Theory is the internal clocks are very sensitive to chassis vibration so the weight of the blocks may reduce chassis vibration. I don’t know if this tweak works but my system sounds really awesome.
Yeah, that's a real thing. The oscillator works by vibrating, extra vibrations throw it off.
I'd also drill at least 5x10mm holes in the sides of the case of the streamer to help the E-field energy balance within the unit as you can get standing waves generated by the clocks which run at 45.1584MHz and 49.152MHz. This unbalance can cause timing jitter and therefore temporal smear and a lack of detail in the high frequencies, caused by sub-harmonics of the two clock frequencies which manifest as a reduction of detail primarily in the higher octaves of brass instruments. It is subtle and due to the lock-in range of the oscillator digital filters being narrow due to the time constant of the PLL to provide long-term stability.
When the holes are drilled, be sure to clean the particulates out of the enclosure with audiophile grade de-ionised water to re-establish the molecular bonds within the structure of the enclosure.
@@rjy8960 cool story bro
@@rjy8960
Ho-ho-ho and har-de-har-har. So funny!
...except it wasn't...
Yes, isolating feet and similar vibration control can have a significant impact on sound.
Your production value is always high, now the entertainment value is right up there too! 😊
I'm so glad you're enjoying the content!
I totally get it, this works in the same way to those restaurants that provide an ipod, playing sounds of the ocean, while you eat your fish starter. It's revolutionary; able to elevate the humble sardine and make it taste like a million dollars (well, that was an exaggeration, but maybe $464...)
Thank you for an honest review, as it highlights that these tweaks are not suited for everyone. For the best sound, a cloth should not be placed under the rock, as it reduces the vibrations from entering the crystal formula inside. Furthermore, there is a slight delay after unplugging and re-plugging the Termino, as it operates similarly to a vacuum cleaner, requiring a moment to stabilize before reaching full functionality.
Am I right in thinking that crystals can and do affect magnetic fields, scientifically speaking?
@@RocketLauncherwithInfiniteAmmo Yes, you are correct in thinking that crystals can affect magnetic fields, although the degree and nature of their influence depend on the specific properties of the crystals involved. Scientifically speaking, some crystals exhibit diamagnetic properties, where they slightly repel magnetic fields, while others are paramagnetic, meaning they weakly attract magnetic fields. Certain crystals, such as magnetite or hematite, can even display more pronounced magnetic behavior, interacting more significantly with magnetic fields due to their iron content.
The effect of crystals on magnetic fields, while subtler than that of materials like iron or other ferromagnetic substances, can still be measured and observed. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where these materials are combined with magnetic elements, as the resulting interactions can shape the surrounding magnetic environment in unique ways. In my crystal formula, I take advantage of these properties by using a carefully selected combination of different crystals, each with its own magnetic and resonance characteristics.
The formula I use is designed to work both with and against the magnetic fields generated by the audio system, creating a dynamic push-pull effect. Some crystals in the array may repel certain magnetic fields, while others attract them, which creates a balanced environment that helps to manage and optimize the resonances within the system. This balancing act is further enhanced by the presence of pure Swedish iron ore, which plays a vital role in focusing and stabilizing the magnetic interactions, without overwhelming the subtler effects of the crystals.
What makes this system particularly complex and effective is the neutrality of the crystal formula. I avoid creating strong colorations in the sound, which can be the result of using a single type of crystal that overemphasizes certain frequencies. While these colorations can be easy to hear, they push the sound in one specific direction, often at the expense of tonal balance. My approach combines various types of crystals and magnetic materials to maintain neutrality, ensuring that the improvements in sound quality are genuine rather than a distortion caused by exaggerated frequency emphasis.
In essence, the crystals in my formula do indeed affect magnetic fields, but the interaction is finely tuned. By blending different materials, I’ve created a system that enhances the audio performance while preserving the integrity of the original sound. The changes are subtle but profound, making the experience more natural, refined, and true to the source.
@@AudiophileRocks Well that raises another question, if they are finely tuned, how is it that the crystal knows where the field is being generated by the equipment, as in, would you not need a box made of the crystal to place the device inside? How by being placed nearby, does it affect the device if it doesn’t know the shape of the device or where the power supply is situated etc?
