I remember a video when Xander signed where a certain Padre fan said "it's a good time to be a Padre fan." Aged like milk. I think the 29 other teams were in shock because everyone knew that was a toxic contract. Then the Machado and Cronenworth extension, the Darvish extension. Siedler was the gift that kept on giving... to other teams. If the Padres didn't sign those contracts they might have been able to re-sign Soto. Those contract add up to more than 50 million per year, it's a possibility. The only way to get rid of Xander is to attach Merrill, Tatis, Salas and DeVries. Probably not happening but it's not like the Padres are going to re-sign Merrill, not with this ownership group. It would give the Padres a good start to a reset. You still have to get rid of Machado though. Maybe Steven Cohen will bail you out. If Xander keeps it up he may get his jersey retired at Dodger stadium.
@@erkbzr there was a time probably before your time when the Dodger organization used to grow their own. They've always had money but they always grew their own. Now it seems all their stars have been purchased. Even the prospects they have traded away haven't become anything for the other teams who received them. They've put out a lot of pitching but not much when it comes to position players. Good thing they have an endless amount of money otherwise they might be battling it out with the rest of us. I guess being a wealthy team because of your location and investors is a good thing when it comes to owning a baseball team. I wonder what would happen though if MLB was run like the NFL? Then the teams who actually did their homework the best would benefit the most instead of those who have the deepest pockets. There's no skill in that.
@@mike-vq8zw What players did the Padres "grow"? Merrill seems to be pretty good and came up through the Padres system, technically Tatis was traded for. Welcome to the new MLB. Will Smith, Kershaw, Beuhler, Seager, and Bellinger are not bad players, few MVPs in there. The reason why the Dodgers can trade for good players is because our farm system is always in the top 10. I guess for you it's bad when an owner invest in his team instead of pocketing the money. I think it's a great thing when management invest in their employees to put them in a position to succeed. If the Padres ownership can't afford to invest in their team, they should probably sell the team, just like any other business in America. So are you saying that San Diego is a bad location and you can't find investors? I think San Diego is great city, and if you can't find investors or invest yourself you have a bad business model. If you can't afford to be in business it's time to move on, it's capitalism. You can wonder all you want about the MLB being run like the NFL, but the reality is, it's not. Did the Padres do their homework when they spent around a billion dollars between 2022 and 2023 on Xander, Machado, Darvish, Musgrove, Cronenworth. Now those contracts look like anchors. Xander has 9 years left, Cronenworth has 6 years left, Darvish and Machado are going to be in their 40's when their contract is over, they didn't need to be extended them, especially for that much. That's why they can't afford Cease, Soto, or even Higoshioka. Everyone except the Padres knew Xanders contract was toxic, it sounds like the Padres didn't do their homework. The Dodgers have no players under contract into their 40's, not even Ohtani. I think we both can agree that the Rays are a small market team that do well by doing their homework, they have to, they have less money, so it can be done. Guess where Andrew Friedman came from? If you don't think the Dodgers do their homework, take a look their bullpen. You know that bullpen that shut the Padres down in game 4 and 5 of the NLDS, the one that won the World Series with a 3 man rotation. Their bullpen are all cast offs from other teams, Blake, Banda, Brasier, Phillips, etc. Justin Turner, Max Muncy and Chris Taylor(not good anymore but has been a meaningful player throughout his time with the Dodgers) were players that were castoffs. What players on the Padres are castoffs that are part of the Padres long term plans? Honest question. You can't infer that the Dodger don't develop their own players and then complain when they sign good players to favorable contracts. It's one or the other. If anything it's the Padres and Angels who don't do their homework, bad big league contracts with a bad farm system.
@@FredSamsonwouldn't you think they would keep him around just to hit fungos! Fly balls to the outfield ground balls to the infield, SOMETHING ? MAYBE DRAG THE INFIELD AND CLEAN THE BASES AT GAME TIME
@@xXIronSwanXx I wonder what we would do if Roki told us he’ll sign with is only if we get rid of AJ and have Peter’s widow run the team? Who would we choose?
