@@Thabosshoss I haven't noticed any difference in that regard myself, and I'm assuming that the video was just divided into chapters while editing. So the main difference to me is that it's a bit more of a hazzle to skip past their commercial that has been spliced into a hundred videos before already.
It's not that Rolex specifically has problems with the color red, red absorbs more high energy photons which damage the pigment more easily. You see this on cars, flags, toys or anything else with red color.
I lucked out in 2013 when I purchased a pepsi 16710 from 2007 for £3,800 - I only found out a few years ago it is a transitional watch that runs the same movement they put in the 6 digit. Solid build, durable, updated movement (for then) but the slimmer proportions of the 5 digit. It also carries a different dial with serif minute markers and slightly different font. A watch I will always keep, to me the perfect gmt.
I didn’t either. All I took away was the need to flex the white gold GMT which is $20k more and “jangles” less on the basis it is a heavier metal when in reality it has a few more links removed for a tighter fit.
Technically the new beats it in every area. I love vintage, but I’m of a certain age. Same with anything vintage really, could be a watch, car, house etc… etc…. The Morden will out perform it in every area. You buy vintage with your heart not your head.
I bought my 2002 16710 Coke pre-owned in 2003 for £1,900 (around $2,500), Wore it every day for eight years without a thought or care until the prices started going nuts and it actually became too valuable as a daily beater (thieves know the value). So now it sits in a safe quietly appreciating. The first successful investment I ever had for something that was never nought as an investment,
I picked up a BLNR on oyster from my AD 3 weeks ago - I am far from upset lol. I literally blew up my collection and sold all my other watches in rotation to rebuild around the BLNR. The GMTII will be my daily from here on out. Have a couple other pieces lined up from my AD, also Rolex models. The GMT is far more comfortable than the Sub on the wrist, flatter case back and nearly 1mm thinner.
That's how I felt when I got my BLNR from the AD 2 years ago. I had the Sub before and the OP41 green afterwards. I just only picked up the sprite Monday from the same AD after 2 years. But the BLNR had the most wrist time out of the collection. Sub basically doesn't see the day of light.
I think some of the opinions from you guys are conflict of interest. always saying, vintage is better than Modern in which you guys specialize in selling older watches. 😮. Of course we all have our own pinions, and we should respect it.
Neo-vintage is the best of both worlds. I have the 16610 sub. The perfect case size, aluminum bezel, 904 steel, sapphire, better movement, still waterproof with no worries and tritium hour markers. I personally love the bracelet on older Rolex just because it’s so light and comfortable to wear daily.
@@andrewgiblin3468 oh that’s right mine has drilled lugs too!! I swear this model has everything that was great about vintage Rolex and everything great about modern Rolex.
I agree I have a 14060m Rolex Submariner. It's an absolute delight to wear. As far as I'm concerned the 14060m and the 16610 were the last of the best Rolex Submariners. The new Submariner's don't have the cool factor like the pre ceramics
I found the super case noticeably larger on the Sub 114060 I owned vs the 14060 I had. However, I don’t find the super case obnoxious on my BLNR. It just feels like a very well built, substantial watch. The side profile still has those gorgeous Rolex sport case lines.
wonder if the white gold, black dial pepsi will become a future classic due to the short production run and that many dials have been changed out with blue dials??
I bought a 3 month old 16710 for £2,050 in 2003. The previous owner bought it with a black bezel since he really wanted a Submariner. I wanted the black and red bezel and had one fitted. It’s only an insert. That’s why I can’t understand this obsession with Pepsi etc. It takes less than a minute to swap them.
I am not upset. But I think the policy is very bad. I had the great fortune to order a jubilee band for my 126710BLRO in addition to the Oyster later and now I swap bands - depending on my gusto. What annoys me more is the quality. I have had to have the SL renewed on a tudor bb48 and a 16710 because not enough was applied to the hands. but: i have that again on the hand of my new blro - but what rolex about it? wow, that's normal and in the tollerances. amazing that it's in the tollerances to see gray fields in the dots or in the hands with the naked eye. this experience and also the often arrogant manner of the salesmen have made me to be enthusiastic about other brands.