@@RocketLauncherwithInfiniteAmmo The rock significantly influences the magnetic field, and this can be easily measured using an EMF tester. The most substantial effect is observed on the transformer; placing the rock directly on it causes a dramatic spike in the electric field as detected by the EMF tester, whereas placing another metallic object shows no noticeable change.
You can place the rock anywhere on top of the chassis, and it will influence the sound by affecting both the magnetic field and the resonances of the audio system, as the loose crystals convert some of the resonance into heat energy.
@AudiophileRocks
Help write War and Peace ✌️
You have to have a very high resolving system your very familiar with, I use the Furutech clear line plug-in and they help tremendously but be advised to much of this kind of filtering can lead you to a overly sterile playback,they work using the same principles of crystal material for the disturbance in the magnetic fields for absorption
I don't doubt that a product like this could have an impact when connected to the component, but the Megaras Termino doesn't seem to have the right design to meaningfully impact the circuit.
@@PassionforSound I agree,but I use Furutech plug-ins and I can tell you they have made a positive improvement
My first thought was, why is Lachlan reviewing butt plugs 😬
Try the Unbound Nudge. You can thank me later.
I stopped just short of making a butt plug reference in the video, but the phrase was used multiple times when chatting to Patreon members. 😁
Like myself he is living under a delusional Green hyperinflation government and we all need to diversify our income sources.
@@PassionforSoundare you using audiophile fuses in any of your electronics?
Yes. I have an audiophile fuse in the Enleum AMP-23R. I can't recall the brand at the moment, but I shared a video about it as part of my "Tweak Week" series.
You should also check out those ground boxes/rca tubes. Kojo technology Crystal EP
I've heard about those and would be curious to try them
Furutech makes something similar with their NCF.
What is the best lubricant? DMT, CBD, THC, MDMA?
Please do more blind tests on the obvious stuff. Do like 20 runs on stuff like an apple dongle vs. a Burson with a Bifrost. Or something else. Just in spite of some of the people who still claim that there are 0 differences among all well-measuring units.
I've played around with sighted and blind tests a lot now and blind testing is less helpful to really understand the sound of a device because our brains still make stuff up during blind tests.
The other consideration is that the people who are convinced that measurements are all that matters will always find a way to negate the findings of any testing that doesn't support their views.
I remember my first gold plated toslink cable. Game changing!
😅
I admire your ability to talk about this stuff with a straight face.
I understand the fine, and i mean fine tuning of a system.
I obsessed over a good system in my younger years when i had the opportunity.
Speakers and their stands took a lot of adjustment to make them sing and sing they did.
Most think your bonkers but the end result was with cherries on the top.
Absolutely! It's incredible how sensitive our hearing is to even very subtle things... just not this subtle. 😁
The more you fine-tune your own audio system, the more pronounced the differences become. It’s akin to becoming accustomed to a specific musical instrument or sports equipment; with time and practice, you learn to optimize it to perfection. However, if you constantly switch equipment, it becomes challenging to achieve that deep level of fine-tuning. Sticking with the same audio system allows you to explore its nuances more profoundly and ultimately enhance your listening experience.
@AudiophileRocks Agreed.
I kept the same system for quiet some years.
I knew I was happy I stopped reading hifi mags. Lol
Also I didn't have a TV.
I use cheaper obsidian pyramids in various sizes throughout my system. Found under chakra pyramids.
I place one on my Tripp Lite Isobar (no cable plug-in) that I hear a difference on.
Also, I found carbon fiber wall cover plates that help increase fidelity. I found them for $15-25.
Howlite crystals increases sound signal when used in the output stage of the system.
I’ve notice sound color saturation increase placing lapis lazuli, red jasper and malachite crystals on my preamp and DAC.
Btw, thanks for validating to me about the effectiveness of fuses.
On Steve Gutenberg’s Audiophilliac, my system was used in his last ‘Viewers’ Systems’ episode at 19:58.
Close up, you can see various placements of crystals.
This includes two used on a tube Schumann Resonance Generator by Zero Zone.
I am a nut-job tweaker, and even for me, these were too much. I did enjoy the review and you giving them an honest shot.
My pleasure. I think it's important to try anything before writing it off (or adopting/recommending it). 🙂
I used to have a friend who swore by using crystals to increase his enjoyment when listening to music. Unfortunately, we don’t really talk anymore due to lifestyle differences. I heard he lives in a gated community now!
