ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024
- Display der Yakovlev Yak-3 UM und der Supermarine Spitfire Mk XVI auf dem Oltimer Fliegertreffen Hahnweide 2016 am Samstag, den 10.06.2016.
Start beider Maschinen gefolgt vom gemeinsamen Display. Landung der Spitfire und dann das Einzeldisplay der YAK-3.
The YAK3 WAS the tightest turning and best low altitude performing aircraft of WW2. It also seemed to retain it energy. It was loved by pilots and the ground crews.
With the outbreak of the war, it became clear that the main air battles take place at low and medium altitudes, at which the MiG-3's maneuverability deteriorated sharply. As a result, in the air battles in the summer and autumn of 1941, the units armed with these aircraft suffered huge losses, and the model was soon discontinued. The remaining copies were transferred to air defense units, where the aircraft was successfully used as a high-altitude interceptor and a night fighter.
i dont mean to be so off topic but does anybody know of a tool to get back into an instagram account??
I somehow lost the login password. I appreciate any help you can offer me.
@Cannon Gavin Instablaster ;)
There’s no way the Yak would turn tighter than a Spit or a Zero
Normandie-Nieman choice.
One note for Yak-3 team - absolutely fabulous to see it flying and thank you for restoring that great piece of history. However on Soviet planes all shut down enemy aircrafts were marked with small red stars, no swastikas, emphasizing the insignia of the winner.
Wrong, there was the "Normandie-Niemen" regiment, which consisted of french pilots and soviet mechanics. The pilots, following their air force's tradition, marked shot down enemies with the enemies' marks.
Although this exact paintjob is a complete mess. It combines the arrow/lighting of 303 IAD with the personal emblem of 303rd IAD's commander (Zakharov) and french victory marks ("N-N" was assigned to 303 IAD, hence the same bolt on the sides of their fighters). The star on the nose is a personal touch of some other soviet Yak ace, although he is from a completely different unit.
If the paintjob was to depict "Normandie-Niemen", it should've had its nose painted the colours of the french flag instead of the red star, lightnings on both sides.
Instead of an emblem there should be a simple number (usually 4 or 6, as these are pretty common on the photos, and 6 was the plane of the best N-N ace Marcel Albert).
No "guard" symbol/order under the exhaust pipes too, as it was only drawn at the vehicles of Guard units, yet it wasn't necessary and only at pilot's choice.
@@MDzmitry He said ‘all _Soviet_ planes’. Normandie Niemen might have been flying with the Red Air Force but they were French, after all.
@@thethirdman225 By my logic it's Soviet planes, flown in the Soviet airforce and serviced by Soviet ground crews
But flown by the French
So in my book it's an example of a Soviet plane (fighter) with victories marked by Balkenkreuze or swastikas
@@MDzmitry In some forces, the victory belongs to the aircraft. In others, including the French, I suspect, it belongs to the pilot. This has been the cause of confusion in a lo of cases, regarding claims (look up the American assessments of one 'Col Toon or Tomb during the Vietnam war).
I'm not saying you're wrong but I do think it's not quite as clear cut as you say.
😁😁 Both are winners, both shine at their intended use. No choice but to take you hat off for both! Nuff said!
People, really? Really are there so many keyborad warriors, who want to fight over comparing two planes 80 years old fighting on the same side, and each of them constructed for little different purposes (as there is any universal fighter in the world). And all this below the video of air enthusiasts flying friendly side by side? Why wasting so much time in that?
yep
who won battle of Britain?
idiot
@@luvhungryman germany would if goering wasnt the luftwaffe chief
with the original Klimov the Yak was a dogfighter par excellence, Luftwaffe pilots were ordered to avoid combat with any Yak fighter missing the under nose oil cooler (trademark of the Yak 3) below 5000m (approx 16000 ft). The famed Normandie-Niemen Regiment (Group de Chasse 3) were offered a choice of all available allied allied aircraft, they chose Yak 3 when it became available and scored the last 99 of their 273 victories with this type
Do you know why there is no klimov Engine available anymore
Wow that was so awesome, actually i am so very interested about the story of the French airmen regiment in the Soviet air corps during the war.
