@@Silence_Duder_Gooder It's not the original IP. It's the LA version and they have no affiliation with them and have distanced themselves from the LAIP.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder , wrong. he lied to the detective, a certain al brocchini, that his warehouse had no power. he also lied to the other detective a, a jon buehler, that he would take the polygraph. he had to tell the other police he went fishing because some guy at the marina identified him. he was likely set to tell them he was golfing also like he told laci's dad and other friends.
Burglars don’t murder and don’t go out of their way to cover up a misdemeanor with another crime that has the death penalty possibly attached. You silly goose!
THIS IS INSANE. HE IS GUILTY. Was the press out at 4am? So it's just a councidence that the burglars dumped her body where Scott said he went fishing that day?
@@Pray4All The State already wasted money when they convicted the wrong person. They spent millions and couldn't come up with a shred of evidence proving he did it. Absolutely nothing. And if you believe otherwise, you are just misinformed.
I really don't think he did it. I always thought the burglars did it. They even were talking on the phone in prison but the recording was "lost". Anyone who watched the documentary would know this. The witnesses time stamps when they saw Laci if they were correct he couldn't have done it. Not to mention he didn't get a fair trail at all because of all the press and how the public WANTED him guilty. They didn't move his trail far away enough
Because of that juror there should have been a mistrial. I know there is a lot of evidence against him but why didn't the police talk to all the witnesses that saw a pregnant woman walking a dog in the park by the Peterson's house? If I had been a juror I would have had reasonable doubt.
Fine, let's say these "robbers" are involved...most likely it eould be as accomplices. He is guilty but noone ever said he did it alone. Evil exists in this world & the devil takes care of his own.
@@lug.5329 What a dumb statement. The trial alone was nearly six months long. Do you have any idea how much a proper defense would cost? You have no clue about monetary value. The police and prosecutors spent millions and could come up with a shred of evidence proving he did this.
@@surpriseimblack The LA Innocence Project is on his case. I realize they are one founding member of a larger group called the innocence Network. My comment is regarding the Innocence Project.
Your husband is fooling around on you. Ok. Now he's also a murderer. Can anyone come up with any direct evidence that makes him guilty??? No? His whole case was built on circumstantial evidence. He should be free.
Problem with the burglars-across-the-street theory: according to the defense, Laci died _later_ and after giving birth, yet the burglars were caught pretty soon after their crime. How were they murdering Laci _after_ they were already in custody?
The *Scott is Awesome* cult don't have an answer for that one 🤐 The biggest problem with the burglary theory is that the burglary happened 2 days after Laci was murdered.
@@alexhidel3732, yeah, I'm not too sure about all that. He _looks_ guilty, sure, but that doesn't mean sh!t. I've seen cases where it looked _really_ bad for the person charged and convicted, and they turned out to be innocent of the crime they were convicted of. It can't hurt to make damn sure. I just don't trust the Modesto police, how they handled this case, or how the media, from day one, found Peterson guilty, especially Nancy (dis)Grace. She's such a repulsive person, and she and others, like Dan Abrams, lied about what Scott allegedly said to Amber one night and kept up that false narrative to boot! So, yeah, let's make sure, I say.
@@alexhidel3732 No evidence Scott transferred Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere? All forensic testing came back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene? They even tested the water in the boat, negative results. Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway, the States own expert and Forensic anthropologist determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. How is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th? Conners body was above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean? his left ear get permanently flattened against his head, and a rectangular piece of material was over it? No animal feeding on Conner whatsoever? Plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag. Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made. Police ignored evidence, tips and sightings that point in a completely different direction. Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day. No cadaver scent of Laci being dead in the boat, warehouse, truck, or home.
No evidence Scott transferred Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere? All forensic testing came back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene? They even tested the water in the boat, negative results. Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway, the States own expert and Forensic anthropologist determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. How is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th? Conners body was above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean? his left ear get permanently flattened against his head, and a rectangular piece of material was over it? No animal feeding on Conner whatsoever? Plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag. Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made. Police ignored evidence, tips and sightings that point in a completely different direction. Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day. No cadaver scent of Laci being dead in the boat, warehouse, truck, or home.