You mean prison? Or an asylum for the bewildered?
Once again, we are in accord.
Also, the only time I have found vitriol boiling up my insides is toward those trolls and boors who try to demean or look down on others.
Good on ya, mate! 😎
Thanks, put a smile on my face and made my day.
I'm glad you liked it!
Blind test way to step up brother! I called out a reviewer and requested a blind test on some cable claims that seemed unrealistic.
Blind testing has plenty of flaws too. It seemed important in this context, but I still don't see it as the gold standard so much as just another tool in the toolbox.
Yes but….some claims made by reviewers seem totally unbelievable and should be viewed with serious skepticism the entire audio review process is compromised by these charlatans.
@markaprill6501 just because they seem unbelievable, doesn't make them untrue. You need to consider any reviewer's or journalist's body of work to properly understand their reliability and honesty. Their testing methodology (unless completely flawed) isn't an indicator of anything.
OMFG.... to be honest, I am starting not feeling sorry for people who spend tons of money to such idiotic products...
Curiosity can be a powerful force...
A terrible day in the bathroom was a nice euphemism.
😁
How would this compare
To a silver usb cable? 😮
The silver USB cable is designed to emphasize high frequencies, resulting in diminished bass. While this creates a more open and airy sound, it often leaves the lower frequencies feeling lean and empty. In contrast, a silver-plated copper cable strikes a more balanced tone, offering both lows and highs with greater equilibrium. The Megaras Termino, however, delivers a darker tonal character, revealing more intricate inner details and enhancing bass performance. It enriches the lower frequencies, making the sound fuller, without compromising the clarity of the highs. This produces a more three-dimensional and immersive depth, whereas the silver cable, though airy, tends to sound more forward and lacks the same level of depth.
@@AudiophileRocks
I use all silver cables too. To increase bass, I turn up mid bass on my computer’s EQ.
I’ve noticed an increase of subwoofer heft and depth by using an Aucharm ‘red’ fuse from silver to gold fuse direction.
You can skip this kind of stuff, and the April fools videos too. We're just here to hear about real tweaks that work and you're one of the few channels that actually covers them.
I for one am glad he does these kinds of videos. It's up to us to skip the video if it doesn't hit a topic we want to hear about.
It is possible that magnetism in rocks could make an audible difference in our equipment so now we know the answer to this question.
Also, what if I'd tried them and found that they did actually work? Got to try it to know...
Can you get more instant tests with your USB cable performance reviews ?
What do you mean?
@@PassionforSound I have done extensive testing using AB switching between speakers and amps.
There would be a requirement of identical systems using the different USB cables before real-time switching may be accomplished.
@27b-6Buttle ah, yes. I've been wanting to setup a system like that for ages, but getting two identical DACs at a high enough level to resolve the details has been the challenge.
@@PassionforSound enough level to resolve audio performance in a USB set of 4 wires that doesn't transfer any audio ?
@27b-6Buttle yes, because it also transmits (or rejects) noise into the DAC.
You didn't even try and pyramid solution to center the universal vibrations and access 4th dimensional sound! 😂
Oh... Maybe that's what went wrong...
@@PassionforSoundAnd here i thought your were thorough! 😅 JK, but for real, I love your gag videos and this was so fun, I honestly want one for the irony and silliness. Also, love your voice, so calming like a hot cup of tea!
@carybarlow 🙏♥️😁
Oh man, soon as I seen the rock I laughed. My wife has a large crystal collection. She can 'feel' them and I can't lol But in saying that. I support her and her love for them. Just like she supports me and my love for hifi. She's even coming with me tomorrow to the Melbourne hifi show. Each to their own I guess. Not something I'd buy. But I'd drop $1k on a I2S cable hahaha
Haha. Yeah, my wife and I are believers in crystals too for healing work and the like, but they don't influence audio as far as I can tell.
Make sure you come by and say hello today at the show. I'll be in the Headzones section most of the time. Chris from Radiance AV (with the Chord and Meze gear) can get a hold of me if you can't find me.
!!!!! AWESOME !!!!!
