DON'T Buy This - ASUS PG49WCD QD OLED Monitor

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ม.ค. 2024
  • Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
    Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable: amzn.to/432NDGS
    Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
    Get access to all my ICC profiles & Discord: / thedisplayguy
    Buy the Samsung G93SC: amzn.to/48jgBG6
    Buy the ASUS PG49WCD: shop.asus.com/us/90lm09c0-b01...
    ASUS PG49WCD Launch Video: • Experience Endless Imm...
    DON'T Buy This - ASUS PG49WCD QD OLED Monitor
    So ASUS released their own Great Value version of the OLED G9, and after swearing they’d send a review sample for months, I’ve decided it’s time we take a look at this thing to see if it’s even worth considering.
    Oh and by the way I will be purchasing the 240Hz Non smart version OLED G9 by popular request for a full review soon, which is possible thanks to all my wonderful Patrons (link in the description if you want to help support my work, I highly appreciate it).
    But anywho yes the ASUS PG49WCD is finally available for purchase and comparing it to the G93SC
    SPECS
    SAME
    GLOSSY
    Size: 49”
    Aspect Ratio: 32:9
    Resolution: 5120x1440
    Panel Tech: QD OLED V2
    Contrast Ratio: Infinite
    Gsync/Freesync?: Yes
    Colors: Amazing
    HDR: Best
    DIFFERENT
    Refresh Rate: 144Hz vs 240Hz (G93SC: 67% more) +2S
    Panel Tech: Custom heatsink +1A
    Stand: Larger +1S
    Ports: Same DP 1.4 & HDMI 2.1, but not micro +1A
    Price: $1,299 vs $1,199
    All amazon links are affiliate links. I earn commission based on your purchases.
    Music
    www.davidcuttermusic.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 86

  • @sowder
    @sowder 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    You spent more time showing ads than being honest about this monitor. You didn't even bother to point out that it has other advantages over the Samsung and LG with the smart KVM, which is the main reason I bought it. And the better anti burn in features. What about the single USB C connection for everything (audio, video, power, and USB hub)? Plus, it's just better looking than any of those. And thinner with a better stand. And don't forget the quality control lottery you get with Samsung.

    • @michaeljferrell
      @michaeljferrell 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      same, the smart kvm is soo nice.

    • @ubgradde
      @ubgradde 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      With all the burn in features, would it still be risky to do things in Excel, Word and other software for a long time instead of gaming most of the time?

    • @Aszourus
      @Aszourus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ye this video is so biased its ridiculous this is easily the best super ultrawide

    • @TheMadskater360
      @TheMadskater360 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you use smart kvm with a mac and PC by chance?

    • @sowder
      @sowder หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @TheMadskater360 Yes. Both. The only downsides are that the Mac makes the aspect ratio on the laptop screen the same as the monitor, and the Mac won't hit the max resolution.

  • @arc00ta
    @arc00ta 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    I can't even describe how much I hate those V-shaped stands. Its like 99% of the way to how much I hate matte finish, only not quite there because I can get a VESA mount if I have to.

    • @faultier1158
      @faultier1158 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, I have a monitor with a v-shaped stand as well and it somehow blocks more area than my other monitors.

    • @arc00ta
      @arc00ta 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@faultier1158 Yeah my mouse always hits the stand, and I specifically bought a 32" deep desk instead of the normal 24", its crazy.

    • @FantasticKruH
      @FantasticKruH 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I face the stand sideways and then swing the monitor towards me.
      Takes less space that way hahaha. Those huge v shaped stands take so much space.

    • @tsuxmax
      @tsuxmax 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SOLUTION: Ergotron

  • @Vennomite
    @Vennomite 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Samsung qc and support are absolute trash. There is 0 point in buying from samsung.

  • @AllMightyMuthius
    @AllMightyMuthius 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I've only had bad luck with Samsung monitors. So I like seeing other companies release ultra wides

    • @kolysion164
      @kolysion164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I have it, no issue, I have only ASUS panel, I have pg27aqn and pg49wcd, they are perfect, omg bye bye samsung shit panel

  • @Duy1P3
    @Duy1P3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This dude worked so hard for that bonus check from Samsung lol

  • @zctechbd
    @zctechbd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    i just got my G93sc and i love it so far!

