วีดีโอ

The last 12 verses of Mark are omitted from only 2 MSS, codex Vaticanus and codex Sinaiticus. Every other extant MSS which contains the gospel of Mark has the Last 12 verses of Mark. Tatian's Diatessaron which was in wide circulation by 170 AD contains the last 12 verses of Mark. The evidence for the last 12 verses of Mark is ancient and vast. By my calculation, that is 255 years before codex Sinaiticus was truncated at Mark 16:8. The last 12 verses are in the Peshitta (the Syriac version of the New Testament in the Syriac dialect of Aramaic). “The Peshito is referred by common consent to the second century of our era and is found to contain the verses in question” John Burgon Dean of Oxford college 1881. No one ever questioned the authenticity of Mark 16:9-20 until Messieurs Westcott and Hort. What can we say about Westcott and Hort. Unregenerate atheistic Anglican Protestants. They were Tractarians, among other things. Tractarians were a group of faux protestants who were Jesuit infiltrators bent on returning the Church of England to Mother Rome through their tracts. See the Oxford Movement. They were sacerdotalists. Hort: “but you know I am a staunch sacerdotalist”. Sacerdotal: relating to or denoting a doctrine which ascribes sacrificial functions and spiritual or supernatural powers to ordained priests. They were Mary worshipers, Hort: “I have been persuaded for many years that Mary-worship and ‘Jesus’-worship have very much in common in their causes and their results.” Westcott: “After leaving the monastery we shaped our course to a little oratory…It is very small, with one kneeling-place; and behind a screen was a ‘Pieta’ the size of life (i.e. the Virgin and dead Christ)…I could not help thinking on the grandeur of the Roman Church, on her zeal even in error, on her earnestness and self-devotion, which we might, with nobler views and a purer end, strive to imitate. Had I been alone I could have knelt there for hours.” They were occultists. They founded the ‘Ghostly Guild’. Westcott, according to his son, would sit in his church auditorium all night communing with spirits. They were followers of founder of the Luciferian society madame Blavatsky who believed the “We are God (Monism). Both believed it possible to communicate with the dead and made many attempts to do just that. They thought that Darwin’s theory was “unanswerable”. There is so much to say about these ne’er-do-wells that space does not permit. I wouldn’t let either of these two bless my meal much less trust anything they said about the text of scripture.

The problem is not the KJV, the problem is that schools are churning out too many people that can’t read. It saddens me to see young people struggling to read something that should be easy. Our education system is a complete failure. Most homeschooled kids I know can read at a much higher level than anyone coming out of the public schools.

I appreciate your efforts here. Are you still active in your pursuits? I hope you are

Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?

If you love me, feed my sheep.

Man, what hoops they jump... apologists are really getting desperate. I thought the other videos were bad. People, stick to biblical scholars

I questioned Mark Ward on the number anomalies with astronomical odds that are only in the KJV.( ie 7 having an overwhelming significance of perfection and hidden throughout the text). These are not present in other versions anywhere near the extent as the kjv, He lied and told me the bible in the Urdu language has them. He later confessed that he doesn't know about Urdu and said he was "answering a fool according to his folly" Mark Ward is a lying snake, if your ministry is about sowing doubt in God's word and not about feeding people, clothing people, visiting the sick and the imprisoned, then your ministry is not of God.

I just listened to this video and though you use a theological primes to reason from you could reason from the earlier writings that look like quotes from most likely earlier at that time intact manuscripts. This is a logical claim to make and has been made by others regarding this issue.

lol. "Textual Critical Scholars are so disconnected with the church" These apologists just hate scholarship and also hate reality. It also theologically affects this dude. Also he does not understand TC as his video shows. He totally does not get it. Nothing new.

Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?

If you followed recensions, text-types, process, and now CBGM AKA GIGO, just wait until 2030 for the complete ECM. Then from an ancient garbage dump in Upper Egypt we find a new scrap. Methinks, I'll just stick with the AV. Peace.

Thank you!

I’m going to use this video to cure my insomnia. How do you justify that it’s not in any manuscript prior to 1522?

Way to expose mark ward for what he is , people who attack that word are in reality enemies of God, they are their own authority

Good work I’m glad to hear some young Christians have conviction encourage say the right thing but one thing that I think the most overlooked factor in this is that George Washington took his presidential out with his hand on the king James Bible, so changing the Bible is tantamount to treason because we don’t wanna give up our bill of rights in the constitution so if they can change the Bible, the constitution is garbage it’s political not just so-called religious

Reformed theology is NOT orthodox! Calvinism is an unBiblical damnable doctrine of demons! And the KJV only cultists who abosolutly refuse to acknowledge all the miss translations in the KJV, will be judged for their willful ignorance!

