What if Ukraine Goes Nuclear?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- Hi Guys. Working on this one for a bit. Had some issues in production but got them sorted.
Special thank you to our sponsor Atlas VPN, Click here to take advantage of their deal.
get.atlasvpn.c...
also donate to the Ukraine Defence Fund
www.ukrainedefencefund.org
Special thank you to our sponsor Atlas VPN, Click here to take advantage of their deal.
get.atlasvpn.com/Animarchy
Say Animarchy how do you feel about looking at the fallout universe?
I had no idea you were on the spectrum! That's really cool, actually. Speaking as a fellow person on the Spectrum.
Hey Man just asking Enterprise Vid
WHEN WILL IT BE DONE
I think this was oversimplification how nuclear war would happen . A tactical nuke being used by Russia doesn’t mean most of west nuclear weapons get launched at Russia . Another possiblity is conventional weapons being used against Russia tactical nuclear weapons bases or storage stock piles
@@TheEDFLegacy you get bullied a lot?
Imagine if Ukrainian tractors stole a road side launch system
Last i checked Finland's tractors are getting ready to do just that.
@@davidty2006 it's a short drive over the border😎🤙
@@davidty2006 I'm pretty sure some gangs in Finland already did that at some point
I wouldn't be surprised
Imagine if the Russians ran out of AK 47s ...oh
@@devinohanlon5501 they haven't (yet)
They still have rusty and moldy ones in storage lol
I suspect even in a nuclear wasteland sunflowers will still bloom .
O it will bloom just without us
they would be radioactive tho
Then there will still be me amd the fuck sunflowers gang killing the sunflowers
Can love bloom on a desolate wasteland?
@@arklados3596 would rather fist fight a nuclear bomb
I hate how disgustingly plausible your NW scenario is. From the use of FSB to false flag with a nuclear briefcase, to Russia being the first to escalate and launch after failing horribly in Ukraine. I hate all of it, thank you for making me paranoid & wanting to prep
I don't buy however that the US would assume Russia would not be in a state of extreme readiness after the Russians deploy a nuclear weapon on NATO. A pre-preemptive strike doesn't work when Russia makes the first move.
Sorry but why would Russia escalate?
If they (or anyone else for that matter) launch one (1) nuke there are 2 options :
Opt 1 they are nuked by everyone, even their ally could do, since I think one of the best metods to not be nuked by an ostile power is to say " hey, that dude was an ally, but I never thought that he was so stupid, so look that even I am against nuking someone else by nuking him. Please don't nuke me"
Opt 2 nobody responds by revenge nuking, so every single state (that want to be someone) will start a nuclear program to protect himself; now Congo (an example of a nation that isn't the more stable)has nukes, are you happy? No, because there will be nukes used in every war and civilwar; hope that no country in Africa lose a nuke to some terrorist group that has a problem with your state (or a state near you). And you can't use the treat "if you develop nukes I will invade you" because if you don't you will be at the mercy of everyone else.
@@federicor227 Desperate people do stupid shit. A 'nam / Afghan grade stalemate in Ukraine, draining Russia of resources as sanctions ctrl-del the economy might just make Putin crack and slip up.
@@federicor227 Yeah, I'm with you on this one.
@@federicor227 Yep, it's a lose lose situation. Wouldn't put it past Putin though.
I’m sorry as much as you see Ronald Reagan as the “Alpha POTUS” the only truly Alpha POTUS as well as certified Giga Chad can only be number 26 Teddy Roosevelt
I thought Teddy was the spirit of America distilled into a singular bad ass
@@avroarchitect1793 well yeah hence the Alpha POTUS and Giga Chad status
Too bad bad his economics plan was so shit that it only served to eradicate to the middle class.
Teddy transcends Alpha POTUS status, he is the Ultra Chad POTUS.
Gotta hand it to Reagan a bit though. Dude would tell Soviet Russia jokes to Gorbachev and make him laugh
Absolutely amazing video, Animarchy. I have not seen anything close to being this detailed or analytical regarding the use of tactical or strategic nuclear weapons in the current conflict in the mainstream or anywhere yet.
Is it sad I have have seen almost all of the nuclear weapon deployment and test videos? Yes, the atomic tests channel is my guilty pleasure…
I love his videos when I just started watching videos and I'm about the conflict that's going on with Ukraine I love how he reports it😂😂 this overlaid and him hyping me up about Ronald Reagan that was hilarious
_The UN being useless as always_ -- completly belivable, i rate it 5/7 :P
I only found the lack of Red Alerts Hellmarch during the total russian mobilization a bit disturbing. Great video as always :)
Doesn't Hell March have a guy issuing orders in German?