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
Those doubts are far from reasonable. 🙄
The Innocence Project doesn't take cases unless they feel there is reasonable suspicion the person was not given a fair shake.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder It's not the original IP. It's the LA version and they have no affiliation with them and have distanced themselves from the LAIP.
@@lonelyheroine, yeah, I realize that fact.
When or how far does it go before questioning the justice system is corrupted in CA
He’s guilty, guilty,guilty and oh yeah GUILTY
This is America and EVERYONE is INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty!!
Then you shouldn't mind a new trial.
Waste of time and money for a retrial
Yes ..waist of $$$$
Scott lied about everything .
No, he lied about the affair, but told the police 100 percent truth of what they asked him.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder riiiiiight 😂😂😂
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder Wrong. He lied.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder , wrong. he lied to the detective, a certain al brocchini, that his warehouse had no power. he also lied to the other detective a, a jon buehler, that he would take the polygraph. he had to tell the other police he went fishing because some guy at the marina identified him. he was likely set to tell them he was golfing also like he told laci's dad and other friends.
Justice doesn't have a time limit....
Guilty until proven innocent .
That's the problem in this country
@@lindacalderon6417, oh, I'd say at least since 1692?
Burglars don’t murder and don’t go out of their way to cover up a misdemeanor with another crime that has the death penalty possibly attached. You silly goose!
I watch a ton of true crime shows and yes, sometimes burglars murder people.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder. Of course they do. In Australia, Queensland, recently, robbers murdered a mother. Tragic!
What??? Wrongo!! Bigtime.
Tamara Ann Cundey Dunstan
How do you know? Are you a burglar? Hmmm.
THIS IS INSANE. HE IS GUILTY.
Was the press out at 4am?
So it's just a councidence that the burglars dumped her body where Scott said he went fishing that day?
Then you shouldn't mind a new trial.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder. Absolutely. Why not see what they have.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder Shut up will you?
Let them do the DNA testing and let them give him a new trial - He will be found guilty again without question
Oh Geragos go away your pockets aren’t full enough? I used to respect you……..
Ridiculous, he’s guilty…..
Then you shouldn't mind a new trial.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder ,
A waste of taxpayer dollars, I do mind….
@@mickeyandres2651why? Your tax dollars go to mothers who murder their baby daily?
@@Silence_Duder_GooderI’m not paying for that crap 💩
Mark Geragos defends the guilty lol His radar is way off . And Scott is as guilty as they get. 👎🏻
Then you shouldn't mind a new trial.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder other than they wasting the peoples money. Just to prove him guilty again
@@Pray4All. Nothing ventured nothing gained.
All prosecutors are evil
@@Pray4All
The State already wasted money when they convicted the wrong person. They spent millions and couldn't come up with a shred of evidence proving he did it. Absolutely nothing. And if you believe otherwise, you are just misinformed.
I really don't think he did it. I always thought the burglars did it. They even were talking on the phone in prison but the recording was "lost". Anyone who watched the documentary would know this. The witnesses time stamps when they saw Laci if they were correct he couldn't have done it. Not to mention he didn't get a fair trail at all because of all the press and how the public WANTED him guilty. They didn't move his trail far away enough
Because of that juror there should have been a mistrial. I know there is a lot of evidence against him but why didn't the police talk to all the witnesses that saw a pregnant woman walking a dog in the park by the Peterson's house? If I had been a juror I would have had reasonable doubt.
Fine, let's say these "robbers" are involved...most likely it eould be as accomplices. He is guilty but noone ever said he did it alone. Evil exists in this world & the devil takes care of his own.
It's just a coincidence that he had a little boat on the bay.....
Oh come on buddy .
@@bowmama8, but the guy never lied to the police.
Sure, he lied about the affair, like anyone who was guilty of that sin would in his situation.
Poor Ms Lacy 😢 she been going for so many years ❤😢
I did not forget that he told Amber a few weeks before Lacey went missing that he lost his wife and it's his first Christmas without her.
Poor Ms Lacy 😢 she been going for so many years ❤😢
The lawyer is just not so good. $100K in legal fees, and they still lost
@@lug.5329 What a dumb statement. The trial alone was nearly six months long. Do you have any idea how much a proper defense would cost?
