I own many Red Wing Heritage boots (old guy), and I don’t need a Classic Chelsea to imitate an Iron Ranger. Just like I don’t need my Traction-Tread Iron Rangers to replicate my other Iron Rangers. Variation and experimentation requires a desire to succeed and willingness to fail. Good on Red Wing to try. The “chattering-class” might have to catch up. And my Black Harness Classic Chelsea boots are a groovy option that I plan to wear tonight as we go see The Eagles in concert. Thanks for your thoughts and reviews, always worth a watch and listen.
I have these in Ebony Harness and they’re probably my most comfortable pair in my collection. Great for going out and taking my dog for his walk in the morning. Not traditional but as long as they keep making the more heritage styles, these are a welcome style. Blundstone killers for sure.
Not so fast with the "Blundstone killers" I've literally climbed mountains in my Blundstones. Judging by the sole and tread of these boots, they're not proper hikers.
I have 7 Red Wing Heritage boots currently, including these Chelseas. I’ve owned Blundstones. These will last for a decade or more and can be resolved. Blundstones are a year of wear, maybe two if you are lucky, and still made in MN. Some of the materials in the insole have been changed/added for comfort, but there is no drop in quality. The addition of the traction Tred Iron Ranger is a new model, not a replacement. It’s a little hyperbolic to suggest that suddenly they are trying to pull a fast one on buyers: it’s a high quality alternative for those who want additional comfort and no break in, and only for a little more than the mass market Blundstones.
I really like that they put the leather on top of the foam instead of the opposite! Much nicer for comfort/climate. It looks like a good compromise for fast comfort.
I’d love to see a comparison between the Redwing Chelseas and Blundstones. A lot of folks throw shade on Bludstones because of their constructions. But they are very comfortable. I’m with you, I find myself wearing my one pair of Blundstones more than the multiple pairs of Red Wings I own.
Longterm and support-wise the redwings will be better. The blundstones will be more comfortable in short walks, etc. But the blundstones rely heavily on an insole for support, which insoles wear out often.
Different boots for different uses. If you need a hard working hard wear boot you get the traditional ones that are purpose built. These new Chelsea boots seem more for "dressing up" or doing work on your feet all day where maybe you're in a factory or on pavement and not in dirt or mud. Built more for comfort than hard use while still being durable and repairable.
I agree. This style of boots will never have the same durability as regular full leather boots. The stretchy synthetic part will wear out and then you throw the chelsea boots away. So why not focus on comfort instead.
I picked up a pair on sale last year. Get a lot of compliments on these. One or two wearings and they’re broken in, compared to my Beckman’s that took a week or more. I think I’ve maintained them once and they still look good. Great casual boots
I bought a pair of these in ebony harness when they were first released and they are far and away the most comfortable pair of boots I have ever owned. I wear these daily and they are still holding up great.
I’ve had this boot now for about 3 years and I love them. They are my all purpose boot. I still wear my iron rangers but that’s now more only on specific occasions where as these are my daily driver. Red wing stopped making these for a while and I wanted another pair of resoleable Chelsea’s so I bought a pair of Thursday but I’m no where near as happy with those. Those only get worn when I need a black dressy boot now.
Buy here to support the channel: Red Wing Classic Chelsea - bit.ly/47RNEAz Red Wing Iron Ranger - bit.ly/40FZYBp Red Wing 875 Moc Toe - bit.ly/3szaLAD Red Wing 1907 Moc Toe - bit.ly/40Dnxea
I have these RW Chelsea boots and blundstones. While they are both great I find myself grabbing the Blundstones quite a bit more. I keep these in the rotation but if I had to recommend one or the other it’d be the Blundstones. I find both to pretty durable overall.
I have a black harness leather pair of these Chelsea boots, I like them, I sized down a full size from my typical size and they fit me good. The poron insole is used in some of Redwing’s other work boots and I’ve never had any issues with it. It makes for a comfortable and long lasting boot. I have a pair of their 953’s and they have the poron insole and I like it, I’ve had those for 2 years and they’re doing just fine in my opinion.
Lets be honest, it's difficult to make a business case against offering some boots constructed like this. If there's people that don't like it, it's pretty safe to say that they weren't the target customer of this product anyway; the traditional boots haven't went away. You're just expanding your offerings to a larger variety to hit a larger potential customer base. I think Porsche may be the ultimate example of this sort of thing. Through the '70s, '80s, & '90s, while they were CRUSHING it in racing, they were fledgling as an actual business. But, in 2003, they did the *UNTHINKABLE* - they introduced the Cayenne, an SUV. Outrage, women crying, the horror... meanwhile, the income that Porsche has made off of just the Cayenne alone has COMPLETELY changed the company; and the 911s got better, the Boxsters/Caymans got better, the halo supercars got even more extreme, the Cayenne has made Porsche a better company on all fronts. Even the enthusiast one. OK, so maybe swapping out a little bit of leather for a little bit of foam in certain boots isn't going to be Red Wing's 'Cayenne moment'™, but it gets the point across lol
Porsche was getting crushed by McLaren, Nissan and BMW… but hey, at least they make cars that can kill you. They made the cayenne because they weren’t competitive, they just have fanboys, I definitely like the 911 though.
@@Muscovy7 ? McLaren was beaten by the Porsche GT1 and the TWR-Porsche as soon as the first debut year of the Mclaren ended and others adapted to them. Year later McLaren lost again against TWR-Porsche and a Courage C41 (Porsche engine). Mercedes was also a contender.
the problem is this thinking quickly leads to companies moving to a more profit driven model. this almost always leads to downgrades in quality of products that the brand has always been known for, while the prices stay the same. but as you said, it's understandable, because it's easier to make a profit when you can use your brand name to justify the price of a product that is cheaper to make. because it's crazy hard these days to make enough money out of a domestically produced high quality product. however. greed is a helluva thing. there's a huge risk of the brand being destroyed as they're no longer producing the quality they're known for. some even hike the prices up, because they get thirstier for bigger profits.
I don't see a vw coming in buying the whole operation in this case. But I kinda see your point. These boots are fantastic. The first generation cayenne wasn't.
Dude, it's like you read my mind! I've been looking at these again since they released the black harness. Increased comfort out of the box is a win for these old dogs, so that aspect is drawing me in. Price is high, but as you point out not THAT much more than Blundstones. A Blundstone alt I'm still super curious about is the Canada West chelseas (I think they might call them romeos). Made in CA, Vibram soles, hard to find in the US.