@@Edax_Royeaux It's Canadian standard orders, actually, someone found the original sample.
Heavy Newfoundland accent there, thus making it sound German.
There is only one way how to do diplomacy - with overwhelming power. Be it economic, or military, or whatever. Expecting different nations with different agendas and goals to just agree with each other is crazy just by itself, let alone when you mix in crazy dictators...
@@pavelslama5543 The Thirteen Colonies was able to establish diplomatic relations with the Dutch and gather large loans, trade agreements and to establish credit without the need for overwhelming power. Mutual benefit is the easiest way to forge diplomatic relations.
@@Edax_Royeaux That is the rare option, which is not always available.
A manga recommendation, for those who want to read up on the aftermath of nuclear warfare: Barefoot Gen. It is about a boy who survived WW2, and his home happened to be one of the places that was struck by nuclear fire. This is effectively an autobiography, as the author lived through the calamity.
Another good anime recommendation about a Cold Wars gone Hot scenario and it's fallout is Future War 198X
If intelligent life is suicidal to the point of causing its planetary extinction at least we'd know why we don't see our solar neighbors stopping in to borrow some sugar, it's because they decided they'd rather piss in the office coffee pot than make sure others can have a cup too
I mean, I feel like a lot of nuclear apocalypse scenarios forget that the southern hemisphere exists, and also over-value how long nuclear winter conditions will last. Most reputable models suggest that sunlight blocking would last a few months, at most, and radiation levels would fall to a "safe" level (still highly increased chance of cancer, but you'd be able to live your life) in 3-6 weeks. The initial death tally losses, but I'd imagine the likes of Australia and most of South America would come out /mostly/ okay, as the majority of such are politically stable, net-exporters of crops. Various states in the Midwestern USA would likely come out politically intact and be self sufficient, as well, due to low population density, established governments with clear lines of succession, and again, being resource self-sufficient for the most part. There would be a decided time of difficulty, but I think such establishments, and at least some form of the USA would come out the other end of the nuclear war. In a bit of irony, as for Europe, I'm fairly sure the Balkan nations are the most likely to survive as intact political bodies, alongside Iberia, though I'm not sure how they would handle the subsequent refugee crisis that would follow such a scenario. Various southeast Asian nations would survive as well in such a scenario, as would India. It's really less "end of the world" and more "End of the current world order."
How well NATO comes out of it al;so depends on just how well the Russian Nuclear arsenal works. Nukes are fantastically expensive weapons to maintain. And they have to be maintained, otherwise the nuclear material in them will degrade into not being able to cause a nuclear detonation. The US spends 60 billion a year maintaining the arsenal of about 4000. That's Russia's entire military budget and they have a bigger stockpile. Given just how badly Russia has cut corners with its regular military it would not shock me if a significant portion of that stockpile has degraded into is uselessness, if not the vast majority of it, leading to a scenario where dud nuclear warheads smash into some random buildings in many NATO Cities. And that's providing some Russian general didn't sell off the nuclear material in many of the warheads and replaced it with sand or something equally absurd.
What has also helped compared to older nuclear scenario's is that warhead sizes have shrunk as weapon accuracy has increased, leading to the big multi megaton warheads being slowly phased out.
You can see in the video the estimated fallout of radiation and how much the sun would be blocked for both hemispheres. The northern hemisphere is basically fucked.
In the southern hemisphere the sun would be 30% blocked for weeks, enough to badly damage the agriculture. The radiation would still reach it and cause damage and maybe interdiction zones. They would not be "fine" but maybe they would survive. The population would decrease slowly until food production could reach it since almost all the south hemisphere imports food.
So yeah, if you fear nuclear warfare you should emigrate to South Africa, South America or Australia (if not targeted by China) and prepare crops that don't need a lot of sun nor water... that's the hard part.
@@ClemDiamond south America is mostly fine, as the southern countries of that continent is a net food exporter, and is the native source of potatoes, which can deal with reduced sunlight conditions quite well.
Australia has more problems, but still is near enough to self sufficient that while there would be some dieoff in the opening years, it could support a reasonable population.
Idk man a total global nuclear war would release more ash than the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs - and that winter lasted for years. I think our estimates tend to be too conservative.
