What Can We Learn From Fossils? | The Creation Podcast: Episode 28
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2024
- Is evolution seen in the fossil record? Why are fossilized terrestrial animals found buried with marine creatures? What conditions were needed to form the fossils we find today?
Take a deep dive into the fossil record in episode 28 of The Creation Podcast with host Trey Bowling and ICR geologist Dr. Tim Clarey. Discover how the global Flood model explains the progression of the fossil record.
Related resource: The Fossil Record | Get the book here: store.icr.org/...
#Science #Podcast #Dinosaur #Fossil #Bible #TheCreationPodcast #Fossils #TheUniverse #Origin #ICR
---
Do you have questions about science or Scripture? Post them in the comments and we might answer them in future episodes.
Tune in every other Tuesday here on TH-cam for new episodes. You can also find the audio version on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, and Google Podcasts.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel to get notified about all of our upcoming episodes!
Hope to see you next time on The Creation Podcast!
---
Learn more about the Institute for Creation Research: www.icr.org/
Shop our store: www.icr.org/
Support our ministry: www.icr.org/do...
Plan your visit to our Dallas creation museum and planetarium: discoverycente...
![[LIVE] BABYMONSTER(베이비몬스터) - DRIP | 두시탈출 컬투쇼](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UG05pxLGwzc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[안방1열 직캠4K] 베이비몬스터 치키타 'DRIP' (BABYMONSTER CHIQUITA FanCam) @SBS Inkigayo 241110](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tnlxo79cAqY/mqdefault.jpg)
As listened to this and imagined this "first" creation slowly being destroyed - it was the first time I could really identify with the sorrow the creator felt. It brings me to tears. This may be normal for many listeners for me it indicates the new work that God is doing in me as a result of being allowed to accept Jesus as my Savior. Praise God
Thanks to those all who made the pod cast possible.
This also brought me to tears, very well stated, thank you. God bless you and your family and home. PTL
1
Gotta love that new heart feeling. ❤️
The good news is that God has promised a new heaven and earth ...free from the curse where believers will dwell eternally with our Lord and Savior Jesus.
Same with me. 🙏🙏🙏
Got to love that Cambrian layer; gets em every time. All praise to our King and creator!
I love this channel, Thank you for strengthening people's faith in the Lord during a time when faith is constantly under attack.
Amen
Teaching the difference between uniformitarianistism and Catastrophism is my primary goal for the skeptical people.
Overwhelming evidence supporting a single catastrophic global flood versus many smaller local floods
Yet there is no evidence of a global flood, the one fact that there is not enough water even locked up in the ice caps to flood the world is a starter unless you are calling on another miracle to add and remove all that water in a instance.
I'm sure the humans figured out it was hitting the fan and went up as high as possible or found floating debris and, therefore, would not have been buried but rotted away or became fish food.
Sounds feasible
@jackjeffery1536 "sounds feasible"
Therefore god.
@@HyzerFlexOnYou The flood is a reminder that judgement is coming upon Sin, evil, and ungodliness. God is the Judge and must judge righteously. God said the thoughts of those who were on the earth were only evil continuously. The people of Noah's time were a terminal generation. Walking in faith in God's ways is salvation keeping one from the destruction of sin.
Remember, the global flood would have created massive biomass fields across the globe resulting from mats of floating trees, shrubs and other debris floating on the surface waters. Humans for a time could have floated on these debris until the debris became water logged and sank or people died from starvation. Either way the unprepared humans would have died, floated, bloated and been eaten by whatever sea creatures remained.
@alantasman8273 ie. Coal, mineralized tree and other organics, check out the continental shelves make up... it's wild!
I wonder how many human bones have been found in "inconvenient " locations and coverd up. I don't pretend they're honest in disclosure.
In the same way they hate skeletons of giants. because they don't fit in there evolution drama
Yeah, you have a valid point there. Probably many many human fossils in the wrong layers not being reported. Good news though concerning fossils. The pseudobiologists pseudoscience cover up of soft tissue in dinosaur bones has been blowed open revealing the truth, that practically every dinosaur bone has some soft tissue intact that can be scientifically experimented on.
The fossil record makes perfect sense to me (geologist). Small creatures buried first in Flood. Then running, flying creatures raced to higher ground.
If you're actually a geologist you would know that geology disproves the biblical flood story.
@@taylorthetunafish5737 it actually proves it. Overwhelming evidence for the Flood. But you are entitled to your wrong opinion.