All I can say is I’ve been wearing Danner boots all different styles for 25 years. I got my first redwing Chelsea slip on the heritage. I think it’s called. It’s a thinner slip on. I was impressed with the foot measuring process. It told me a lot about my feet which I knew, but I wasn’t sure, they gave the whole measurement they sent it to my email so it shows me every facet of my foot. It’s pretty amazing the break-in. I’ve had it for about four days and they’re really tight but my feet my toes can move around no problem they fit so freaking well it’s insane. I finally got the confidence, buying boots boots, and you know boots are they fit all different everything fits different for some reason but I’m finally home. I finally got a really good Fit and I’m completely satisfied it’s pretty amazing actually
Whites has recently released a plain toe, wedge sole boot names “Springdale.” I think you would love it. It has the C461 last, which is similar to the their 4811 Smoke Jumper last and Bakers/Whites Bounty Hunter last.
I definitely want to see a comparison to Blundstones, but I'd also be interested in looking at the vibram soled "All Terrain Boots" blundstones to see if there is any improvement other than the sole
Here's a vote for that comparison video! In the meantime, the price seems like a reasonable premium to pay for a premium Chelsea boot that still understands that that market is gonna be expecting comfort.
I have tried Tecovas, Thursday, Red Back, & Blundstone trying to find the best chelsea boots for me. I have high arches and the Red Wing chelsea boot is the most comfortable for me.
I'm really considering these boots for that same reason, I currently have the redbacks. And while they are great long lasting boots I just feel like the comfort isn't the best for me especially working for 10 hours a day. And I also do have high arcs would you recommend these?
Watching this video while wearing these boots in ebony harness. I have to say, they were extremely comfy since day 1. I wanted some comfy slip on boots because I was jealous of my wife’s blundstones. If this is what you want, these are head and shoulders better than blundstones and worth ever penny of the extra $75. Plus, the pull-up on the ebony harness is developing a great patina
This is a great looking, comfortable, well made boot. I wear these for lighter day construction work in finished houses, punchlisting, etc, as well as at the office, and going out. Versatile and clean up really well. The leather & construction are a noticeable notch above a Blundstone or Danner.
I have these and blundstones and I prefer these. Less cushion but they are more comfortable and have held up better. I don’t think this is redwing cheapening or regressing, it is just a different purpose and a different product. Similar to the traction tred iron rangers
Ups and downs to each. Been wearing red wings exclusively for 25 years. I work construction and bought a pair of red wing 2412 and I love them. Super durable. All the safety protection I need, but the break in was a bit rough. I bought the safety toe wing shooter st 8" with the traction tred, all the safety I need, and they were comfortable out of the box, but part of the sole is wearing after about 8 months. These are the best brand boot for the price especially for construction. IMHO. I think red wing is also noticing that a lot of people buying boots now are not using them for traditional reasons that heritage boots were made for i.e. logging, construction, blacksmithing. They like the look, but want the comfort. Just bought a pair of the red wing black Chelsea's for casual use and I am waiting by the door.
Id love to see the revival of the MITUSA. Next suggestion would be the Danner Sierra/Grouse. Half canvas uppers, and have been my favorite style for a decade+
I just wanted to let you know that because of your channel I was able to arm myself with enough information to find myself a perfect pair of hiking boots. I'm going on a trip over new years and I've been planning it all year and cannot wait -- and now my feet will be happy too!
This is the important part. As long as they don‘t cut corners on the classics, sure try out something new. Many people complain about the break-in, so maybe they can reach a new customer demographic.
All I can say is I’ve been wearing Danner boots all different styles for 25 years. I got my first redwing Chelsea slip on the heritage. I think it’s called. It’s a thinner slip on. I was impressed with the foot measuring process. It told me a lot about my feet which I knew, but I wasn’t sure, they gave the whole measurement they sent it to my email so it shows me every facet of my foot. It’s pretty amazing the break-in. I’ve had it for about four days and they’re really tight but my feet my toes can move around no problem they fit so freaking well it’s insane. I finally got the confidence, buying boots boots, and you know boots are they fit all different everything fits different for some reason but I’m finally home. I finally got a really good Fit and I’m completely satisfied it’s pretty amazing actually I don’t care about the break-in. Never have I just want good quality boots and if they break in sooner that’s even better. It’s really cool that you cut them open and look at them. I’ve been buying boots for 25 years. never knew what they were made of just assumed they were awesome, but I no longer buy $450 diners I realize that I don’t need all of that. I just need something lightweight good leather and that’s comfortable and that grips good and doesn’t slip on services. That’s all I care about.
I think that's an accurate way of explaining it. I understand the need for tradition but also the room for people who may only buy this one pair that aren't really boot folks.
I just got a pair of and out of the box they are more comfortable that some of the sneakers I've been wearing most of my life. Just now getting into Red Wing boots after 36 years of wearing Nikes.
I think your comparison with Blundstones is apt because this seems to be Red Wing's answer to the popularity of those boots. In fact, I bet their internal meetings were built around competing and beating them.
I agree 100%. Redwing has a really big line and needs to appeal to a lot of customers. The boots I’ve always bought are the heavy work boots, but I totally understand the client who would want something like this.
Part of the reason for Blundstones popularity is because they make good hiking boots. The crepe sole on these Redwings makes it obvious they are not geared toward hikers. Not to mention crepe soles with no heel being ugly.
I agree, although I’ve broken in a half dozen pairs of red wings, and I’m fine with it however, I know several people who the first comment they make is “ Man, I never wear red wings because they hurt I buy xxxxx boot because they’re comfortable right out of the box 1st day”. Read it and whatever working me an accent you prefer.
I've been wearing the amber harness for a month now, but I'm considering getting the black harness. They're incredibly comfortable, almost like wearing sneakers.
I have three pairs of Iron Rangers and agree that there is definitely an extended break-in time, but that's okay with me. If I'm paying 300-plus dollars for a boot I want long-lasting quality.
I'm an old school guy that loves the feeling of a durable and long lasting footwear. However, I recently bought a slip on Wolverine to wear as a garage/muck easy to put on boot and was disappointed with them. They got flimsier the longer I wore them and left me wanting a more durable slip on boot. This particular boot can definitely fill a gap in my boot lineup and it might be the boot I buy next. I still love my Iron Rangers and my 606 Red Wing boots and one could say my feet only like Red Wings boots. I also only wear Allen Edmonds shoes because I think they are very comfortable. Also, both are American made, just wish Allen Edmonds sourced all their leather in America.