I owned a 5513 that was minty, but was too delicate (compared to modern Subs). I sold it in 2016 and bought a Hulk. No matter what the vintage tool watches were intended to do when new, they just don't hold up to a careless lifestyle. Acrylic crystals, stamped bracelets, etc. can't hold a candle to new Subs.
True, but the 4 digits are way more delicate than the 5 digits. While the 6 digit models of today are even sturdier, the neo vintage 5 digit models sort of scratch the vintage itch while still performing well and not running the risk of getting damaged easily. If the 5512/5513 hadn’t exploded in price, i might still want one. But now I’m more tempted to get a 14060m as a compromise. Still, i do lust for that matte dial and acrylic crystal.
I love the pre ceramic Rolex Submariners and GMTs. I also own a Submariner 14060m. The wearability on the pre ceramics are phenomenal 👌 a pre ceramic Pepsi is next on the list. Not really a fan of the current GMTs. The pre ceramics have a serious cool factor and all the hallmarks of the OG GMTs
Apparently the reason for the variance in bezels: most other brands up to that point would use separate solid halves of a ceramic bezel insert, or simply paint over it. Rolex uses a more expensive and more durable method using one single ceramic insert and a high-pressure chemical process called sintering to create the second color before the platinum inlays are set - the second color (red) is infused with the base color (blue) throughout one half of the insert on a molecular level, and it took them a few tries to get the exact composition right, tweaking various shades of blue and red. Red + Blue = Purple.
Regarding the sizing, back then they also came out with a huge watch in the yacht master 2. They tweaked the gmt but did dabble also in ridiculously large sizes
Because I'm a watch guy, I quite enjoyed this. But at the same time, I'm able to stand back and realise that it's also a whole load of meaningless jawing about things of absolutely no importance whatsoever to 99.999999999999999% of the world's population. What a strange hobby.
I have the 16710 Coke, absolutely love it. 33yrs later and it’s still looks like new. Last servicing I switched out the coke bezel for an all black. IMO, the all black bezel looks real classy.
The ceramic Pepsi bezel colors are not nice. The blue looks more like purple, and the red lacks richness, nothing at all like the colors found on the aluminum bezels. Just compare the blue colors between old and new at 16:35
Amazing video, very interesting hearing those parts of history. Please make a video like this on Daydates and which era you think is a smarter take. That would be awesome. Keep it up!
Preach B/B 16710 here with over 4000 days of wear, a few hundreds were in subtropical jungles. Lasted longer than my marriage and with less damages and …uh… misunderstanding, lol. A true tool watches that can be used for bartering too.
I have 4 GMT Master II’s. 16760 Coke Fat Lady, 16710 Coke, 126710BLNR (Batman) and the 126711CHNR (Root Beer) To be 100% honest I love my 16710 Coke and it is the most comfortable and easy to wear. I hope in the near future Rolex Re Releases the Ceramic Coke GMT II. That would be an amazing modern GMT Master II .
The proportions of the non supercase models are way better. If Rolex released a new GMT master 2 with the same proportions of the older models, it would be pretty much the perfect watch
126719blro if ppl wanna know. First with black dial then to blue. But the Meteorite dial is also under the same reference. But the full name would be 126719-001/002/003 Like my YM 126621-001. Brown. But 126719blro everyone will understand if u remember the model number
Rolex watches are falling for several reasons. For years Rolex has used Tudor as its cat paw! It has manipulated Rolex prices by artificial watch shortages and offering a cheaper watch. Rolex has raised its watches prices by bait and switch. There is no reason for their inflated prices. In my opinion, it is simple rip-off. In the past Rolex watches were sold in many jewlery stores. The middle class were capable of buying them. Rolex makes a decent watch. I owned one in the 1980's. But I object to their business methods. So I wear Omega watches. Omega is not perfect but in my opinion, it beats Rolex not only in value but their business practices are more in agreement with mine. I am starting to think the public is waking up on Rolex. Rolex is an overinflated balloon. I believe their watch line is stale and way overpriced. If people start switching brands Rolex prices could fall like a rock. There are many other quality watch companies. It is insane for the demand for a Rolex diving watch. It is completely illogical. A field watch or a GMT is believable.
