You literally have no idea how much help you are to alot of students everywhere. My chemistry teacher taught this topic and I didn't have any idea of what he was saying till I watched your videos. Thank you very much.
Hey everyone, I'm here to help. If you have any questions or just want to learn more, click on the link in the description above. It'll take you to a page where you can ask me questions.
sorry to be so off topic but does someone know of a way to get back into an Instagram account..? I somehow lost the login password. I appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
@Rylan Raylan I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and I'm in the hacking process now. Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
I am also a chemistry teacher but honestly, you are genius brother. i do always recommend my student to watch your clips. i would be happier if you can produce clips for advanced organic chemistry.
3:24 It is accurate, but more or less so, right? It doesn't necessarily have to be spot on to be considered "accurate". It can be relatively accurate, relative to the other groups' measurements, right? 3:51 Spot on! So both precision and accuracy is relative. I guess we can say that precision is relative to other measurements, but accuracy is relative to other measurements and to the actual target. Right?
Could you help me with this one? What do I compare the accuracy and precision to? An engineer calibrating a 100.00 μL pipette got volumes of 0.102 mL 0.098 mL, and 0.104 mL evaluate his accuracy and precision.
Thanks a lot your video really worked but I have a problem. Can you help me identify whether 1.93 and 2.05 are accurate or precise if the actual value is 2 ?
What if you have three random measurements and no way to tell if it's accurate? I have an example: Circle the number that has the best precision: 0.034 g, 123.8 g, 1.4 g. Can you determine which measurement is most accurate? How can you tell whats the most accurate if you don't know what the accurate number is?
if one of the measurements is 500 whilst the remaining are 400 and 300, considering one of the accurate measurements, i.e. 500, is the entire measurement accurate or not? And are we supposed to calculate the average to determine accuracy?
Onions? I thought we were discussing numbers. I think one needs to understand limits in order to grasp this properly. It's something that I'm studying right now. The limit is a fundamental concept of calculus. It relates to things like theory of measurement. Ask yourself, is 3 really a 3? Then is 3.000 just a 3? I would say yes, they are both "just" the number 3. Why? Because they are not actual measurements! The number 3.000 might be considered more precise than the number 3... if it were a measurement! But it's not! It's not a measurement! It's a counting number, just like "one, two, three, four" and so on. It's called a cardinal number. It's this mental image of what a "number" is, it's not a physical object or something you measure with a ruler or tape measure. So the "000" at the end of "3.000" does not add any more precision than what "3" alone does. I believe this is the reason why trailing zeros are omitted in measurements, and they are considered "non-significant" digits (or figures). Just to be clear! When you see "25 Km", you know it's a measurement! It's a measure of distance between two endpoints. The unit of measurement, the "Km", is what directly reveals that it is a measurement. (Which is why it's always important for professionals to always write out the unit.) But when you see something like "twenty five" in a written text (or you hear someone say it), or you see just "25". Then it may or may not be a measurement. Maybe they were not very professional or forgot to say that it's "twenty five feet" or "25 ft." Either that or they are actually talking about this mental image of a number, this counting or cardinal number "25".
You literally have no idea how much help you are to alot of students everywhere.
My chemistry teacher taught this topic and I didn't have any idea of what he was saying till I watched your videos.
Thank you very much.
My CHEMISTRY teacher was literally the one that recommended you to us. Thank you for helping me understand this better than my teacher taught me.
Hey everyone, I'm here to help. If you have any questions or just want to learn more, click on the link in the description above. It'll take you to a page where you can ask me questions.
best TH-cam teacher out there! I know I can always rely on Tyler!
sorry to be so off topic but does someone know of a way to get back into an Instagram account..?
I somehow lost the login password. I appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
@Diego Lukas instablaster :)
@Rylan Raylan I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and I'm in the hacking process now.
Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@Rylan Raylan it did the trick and I now got access to my account again. I'm so happy!
Thank you so much, you really help me out :D
@Diego Lukas You are welcome xD
You help me so much! Better than any school teacher.
Kavya Sivan true
I am also a chemistry teacher but honestly, you are genius brother. i do always recommend my student to watch your clips. i would be happier if you can produce clips for advanced organic chemistry.
of course, you are from teachers who don't explain anything thats why you want him to upload clips haha it is okay you are like my teachers
Best chemistry teacher on youtube all the time!!!!