There's an exciting 1 John 5:7 debate at Standing For Truth @StandingForTruthMinistries April 20th, hope to see you there!

Great stuff , appreciate it brother . Any good books you would recommend in defense of the Received Text position ?

Ruckman did not believe the KJV was reinspired. He didn’t even believe the KJV was inspired he said it was “given by inspiration” just like it say. Essentially the original autographs are inspired and the KJV is an accurate translation of the preserved original text. He did give precedence to the kjv over the Greek in the sense of how the Greek is used by people to essential re interpret or twist passages and how people seek for “deeper understanding” from the Greek.

At least one early church father noticed this grammatical issue. Gregory of Nazanzius said the following in his Fifth theological oration: What about John then, when in his Catholic Epistle he says that there are Three that bear witness, the Spirit and the Water and the Blood? Do you think he is talking nonsense? ... Secondly, because he had not been consistent in the way he has happened upon his terms; for after using Three in the masculine gender he adds three words which are neuter, contrary to the definitions and laws which you and your grammarians have laid down. For what is the difference between putting a masculine Three first, and then adding One and One and One in the neuter, or after a masculine One and One and One to use the Three not in the masculine but in the neuter, which you yourself disclaim in the case of Deity? If the Comma Johannine were original, Gregory's argument would be meaningless. For his argument to be valid, Johannie Comma couldn't have been authentic.

I don't know man, I'd be super interested in the tools to do my own textual criticism. I can't believe the church hasn't yet put all the manuscripts in an easy to use/compare format yet.

For one of my undergraduate exercises in St Andrews University in 1965, and again in 1969, I gave a paper, on several NT Greek texts, before the Department of Greek and the Faculty of Divinity; and the reading, grammar and translation of the Comma were discussed in depth. The academics : 1. thought that the textual evidence favoured the omission of the words omitted by critical texts; 2. but that were inclined to agree that the omission did raise serious grammatical problems, and 3. saw the great strength in the argument that in verse 8 the definite article of the concluding words ("eis to hen" ) could not but point back and refer to the omitted words. This third point is ignored by friends and foe alike! See, for example, Bishop Middleton's treatment of the point in his book, "The Doctrine of the Greek Article" : see' for example, here, archive.org/details/doctrinegreekar00masogoog/page/440/mode/2up, at pages 440-453. (This is Rose's edition of 1833, which seems not to differ here from my copy of his 1855 "New Edition".)

Can you tell us more about Sam Reniham creating Greek grammar rules?

where did Ruckman ever say the kjv was re inspired? ruckman never even said the kjv was inspired he would always say it was "given by inspiration" just like the kjv says. he believed the autographs were inspired and the kjv preserved the text in the english language. I dont think anyone believes the kjv is directly inspired in the sense that the scholars sat down with a blank sheet and wrote down the word of God from their mind.

I’m pretty sure his video was scripted. I’m also pretty sure that all of his videos are scripted. He doesn’t mean any harm, he just wants to joke around.

Mark ward is a man that has no final authority except him self. He is deceiving people as an angel of light

Great video, brother!

Don't believe the critical texts, because they are from the erroneous Alexandrian of Egypt manuscripts which were done by anti Christians. Modern translations come from the erroneous Alexandrian of Egypt manuscripts, hence the errors in them.

Critical textualism is atheistic.

Mark Ward: the used car salesman of Bible scholars.

BJU Bible grads are the Jesuits of Evangelicalism/Neo-Fundamentalism. Nearly every word out of their mouths is an emotional, psychological manipulation. And YES, they are effeminate, and they attack their opponents the way a woman would., with guilt trips, gaslighting, feigned empathy.Your analysis was spot on. Guys like Mark Ward make my skin crawl. FOR REAL.

I really enjoyed this video. Thanks, brother!

I've been around Ruckmanites quite a bit. They wrongly define inspiration using Job 32:8 as understanding. They can say the 1611 was re-inspired because God gave the translators special understanding. When you misdefine words, you can pretty much say what you want.

