The Crown Season 3 Episode 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 มี.ค. 2020
- Britain is facing economic crisis and needs America bail out or disaster happens. The American president isn't giving in because Britain PM did not support him over Vietnam. The British Prime Minister goes to the Queen with a proposal.
Season 3 Episode 1 right here • The Crown Season 3 Epi...
Mr. Krabs: I don't wanna give England any of my money!
I was amused the most by the fact that the actor who plays LBJ also does the voice of Mr. Krabs in SpongeBob
Is also the Captain of the Guards in Shawshank Redemption
The Krusty Krabb
And Kurgen from Highlander
Definitely an underrated actor. The most respected actors will always be those able to transition between live acting and voice acting so seemlessly.
And Clancy Brown is definitely underrated.The issue with being a big man with a big presence.Many moons ago a friend who didn't understand why I liked him,said he looks like he eats small children for breakfast.It's unfortunate that people can't look beyond the exterior
I would watch an entire show about LBJ, being played by Clancy Brown
Watch "All the way"
@@3of11 Bryan Cranston was brilliant in that!
NGL, while the biopics were great, Clancy Brown is the only one who had that body language.
"PRESIDENT?! Do you know how much power I'd have to GIVE UP to be president?"
I think LBJ hit the nail on the head when he said, "the Brits look down on everyone and yet they have both hands out for money"!! He was a good judge of character and a smart guy as well 😉😉.
Speaking as an American, that scene starting at 0:50 was a ridiculously accurate portrayal of LBJ. Crass, loud, arrogant, a bully who was used to getting his way. That said, he was an incredibly intelligent man and remarkably talented legislator who helped pass some of the most important and meaningful laws in American history. Were it not for the Vietnam War, he'd probably be remembered as one of America's greatest Presidents.
Probably
@@rob161993 He is remembered for three achievements: Civil Rights, Great Society, and Vietnam. He had an ambitious agenda and had the political moxie to do it all, and that was within one term. He consumed himself in Vietnam, though, and in doing so destroyed his legacy. If he managed to avoid the war, he'd certainly be much better commemorated than JFK.
@@rob161993 maybe you might disagree with @Christopher G but it is a documented fact that he was tall and used to shove his face towards others in front of him....... just as shown in the video
@@acommentor6413 It was even called the Johnson treatment I think?
@@inspirationrelaxation6189 yeah something like that
0:54 Spongebob I’m not letting England take all me Money
That Man has most vulgus Texan like accents I have ever seen I like him
LBJ was sore at Harold Wilson for not sending troops to Vietnam (one was Wilson's best judgements)
While that may have been a good choice, what did Wilson honestly expect from LBJ, asking for help and rolling out the old “Special Relationship” routine when he had denied the US help previously? Plus he had to have known that LBJ was the type of guy who’d hold a grudge over something like that.
Prime Minister Harold Holt sent 1000 troops to Vietnam and was never heard or seen again after skin diving. That should say something.
@@spacemarinechaplain9367 Perhaps the fact we were fighting our own wars, at the time, not to mention the fact Britain had fought in Vietnam already way before any Americans would arrive. In 1946 Britain sent troops, and we were in no position to commit to America's demand and start another conflict across the globe, whilst our empire crumbled and we downsized. Meanwhile America was in the height of its golden age, the Britain and US were polar opposites, and had traded circumstances (America becoming the worlds powerhouse, whilst the sun set of Britain's empire). LBJ was many things, including a great president, but the idea we "denied" help is preposterous and inaccurate. We simply could not comply with the demands.
@@triciajohansen3027 LOL
@@spacemarinechaplain9367 *What are you talking about?*
a) Wilson sent 1000 British Indians to Vietnam. More than LBJs own county sent.
b) Britain fought the Vietnam war between 1945 and 1946 (with the Americans no where to be seen)... and that was at the same time Britain was fighting against the Germans between 1939 and 1946.
LBJ be like : Harold me boy, you will not get me money. Ack Ack Ack Ack
They couldnt have found an actor with a more American accent
There is no American accent, everyone sounds different wherever you go. LBJ had a southern drawl.
It’s a southern accent. What the hell is an American accent? Noo Yawk? LA? No such thing.
@@niobe460America may not have a specific accent, but you have to admit that when foreigners think of America THIS is the accent they think of
0:51 Harold me boy! You wasting all me money!
Me money! Harold has me money!
Arg arg arg arg arg!!!
This is why Lex Luthor being president was always such a nightmare.
Yes, Johnson really was like that.
