@@DIMASIO. гугли новость о 14го ноября 2017го, когда минобороны выложило скриншот из игры якобы доказывающий связь игил и США. это другое, мистер пиздабол? тут понимать надо?
Initial sources claimed it was a Ukrainian plane shooting at a Russian drone, and not at a Russian jet fighter. Also, it wasn't a dogfight, but a Shoot-and-scoot action. In an actual dogfight you don't shoot short range missile, and disengage, because if an enemy plane is close to you, and you turn back, he will outmaneuver you and you will die.
@@theendoftheline Where exactly is the truth in this video? These just look like 2 different clips put together. You don't see a Russian aircraft besides the Ukranian one and you can hear the missile exploding shortly after it's fired. But they couldn't film the Russian aircraft getting ''hit''? Seems like this is just another Ukranian-propaganda piece. Which if you believe doesn't exist, then you're not any better than the Russian ''bots''
It's definitely not an R-73, it is coming off of one of the the pylons that are near the mid wing, which are not capable of carrying the R-73, the only stations that can carry those on the Su-27 are the tip stations and the ones immediatelly inboard of them, from where it looks to be coming off the aircraft, I would say it's more likely to be an R-27, and since the aircraft turns away and can't be supporting it by its radar, it must be either an R-27T or R-27TE, the IR variants of those missiles.
@@henrybourgeois9484 probably not, you can vaguely see forward fins which the R-77 lacks and it has larger tail controls which more fit the R-27 series. all in my opinion
@@henrybourgeois9484 Ukraine had extremely limited numbers of R77 before the war since russia took majority of them after the fall of the union (crazy cus R77 was developed in ukraine)
The maneuvering isn't consistent with BFM. This isn't a dogfight as the mis-informative title states. It was probably shooting something unmanned like a drone or loiter munition.
The missile could be an R73. It does look stout and that would fit the short range missile size (9ft). The HARM anti radiation missiles is 14 ft long. Both can be carried on the second pylon from wing tip. He doesn't deploy flares so his target likely didn't see him or was running. Yet he turns cold in the opposite direction incase he needed to evade
Ok ok ok, this video is very misleading. The Su-27 is not a "weak plane." Kyiv simply does not want to risk their limited supply of aircraft and pilots to Russian air defenses. Both Russian and Ukrainian aircraft operate inside their respected air defenses for a reason.
@@fantomeagle5500 Ukrainians are going to do what Ukrainians do in Ukraine. If you have a problem with Ukraine then don't go to Ukraine, but if you haven't been to Ukraine then how can you say there is no Ukraine. I personally think Ukraine is pretty nice and the Ukrainians are great people. In case you didn't know Ukraine and Russia are both in Europe. But Ukraine itself is very Ukrainian...... Ukraine.... Cheers
Over Kherson last month, we saw something similar - other observers on the ground called my attention to approaching jets which appeared to be from different directions. A succession of bangs told me that at least one of the pilots had selected full afterburner as he came into view, relatively low over the city and in a hard-over bank. He dropped out of view but the second aircraft, also either a MiG-29 or SU-27, took a more direct line across much of the visible sky (again, obscured by buildings as the two aircraft remained quite low) before the lower aircraft attempted an AA missile shot. From our vantage point, the missile did not track on the enemy a/c and simply corkscrewed away in a straight line. This was the only air-to-air engagement we witnessed in 34 days, but plenty of air activity, primarily missile overflights.
in this video, the plane is flying well below any speed a dogfight would occur at. I would expect an expert to mention that. We also see no clear target being hit, only the sound of the r-73 airbursting as they do when there is no lock registered.
Both Russia and Ukraine have fairly equal control (or lack of control) over the skies, and is probably the only battlefield where the fight is equal. Russia has the technology advantage but isn't willing to throw their expensive aircraft into the fray, and Ukraine wants to preserve what they have left. Coupled with the fact both countries have enormous networks of SAM coverage, and it makes sense why they'd rather have drones and stand off missiles do the work. It also explains why most helos and fighters on AG duty hug the ground
какие-то дам догфайты себе понапридумывали, eбанутые 🤣🤣еще смешнее будет лицезреть их тотальный aхуй от официальной сдачи крыма и донбасса россии, ведь "kak je tak, slavaukraina was winning this entire time" 🤣🤣🤣
R-73 is a short range missile. And here we don't see what he fired it at. Why didn't the man behind camera follow it through? Plus, he is very lightly armed with short range missiles only. Wouldn't it make more sense ta have at least medium range missiles, especially since Russians use those (R-77, active radar homing) and even long range (R-37M, hypersonic) as well as long range SAM systems... On top of it all, we don't even see the decals to verify this is even a Ukrainian plane to start with... Most likely, this a footage from earlier, during some exercise...