Dankie

I'm kjv only but here's the problem with this line of reasoning. Greek may be a scholar's native language but it's his native language some 2000 years removed from the times of the original texts. I know educated theologians who can't understand the King James Bible 400 years after it was translated because the common tongue of today has evolved so much in 400 years. I can barely understand the trends of lingo of the generation behind me because it evolves so fast. People constantly make the argument of the original greek and Hebrew texts but the Jews don't even speak Hebrew. They speak Yiddish. The thing about the king James is that it's 99% coherent with all the world's historical translations. Gothic, Ethiopian, Aramaic, etc. It only disagrees with the vaticanus and all the modern interpretations are just that rather than translations. They are agenda driven based upon theologies rather than with intent to preserve the word of God. The problem is that God was 4 centuries ahead of man in English becoming the world's second language. The KJV is the Bible in English. Everything else is just pretending. People should strive to understand it and make their theology pass it's scrutiny rather than make it pass the scrutiny of their favorite theology.

The devil's bible.

I swear I thought I was the only one who thought he sounded very effeminate. What a blessing this video is. God bless you Taylor.

Amen!!!!

Just discovered your channel,AWESOME!!! AMEN!!!

Philippians 4:5 Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord is at hand. Ephesians 4:26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: Do our words fulfil these commands of God?

Very TRUE..... for if IT were, there would NOT now be 29 editions of the Nestle-Aland critical text book!! The fact that they have had to upgrade that book, now, 28 times and are working on the 29th. proves that the Critical Text N.T. that was created in 1881 by Westcott & Hort was and IS a wrong and corrupted N.T. text..... that makes all the bibles done, using their N.T. translation.... DONE from the false and corrupt Siniatinus and Vaticanus Codex's make all those bibles WRONG too!! Enough said......!!

I don’t think you need to be a professor of Greek linguistics, to figure this out.

Excellent work!

Crt is fact my friend. The African struggle for freedom against racism while contributing greatly to this country in the armed forces, technology, and civil rights, etc, is the most noble and dignified ever. Without Blacks, there is no America. No matter how hated we are and have been. Crt is real. All the nefarious plans against us have been confounded by God.

Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. Ever since modernising critical tinkering has developed lost hoards By their fruit you will know them Scripture tells of the falling away. Living in the world for the world as many in gatherings now do saddens us who watch you living without fear of Him who can say I not ever knew you go away. Does this ever bother you. strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

If you followed recensions, text-types, process, and now CBGN AKA GIGO, just wait until 2030 for the complete ECM. Then from an ancient garbage dump in Upper Egypt we find a new scrap. Methinks, I'll just stick with the AV. Peace.

The word study, in the KJV, doesn't mean what we think it means. I don't care. The way we have come to understand studying the Bible is what it means today. Some of the CT fans had a fit when I refused to fall inline. Why do I refuse to bend my knee to this weird interpretation? Because there are plenty of passages, in the NT that makes it clear that this is exactly what we are expected to do. Sit down and study the scriptures. Does the bible support someone's claims? If not, the discard that claim as false. Mark's "intelligible" words are sometimes blatantly false.

I listened a lot to Mark Ward, and I liked a lot of what he had to say. I also appreciated that if I posted a comment he would respond. But a problem developed. The ESV. I can still accept "translations" that include allegedly "errant" text, such as the "long ending of Mark." Many "translations" will retain the words, and verses while setting those versus apart, in some fashion. But at least it's still there. Among the allegedly "most accurate" bibles is the ESV. I noticed that it chops out verses, and words- just drops them out of existence, I have the 2016 Giant Print edition. When mentioning this to Mark, he got very defensive- basically calling me a liar. Then I started looking more closely at the translator, and editor, committees who are involved in the production of the modern bibles, and at the source materials. Catholic all the way. Why would Catholics help produce bibles written by and for- HERETICS? I gained respect for the Heretical KJV Holy Bible. And I respect the bibles that have since been produced based on the "majority" text.

lol I can't wait to see the gen z internet bibles of the future full of lingo like yeet. yea this existential philosopher and newly minted theologian is not impressed with modern textual criticism. these modern theologians working on new translations are myopic, lazy and of bad faith. I don't believe in inerrancy but I will be reading from the message before I find myself reading from the esv or any of the critical text translations why because I trust in god and good humans being able to enact logos something these translation certainly aren't doing.

I have a theory. In many colleges referring to the TR or the MT is forbidden. You can only study the CT. It has been my experience that many college professors are skeptical that the Bible seven real. The so called Critical Text studies are not about exploring anything more than how to discredit the Bible. Undermine the majority of texts, and leave the only texts that are extremely questionable, and you have nothing left.