Klimov engines are available.VK-105PF and VK-107.
В этих старых машинах своя красота!
И как же охуенно звучит рёв их моторов, когда они мимо пролетают. О-о да, детка!))) 1:40
Заметили, какой маленький як в сравнении со спитом?
@@КонстантинФеренс-Сороцкий теперь понятно почему у советов был более маленький боекомплект в пушках ,попробуй туда больше запихни )))
@@fresconle7939 У советов были истребители разных классов.
1.Як - легкий, прототипом которого был спортивный самолет.
2.Ла - средний, более крупный более тяжелый и с большим боезапасом.
3.МиГ - высотный.
Последний перестали выпускать потому что двигатели понадобились для Ил-2
@@alexZhk Not quite so, high-altitude MIGs did not stop producing, they simply took into account the behavior strategy of the German aces and, accordingly, stopped the mass production of these high-altitude interceptors. There were simply no more goals for them.
Почему у нас такие выступления не проводят? Так красиво!
Как много ребят ты знаеш, у которых есть 15,000,000 построить токой самолёт, садержать ево по 1,500,000 в год. и ещё иметь такой большой интерес в самолётах которым уже 80лет
@@vladislavfeldman6562 Согласен, но всё же хочется, что бы такие люди и показы были👍
@@vladislavfeldman6562 ну конечно, 15 лямов, не знаю как спидфайерт, а такие самолёты как як3 в войну колхозники (!) покупали на трудодни и передавали полюбившимся пилотам на фронт. Некоторые по 2 - 3 штуки даже! Так что не очень то они дорого и стоят
@@Redeemer2012 Ферапонт Головатов не был колхозник ом, а пасечником - единоличником.
Потому что буржуям российским это не нужно, а у народа денег нет, зато есть палки в колеса. Вообще есть одна организация, восстановившая аж целых одын ил-2, миг-3 и и-16, все есть на Ютуб канале ил-2 штурмовик
Як-3 Красавец всегда он мне нравился и нравиться . 💕👍
*нравицца
@Omar Khurshid
I was being sarcastic about his weird spelling.
@Omar Khurshid
He's not a good source to learn Russian, trust me on that.
@Omar Khurshid
Not really apart usual ways of learning any new language - dictionary, videos, music and any printed or online material, plus obviously trying to speak it. Russian language is complex though, good luck studying it!
@@Phoenix_cataclysm_in_2040 Вы правы! Никто из иностранцев не поймёт, что говорит русский человек. В этом и проблемы!
Spitfire or Yak? Why not both?
Yak slightly better looking imho;)
@@johanb.7869 I agree.
@Gen Vuelham My personal favorite is the P51D Mustang.
@Zyphervern what? The P51 is slightly *bigger* than a spitfire lol
@@johanb.7869have you seen the spitfire mk 24?
I love these elegant timeless design of 1940's.
Love the Spitty.The shape of the wing is beautiful and the sound of the engine fantastic!
Thanks for watching and your comment
Поршневые самолёты как будто имеют душу. Прекрасные машины. Приятно видеть их в небе.
In the USSR, after the war, people thought about how to forget the war and how to catch the wounds that she left; everyone was busy recovering plants, factories, bridges, roads, cities and villages. Still it was necessary to think and give away all the forces so that a new war would not have fallen on the country, already with nuclear weapons. And so everyone forgot that it would be nice to save weapons of the Second World War. Just all the swords are turned to the hammer and sickle ...