@@Lucas-df4ht No? Or rather to be more accurate, even if all the nukes were ground-impact, even if such caused more ash to be created, it would not be to the elevation that the meteor that wiped out the dinosaurs, and there's more than ash that it kicked up into the atmosphere, total particulate and particulate hang-time in atmosphere are well on the meteor's favor here. You need to remember that a lot of particulate got stuck in low-earth orbit from the meteor in question, and particulate from nukes doesn't tend to reach that high. Especially from the lower-yield nukes that make up the majority of those in use today. (usually in the 0.5-5MT range, with China being on the high end with 10MT warheads as their standard)
And most nukes are set up to be airburst, to cause wider blast and radiation damage, rather than focusing on the fireball. But airburst nukes cause a tiny fraction of the ash and particulate creation in comparison to ground impact estimates that are usually cited when trying to inflate nuclear winter concerns.
This really hit hard, but nonetheless thanks for the video. Unexpectedly I’m a bit calmer now, seeing that i live close to some larger cities in Germany and probably would just die in the blast.
Fortunately if a blast hits your city, most of the deadly radiation will be gone after about a week or two since a lot of the nukes are air bursts. It’s a different story if you live near airbases and missile silos. They’ll get hit by ground bursts.
*me living in-between two naval bases, x1 airforce base, and x1 marine/naval base* Hehehehhe I'm in danger.
This brings "here comes the sun" to a whole new level.
As a currently serving soldier this video was haunting and extremely well done. It terrifies me to see us entering a second cold war and seeing how fast things can go down hill. I remember my PSG asking me what I'd do if we got word like 100% nukes were in the air. I looked ant him and told him I'd shoot myself; no point in living in a post nuclear war world and at that point any hope I have in humanity would be gone no point to go on.
This whole video I was like if one nuke gets launched. It would be easier with a bullet in the head.
What about doing your duty and doing your best to protect civilians to the end?
Yea protect what is left . Putin bluffing .
@@matydrum the civilians who will either get blown to smithereens or die a slow, agonising death due to radiation poisoning or hunger? There is no duty when there is no humanity left. If the nukes go out, we cease to be worthy of any good.
@@matydrum dude, at that point, you can’t do much besides wait for the touchdown
I feel the need to point out that TLAM-Ns are officially decommissioned. Victim of one of the STARTs, I believe, so nuclear cruise missile strikes on the BLUFOR side - if any - would likely be AGM-158-A/B JASSM and -C LRASMs as well as the French ALCMs.
Additionally, the global dimming hypothesis/"nuclear winter" has been disputed by more recent simulations.
I thought "The Day After" was the worst depiction of nuclear war. I was wrong. "Threads" left me shellshocked.
When The Wind Blows was jarring enough.
The Day After is the hardest you can get on commercialized US television (and they didn't even have any commercial slots after the nukes blew!), but Threads didn't had that limit. Even featured an F-bomb. When The Wind Blows, IMO, emotionally hits the hardest, especially as it focuses on an older couple who survived the Blitz and don't fully understand that pluck and stiff upper lips are poor shields against gamma radiation.
Eventually, Ivan will just fill the river with enough of his destroyed bridging vehicles and try to cross on top of those.
I'm only 5 minutes in, but I love the shout out to Perun and your self-deprecating jokes about your job/degree. Anyway, I'll continue watching now but wanted to comment for the algorithm. Thanks for your videos!
Love the inclusion of Fallout content, plus the nod to Dr. Stragelove!
This is a video where i rreally don't want a
"This didnt age well"
Comment.
up date on Ukraine that will make you laugh, Russia busted out the T62s
25:00
Russians: Ivan, was blowing bridge part of Battle Plan?
Ukrainians: _Always has been_
If anyone wants more information on nukes I recommend hypotheticalhistory’s video on the subject.
If there is any saving grace for this scenario the US and Russia only have 1/10th of their Peak stockpile. With most being the tactical nukes. Thankfully Nuclear Radiation from bombs has a half life of 2 days. Also Russia is not exactly known for PMing their weapons considering the 60% failure rate of conventional missiles in Ukraine. Not something I want to test though.
Another saving grace is that nuclear war apparently won't plunge us into another ice age, although temperatures will drop enough to disrupt agriculture. Apparently recent models done show that the dust nuclear war can kick up doesn't compare to something like Toba the Yellowstone Supervolcano...
It's still pretty scary that we're relying on enough Russian nukes not working and/or Putin retaining just enough sanity to not launch his nukes.
All it takes for nukes to hit an active nuclear power plant and breach their reactor cores...
Where do you get your information from? Nuclear Radiation lasts for millennia. Go away and study Alpha, Beta and Gamma Radiations.
are you realy discuss abaut use nukes in the name of some nations?
