I mean Hayden makes sense logically as he also just never had that form during life of being as old as he was but also not disfigured. His actual form if it reflected his age would have been pale disfigured and missing 3 limbs. I’m pretty sure Shaw was also too old and didn’t reflect the age correctly anyways.
As someone who grew up on the original version, first time I saw the DVD re-release with Hayden..... I loved it! It was great seeing a character that we had been watching throughout the prequels turn from light to dark... seeing how tragic his character was to see him there fully redeemed, it was beautiful! Even seeing him in Ahsoka as a force ghost was fantastic as well. I still love both versions.
I always assumed that force ghosts can control what they look like, and Anakin decided to make himself look like as he did before he burned on Mustafar. Obi-Wan and Yoda didn't know this.
A normal old version of him never existed. That's been my reasoning for a while. The Senate building and temple weren't added, the whole planet and the celebration period was added, along with all the other planets.
I definitely feel that would have a lot more of a mixed reaction, considering Alec Guinness had a prominent role as Ben Kenobi in the OT, not only that but that wouldn't line up in canon with him having a young appearance as a force ghost
Yoda and Obi-Wan never turned evil, so there's really no reason why they should revert to a younger self that was never corrupted by the dark side in the first place...
Shaw was far too old for Anakin anyway!! He was 45 when he died, not an old man!! And as this was the point he turned, it makes perfect sense he would appear as his younger self…🤷🏻♀️
Indeed. Shaw was great for the scene where Luke takes off Vader's mask, but he never made sense as the Force Ghost of a man who died in his mid-40s. Which was in direct contradiction with what had been clearly established in the movies: Anakin was still very young when he became Vader ("a *young* pupil of mine..."), and it happened not long before the twins were born, which is why Obi-Wan and Yoda had to hide the babies in haste for fear the Emperor would find out that Anakin had offsprings. Seeing as Luke and Leia are canonically 23 in ROTJ, if we do the math there's no way Anakin could have been older than 45-50 tops when he died.
"Because he's the chosen one" - yeah lazy answer to all the plot holes. No. It doesnt make sense because when Vader removed his helmet and saw Luke - he was Anakin again, he was redeemed. Of course young Anakin is more appealing and iconic. Also more pleasant to see rather than burns n scars. They might do it to avoid graphic contents. Idk. It just doesn't make sense.
cuz he's hotter that way lol. i just always thought cuz as a lightside being he 'stopped existing' young and force ghosts are light side beings and all.
Why do I remember darth Vader in the full suit when I first saw it. Mandela affect maybe or happy Gilmore when the gator pops up at the end with chubs is getting me confused
Well, Sebastian’s would be more accurate because Vader turned back from the Dark Side to the good, and therefore he was again truly Anakin. The worst edition of all is still adding a moving head and squeaking sound to Sarlacc given that the creature digested its pray over a 1000 years, which means it would have an extremely slow metabolism and it would not have much physical energy for movement. I like the original Return of the Jedi version better, it’s the only one in my view that got ruined with the retouches.
I like Sebastian Shaw as a Force ghost really because it makes some sense because he died Older not younger I thought and Sebastian Shaw did a good job playing Older Ghost Anakin In Episode yes I agree.. but I also like Hayden Christensen as the force ghost because it makes a lot more sense because that’s where he left off before he became Darth Vader and before he was burned! And he had Longer Hair too.. and I like that a little bit more.. but hey I like Sebastian as a force ghost too yea
I mean to be fair shaw made no logical sense. Anakin wouldn't have known what he would have looked like non disfigured at that age and also wasn't non disfigured. Shaw was also too old and didn't correctly reflect his age anyways.
Hayden makes even less sense because how would Luke even know who that is. Shaw age isn’t an issue considering that yoda is an example that you can still be strong at an old as long you’re strong with the force.
@@PainKiller18775 I like how you ignored the first point and also what I meant about it not reflecting his age is that he wouldn’t have looked that old. Vader was 45 and Shaw was in his 70’s. Also luke wouldn’t have known who it was regardless. Also the only appearance he would have been able to take that would be of his current age would be the gray limbless charred corpse he was without his suit. All in all the shaw appearance just wouldn’t even be possible.
@@Greenhawk4 Age wouldn’t be a problem if Lucas didn’t make the characters so young in the prequels, it’s fine if Shaw was in his seventies considering that was the intention at the time. In the original cut it was clear that was Anakin because the communication was there. Throwing in Hayden makes it even confusing. Lastly, any bodily harm wouldn’t appear in ghost form and that’s shown through obi wan’s form because he would probably appear like he was cut in half.