@@glennsilverman522 Dylan isn't good enough to make another team want to deal with the contract with X. It would take Dylan, at least one of our two top prospects and throw in lots of cash to get that deal done. LOTS OF CASH
And that's only if the Padres don't ask for much in return. The whole plan behind it must be just to get rid of his contract and move on. Sometimes you just have to suck it up and pull the trigger.
LOL they will be listening foe a very long time. Padres would have to eat 180 million. He would struggle to get 3 years 50 million on the open market. Teo is currently only getting offers at 3 years 65 million and he is much better than Xander and the same age
Breaking News: Xander Bogaerts waves his full no trade clause and has been traded to the Athletics as the Athletics take on the full remainder of his contract and the Padres get Mason Miller.
In a couple of years Bogaerts contract might be the goin rate for an average player but he better start playing better than he has been because he's been below average. If a team is really interested in Cease and the Pads tell them they will take less in return if they take Bogaerts off our hands as well I think its a good move. Getting his deal off the books would free the team up to actually contend smartly for the next decade with Tatis and Merrill in their Primes. But as long as he is a Padre they have no chance of competing and its wasting two potential all time greats.
Preller has brought in talent and put fans in seats. Got to give him that. However, he’s also made some decisions that has constricted the team from being able to make immediate improvements. It’s no disrespect as I’ve never seen a perfect GM. Never been a GM however, if one takes a risk, it’s evident that the risk should be made with a means to get out of it or move a contract if things go south. Signing a player to a huge contract with a no trade clause is a huge risk. In order for the padres to move forward, they have to rectify the Bogaerts contract. He’s not playing up to a quarter of a billion dollar contract. It doesn’t seem like he’s happy here. You can see it from Machado and Tatis. They’re fired up and happy to be here. Bogaerts doesn’t. When you sign a player to that kind of money, they should no kidding change the trajectory of your franchise and be hypothetically almost the face of the franchise. In order for the Padres to be able to move forward , they have to move the Bogaerts contract. Signing a player to that kind of money says that that player is more important than extending other players and signing players for other positions in need.
They got into the playoffs with Bogaerts and the whole team choked in their final two games. He’s not the problem. The problem is Peter Seidler is gone and his estate wants to preserve its money. The only hope is to build the farm and not trade away top Padres prospects. Plus,fill gaps with second tier MLB players. Profar was a second tier player, also Higgy. Maybe that’s the Padres strength, player development.
No one wants X. The Padres would have to eat the majority of that contract and give up a prospect. Tatis is the only player any team would take but he's got getting moved. The only other piece is to move Machado and eat some of the deal and or trade Darvish.
The sad thing is even if Padres brought in a new GM tomorrow he would be strapped with the same problems AJ strapped himself with right now. No matter who the GM is, contracts are going to have to be eaten and top prospects will have to be attached with these bad decisions to get them out the door to start over. If I was off to this GM job it would only be under those conditions otherwise and new GM will simply be doing well just to tread water until he's fired for what AJ created.
@@redpillbrotherhood110 My home is next to the Santee dump, care to trade straight up? When the wind is right, there's no better place to be. I'll even throw in my broke down motorhome to seal the deal. No engine, no tires and no windows but it sleeps 4 comfortably. Just like the Padres, I'll do anything to get this deal done.
Wish list would be for Boston to take back Xander, they literally need a righty AB (hence Arenado rumors). Thats the only team that makes logical sense, especially considering his history. Maybe new Red Sox front office wants the nostalgia of ‘13 & 18’ back? Would take some Preller magic… maybe Cease is the guy you throw in? Also, trading Cease would thin out the pitching rotation, but if he goes to Baltimore they’re stocked up on good talent.
I can't see Baltimore taking on anchor contract. They are notoriously cheap and You're going to need to throw in more than 1 year of Cease and a prospect. I think Steve Cohen is your best bet, but that dude didn't his billions by throwing money away
@@AlanYeezyi don’t think I made myself clear. I meant that Cease goes to Baltimore. Not Xander. Xander goes to Boston. Baltimore could totally do another 1-year rental for an ace pitcher.