@@JimFielding-lo8nf It's not an opinion. Geology disproves the biblical flood story. You're not a geologist.
@@taylorthetunafish5737 no use discussing. But for me, it's quite obvious. No one can change the obvious with spin.
@@JimFielding-lo8nf You may be right about one thing here, that it's no use discussing with you. Because you're convinced geology proves the biblical flood fable when in reality it disproves it. There's nothing obvious about the flood fable, it's made up nonsense and nothing in reality supports it.
Hope to catch as much of this topic from you guys as you can research. It is such big evidence to show, but such exciting evidence to view. Let's go!!!
Jake
Thanks Tim! Anyone who doubts this should read this good PhD’s books!
Love to add my fat thumb way up. Praise God for an abundance of evidence & for men willing & studied to speak Truth.
"Transitional fossils" (8:44). Never mind transitional fossils - where are the LIVING transitional forms? If evolution is a continuous process then we should observe at least some living organisms slightly different than the rest of the population and bearing some slight modification. That's how evolution works, so we're told. After all, if there ARE transitional fossils then they must have been alive and observable before they were fossilised. So where are all the current transitional forms?
We do see this but to our minds these are just different types of the same thing. There are over 150 species of chameleons, for example. And look at the all the different marsupials. These are different adaptations of the same animal.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Transitional organisms would be a clear mix of two different kinds, not variations within one kind. Examples of transitional organisms and what they would look like if they actually existed have been given in other of their videos.
@@jennifereverett6298 No, that's not how Evolution works. Evolution has no end in mind and no direction, it is simply that organisms that are best adapted to a particular environment tend to survive better than those that are not. There are not a 'mix of two different kinds'. The adaptations may be quite small - larger lungs if living in mountains, bigger feet for snow, better smell, clearer eyesight or complete lack of eyesight if living in the dark.
Speculation about what a transitional organism would like is simply nonsense - and disingenuous at that. Every creature is a transitional species of one type or another.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu There are several definitions of evolution, but most agree that the concept of evolution entails micro changes over millions of years that eventually become different kinds like a fish eventually evolving into a human. Therefore, there would be many transitional kinds that are a 'mix of two different kinds'--one kind changing into another kind. A cat changing into a dog or a cat with dog features, for example.
Scientists who are creationists believe that organisms adapt to their environments but also believe that the adaptation ability is God-designed--a sophisticated internal program of sorts within the DNA. But the biblically-sound creation scientists believe that adaptation only happens within species and never prompts or allows them to change kinds.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu It are still chameleons, it's called micro evolution
The order of burial reflects a lot of factors. The main three would be: water height, topography of land, and adaptability of creatures.
Mobility of the creatures (ability to escape). Density of their bodies.
Nope - it is when they were individually buried - which was at different moments in history.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu It's very unlikely they were buried at significantly different moments in history, unless you're referring to subsequent tsunami-like waves responsible for the different megasequences. But those wouldn't be separated by very much time.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu How do you explain the fact that there are marine creatures buried alongside land-walking animals? Sharks buried with T-Rex fossils, birds buried next to fish, etc. All over the fossil record.
@@chrispark2698 can you show me a documented instance of sea creatures in the same geological layers as land animals?
Great Video! Good Answers, Thanks!
Good, as always. :) I’m reading Tim Clarey’s latest book currently and highly recommend it.
I've been searching for someone to tell me about the fossils being washed out to sea... Such a great video!
Great video!
This is a wonderful, scientifically sound series, which is very educational and enlightening, both for Creationists and Non-Creationists. In regard to whether there is reference to dinosaurs in the Bible, it is true that the King James Version Bible was published before the term, in 1611, and the term dinosaur was coined in 1841 (or so) by Sir Richard Owen. However, many scholars and students of the Bible do not see dinosaur references in Job, due to its patriarchal setting (long lifespan and no centralized sacrificial system, nor organized priesthood, among other indicators). Therefore, "behemoth" and "leviathan" evoke, to many, images of existing creatures, such as hippopotamus, crocodile, elephant or other. The non-specific nature of Job's terms for certain large, powerful, formidable creatures, in this instance, may have been a culturally and contextually inclusive device, possibly also hinting at a knowledge of huge animals that became extinct during the Flood. It may also reflect a practice, in the Bible and in many other ancient documents, to write contextually according to the condition and circumstances of the times, including existing peoples and other creatures. Therefore, since the Bible does not specifically describe all land, marine and avian creatures, the apparent absence of dinosaurs is not a problem. However, their total absence may speak positively to the biblical writers' acknowledgment of the devastating, destroying impacts of the flood, and specifically the extinction of dinosaurs and certain other life forms. G-d bless!