So why are GMT=II owners upset? => it is because Rolex sucker punched its own white gold GMT Pepsi black-dial owners by releasing the exact same watch in stainless steel, thus removing the message to white gold owners that they get something in perceived exclusivity for that extra $20,000 you have to pay for it. What does one get when upgrading from steel to white gold Rolex? Stealth Wealth became became as a new money tire blow-out. Rolex messed up. Rolex owes these customers something. I don't know what, but they owe them.
GMT is a jewelry watch which are loved by many watch investors. As a watch collector not an investor, I do not recommend any GMT as the usability is limited. To keep away from being noticeable by people, a low profile black Explorer 2 or a black bezel yacht master may be a better choice. The yacht master has the bazel to keep track of time passed.
Most useful complication for me. If you work across time zones, (especially if there is an AM/PM changes and inconsistent Summer time) it is a life saver. Doing the math is much harder when you are jet lagged from travel. Also, on super long travel days, my phone has run out of juice, or I cant find a charger. The watch has saved me.
Even if you didn’t need the GMT function I still don’t see how it’s usability is limited when compared to the Explorer 2 or Yachtmaster. Neither of those watches has more features. The GMT technically still lets you keep track of time passed with the bezel, like the YM and Sub would.
Great video overall, thanks. Now stop flashing the glare of the watch into the camera. Look at the watch thru the monitor instead of from your point of view ;)
I was an ink formulation chemist for years and still work as an engineer in the printing industry. Red and any shade there of are the most challenging colors for stability and permanence. I am not surprised by this challenge that Rolex is having. Even red cars can be more expensive than other colors.
I have a 16613 as my daily and my 16710 Coke that is in near perfect condition. I bought it from a the original owner and a collector who may have worn it 25 times since 2001. I love my GMT. More importantly I love that Rolex has not rereleased a Coke. Makes mine even more special to me.
Neo vintage is the way to go. My daily watch is my Omega Speedmaster Schumacher 3518.50. Still feel solid on the wrist. But has that great smaller presence that I like in the neo vintage. Next watch will be a Rolex Sub 14060M 2 line.
Nice video guys My mid 90s Pepsi GMT Master, because of the less slab sidedness than the ceramic Sub is actually lighter to wear and also more scratch resistant than either my Sub or pre ceramic Daytona I’ll take that older bracelet any day Very user friendly design
I had a gilt dial 1675, faded bezel vintage GMT and none of the modern iterations are better in my opinion. I passed the opportunity to buy the new ceramic version at retail.
Bought my GMT 16700 1997 £2050 wore it every day until I sent back to Rolex for a service 2011 they replaced the bracelet ,fitted new ceramic bezel and winder mechanism total cost £1560 watch came back looking like a new the Rolex customer care lady asked if it as my every day watch which I confirmed worn it every day since.
I use my GMT watches dual time zone function daily. That’s why I have them. I guess I’m the exception. I’m struck by how often I hear people say that their GMT watch isn’t working properly or the GMT hand runs slow. I will admit that I am guilty of making this same mistake when I got my first GMT watch. I’m very glad that I figured it out on my own, and not in front of others, as that is a bit embarrassing. Lol
What is the meaning/point of the 'Master' part of the name? Why not just call it a Rolex GMT? Same goes for the Yacht 'Master'. Although a 'Rolex Yacht' does sound a bit stupid.