Like your experience, my wife can feel the crystals, while I cannot. I can only hear the effects of the crystals in the audio system. It's fascinating how crystals can affect people differently; some individuals feel their presence, while others, like myself, perceive their impact through sound. This variation suggests that these tweaks may not resonate with everyone.
Yup I have a large crystal bear that sits atop my magni piety . It sounds better. Why ? because the bear keeps the cables from dragging the unit off my desk and un-plugging the power. A plugged in magni sounds better than a unplugged one. Yep 100% crystals help.
Haha. This is the best use for such crystals, I think.
Yep. Darko's channel has led to a 15% worldwide increase in shiny metal doorstop for just the same use case.
You should try purple moon rocks. You’ll def hear a difference 😉
People have to be educated in the properties of the electrical magnetic field physics to understand the products filtering achievements
I've been integrating Black Obsidian Tumbled Stones into my setup for years, placing them on my DAC, amp, and powered speakers with transformative results. Despite their modest price-just 20p each-the sonic improvements are nothing short of revelatory. These stones seem to unlock hidden layers in the music, expanding the soundstage to unprecedented dimensions while delivering jaw-dropping instrument separation. The clarity they bring is sublime, enriching the highs without a hint of sharpness. Black Obsidian Tumbled Stones are the most underrated tweak in the audiophile world. Forget cables-this is the tweak that elevates your system to the next plane of auditory nirvana.
I agree that crystals produce a greater effect than cables. This is why I stopped building cables years ago and now focus solely on crystal tweaks. One of my favorite stones is Black Obsidian, which I have used for the past 12 years. Different black crystals and stones yield distinctly varied sounds. For example, Hematite produces a heavier sound, while Obsidian provides a more lightweight quality. Both contribute to a darker sound with greater depth and inner detail; however, Hematite imparts an extra heaviness and coziness, whereas Obsidian delivers a lighter, more airy sound that feels quicker. Black Quartz falls somewhere in between, offering the most neutral sound of the three. I use all of them in my designs to achieve the best of all worlds.
I remember the good old days when audiophile woo was cheap. Back in the 80s, one HiFi magazine claimed you could improve the sound of CDs by placing a small piece of paper under one of the CD players feet. Sure it didn't work but it also didn't cost anything either.
I understand your nostalgia for the past when audiophile tweaks were often more accessible and sometimes experimental in nature. The example you provided highlights the wide range of beliefs and claims that have circulated within the audiophile community over the years, some of which, like placing a piece of paper under a CD player, were indeed low-cost but often yielded dubious results.
Today, the focus has shifted toward creating scientifically grounded enhancements that genuinely improve sound quality. Our catalog reflects this evolution, showcasing products developed through extensive research and innovation. For instance, in 2024, our cheapest tweak is priced at $9, while the upcoming 2025 catalog will introduce the $299 Termino as our most affordable option. This price adjustment is necessary because many of our tweaks have been sold at less than manufacturing cost, and it is unsustainable to continue doing so.
Each product in our catalog represents a significant investment of time and resources-over $200,000 in research and experimentation over the past two decades. We are committed to delivering meaningful improvements in audio fidelity that stand apart from whimsical claims. While the era of inexpensive tweaks may seem behind us, we strive to provide solutions that genuinely enhance the listening experience, ensuring that our offerings deliver exceptional value and quality.
@@AudiophileRocks Do you remember the green CD pen? It was a $25 marking pen that had a thick green ink and you ran it around the outer edge of your CDs. The theory was that the CD plastic acted like a fibre-optic cable and that laser light going sideways through the disc could interfere with the laser reading the disc. The green colour was supposed to absorb the stray light. However, I wondered why they didn't use a black ink as that would absorb all stray wavelengths of light. I figured out the the pen they sold for $25 was a relabelled marking pen sold at Officeworks for $2.50 so I got a green and a black one. I figured out why they didn't use the black pen, the ink would flake off the disc while the green would firmly stick when it dried. I even have a few CDs 30 odd years later that still have this green edge on them. Note: I couldn't hear any difference due to the green pen.
@@mddawson1 In the past, I used the AudioDesk CD Sound Improver, a machine designed to sand the edges of CDs into a specific angle. Additionally, I employed a black pen to mark the edges of the CDs. Initially, I was unable to discern any difference in sound quality, which left me disappointed. I returned the machine and received a second unit, but once again, I could not perceive any improvement. After sending it back a second time, I ended up losing a significant amount of money. Despite this, I was left with dozens of CDs that had been cut, though I still couldn't hear any difference.