Western Nuclear Reactors are built like a fortress you need a bunker buster to punch directly inside and explode to do any real damage. The old RBMK reactors still operating in Russia however…
Your video is chilling. It is incredibly well done, the World War 3 scenario. And with recent events, I believe it more and more that this could very well be in our future. The only thing that could possibly prevent this is that cooler heads prevail.
But if the world ends here? Well, we had a good run anyway.
This war of the worlds style stuff is pretty cool even has many in chat confused
I tend to cope by thinking of star trek and how the nuclear winter reversed global warming and ten ears after the end of WWIII a dude in montana figures out how to travel faster than light and makes first contact with the Vulcans
"And suddenly, in a lightless world, the sun rose again..."
"when defecation collides with oscillation". 🤣 Best thing I ever heard. I love your goofy dry comedy bro. Aloha from Hawaii 🤙🏼
Son: What's going on Papa.
Papa: Nothing much son, the Old Farts are dying along with their World Order.
Excellent video. The first half was a great combination of documentary and dark humor; but the second half is exceptional. Got some Tom Clancy vibes there. Extremely well presented and eye opening to how close we may be to the seemingly inevitable once more.
One thing that you forgot to mention in your weapons description are MIRV, abbreviation of Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicle, any of several nuclear warheads carried on the front end, or “bus,” of a ballistic missile. Each MIRV allows separately targeted nuclear warheads to be sent on their independent ways after the main propulsion stages of the missile launch have shut down. Thus a "force multiplier" in that one missile can deliver multiple warheads to several different targets.
At 62 years old, I remember the Cold War, duck and cover drills, and Civil Defense signs on buildings. The younger generations have no conception. Welcome to the New World.
It is all terribly frightening and all too possible of a reality.
We know. We just learnt to love to bomb because we know there's nothing we can do about it
So why worry.
You missed a trick with the outro song; Vera Lynn's "We'll Meet Again" would be the perfect reference to Kubrick's evergreen satire of the situation we now find ourselves in.
Edit: that aside, a very good video once again ❤
Do you think we will reach a point where nuclear weapons are not feasible? Like either we develop (somehow) something far worse, or we develop a counter measure or an extensive bunker system like the swiss, or and hopefully, we reach a point where they are discarded, and radioactive material is used for peace. Like power plants and what not
Yes.
The moment a world power Masters laser tech, nukes will become completely obsolete.
Ships equiped with them would be scattered all across the ocean, read to beam down any ICBM'S
Hell, even conventional systems inland could take down the warheads as they come back down, considering we already have the capability to track them.
When this happens, the country in question will let it's own arsenal fly, certain that It is safe from retaliation
@@darkmoon1289 Interesting. I have a feeling that we will never reach a point of full scale nuclear war. I do think Putin's lies will eventually catch up to him, whether that be by an angry mob of his people, or by the hands of his "allies"
Yup
Yep.
love the Hunt for Red October sound effect when the text captions rolled in...
also, am I the only one who thinks the visual of a nuclear explosion (particulary in slo-mo) has this most amazing irony for it is the most beautiful and the most terrifying thing a man can ever see.
Judging by how well the US intelligence knew Russian invasion plans it's safe to assume it's gonna know if there are any movements in that area
As completely messed up and dark as this topic is, I do love that Russians have an unbreakable infatuation with putting incredibly destructive rocket weapons on the backs of trucks.
Yeah I don't really trust Russian truck maintenance that much. Imagine if the speeder gets stuck or the breaks fail under transport. The US has had 32 broken arrow incidents. Imagine how many the soviets and Russia has had.
The Soviet Union didn't just collapse by accident. It collapsed due to mass corruption, constantly changing leadership, and financial failings(The irony). Reagan's renewed focus on Russia only hastened its fall, it was on the downward slop since the early 80's. Its actually impressive that the USSR collapsed without a final death wail(Nukes).
I was more referring to how the Berlin Wall came down and the collapse of the USSR in terms of the coup. Both situations went completely wrong and against the intentions of all involved. On both sides. They became leviathans that no one could actually control. Kind of a theme of the video.
@@AnimarchyHistory True, It just came so abruptly in the video. It was a little jarring. Granted so was the fall of the USSR, and the actual wall between the west & east.
As someone from Sheffield, Threads holds a special place in my heart. Honestly people telling you to watch it doesn't do it justice, it will leave you feeling somewhat hollow.
"Threads" The feelgood movie of the CENTURY!!! Always dig it out when im feeling a bit down to cheer myself up. Nothing like knowing that however bad your life is going just look on the Brightside...be thankful cos it can get a WHOLE LOT WORSE.
Threads is a psyop to make people commit suicide in the event of nuclear war.