I wanna make a bet that majority of those who purchase the pepsi are Americans. That red, white and blue. I know only Americans who love it. Can that be true?
The more i learn about rlx it is like sugar cartel in my country how can someone be willing to spend money on such company??? Of course the watch is great but how they do their business is sketchy.
I agree , my 16710 Coke No Holes case I can’t believe that prices have continued to increase even now . One watch I would never sell . I love my 16710 😊
I have a feeling that Rolex tried to make a red and blue ceramic look good/expensive. The clomages micro brand manage to make a vibrant red blue ceramic by 2020 (San Martin and Cronos) and it doesn't look that good being that vibrant and straightforward of a colour imho
I remember a time when T&H videos had chapters. Those were better times.
I actually prefer this method because they stay in topic.
@@Thabosshoss I haven't noticed any difference in that regard myself, and I'm assuming that the video was just divided into chapters while editing. So the main difference to me is that it's a bit more of a hazzle to skip past their commercial that has been spliced into a hundred videos before already.
@@steffenaarsnes8066 I’m an expert commercial skipper so not a problem for me 😏. But I understand. Will see what they run with moving forward.
@@Thabosshoss Haha! 😜
I couldn't commit to all the minutes. I skipped through, but still have no idea why owners are upset. Would also like better organization!
It's not that Rolex specifically has problems with the color red, red absorbs more high energy photons which damage the pigment more easily. You see this on cars, flags, toys or anything else with red color.
I lucked out in 2013 when I purchased a pepsi 16710 from 2007 for £3,800 - I only found out a few years ago it is a transitional watch that runs the same movement they put in the 6 digit. Solid build, durable, updated movement (for then) but the slimmer proportions of the 5 digit. It also carries a different dial with serif minute markers and slightly different font. A watch I will always keep, to me the perfect gmt.
Sounds like a sweet & somewhat rare piece.
Good job.
yes, it was late Z-series or M-series years of production with 3186 (with Parachrom) movement. Mine was bought in 2012 :) Still a keeper.
Why are owners upset? I watched the entire video and didn’t understand the title of the video. Thanks!
I didn’t either. All I took away was the need to flex the white gold GMT which is $20k more and “jangles” less on the basis it is a heavier metal when in reality it has a few more links removed for a tighter fit.
Ya, this channel has gotten worse
Technically the new beats it in every area. I love vintage, but I’m of a certain age. Same with anything vintage really, could be a watch, car, house etc… etc…. The Morden will out perform it in every area. You buy vintage with your heart not your head.
I bought my 2002 16710 Coke pre-owned in 2003 for £1,900 (around $2,500), Wore it every day for eight years without a thought or care until the prices started going nuts and it actually became too valuable as a daily beater (thieves know the value). So now it sits in a safe quietly appreciating. The first successful investment I ever had for something that was never nought as an investment,
I picked up a BLNR on oyster from my AD 3 weeks ago - I am far from upset lol. I literally blew up my collection and sold all my other watches in rotation to rebuild around the BLNR. The GMTII will be my daily from here on out. Have a couple other pieces lined up from my AD, also Rolex models. The GMT is far more comfortable than the Sub on the wrist, flatter case back and nearly 1mm thinner.
What did you have before that? I just got one and I feel the same way too but I still love my seamaster
That's how I felt when I got my BLNR from the AD 2 years ago. I had the Sub before and the OP41 green afterwards. I just only picked up the sprite Monday from the same AD after 2 years. But the BLNR had the most wrist time out of the collection. Sub basically doesn't see the day of light.
Steel Rolex as investment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Pure madness🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Lot of mad people in this world🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I think some of the opinions from you guys are conflict of interest. always saying, vintage is better than Modern in which you guys specialize in selling older watches. 😮. Of course we all have our own pinions, and we should respect it.
Neo-vintage is the best of both worlds. I have the 16610 sub. The perfect case size, aluminum bezel, 904 steel, sapphire, better movement, still waterproof with no worries and tritium hour markers. I personally love the bracelet on older Rolex just because it’s so light and comfortable to wear daily.