However, ten years later, I revisited those CDs and was astonished to hear a dramatic improvement in sound quality. The difference was truly night and day. This experience demonstrates that one's level of experience in HiFi listening plays a crucial role in perceiving such differences. As a beginner, it's often difficult to detect significant changes in sound quality.
It isn't a great note or "noteworthy" that you didn't hear a difference with the green pen. Listeners with more experience and better "ears" always hear a difference on a treated disc. Green absorbs light wonderfully,, that's why plant leaves are green, not black. The green absorbs some of the stray lase light bouncing around in there. How many people who laugh at greening cds have actually bought a cd of the same title and A/B'd a painted disc with an unpainted disc? Very few! And the green paint pen that was released for.cd for.for.cd edge greening, had a notch near the tip, the exact size of the thickness of a cd, that you could green a cd real fast, with less risk of the pen slipping off the edge of the cd while greening.. It was not the same as the Office store pen.
@@sidesup8286 Twenty years ago, when I was a beginner, I performed numerous CD treatments but couldn't hear a difference. However, ten years later, I compared my treated CDs and noticed a dramatic difference. I was cutting the CDs at specific angles, painting the edges, demagnetizing the discs, and burning the CDs onto black discs using a power regenerator, while writing at low speeds for optimal sound quality. I couldn't hear a difference until a decade later, after gaining substantial experience with cables and vibration control first.
That's $299 EACH. So $600 a pair or $464 for "magic crystals".
Admittedly, you only need a single Megaras Termini, but either way, it doesn't seem to do anything.
Yes, the Megaras Termino is priced at $299 each, representing the best version available. We have built cheaper models in the past, which are now discontinued due to their lesser effectiveness. The more Termino units you use, the greater the effect becomes. It’s similar to a vacuum cleaner: the more suction force you have, the better you can remove noise from the audio system. For optimal sound quality, it is recommended to cover all RCA ports in the audio system.
For instance, a previous generation of Termino was only half as effective, meaning you would need two of those units to achieve the same effect as a single Megaras Termino. With the Megaras model, you receive better value. Each generation of the Termino has doubled in performance; for example, earlier models from three generations back were sold for $129 each, but you would need eight of those units to match the performance of one $299 Megaras Termino. For the Termino seven generations back, which cost $39, you would need 128 units to achieve the same performance as a single Megaras Termino. This clearly demonstrates that the Megaras provides the best value for your investment.
@@AudiophileRocks Agian, for "magic crystal". Nope.
0:57 Why does the audio go out of phase?
It doesn't when I play it back
There will be at least one poor soul who’ll buy into this absurdity. Sadly, these snake oil goofs will be part of this hobby till the end of times.
Talking about vibration on the electronic parts, you may try Marigo Audio VTS DOTs or SMD. He could explain the science behind his products and it works well. It has been in the market for over than two decades....😊
Thanks for the tip!
I have to say I see this as kind of rage porn. Whilst it’s certainly interesting to explore the boundaries of the hobby this kind of video just stirs the hornets nest more than anything. I suspect there are more people wanting to be triggered by this than those who would be genuinely interested in the exploring the outer/ outer limits of the hobby…
Perhaps. I produced the video because I was curious to try them for myself and see if they could potentially have any impact. There are those of us that are happy exploring and experiencing, and there are others who want to hold a firm mental position and rage at anyone who challenges it.
@@PassionforSound At the end of the day it’s your channel ( you could review the audio effects of tea leafs if you liked) People ultimately have a choice whether to watch what you review or not. I get it. But if I wanted to find a way to stir things up reviewing audio crystals that cost $400 plus would be the perfect way to do it. From reading the comments this appears to be the case.
😂looks great in the fish tank
😂🐠🐡🐟
Should do a video about audiophile network purifiers too.
I've already tested one of those and it's great. I own it.
Im glad you found no difference because if you did my guess your reputation would be toast so you live another day.keep up the brave reviews.
Always. I hope this one also demonstrates that while I am open minded, I'm not just believing everything that's claimed by a manufacturer and trust my own ears (after extensive listening and comparisons) first and foremost.