@@inalavalamp I see. Not a bad idea. Baltimore is loaded with young talent. You're probably not going to get for Cease what they gave up for Burns. Burns is better than Cease. However you definitely should get some solid potential back. Xander going back to Boston based on nostalgia is very unlikely. When you said "maybe Cease is a guy you throw in" it sounded like to Boston. I'm not trying to be combative but I think you're going to have to give the farm to Boston to take on 9 years of an anchor. From what I hear Boston is trying to compete right now so I don't know if prospects are really what they are after. That's why I thought Steve Cohen might be willing to take him on because he could careless about 9 years of 200 million. However he's not dumb either and he's going to want a lot in return.
@@AlanYeezyI think initially I meant “throw in Cease” with Xander as an incentive, before they got Garrett Crochet. Don’t know if they’d take Cease AND Xander now, considering the prospects Padres would want in return. But maybe Cease to Baltimore, for 2-3 top prospects, and Xander to Boston and throw in some money? I’m not GM but I know things can be worked out. Perhaps a prospect from Baltimore in a Cease trade, could then take the place of Salas, or be used to throw in with Xander.
@@inalavalamp I think you're a better GM than Preller. I'm a Dodger fan but I don't hate the Padres as a franchise but I think there front office is bad. I'm do tease them a little. The Dodgers need San Diego to be good. They don't win the World Series this year without the lessons learned from the Padres the pass few seasons. That's why I don't see an AL team winning for a WS for a while. Walk into the World Series but don't know what to do when sh... hits the fan. See Yankees 5th inning. lol. Hopefully the Padres get their ish together. When the Padres get there I'm sure they'll be able to take what happened this year and apply it to getting the monkey off their back.
Padres are listening? Most likely they are beging for other teams trade for him. They will have to eat around 60~70% of his contract to get rid of him. They are stuck with him lol
sasaki not signing wiith padres.. they sound like mess with GM out there trying to shop around half the team and trying to cut payroll.. why would a stud like sasaki wanna get involved with that mess?
@@Twicelovetwicelife you sound like a politician, that's always there go to solution 😁. Taxes in this state are ridiculous enough don't you think? How about bringing in someone who can manage a roster without overspending on the first six of that roster.
@ nah, politicians don’t use taxes effectively. I think using our taxes to pay off Bogaerts contract will be a better use than fixing the potholes that are never going to get filled
@Twicelovetwicelife do you think that 1% tax whatever go to the Padres? OF COURSE NOT THE ORGANIZATION JUST NEEDS TO BE MANAGED BETTER. PERIOD !! AND THE FANS NEED TO WAKE UP AND DEMAND BETTER. ALL THESE SELLOUTS AND INCREASE TICKET PRICES AND NOW WE'RE DOWNSIZING THE PAYROLL? QUITE A COINCIDENCE
When a Pobres pitcher has a good season, it has to be because of Niebla. When the pitcher doesn’t do well or regresses, it’s the pitchers own fault. We get it. No need to explain anymore. Niebla is Pitching God. He’s the best in MLB. You, Pobres fans that only pay attention to your own team, go off the stats where a pitcher improved and give credit to Niebla. You guys are the bandwagon fans.
I see no way the Padres can get rid of X this soft season without attaching one of the Padres top two prospects along with some cash to him. Even at that they won't get much in return. It will be a team that has money, doesn't care about X, likes the extra cash, but really likes the prospect. There aren't many teams like that around. The longer the Padres go holding on to X the less likely they are of getting rid of him . Padres are going to have to make a decision soon. Just succumb to the fact they are going to be straddled with the contract of X for years to come or admit they made an incredible mistake and because of it are going to have to include one of the top prospects in baseball to free themselves up and service this team in more positions. No way can this team do both. Can't have all these huge contracts that are going to look worse and worse as the years go by including X right now AND keep the two top prospects they have AND pay the going rate to be competitive. They have put themselves in an extremely bad position.