Completely agree, but thou shalt have drilled lugs and tritium!!
@@andrewgiblin3468 oh that’s right mine has drilled lugs too!! I swear this model has everything that was great about vintage Rolex and everything great about modern Rolex.
I agree I have a 14060m Rolex Submariner. It's an absolute delight to wear. As far as I'm concerned the 14060m and the 16610 were the last of the best Rolex Submariners. The new Submariner's don't have the cool factor like the pre ceramics
I like green Lume ~
Better movement ??????
Really like your channel and the content you guys are putting out. My own personal watch is a Zodiac GMT.. I call it my Zodiac Diet Pepsi.
Didn't Christian recently get the whitegold blue dial? The modern one? So confused...
No. He has the whit gold with black dial, which is super rare
Quirks and features. Harnessing your Doug Demuro.
Like many, I want the old sleek case with a modern movement, ceramic bezel, and jubilee bracelet. Just what Rolex will never offer.
I found the super case noticeably larger on the Sub 114060 I owned vs the 14060 I had. However, I don’t find the super case obnoxious on my BLNR. It just feels like a very well built, substantial watch. The side profile still has those gorgeous Rolex sport case lines.
I second this
If you want to walk into a restaurant and no one to notice you don‘t wear a Rolex in the first place. It doesn‘t matter if it‘s white gold.
wonder if the white gold, black dial pepsi will become a future classic due to the short production run and that many dials have been changed out with blue dials??
I bought a 3 month old 16710 for £2,050 in 2003. The previous owner bought it with a black bezel since he really wanted a Submariner. I wanted the black and red bezel and had one fitted. It’s only an insert. That’s why I can’t understand this obsession with Pepsi etc. It takes less than a minute to swap them.
I’d rather have the updated Rolex watches. The vintage are cool, but having updated bracelets and movements turn my key. :)
I am not upset. But I think the policy is very bad. I had the great fortune to order a jubilee band for my 126710BLRO in addition to the Oyster later and now I swap bands - depending on my gusto.
What annoys me more is the quality. I have had to have the SL renewed on a tudor bb48 and a 16710 because not enough was applied to the hands.
but: i have that again on the hand of my new blro - but what rolex about it? wow, that's normal and in the tollerances. amazing that it's in the tollerances to see gray fields in the dots or in the hands with the naked eye.
this experience and also the often arrogant manner of the salesmen have made me to be enthusiastic about other brands.
I owned a 5513 that was minty, but was too delicate (compared to modern Subs). I sold it in 2016 and bought a Hulk. No matter what the vintage tool watches were intended to do when new, they just don't hold up to a careless lifestyle. Acrylic crystals, stamped bracelets, etc. can't hold a candle to new Subs.
True, but the 4 digits are way more delicate than the 5 digits. While the 6 digit models of today are even sturdier, the neo vintage 5 digit models sort of scratch the vintage itch while still performing well and not running the risk of getting damaged easily.
If the 5512/5513 hadn’t exploded in price, i might still want one. But now I’m more tempted to get a 14060m as a compromise. Still, i do lust for that matte dial and acrylic crystal.
I get a kick over you guys nitpicking on old watches. I personally wouldn't pay over 3k for a new watch but then I'm way too practical.
Gmt is way cooler then the Submariner
"The Submariner was introduced in 1953 as a tool's watch" 2:16. Freudian slip?
I like the color of the aluminum bezel much more.
16750, the perfect compromise between classicism and modernity (quickset, water resistant…)
I love the pre ceramic Rolex Submariners and GMTs. I also own a Submariner 14060m. The wearability on the pre ceramics are phenomenal 👌 a pre ceramic Pepsi is next on the list. Not really a fan of the current GMTs. The pre ceramics have a serious cool factor and all the hallmarks of the OG GMTs
Great video guys. Also, the latest 16710’s also got a click spring upgrade making the bezel rotation equally smooth in both directions.