I have a question. Since the welt is stitched to the gemming and the sole is attached to the welt, then the entire upper is only attached to the sole by glue. So in that case the Goodyear welt is not much sturdier than just glue? I am not talking about the recraft ability. When the Goodyear welt was first introduced it was stitched directly to the insole, but as it became more industrialized gemming came into the picture. and if the gemming is not stitched to the insole there is nothing but glue keeping the upper and sole together
I have weekender chukkas that I essentially wear in lieu of a casual sneaker. I don't always want or need the bulk of a 6" boot. The weekenders have completely synthetic soles, and are stitchdown instead of GYW. The entire concept of that line is a product that is lightweight and for light duty. This product is clearly an in between, along with the wedge iron ranger. Neither of these are new, or a change of direction - but built for a different purpose.
Would love a tier list boots, especially chelsea ones. Let's say for X budget, that would be amazing. And although they all look nice I'm not sure how they'd do in canadian winter (-20C) and often walking on snow even in cities. Anybody use them as daily boots even in harsh winter?
I like the way they look in Hawthorne but i just dont like crepe soles the way I used to. and im uncertain if red wing has a similar style and weight of sole to that of a blundstone available to replace it when it inevitably does start to wear. These could either be a great blundstone alternative with the good construction and leather lining or twice the weight depending on if you put a vibram sole and heel on it
I got the same boot in the same color back when they first came out. And as someone who owns in his fully broken in and iron ranger and this classic. Chelsea, the break in time significantly different two weeks versus 6 weeks. But now that they're both broken in, they are equally comfortable. My only complaint with the boot is I personally don't like the traction tread sole. So I got them resoled last year and had them put on a heel
That sole is the biggest drawback of these boots. I can go on a fairly extensive hike in my Blundstones, these don't look like good hiking soles to me.
Red Wing has a fairly large position in my boot collection. I have both the work chelsea and mocktoe. Wear both regularly, and will say that the mocktoe was absolutely brutal to break in….but worth it. My go to grab and go boot, for comfort, is the red wing weekender chelsea. Definitely not the same quality construction as the other boots, but once broken in feels like wearing a pair of running shoes
Probably trying to catch the Blundstone tidal wave to be honest. they're everywhere and super comfortable. If Red Wing ditches the 6mm veg tan insole for iron rangers proper, than yes theyre sunk.
I have had these boots for a year. I don’t wear them for work in the summer as a finish carpenter, because I wear vans for the balance aspect and mobility. These boots have taken ages to break in. I ended up taking them into redwing to have them stretch the arches for me. The one thing that blows my mind about redwing, is the customer service at their stores. I don’t know anyone else that offers what they do
Yeah, all the red wing stores I've been to were fantastic with the customer service except one place: Chattanooga, TN. The guy that has worked there for 5+ years is truly an asshole. He's pretty damn stupid too because I brought a pair in to resole and the outside (pinky toe side) was rubbed down much more than the inside of the foot and I said "yeah, I have a supination problem" and he said "yeah hahah, that's called pronation dude", and I was like "wow DUDE, you do this for living and you don't know the difference between supination and pronation? You're quite the genius". Anyway-- the dude was constantly giving me a hard time every time I went in so it was great to make him feel like an idiot.
Redwing is constantly changing and evolving even though imo they really don’t need too. I think their heritage line has been fantastic, I’ve had dozens of different pairs! Iron rangers, moc toes, blacksmiths, Cooper Mocs, sawmills, and a few other ones! This doesn’t include their work line, I’ve had quite a few of those too. The bad thing about redwing is you’ll find your favorite boot, and they’ll discontinue it! I live in my 953’s which are USA made and have a poron insole instead of leather, but they’re comfortable and they last! Basic leather boot with a shockingly supportive and slip resistant supersoles! Check ‘em out! Anyway I used to wear the 952’s which was a 6” version of the 953, discontinued it… of course. I still miss the 1178 pecos and the 2112 insulated work boots. I also wish they bring back the smooth cork soles too!! Those were epically good imo
O I think they’re definitely a well built strong long lasting boot. They have a mini lug vibram sole which is actually long lasting. I preferred the old smooth cork style soles but I can see why they went with the mini lug. Other than that change a few years back they’re still well built and tough boots. Id Recommend them
Here's what I don't understand. They only make a limited set of these boots on a wide last, but they are ALWAYS sold out. I would have bought a pair of these today if they had any that would fit. I'm constantly looking for something quick to put on.
I'm a thorogood guy because of there day one comfort. I'm hard on my boots and my only complaint with thorogood is the soles wear out fast. I'm considering giving these a try
Can you make a video comparing Nike by you products to the regular version? I'm super curios to see the differences as I know the materials are different! Love the videos! Very unique content
Solid info, sort of bummed on the sole. I feel like the business owner in you understands the decision but the leather purist in you resisted. You made me come around to it overall and now I’d love to see the Blundstone x Redwing comparison. Also, it would be cool see some more companies in the Mitusa series - maybe some east coast/New England companies.
Question: when scraping the cork during a resole, how do you avoid damaging the foam under the insole when the cork is applied directly to the underside of that insole?
I like these because they seem to be bit of a hybrid; not quite a beefy moc toe but an upgraded Chelsea. I do like the aesthetic of a single pull tab and the harness leather and white Christy sole. I recently got my Beckett Simonon Silvas and while they have twin pull tabs, they are easy to doff/don and somewhat surprised my doctor by removing them so quickly (I usually see him when wearing my lace up work boots). Not a fan of the toe but still seems like a good boot for its intended purpose, given the materials used.
2 best brand of boots I ever owned were Is Wolverine 600 g marauders and Rocky 600 g boots . Both lace to toe. I searched through your videos and I didn't find anything on rocky boots or American made Wolverine bootsWould like to see you do more cold weather style boots for outdoors people
A slip on boot that's easy to break in seems like a good one to have in the arsenal. I was curious about the shank on this boot, but it wasn't mentioned. I'll go back and see if I can find it
Iirc Redwing doesn't put shanks in their crepe sole boots because they don't need the support as much when there's no heel. I think I've seen someone ask for a resole on their Moc toes to a more standard sole/heel and they added a shank but not sure where that was or if it's normal for them.