@@PainKiller18775 Obi-wan was never cut in half he became one with the force the second the saber made bodily contact and even then like the first point you keep ignoring he wouldn’t know what he would have looked like at that age without his injuries. It also wouldn’t make sense for his Hayden form to have the injuries because it’s his form before he turned to the dark side and before he was severely injured.
@@Greenhawk4 I know Obi wan wasn’t exactly cut in half but my point exactly that was well communicated why bodily harm wouldn’t show. I have to respond to your first point. Even audiences were able to tell that was Anakin because the context was there. He converted to the light side at that age. What do you mean he does’t look the same? Yea he’s got make up on as Vader but it’s the same actor with the same eyes, Luke can tell because they do look the same. Showing Hayden with his young face and long hair confusing for both Luke and the audiences of they’re watching the original trilogy first(which is how you should watch Star Wars if you haven’t) and it contradicts what we saw before.
I personally prefer hayden, but mostly because I grew up with the prequels, I feel like changing it from Sebastian shaw discredits Anakins final redemption.
So millennials like most things that the world only started when their existence started. The reason he’s younger is because the older and real force ghost is now dead and he needed the younger one for further films. One day the stupid will just stay quiet
![Anakin Faces Obi-Wan in the Force after his Death [Canon]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/iKyqRI3_C0o/mqdefault.jpg)
![Anakin Faces Obi-Wan in the Force after his Death [Canon]](/img/tr.png)
Which do you prefer? Hayden Christensen or Sebastian Shaw as Anakin?
Hayden
Definitely Hayden
Hayden there isn't any other actor on this planet that I can picture for this role ,Hayden Christensen was perfectly chosen
I mean Hayden makes sense logically as he also just never had that form during life of being as old as he was but also not disfigured. His actual form if it reflected his age would have been pale disfigured and missing 3 limbs. I’m pretty sure Shaw was also too old and didn’t reflect the age correctly anyways.
Hayden
Makes sense. This was his physical appearance before he turned into Vader. I liked the idea.
As someone who grew up on the original version, first time I saw the DVD re-release with Hayden..... I loved it! It was great seeing a character that we had been watching throughout the prequels turn from light to dark... seeing how tragic his character was to see him there fully redeemed, it was beautiful! Even seeing him in Ahsoka as a force ghost was fantastic as well.
I still love both versions.
I liked both, I liked Sebastian as he was the first, but I have to admit I like the younger Anakin
I always assumed that force ghosts can control what they look like, and Anakin decided to make himself look like as he did before he burned on Mustafar.
Obi-Wan and Yoda didn't know this.
I love the explanation, really shows his redemption
Glad you enjoyed!
I bet when Anakin appeared to Leia as a Force Ghost in the Legends novel Truce at Bakura. Readers back in 1993 imagined Shaw in his place.
Hayden is my favorite, so go with him.
A normal old version of him never existed. That's been my reasoning for a while.
The Senate building and temple weren't added, the whole planet and the celebration period was added, along with all the other planets.
The Senate building and temple were both added in 2004. The planet of Coruscant was added in 1997.
@@VadersOrder added even before TPM? I'm a SW nerd, but I somehow never knew that. 😅
@@ARandomInternetUser08 Yeah! 2004 included some of the larger changes to the film but the recent time they went back was in 2019 even!
0:35 Not the original actor who portrayed him on screen. That was David Prowse. George got Shaw to do the mask removal and death scene. That's all.
Give them a chance to make another set of special editions and they'll make Ewan McGregor Obiwan's force ghost too.
I definitely feel that would have a lot more of a mixed reaction, considering Alec Guinness had a prominent role as Ben Kenobi in the OT, not only that but that wouldn't line up in canon with him having a young appearance as a force ghost
Yoda and Obi-Wan never turned evil, so there's really no reason why they should revert to a younger self that was never corrupted by the dark side in the first place...
Shaw was far too old for Anakin anyway!! He was 45 when he died, not an old man!! And as this was the point he turned, it makes perfect sense he would appear as his younger self…🤷🏻♀️
Indeed. Shaw was great for the scene where Luke takes off Vader's mask, but he never made sense as the Force Ghost of a man who died in his mid-40s. Which was in direct contradiction with what had been clearly established in the movies: Anakin was still very young when he became Vader ("a *young* pupil of mine..."), and it happened not long before the twins were born, which is why Obi-Wan and Yoda had to hide the babies in haste for fear the Emperor would find out that Anakin had offsprings.
Seeing as Luke and Leia are canonically 23 in ROTJ, if we do the math there's no way Anakin could have been older than 45-50 tops when he died.
