Mark Ward Article Review With All the Harshness He Deserves
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ต.ค. 2021
- #MarkWard #KJVO #TGC
Articles for Further Reading:
youngtextlessreformed.com/202...
youngtextlessreformed.com/202...
Article on Re-Inspiration KJVO:
youngtextlessreformed.com/202... - เพลง
![[ไฮไลต์] แบดมินตันหญิง "เมย์ รัชนก" ไทย vs เบลเยี่ยม รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qfMROCoiKMY/mqdefault.jpg)
When did Mark Ward become an authority over the English language? Where he can tell us what our language is? Or he can tell us what English words are still fit to be used and which are not? I guess being a self appointed authority over the scripture wasn't enough for him. The Bible version issue may be a tradition, but it's absolutely not a tradition of men. People who claim it is only reveal what a low view of scripture they really have no matter how much the profess to love it. "Yea,hath God said" sounds a lot like Mark Ward so snake is about right.
I sincerely believe Mark ward is Jesuit, seems his only ministry is to cast doubts upon the word of God , he always tells u that he has no problem with the kjv just before he tells its full of errors like a husband telling his wife he loves her while he's punching her in the face. William Branham said you are either a Bible believer or a Bible corrector,he seems to be a Bible corrector.
Can you disprove dead words and false friends?
Amen brother u hit it. SNAKE.
This is long needed.
I'm so glad I came across your channel. I feel the same way about Mark Ward. He's prideful, arrogant, and condescending. He tells us the KJV is hard to understand, and then proceeds to use big words to try and impress his audience. If he really cared, he'd be making videos to help us understand the King James and show us the differences between it and modern versions. Instead he berates the King James and its readers every chance he gets. I gotta wonder if he gets paid everytime he says "false friends", "dead words", and takes verses out of context. He is a snake, and he reminds me of a snake oil salesman. Modern versions that he pushes has done nothing but create a lukewarm church, and Christian's who are tolerant of sin. Great job with the videos, I appreciate them!
Amen. Glad others see his slimey ways.
Great show, sir. Makes a fitting segway out from Dane's party spirit sermon last week.
I will borrow a phrase from Sam Clemens, "You are a good man, Mr. Ward...in the worst possible sense".
I swear I thought I was the only one who thought he sounded very effeminate.
What a blessing this video is.
God bless you Taylor.
It's a common trait with BJU Bible types these days. Anyone with the Spirit will pick up on it right away. Makes my skin crawl.
Philippians 4:5 Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord is at hand.
Ephesians 4:26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:
Do our words fulfil these commands of God?
What is this in relation to? Thank you for the comment!
Many authors at Together for the Gospel are doing the same thing as Rob Bell. First they say I am one of you guys. Then they try to dribble you slowly to a worldly, unbelieving position. This "ministry" is confusing the faithful saints and is destroying the Church.
I love it: Every Christian has the ability to parse doctrine, because we get our doctrine from the Bible, and you don't need a Ph. D. to read the bible--thanks to the King James Version, by the way.
Not really that easy for them to refute Ruckmanite re-inspiration because they believe no perfect Bible exist anywhere. So they write entire books on the subject to force Christians into chosing from two bad options. James White said the Hebrew vowel points are not inspired. Honestly if somebody put a gun to my head and said I had to chose between the Mark Ward,Daniel Wallace,James White position or the Ruckman position. Honestly I would take the Ruckman position, because at least that position allows you to believe you have a perfect Bible. Thankfully I don't have chose between either of those options.
@Vladimir Pandovski Mark Ward: Not even once
"at least that position allows you to believe you have a perfect Bible" -- I don't get why they don't understand the need to have a perfect Bible is key.
Where does it say in the Bible that "God calls" a person to learn another language?
I thought that God (through His Spirit) gives believers the "gift" of tongues and the interpretation of them
What are your thoughts on the MEV. Is it a faithful translation since it’s from the TR?
I appreciate Jeff Riddle's review of it. His critiques were enough for me not to recommend it.
@@theyoungtextlessandreforme7113 I probably would avoid Jeff Riddles work. He is not taken seriously by scholars. He can't even tell you what TR he believes is inspired.
