This is a pretty good list considering how hard Almighties is to rank, although I’m not a fan of how vague and somewhat contradictory the methodology is, especially when you mention Kuu/ Akira for Zeus and Warlock/ Bora for Aphrodite despite specifically saying units outside of the set won’t affect the ranking. Pretty suspicious why you would choose to mention those ubers in the video.
@@TheGamingDuck-hl5qp I think you’re sort of missing my point. I say it’s suspicious that you mentioned those ubers because this ranking makes the most sense when you look at it in the perspective of “if I had every uber in the game, how would I rank” which isn’t reflected at all in your methodology, and it makes sense. Tem and Kieko were very clear influences to the ranking and their methodology resembles what I just described, to an extreme level. I’ve said this before, but you would really benefit by creating your own methodology.
@@XskullDrSkull I rly wanna know what placements in particular makes u think this was looked at from a “if I had every Uber in the game, how would I rank” perspective, I’d be happy to help explain why they’ve been placed where they are. And no, I did not have an influence on this ranking, I’m almost positive that duck was set on his placements before I even met him, I never tried to change his mind other than saying lucifer should be lower than gaia and saying Poseidon should be first (jokingly), and as you can see, neither of these changes were made.
@@XskullDrSkull as far as i've known duck which is before kieko and tem, he's always been pretty clear about his rankings and they haven't changed pretty much at all. Also, he never lets his rankings get influenced in a way sort of stubborn (not a ba thing, there is a difference between that and taking an opinion into consideration). And besides, his point abouts aphro and zeus aren't wrong. Even if bora, warlock, kuu, akira didn't exist, it would still be true that aphro's damage is underwhelming and that zeus' ultra talents are waste of resources. He's just saying that to emphasise those points, but it doesn't necessarily affect the ranking.
Getting the elephant out of the room, Aphrodite being placed so low very clearly exposes the nature of this ranking. Aphrodite is an all round solid sniper in terms of generalist and can be used alongside other attackers for additional chip while still maintaining an incredibly strong alien niche that lets her remain relevant in later game areas as a specialist. Aphrodite only starts looking faulty when you directly compare her to other snipers such as Daliasan, Saki, and Phono. In a methodology that involves owning every uber, it would make sense to rank Aphrodite low as there does exist a multitude of ubers that outclass Aphro either as a generalist or a specialist. Unfortunately, Duck’s methodology says no. Competition outside of the set does not affect ranking, so Aphrodite has a clear field to rank in at the bare minimum of the middle of the set. In terms of competition inside the set which the methodology does emphasize, Aphro’s low placement still makes little sense. Even though Ganesha and arguably Lucifer are better snipers than Aphro, it still shouldn’t impact Aphro’s placement that much unless the methodology assumes you have all almighties, and now we’re back at square one. Aphrodite isn’t the only one who contradicts Duck's methodology. Amaterasu and Ganesha’s unusually lower placements also make more sense looking in an every uber methodology. In an every uber methodology, someone like Amaterasu will rank lower due to her being a fairly generic backliner (albeit still carrying one of the highest general DPS) and owning all other specialist backliners will de-value Amaterasu due to the nature of how specialists thrive in later game meta. Amaterasu also faces competition from Gao and Sirius, meaning that what Amaterasu can offer is also found in other ubers. Similar story can be told with Ganesha. While he is one of the strongest stat based LD attackers amongst ubers, other stronger ubers (specifically top ubers such as Kaslis and Phonos) out compete Ganesha with their higher stats or more fleshed out ability set. Similarly to Amaterasu, you can also find what Ganesha has to offer through other ubers. This is why Hades and Poseidon are so high. These ubers have properties that can’t be found easily in other ubers, and thus they earn a high ranking due to their uniqueness which gives them more value. But remember, Duck’s methodology doesn’t account for the existence of other ubers outside of the set, so the uniqueness argument for Hades and Poseidon starts to crumble. The last thing I want to mention is the vagueness of Duck’s methodology. “Ranked based off of how they compare to each other” like no shit? That’s the literal goal of a ranking. Methodology is supposed to be a guide for how you compare ubers to each other. I want to emphasize that an every uber methodology isn’t a bad way to rank, rather the methodology was just very poorly communicated and ended up being contradictory towards what the actual ranking is. By no means am I saying the ranking itself is bad. A ranking is good or bad based on how consistently you follow your methodology, not whether X unit is higher than Y unit. TL:DR: The ranking is fine, but the methodology was poorly executed.