Neo-vintage is a terrible term. Surely we can come up with something better to describe 20 year old watches! 🤣
Apparently the reason for the variance in bezels: most other brands up to that point would use separate solid halves of a ceramic bezel insert, or simply paint over it. Rolex uses a more expensive and more durable method using one single ceramic insert and a high-pressure chemical process called sintering to create the second color before the platinum inlays are set - the second color (red) is infused with the base color (blue) throughout one half of the insert on a molecular level, and it took them a few tries to get the exact composition right, tweaking various shades of blue and red. Red + Blue = Purple.
Enjoyed the video but I gotta ask anyone got a name on Christian's shirt? Looks dope
Where is that green sweater from
Regarding the sizing, back then they also came out with a huge watch in the yacht master 2. They tweaked the gmt but did dabble also in ridiculously large sizes
“The Rolex submariner was introduced as a tools watch” quote that
Because I'm a watch guy, I quite enjoyed this.
But at the same time, I'm able to stand back and realise that it's also a whole load of meaningless jawing about things of absolutely no importance whatsoever to 99.999999999999999% of the world's population.
What a strange hobby.
I have the 16710 Coke, absolutely love it. 33yrs later and it’s still looks like new. Last servicing I switched out the coke bezel for an all black. IMO, the all black bezel looks real classy.
The ceramic Pepsi bezel colors are not nice. The blue looks more like purple, and the red lacks richness, nothing at all like the colors found on the aluminum bezels. Just compare the blue colors between old and new at 16:35
Amazing video, very interesting hearing those parts of history. Please make a video like this on Daydates and which era you think is a smarter take. That would be awesome. Keep it up!
Preach
B/B 16710 here with over 4000 days of wear, a few hundreds were in subtropical jungles.
Lasted longer than my marriage and with less damages and …uh… misunderstanding, lol.
A true tool watches that can be used for bartering too.
I have 4 GMT Master II’s.
16760 Coke Fat Lady, 16710 Coke, 126710BLNR (Batman) and the 126711CHNR (Root Beer)
To be 100% honest I love my 16710 Coke and it is the most comfortable and easy to wear.
I hope in the near future Rolex Re Releases the Ceramic Coke GMT II.
That would be an amazing modern GMT Master II .
The proportions of the non supercase models are way better. If Rolex released a new GMT master 2 with the same proportions of the older models, it would be pretty much the perfect watch
You guys have been making a lot of Rolex video lately. Can you please make a video about any other brand?
Sry, but what happened to the intro? It was so catchy before, please bring it back!
126719blro if ppl wanna know.
First with black dial then to blue.
But the Meteorite dial is also under the same reference.
But the full name would be 126719-001/002/003
Like my YM 126621-001. Brown.
But 126719blro everyone will understand if u remember the model number
Sorry, in the video you say they added the laser etched crown at 6' on the 16710? I'm a bit confused.
Michael's hair looks like it been given the 'there's something about Mary" treatment
Probably given that treatment by Christian
@@omar10213245 yeah!
Rolex watches are falling for several reasons. For years Rolex has used Tudor as its cat paw! It has manipulated Rolex prices by artificial watch shortages and offering a cheaper watch.
Rolex has raised its watches prices by bait and switch. There is no reason for their inflated prices. In my opinion, it is simple rip-off. In the past Rolex watches were sold in many jewlery
stores. The middle class were capable of buying them. Rolex makes a decent watch. I owned one in the 1980's. But I object to their business methods. So I wear Omega watches.
Omega is not perfect but in my opinion, it beats Rolex not only in value but their business practices are more in agreement with mine. I am starting to think the public is waking up on Rolex.
Rolex is an overinflated balloon. I believe their watch line is stale and way overpriced. If people start switching brands Rolex prices could fall like a rock. There are many other quality watch
companies. It is insane for the demand for a Rolex diving watch. It is completely illogical. A field watch or a GMT is believable.