It’s sad because this was just another indication of the UK’s declining influence and importance on the world stage. After the Sues crisis, the UK was on the decline increasingly dependent on the US in terms of financial backing and international support. A far cry from an empire that stretched across the world and had a colony on every continent.
“Every story has its end no matter how long it takes”
This imply to us as well
Thank you Mrs. T for putting a stop to that.
@@gruweldaad
Well....not really. If anything, Britain under thatcher was increasingly dependent on the US in regards to foreign policy and thatcher did nothing when Reagan was implementing often covert means of destabilizing Caribbean and Latin American governments in an effort to displace communism even when those nations were protectorates or colonies of the UK.
And look at the UK now, a shell of its former empire. Former colonies opting out of the commonwealth and its influence diminishing, at least France has made some leeway in regards to global premiership following the same damage from the suez crisis.
But thatcher did little to stop the inevitable, if anything she merely destabilized British infrastructure via privatization. But that’s up for debate.
@@henrylivingstone2971 Was it possible for Britain to be any more dependent on the United States for defense in 1979 than it already was? At the very least, she didn't come begging the US to eject the Argentinians from the Falklands. They did that on their own. I still fail to see how the British economy was "destabilized" by privatizing the railways. That was obviously a mistake. The substantial increase in foreign investment, and the reduction of public expenditure into failing industries all made the UK economy more powerful in the long run.
@@gruweldaad
Yes, it was possible for the UK to be more dependent on the US in regards to foreign policy as it came to fruition when in March of 2003 when the UK joined the US in the invasion of Iraq.
The reason thatcher didn’t come to the US for military assistance in the Falklands wasn’t because of national pride or capability, it’s because the US never would’ve agreed to do so. Why would the US allocate funds and resources to assist the UK in trying to consolidate its overseas territory? Turning to the US for assistance was never a viable option.
When did I say that the British economy was destabilized? I never said that, you made that up for some bizarre reason. I said that the British infrastructure was destabilized as in transport, utilities, energy and nationally held production industries. By privatizing this infrastructure like you’ve said it allows for foreign control, lack of quality, rising prices and an overall disadvantage for the people.
You may think that the UK economy might be strong but it’s only been 35 years since the implementation hardly long term by any economic model. Especially when national autonomy is at the influence of foreign interests. Chinese and middle eastern investment bodies control much of the UK’s infrastructure, how safe do you feel knowing your government is at the beck and call of foreign interests.
The three wise men lol
That isn't the biblical wise men. It's 3 senior figures at the heart of the government.
I knew
@@mscott3918 Not the government, but the palace.
@@mscott3918 Oh wow, really? She wasn't going to consult with 3 ancient Jews in the Middle East?
@@thesaint8400 I appreciate your sarcasm, but the wise men weren't Jews.
Only a Brit would think they're America's oldest ally
the johnson treatment lol
This is one of the most accurate portrayals of Lyndon Johnson. Other actors such as Michael Gambon and Tom Wilkinson, two of the greatest actors in British Television and cinema, as well as internationally in films, got the mannerisms and the idea right, but weren’t the most convincing. I didn’t care much for James Cromwell’s or John Carroll Lynch’s portrayal of Johnson in the 2002’s TV movie RFK and the 2017 movie, Jackie; Despite the fact that their also lovely actors with a lot of talent. Even Woody Harrelson, whose one of my favorite actors and people, and who’s actually from Texas just like President Johnson, his portrayal of LBJ wasn’t the best, he was very naturally Texan in his accent and mannerism, he got the crass and crudeness right, but the tone of voice and the flow of the voice was very different to the uniqueness of LBJ’s, and he was much too short. Around 5’8-5’9 to Lyndon Johnson’s 6’4 height.
I haven't seen All The Way yet, but Bryan Cranston looks so much like Johnson it's almost scary.
Oh shoot, I forgot Bryan Cranston’s portrayal is another convincing one, much shorter than LBJ’s 6’4, 200 and something frame, but the acting, no doubt masterful. Bryan Cranston is phenomenal especially in biopics, he was really great as Dalton Trumbo as well.
I always thought woody is from Indiana. Maybe cheers
@@sterlingsemuda5229 Nope, A Texas Boy…Very Texan indeed.
Lol 😆 🤣 😂 Johnson sounds like he was a fun man.
Technically, France has been America’s oldest ally, not Britain.
That's right!
Most reliable ally*
That's what I thought too. Technically Britain is America's first and oldest.... enemy.