@redpillbrotherhood110 I think the Padres would rather keep De Vries. I'd take my chance on him making it over the catcher. It's just too bad they may have to make that choice just to dig themselves out of the hole they themselves dug . If they don't dump a couple of these contracts soon they will be a middle of the road team, never good enough to win it all but not bad enough to end up last. That's the worst.
@@redpillbrotherhood110 The worst is not knowing whether to go all in or dump it all and get out and start over. Every year they sit like this they will just be treading water. SHIT or get off the pot.
@@mike-vq8zw It's definitely time to pony up and make a decision. They should(but likely won't) do one of two options: 1)Operate in a loss for a year or two and go all in and break the luxury tax. This would be signing Corbin Burnes, trying to land Roki Sasaki, re-sign Kim and Solano and Tanner Scott then do one big trade, perhaps to get Casas and Wilyer Abreu or send De Vries, Salas and a pitcher to get Kyle Tucker and then extend him immediately as part of the consideration for the trade. They would arguably be the best team in baseball at this point. 2)They realize the budget issues without trying to rebuild and trade away Cease and either X or Cronenworth to get Casas, Abreu and Marcelo Mayer in return. Maybe add Kash Mayfield and another prospect to get it done. Then try to get Sasaki and fill out the rotation with 1-2 flyers towards the end of free agency. This wouldn't make the team great right now, but competitive while keeping budget same or a bit less. They get young, cheap MLB ready players under club control in Mayer, Casas and Abreu to add to the mix with Merrill, Salas, De Vries, maybe Sasaki, Tatis as a relatively good contract etc. They'd then have a young core for years to come to build around while being reasonably competitive now
@@redpillbrotherhood110 X is the sticking point. The only way you get rid of him is to add one or two big prospects, lots and lots of cash and then expect very little in return just so you can get on your way. The other bad contract is crony. Not so much the money but length of time. Seven long years and he's no young pup. To get rid of those two you can't expect much in return regardless of how much the Padres have to put in.
The Owner that spent the money passed away....The Padres are not gonna be making huge signings......they are gonna be cutting payroll!!......Padres are gonna be going back to that crappy team we all are used to!!
I remember a video when Xander signed where a certain Padre fan said "it's a good time to be a Padre fan." Aged like milk. I think the 29 other teams were in shock because everyone knew that was a toxic contract. Then the Machado and Cronenworth extension, the Darvish extension. Siedler was the gift that kept on giving... to other teams. If the Padres didn't sign those contracts they might have been able to re-sign Soto. Those contract add up to more than 50 million per year, it's a possibility. The only way to get rid of Xander is to attach Merrill, Tatis, Salas and DeVries. Probably not happening but it's not like the Padres are going to re-sign Merrill, not with this ownership group. It would give the Padres a good start to a reset. You still have to get rid of Machado though. Maybe Steven Cohen will bail you out. If Xander keeps it up he may get his jersey retired at Dodger stadium.
Its feast or famine with these dudes... We saw feast, now its time 4 them to experience Famine😈💙😈💙😈💙😈💙😈💙😈💙😈💙😈 Viva Los Dodgers
@@erkbzr Famine????? They haven't won a World Series in almost 60 years of existence. That's not a famine that's starvation.
Soto isn’t THAT good
@@erkbzr there was a time probably before your time when the Dodger organization used to grow their own. They've always had money but they always grew their own. Now it seems all their stars have been purchased. Even the prospects they have traded away haven't become anything for the other teams who received them. They've put out a lot of pitching but not much when it comes to position players. Good thing they have an endless amount of money otherwise they might be battling it out with the rest of us. I guess being a wealthy team because of your location and investors is a good thing when it comes to owning a baseball team. I wonder what would happen though if MLB was run like the NFL? Then the teams who actually did their homework the best would benefit the most instead of those who have the deepest pockets. There's no skill in that.