One factor should be considered. Russian oligarch pilfered a large majority of their ACTIVE military assets. What would be the CURRENT state of their NUCLEAR arsenal (which everyone knows there won't be a Russia to hold them responsible for stealing IF those need to be used). If Putin is not a fool he KNOWS that an attempted countervalue strike, that only ends up launching 50-60-70% of their missiles succesfully, will still entail a full on US/NATO counterstrike. That COULD be the possible reason he's so blatantly threatening with nuclear war is probably him tactically playing on the wests' fears you detailed, to make sure noone will even dare call his bluff.
Our boomer elite making decision seems to forget the the USSR HAS FALLEN. Russia is NOT the USSR, it's a third world country that MADE a living peddling his raw material (that they cannot even extract themselves without western corprations), but has nowhere near the industrial capacity or manpower the USSR had. Also I recall an important fact about nukes that relates to this very fact: Nukes, as far as I remember, have a shelf life of about 10-15 years without maintenance. Meaning NONE of the soviet era nukes are operable at this point if they were not maintained, which is not even a distant possibility, seeing the current state of the modern ACTIVE armaments of the russian army
Also, it feels more and more Putin is using the western powers' fear of nuclear war to get WHATEVER he wants the same way a certain austrian Chaplin used the western powers' fear of another Great War to get whatever he wanted. And we are all 1939 France, waiting, hoping one country is enough for him.
Small correction: American policy oscillates between "we will only respond to nukes with nukes " and "we will respond to CBRN with CBRN... and we only posess one kind of CBRN."
We only posess one kind of CBRN _officially_
Nuclear war casualty estimates: 5 to 7.5 billion. Quick summary: worldwide fallout, nuclear winter, breakdown of the food chain, mass extinction and possible extinction of the human species.
Very long summary: Total nuclear exchange between belligerent powers could potentially involve in its entirety detonations in excess of 5k megatons (5 billion tons of TNT) over significant portions of the northern hemisphere. Initial death toll within 24 hours is estimated at 300-500 million with variances dependent on use of fallout shelters and evacuation procedures. Both atmospheric and surface level detonations are expected to produce a significant number of EMP (electromagnetic pulse) discharges at various ranges. These would render most electronic devices and power grids inoperable. This includes a majority of ground, aerial and marine transport. Follow on casualties from injuries such as severe burns, those trapped in collapsed buildings, patients with electronic medical devices such as pacemakers and others would account for a further 100-200 million deaths shortly thereafter. Past this point casualties would continue to increase as a further 400-700 million are expected to succumb to radiation poisoning and cancer in the proceeding weeks and months. A substantial number of these fatalities are expected outside the belligerent powers borders as radioactive particles are spread globally via atmospheric currents. The dispersion of radioactive material would mainly occur via a west to east wind-stream until forming a semi-uniform belt of particles primarily encircling the northern hemisphere from 30° to 60° latitude. Computer model predictions show lethal levels of atmospheric radiation lasting anywhere from a minimum of 3-5 years, upwards of 20-30 years in some scenarios.
Secondarily a nuclear winter may result as a consequence of runaway firestorms in both urban and rural areas. The injection of smoke and soot, particularly black carbon entering the upper atmosphere from the burning of petroleum fuels and plastics in destroyed cities is expected to lower global temperatures between 11C to 22C (52F TO 72F) for a period of 2-3 years under optimistic projections. With some modeling showing global temperatures being partially affected for several decades. The result of this drastic temperature change is expected to deplete global agricultural yields in excess of 80-90%. Potentially causing a further 4-6 billion global fatalities due to starvation. With the casualty variation being highly dependent on proper use of food stocks and rationing from the remaining populace. Several studies have also posited that the layer of ozone in the stratosphere that shields living things from much of the Sun’s harmful ultraviolet radiation might be severely damaged or depleted by large amounts of nitrogen oxides produced by thousands of congruent nuclear explosions.
Even without a nuclear winter; the overwhelming majority of industrial fertilizer, artificial non pollinating seeds and agricultural equipment manufacturing that is responsible for the consequential increase in crop yields of the past century, is located within the belligerent countries territories. Studies estimating planetary carrying capacity using preindustrial agricultural practices provide a range of 600-800 million as being sustainable in terms of a global population. Unfortunately released data from declassified belligerent parties war plans cite the destruction of fertile agricultural regions as a priority. And with the majority of global arable farmland located within the targeted northern hemisphere, planetary carrying capacity would be significantly reduced. With some modeling predicting a meager 200-300 million as being sustainable afterwards. Additionally the majority of pharmaceutical manufacturing for both antivirals and antibiotics, along with medical equipment is produced by the belligerent countries. Loss of these facilities would compound the spread of disease along with subsequent conditions. Further adding to the substantial number of unpredictable fatalities.