Nicely said- thanks
Да, и советские самолеты летают где угодно, но только не у нас. Досадно. Все к чертям на слом :(
@@КонстантинФеренс-Сороцкий А как вы представляете сохранение авиапарка старых самолетов с СССР? Не было частной авиации, старые самолеты в большинстве было не возможно использовать в ДОСААФ, музеев было мало, самолеты разбросанные по разным аэродромам быстро превратились в утиль. Если бы допустим "ишачки" кто то периодически держал бы в летном состоянии, то регулярно кто то бы обязательно на них разбивался поэтому никто не рисковал держать их у себя. Так что не нужно ныть. Эти старые самолеты стоили бы сотен молодых жизней и все это понимали.
Махач Султанов сохранение парка старых самолетов я слабо себе представляю, но мне не кажется, что оставить определенное количество единиц самолётов-ветеранов каждой модели было прямо таки невозможно. Молодых жизней это не стоило бы точно ни одной, просто потому, что где вы видели, что б за управление старой военной техникой пускали молодежь? Это всегда пилоты с большим опытом, вот хоть на этом видео. У нас какое-то время назад группа энтузиастов восстановили по старым чертежам ряд военных самолётов: и-16, миг-3 и ил-2. И летают на них исключительно летчики-испытатели с колоссальным опытом, и никтл пока не разбился, хотя времени с момента постройки прошло солидно
@@КонстантинФеренс-Сороцкий Я ведь написал что музеев мало, многие самолеты установленны были на постаменты где и сгнили благополучно.
Boy, the Spit looked like it had a harry, bouncy takeoff compared to the Yak. Never understood the logic in designing that narrow, spindly, splayed landing gear the Spitfire and Bf-109 had. Should have just designed the wing to accept a decent landing gear like almost everyone else did. I do not envy the boys who had to deal with the Spit and 109's landing gear on unimproved runways under combat conditions.
True thanks Commenting
dyer2cycle In a word; strength. The undercarriage was attached to the strongest part of the airframe. That meant all the heavy components could be concentrated in the centreline, which helps with balance and moment issues. There was an added reason in the case of the Bf109; the aircraft was pulled through the factory on its undercarriage before the wings were attached. Messerschmitt did everything he could to keep the wings as light as possible. All aircraft designs have trade offs.
Germans and Brits were like:
Huh! If you suck you can't fly it lol
One in 55 does not seem like more to me. Where do you get your information, or just an armchair guess?
@soaringtractor You just can't stop running off at the mouth and spoiling every video with Brit aircraft in it.
You must have a serious inferiority complex which you make worse because everyone hates you so much including your own people. What a loser.
Spitfire with so narrow landing gear must be very difficult to land, almost like Me-109. Is it even safe on grass fields?
The Spitfire was renowned for being a nimble and skinny plane, yet the Yak-3 is clearly smaller in cross section.
Часто пишут-лучше ,,Спитфайр,, ,,,Мустанг,, и т.д.Есть один недостаток у машин с крыльевым расположением оружия-дистанция сведения.Например 400м,на этом расстоянии все пули в одну точку.Если цель дальше или ближе-большая часть очереди не поразит цель.
It does reduce the risk of showing your propeller. Many Yaks and Fw190s crashed because the system that timed the guns to not hit the prop failed
Spit looks good on the ground and awkward(ish) in flight. Yak looks great both on the ground and in the air.
Thanks Greg for watching and your comment
Spit looks majestic
I notice a lot of sailplanes at this field. The Gemans sure do love their gliders.
Yes they do
Was talking to some Reno Racer types about the Yak Clark Y airfoil. They have several Yaks modified with BIG engines and all the power in the world cannot overcome the ultimate high drag and hence the built in Speed Barrier of 400 mph ...!!!
The only aircraft I’ve seen that does a better display than the Yak is a Hawker Sea Fury. This display was pretty sedate. And it looked like it was at half throttle to stay in formation with the Spitfire.
Little brother still thundering around the sky love the bass Olin the sound
Close call, it will come down to pilot skill. Fast landings. Great video
la5 fn my favorite plane one ? tho what was that at 3:10 flying at super high speed horizontally any one know just curious
Noticeably little power in the standard Allison engine, compared to Klimov engine.