@@StephenSchoettler interesting I tried a pair on today 10 and 10.5w witch was to big it’s between a 10 witch felt alil tight in the width of my right foot but the guy said they stretch out and I guess I wouldn’t want it to loose . The length felt right i usually wear a 10 . Did the width stretch out ?
@@garrettyourboi5066 I wouldn't plan on the width stretching like that. The synthetic material construction is different than the leather construction. They should feel comfortable from the start imo.
@@garrettyourboi5066 I'm not sure I'd suggest getting the Chelsea as your first Red Wings. If they don't fit good you're going to hate them. My IR's and Mocs are too big, but they are manageable because of the laces. It took me some trial and error. Well that and $$$.
So, little beknownst to all this is the second change redwing has made to this boot, when they released these in the ebony harness the boot was completely different internally, the vamp liner was made of a synthetic material and the foot bed was poron. They have since updated it to what you see here. Which is a vast improvement. There is another reason these aren't made like the ranger or the MT. In a chelsea it is the shape of the boot that holds it to your foot. If all natural materials were used each boot would have to be custom made to fit, these modern materials allow a limited number of sizes to fit a greater majority of feet.
I love Iron Rangers, but I can't see the use case. I wouldn't wear them in summer, they're not really a winter boot, nor are they a dress boot, and they're not a hiking/outdoor boot either. So unless you have a job that requires footwear like this, what are they really for and how are they practical? As I said, I love the way they look, but I can't fathom where I would actually wear them.
I live in Canada, finding good warm winter boots that would last more than a season or two, has been a massive challenge lately. Is there a video on this channel about that?
My iron rangers were not comfortable out of the box but are extremely comfortable now. I bought them 7 years ago. I bought the redwing chelsea boots and loved them for the first 9 months. They fell apart at around 18 months.
On top of the quality-only leaderboards you do, it would be great to see the same but for value. i.e. price vs non-price could be worth 50% each. Whilst i think it's cool seeing boots that are the best they can be, when I buy them I'm looking at balancing cost and quality. Just a thought.
Can you get your hands on the Danner R.A.T. military boot? I personally love them and would love to see what’s inside. Willco & Bates were also contracted to produce the R.A.T. boot but from my research the Danner is by far the preferred version. Thx
Since winter is coming up, it'd be cool to see you check out some of nokians winter boots if you review winter boots again! They're great cold weather boots and the company has a cool history as they used to be apart of nokia!
I have a pair of Solovair Chelseas and a Red Wing store down the street so I'm curious about a comparison between those two. Would still def love to see RW vs Blundtstone tho
Can you compare these boots to the Thursday iteration of these boots? I feel for $300 I expect a leather midsole, but I get why redwing would make it with “softer” internal materials. But I think $300 might be a stretch if the Thursday’s are built with similar materials (minus being USA materials/assembled)
Weston - you inspired me to buy a pair of New Balance sneakers collaboration with Horween, as well as order two pairs of Jim Greens - the Barefoot African Rangers in both colors. You are the f***ing man. Keep on doing what you’re doing, brother. Affirmative, I would like to see the comparison of the Chelsea boots hands down !
The whole brands going down hill and catering toward yuppies and boyfriend boots for dinner it’s pathetic they won’t make more 877s (Any 8in moc) in different colors
honestly I swear the thick leather insole is one of the last parts of the boot to go in and is not integral to the structure- surely they should just offer the option of both and you can pay more if you want that part instead or as well
I have these in ebony and amber harness and am quite fond of them. I can see where the purists might not like some of the the things like the foam, but I can't complain about the easy break-in either. They look good and are easy to wear, have great leather so I can let the hard core heritage changes slide for this style since I still have my Iron Rangers and Moc Toes. Great analysis as usual. By the way, where's Toaster these days?
I'd love to see more mid-high end boot brands, especially the smaller ones with cult followings like Truman, Oak Street, Parkhurst, and Bordon (stitchdown boots, great leather, awesome construction). You can explore different components - for example, I don't think you've ever cut apart an Itshide sole or a CF Stead leather. You mentioned in the Grant Stone video that they are the best value boots, but it's hard to say that when you haven't really compared with anything else in the same tier!
I’ve worn a pair of Red Wong Ashby Moc Toes throughout the entirety of my adult working career (which is really only about 5 years 😆) and i love them. Recently got a pair of the classic mocs and also really love them. Break In period is a B-Word but i love them nonetheless and i can feel the comfort really coming in. I really love the only ways of doing things especially with boots and people should tru and break in a leather insole at least once in their lives. With that being said, i love the idea that Red Wing is making heritage boots with a few tweaked alterations to give an alternative to those who want a nicer made boot but are afraid to or don’t know how yo properly break in a boot. I personally really want to try a pair if Iron Rangers with the traction Sole. There’s nothing wrong with expanding to get more people into boots. Peeps needs to stop gatekeeping the boot world.
Here's a vote for the comparison with Blundstone, I'd wager this new RW chelsea with superior materials and out-of-the-box comfort would be better value. As long as they maintain the original heritage line I'm fine with this shift. Sometimes you just need a boot that works straightaway without spending the time on a lengthy break in. Everything else is made to the high standards of Red Wing and I'd bet that when eventually getting these resoled you could request a full leather footbed.
For a free trial of Shopify, please go to shopify.com/roseanvil
$150. Shoes
What is inside the red wing chukka boots ?
I own many Red Wing Heritage boots (old guy), and I don’t need a Classic Chelsea to imitate an Iron Ranger. Just like I don’t need my Traction-Tread Iron Rangers to replicate my other Iron Rangers. Variation and experimentation requires a desire to succeed and willingness to fail. Good on Red Wing to try. The “chattering-class” might have to catch up. And my Black Harness Classic Chelsea boots are a groovy option that I plan to wear tonight as we go see The Eagles in concert. Thanks for your thoughts and reviews, always worth a watch and listen.
I have these in Ebony Harness and they’re probably my most comfortable pair in my collection. Great for going out and taking my dog for his walk in the morning. Not traditional but as long as they keep making the more heritage styles, these are a welcome style. Blundstone killers for sure.
I can concur.
I have the same ones. Can’t afford the nicks Chelsea, but want more durability than the Blundstones. This feels like a perfect in the middle choice
@@Benjels480 I agree, well placed in the tier. The Nicks chelseas look sooo badass
Not so fast with the "Blundstone killers"
I've literally climbed mountains in my Blundstones. Judging by the sole and tread of these boots, they're not proper hikers.