"inclusive device"
Nothing inclusive about the behemoth in Job, no modern day animal has a tail the size of a cedar.
Have you seen a cedar tree? They are huge, like the tail of a sauropod.
"extinction of dinosaurs"
Who said they are extinct? I predict dinosaurs are as alive today as the coelacanth is.
I thought Leviathan and Bohemot were spirits.
@@helenholdsworth6407
No they are creatures, God is telling Job how he created them.
This is not scientifically sound. It ignores science and makes up it's own nonsense calling it science.
I would think humans heard of impending judgment by flood and headed for the hills, especially as the strange rain began falling to earth.
The flood covered all the hills so heading for the hills still got them killed. The only salvation was the Ark and they were warned the flood was coming.
There was much flotation material that people could have used to survive longer.
But not much longer...
@@technicianbis5250 They were super-advanced with technology beyond ours. They could have gone off world.
@@jacob.tudragens
Yes i agree, there would have been flotsam floating about but how would they get to it? How would they feed themselves for a year? God said all mankind would be wiped from the face of the Earth, did that not happen? Even if many had gotten to a log mat and avoided drowning they would still die.
Great. What about apes or any other human sized modern animal? We don't see any modern species in dinosaur sites. Many human sized extinct animals but no modern species. That's in over 8,000 sites.
Thank you for the fantastic job you do ❤❤❤
I'm also wondering what the population of humans was before the flood. On the small side would also help to explain why few human fossils have been found.
Yes, I believe since the humans were thoroughly evil, I argue the human population was decimated...perhaps just a few hundred drowned in the flood waters. Wars, murders, cannibalism, destruction of cities/buildings, destruction of corpses before the flood came.
Fascinating subject. The mega sequences contained incredible amounts of sediment that settled out into layers. Where did all the enormous volume come from, where was its source?
The flood washed massive amounts of materials from one place to another. It came from the dry land!
I wouldn't be surprised if the human bone dissolved in the sea. I mean look at the wreck of the titanic, there are no skeletons, just empty cloths and boots, they are all dissolved away
Birds suddenly appear at the top because they can easily fly away, until there's nowhere left to fly to...
Humans are not heavy like the giant creatures, so they probably got washed away in the water and never got fossilized.
Also - I don't believe the human population was in the billions at that time. Maybe a million..
@@topcatcoolio8807 Probably true, but remember men had many wives in those days, that might make the numbers way higher. It was about 1500 years I believe. How many people might get produced in that time with multiple wives?
@chronicfatiguehermithiker3022 1656 yrs. The population could easily have been in the trillions!
@@chronicfatiguehermithiker3022
Or they went off world.
Could-have-would-have doesn't stack up against archaeology. Buildings in stone and even mud can endure.
25:23 humans and dinosaurs... So the photo I saw in Henry Morris' The Genesis Flood 50 yrs ago showing human and dinosaur footprints contemporaneously in the Paluxy River basin was false?
When weather eroded them,scientists said the human footprints were dinosaur tracks
Yes - utterly misleading.
I remind my Sunday School students that the flood was a "near extinction" and not a total extinction event therefore land animals and birds we see in the fossil record didn't totally die out but their kinds survived on the ark with Noah and his family and this included dinosaurs that used to be called dragons.
Trey does a good job acting like he believes this stuff. He deserves an Emmy.
And you know how? …mind reader? I am phd clinical psychologist …and I did not get that impression.
Love it keep up the good work
Great video
I wonder has anyone calculated how much pressure there would be on the floor of a global flood at it's highest?
I'm going to start trying to find that as it seems many people forget that that would even be a thing.
Yet even today we know that the deeper we go into the sea the higher and higher that pressure gets.
We are told it takes immense pressure to form rock and fossilize with the added factor of time but we know time as it's seen can't be a factor considering we know the age of the earth.
Take care and God Bless.
Fossils form quickly when conditions are right. I'm talking months.
@davidstevens5908 thank you 😊 What you have said is true and has been proven.
Dr. Walt Brown Hydroplate Theory. He has a website with a free book that goes all through the mechanics of the flood.