It’s a merlin
Both incorrect. The Klimov only put out about 1,200 hp, which was very low for the period and a byproduct of an old design.
The engine in the Yak is an Allison and I believe it’s in the 1,400-1,500 hp range.
If we talk about the best fighters of the USSR in World War II, then this is not a MIG-3. Rather, it is the Yak-9, La-5 and La-7.
Ла-5 ФН, Як-3. Ла-7 был создан уже в конце войны
Yak 9 was the most 💪
Yak-3 and Spitfire must be really good planes
I like my girlfriend like I like my yaks beautiful
Thanks watching
Спасибо за труд!
Both aircraft are very effective and I think almost equal in performance. The Spit is larger and might climb out better because of wing design. Both are 100%hot and deadly in the right hands. Two great planes any way you look at it.
Maybe you enjoy subtitles from the german speaker ?
I think the Yak is superior. The radiator uses the Meredith Effect Like the P51 so it has a bit of jet propulsion. It has an Allison engine. I wonder what dash number?
Not better than a Yak 3. Read up on the Meredith effect.
Then of course there was never fighting. As it was said to once. "If they wantcha they gotta come down to getcha." The French pilots that flew both proffered the Yak.
69/5000
bha really under the 5000 there were the Macchi 205 and the Mitsubishi A6M
Good restores all round.👍
give me both
Летчик на Як молодец, показал что может самолёт и за что его любили!
Awesome..loved it....Steve.
Thanks Steve
yak 3 best
Duk Dux yeah it may not be the best fighter but I still love the yak3
was best in ww2 ,best engine best aerodinamic,armament too
Duk Dux wow
Radminas go vov
Duk Dux too much war thunder eh?
Saw the radial engined Yak trainer, loved the tapered ++++ wing. Performance vs G loading. Speed always wins.
Well not really, then germany would have won Battle of Britain with their faster BF109
Оба красивые. Поинтересовался - они и стоили примерно одинаково: стоимость Спитфайра £12,604 = 269473руб (Курс 1940 £1=21,38руб.), ЯК 3 - 250000руб. Хотя деньги, конечно, не главное.
Wow, awesome, the Spit is always so revered, but the Yak 3 is an amazing machine, beautiful,,,ps, the Yak 3 entered the ww2 theatre late, but could kick everythings arse , with the exception of ME262. and probably gave that a fright or two, from my understanding the Yak3 was the fastest prop fighter of ww2 ! Correct me if I'm wrong,,,
+Shane ORegan i think would loose at higher altitude
Not true, a YAK-3 had no chance against a FW 190D-9 or a TA 152 H.
Yak-3 is a modification of the yak-1 figter, that was created in late 30-th
@@MrCrossbiker Not much point making that comparison. The later Focke Wulfs were used on the western front so it’s unlikely they ever met. In any case, the Germans put out a communique advising pilots not to engage the Yak with the large radiator underneath and no chin radiator.
The biggest problem with the Yak was the engine. But Alexander Yakovlev was a ver clever designer and managed to get exceptional performance out of a low power engine. Pilots who fly them today say they have no vices, compared to other high performance types.
What is the spitfire with the Czech flag under the cabin?
Maybe Shot a zlin 😜
You have very bad information....
Sehr wendig die YAK!
the YAK looks so small , bet it could turn fast at low altitude?
its faster at low altitudes
Love that yak 3 and it sure can turn good wide under carriage to love the spitfire to.
Yak -3 was optimized for low altitude combat where it was a very capable and formidable opponent. If your going to compare it to a Spitfire then you need to compare a LF version Spitfire. The Yak's handling has been described as being comparable to a early model Sptifire.
If you compare a Yak-3 and a Sptfire MkXIV LF its going to come down to pilot skill.