@@finality4795 what's the point you're trying to make? The Russian state seemed to think that their prisoners are worth less than Ukrainian bullets so should they not fire on them either? You do realise those prisoners would've taken over the Ukrainian positions and that drone (or whatever it is, but probably a drone) would potentially target an ammo dump, tank, etc
Not really believable if that was a Russian fighter jet the ukrainian jet never would of got the shot off in the first place. Would be little pieces all over the countryside.
I dont imagine dogfights today happen nearly as much as in ww2 and that if they do happen they are much farther apart from eachother. Much much farther.
that's not dogfighting, but called beyond visual range combat. Your radar detects a boogie, you launch a missile where the radar is looking at, say to the missile "go your own way" and the missile keeps looking at the enemy with it's own built in radar while you fly away.
Neither side wants to approach the front. The Ukrainians have the challenge of Russian AWACS vectoring interceptors with long range missiles at them from high altitudes. Most miss, but a hit is a hit and percentages will grind you down.
It's likely targeting a orlan-10 drone. It's been recorded a fare bit how they will use short range air to air missiles to shoot them down. It's not a AGM-88 as they would be way higher to maximize range as they try to fire them at safe distances.
I suspect it is firing at a Heli as it has not used Counter Measures and circling this way is coming back to check the kill. The Heat Seeker and low altitude go hand in hand for sneeky tactics. Else they would not waste a Heat Seeker.
@@hdvrNG That is NOT how you do BVR dude. You need SPEED + ALTITUDE so you can CRANK. I guess we both play DCS and we are adding our own take on it but the smoke trail is showing Heat Seeker. That is how we look for them both in game and IRL. The slow speed already plus a full turn means he is not engaging a Dog Fight Plane but shows it must therefore be a slow mover.
No modern air force would "dog fight" with an opposing jet fighter... ever. They haven't done anything like that since the 60-80s when beyond visual range missiles became a thing. Opposing fighter jets shoot their long range missiles at each other and then turn and run away.
Ukraine has lost over 20 figther jets over the last week due to Russians Using stealth figther with new anti radar coating and long range (400 km)air to air missiles. It seems that the US AWACS fail to see them and therefor can't warn the Ukranian pilots in advance. Surviving Ukranian pilots tells they got no warning from their systems before being hit.
Umm… A SU-27 firing at a RUSSIAN aircraft??? The Ukrainians don’t have SU-27’s! They have MiG-29’s. This is a RUSSIAN SU-27 firing at a UKRAINIAN aircraft!!!
After the launch the aircraft appears to carry nothing on its hardpoints except at the wingtips, video cuts, suddenly it carries a single ordnance on one of the hardpoints.
No pre-emptive countermeasures by the shooter. Looks more like how you'd engage a drone. From those outer pylons on the Su-27 it's likely to be an R-73 short range heat seeker (like late models of the US AIM-9 Sidewinder family) rather than an R-27R radar guided or R-27T IR guided missile which are launched from an inner pylon or the fuselage. Plus, with the shooter turning away before the missile hit it is not going to be a R-27R which requires the launch aircraft to illuminate the target (it is not "fire and forget" like later R-77 missiles and the US AIM-120 Amraam series).
Guys please vote for Ukraine STOP fighting you guys have a lot of losses you are not going to be a part of NATO what are you dying for this is not fair
Okay. So then ( and, please, I am NOT! A war/ battle strategist! I. REPEAT!!! I am - NOT! . . . NOT, NOT, NOT! a war/ battle strategist, nor am I a politician. But " I LOVE MY COUNTRY, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA !!! " YEAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
Where's this so called "dogfight?" Usually, a dogfight is between at least 2 airplanes. All I see in this video is a single solitary plane flying around. What a joke!
Turning away after firing a missile at an enemy fighter is the dumbest way to die. So that missile was definitely not fired towards an enemy fighter, and most likely meant for a drone.