Aw man. Did I miss the notification on this? I honestly had a question. Now I'm bummed.
We dug up fossils at pierce College and it looked like some art class had buried them as a time capsule
I'm sure there were many lifeforms of which we haven't found fossils which may explain why human fossils are mostly missing. They may be out there somewhere.
This is a great video, but you guys need to invite Roger Spurr on the channel. He's showing us compelling evidence that the layers of sediment Mainstream Science always references have a far different explanation then what we have long perceived. They are not indicators of age at all, and certainly don't support the notion of Millions and Millions of years.
If we had a progressive flood happen, right now, we will see exactly what we see in the fossil record marine life followed, my semi aquatic life followed by land animals
For more solid evidence check out Dr Carl Baugh or Dr Grady McMurtry, excellent researchers with valid explanations
It all comes down to who believes in GOD and who doesn’t. Not only the flood destroyed life but also there was a cataclysmic plate tectonic movement for GOD made valleys low, a place for the water to go AND made the mountains high to give us a foundation to stand on. To GOD BE THE GLORY AND NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM!! It’s HIS PLANET as is everything in the universe!
Idea of flood won't never cross their stupid mind who are willingly ignorant, doing evil all the time against God Jesus.
It's refreshing to know that videos like this will never have impacts on mainstream scientific thinking.
Institute for creation research does not mean you compared and contrasted the over 100 creation stories. Your research is on only one creation story.
I think that my only question is how the marine animals died if they lived in water. Was it that the water was being heated, too? Or perhaps that the depth/pressure of water was more than they could handle?
At about minute 14, the answer was given. Many were cooked with the plate tectonic activity.
And they were buried alive by rapidly moving sediment.
Buried alive. Many clams found fossilized with the long trail they left below them. They dug up till they died. Grace
A global flood is impossible, and it never happened. However, if it did, the problems marine creatures would face would be the salinity. Freshwater animals can't live in saltwater, too low or too much salinity and the saltwater creatures cannot survive.
@@taylorthetunafish5737 There's nothing impossible about a planet, currently covered 70% by water, to have been 100% covered by water at some time in the past. A global flood is possible. And aquatic species are adaptable and could have survived in oceans that had slowly increasing salinity.
Talking about mammals washed offshore: on the Texas Gulf Coast off the Bolivar peninsula (between Galveston and TX/LA border), after storms lucky beachcombers can find fossils of horses and human settlements. The Museum of the Gulf Coast in Port Arthur, TX has an extensive exhibit about them...from a secular point of view, of course.
The lizard era of dinosaurs really mucks things up. We need to start thinking of theropods as birds and triceratops as possible egg laying mammals. We should expect more variety of traits across kingdoms rather than a reptile dominant era that assumes reptiles can express any trait.
Genesis states birds were created before land animals so birds already existed before dinosaurs.
You are applying mans interpretation of what happened but God had already catalogued what happened and why in Genesis.
Triceratops being monotremes? Not sure about that considering they have beaks.
@@saitoren4061 maybe not monotremes specifically. But an egg laying mammal of some kind. I don't think the beak is a deal breaker. It's probably an indication of a tough diet rather than a species identifier. If all things were more genetically diverse, similar traits would exist for common function not common decent. But I do think overall skeletal structure, teeth, feet and stride are better ways to narrow down kind rather than slapping scales on it because of holes in the skull or the supposed time period🤷♂️.
@@Mule-chezedek about that, they say a small population of similar creatures still exists somewhere in Africa.
@@saitoren4061 it's possible, Africa is vast!
You can make fossils.. take a chicken skeleton or any small animal skeleton and seal it in some mud and come back in a year or two..
No, just no. Not how that works.
Humans would have been the last creatures to drown since they would have headed to hills and mountains.
👍
I want to know how Noah kept T-Rex on the ark?
baby ones
@@johnmeredith6890 Keeping elephants and the food required to feed them alone would take up 60% of the space on the ark. The ark is nonsense. Also, how did they feed and water all those animals everyday? Did I mention the Ark was nonsense? Also, what did they do with all the waste? Did I mention the ark is nonsense?
@@nathancook2852not nonsense at all
Maybe one reason for a lack of human fossils is the resurrection. One free gift to all humans from Jesus Christ through His Atonement is resurrection. An unspecified number of people were resurrected immediately after Jesus Christ was resurrected. Those bodies aren't stuck in the dirt.
There is no record of this in the scripture.
This is not even in the Bible.