Thank you so much
I have been coming across the words accuracy and precision since two years but today I understood completely. Thanks Tyler
What would I be without you sir.. Thank you so much... 100% will be mine in chemistry
You are so smart my guy..
precision, how much we should trust our measurements. Well put!
Wooow you are amazingggg teaching us, thank u soo much,you are genius
thank you, this helped a lot.
Thank you!!!!! ure going to help me get a distinction in CXC!!
Swear! Prayers are going out for u from the core of my heart may live u long sir!
3:24 It is accurate, but more or less so, right? It doesn't necessarily have to be spot on to be considered "accurate". It can be relatively accurate, relative to the other groups' measurements, right? 3:51 Spot on! So both precision and accuracy is relative. I guess we can say that precision is relative to other measurements, but accuracy is relative to other measurements and to the actual target. Right?
Thanks for the video it gave me a better understanding.
Could you help me with this one? What do I compare the accuracy and precision to?
An engineer calibrating a 100.00 μL pipette got volumes of 0.102 mL 0.098 mL, and 0.104 mL evaluate his accuracy and precision.
Thanks a lot your video really worked but I have a problem. Can you help me identify whether 1.93 and 2.05 are accurate or precise if the actual value is 2 ?
Thank you.
MY GOD THANK YOU SO MUCH YOU ARE THE BEST!!
What if you have three random measurements and no way to tell if it's accurate? I have an example: Circle the number that has the best precision: 0.034 g, 123.8 g, 1.4 g. Can you determine which measurement is most accurate?
How can you tell whats the most accurate if you don't know what the accurate number is?
The most accurate measurement would be the one with the most significant figures.
if one of the measurements is 500 whilst the remaining are 400 and 300, considering one of the accurate measurements, i.e. 500, is the entire measurement accurate or not? And are we supposed to calculate the average to determine accuracy?
How precision is determined by the position of last significant digit?
Thank you so much!
Great videos dude!!
In last measurement, average value 500.0 ft is accurate or not??
thank you!!!!!
This is education.
Hi i guess if you wanna decide if it accurate or not you need a hypothesis testing
this crazy bruh i actually understood it
thanks very much u help me
Wow explaination
in 3:48
you said 474 but it is 472 does it still count as percise?
I don't think this house should even be in this neighborhood
How can the number 3 have an infinite number of significant figures? What's the argument for that?
Pretty onions tbf, it's a number you count. It's either 3 or not 3. It can't be anything but 3. That's just how I think of it.
Onions? I thought we were discussing numbers. I think one needs to understand limits in order to grasp this properly. It's something that I'm studying right now. The limit is a fundamental concept of calculus. It relates to things like theory of measurement.
Ask yourself, is 3 really a 3? Then is 3.000 just a 3? I would say yes, they are both "just" the number 3. Why? Because they are not actual measurements! The number 3.000 might be considered more precise than the number 3... if it were a measurement! But it's not! It's not a measurement! It's a counting number, just like "one, two, three, four" and so on. It's called a cardinal number. It's this mental image of what a "number" is, it's not a physical object or something you measure with a ruler or tape measure.
So the "000" at the end of "3.000" does not add any more precision than what "3" alone does. I believe this is the reason why trailing zeros are omitted in measurements, and they are considered "non-significant" digits (or figures).
Just to be clear! When you see "25 Km", you know it's a measurement! It's a measure of distance between two endpoints. The unit of measurement, the "Km", is what directly reveals that it is a measurement. (Which is why it's always important for professionals to always write out the unit.) But when you see something like "twenty five" in a written text (or you hear someone say it), or you see just "25". Then it may or may not be a measurement. Maybe they were not very professional or forgot to say that it's "twenty five feet" or "25 ft." Either that or they are actually talking about this mental image of a number, this counting or cardinal number "25".
Samir Gunic 3.000000000000000000000000000000000000000 like this
because 3= 3.0 = 3.00 = 3.000000000000000..... Therefore number 3 is an exact number, or we can say that it has unlimited SF
in 5:45 the answer is 477.0 but my computation is 477.4?
Louie DecenA I think he rounded of this value
Happy
Quisiera ser tú.
xixi de zebra
may you accept islam