This aint a dogfight, the jet that fired the missile and retreated. Dog fights are when both jets meet face to face and stay the battle. Plus ukraine jets are not weak. They just dont have the latest features other jets have.
Look like it flying radar avoiding at low altitude, but don't use flares. It's probably near front but not over russian held territory and whatever it fired at, no IR missile seem to be expected right back, but something radar guided.
This video shows nothing. Only shows one aircraft that fires a missile and very calmly makes a steep turn the other way and a few other calm turns after that. Not a dogfight. Could be a training exorcise. Who knows?
Dog fights aren't a thing anymore. Jets can be miles away, fire a missile and then call it a day. Air Superiority is too important and losing your fighter jets to meaningless jet vs jet combat is costly. Ground units are far better at taking out fighter jets anyway.
First, they showed footage from the military flight simulator DCS World. I know the graphical features of this game very well. This is evidenced by the overly stable camera and smooth image, as well as some shaders, smoke from rocket engines, etc. Also, the sound is orchestrated in the same way as in this simulator.
''Ukraine's jets are generally weaker.'' Russia and Ukraine use the same jets. Su-27 and Su-25. They are the same. Ukraine's Su-27's are not weaker than the Russians, apart from maybe limited armament. But i don't see why they would be *weaker*
I love how ex/pilots, mechanics and people that nerd out on these beastly machines come up with more of a logical response vs Daily Mail's claims. Don't try to mislead these enthusiasts, it will never work.
Who said that Russia have few pilots , please come forwards and look at how many fighter pilots are graduating each year. More than 200 are being trained each year. I say each year not in total. How many planes could Kiev regime shot down?
We have a surplus of retired A 10 Warthog anti tank close ground support aircraft. Less of a learning curve than the F-16, and we are not sending them to Ukraine. Really how stupid is that?
NOT an aircraft. That's click bait. To low - mostly likely either a cruise missile or a drone. Especially considering how quickly after launch you hear the bang.
Daily Mails level of ‘dogfight’ expertise is beyond range 😂
Как они ещё не умудрились показать ролики из игры ARMA как это делали нацистская украина и нацистский израиль 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@DIMASIO. гугли новость о 14го ноября 2017го, когда минобороны выложило скриншот из игры якобы доказывающий связь игил и США. это другое, мистер пиздабол? тут понимать надо?
@@DIMASIO. and how are they nazis, orc?
also, this clip is from a video game....
No it is absolutely not. @@RustyB5000
Initial sources claimed it was a Ukrainian plane shooting at a Russian drone, and not at a Russian jet fighter.
Also, it wasn't a dogfight, but a Shoot-and-scoot action. In an actual dogfight you don't shoot short range missile, and disengage, because if an enemy plane is close to you, and you turn back, he will outmaneuver you and you will die.
You would also expose your engine to enemy short range missiles = instant death I suppose.
Imagine being so dumb you think this is real life and not a DCS World PC game.
Hey! it's boomer news, you gotta believe what you is fed on the television 🤣
Yep that plane is targeting some low flying object and the pilot is not worried to even merge with the possible agresor. That is not a dogfight.
So You are a pilot in ukraine battlefields
this is the perfect representation of what people hate in modern media
News is what you want. Everyone here knows the difference or should. It is TH-cam! Ask a friend.
This is the perfect representation of what (russian) people hate in modern media: Truth
@@theendoftheline Where exactly is the truth in this video? These just look like 2 different clips put together. You don't see a Russian aircraft besides the Ukranian one and you can hear the missile exploding shortly after it's fired. But they couldn't film the Russian aircraft getting ''hit''? Seems like this is just another Ukranian-propaganda piece. Which if you believe doesn't exist, then you're not any better than the Russian ''bots''
@@theendofthelineso you're saying that a shoot and scoot is a dogfight? Are you saying that the su27 is weak? Or what
@@Sceptre1-1 or maybe what I typed was what I typed. Truth.
im so glad people are calling out their bs
It's definitely not an R-73, it is coming off of one of the the pylons that are near the mid wing, which are not capable of carrying the R-73, the only stations that can carry those on the Su-27 are the tip stations and the ones immediatelly inboard of them, from where it looks to be coming off the aircraft, I would say it's more likely to be an R-27, and since the aircraft turns away and can't be supporting it by its radar, it must be either an R-27T or R-27TE, the IR variants of those missiles.