Yes and no. The Yak was limited by its engine. The Klimov was basically a Hispano Suiza Y from the 1920s and was out of date by the standards of the Merlin. It had the induction and exhaust on the same side of the cylinder bank and I think it was only a 2 valve engine. The Soviet superchargers weren’t up to much either, so altitude performance was always going to be limited. At the end of the war, the Klimov was putting out about 1,200 hp, compared to the Merlin at about 1,700. Yakovlev compensated with a very small airframe.
Anyone know if the Yak had its original engine?
+MotoMarios the owner tunes the engine like every year.
No. This is an Allison engine.
Hmmm I guess the Spitfire had to land first, so the Yak 3 could show off it's fantastic manouverbility and speed at this low "air show altitude" alone, without ridiculing the Spitfire. In the height the Spitfire most likely excells over the Yak 3 - but audience wouldn't be able to see it. Just some thoughts...
Thanks commenting
soaringtractor
Shitfire lol, haven't heard that one before. LF Shitfire doesn't stand a chance against the YAK 3 at low altitude, so it doesn't change my idea, it only makes it even more possible that they wouldn't allow the Shitfire to be ridiculed by the superior Yak, should the Yak guy start to play games. But I admit to You that I didn't know a lot about the XVI model being LF, so I looked it up. OK it is more or less a variant of the IV with another engine. Thanks. But it still couldn't do harm to the Yak at LF. Maybe not even higher up...
soaringfactor
Yes I read all that after seeing Ur first reply to me. I know there are tonnes of different variants of the fighters they used in WW2, the Germans also had endless variants of FW 190 for eaxample; I know the main ones, 190 A2 - A3 - A4 - A6 (my favorite, the A6) A8. Of course the shitfires had tonnes of variants too, not so much of a Spit err shitfire fan here, so know mainly MK2, MKV and MK IX... Oh and sorry for the typo in my previous post; I wrote IV instead of IX...
Oh and I know about the Russki dislike of shitfire, but they mostly recieved DOWNGRADED MK Vs which were alleady outdated when they got them. Later they got some IXs, downgraded as well, and with European letters on the dials. Anyway, have a nice day, gotta EAT NOW...
soaringtractor, low fighter version of the Spit is 5,.. Shitfire !! Are you a luftwaffe vétéran ?!?
Both look amazing and both kicked our ass, preffer the yak though
Is the yak flying with the original engine?
No. This is an Allison.
Die Yak-3 hat ihre guten Flugeigenschaften aber nur in niedrigen Höhen , so bis 6000 Meter, darüber fielen die Flugleistungen dramatisch ab.
Ja das stimmt so . Danke für deinen Kommentar
Yak-3 BEAUTIFUL!
Mk. XIV? looks more like a Mk. IX to me, i'm pretty sure the fuse design was more slick on the XIV or my memory is bad and the design was changed in the XIVE
Hi the plane in the Video is the Spitfire G-MXVI Spitfire MK XVI owned and flown by Stephen Stead
Does this Yak have the original engine?
No
The engine is an Allison.
schöne Aufnahmen :-)
Why does the spitfire have a Czech symbol at the cab?
Many pilots from other countries flew with the RAF against the Nazis. Polish, Czech, Canadian, Australian to name a few.
The Spitfire floats on air, the other seem to struggle
yes the yak is a low altitude fighter
I see little difference, both are great at the intended goal
The Yak seemed to be throttled way back to stay in formation. It’s a fast little aeroplane and does spectacular displays.
Я восхищён!
Well we're all friends now, eh?
yes
According to Brexiteers - UK is at war with the EU now.
@@Phoenix_cataclysm_in_2040 You comparing a peaceful, democratic political decision to a dictator-led war that killed millions of people. With respect that is moronic!
Both Good Planes But I think The Spit had it on Power. Maybe I am wrong but Yak seems to have a better Roll Rate
Betrer roll rate and turning at low altitude. The Spitfire with and without Supercharger comes into its own at Altitude.