@@jwatson181 which scholars don't take him seriously? The ones who marched with BLM last summer? The ones who don't believe in hell? The ones who reject that the Bible exists? Further, I've had the "Which TR?" question with him in person, and yes he can.
@@theyoungtextlessandreforme7113 I will ignore the genetic fallacy. What TR does he he believe is inspired? I am thankful that he told you but it is a bit odd he kept it a secret from the rest of the world.
@@jwatson181 a genetic fallacy doesn't change the fact that the "Scholars" are all liberal theologians who don't agree with orthodoxy. Call it a fallacy if you want to put your head in the sand. He has a literal entire blog post and Word Magazine on it, if you want to stop mischaracterizing him.
I questioned Mark Ward on the number anomalies with astronomical odds that are only in the KJV.( ie 7 having an overwhelming significance of perfection and hidden throughout the text). These are not present in other versions anywhere near the extent as the kjv, He lied and told me the bible in the Urdu language has them. He later confessed that he doesn't know about Urdu and said he was "answering a fool according to his folly"
Mark Ward is a lying snake, if your ministry is about sowing doubt in God's word and not about feeding people, clothing people, visiting the sick and the imprisoned, then your ministry is not of God.
How much Gipp or Ruckman have you actually read?! The reinspiration agreement is a tired straw man. The agreement they make is that God not on had the power to inspire the originals, but the power to persevere his word. What good would it be it inspire if it was only to be lost?
Great video, brother!
How did he tie KJV Onlyism and TR Onlyism together lol? It’s two different languages mark, it’s not the same thing lol.
Um... you have to be TR only to be KJV only.
@@jwatson181 have you read anything on the topic? This is astonishingly incorrect for somebody accusing Christians of sin.
@@theyoungtextlessandreforme7113 So you believe the original TR used to translate the KJV is not inspired but the translation of it to English is inspired? That is quite the radical perspective.
@@jwatson181 I'm not a KJV Onlyist. Again, you have no idea what you're talking about.
@@theyoungtextlessandreforme7113 What is your position? Your attitude towards Mark is sinful. I hope you get your heart right.
I'm not KJVO, but I've watched several of Mark Ward's videos. He comes off as very elitist and condescending. Of course, his juicy, effeminate voice only makes it worse.
Amazing how some can't discern both in his mannerisms of oratory and in his flawed emotive reasoning he comes across as effeminate.
I agree with your assessment.
I listened a lot to Mark Ward, and I liked a lot of what he had to say. I also appreciated that if I posted a comment he would respond. But a problem developed. The ESV. I can still accept "translations" that include allegedly "errant" text, such as the "long ending of Mark." Many "translations" will retain the words, and verses while setting those versus apart, in some fashion. But at least it's still there.
Among the allegedly "most accurate" bibles is the ESV. I noticed that it chops out verses, and words- just drops them out of existence, I have the 2016 Giant Print edition. When mentioning this to Mark, he got very defensive- basically calling me a liar.
Then I started looking more closely at the translator, and editor, committees who are involved in the production of the modern bibles, and at the source materials. Catholic all the way. Why would Catholics help produce bibles written by and for- HERETICS?
I gained respect for the Heretical KJV Holy Bible. And I respect the bibles that have since been produced based on the "majority" text.
"the long ending of Mark". Here is some ammo for the lie that it's a questionable part of God's word.
If you add up the verse count of the book of Mark KJV you get 678 verses.
If you remove the "questionable verses" you get a verse count of 666.
Hmmm. Which is God's word and which is man's word?
@@HeisRisen174 You missed a few verses, and some entire lines. Word counting is dubious because a lot of bible "translators" toss in extra words. That way the text looks fuller, in spite of what was removed.
Some authors leave in the verse number so you can see that some text has been removed.
I've been around Ruckmanites quite a bit. They wrongly define inspiration using Job 32:8 as understanding. They can say the 1611 was re-inspired because God gave the translators special understanding.
When you misdefine words, you can pretty much say what you want.
The word study, in the KJV, doesn't mean what we think it means. I don't care. The way we have come to understand studying the Bible is what it means today. Some of the CT fans had a fit when I refused to fall inline. Why do I refuse to bend my knee to this weird interpretation? Because there are plenty of passages, in the NT that makes it clear that this is exactly what we are expected to do. Sit down and study the scriptures. Does the bible support someone's claims? If not, the discard that claim as false. Mark's "intelligible" words are sometimes blatantly false.