Could it not have been an R-77 in that case?
@@henrybourgeois9484 probably not, you can vaguely see forward fins which the R-77 lacks and it has larger tail controls which more fit the R-27 series. all in my opinion
@@henrybourgeois9484 Ukraine had extremely limited numbers of R77 before the war since russia took majority of them after the fall of the union (crazy cus R77 was developed in ukraine)
@@tato300 Ah gotcha
@@henrybourgeois9484 Pretty sure Ukraine only has access to older semi-automatic and IR seeker R-27s.
Can't be a dog fight, the pilot defends by turning away the moment he fires the missile.
The maneuvering isn't consistent with BFM. This isn't a dogfight as the mis-informative title states. It was probably shooting something unmanned like a drone or loiter munition.
Bit of correction here, but engaging in BVR does not count as dogfight. Dogfights are when planes engage within visual range.
an R73 isnt a BVR missile so it couldn't have been
this wasnt bvr it was close range
if he was bvr he wouldnt be launching a missile on the deck lmao
@@skeletonjamyes he would because otherwise you would get shot down by sam's if you go too high.
@@lurtzy_ he wouldn't be bvr fighting above sam sites lol
The missile could be an R73. It does look stout and that would fit the short range missile size (9ft). The HARM anti radiation missiles is 14 ft long. Both can be carried on the second pylon from wing tip.
He doesn't deploy flares so his target likely didn't see him or was running.
Yet he turns cold in the opposite direction incase he needed to evade
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 1:09 😅😊😊
@@tiadiad you're welcome 😊
He seem flying low, radar avoiding. Probably near frontline on UA territory
@@tiadiad Play a few weeks of DCS and you would know this as well, chief.
Ok Biggles.
🇺🇦Glory to Ukraine! 🇺🇦Death to the enemy! 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 Бандера герой. Bandera is a hero ❤
This biggest problem the Russian air force has is Russian SAM operators.
Why???
@@joelc9439 No training or coordination just like they shot down a civilian airliner many years ago and cheered until they saw the wreck.
@@joelc9439 because of Wodka abuse
Ok ok ok, this video is very misleading. The Su-27 is not a "weak plane." Kyiv simply does not want to risk their limited supply of aircraft and pilots to Russian air defenses. Both Russian and Ukrainian aircraft operate inside their respected air defenses for a reason.
Хватит писать украинские
украинского ничего не осталось
Это американские и европейские
@@fantomeagle5500 Ukrainians are going to do what Ukrainians do in Ukraine. If you have a problem with Ukraine then don't go to Ukraine, but if you haven't been to Ukraine then how can you say there is no Ukraine. I personally think Ukraine is pretty nice and the Ukrainians are great people. In case you didn't know Ukraine and Russia are both in Europe. But Ukraine itself is very Ukrainian...... Ukraine.... Cheers
@@fantomeagle5500 Ukraine
@@fantomeagle5500 Ukrainian
@@fantomeagle5500 Украина
Did Ghost of Kiev participate? 😂🤡🤡
Over Kherson last month, we saw something similar - other observers on the ground called my attention to approaching jets which appeared to be from different directions. A succession of bangs told me that at least one of the pilots had selected full afterburner as he came into view, relatively low over the city and in a hard-over bank. He dropped out of view but the second aircraft, also either a MiG-29 or SU-27, took a more direct line across much of the visible sky (again, obscured by buildings as the two aircraft remained quite low) before the lower aircraft attempted an AA missile shot. From our vantage point, the missile did not track on the enemy a/c and simply corkscrewed away in a straight line. This was the only air-to-air engagement we witnessed in 34 days, but plenty of air activity, primarily missile overflights.
Great first hand info. Thanks 👍🏼
in this video, the plane is flying well below any speed a dogfight would occur at. I would expect an expert to mention that. We also see no clear target being hit, only the sound of the r-73 airbursting as they do when there is no lock registered.
Both Russia and Ukraine have fairly equal control (or lack of control) over the skies, and is probably the only battlefield where the fight is equal. Russia has the technology advantage but isn't willing to throw their expensive aircraft into the fray, and Ukraine wants to preserve what they have left. Coupled with the fact both countries have enormous networks of SAM coverage, and it makes sense why they'd rather have drones and stand off missiles do the work. It also explains why most helos and fighters on AG duty hug the ground
aztakurva :D és akkor láttad meg az orosz kém műholdat. Ugye?