With the destruction of much of the northern hemisphere, global trade for all intents and purposes would cease to function. As all major air/sea ports, navigable rivers and rail/road ways within the belligerent states intersect continental economic zones that would now be impassable due to radioactive contamination and debris. Per UN food sustainability studies, between 58%-62% of countries are dependent on food imports. A further strain on food distribution would be the loss of major fuel refining facilities based within the belligerent countries. As 65% percent of refined fuels production originates from the belligerent nations. Fuel shortages would compound already strained food stocks, leading to a potential breakdown in local supply chains. Even within countries classified as food sustainable estimates put 70%-74% of populations further than 200km (a weeks travel by horse-cart) of their respective agricultural regions. As most produce is perishable within a few days without refrigeration this would create a hunger crisis for isolated population centers. In addition ocean fauna would also be dangerous to consume as rain/snow runoff funnels radioactive material along with debris containing large concentrations of lead and other heavy elements from destroyed cities and factories into coastal waters.
Under these conditions remaining governments would face a monumental task in attempting to maintain law and order. Possibly resulting in the breakdown of civil society and extreme lawlessness across the globe. Rate of homicides from confrontations over dwindling resources during this period can't be calculated with certainty but expected to be significant. Furthermore acts of cannibalism have been documented during prior historical crisis events involving food shortages and thus would undoubtably occur. It is outside the scope of this report to predict a time frame for the reemergence of organized civil society and or a return to stable population capacity.
Lastly even survivors who may have been fortunate enough to escape the destruction in underground bunkers will face extreme difficulty upon emerging onto the surface. As once food stocks are depleted they will have to grow crops in irradiated soil and likely without pollination. Most organic crops such as wheat, barley, corn, fruit and nut trees, etc., all require bee pollination. Bees have a particular sensory modality allowing them to detect electric fields. And thus they are especially susceptible to large amounts of electromagnetic radiation. The drastic temperature changes along with surface radiation may render them and most terrestrial animals extinct. Along with a significant portion of marine life. Final estimate for a total nuclear exchange is between 5 to 7.5 billion casualties. With a moderate chance of complete human extinction.
A strange game, the only winning move is not to play. -Joshua
I highly recommend a free movie on TH-cam: By Dawns Early Light. Fantastic example of many things shown in this video
Was gonna recommend it as well
Fallout IRL start 55 years early than the game
we still can do someting to avoid it.
@@theleninator5739 The best think we can do is send UN peacekeeping soldiers from non-block country to Ukraine that won't do anything at all
@@ahmadfaturrahman4240 wrong, the best think we can do is rebuild the international and point our guns against the capitalists
"All of them classified to hell and back" That was until Trump sold the documents, of course.
Trump did what is called a "pro gamer move" with those documents
I've been living with this nightmare since 1956, when I was old enough to begin grasping what WWIII would mean. I have never stopped being aware that, despite a seemingly relaxed period after the collapse of the USSR, the danger had gone away, lessened or had become more unlikely. Daniel Ellsberg's book "The Doomsday Machine" makes this abundantly clear. Prof. Noam Chomsky has been saying that nuclear annihilation and climate change are existential threats that cannot wait for solutions. The disposition and posture of the nuclear powers has not moved away from the edge they encountered some decades ago. And yet, governments and populations around the planet have parked their anxieties and have left everything simmering and threatening to boil over - whether by accidents (very, very narrowly averted in decades past) or prompted by geopolitical contests as in then current Ukrainian conflict. What fools we "imperfectly evolved mammals are" [Christoper Hitchens].
Well now I'm depressed. Amazing video!
I live in central England so I’m pretty sure I’d die instantly in the event of nuclear war. That’s not to bad
51:10 Set your clocks guys. If we make it, first round's on me, if not...well, it was nice knowing y'all.
If a full exchange were to happen because i do not have my own survival bunker I always wanted, I would simply calmly go to the pharmacy and politly steal liquid morphine and bid everyone i like farwell and then calmly inject a lethal amount and go to sleep :)
My city is right across the river from an airforce base, so I always assumed that it’d be pretty close to a blast if WW3 where to happen. So I simply say what Wargames said and think of it as nothing more than “A millisecond of brilliant light”
Watching this at the end of January 2023 has me a little worried right now.