Are these boots on the heavier side?
I have 7 Red Wing Heritage boots currently, including these Chelseas. I’ve owned Blundstones. These will last for a decade or more and can be resolved. Blundstones are a year of wear, maybe two if you are lucky, and still made in MN. Some of the materials in the insole have been changed/added for comfort, but there is no drop in quality. The addition of the traction Tred Iron Ranger is a new model, not a replacement. It’s a little hyperbolic to suggest that suddenly they are trying to pull a fast one on buyers: it’s a high quality alternative for those who want additional comfort and no break in, and only for a little more than the mass market Blundstones.
I really like that they put the leather on top of the foam instead of the opposite! Much nicer for comfort/climate. It looks like a good compromise for fast comfort.
Also, companies have to do something to keep prices reasonable.
I’d love to see a comparison between the Redwing Chelseas and Blundstones. A lot of folks throw shade on Bludstones because of their constructions. But they are very comfortable. I’m with you, I find myself wearing my one pair of Blundstones more than the multiple pairs of Red Wings I own.
Longterm and support-wise the redwings will be better. The blundstones will be more comfortable in short walks, etc. But the blundstones rely heavily on an insole for support, which insoles wear out often.
Redbacks over Blundstones any day.
I’d like to see this also!
Compare Rossi boots 👌👌👌
Redback over Blundstone all day long.
Different boots for different uses. If you need a hard working hard wear boot you get the traditional ones that are purpose built. These new Chelsea boots seem more for "dressing up" or doing work on your feet all day where maybe you're in a factory or on pavement and not in dirt or mud. Built more for comfort than hard use while still being durable and repairable.
I agree. This style of boots will never have the same durability as regular full leather boots. The stretchy synthetic part will wear out and then you throw the chelsea boots away. So why not focus on comfort instead.
I picked up a pair on sale last year. Get a lot of compliments on these. One or two wearings and they’re broken in, compared to my Beckman’s that took a week or more. I think I’ve maintained them once and they still look good. Great casual boots
This channel convinced me to switch from cheap boots to a good pair of nicks, quickly becoming one of my most favorite channels!
I bought a pair of these in ebony harness when they were first released and they are far and away the most comfortable pair of boots I have ever owned. I wear these daily and they are still holding up great.
I’ve had this boot now for about 3 years and I love them. They are my all purpose boot. I still wear my iron rangers but that’s now more only on specific occasions where as these are my daily driver. Red wing stopped making these for a while and I wanted another pair of resoleable Chelsea’s so I bought a pair of Thursday but I’m no where near as happy with those. Those only get worn when I need a black dressy boot now.
Buy here to support the channel:
Red Wing Classic Chelsea - bit.ly/47RNEAz
Red Wing Iron Ranger - bit.ly/40FZYBp
Red Wing 875 Moc Toe - bit.ly/3szaLAD
Red Wing 1907 Moc Toe - bit.ly/40Dnxea
For a free trial of Shopify, please go to shopify.com/roseanvil
I have these RW Chelsea boots and blundstones. While they are both great I find myself grabbing the Blundstones quite a bit more. I keep these in the rotation but if I had to recommend one or the other it’d be the Blundstones. I find both to pretty durable overall.
Where are those pigskin Japanese war boot collabs?
They haven’t come yet?
I was wondering that as well!
I've wondered the same...
I really want the 9060 Beckman Flatbox in Black Klondike to come to the US
Yup I’ve been wondering about the collaboration too. Any news?
I have a black harness leather pair of these Chelsea boots, I like them, I sized down a full size from my typical size and they fit me good. The poron insole is used in some of Redwing’s other work boots and I’ve never had any issues with it. It makes for a comfortable and long lasting boot. I have a pair of their 953’s and they have the poron insole and I like it, I’ve had those for 2 years and they’re doing just fine in my opinion.
Considering one of the biggest complaints Redwing has is based on the difficult break-in, the addition of pouron/foam should help address that.
Lets be honest, it's difficult to make a business case against offering some boots constructed like this. If there's people that don't like it, it's pretty safe to say that they weren't the target customer of this product anyway; the traditional boots haven't went away. You're just expanding your offerings to a larger variety to hit a larger potential customer base.
I think Porsche may be the ultimate example of this sort of thing. Through the '70s, '80s, & '90s, while they were CRUSHING it in racing, they were fledgling as an actual business. But, in 2003, they did the *UNTHINKABLE* - they introduced the Cayenne, an SUV. Outrage, women crying, the horror... meanwhile, the income that Porsche has made off of just the Cayenne alone has COMPLETELY changed the company; and the 911s got better, the Boxsters/Caymans got better, the halo supercars got even more extreme, the Cayenne has made Porsche a better company on all fronts. Even the enthusiast one.
OK, so maybe swapping out a little bit of leather for a little bit of foam in certain boots isn't going to be Red Wing's 'Cayenne moment'™, but it gets the point across lol
Porsche was getting crushed by McLaren, Nissan and BMW… but hey, at least they make cars that can kill you. They made the cayenne because they weren’t competitive, they just have fanboys, I definitely like the 911 though.
@@Muscovy7 ?
McLaren was beaten by the Porsche GT1 and the TWR-Porsche as soon as the first debut year of the Mclaren ended and others adapted to them. Year later McLaren lost again against TWR-Porsche and a Courage C41 (Porsche engine). Mercedes was also a contender.
the problem is this thinking quickly leads to companies moving to a more profit driven model. this almost always leads to downgrades in quality of products that the brand has always been known for, while the prices stay the same.
but as you said, it's understandable, because it's easier to make a profit when you can use your brand name to justify the price of a product that is cheaper to make.
because it's crazy hard these days to make enough money out of a domestically produced high quality product.
however. greed is a helluva thing. there's a huge risk of the brand being destroyed as they're no longer producing the quality they're known for. some even hike the prices up, because they get thirstier for bigger profits.
I don't see a vw coming in buying the whole operation in this case. But I kinda see your point. These boots are fantastic. The first generation cayenne wasn't.
Dude, it's like you read my mind! I've been looking at these again since they released the black harness. Increased comfort out of the box is a win for these old dogs, so that aspect is drawing me in. Price is high, but as you point out not THAT much more than Blundstones. A Blundstone alt I'm still super curious about is the Canada West chelseas (I think they might call them romeos). Made in CA, Vibram soles, hard to find in the US.