@@marktapley7571 Actually, it is in the New Testament. I think it is Matthew. It is definitely in one of the gospels.
Yes. The saints who rose from their graves just after the Crucifixion.
Another reason why no human fossils is because they are removed by fossil hunters to preserve their millions of years. My theory is that human bones don't fossilize, they either stay bone or disintegrate completely in these conditions.
Exactly! I've long proposed that if any archeologist or paleontologist found human fossils in inappropriate layers, he would know that no professional journal would publish his claim. So he would either quietly *ignore* them or declare the site to be *contaminated* and move to a new site.
This is not a tenable theory in any way. It's a wish.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Do you _"wish"_ all life had evolved from a microbe?
@@StudentDad-mc3pu
The truth is, evolution is not tenable, there is not evidence for it occurring. Scientists are distancing themselves from darwin as the theory has become a joke mainly due to real science carried out by creationist and secular scientists.
@@KenJackson_US
He's hanging onto a dying/dead theory.
“Geology is not a real science.”
- - Sheldon Cooper, Big Bang Theory
Ha. Yes. If Evolution is starting to be proved wrong-they dismiss it 😅
@@topcatcoolio8807 You haven't even studied what evolution is.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 Polystrate fossils prove that layers are put down MUCH MUCH FASTER than what geologists think.
To answer the title, nothong that would support your creationist beliefs without lying.
GOD was pretty clear what a day or night
one Mudflood
Literally nothing in science confirms scripture. You can twist it all you want but you can't put a square peg in a round hole.
Wrong. Actually the flood evidence confines Scripture, and Scripture confirms the flood. Are you a Christian?
Yabba Dabba Doo
Study for me has been gathering information from different sources and then reevaluate the information according to the perspective of the source. I believe the Eden is right here in the OHIO VALLEY 🇺🇸 let me show you why! APR4U
I’d love to know why you believe Eden was in the Ohio valley.
I know, that just sounds crazy!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*facepalm*
I found an Eden, NY; an Eden VT; and an Eden NC. There may be more than that but I didn't find an Eden, OH.
Eden in NSW Australia!
Do creationists think plate tectonics have anything to do with forming mountains And other land masses or do they believe a character from a book created all the mountains and all the continents as we see them today?
Do you believe the earth is static?
Do you believe volcanoes form islands or again are islands something only characters from books can create?
You guys obviously have never talk to Dr Kent Hovind because Kent is right on e
Everythibg
Ah, yes, the tax evader and woman beater. Let's get our info from that guy. And his degree is from some papermill college located in a trailer in the middle of nowhere. His "dissertation" is literally written on a 5th grade level. But sure, let's trust that "genius."
All have a note book ready..Write down key points etc. Great for firing the truth out to those blinded by the fairy.. tale Evolution 😂 Example- There is no missing links below the Cambrian explosion.. And those on this explosion are fully formed !
You call evolution a fairy tale yet you have a tailbone, evidence that your ancestors once had a tail.
@@koonta6079 Why don't you have your tailbone removed and see if you can walk without it.
@@koonta6079 Haha. That tail bone so called is an anchor point for many ligaments muscles. The coccyx. Same on the Whale. Yet fairy tale Evolution Says Whales come from Cows !! It's an absolute joke. Anything not to believe in a designer God.
@@topcatcoolio8807 Evolutionary scientists claim that whales and cattle had a common ancestor. Twisting the story to say whales came from cows isn't doing your argument any good.
This is not really true. The Cambrian explosion lasted tens of millions of years and there are clear developments within that time frame with simple animals at the bottom and more complex versions at the top. For instance, there are more than 20,000 species of trilobite.
JESUS is LORD
The book of enoch brother
I think humans m I ved to high ground and tried to swim so didn't make fossils.
Science that confirms scripture? There's no such thing.
Strong words coming from a tuna fish.
@@icrscience Just a fact.
Did you mean this? th-cam.com/video/XKFwx52DOCQ/w-d-xo.html
@@icrscience Did I mean another youtube video full of misinformation and misrepresentation of science when I stated there's no scripture confirmed by science? No. No I certainly did not.
@@icrscience Can you present any one thing that demonstrates science supporting scripture? Nothing in this video does, nothing in the video you linked does, either.
Satan loves a great story that points people way from God!