Generally all the Soviet Fighters were better at low altitude and had better turn rates at lower altitudes. Less horsepower with easier to maintain engines flying from rough strips close to the Front Line.
Probably the reason many of the Spitfires they received were kept back in reserve protecting Cities etc. back from the Front Line where it was easier to maintain the Merlin.
As I understand it they developed tactics to bring say the BF109 down to them. In flights of say 4 they would go into a circle formation and could out- manoeuvre the AXIS Fighters at lower altitude.
You can almost see it in this demo. The Spitfire at low altitude would probably not be able to stay on the tail of the Yak if it went into a tight turn.
At altitude the Spitfire would have the advantage.
I’ve seen both displayed.the Yak is fast and always looks faster than the Spitfire. The only display aircraft I like better that the Yak is the Hawker Sea Fury and that wins on all points.
В эскадрилье Нормандиен Неман пилоты отмечали свои победы на удивление крестами, а не звездами. Исторический факт.
If the Spitfire was a sportscar, the Yak would be a racing car... The Yak looks small compared to the Spit, and they're not exactly huge.
Both works of mechanical art... Thanks for the upload
312. Czechoslovak sqn 🇨🇿❤️
What is Spitfire translated to German?
Spritzenfeuer?
Spucktfeuer
Thanks so much... I am hopeless at foreign languages but German would be my choice if I did eventually learn one
Oh God, how small is Yak compared with spitfire. Of course! The constructors were forced to reduce the weight and the sizes because of the weak engine
Exactly.
Yak 3s👌💪💪💪💪
These videos saying X versus Y Aircraft of WWII really do not show them Dog Fighting or much of anything! Some show Specs on each plane and then some civilian pilot does a takeoff and a few low-level flybys and then lands! The video is then over! Never telling you which plane was better!
That was the show
@@Warbirds I know that! It's obvious this was an AIr Show.
Классно.
war auch da :)
war super
до 4000-5000 метров лучше Як.... выше 5000 метров лучше Спит....
Если только это не Як-3 с двигателем ВК-107, он до 8 тыс. потягаться может даже с спитфайром "гриффон".)
че блять в тундру наигрался олень сука.....
Не путай хер с пальцем. Лакированными гробами называли ЛАГГ.
Спитфайр средние высоты держит, а Як малые.
а мессер хуже?)
Yak can flow a ring about Spitfire or Messershmidt. It was a war machine.
I would prefer Yak over Spitfire Lol
Красиво
i would have to say the Yak is a better plane
Thanks for your comment
Not in a turn fight
Yak wouldn’t have fared very well against Experienced pilots flying spitfires ! superior climb performance at any altitude above 10,000 feet plus more fire power. The yak is a great plane but limited in flight envelope due to its engine
Like nummer 100
"Number"
Son comparaciones ridículas el spitfire desarrollaba 420 klm/h y el yak 3 670 klm/h sólo ese dato lo hace infinitamente superior el avión soviético
Thanks watching and commenting
Historical nonsense.
The Spitfire is in the marking of the W/Cdr Tomáš Vybíral the leader of the Czechoslovak Fighter wing. Czechoslovak wing has not been equipped with Spitfire MkXVI... only with MkIXc/e.
There should be a Fw190 and Bf109 show on the german sky!
Both Machines didn't show up this year. The Me 109 has been damaged shortly before the show and the FW190 did not show up to another reason i cant remember.
Joseph.
The Spitfire Mk XVI is a Spitfire Mk IX, the only difference is the fitting of a Rolls Royce Merlin 266 instead of a Rolls Royce Merlin 66, everything else was exactly the same.
Latter were all shot down.
Well they shot down more aircraft than any other
I agree, the difference is the Packard Merlin. But Czechoslovak fighter squadrons never been equiped with Mk XVI.