All I can say is I’ve been wearing Danner boots all different styles for 25 years. I got my first redwing Chelsea slip on the heritage. I think it’s called. It’s a thinner slip on. I was impressed with the foot measuring process. It told me a lot about my feet which I knew, but I wasn’t sure, they gave the whole measurement they sent it to my email so it shows me every facet of my foot. It’s pretty amazing the break-in. I’ve had it for about four days and they’re really tight but my feet my toes can move around no problem they fit so freaking well it’s insane. I finally got the confidence, buying boots boots, and you know boots are they fit all different everything fits different for some reason but I’m finally home. I finally got a really good Fit and I’m completely satisfied it’s pretty amazing actually
Whites has recently released a plain toe, wedge sole boot names “Springdale.” I think you would love it.
It has the C461 last, which is similar to the their 4811 Smoke Jumper last and Bakers/Whites Bounty Hunter last.
I definitely want to see a comparison to Blundstones, but I'd also be interested in looking at the vibram soled "All Terrain Boots" blundstones to see if there is any improvement other than the sole
Here's a vote for that comparison video! In the meantime, the price seems like a reasonable premium to pay for a premium Chelsea boot that still understands that that market is gonna be expecting comfort.
I have tried Tecovas, Thursday, Red Back, & Blundstone trying to find the best chelsea boots for me. I have high arches and the Red Wing chelsea boot is the most comfortable for me.
I'm really considering these boots for that same reason, I currently have the redbacks. And while they are great long lasting boots I just feel like the comfort isn't the best for me especially working for 10 hours a day. And I also do have high arcs would you recommend these?
@@Ellacost831 maybe not. I am selling my tecocas lukes
@@ScreaminpirateEDC I meant to ask if you would recommend these Redwings Chelsea?
@@Ellacost831 I like the red wings more
Watching this video while wearing these boots in ebony harness. I have to say, they were extremely comfy since day 1. I wanted some comfy slip on boots because I was jealous of my wife’s blundstones. If this is what you want, these are head and shoulders better than blundstones and worth ever penny of the extra $75. Plus, the pull-up on the ebony harness is developing a great patina
This is a great looking, comfortable, well made boot. I wear these for lighter day construction work in finished houses, punchlisting, etc, as well as at the office, and going out. Versatile and clean up really well. The leather & construction are a noticeable notch above a Blundstone or Danner.
I have these and blundstones and I prefer these. Less cushion but they are more comfortable and have held up better. I don’t think this is redwing cheapening or regressing, it is just a different purpose and a different product. Similar to the traction tred iron rangers
Ups and downs to each. Been wearing red wings exclusively for 25 years. I work construction and bought a pair of red wing 2412 and I love them. Super durable. All the safety protection I need, but the break in was a bit rough. I bought the safety toe wing shooter st 8" with the traction tred, all the safety I need, and they were comfortable out of the box, but part of the sole is wearing after about 8 months. These are the best brand boot for the price especially for construction. IMHO. I think red wing is also noticing that a lot of people buying boots now are not using them for traditional reasons that heritage boots were made for i.e. logging, construction, blacksmithing. They like the look, but want the comfort. Just bought a pair of the red wing black Chelsea's for casual use and I am waiting by the door.
Recently bought them, they work for my job and what I do. So far like them. Mostly bought them for leather and putting shoes on/off quickly.
Id love to see the revival of the MITUSA. Next suggestion would be the Danner Sierra/Grouse. Half canvas uppers, and have been my favorite style for a decade+
I just wanted to let you know that because of your channel I was able to arm myself with enough information to find myself a perfect pair of hiking boots. I'm going on a trip over new years and I've been planning it all year and cannot wait -- and now my feet will be happy too!
I don’t mind RW or others trying new in new-style boots, but I wish they’d leave the heritage, MITUSA, and classics alone.
This is the important part. As long as they don‘t cut corners on the classics, sure try out something new. Many people complain about the break-in, so maybe they can reach a new customer demographic.
All I can say is I’ve been wearing Danner boots all different styles for 25 years. I got my first redwing Chelsea slip on the heritage. I think it’s called. It’s a thinner slip on. I was impressed with the foot measuring process. It told me a lot about my feet which I knew, but I wasn’t sure, they gave the whole measurement they sent it to my email so it shows me every facet of my foot. It’s pretty amazing the break-in. I’ve had it for about four days and they’re really tight but my feet my toes can move around no problem they fit so freaking well it’s insane. I finally got the confidence, buying boots boots, and you know boots are they fit all different everything fits different for some reason but I’m finally home. I finally got a really good Fit and I’m completely satisfied it’s pretty amazing actually I don’t care about the break-in. Never have I just want good quality boots and if they break in sooner that’s even better. It’s really cool that you cut them open and look at them. I’ve been buying boots for 25 years. never knew what they were made of just assumed they were awesome, but I no longer buy $450 diners I realize that I don’t need all of that. I just need something lightweight good leather and that’s comfortable and that grips good and doesn’t slip on services. That’s all I care about.
I think it's good that they are making them more comfortable!
I think that's an accurate way of explaining it. I understand the need for tradition but also the room for people who may only buy this one pair that aren't really boot folks.
I just got a pair of and out of the box they are more comfortable that some of the sneakers I've been wearing most of my life. Just now getting into Red Wing boots after 36 years of wearing Nikes.
The blur for spoiler protection, much appreciated 👌
I recently purchased the Weekender Chelsea, and quite like them. They feature a synthetic footbed, though, and not veg tanned leather.
I think your comparison with Blundstones is apt because this seems to be Red Wing's answer to the popularity of those boots. In fact, I bet their internal meetings were built around competing and beating them.
I agree 100%. Redwing has a really big line and needs to appeal to a lot of customers. The boots I’ve always bought are the heavy work boots, but I totally understand the client who would want something like this.
Part of the reason for Blundstones popularity is because they make good hiking boots. The crepe sole on these Redwings makes it obvious they are not geared toward hikers. Not to mention crepe soles with no heel being ugly.
Red Wing is making boots that you can comfortably wear right out of the box.
I agree, although I’ve broken in a half dozen pairs of red wings, and I’m fine with it however, I know several people who the first comment they make is “ Man, I never wear red wings because they hurt I buy xxxxx boot because they’re comfortable right out of the box 1st day”. Read it and whatever working me an accent you prefer.