Why have they not changed the history books
Bc they are liars
Methusalah avid Story teller or kept records of Pre-Noah period else Job wrote that Sentimental poem extinct Monsters on land as survived in sea, God might've felt too about them yet lizards and chickens on board Ark as mementos lest Humans own history mere chicanery else Sinners abound, and Christ Jesus for our sake His Experimental proof?!
What?
So you searched and searched to find places where the geological column is out of sequence - however ignoring the places where it is as expected and also where the finds date in chronological sequence. Evolution is easily seen in these places, with simple (and extinct) creatures at the bottom and complex ones at the top, with hardly any ape or hominid remains. Evolution is all around us.
WHERE are the fossils that show the transition from single cell to multicellular organisms, as well as from aquatic creatures to land creatures? WHY do all the creatures in the "Cambrian Explosion" emerge as fully functional beings? WHERE are the transitional forms for T-Rex and the other dinosaurs?
@@oldfart269 Cells don't fossilise so we would not expect to see these, however we do get structures from the Precambrian which include stromatolites and similar, traces of mats of algae-like microorganisms, and microfossils of other microorganisms.
The Cambrian 'explosion' took 30 million years and was, actually, one single adaptation and that was producing a hard outer-shell. It is, in fact, clear that we have transitional species within the Cambrian period that moved from simple to more complex. It's a fallacy to say that creatures 'emerged fully formed' and we should also remember that Cambrian creatures are very very simply organisms, all of which became extinct long before dinosaurs even walked the earth.
There are many transitional fossils before we get Dinosaurs. The earliest is the Ichthyostegalians which were amphibious animals which used their flippers as legs.
Pre Cambrian lasted billions of years
I’m sorry how did dinosaurs give us our oil if they are that recent
The oil comes from the once lush vegetation
Plate tectonics "cooked" marine life. Is that in the Bible? Creationists say the best things!
Where did the water come from, there is not enough water to flood the world by a long shot even melting the ice caps would not give you enough water, PS the ignorance of these 2 guys is amazing making their own conclusion by if ignoring centuries of discovery and research and swapping it out for a bible.
Creationists going out of their way to "debunk" science. I never see scientists wasting their time trying to prove religon wrong.
You're joking, right? You never heard Dawkins, Atkins, Hitchens, Krauss or any of the "New Atheists" constantly attacking religion?
Nobody is trying to "Debunk science." On the contrary, they are literally doing science in this discussion. This is what science is. Looking at the evidence and determining what is the best explanation. Debating the different ideas. Evolution is simply not a good explanation.
@@chrispark2698 Evolution is observable, but sure, it is not a good explanation. This channel never does science, they twist meaning and quote mine like none other though..
@@nathancook2852 What do you mean that "evolution is observable," exactly?
What in this instance was twisted?
"What can we learn from the fossil record"
Depends on who is doing the teaching...
The "to me it seems" or the " dinosaurs died off a thousand...couple of thousand...six thousand....last century".
Or the " let's simply explain the truthful knowledge without agenda".
The universe, including Earth is not six thousand years old.
Keep and play with your favorite toy with others who have the same toy as you.
Don't try and make me play with your favourite toy.
This guy has never looked at any fossils
Lie after lie after lie
Your totally wrong, after wrong, after wrong!
@@ElijahZylah can't be
Fossils are fake
Congratulations on finding a scientist / geologist who disagrees with all the other scientists and geologists. He must be right......mustn't he?
This is absolute proof that religion blocks critical thinking from the human brain, even from academically clever people.
So, if you disagree, that means you're wrong?
What were they wrong about?
@@chrispark2698 just about everything....seriously..
@@dongee1664 Name one thing. Be specific.
@chrispark2698 Re read what I said, which was that the overwhelming percentage of scientists and geologists refute these claims. You really shouldn't challenge on facts and evidence because you don't have any, stick to faith, it's all you've got. But to answer your challenge, the most ridiculous claim is Noahs flood. To me, it is unthinkable that Noah scoured the world getting kangaroos, penguins, elephants, etc and put them all on a primitive boat, fed them and cleared the waste daily. It is so ridiculous that it shouldn't even be considered. We know it didn't happen.
Try reality, it's a great place to be.
@@dongee1664 This conversation wasn't about Noah's flood. Your own personal incredulity is not an argument.
What, exactly, did they get wrong, in this discussion? Saying that other scientists disagree with them is not an argument either. Some of the greatest scientific advances have come from lone scientists who everyone else disagreed with.
Maybe the water washed out the uridium or what you called it from the asteroid.