@@mike-vq8zw What players did the Padres "grow"? Merrill seems to be pretty good and came up through the Padres system, technically Tatis was traded for. Welcome to the new MLB. Will Smith, Kershaw, Beuhler, Seager, and Bellinger are not bad players, few MVPs in there. The reason why the Dodgers can trade for good players is because our farm system is always in the top 10. I guess for you it's bad when an owner invest in his team instead of pocketing the money. I think it's a great thing when management invest in their employees to put them in a position to succeed. If the Padres ownership can't afford to invest in their team, they should probably sell the team, just like any other business in America. So are you saying that San Diego is a bad location and you can't find investors? I think San Diego is great city, and if you can't find investors or invest yourself you have a bad business model. If you can't afford to be in business it's time to move on, it's capitalism. You can wonder all you want about the MLB being run like the NFL, but the reality is, it's not. Did the Padres do their homework when they spent around a billion dollars between 2022 and 2023 on Xander, Machado, Darvish, Musgrove, Cronenworth. Now those contracts look like anchors. Xander has 9 years left, Cronenworth has 6 years left, Darvish and Machado are going to be in their 40's when their contract is over, they didn't need to be extended them, especially for that much. That's why they can't afford Cease, Soto, or even Higoshioka. Everyone except the Padres knew Xanders contract was toxic, it sounds like the Padres didn't do their homework. The Dodgers have no players under contract into their 40's, not even Ohtani. I think we both can agree that the Rays are a small market team that do well by doing their homework, they have to, they have less money, so it can be done. Guess where Andrew Friedman came from? If you don't think the Dodgers do their homework, take a look their bullpen. You know that bullpen that shut the Padres down in game 4 and 5 of the NLDS, the one that won the World Series with a 3 man rotation. Their bullpen are all cast offs from other teams, Blake, Banda, Brasier, Phillips, etc. Justin Turner, Max Muncy and Chris Taylor(not good anymore but has been a meaningful player throughout his time with the Dodgers) were players that were castoffs. What players on the Padres are castoffs that are part of the Padres long term plans? Honest question. You can't infer that the Dodger don't develop their own players and then complain when they sign good players to favorable contracts. It's one or the other. If anything it's the Padres and Angels who don't do their homework, bad big league contracts with a bad farm system.
Speaking of Hosmer. We still gotta pay him 13 mil this year.. 😢
@@FredSamsonwouldn't you think they would keep him around just to hit fungos! Fly balls to the outfield ground balls to the infield, SOMETHING ?
MAYBE DRAG THE INFIELD AND CLEAN THE BASES AT GAME TIME
Xander getting traded is just as likely to happen as Ohtani not making the HoF. Which means it'll never happen
yea padres done fucked themselves with that bogaerts deal- dodgers fan
yea padres f'd themselves with that bogarts deal
@@kikos102 💯
What sucker out there would bite on Bogarts?
@@xXIronSwanXx I wonder what we would do if Roki told us he’ll sign with is only if we get rid of AJ and have Peter’s widow run the team? Who would we choose?
getting a team to take xander would be a godsend
Why would anyone take that on.
Nobody will that’s why it would be a godsend
Bogaerts hadn’t been healthy either, So give him dome Slack Jack !!! ☝🏽
I wonder what we would do if Roki told us he’ll sign with us only if we get rid of AJ and have Peter’s widow run the team? Who would we choose?
Maybe a package deal with Cease and Bogaerts for someone who wants Cease?
@@glennsilverman522 Dylan isn't good enough to make another team want to deal with the contract with X. It would take Dylan, at least one of our two top prospects and throw in lots of cash to get that deal done. LOTS OF CASH
And that's only if the Padres don't ask for much in return. The whole plan behind it must be just to get rid of his contract and move on. Sometimes you just have to suck it up and pull the trigger.
@@glennsilverman522 nope not enough. One year of Cease
Pads need to bite the bullet, swallow a large portion of Xander's contract, and trade him. Has to be done.