Its confirmed Anakin is the new Bemjamin Button lol
"Because he's the chosen one" - yeah lazy answer to all the plot holes.
No. It doesnt make sense because when Vader removed his helmet and saw Luke - he was Anakin again, he was redeemed.
Of course young Anakin is more appealing and iconic. Also more pleasant to see rather than burns n scars. They might do it to avoid graphic contents. Idk. It just doesn't make sense.
cuz he's hotter that way lol. i just always thought cuz as a lightside being he 'stopped existing' young and force ghosts are light side beings and all.
cause they wanna have hayden christensen in this series. that’s it. thanks.
Hayden Christensen.. but I grew up on the prequels so I'm biased
Why do I remember darth Vader in the full suit when I first saw it. Mandela affect maybe or happy Gilmore when the gator pops up at the end with chubs is getting me confused
Because he's the chosen one? Okay I guess.
Well, Sebastian’s would be more accurate because Vader turned back from the Dark Side to the good, and therefore he was again truly Anakin. The worst edition of all is still adding a moving head and squeaking sound to Sarlacc given that the creature digested its pray over a 1000 years, which means it would have an extremely slow metabolism and it would not have much physical energy for movement. I like the original Return of the Jedi version better, it’s the only one in my view that got ruined with the retouches.
What if they once again reshot this scene as Hayden's now around the same age as Darth Vader was in RotJ
made my girlfriend watch through all of the films recently and she started balling her eyes out seeing young anakin
I lke the change
Lucas said it was to help merge the sequels to prequels.
I like Sebastian Shaw as a Force ghost really because it makes some sense because he died Older not younger I thought and Sebastian Shaw did a good job playing Older Ghost Anakin In Episode yes I agree.. but I also like Hayden Christensen as the force ghost because it makes a lot more sense because that’s where he left off before he became Darth Vader and before he was burned! And he had Longer Hair too.. and I like that a little bit more.. but hey I like Sebastian as a force ghost too yea
and Why does he wear a differents clothes in Return of Jedi and Ashoka ?
I mean to be fair shaw made no logical sense. Anakin wouldn't have known what he would have looked like non disfigured at that age and also wasn't non disfigured. Shaw was also too old and didn't correctly reflect his age anyways.
Hayden makes even less sense because how would Luke even know who that is. Shaw age isn’t an issue considering that yoda is an example that you can still be strong at an old as long you’re strong with the force.
@@PainKiller18775 I like how you ignored the first point and also what I meant about it not reflecting his age is that he wouldn’t have looked that old. Vader was 45 and Shaw was in his 70’s. Also luke wouldn’t have known who it was regardless. Also the only appearance he would have been able to take that would be of his current age would be the gray limbless charred corpse he was without his suit. All in all the shaw appearance just wouldn’t even be possible.
@@Greenhawk4 Age wouldn’t be a problem if Lucas didn’t make the characters so young in the prequels, it’s fine if Shaw was in his seventies considering that was the intention at the time. In the original cut it was clear that was Anakin because the communication was there. Throwing in Hayden makes it even confusing. Lastly, any bodily harm wouldn’t appear in ghost form and that’s shown through obi wan’s form because he would probably appear like he was cut in half.
@@PainKiller18775 Obi-wan was never cut in half he became one with the force the second the saber made bodily contact and even then like the first point you keep ignoring he wouldn’t know what he would have looked like at that age without his injuries. It also wouldn’t make sense for his Hayden form to have the injuries because it’s his form before he turned to the dark side and before he was severely injured.
@@Greenhawk4 I know Obi wan wasn’t exactly cut in half but my point exactly that was well communicated why bodily harm wouldn’t show. I have to respond to your first point. Even audiences were able to tell that was Anakin because the context was there. He converted to the light side at that age. What do you mean he does’t look the same? Yea he’s got make up on as Vader but it’s the same actor with the same eyes, Luke can tell because they do look the same. Showing Hayden with his young face and long hair confusing for both Luke and the audiences of they’re watching the original trilogy first(which is how you should watch Star Wars if you haven’t) and it contradicts what we saw before.
I personally prefer hayden, but mostly because I grew up with the prequels, I feel like changing it from Sebastian shaw discredits Anakins final redemption.
Becauase.....Lucas. #justiceforshaw. 😆
So millennials like most things that the world only started when their existence started. The reason he’s younger is because the older and real force ghost is now dead and he needed the younger one for further films. One day the stupid will just stay quiet
Tf?
@@ARandomInternetUser08 😂😂😂😂😂🔔🔚
@@geddoyle7629 and what's that supposed to mean?
He appears young for fan service.
Absolutely nonsense reasoning.