Started watching this out of interest only to be smacked hard in the face by the sobering reality of war and its potential consequences. It is particularly chilling given that in the past 24 hrs Ukr aligned russian fighters crossed into Russia with US equipment & appear to as of the time of this video be holding territory within Belgorod oblasť.
12:25 After all that buildup you should've just had WowCrendor do his "Ronald Reagan" impersonation/namesay-accentkey.
As a veteran of the U.S. Army, I truly believed we had a chance in 1991!!!
Is it totally morbid that i fjnd myself whistling "When Johnny comes marching home" whenever I see American bombers in flight?
Mate, grew up near Hanford and close to a nerve gas depot during the Cold War. Much like David Warner's character in WarGames, I was happy to live close to two primary targets. If the world goes to hell, I'm first in line.
Same here. Grew up within 3 miles of RAF command, moved to within 5 miles of the UK's ULW transmitters - the ones used to talk to the UK's subs. Both priority Alpha Strike targets. I figure if it all goes pear shaped, I'm close enough that the first I'd know of it would be unexpectedly arriving in the great beyond...
This was a pretty cool video. Loved the lost footage type/ document type portrayal of how things would go down. Also even though you did not let 10mil linger on my screen for long, it felt pretty long. Almost screaming at me. Hopefully nothing of the same shall come to pass.
Reagan... I'll never get why people think he was a good president.
I'll never understand why dense Americans still think Trump was.
Come on now. You gotta bet that russia still has at least 1 tsar bomba kickin around in the back of some warehouse in the middle of nowhere. Probably bein used as a space heater during the cold russian winter.
This is a heavy vid. I have followed you. Don't know if I want to share this with friends. This is the worst case scenario that you have shared so far. I hope USA is not preemptive. Somehow this insanity must stop.
Those poor B-52s didn't even get a chance to get their new engines. Yeah, I, out of morbid curiosity, looked up where I'd be in relation to a likely target in South Carolina, and ill definitely be atomized. I thought SEATO was dissolved in '77. Great video as always.
I get the feeling. I live in a city in Atlantic Canada that has an air force base, and army base, a naval base with both warship and submarine repair facilities, oil storage facilities, cargo port facilities and government offices. My city is likely a target for a ground burst thermonuclear weapon. If there is no warning of an attack allowing time for me to evacuate, I have no hope of surviving such an event even in the short term.
My two main hopes are that such an event never comes to pass and if it does I hope that Russia forgets about my home just like my own Federal Government does.
I kept my word during the live premiere that I would come back and watch this on my free time, and I just did. Honestly, I was hoping "We Didn't Start The Fire" would be the outro song.
There's a little something called monetization, lol.
Greetings from January 2023. The Russian offensive has stalled and Ukraine is getting Patriot, Abrams, and Leopard 2s.
I thought about this video after that mass shooting in Moscow.
Ngl having watched this after hearing news of a big Russian event on the 24th, it does me a concern.
"I do not know what weapons will be used in WW3, but I know WW4 will be fought with sticks and rocks"-Albert Einstein
That's such a profound one, if you don't really think about it.
It's also rather uncertain, if Einstein actually ever said that.
I think the jump in the middle escalation wise is highly dubious. In general it's a well written scenario, but from an IR perspective, the Americans essentially declared war on Russia outright here. Chemical weapons attacks don't justify that. In general, it'd be completely out of character for an American foreign policy that while certainly more militant has a very healthy respect for escalation limitation.
Probably you just decided to skip over a half dozen middle steps of the sake of brevity, I guess.
I think you'd probably achieve a more realistic scenario by having chemical weapons fail to be effective. NATO establishing a red line that causes a direct confrontation might also be more plausible.
I just saw 5 or more of your videos pop up that I haven't seen before and I have intentionally looked for more of your vids since I started watching over a year ago. These video WERE NOT Available to me before today. Why is that happening?
Patrolling in the Mojave makes me wish for a nuclear winter
We won't go quietly. The legion can count on that!
It's always kind of jarring when you all of a sudden get hit with a random commercial/ad. Especially during a dramatic point in a video.
I just got this with REALLY upbeat music during the "IMPACT" segment of the video with the haunting and echoing music.
21:37
*Me living in a rural area
Me: HAAA jokes on you no one will care about me . . . (slowly cries in loneliness)
Animarchy I cannot belive an american plan literally called a SI-OP its too on the nose and im having conflicting thoughts if its actually real or some pentagon worker having a great time
t’s a shame that you think the wall came down by itself. The wall came down because of the absolute economic and political ruin of the Soviet Union accelerated by trying to keep pace with the west’s military capabilities
You’re welcome-
Love,
Ronnie ‘Ray-gun’ Reagan
A nuclear war would destroy all the cities in the targeted countries, maybe 50% fatalities in said nations. Many countries (Africa, South/central America) would remain untouched. The explosive force of nukes is actually relatively low, only a few km wide, and the fallout isn't as dangerous as you'd think (maybe equal to the explosion deaths). Now, a high-altitude dirty bomb or bioweapon, on the other hand...