LOL they will be listening foe a very long time. Padres would have to eat 180 million. He would struggle to get 3 years 50 million on the open market. Teo is currently only getting offers at 3 years 65 million and he is much better than Xander and the same age
Bogaerts to Astros seeking alex bregman replacement for tucker? Probably not
Breaking News: Xander Bogaerts waves his full no trade clause and has been traded to the Athletics as the Athletics take on the full remainder of his contract and the Padres get Mason Miller.
In a couple of years Bogaerts contract might be the goin rate for an average player but he better start playing better than he has been because he's been below average. If a team is really interested in Cease and the Pads tell them they will take less in return if they take Bogaerts off our hands as well I think its a good move. Getting his deal off the books would free the team up to actually contend smartly for the next decade with Tatis and Merrill in their Primes. But as long as he is a Padre they have no chance of competing and its wasting two potential all time greats.
He’s not the only one they are listening on. Sadly.
Would it be funny if we trade Xander, then he goes and wins a gold glove or a silver slugger
@ Hilarious and SO Padres! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Preller has brought in talent and put fans in seats. Got to give him that. However, he’s also made some decisions that has constricted the team from being able to make immediate improvements. It’s no disrespect as I’ve never seen a perfect GM.
Never been a GM however, if one takes a risk, it’s evident that the risk should be made with a means to get out of it or move a contract if things go south. Signing a player to a huge contract with a no trade clause is a huge risk.
In order for the padres to move forward, they have to rectify the Bogaerts contract. He’s not playing up to a quarter of a billion dollar contract. It doesn’t seem like he’s happy here. You can see it from Machado and Tatis. They’re fired up and happy to be here. Bogaerts doesn’t. When you sign a player to that kind of money, they should no kidding change the trajectory of your franchise and be hypothetically almost the face of the franchise.
In order for the Padres to be able to move forward , they have to move the Bogaerts contract. Signing a player to that kind of money says that that player is more important than extending other players and signing players for other positions in need.
They got into the playoffs with Bogaerts and the whole team choked in their final two games. He’s not the problem. The problem is Peter Seidler is gone and his estate wants to preserve its money.
The only hope is to build the farm and not trade away top Padres prospects. Plus,fill gaps with second tier MLB players. Profar was a second tier player, also Higgy. Maybe that’s the Padres strength, player development.
No one wants X. The Padres would have to eat the majority of that contract and give up a prospect. Tatis is the only player any team would take but he's got getting moved. The only other piece is to move Machado and eat some of the deal and or trade Darvish.
Hey man had his 3rd scotch when he said that
all the why why why's....why did SD sign Bogaerts to that ridiculous contract, that's what you should be asking yourselves.
Padres fire sale!! No way they keep up with the Dodgers now 😂😂
It's all hype our boys not going no where we trying to win GO padres baby ⚾️⚾️
I’d rather keep him. The guy is a stud when healthy.
The sad thing is even if Padres brought in a new GM tomorrow he would be strapped with the same problems AJ strapped himself with right now. No matter who the GM is, contracts are going to have to be eaten and top prospects will have to be attached with these bad decisions to get them out the door to start over. If I was off to this GM job it would only be under those conditions otherwise and new GM will simply be doing well just to tread water until he's fired for what AJ created.
Xander is a great guy. But he's not working out.
Agree! Great guy, solid player, but the WORST contract on the team. 🫣
I’m listening to offers for my house with a cracked slab, no indoor plumbing and no roof too. I’ll probably get one before the padres do for X.
250k, ?
Does it come with a view?
@@mike-vq8zw ocean view and it's all worth it 🤣
@@redpillbrotherhood110 My home is next to the Santee dump, care to trade straight up? When the wind is right, there's no better place to be. I'll even throw in my broke down motorhome to seal the deal. No engine, no tires and no windows but it sleeps 4 comfortably. Just like the Padres, I'll do anything to get this deal done.
Who wants to take in that nasty contract?