You have no clue about monetary value. The police and prosecutors spent millions and could come up with a shred of evidence proving he did this.
NO!!
This monster is guilty , keep it in jail, guilty ,guilty guilty .
Then you shouldn't mind a new trial.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder Scott Peterson is on here.
No.
Yes.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder No
I certainly hope he never sees the light of day on the outside again. May Laci R.I.P 😢
I can only feel for Laci and Conner's family hearing about this. I sure hope their at this new trial to make sure he doesnt walk free.
What new trial?
@@sophie8394 he's getting a new trial, that's whats being said.
@@cindyrussell1581 no one has granted him a new trial 🤣
@@sophie8394 that's why their in court to find out if he's getting a new trial, I think it will happen, I sure in the hell hope it doesn't.
@@cindyrussell1581 no. His lawyers are trying to *get* him a new trial. They've been trying for years. They are 0 for 3 so far.
The Innocence Project; freeing one guilty person at a time.
It's actually called the Innocence Network
@@surpriseimblack The LA Innocence Project is on his case. I realize they are one founding member of a larger group called the innocence Network. My comment is regarding the Innocence Project.
NN, you guys are my only go-to for my news since day 1! UFOs are real!!!
Your husband is fooling around on you. Ok. Now he's also a murderer. Can anyone come up with any direct evidence that makes him guilty??? No?
His whole case was built on circumstantial evidence. He should be free.
He just might be
What?
Okay!!!?
Yeahya!
Problem with the burglars-across-the-street theory: according to the defense, Laci died _later_ and after giving birth, yet the burglars were caught pretty soon after their crime. How were they murdering Laci _after_ they were already in custody?
The *Scott is Awesome* cult don't have an answer for that one 🤐
The biggest problem with the burglary theory is that the burglary happened 2 days after Laci was murdered.
For the love.. read the new motion.
Where are your facts?
@@sophie8394
Is that why Diane Jackson reported the men in front of the Medina’s home as being the 24th? FFS, stop spreading BS!
@@aok4418 Shut up, Scott.
Loony left bizarro world of course
Then you shouldn't mind a new trial.
Scott didn’t do it, the police 👮 set him up, please god set him free
We'll certainly see, if he gets a new trial.
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder I was just joking, he is guilty as 💩. Chris Hedges is one on my favorite people.
@@alexhidel3732, yeah, I'm not too sure about all that. He _looks_ guilty, sure, but that doesn't mean sh!t. I've seen cases where it looked _really_ bad for the person charged and convicted, and they turned out to be innocent of the crime they were convicted of.
It can't hurt to make damn sure. I just don't trust the Modesto police, how they handled this case, or how the media, from day one, found Peterson guilty, especially Nancy (dis)Grace. She's such a repulsive person, and she and others, like Dan Abrams, lied about what Scott allegedly said to Amber one night and kept up that false narrative to boot!
So, yeah, let's make sure, I say.
@@alexhidel3732
No evidence Scott transferred Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere?
All forensic testing came back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene? They even tested the water in the boat, negative results.
Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway, the States own expert and Forensic anthropologist determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. How is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th?
Conners body was above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean? his left ear get permanently flattened against his head, and a rectangular piece of material was over it?
No animal feeding on Conner whatsoever?
Plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag.
Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
Police ignored evidence, tips and sightings that point in a completely different direction.
Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day.
No cadaver scent of Laci being dead in the boat, warehouse, truck, or home.
@@aok4418 Shut up, Peterson.
Lol!! He shpuld have already had the dth penalty!! Hes a psycho
No evidence Scott transferred Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere?
All forensic testing came back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene? They even tested the water in the boat, negative results.
Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway, the States own expert and Forensic anthropologist determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. How is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th?
Conners body was above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean? his left ear get permanently flattened against his head, and a rectangular piece of material was over it?
No animal feeding on Conner whatsoever?
Plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag.
Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
Police ignored evidence, tips and sightings that point in a completely different direction.
Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day.
No cadaver scent of Laci being dead in the boat, warehouse, truck, or home.
Is that you VideoFanatic02