I like how the shirt is red and blue like a gmt….. nice touch…don’t know if you did this on purpose…. But I think you did. I like it.
Rolex pretty much just did the same to the 100 anniversary white gold Daytona correct ?
So why are GMT=II owners upset? => it is because Rolex sucker punched its own white gold GMT Pepsi black-dial owners by releasing the exact same watch in stainless steel, thus removing the message to white gold owners that they get something in perceived exclusivity for that extra $20,000 you have to pay for it. What does one get when upgrading from steel to white gold Rolex? Stealth Wealth became became as a new money tire blow-out. Rolex messed up. Rolex owes these customers something. I don't know what, but they owe them.
I'm gonna miss the old intro!
Modern Rolexes are the ultimate best , definitely not into watches that does not age with me I like to be the first wearing my timepieces
Hi guys. Please could you review the Yatch Matser someday. Both steel and bimetal. Thanks
Amazing video on the GMT, definitely a grail, value prop, timepiece versatile in any collection. Even a 1 watch collection.
@Theo and Harris Christian, what brand is your polo? Good Soprano vibes.
The exaggerated and fake drama on these watch videos is unreal. Kudos for the flamboyant performance!!🤣😂🤣
Although I had doubts about buying a replica watch, gussl dispelled my doubts. The watch has an authentic look and feel.
Neo vintage is king, subs, Explorers and GMTs!!!
Quirks and features? Did Christian just pull a Doug DeMuro? 😂
Yes!!!! You got it!!! No one else did. So happy Lolol
@@TheoandHarris 😂
GMT is a jewelry watch which are loved by many watch investors. As a watch collector not an investor, I do not recommend any GMT as the usability is limited. To keep away from being noticeable by people, a low profile black Explorer 2 or a black bezel yacht master may be a better choice. The yacht master has the bazel to keep track of time passed.
Nobody cares what you recommend
lol the usability is limited? not for people who work in multiple timezones like myself.
Most useful complication for me.
If you work across time zones, (especially if there is an AM/PM changes and inconsistent Summer time) it is a life saver.
Doing the math is much harder when you are jet lagged from travel. Also, on super long travel days, my phone has run out of juice, or I cant find a charger. The watch has saved me.
Even if you didn’t need the GMT function I still don’t see how it’s usability is limited when compared to the Explorer 2 or Yachtmaster. Neither of those watches has more features. The GMT technically still lets you keep track of time passed with the bezel, like the YM and Sub would.
I am at a loss as to why you say the useablility of a GMT watch is limited - to me it is the single most useable functional addition to a tool watch.
Love the intro, but I think I like the music from the other one better 😶🌫️
Well, of course I went and grabbed my GMT and put it on after I watched this
I wish Christian would tell us why he likes square space so much
Because they're putting dollars into his pocket, that's why
@Yorkiepoocharlie thank you Yorkie lol
Fully agree about sub being farther away from its origins.
The build quality on the Master 2 is so much better the colour POPS. the old one well some things are better left in the past.
What year and model is the vintage GMT that he is wearing?
Great video overall, thanks. Now stop flashing the glare of the watch into the camera. Look at the watch thru the monitor instead of from your point of view ;)
New intro today😮
I was an ink formulation chemist for years and still work as an engineer in the printing industry. Red and any shade there of are the most challenging colors for stability and permanence. I am not surprised by this challenge that Rolex is having. Even red cars can be more expensive than other colors.
What happened to "i don't understand" 🎶
I have a 16613 as my daily and my 16710 Coke that is in near perfect condition. I bought it from a the original owner and a collector who may have worn it 25 times since 2001. I love my GMT. More importantly I love that Rolex has not rereleased a Coke. Makes mine even more special to me.
2001 coke is probably the best looking watch ever released by Rolex.