As a country perhaps, but not in terms of governments: the U.S. alliance with Britain was and is with its current monarchy and parliamentary system. France, on the other hand, has changed systems of government I think eleven times since its first alliance with King Louis. President Washington was careful to note that America's alliance with France terminated along with Louis XVI's life.
Kingdom of France, not the French Republic
Lex Luthor: "PRESIDENT? Do you how much power I'd have to GIVE UP to be president?"
0:50 superman associates with the brits, I cannot work with them and that alien
😂😂😂😂LbJ my favorite new line. 😂😂😂😂😂
He’s a Texan😀
All I can hear is Lex Luthor
Elizabeth was smart to send her sister Princess Margaret to LBJ and she keelhauled him...and got the bailout. LBJ then talked about the special relationship between the US and England! All they had to do was send a pretty girl like Margaret to LBJ and she worked wonders. He DID like brunettes. Everybody remembers that party, which went on until well into the morning.
It's a lie. Margaret didn't do anything.
@@nomahope3182 no it's not. Some of us were around and remember. They STILL talk about that party today and how effective Margaret was. LBJ was the toughest of all our Presidents, and she wowed him....,and got the bailout
Mr.krabs giving the johnson treatment lol
Ahoy no money for you, Harold me boy!
That was definitely Johnson….rude and crude with a big mouth.
Johnson could be crude but I think the animosity here was exagerrated
I've actually heard that they downplayed it in the show. A shame. It would've been damn entertaining.
I take it you've never read stories about when LBJ can get truly angry at someone. There's a little thing that he used to do called the treatment and it's classic.
Nah lol. Pretty accurate “Johnsoning”
Flower? And chocolat, I presum?
People commenting on here like this was a documentary. There was no bailout issue. The US had loaned the UK money and they simply suspended payments during parts of the 1960's. It didn't even make headlines here. LBJ could sometimes be brash, but not the cartoonish person they portrayed on the show. In fact, he was a notably compassionate coalition builder with a tremendous work ethic. Margaret was never sent to meet with him to help with any bailout. The Queen never invited LBJ, nor did he ever reject an invitation. Margaret went for a social visit and it was a very dignified affair. I know "The Crown" is fiction, but man did they murder this entire storyline. The problem wasn't truth vs. fiction. The problem was the writers couldn't figure out what to do with Margaret's character, so they created a storyline that was way off the charts.
เอกสารลายมือใครซูม(360องศา)
Who were these "three wise men"?
เทคโนส่วนบุคคลสถานที่ส่วนตัว
1:04 Did anybody snort in this part of this scene? Or was it just me?
Maybe it's just you
really givin em the ole johnson treatment
Vietnam was such a success. 😳😬😂
It's funny to see that American-British relationship is not always good.
and the other hand, It felt funny that the United States did not help the Brits at Suez-crisis. and the Brits did not lend a hand at Vietnam war.
To be honest. to me, Gulf of Tonkin incident, and the start of the Suez-crisis is..... awfully way to similar
Who is this PM?
Harold Wilson, labour; got elected after douglas holme resigned (douglas holme himself got the office after macmillan resigned)
#∆คิดๆ
It must have gotten annoying for people who had multiple audiences with the Queen to have to deal with her while she sits in that chair like that
Haha that’s just the way she was always schooled to sit, act, and generally behave around people, with modesty and restraint. I imagine it might be perceived differently by the many people who used to visit her.
Never liked LBJ, but have to say I agree with his statement 100% and his delivery thereof.
You agree 100% that the UK should have followed America into that ridiculous, bloody, embarrassing quagmire called Vietnam?
Yes, lets talk about ridiculous bloody embarrassing quagmires----Maybe look into the atrocities caused by the UK, and this is just the UK. Famine in India, Ventersburg, Boer concentration camps, Armritsar Massacre, just to name only a few. The UK has a history of begging for money or military backup from the US. That ridiculous broke aristocracy begging for money from American families in exchange for some laughable useless title, Churchill begging the US for help when Germany was about to decimate your country. Honestly, I don't know why we bother with the UK, we don't need your minuscule military.@@thisisryan2094
What a clever idea.
Betray England.
Lex Luthor.
Isnt america's oldest ally France ?
'The Crown' should reflect reality. Monarchy shouldn't be used as real-life soap opera, nor just as material to fill space in the media. Elizabeth II's death has seen much publicity, not much thought about why she matters, and why the UK has a monarchy.