🇺🇦Glory to Ukraine! 🇺🇦Death to the enemy! 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 Бандера герой. Bandera is a hero ❤
That's not a dogfight. The guy turned around and disengaged way too soon.
Coward 😅
Обожаю наивность англоязычных граждан 🤣🤣🤣
какие-то дам догфайты себе понапридумывали, eбанутые 🤣🤣еще смешнее будет лицезреть их тотальный aхуй от официальной сдачи крыма и донбасса россии, ведь "kak je tak, slavaukraina was winning this entire time" 🤣🤣🤣
Look at you?? WTF 😀😀😀😀 bloody BOT! Dare you to speak your embarrassing language where I live????? You wouldn’t last 2 minutes SICKO RUSKIES
Они верят во всё,что им скажут или покажут.
R-73 is a short range missile. And here we don't see what he fired it at. Why didn't the man behind camera follow it through? Plus, he is very lightly armed with short range missiles only. Wouldn't it make more sense ta have at least medium range missiles, especially since Russians use those (R-77, active radar homing) and even long range (R-37M, hypersonic) as well as long range SAM systems...
On top of it all, we don't even see the decals to verify this is even a Ukrainian plane to start with...
Most likely, this a footage from earlier, during some exercise...
Just show off after having lost most of the jets in the last week.
By the slow speed of the aircraft it's obvious that the target is a drone - most likely a Shahed.
Finally, Andrew the war expert finally arrived
that missile cost more than the Shahed drone
lmfao, you won the internet today@@Watchembleed211
@@finality4795 what's the point you're trying to make? The Russian state seemed to think that their prisoners are worth less than Ukrainian bullets so should they not fire on them either? You do realise those prisoners would've taken over the Ukrainian positions and that drone (or whatever it is, but probably a drone) would potentially target an ammo dump, tank, etc
Why video games are here? This channel deserves report for misinformation
this is actually footage showing a ukrainian jet firing on a russian drone
It’s actually video game footage soooo okay
@@3dprintmiamii want that game. How is it called?
@@Amradar123 digital combat simulator. It’s fantastic. Though the foliage and cloud renderings are CLEARLY not real.
@@3dprintmiami
Your brain is a video game.
@@a564-c3q wow, shockingly creative for someone whose username is user…
this is a ukrainian jet firing at the sun.
Not really believable if that was a Russian fighter jet the ukrainian jet never would of got the shot off in the first place. Would be little pieces all over the countryside.
I thought the Ghost of Kyiv shot down all of the Russian jets?
Presumably and probably eh?
Fact: Russia recently took down 7 Ukro aircraft in one day and 15 over a week.
I dont imagine dogfights today happen nearly as much as in ww2 and that if they do happen they are much farther apart from eachother. Much much farther.
that's not dogfighting, but called beyond visual range combat. Your radar detects a boogie, you launch a missile where the radar is looking at, say to the missile "go your own way" and the missile keeps looking at the enemy with it's own built in radar while you fly away.
Isn't this just another blasted video game clickbait?
Very misleading, this isn't a dogfight and I don't have to be an expert.
Neither side wants to approach the front. The Ukrainians have the challenge of Russian AWACS vectoring interceptors with long range missiles at them from high altitudes. Most miss, but a hit is a hit and percentages will grind you down.
Авакс не перехватчик. Это летающая РЛС , наводить он не может
@@Ruinskiy АВАКС - радиолокационный директор перехватчиков МиГ-31.
It's likely targeting a orlan-10 drone. It's been recorded a fare bit how they will use short range air to air missiles to shoot them down. It's not a AGM-88 as they would be way higher to maximize range as they try to fire them at safe distances.
Yes he seem flying radar avoiding.
😂😂😂. Потери Украины посмотри. Украина не никогда и нигде не побеждала. А, вашу технику продаёт
Попытки пририсовать хоть какую нибудь победу украине, уже смотрятся все более комичными
I suspect it is firing at a Heli as it has not used Counter Measures and circling this way is coming back to check the kill. The Heat Seeker and low altitude go hand in hand for sneeky tactics. Else they would not waste a Heat Seeker.