Wish list would be for Boston to take back Xander, they literally need a righty AB (hence Arenado rumors). Thats the only team that makes logical sense, especially considering his history. Maybe new Red Sox front office wants the nostalgia of ‘13 & 18’ back? Would take some Preller magic… maybe Cease is the guy you throw in? Also, trading Cease would thin out the pitching rotation, but if he goes to Baltimore they’re stocked up on good talent.
I can't see Baltimore taking on anchor contract. They are notoriously cheap and You're going to need to throw in more than 1 year of Cease and a prospect. I think Steve Cohen is your best bet, but that dude didn't his billions by throwing money away
@@AlanYeezyi don’t think I made myself clear. I meant that Cease goes to Baltimore. Not Xander. Xander goes to Boston. Baltimore could totally do another 1-year rental for an ace pitcher.
@@inalavalamp I see. Not a bad idea. Baltimore is loaded with young talent. You're probably not going to get for Cease what they gave up for Burns. Burns is better than Cease. However you definitely should get some solid potential back. Xander going back to Boston based on nostalgia is very unlikely. When you said "maybe Cease is a guy you throw in" it sounded like to Boston. I'm not trying to be combative but I think you're going to have to give the farm to Boston to take on 9 years of an anchor. From what I hear Boston is trying to compete right now so I don't know if prospects are really what they are after. That's why I thought Steve Cohen might be willing to take him on because he could careless about 9 years of 200 million. However he's not dumb either and he's going to want a lot in return.
@@AlanYeezyI think initially I meant “throw in Cease” with Xander as an incentive, before they got Garrett Crochet. Don’t know if they’d take Cease AND Xander now, considering the prospects Padres would want in return. But maybe Cease to Baltimore, for 2-3 top prospects, and Xander to Boston and throw in some money? I’m not GM but I know things can be worked out. Perhaps a prospect from Baltimore in a Cease trade, could then take the place of Salas, or be used to throw in with Xander.
@@inalavalamp I think you're a better GM than Preller. I'm a Dodger fan but I don't hate the Padres as a franchise but I think there front office is bad. I'm do tease them a little. The Dodgers need San Diego to be good. They don't win the World Series this year without the lessons learned from the Padres the pass few seasons. That's why I don't see an AL team winning for a WS for a while. Walk into the World Series but don't know what to do when sh... hits the fan. See Yankees 5th inning. lol. Hopefully the Padres get their ish together. When the Padres get there I'm sure they'll be able to take what happened this year and apply it to getting the monkey off their back.
Padres are listening? Most likely they are beging for other teams trade for him. They will have to eat around 60~70% of his contract to get rid of him. They are stuck with him lol
sasaki not signing wiith padres.. they sound like mess with GM out there trying to shop around half the team and trying to cut payroll.. why would a stud like sasaki wanna get involved with that mess?
It’s safe to say Padres aren’t making playoffs next year lol
No one is taking that horrible contract😂😂😂 X is also under control when in the batter box. Under the pitcher's control😂😂
Dodgers trade Chris Taylor (Final Year) for Xander Bogart and King.
@@chriscejnar3802 no shot lol
Your team is trash 😂😂
id pay money to see arraez and Bogaerts traded
@@Twicelovetwicelife if you can come up with 200 million I think the deal can get done 😁
@@mike-vq8zw ok what if you increased every san diegans taxes by 1%, a small price to pay for salvation
@@Twicelovetwicelife you sound like a politician, that's always there go to solution 😁. Taxes in this state are ridiculous enough don't you think? How about bringing in someone who can manage a roster without overspending on the first six of that roster.
@ nah, politicians don’t use taxes effectively. I think using our taxes to pay off Bogaerts contract will be a better use than fixing the potholes that are never going to get filled
@Twicelovetwicelife do you think that 1% tax whatever go to the Padres? OF COURSE NOT
THE ORGANIZATION JUST NEEDS TO BE MANAGED BETTER. PERIOD !! AND THE FANS NEED TO WAKE UP AND DEMAND BETTER. ALL THESE SELLOUTS AND INCREASE TICKET PRICES AND NOW WE'RE DOWNSIZING THE PAYROLL? QUITE A COINCIDENCE
When a Pobres pitcher has a good season, it has to be because of Niebla. When the pitcher doesn’t do well or regresses, it’s the pitchers own fault. We get it. No need to explain anymore. Niebla is Pitching God. He’s the best in MLB. You, Pobres fans that only pay attention to your own team, go off the stats where a pitcher improved and give credit to Niebla. You guys are the bandwagon fans.