  • @KRISHNAWARRIOR
    @KRISHNAWARRIOR 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    are the dots at the asus also triangle positioned, linke at the sasmung, or classical? I heard triangle ositioning is really bad for text ...?

  • @davidsong7251
    @davidsong7251 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dang I actually love the KVM on the rog vs the Samsung one… anyone have an idea of which monitor has KVM, has QD-OLED, curved, 45-49”, has burn-in preventative tech, usb-C PD port for MacBook, high refresh, and optimal for 8 hour coding and then gaming at night situations? Really long list of things but this ROG almost checked everything off except the high refresh and the burn-in preventative

  • @geo_beans
    @geo_beans 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Do you run the Graphically Challenged channel as well? If not, you sound the same.

  • @Deffine
    @Deffine 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you considered reviewing any of the 43" Samsung glossy TVs?

  • @maighe_tv2848
    @maighe_tv2848 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for your videos, Mr. monitor man

  • @kolysion164
    @kolysion164 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have it and no issue, buy it guys ! it's not bugged with gsync like all the samsung monitors

    • @AMGLUNA
      @AMGLUNA 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Does this one has flickering issues like the Samsung g9 ?

    • @kolysion164
      @kolysion164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no cause it's asus@@AMGLUNA

    • @kolysion164
      @kolysion164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no cause it's ASUS, the best@@AMGLUNA

  • @tadejpeckaj1151
    @tadejpeckaj1151 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bought the Philips Evnia 49 QD OLED in the end (KVM) and it’s a freaking amazing monitor!

  • @fistnchickz618
    @fistnchickz618 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Your right about Samsung's QC dealing with that BS atm trying for a refund on my G95NC the panel died twice in 3 months !!

  • @eduonkhl
    @eduonkhl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Samsung unveiled 3 new QD OLED monitors ahead of CES and they all seem to have anti glare. It's good to have options but I'd be really disappointed if they roll back on having a nice glossy finish at least as an option. Probably had too many people complaining about it not having a matte finish and I doubt they'll be bothered to make 2 versions, really hope I'm wrong.

  • @xpodx
    @xpodx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    To bad the ppi is pretty low. That's why I stick with 16:9 4k 144hz 28"
    Want a upgrade so bad..

  • @Mikewood-qq6hq
    @Mikewood-qq6hq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Best oled ive used .

  • @user-vi3pb1lt8m
    @user-vi3pb1lt8m 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Do people still buy asus?
    I mean, no burn-in warranty is a very stupid decision to do.

    • @CuttinInIdaho
      @CuttinInIdaho 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The mighty have fallen. I bought a ROG Zephyrus laptop which decided the only gpu it would use was the igpu on the Ryzen...no matter what I did...$1500 dollar mistake, thank god best buy took it back after days of failed effort with support as well.

    • @Beatcheeks89
      @Beatcheeks89 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have the asus 240 27 inch monitor it’s fire !!! Best 27 inch monitor out right now imo

    • @colton9841
      @colton9841 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To be fair, Samsung doesn’t have a burn in warranty either. That said, Asus monitors tend to have so many issues.

    • @eduonkhl
      @eduonkhl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Finally someone that still has some braincells left. Having by far the highest brightness monitor with the same panel as others use and not having a burn in warranty is like trying to sell you a car with 5 bar boost pressure instead of the usual 2 bar on the very same engine that you know will blow up after the first few pulls. I'm sorry but you'd have to be actually stupid to buy the Asus or you really don't care if it will burn in 2-3 times faster if not even quicker and having wasted your money without being able to get a replacement.

    • @eduonkhl
      @eduonkhl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@colton9841 Tell me more. I have 2 different Asus monitors with the infamous no signal issue. Now I'm going out of my way to not buy Asus even if the other options are worse on paper. At least I hope they know how to have the most basic thing possible on a monitor work which is detecting a fu**ing input signal in the first place (no it's not the cable or port or just an exception, it's a common problem with Asus monitors).