The achievement of the British monarchy should become clear in comparison with the histories of other countries. In the 19th & 20th centuries the U.S.A, France, Germany, Russia, Italy, Spain and Greece suffered in various ways civil wars, political storms, and dictatorships. This shows what can go wrong in the absence of a head of state which is above politics, and which opposes illegal dictatorship. If there are many reasons England, Wales, and Scotland have had no civil war since Culloden in 1746, having a constitutional monarchy to unify all the people is an important reason. In the UK, 'peace' in formal speech is "The King's Peace".
Of course King Charles III's first marriage was a tragic mistake; Prince Philip could be tactless; he & Elizabeth II made mistakes as parents. Whatever mistakes the royal family have made, let us be grateful for the unity the monarchy gives the UK & the world. By stabilizing Britain & the commonwealth (e.g. Canada & Australia), it promotes peace in the world. The sea around it didn't protect the U.S.A. against civil war in the 1860s, and the UK could have suffered civil war over slavery in the 19th century; likewise over world war, loss of empire, economic failure, or race in the 20th. There will always be violence and political problems in the world, and billions of people who know or understand nothing of the British monarchy and the stability it brings. Since the 1700s, billions of people have lived under the British crown without civil war, lynching, dictatorship in their lives. God save King Charles III, and his successors.
Didn't you write something incredibly similar on the Aberfan video?
Who were „the three wise man“?
her private secretaries
Michael Adeane (Private secretary to the Sovereign), Martin Charteris (Assistant Private Secretary) and Philip Moore (who will succeed Charteris).
Shows LBJ as real pos which he probably was
"You can't screw a man in the A*s and then expect him to buy you Flowers" So True!
The secretary's Texan accent is almost campy with how extra it is. The LBJ scene is very much "acting," but it doesn't flow right.
I don't know if you're from Texas or not but believe it or not I've actually heard people that talk like that guy does.
@@navblue20 Born, raised, still kicking it in Texas, doll. Yes, people talk like this, but in the context of this show it strikes me as flamboyant and even corny. They got LBJ's attitude right, but the cadence is off.
The Crown has a reputation of casting the British characters with precision and American characters so imprecisely one cannot be blamed for thinking it is done deliberately.
I'm looking forward to their portrayal of Nixon by Bobcat Goldthwait.
ซูมตั้งแต่พระราชินีนาถอิลิซาเบธที่สองเป็นสาวที่พระราชวังปักกิ้งแฮม
คุณยังญาติดีกับมัน
ป่วนได้ใจus_zoom
“If they’re not looking down at you through their noses they’ve got their hands out like beggars.” Same can be said for all our NATO Allies
At times, maybe... but US aircraft industry has done extremely well out of NATO over the years... F-80,F-84,F-86,F-100,F-104,F-4,F-5,F-6,A-7,F-16,F-18. Not to mention all the training, weapons and support equipment. Then you have the C-130, C-135, KC-135, E-2, E-3. NATO countries now buying the F-35 in pretty big numbers. Britain alone has a $1.1bn dollar deal for the F-35 alone! Then there was the Hawk Sam's the West Germans bought. Add to that artillery; M105, M110, MRLS plus more... not a bad shopping list over the years is it?
They got LBJ talking way too fast... although the content is pretty dead on.
I hate it that they changed the character to be a new Elizabeth J want the old one
Avia - this was the mid1960s - the Queen was in her 40s by this point so making her older is realistic
@@WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 yeah I know I got used to it since Princess Diana came into the movie
角川春樹さん
テレビで子ども産んで、たくさんですか?
新津恵子に、対して、何ですか?
伊東智美ＭI6とCIA
Johnson was a poor President, power hungry, ill mannered human. I think some of the conflicts that happened during his Presidency was his own doing to make him feel important. We could have lost allies because of him.
If it would not for Lyndon Johnson we would never have gotten the civil rights of the voting Rights Act Bill through. Kennedy didn't have the cash check to do that nor did he had the guts to take on the southern block of senators.
What undid Johnson was Vietnam and that yes is on him. But the man knew exactly how to get the job done except for Vietnam.
@@navblue20 These are interesting untill I remember that I'm both Canadian and ignorant, so I have no context for anything that you're saying
@@navblue20 that’s not true. JFK would’ve passed the CRA. This is just a popular myth
@@thehammurabichode7994 He passed the Civil Rights Act that gave all minorities equal rights to white people under law.
角川春樹さん
日本大学林真理子先生
國學院大学
慶應義塾大学見城徹さん
何ですか?
伊東智美ＭI6とCIA
Was LBJ really this spoiled?
not really. There is some element of LBJ in reality that was conveyed here, but everything was way over exaggerated
America NEVER had a spoiled President…..until Biden 🤷🏼♀️