Australian Wargamer/weeb:
"RedFor nukes have worse guidance systems so they have to aim for targets they can hit, like YOU"
Me:
"... did you just call me fat?"
Really becomes worth watching 30 minutes in and is seriously good from that point on. So good I don't even resent the adverts and the guy deserves to earn money from this video. Well done dude, damn good job, this video is as good as those produced by professional production companies.
I'm surprised you omitted President Carters surprisingly oversized role in reforming US Strategic Forces so that a Nuclear War could be waged as more than just hitting a button and that's it. Thanks to Carter US Strategic Command gained the ability to carry on a protracted conflict that would.last more than one exchange.
Regan's buildup and planning would not have happened without Carter's reforms.
It’s currently February 21st 2023. We’re just a few days until your mockumentary’s suggested deadline. NATO has delivered tanks to Ukraine, and is slowly warming up to giving long range ballistics and jets; the PRC and Iran have escalated their involvement in providing drones and other materiel to Russia. Putin has continued his rhetoric of threatening nuclear war, whilst Biden declared whilst speaking in Kyiv, amidst a tour of NATO nations and Eastern Europe that “a Russian victory is impossible, and will never happen”.
This should be an interesting week.
I'm Brazilian, there's no chance of a nuke hitting our nation. In the worst case, we will have to tolerate the gringos from the north during the nuclear winter.
Obviously making the darkest jokes humanity has ever produced.
When will we get news of the the anime Roulette channel?
"should dedication collide with oscillation" that's nice I'mma steal it
Welp. This might have aged like fine wine as of today….
Anyone who thinks this is a possibility needs to stop depriving their nation of their entire lead paint supply.
There are reports and photographs which confirm that the Russians are sending T-62 tanks (Yeah, T-62 tanks!) into Ukraine... This is a very interesting development to see as an early to mid cold war equipment enthusiast. We've even got Leopard 1 tanks about to be transferred to Ukraine from Germany!
For better or worse i always get a chill down my spine whenever i hear the emergency alert system buzz
Bold to assume half to 3/4 of russian ICBMS wouldn't just detonate on launch, or fail to launch entirely
FIRE ZE MISSILES will never not be funny
Now I’m no lyrical genius, but was “my wigwam” really the best rhyme they could come up with for “atom bomb?”
Bro’s hating
The music starting at 51:20, paired with the footage of the test blasts, was probably one of the most haunting viewing experiences of my life. I could actually feel tears of pure terror welling up. 😰
SOSUS
AMOGUS
Nuclear weapons: "I AM THE STORM THAT IS APPROOOOOOAAAAAAAAAACHIIIING!!!! PROVOOOOOOOOOOOOOKIIIIING!!! BLACK CLOUDS IN IIIISOOLAAAAAATIIOOOOOON!!"
13:09 it’s called supply side.. calling it trickle down is like calling the space defense initiative he also tried to peddle, star wars. It’s a fun name, but it’s not how it works at all, fair enough it didn’t work due to work arounds and incentives, but it was not as stupidly able to not working as described in press.
Bame human nature and reality.
I find it hilarious that the very same people who criticize communism for being a failed economic theory can be so blindly adherent to another failed economic theory...
@@Emanon... i'm surprised at both your assumptions and illiteracy. i never said i didn't support communism, your preconception immediately made you assume that i did from making a correction. and the other is that you thought i believe suppy side economics work, when i literally said they didn't.
look for a fight somewhere you don't tumble getting into the ring, my guy.
0:00 "Picture it!" "Salvation!" "the death of a million is a necessity!" - Captain Torres
uffff, had "Komm, susser tod" playing all the way through the simulation. Couldnt find a more fitting song
5:56 "strange game, the only winning move is play it" juan posada.
So.... Re-preparing for a nuclear disaster is again plausible...
Everybody should watch "The Day After" (1983). =)
That’s total warheads
Actual nuclear missiles /bbs is :
Russia = 1650
U.S - 1590
U.k - 250
France - 350
China - 300
Pakistan - 65
India - 60
Israel - 45
North Korea < 10
That opening picture looks just like Birmingham though. Imagine what it would look like AFTER the nukes... 🤭