  • @la3692
    @la3692 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree they need to cut the price but it might be good for people that don't have a top-of-the-line GPU to push the Samsung😅

  • @Svante
    @Svante 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I'm am extremely happy with this display. I don't play esports crap, so 144hz is just fine with me.
    I had so many problems with Samsung displays, that I don't even care if they make one with 5 billion hz.

  • @paulmw8888
    @paulmw8888 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    144Hz vs 240Hz, are you really going to notice the difference compared to the amount of money you need to spend on a higher end graphics card and all that goes with it (Power supply and CPU), the ASUS OLED is amazing at 144Hz with the detail and blacks, best thing is, you can get away with running a 3080 RTX and i7 at high or mostly ultra settings within most current games, try pushing out 240Hz at the same quality settings! Really wish these reviewers compared the total system required to run higher end gear instead of saying "ohh 240Hz is so much better".. Yeah if you spend $4k on the rest of your gear it is, if you don't upgrade everything else you are will be very disappointed. Sure you will have a greater refresh rate but running at lower graphic settings - so your image and immersion quality will be much less and you will be very VERY disappointed (unless you spend an extra few $k.

  • @7SlicesOfPizza
    @7SlicesOfPizza 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is using the 1st gen wdoled panels?

    • @lol3ndir
      @lol3ndir 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2nd.

  • @Manic.miner2077
    @Manic.miner2077 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve been looking at the new monitors, I’m done with all the “gamer” crap, I’m going for a 2024 oled tv.
    Much better quality and value, 144hz is fine for me.

  • @MrDutch1e
    @MrDutch1e 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'd say it should be at LEAST $300 less than the Samsung version. 144hz to 240hz is a massive difference. I wouldn't even consider 144hz. I'm on the AW3423DWF and it's not enough imo coming from 240hz IPS. I've adjusted to it but I def wish I waited for a 240hz glossy 16:9 or a 240hz 21:9 ultrawide. Now that I'm adjusting tho I'm sure I'll be fine. Glorious monitor for sure.

    • @kolysion164
      @kolysion164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      my 4090 can't push +45fps in cyberpunk at 4k ultra, stop being idiot, 144hz is more than enough, and the gsync compatible range for ASUS is 48-144hz, samsung is 60-240hz, useless...if I want to play at 360hz 1440p I have ASUS pg27aqn, it's all.

  • @NichtderMuller
    @NichtderMuller 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The same? Really ? Where is the USB-C & Smart KVM on the Samsung Monitor? Sorry dude, but this video is BS

    • @kevinduesing7468
      @kevinduesing7468 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep and from what I'm hearing, this is the same panel as the 240 refresh rate versions just slowed down to keep it cooler. Mist if us can't get 240 frame rate on this many pixels anyway. Be nice if we could overdrive it.

  • @asahisaiba1072
    @asahisaiba1072 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    may i ask a good gaming monitor 1440p 27inch

    • @tazboy1934
      @tazboy1934 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Odyssey g6 or the new aoc mini which cost 280$

    • @kolysion164
      @kolysion164 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      pg27aqn 360he ips asus, nothing better

  • @6shaker6
    @6shaker6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    144 hz is just a no go for me useless with my 4090 strix. G9 oled 57 inch would be way better 240hz

  • @joelwylde
    @joelwylde 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    right now the smart g9 oled is $1299.99

  • @gamerstimes127
    @gamerstimes127 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That V-shaped stand is a Don't buy for me

  • @Forza971sbh
    @Forza971sbh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I absolutely don't understand the pricepoint here... don't really care about the 144Hz (240Hz is overkill for the average buyer), love the KVM and DP/ALT with power delivery (work from home), but this monitor sells @ 1500€ in France vs the samsung "non smart" @ less than 1200€... Seriously Asus ?!?!?!

    • @kolysion164
      @kolysion164 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      every samsung panels are awfull with gsync issue flickers, the asus panel are almost perfect for the gamers without any gsync issue, nver buy samsung if you have very high standard, buy asus like me.

  • @Thomson244
    @Thomson244 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did you just don't recommend a device without testing it out?