what I think every almighty is: zooz : C.Bahamut but better Anubis : A failed rusher Aphro : Nerd cat but with a shit ton of damage towards aliens Gaia : Dont have Lucifer : Dont have Ganesha : Big knuckle go boom Hades : Good Hp and Decent amount of damage Amaratsu : Amazing against traitless but bad generalist usage Poseiden : Yukimura but with longer range and savage blow and freeze Chronos : Mitama but freeze
to all the aphro simps out there saying she’s the best almighty (🤓) , no one gives a shit abt aliens anymore, we have much better stuff like he mentioned, aliens are easy af now
An Uber can fall off in the meta when their role isn’t as valued anymore. For example, Aphrodite. Yeah, Aphrodite used to be good back then, not anymore. This is because the enemies are boosted heavily and her little dmg isn’t enough anymore. Her high range isn’t good anymore as things like surge can reach her and not to mention enemies are a load more aggressive so snipers just fall off later in the game. You can’t use her alongside other attackers since her dmg is so little, might as well just use an actual attacker.
Imo at level 60 it goes: Chronos Ganesha Amaterasu Poseidon (savage blow talent) Lucifer Anubis (with ultra talents) Gaia Aphrodite Hades (way too high on your list) Aset Zeus (even with ultra talents)
@@teslapanda1412just saying, but this is by far the best banner (apart fest exclusives) to roll from. Even Zeus is good compared to other Ubers (not really) and you have a pretty good chance of getting something good, as literally any one of these carries early game
This is a pretty good list considering how hard Almighties is to rank, although I’m not a fan of how vague and somewhat contradictory the methodology is, especially when you mention Kuu/ Akira for Zeus and Warlock/ Bora for Aphrodite despite specifically saying units outside of the set won’t affect the ranking. Pretty suspicious why you would choose to mention those ubers in the video.
Those are just side notes that I felt to talk about as I said even when I brought them up they don't effect the ranking itself
@@TheGamingDuck-hl5qp I think you’re sort of missing my point. I say it’s suspicious that you mentioned those ubers because this ranking makes the most sense when you look at it in the perspective of “if I had every uber in the game, how would I rank” which isn’t reflected at all in your methodology, and it makes sense. Tem and Kieko were very clear influences to the ranking and their methodology resembles what I just described, to an extreme level.
I’ve said this before, but you would really benefit by creating your own methodology.
@@XskullDrSkull I rly wanna know what placements in particular makes u think this was looked at from a “if I had every Uber in the game, how would I rank” perspective, I’d be happy to help explain why they’ve been placed where they are. And no, I did not have an influence on this ranking, I’m almost positive that duck was set on his placements before I even met him, I never tried to change his mind other than saying lucifer should be lower than gaia and saying Poseidon should be first (jokingly), and as you can see, neither of these changes were made.
@@XskullDrSkull as far as i've known duck which is before kieko and tem, he's always been pretty clear about his rankings and they haven't changed pretty much at all. Also, he never lets his rankings get influenced in a way sort of stubborn (not a ba thing, there is a difference between that and taking an opinion into consideration).
And besides, his point abouts aphro and zeus aren't wrong. Even if bora, warlock, kuu, akira didn't exist, it would still be true that aphro's damage is underwhelming and that zeus' ultra talents are waste of resources. He's just saying that to emphasise those points, but it doesn't necessarily affect the ranking.
Getting the elephant out of the room, Aphrodite being placed so low very clearly exposes the nature of this ranking. Aphrodite is an all round solid sniper in terms of generalist and can be used alongside other attackers for additional chip while still maintaining an incredibly strong alien niche that lets her remain relevant in later game areas as a specialist.