All the crystals I've tested degraded the sound...😁
Those items must be the son of the inventor of the 1975 Pet Rock. The best one yet of accessory scams.
Making easy money is getting easier by the day...
I'm agnostic regarding crystals but I do find it amusing when skeptics get worked up since every electronic device we use runs on... crystals, and if they told a normie 'no really the world runs on piezo electric crystals' they would seem just as odd as someone with a rock on their dac.
Haha. That's very true!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! JUST LOVE IT!!!!! Made my day. Thank you!
I'm so glad you liked it!
Interesting video! Yepp, subjective perception of an improvement is clearly a component of enjoyment. I'm happy to be unaffected by snake oil like that. Other than that, I would just like to see a proper, honest, investigative interview with people who productify that kind of stuff (audiophile crystals), market it, and sell it. After all, what serious company develops, markets and sells a product (like a car, a computer or a camera) without testing it and demonstrating that it works... My guess is that most of the folks supplying the world with audiophile crystals are indeed doing it to make money, knowing that any objective effects are doubtful at best. Perhaps they think "if people want it, we will simply deliver it", and don't really care about whether it works or not. The world has evolved quite a bit from selling working stuff to selling emotions. I'm kind of happy I don't work with marketing... I'm afraid I couldn't stand all that falsehood it seems require to be successful at it.
I can only assume that he honestly hears the differences himself and believes in them, but I think it's the result of unconscious biases or other, external factors.
@@PassionforSound Thank you for your comment and for sharing your thoughts on this topic. It’s crucial to recognize how individual differences in perception can significantly influence our experiences with sound. As someone with aphantasia, I lack the ability to visualize mental images, which fundamentally shapes my engagement with audio and the assessment of tweaks.
Given my condition, it is quite unlikely for me to "hear things that aren’t there," especially since I focus solely on the auditory experience. Without the capacity for mental imagery, my perceptions are rooted directly in sound, allowing me to discern differences based purely on how they actually sound rather than being influenced by expectations or visual associations. This focus on the auditory experience is further enhanced by my analytical approach to evaluating sound quality, which relies on empirical testing and objective measurement.
Moreover, the appearance of the tweaks plays no role in my auditory perception. I hear how the tweak sounds-nothing else. The aesthetics of an audio tweak, whether it is visually appealing or unconventional, do not affect the sound I experience. My evaluation is centered entirely on the audio characteristics and measurable performance, ensuring that any conclusions I draw about the effectiveness of tweaks are based solely on their sonic impact.
Ultimately, while biases and external factors can influence how anyone experiences sound, my aphantasia and commitment to objective evaluation minimize the likelihood of perceiving non-existent differences. Thank you for engaging in this important discussion!
Thanks for your comment. I don't know enough about our auditory systems and the connection to mental imagery to know how they might interact, but I think every proposed tweak deserves open minded consideration and discussion so that each person can form their own opinions.
Isn't it the case that suffers of Aphantasia also struggle with auditory memory and auditory imaging, potentially interfering with your ability to correctly compare a piece of music before tweak with after tweak. This would potentially make it more difficult to avoid cognitive bias during testing. In other words it is not likely that your Aphantasia makes your auditory assessment tools more acute or reliable, as you suggest.
I am not accusing you of telling fibs. In fact I think you are entirely sincere but wonder if your perceptual processing issues make you more vulnerable to the psychoacoustics traps we all fall into at times.
Pure speculation on my part and no offence intended.
@@jimfarrell4635 While aphantasia affects visual imagery, it doesn't necessarily impede other forms of sensory processing, like auditory memory. In fact, my auditory memory remains highly acute, and I believe it is actually a strength in my work with HiFi tweaking. For example, I have the ability to recall voices of people I haven't met in decades, and more pertinently, I can remember exactly how my audio system sounded 20 years ago. This suggests that my long-term auditory memory is particularly strong and that I have a sharp sense of how sound evolves over time.
When comparing a piece of music before and after a tweak, I rely heavily on this auditory memory, which allows me to recall specific characteristics of the sound in great detail. Unlike visual memory, which can be distracted by external cues, my focus is purely on the auditory realm. In my view, this might actually reduce the risk of cognitive bias during testing. I can maintain a clear mental record of the sound without being swayed by mental imagery or other irrelevant factors.