I own more 20 pairs of red wing boots and all of them take time to break in.
I've been wearing the amber harness for a month now, but I'm considering getting the black harness. They're incredibly comfortable, almost like wearing sneakers.
I have three pairs of Iron Rangers and agree that there is definitely an extended break-in time, but that's okay with me. If I'm paying 300-plus dollars for a boot I want long-lasting quality.
I'm an old school guy that loves the feeling of a durable and long lasting footwear. However, I recently bought a slip on Wolverine to wear as a garage/muck easy to put on boot and was disappointed with them. They got flimsier the longer I wore them and left me wanting a more durable slip on boot. This particular boot can definitely fill a gap in my boot lineup and it might be the boot I buy next. I still love my Iron Rangers and my 606 Red Wing boots and one could say my feet only like Red Wings boots. I also only wear Allen Edmonds shoes because I think they are very comfortable. Also, both are American made, just wish Allen Edmonds sourced all their leather in America.
I have a question.
Since the welt is stitched to the gemming and the sole is attached to the welt, then the entire upper is only attached to the sole by glue. So in that case the Goodyear welt is not much sturdier than just glue?
I am not talking about the recraft ability. When the Goodyear welt was first introduced it was stitched directly to the insole, but as it became more industrialized gemming came into the picture. and if the gemming is not stitched to the insole there is nothing but glue keeping the upper and sole together
+1 for the redwing/blundstone comparison.
I have weekender chukkas that I essentially wear in lieu of a casual sneaker. I don't always want or need the bulk of a 6" boot. The weekenders have completely synthetic soles, and are stitchdown instead of GYW. The entire concept of that line is a product that is lightweight and for light duty.
This product is clearly an in between, along with the wedge iron ranger. Neither of these are new, or a change of direction - but built for a different purpose.
Would love a tier list boots, especially chelsea ones. Let's say for X budget, that would be amazing. And although they all look nice I'm not sure how they'd do in canadian winter (-20C) and often walking on snow even in cities. Anybody use them as daily boots even in harsh winter?
I like the way they look in Hawthorne but i just dont like crepe soles the way I used to. and im uncertain if red wing has a similar style and weight of sole to that of a blundstone available to replace it when it inevitably does start to wear. These could either be a great blundstone alternative with the good construction and leather lining or twice the weight depending on if you put a vibram sole and heel on it
I got the same boot in the same color back when they first came out. And as someone who owns in his fully broken in and iron ranger and this classic. Chelsea, the break in time significantly different two weeks versus 6 weeks. But now that they're both broken in, they are equally comfortable. My only complaint with the boot is I personally don't like the traction tread sole. So I got them resoled last year and had them put on a heel
bruh
That sole is the biggest drawback of these boots.
I can go on a fairly extensive hike in my Blundstones, these don't look like good hiking soles to me.
I don't need boots ATM but i really like the detail in your videos and the production values are excellent. I'm happy to see your success.
I guess they have be softer on the sole for the break-in to really work as a Chelsea, as you can’t really counter the stiffness with laces. 🤷♂️
I want to know how this compares to the Thursday Legend. I really want a Chelsea boot but i am not sure which one to get
Red Wing has a fairly large position in my boot collection. I have both the work chelsea and mocktoe. Wear both regularly, and will say that the mocktoe was absolutely brutal to break in….but worth it. My go to grab and go boot, for comfort, is the red wing weekender chelsea. Definitely not the same quality construction as the other boots, but once broken in feels like wearing a pair of running shoes
Probably trying to catch the Blundstone tidal wave to be honest. they're everywhere and super comfortable.
If Red Wing ditches the 6mm veg tan insole for iron rangers proper, than yes theyre sunk.
As long as their heritage line sticks to the thick leather insole I think they’re good; however 300 dollars sounds abit steep for these.
I have had these boots for a year. I don’t wear them for work in the summer as a finish carpenter, because I wear vans for the balance aspect and mobility. These boots have taken ages to break in. I ended up taking them into redwing to have them stretch the arches for me. The one thing that blows my mind about redwing, is the customer service at their stores. I don’t know anyone else that offers what they do
Yeah, all the red wing stores I've been to were fantastic with the customer service except one place: Chattanooga, TN. The guy that has worked there for 5+ years is truly an asshole. He's pretty damn stupid too because I brought a pair in to resole and the outside (pinky toe side) was rubbed down much more than the inside of the foot and I said "yeah, I have a supination problem" and he said "yeah hahah, that's called pronation dude", and I was like "wow DUDE, you do this for living and you don't know the difference between supination and pronation? You're quite the genius". Anyway-- the dude was constantly giving me a hard time every time I went in so it was great to make him feel like an idiot.
Agreed, I think this is definitely RW’s answer to Blundstones and if you’re comparing to those these seem better. Thanks for the review!
Redwing is constantly changing and evolving even though imo they really don’t need too. I think their heritage line has been fantastic, I’ve had dozens of different pairs! Iron rangers, moc toes, blacksmiths, Cooper Mocs, sawmills, and a few other ones! This doesn’t include their work line, I’ve had quite a few of those too. The bad thing about redwing is you’ll find your favorite boot, and they’ll discontinue it! I live in my 953’s which are USA made and have a poron insole instead of leather, but they’re comfortable and they last! Basic leather boot with a shockingly supportive and slip resistant supersoles! Check ‘em out! Anyway I used to wear the 952’s which was a 6” version of the 953, discontinued it… of course. I still miss the 1178 pecos and the 2112 insulated work boots. I also wish they bring back the smooth cork soles too!! Those were epically good imo
are iron rangers still as strong as they used to be?
O I think they’re definitely a well built strong long lasting boot. They have a mini lug vibram sole which is actually long lasting. I preferred the old smooth cork style soles but I can see why they went with the mini lug. Other than that change a few years back they’re still well built and tough boots. Id Recommend them
@@NDB469 Thanx!
Here's what I don't understand. They only make a limited set of these boots on a wide last, but they are ALWAYS sold out. I would have bought a pair of these today if they had any that would fit. I'm constantly looking for something quick to put on.