  • @Blackstar-ti4py
    @Blackstar-ti4py 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not like anyones lookin to buy that apart from alien eggheads

  • @Samishii00
    @Samishii00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What make me hesitate to take a G93sc (or G9) is that it's 1800R and 1440p (really low ppi).
    The 1800r make me think it would be way too flat for gaming, wouldn't 1000r be better ? I fear it would.
    1440p is something i already have but on a 49" monitor ? + Oled ? Feel like i will have a hard time reading text on it, no ?

    • @jakevanoostrum622
      @jakevanoostrum622 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That’s not how resolution works.
      If you have a 27” 16:9 1440p monitor then the resolution is 2560x1440.
      If you have a 49” 32:9 1440p monitor then the resolution is 5120x1440.
      They both have a ppi of 109.

    • @Samishii00
      @Samishii00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jakevanoostrum622 Thanks for the answer pal, i saw my mistake some day after i posted it, that 49" is just like two 27" so essentialy same ppi, you're completly right.
      Still bummed out by the 1800R tho', but without seeing it in real life compared to a 1000r or 800r it's complicated to make a decision.

  • @zerotalent6463
    @zerotalent6463 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    lol This is selling for $1,799.98 in my city..

  • @lol3ndir
    @lol3ndir 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And the warranty is only 2 years vs 3 yrs from Samsung.

  • @tresnugget
    @tresnugget 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hopefully the OLED G9 can actually do 1000 nits. My AW3423DW is way better than my brothers Samsung G8 OLED since mine will do 1000 nits and his is stuck at 400 nits without a service remote.

    • @RiceCubeTech
      @RiceCubeTech 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I keep seeing this thing about people begging for their oleds to hit 1000 nits but there is not a single oled display that hits 1000 nits full screen. It’s always in like a 5 or 10 percent window. And on a larger display that’s even harder to do.
      OLEDs don’t need 1000 nits. HDR 400 true black on an oled is comparable image quality and hdr performance to somewhere inbetween hdr 1400 and hdr 1600 on an LCD that is capable of hitting 1000+nit flashes.
      Provided you’re not trying to view the TV in bright light (like for real just get black out curtains) I don’t see the issue. I literally play on an HDR400 LCD which isn’t even hdr so I play in SDR which is like 500nits full screen. That is quite bright to my eyes and I don’t even feel like I am lacking out on much when I play games. Only when I’m watching dark movies that benefit from true hdr will I go and watch on my mini LED TV.

    • @Enaxorize
      @Enaxorize 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What are you talking about? The dell hits 1050 nits at 2% window while the G8 hits 985 nits. The difference is irrelevant. Values are taken from the Rtings tests.
      For real scenes it’s 372 vs 447 nits, which is probably noticeable but given that the G8 costs 500€ less it’s probably acceptable. This is only for HDR though. SDR brightness is the same.

    • @tresnugget
      @tresnugget 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Enaxorize just Google it. If you want the g8 to do 1000 nits over dp in hgig mode which is necessary to tune a lot of HDR content in Windows 11 it requires a service remote. I've read that it'll do it over HDMI but he doesn't have a micro HDMI 2.1 cable to test it.

  • @monacocross4241
    @monacocross4241 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    dont buy 1470k /dont buy rtx4090 / wtf , make or create for sell some before talk nonsense

  • @jckkss4715
    @jckkss4715 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    49 inch on desk .... Are you serious people are serious with these monitor size WTF .... I think 32 or 34 ultrawide IS nice spot but 40+... Lol its a TV size how you Can play with this on a desk rip neck and eyes

  • @Fgmskak
    @Fgmskak 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best monitor youtuber ever ngl

  • @jjglaser
    @jjglaser 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1800r is just not enough curve for me.

    • @SwordTomato
      @SwordTomato 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      get the bendy one then lol

    • @romkkaa
      @romkkaa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Perfect curvature 👌

    • @visualcortex7500
      @visualcortex7500 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1500R could be a sweet spot for 49".

  • @OC.TINYYY
    @OC.TINYYY 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All Asus OLED monitors are trash.

    • @floorgang420
      @floorgang420 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hub rate one at s tier tho.

  • @Youngsoldier93
    @Youngsoldier93 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i just got my G93sc and i love it so far!

    • @ve3dy
      @ve3dy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same here, the best monitor I've ever bought. Worth every penny.