Of course, psychoacoustic effects are something we all contend with, and I’m mindful of the potential for bias in subjective listening tests. That’s why I apply a meticulous, structured methodology, conducting repeated tests over long periods to ensure consistency in my assessments. I do not rely on a single listening session to make a judgment. Instead, I revisit the sound repeatedly, cross-referencing it with my long-term memory to track even the most subtle improvements.
*DUDE! I ALMOST BLOCKED YOUR CHANNEL!* Had I not stayed and listened a little longer, I would have stopped watching your channel for good... IMO, You waited just a bit too long to come clean with your perspective about this snake-oil. Others may have already dropped you. Otherwise, I enjoy your work ;)
Haha. I'm glad you stuck around. I tried dropping hints along the way about where I was going... 😁
Just for a few bucks, I'll take a shit on your devices, and you'll see a sublime improvement in sound. 😎
As for the smell, I decline all responsibility ! 😇
I remember these rocks and stuff when DMS talk about them i thought this was a genius way to rob people's hard earned Cash 😉 next thing we will be getting is a eardrum food or something to make us hear better than ever
Obviously the chakras were not aligned.
Tuning chips works better
Tuning chips composed of metal are akin to adding fuel to the fire; anything constructed from metal should be avoided in a HiFi system, as it introduces a metallic, irritating sound. The most natural-sounding materials are crystals, ores, minerals, and clay, with only a trace of silver used to balance the sound and activate the cleaning properties. For my tweaks, I specifically use the purest Swedish iron as the source of the ferromagnet, which helps fine-tune magnetic properties without compromising sound quality. In 2010, when I released my first tweak, 5 out of 5 customers who compared it to the Shakti Stone declared that my tweak was superior. Since then, I have introduced thousands of improved models.
@@AudiophileRocks Gabriel tech chips are not metal and they work great
@@razzman2987 What are they made of? I can't find any information about it, as their catalog is in German.
@@AudiophileRocks they dont say they work with hospitals for radiation etc
Shocker
Or just clean the wax out of your ears....😂
That's a more proven and consistent upgrade, I'd say.
@@PassionforSound 👍😁
Just don't do it using a very sharp crystal.
@@jimfarrell4635 😂
All channel creditabilty lost. Embarrassing.
So I'm guessing you didn't watch the whole video...
@@PassionforSoundWrong. Watched until the end. I'll stand by my comment. Embarrassing and loss of credibility.
@@sturdyblock Could you kindly explain why?
He means you can't "hear" very well. Discern differences! Not the biggest difference but an improvement. The sound is crisper (and other things) with the crystals. If its easier for you, concentrate on just the crispness aspect
@@sidesup8286 I remember 20 years ago when I was a beginner; I couldn’t hear a difference with the first interconnects I tried, nor with the second interconnects, but I could discern a difference with the third interconnects. Shortly thereafter, I experimented with CD tweaks and couldn’t hear a difference at that time, but ten years later, I was able to hear a difference quite easily. Today, everything I do to my audio system makes a difference. Even the addition of a simple logo to a tweak reduces sound quality; this is why I keep all my tweaks minimalistic, devoid of any extraneous elements. Painting the tweak would blur the sound and diminish detail. Each tweak has been meticulously crafted, with the crystals positioned at the optimal depth at the surface of the clay to ensure the highest level of performance. If the crystals are pressed too deeply, it results in a flat sound.
The creator forgot to mention that in addition to purchasing the audiophile rocks, you also need to be on drugs to hear a difference. It's the combination of both that makes the sound better!
Don't know if it's ever been properly scientifically evaluated (very doubtful), but most of us that smokin' 🌿 makes music sound VERY different. And much much more enjoyable for me 😈
Now that's an accessory we could get in to!
Yeah every new video everything is positive reviews this channel is a buyers
You didn't watch this one properly, did you?
He should try his “magic” crystals in a hobby where most of the people are women because they love crystals even though in audio there are a lot of believers in expensive snake oil.
That creator of that product will make a fortune if marketed to the right clientele,such as people with hemorrhoids.
😂
Crystals make a big difference in clocks. Haven't tried them on top or in a plug so I can't comment on that. Does seem a bit far-fetched.