Может по беспилотнику
@@hdvrNG That is NOT how you do BVR dude. You need SPEED + ALTITUDE so you can CRANK. I guess we both play DCS and we are adding our own take on it but the smoke trail is showing Heat Seeker. That is how we look for them both in game and IRL. The slow speed already plus a full turn means he is not engaging a Dog Fight Plane but shows it must therefore be a slow mover.
Dog fight in the laundry mat you mean?
Ukraine lost most of
It's airforce last week
slava ukraini
This was not a Dogfight! Nice try clowns
Video says nothing and is open to massive interpretation on so many levels - no credibility as to the title
No modern air force would "dog fight" with an opposing jet fighter... ever. They haven't done anything like that since the 60-80s when beyond visual range missiles became a thing. Opposing fighter jets shoot their long range missiles at each other and then turn and run away.
Ukraine has lost over 20 figther jets over the last week due to Russians Using stealth figther with new anti radar coating and long range (400 km)air to air missiles.
It seems that the US AWACS fail to see them and therefor can't warn the Ukranian pilots in advance.
Surviving Ukranian pilots tells they got no warning from their systems before being hit.
20 fighter jets over the last week? Where the hell did you hear that from lmao
more propaganda sweet
Ukraine lost. Russia won. No surprise.
Really? How come Putin ain't doing a victory parade in the Ukrainian capital with the world's press invited to film him dancing on a podium.
I have to admit the Su27 is one of the better designed soviet era fighter plane. I have a model kit of it.
Расскажи это жевтоблакытным свинохрюкам
Oh dear!
So you're a credible expert then.
How would it do against a F16 ?
@@hb-ol9oc the question is which F16, it wouldn't do great against newest model, su 27 is late 70s aircraft and with no updates can't do a lot
Umm… A SU-27 firing at a RUSSIAN aircraft??? The Ukrainians don’t have SU-27’s! They have MiG-29’s. This is a RUSSIAN SU-27 firing at a UKRAINIAN aircraft!!!
This wouldn't happen in Soviet times
Propaganda for the blank check receiving Ukrainians.
A dog fight between jets? This low? With this low amount of speed?? Nope, not buying it.
After the launch the aircraft appears to carry nothing on its hardpoints except at the wingtips, video cuts, suddenly it carries a single ordnance on one of the hardpoints.
ECM
No pre-emptive countermeasures by the shooter. Looks more like how you'd engage a drone. From those outer pylons on the Su-27 it's likely to be an R-73 short range heat seeker (like late models of the US AIM-9 Sidewinder family) rather than an R-27R radar guided or R-27T IR guided missile which are launched from an inner pylon or the fuselage. Plus, with the shooter turning away before the missile hit it is not going to be a R-27R which requires the launch aircraft to illuminate the target (it is not "fire and forget" like later R-77 missiles and the US AIM-120 Amraam series).
‘Dogfights were more common until ghost of kyiv shot down every Russian pilot’. What a joke!
And how many hours in Battlefield 2042 has this "analyst" accrued?
Rare you mean fantasy footage
Guys please vote for Ukraine STOP fighting you guys have a lot of losses you are not going to be a part of NATO what are you dying for this is not fair
OK Russian bot
Where is the enemy fighter?
His Pc crashed
Is dailymail an English first channel? Wouldn't think it from the captions.
Okay. So then ( and, please, I am NOT! A war/ battle strategist!
I. REPEAT!!!
I am - NOT! . . . NOT, NOT, NOT!
a war/ battle strategist, nor am I a politician. But " I LOVE MY COUNTRY, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA !!! "
YEAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
Who thinks Russia has few pilots....They have been preparing for this 15 years
Where's this so called "dogfight?" Usually, a dogfight is between at least 2 airplanes. All I see in this video is a single solitary plane flying around. What a joke!
Dogfights ... in that hight. Sounds qustionable ...
Turning away after firing a missile at an enemy fighter is the dumbest way to die. So that missile was definitely not fired towards an enemy fighter, and most likely meant for a drone.
I like Arma 3 as well. Name of this mod please?
Who won ?
Well cant expect much from journalist to analyize a war footage without making them look fool themself
Made in Hollywood 🤣🤣🤣
This is definitely not an r73 and not a dogfight between fighters
Watching this makes me feel like I'm watching 2 kids fight in a silly way (not hating on Ukraine and Russia just using a metaphor or something)
This aint a dogfight, the jet that fired the missile and retreated. Dog fights are when both jets meet face to face and stay the battle. Plus ukraine jets are not weak. They just dont have the latest features other jets have.