Neo vintage is the way to go. My daily watch is my Omega Speedmaster Schumacher 3518.50. Still feel solid on the wrist. But has that great smaller presence that I like in the neo vintage. Next watch will be a Rolex Sub 14060M 2 line.
I just sold my 14060 2-liner. I've gotten to a point where I just prefer more heft on the wrist
@omar10213245 i understand, I have a Sinn U1 when i need heft on the wrist
Nice video guys
My mid 90s Pepsi GMT Master, because of the less slab sidedness than the ceramic Sub is actually lighter to wear and also more scratch resistant than either my Sub or pre ceramic Daytona
I’ll take that older bracelet any day
Very user friendly design
I had a gilt dial 1675, faded bezel vintage GMT and none of the modern iterations are better in my opinion. I passed the opportunity to buy the new ceramic version at retail.
You passed on free money in that case
Really tired of hearing about the Rolex "Pepsi."
Bought my GMT 16700 1997 £2050 wore it every day until I sent back to Rolex for a service 2011 they replaced the bracelet ,fitted new ceramic bezel and winder mechanism total cost £1560 watch came back looking like a new the Rolex customer care lady asked if it as my every day watch which I confirmed worn it every day since.
I use my GMT watches dual time zone function daily. That’s why I have them. I guess I’m the exception. I’m struck by how often I hear people say that their GMT watch isn’t working properly or the GMT hand runs slow. I will admit that I am guilty of making this same mistake when I got my first GMT watch. I’m very glad that I figured it out on my own, and not in front of others, as that is a bit embarrassing.
Lol
Rolex is a great Watch no doubt but the prices are so ridiculous. I remember when you could buy them for $2000 a GMT it’s just a Watch guys.
Philip Patek disagrees
This guy looks like George Costanza's dad.
Is it me, or does this dude look like a young Frank Costanza?
"A tool's wa--" I see what you did there
👊🏼🖖
Can someone TLDR me why GMT owners are "upset"?
What is the meaning/point of the 'Master' part of the name? Why not just call it a Rolex GMT? Same goes for the Yacht 'Master'. Although a 'Rolex Yacht' does sound a bit stupid.
I wanna make a bet that majority of those who purchase the pepsi are Americans. That red, white and blue. I know only Americans who love it. Can that be true?
Why should I be upset ? With my rare white gold pepsi😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lmao the title was changed thrice.
I go crazy wit dem titles bb
The more i learn about rlx it is like sugar cartel in my country how can someone be willing to spend money on such company??? Of course the watch is great but how they do their business is sketchy.
Hahahahaha I laughed when I saw the little quote underneath saying "I don't know a single person who regularly uses their GMT function"
what‘s radioactive about Bakelite?!
Can you please obtain and review the Dennis Rodman Rolex GMT nicknamed the Bad Boy? And then give it to me for free? Thank you
Oh I thought the GMT was an aviator watch and not a sports watch! With the first GMT nicknamed "Pussy Galore"
I really hate that "bleed out" red look on vintage gmt
As someone who has the 16710, I have to agree
I agree , my 16710 Coke No Holes case I can’t believe that prices have continued to increase even now . One watch I would never sell .
I love my 16710 😊
I have a feeling that Rolex tried to make a red and blue ceramic look good/expensive. The clomages micro brand manage to make a vibrant red blue ceramic by 2020 (San Martin and Cronos) and it doesn't look that good being that vibrant and straightforward of a colour imho
Great content. It would be great to have shortened versions. ❤
Really not keen on the purple/magenta hues of the new Pepsi… I’m out. Batgirl for the win!
👍🇬🇧
I have a Coke from 2000! Love the watch !! Owned it for 23 years!!
Thank you, Hans Wilsdorf!!!!
I wish Rolex would go back to those original dimensions. I’m not a fan of the thick lugs and bulky case.
You guys discuss topics that are close steely irrelevant to me and yet, here I am every video 🤷🏼♂️