Yep, in clocks, I'm all for it and I was open to this, but... no...
I always socket my amps with 2 red gems, 3 yellow gems and 1 radiant. Still waiting on the next patch to increase my radiant slots.
I only use tweaks that are proven to work. That's why I put a lace doily under my amp, shine a blue lamp on my CD transport and put polka dot bows one foot apart on my speaker cables!
Sounds like a very well researched setup! 😉
Anyone who can actually hear an improvement with these products should try my range of Magic Beans. Only $299 for a pack of six. Place one Magic Bean on each piece of equipment and be amazed. Also, I have a range of Audiophile Paint for Enhanced Room Treatment. Only $799 a can. Don’t knock it if you have never tried it.
He’s selling something that scientifically and objectively does not make one iota of difference. Just because it’s aimed at a very niche market does not excuse the sale of this kind of product. It’s a blatant scam. And the person selling it deserves to be called out as such. Just because he’s preying on the extra dumb and wealthy does not make it ok. He happily lied to you about actually hearing a difference himself, so he will happily lie to take your money.
I remember being told about the magic of sitting under a pyramid, too. About the same.
I appreciate your perspective and understand your skepticism regarding products like the Termino. However, I encourage you to consider the objective evidence that supports its efficacy. The Termino has been rigorously tested by a skeptic using a high-end oscilloscope, demonstrating a significant decrease in noise levels in the approximately 1 kHz range, from -122 dB to around -130 dB. This measurable reduction in noise underscores its potential to genuinely enhance audio quality.
In contrast, the Cardas RCA Caps were tested at the same time and showed no discernible difference in performance.
@@AudiophileRocks how much does a unit cost you to make?
@@guybrushtwood The price at which these units are sold is significantly lower than the development costs, primarily due to the rarity of the crystals in the formula. These materials cannot be replicated and take millions of years to form, making them increasingly scarce on our planet. As a result, these crystals are soon to be depleted from Earth, underscoring the urgency and value of each unit.
I have maxed out my system with the Termino due to the limited number of RCA ports available. However, when it comes to the rocks placed on the chassis, there is effectively no limit to how many can be used. Currently, I have almost 300 of these rocks integrated into my audio system, allowing me to further fine-tune and enhance its performance.
I plan to reserve the final crystals for my own use, opting to implement the Megaras rocks on my system for optimal sound quality. Yet, I am willing to share the Termino, as I believe in its potential, even though these unique crystals are soon to be depleted from the Earth. Each unit reflects my dedication to delivering exceptional sound quality while highlighting the increasing rarity of the materials involved in crafting these unique audio enhancements.
@@guybrushtwood The price at which these units are sold is significantly lower than the development costs, primarily due to the rarity of the crystals in the formula. These materials cannot be replicated and take millions of years to form, making them increasingly scarce on our planet. As a result, these crystals are soon to be depleted from Earth, underscoring the urgency and value of each unit.
I have maxed out my system with the Termino due to the limited number of RCA ports available. However, when it comes to the rocks placed on the chassis, there is effectively no limit to how many can be used. Currently, I have almost 300 of these rocks integrated into my audio system, allowing me to further fine-tune and enhance its performance.
I plan to reserve the final crystals for my own use, opting to implement the Megaras rocks on my system for optimal sound quality. Yet, I am willing to share the Termino, as I believe in its potential, even though these unique crystals are soon to be depleted from the Earth. Each unit reflects my dedication to delivering exceptional sound quality while highlighting the increasing rarity of the materials involved in crafting these unique audio enhancements.
Here they smoke too much or it's alcohol/pills etc...
C'mon mate, it didn't work because you're in the wrong hemisphere. Now if you were in the northern hemisphere it would have worked just fine.
Ok, do I need the sarcasm tags?
I'll take your word on the sincerity of the manufacturer. But this is clearly an example of snake oil.
There is no scientific way to test these devices. I mean you can test speaker cables and see how the length of the cable along w the materials used.... configuration... etc... has an impact on the signal. What's debatable is the impact it has on the sound.
Or a company makes a product on a real scientific fact, yet its debatable on its impact which too is snake oil.
(e.g. a $500USD power cable vs $500 AC power conditioner. Which do you think has a greater impact on your sound? )
MEMES