Trade fernado tatatis 😅.
I see no way the Padres can get rid of X this soft season without attaching one of the Padres top two prospects along with some cash to him. Even at that they won't get much in return. It will be a team that has money, doesn't care about X, likes the extra cash, but really likes the prospect. There aren't many teams like that around. The longer the Padres go holding on to X the less likely they are of getting rid of him . Padres are going to have to make a decision soon. Just succumb to the fact they are going to be straddled with the contract of X for years to come or admit they made an incredible mistake and because of it are going to have to include one of the top prospects in baseball to free themselves up and service this team in more positions. No way can this team do both. Can't have all these huge contracts that are going to look worse and worse as the years go by including X right now AND keep the two top prospects they have AND pay the going rate to be competitive. They have put themselves in an extremely bad position.
Throw in De Vries and Kash Mayfield and get X gone
@redpillbrotherhood110 I think the Padres would rather keep De Vries. I'd take my chance on him making it over the catcher. It's just too bad they may have to make that choice just to dig themselves out of the hole they themselves dug . If they don't dump a couple of these contracts soon they will be a middle of the road team, never good enough to win it all but not bad enough to end up last. That's the worst.
@@redpillbrotherhood110 The worst is not knowing whether to go all in or dump it all and get out and start over. Every year they sit like this they will just be treading water. SHIT or get off the pot.
@@mike-vq8zw It's definitely time to pony up and make a decision. They should(but likely won't) do one of two options:
1)Operate in a loss for a year or two and go all in and break the luxury tax. This would be signing Corbin Burnes, trying to land Roki Sasaki, re-sign Kim and Solano and Tanner Scott then do one big trade, perhaps to get Casas and Wilyer Abreu or send De Vries, Salas and a pitcher to get Kyle Tucker and then extend him immediately as part of the consideration for the trade. They would arguably be the best team in baseball at this point.
2)They realize the budget issues without trying to rebuild and trade away Cease and either X or Cronenworth to get Casas, Abreu and Marcelo Mayer in return. Maybe add Kash Mayfield and another prospect to get it done. Then try to get Sasaki and fill out the rotation with 1-2 flyers towards the end of free agency. This wouldn't make the team great right now, but competitive while keeping budget same or a bit less. They get young, cheap MLB ready players under club control in Mayer, Casas and Abreu to add to the mix with Merrill, Salas, De Vries, maybe Sasaki, Tatis as a relatively good contract etc. They'd then have a young core for years to come to build around while being reasonably competitive now
@@redpillbrotherhood110 X is the sticking point. The only way you get rid of him is to add one or two big prospects, lots and lots of cash and then expect very little in return just so you can get on your way. The other bad contract is crony. Not so much the money but length of time. Seven long years and he's no young pup. To get rid of those two you can't expect much in return regardless of how much the Padres have to put in.
Maldita sea!! Los padres volverán a ser un equipo realmente mediocre
The Owner that spent the money passed away....The Padres are not gonna be making huge signings......they are gonna be cutting payroll!!......Padres are gonna be going back to that crappy team we all are used to!!
It really does feel that way. Making a U-turn on Cease and trading him now just feels like an insult to the fans that have supported this team.
Machado, Tatis and Merill alone is far from crapy
lol yall made a HUGE mistake getting Xander for that many years and that much $$$ you played yall selfs so bad
none of US did anything
We got this under control you orangutan
@@justing42 these dodger fans are so bored
We got this you orangutan !
This guy's a joke😂😂😂
he’s a kid…people that communicate using emojis are the one who are a joke
Why are you here then. You zombie
I like Xander, he’s just overpaid 🫣
Xander sucks