Подняты из болот и востановленные И-16 , Як -3 .Як -3 отдельная история . . th-cam.com/video/2j7N8XGR-z0/w-d-xo.html
It's Czech pilot of spitfire :)
Yak was a low level intercepter made for dog fighting at ground level... thats where they were fast... were not designed as a long range ,high altitude escort...!!! Hence much smaller and lighter than contemporary fighters...!!! With those dinkie little 29 ft span ,Clark Y airfoil wings worked great in cold thick dense air...!!! Like the P40 that flew great at lower altitudes and Cold Buffalo NY winters , when asked to compete with a Zero at tropical ,humid low density air masses it became a dog...!!!
Thanks for explaining and watching Alexander !
I believe the P-40 made 200 aces and 20 of them double aced in the old P-40. In every front. The P-40 was a unsung hero in my opinion 🇺🇸
Spitfire is the best
@soaringtractor Lolo mo
Yak is better, no doubt. Maybe Royal is faster but who cares in real fight.
So speed doesnt matter in ''real fight'' ?
Lovely planes both, but I'll take a Corsair.
ШВАКи не дамажат!
I have read that it did , indeed , suffer at, Altitude, BUT!! with a Gunner at the rear of the Canopy ! , - and the the fact that this thing went like a spray of shit !' would you fly up behind it ????
Dont compere just enjoy😀
I'm waiting for someone to say the Yak would out turn the Spit, cuz I know it's coming...of course, it can't...
we all know the spitfire is the best plane ever produced!
Hehe
Dream on.
Yak savety Landing important to
Пилоту некайф садиться было.
Yak looks better (in my opinion)
Хоть бы раз реальный учебный бой провели с экстреальным маневрированием а не простые полёты вместе. Соперники то настолько равные что очень интересно
Что бы убиться в азарте? Поди не война! Да и ресурс машины при маневрировании на грани уменьшается в двое. Машины не новые, по кружили и достаточно.
@@ЕвгенийМонастырский-ь4ф пусть с ограничениями на форсаж и перегрузку, но чтоб был элемент соревнования.
Очень так себе посадочка у обоих
One fighter is defifnitely smaller
Both are great - but there is only one Dog Fighter the Spitfire.
not true paul. the yak can turn circles inside a spit and climb and accelerate faster, a low altitudes, as well. both are great planes and combat success against me 109s and fw 190s depended upon the quality of the pilot.
cockdog.
The Yak can turn circles inside the Spitfire?
Really where did you dream that up? As for climb or accelerate the Yak in 1945 when it limited entered service was much slower with poor acceleration and climb compared to the Spitfire Mk XIV which entered service in late 1943. Lucky for the Yak pilots the Luftwaffe no longer had quality or quantity of pilots.
what's with the insults barffie rodlicker?.... ya f**n goof....you've swallowed too much goop.
cocodog85
What insults poor fool, your poor brain seems to be slow, just as you make up lies about the Yak compared to the far better Spitfire, you dream up insults
more insults barffie?...if you apologize rodlicker i'll engage you in a discussion...until then stop swallowing that goop and switch over to the other side.
The best is Lavochkin-7
Just one thing... Prototype of Spitfire MK I - 1937. Prototype of Jak 1 - 1940 (Jak 1M - 1944). Soooo maybe Jak 3 is better on low altitude, but still years behind Spitfire :P
>Years behind
Forward*
@Urban Student Prepper Are u serious? :D
The limitations of the Yak were due to its engine.
Мессер и Фокер таки лучше были . если посмотреть САХ от центра тяжести все станет на свои места . Невозможно получить больший управляющий момент прижав вектор к центру тяжести . Недаром все учебники по аэродинамике немецкие .
они были лучше на начало войны, пока не стали обвешиваться различными модификациями пока совсем не раскабанели
бред
сужение крыла не поменялось , мощность мотора возросла , профиль крыла яковлев и антонов слизали с мессера .
Немцы все сохранили
Didn't quite catch the "versus" part. Also, I hate the German commentator so much in the background.
Gaijin fix the fucking BR!!... Oh wait :"v
B
Yak-3 is better