Aphrodite only starts looking faulty when you directly compare her to other snipers such as Daliasan, Saki, and Phono. In a methodology that involves owning every uber, it would make sense to rank Aphrodite low as there does exist a multitude of ubers that outclass Aphro either as a generalist or a specialist.
Unfortunately, Duck’s methodology says no. Competition outside of the set does not affect ranking, so Aphrodite has a clear field to rank in at the bare minimum of the middle of the set.
In terms of competition inside the set which the methodology does emphasize, Aphro’s low placement still makes little sense. Even though Ganesha and arguably Lucifer are better snipers than Aphro, it still shouldn’t impact Aphro’s placement that much unless the methodology assumes you have all almighties, and now we’re back at square one.
Aphrodite isn’t the only one who contradicts Duck's methodology. Amaterasu and Ganesha’s unusually lower placements also make more sense looking in an every uber methodology.
In an every uber methodology, someone like Amaterasu will rank lower due to her being a fairly generic backliner (albeit still carrying one of the highest general DPS) and owning all other specialist backliners will de-value Amaterasu due to the nature of how specialists thrive in later game meta. Amaterasu also faces competition from Gao and Sirius, meaning that what Amaterasu can offer is also found in other ubers.
Similar story can be told with Ganesha. While he is one of the strongest stat based LD attackers amongst ubers, other stronger ubers (specifically top ubers such as Kaslis and Phonos) out compete Ganesha with their higher stats or more fleshed out ability set. Similarly to Amaterasu, you can also find what Ganesha has to offer through other ubers.
This is why Hades and Poseidon are so high. These ubers have properties that can’t be found easily in other ubers, and thus they earn a high ranking due to their uniqueness which gives them more value.
But remember, Duck’s methodology doesn’t account for the existence of other ubers outside of the set, so the uniqueness argument for Hades and Poseidon starts to crumble.
The last thing I want to mention is the vagueness of Duck’s methodology. “Ranked based off of how they compare to each other” like no shit? That’s the literal goal of a ranking. Methodology is supposed to be a guide for how you compare ubers to each other.
I want to emphasize that an every uber methodology isn’t a bad way to rank, rather the methodology was just very poorly communicated and ended up being contradictory towards what the actual ranking is.
By no means am I saying the ranking itself is bad. A ranking is good or bad based on how consistently you follow your methodology, not whether X unit is higher than Y unit.
TL:DR: The ranking is fine, but the methodology was poorly executed.
What is this aspect ratio bro 😭😭😭
I’d personally put Aphrodite higher and Hades lower but fair enough
Ayo aphro at 8 really can't imagine how worst she getting 😮😮
Hades over lucifer and ganesha pains me
And ameterasu at number 3
What is wrong with ameterasu at 3
I think she's better then chronos but I've changed my opinions since then and fully agree with the placement
@@Supaluka_77 ohh you mean she deserve higher on the list? I thought you meant lower
@@teslapanda1412 yeah but I don't mind the placement anymore
So your saying that Poseidon is first😮
nahhhh did someone just put aphro very low💀
Ain’t u the guy who thinks aphro is a top 15 Uber 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
@@Kieko7 top 5
@@Jabnyb u are delusional
@@Jabnyb i agree with u. ama and aphro are both top 7ish ubers. only beaten by the fests obv like dasli and mitama
@@eric4334 Ama yes, Aphro, Hell no
what I think every almighty is:
zooz : C.Bahamut but better
Anubis : A failed rusher
Aphro : Nerd cat but with a shit ton of damage towards aliens
Gaia : Dont have
Lucifer : Dont have
Ganesha : Big knuckle go boom
Hades : Good Hp and Decent amount of damage
Amaratsu : Amazing against traitless but bad generalist usage
Poseiden : Yukimura but with longer range and savage blow and freeze
Chronos : Mitama but freeze
Now that anubis has his ultra talents , I guess he is a need to protect or else its game over (or a cat who can rush and take more space ).