The Ghost of Kiev in action again 😅
Just stick to your childish pottery videos. You have nothing of value to add here.
I'm supposed to believe Ukraine has fighters left? lol
Russia using Russian wepons and
Ukraine is using Russian Wepons too instead of USA Wepons but
Zenlenkeyy blaming Russia Again 😂
Look like it flying radar avoiding at low altitude, but don't use flares. It's probably near front but not over russian held territory and whatever it fired at, no IR missile seem to be expected right back, but something radar guided.
Хрень
wow DCS's graphics are getting better...
Russian missile fired at a Russian plane from another Russian plane. How ironic.
This video shows nothing. Only shows one aircraft that fires a missile and very calmly makes a steep turn the other way and a few other calm turns after that. Not a dogfight. Could be a training exorcise. Who knows?
One aircraft, dogfighting, really.
Ridiculous news story.
The missile knows where it is and where it isnt
Dog fights aren't a thing anymore. Jets can be miles away, fire a missile and then call it a day. Air Superiority is too important and losing your fighter jets to meaningless jet vs jet combat is costly. Ground units are far better at taking out fighter jets anyway.
Pretty soon they won't be avoiding each other.
all DCS virtual wanna be pilots experts are here as experts.
The RAF will deal with the Russian Air Force
@@virtualhustles6916 LOL next joke
@@chrissheldon8708 uk don't have a lot of aircraft
Please learn what a actual dogfight is.
First, they showed footage from the military flight simulator DCS World. I know the graphical features of this game very well. This is evidenced by the overly stable camera and smooth image, as well as some shaders, smoke from rocket engines, etc. Also, the sound is orchestrated in the same way as in this simulator.
Who keeps saying the days of close in dogfights are over??? Your wrong...
''Ukraine's jets are generally weaker.''
Russia and Ukraine use the same jets. Su-27 and Su-25. They are the same. Ukraine's Su-27's are not weaker than the Russians, apart from maybe limited armament. But i don't see why they would be *weaker*
The Ghost of Kiev is back.
How about using honest headlines? Something like this perhaps: ”Jet (possibly Ukranian) fires some sort of missile, presumably at something…”
Arent dogfights with guns, rather than missiles
not much of a dogfight
I love how ex/pilots, mechanics and people that nerd out on these beastly machines come up with more of a logical response vs Daily Mail's claims. Don't try to mislead these enthusiasts, it will never work.
Who said that Russia have few pilots , please come forwards and look at how many fighter pilots are graduating each year. More than 200 are being trained each year. I say each year not in total. How many planes could Kiev regime shot down?
Are we sure this isn't DCS again, like half of the other "air combat" videos from this conflict have been?
exactly. anyone know for sure? it 'looks' real to me, not in the actual rendering so much as the peripherals that make it seem real.
No this is definitely real.
imagine, iran supplying russia in the war against ukraine, and also helped orchestrated the Hamas attack? is iran the new global superpower 😱😱😱
This is not DCS for sure
short range missile , no flare hmmm
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👍👍👍👍💪💪
Russia sucks.
@@mikejones6065 just like your mother
OK, But the question is did he hit anything with that missile?
clickbait we all know the truth👌
To be honest ai think this is lifted from a computer game.
To be honest, human brain is certain it is not
Ghost of Kiev?
The same dogfight that was meant to never happen again?
Clearly have no idea what a dog fight is
We have a surplus of retired A 10 Warthog anti tank close ground support aircraft. Less of a learning curve than the F-16, and we are not sending them to Ukraine. Really how stupid is that?
The a10s would just mean more complicated logistics without brining much. Ukraine already have su25 a with experienced pilots
And they need f16 to engage Russian or forces. The a10 can only carry short range sidewinders for self defence
There are no Ukrainian jets. Those are Russian jets stolen or illegally obtained (by begging) without the approval of the producer.
my dude they were ukranian because the past president was putins pawn and he got given a hole lot of them
bruh stop...
NOT an aircraft. That's click bait. To low - mostly likely either a cruise missile or a drone. Especially considering how quickly after launch you hear the bang.
Ukraine still winning? LOL.
Hows your 3 days of SMO going ivan