The problem with Mark Ward is that he didn't do his homework with the word study. The definition he went to actually goes back to the 12th century, but the meaning we have today is the same as in 1611. Reading the last part of the verse makes it clear.
Good breakdown. I appreciate it. And yes he is a snake.
I've enjoyed a lot of stuff here, but I don't understand calling Elijah Hixon and Mark Ward effeminate, instead of inaccurate here.
15:00-15:58
Mark Ward comes across very effeminate in his mannerisms and in his reasoning by appealing to emotion so often. If you can't discern this, that's on you.
@@TheCableStrain Not an explanation, just an assertion. Likewise on you for every word that's slanderously uttered against a brother. Using emotion in an argument isn't the same as effeminacy. This kind of comment is useless for actual conversations; it's almost Bulveristic, to riff on Lewis, to do this kind of move.
@@georgeluke6382 Ah yes, not surprising you'd reference someone like Lewis who denied the inerrancy of Scripture, and the nature of substitutionary penal atonement of Christ. Not surprising because of how you're defending someone like Ward, who in reality has a low view of Holy Scripture. Is Lewis a hero of yours? Good Sir, be more discerning! When you study Scripture do you accuse the Apostle Paul of ad hominem when he upbraids the Galatians because you have a notebook full of logical fallacy charts? I'm not the Apostle Paul (duh), I'm merely stating there are times to point out and strongly correct error; and effeminate behavior and faulty effeminate appeals to emotion is being in error, this isn't difficult to understand. Sir, if you claim you've "enjoyed a lot of stuff here" then be more discerning, nibble the meat and spit out the bone. No one is slandering anyone. I don't count Lewis or Ward as heroes of the faith. I count them as in error with a lean towards heretical. Good day sir, and God bless you.
[Edit:] Lewis was in my opinion just flat out heretical on numerous points. Whether he repented and was saved or not, God knows. I'd reference him less if I were you.
@@TheCableStrain I'm totally ok with Lewis being wrong on many points- I don't think he was wrong to put forward recapitulation or some kind of ransom that was going on; I would add he should've emphasized substitutionary atonement of the Calvinist stripe, but I also think many Calvinists should, of all Christians, have his "totus Christus" instincts in their practical theology. But, I'd also say you should recognize the distinctions between Judaizers explicitly denying the Gospel by promoting multiple tiers to Christian covenant membership beyond lawful boundaries as righteousness, and Christian men like Apollos who needed further instruction in what was and wasn't meant by certain terms in order to be more fully effective and less inaccurate.
Again, this is just Bulveristic- "my opponent likes Lewis, and shows a lack of discernment by association, so I can therefore explain his aversion to my calling brothers in the Lord self-apparently effeminate because of his lack of discernment elsewhere, therefore I need not argue with him."
For your criticism of Lewis, a dash more of his logic and avoiding thinking critiquing a man's associates (or allusions) means scoring a valid point in an argument, would do you good.
I pray and hope God convicts you for your careless and hateful attacks on fellow Christians. On an intellectual level, you need to be a bit more specific about your criticisms of Mark Wards position. What is your position on the KJV? Is it a preference but you have no intellectual reasons for being KJV only?
Hi James. You are commenting on a 40 minute video of specific criticisms. Care to be specific?
@@theyoungtextlessandreforme7113 After watching your video, you never got specific with your criticisms or problems with our Christian brother. Could that be the reason is audience is so much larger than your channel?
Mark Ward is a deceiver and a snake. I’ve watched a lot of his videos. Talks out of both sides of his mouth. With GOOD words and FAIR speeches he deceives. Scripture warns about his type. Too bad your too blinded to see it. I’ve dealt with his type before. It’s disgusting once you see through the facade.
@@jwatson181 Maybe Joel Osteen is the Way, Truth, and Life cuz he got the biggest channel! Yuk yuk!
@@Benjamin-bq7tc praying for you! Jesus is the way.
Did you just call Mark Ward " effeminate"?