WTF U MEAN AMATERASU HAS NASSIVE DMG AGAINST TRAITED NOT TRAITLESS
OH HELL NAH HE RANKED ANUBIS HIGHER THAN ZEUS IM GONNA CRY FOR DECADES 😭😭😭 /j
Not anymore my child. Ponos decided to take anubis out of the trash and put him on display.
@@Dado_nastrohe is probably best late game generalist now
@@Beelzebub_husbandDasli, Balrog, D/Phono, Poseidon, etc, etc.
Not to mention he put Aphrodite at 8💀
What a sad first video.
how is all these bad ubers better then aphrodite?
Because this ranking is absolutely terrible
I think because her talent are bad
Ningún de los que superan a afrodita es malo, además los otros son generalistas en su mayoría,no como afrodita que se limita a los alien.
Oh, I take it back, I just got Poseidon and Chronos from the same Uberfest 11 draw😂😂😂
Is rare to get two almighties in the first chapter with the 11 things?🗿
Is it rare to get balrog and momoco from a roll in the first chap
Is it rare to get dark iz and izanagi in the first chapter of eoc right after Japan using the ticket and 150 from cat scratcher?
I got 4 lmao
3:39 she’s a what😀
Lolipop
Wtf, why aphrodite in 8??
And amaterasu?
to all the aphro simps out there saying she’s the best almighty (🤓) , no one gives a shit abt aliens anymore, we have much better stuff like he mentioned, aliens are easy af now
Literalmente con dr.klay, bora y volta, prefiero asta a anubis.
Aphro Amatusa Gaia and Hadez are top tier gods
Can someone explain how an Uber can fall off in the meta
It doesn't this tier list is just dog shit and Aphrodite is still the goat
An Uber can fall off in the meta when their role isn’t as valued anymore. For example, Aphrodite. Yeah, Aphrodite used to be good back then, not anymore. This is because the enemies are boosted heavily and her little dmg isn’t enough anymore. Her high range isn’t good anymore as things like surge can reach her and not to mention enemies are a load more aggressive so snipers just fall off later in the game. You can’t use her alongside other attackers since her dmg is so little, might as well just use an actual attacker.
@@TerraRetro thanks
Imo at level 60 it goes:
Chronos
Ganesha
Amaterasu
Poseidon (savage blow talent)
Lucifer
Anubis (with ultra talents)
Gaia
Aphrodite
Hades (way too high on your list)
Aset
Zeus (even with ultra talents)
Bro Hades is super good even tho I dont use him alot
switch hades and aphrodite and this is better
1 should be amaterasu
Chronos top is insane btw
chronos is so good
What do you mean? CHRONOS IS AMAZINGGGGGG
@@YacanthandleitPoseidon’s higher imo
Amaterasu is not worse than poseiden lol
Bro is living in the past. Ama fell off the board. Poseidon is much better in every way
Not to mention Chronos😏
Im a beginner but i feel like gaia is better than amaterasu cos amaterasu range isnt good when i use her
Amaterasu has a standing range of 455 vs Gaia's 400
CHRONOS THE GOAT 🔥🔥🔥
First seconds of video and I know this would be good video
i pulled from this banner, got zeus and anubis.
I use my first ticket to the new account
Almighty Theamar D Lux
I use my second ticket in my new account
Ganesha
I use my 25th ticket in my new account
Chrono
Amaterasu > Hades > Ganesha is a very interesting take...not saying i'm against it, but it's definitely interesting to think about
this ranking is REALLY good. as of now i dont think i’d change any placements
1:58 if his surge actually spawned between 200-250 his surge may actually be more helpful to his dps.
I pretty much entirely agree with this list. Only one I'd switch is put Amaterasu lower down, but I can understand 3
Amaterasu is that bad?
@@teslapanda1412 she isnt bad i just dislike her personally.
@@TheBedLump_Sans oh ok
@@teslapanda1412just saying, but this is by far the best banner (apart fest exclusives) to roll from. Even Zeus is good compared to other Ubers (not really) and you have a pretty good chance of getting something good, as literally any one of these carries early game