Thanks for a great podcast. Nice to see all three on you on this one. I agree on the “defanging” on Chevron, and now, if the Federal government steps back to leave this to the States, there’s certainly going to be more uncertainty, which ultimately exacerbates the risks of compliance in the already uncertain domain that is AI. On the other hand, I’m less sure about the “Rip & Replace” of Federal agencies, since if there’s anything that bureaucracies are good at, it’s survival. With regard to the EU and the rest of the world, I personally don’t think it’s going to be the default regime, notwithstanding the “Brussels Effect”, as innovation (talent, money and ideas) will migrate to “easier” jurisdictions, and that will ultimately have some countervailing effect, but we’ll see. Exciting times ahead.
![Global Capitalism: The U.S. Election and Trump 2.0 in Historical Perspective [November 2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0-WR6Zq7Qec/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for a great podcast. Nice to see all three on you on this one. I agree on the “defanging” on Chevron, and now, if the Federal government steps back to leave this to the States, there’s certainly going to be more uncertainty, which ultimately exacerbates the risks of compliance in the already uncertain domain that is AI. On the other hand, I’m less sure about the “Rip & Replace” of Federal agencies, since if there’s anything that bureaucracies are good at, it’s survival. With regard to the EU and the rest of the world, I personally don’t think it’s going to be the default regime, notwithstanding the “Brussels Effect”, as innovation (talent, money and ideas) will migrate to “easier” jurisdictions, and that will ultimately have some countervailing effect, but we’ll see. Exciting times ahead.