Check out Silverado boots. Made by Abilene boot company. Based in Somerset PA. Claims to be USA made
I'm a thorogood guy because of there day one comfort. I'm hard on my boots and my only complaint with thorogood is the soles wear out fast. I'm considering giving these a try
Can you make a video comparing Nike by you products to the regular version? I'm super curios to see the differences as I know the materials are different! Love the videos! Very unique content
Solid info, sort of bummed on the sole. I feel like the business owner in you understands the decision but the leather purist in you resisted. You made me come around to it overall and now I’d love to see the Blundstone x Redwing comparison. Also, it would be cool see some more companies in the Mitusa series - maybe some east coast/New England companies.
Question: when scraping the cork during a resole, how do you avoid damaging the foam under the insole when the cork is applied directly to the underside of that insole?
I like these because they seem to be bit of a hybrid; not quite a beefy moc toe but an upgraded Chelsea. I do like the aesthetic of a single pull tab and the harness leather and white Christy sole. I recently got my Beckett Simonon Silvas and while they have twin pull tabs, they are easy to doff/don and somewhat surprised my doctor by removing them so quickly (I usually see him when wearing my lace up work boots).
Not a fan of the toe but still seems like a good boot for its intended purpose, given the materials used.
2 best brand of boots I ever owned were Is Wolverine 600 g marauders and Rocky 600 g boots . Both lace to toe. I searched through your videos and I didn't find anything on rocky boots or American made Wolverine bootsWould like to see you do more cold weather style boots for outdoors people
A slip on boot that's easy to break in seems like a good one to have in the arsenal. I was curious about the shank on this boot, but it wasn't mentioned. I'll go back and see if I can find it
No shank. It was the Iron Ranger shown having one
Iirc Redwing doesn't put shanks in their crepe sole boots because they don't need the support as much when there's no heel. I think I've seen someone ask for a resole on their Moc toes to a more standard sole/heel and they added a shank but not sure where that was or if it's normal for them.
Currently wearing the Chelsea. I've got a pair of IR's, Moc's, and Blacksmith and the Chelsea's are probably my favorite.
Did you get wide or true to size ?
@@garrettyourboi5066 I've got narrow lady feet. So I went regular width. As for size I went a full size down.
@@StephenSchoettler interesting I tried a pair on today 10 and 10.5w witch was to big it’s between a 10 witch felt alil tight in the width of my right foot but the guy said they stretch out and I guess I wouldn’t want it to loose . The length felt right i usually wear a 10 . Did the width stretch out ?
@@garrettyourboi5066 I wouldn't plan on the width stretching like that. The synthetic material construction is different than the leather construction. They should feel comfortable from the start imo.
@@garrettyourboi5066 I'm not sure I'd suggest getting the Chelsea as your first Red Wings. If they don't fit good you're going to hate them. My IR's and Mocs are too big, but they are manageable because of the laces. It took me some trial and error. Well that and $$$.
So, little beknownst to all this is the second change redwing has made to this boot, when they released these in the ebony harness the boot was completely different internally, the vamp liner was made of a synthetic material and the foot bed was poron. They have since updated it to what you see here. Which is a vast improvement. There is another reason these aren't made like the ranger or the MT. In a chelsea it is the shape of the boot that holds it to your foot. If all natural materials were used each boot would have to be custom made to fit, these modern materials allow a limited number of sizes to fit a greater majority of feet.
I would think you have to make a more flexible sole in a chelsea boot than a lace up boot.
Are you going to review the Jim Green Baobab boots soon? Maybe commission a custom pair of boots from them too?
I love Iron Rangers, but I can't see the use case. I wouldn't wear them in summer, they're not really a winter boot, nor are they a dress boot, and they're not a hiking/outdoor boot either. So unless you have a job that requires footwear like this, what are they really for and how are they practical? As I said, I love the way they look, but I can't fathom where I would actually wear them.
10:07 I want Red Wing vs Blundstone vs Redback plz
Please compare this slip on to the Jim Green Outback. They cost less than 100 USD in South Africa.
I live in Canada, finding good warm winter boots that would last more than a season or two, has been a massive challenge lately. Is there a video on this channel about that?
My iron rangers were not comfortable out of the box but are extremely comfortable now. I bought them 7 years ago.
I bought the redwing chelsea boots and loved them for the first 9 months. They fell apart at around 18 months.
I'm very happy with my heritage red wing chukka boots with wedge soles 3326 . No complaints here .good Everyday worker. I highly recommend
On top of the quality-only leaderboards you do, it would be great to see the same but for value. i.e. price vs non-price could be worth 50% each. Whilst i think it's cool seeing boots that are the best they can be, when I buy them I'm looking at balancing cost and quality. Just a thought.
I bought the 3191 Chelsea’s two years ago. They are completely leather inside the shoe, footbed etc.
Can you get your hands on the Danner R.A.T. military boot? I personally love them and would love to see what’s inside. Willco & Bates were also contracted to produce the R.A.T. boot but from my research the Danner is by far the preferred version. Thx
Since winter is coming up, it'd be cool to see you check out some of nokians winter boots if you review winter boots again! They're great cold weather boots and the company has a cool history as they used to be apart of nokia!
I was just at a local Red Wing store and they told me that they have factories in other US states, not all built in Minnesota.
I have a pair of Solovair Chelseas and a Red Wing store down the street so I'm curious about a comparison between those two. Would still def love to see RW vs Blundtstone tho
I was literally on my way to the Redwing store. When I saw your video pop up I think I may now save up for a pair of nicks Chelsea boots instead
Can you compare these boots to the Thursday iteration of these boots?
I feel for $300 I expect a leather midsole, but I get why redwing would make it with “softer” internal materials.
But I think $300 might be a stretch if the Thursday’s are built with similar materials (minus being USA materials/assembled)
I need a Chelsea for casual wear, easy break in. But want a high quality leather. I would prob lean this was vs. some of the models Thursday’s has.
Heck yeah MITUSA is back! Id love to see a blundstone comparison!
Weston - you inspired me to buy a pair of New Balance sneakers collaboration with Horween, as well as order two pairs of Jim Greens - the Barefoot African Rangers in both colors. You are the f***ing man. Keep on doing what you’re doing, brother. Affirmative, I would like to see the comparison of the Chelsea boots hands down !
The whole brands going down hill and catering toward yuppies and boyfriend boots for dinner it’s pathetic they won’t make more 877s (Any 8in moc) in different colors
Love your vids, can you please do Guidi PL2 boots or 788zs?
honestly I swear the thick leather insole is one of the last parts of the boot to go in and is not integral to the structure- surely they should just offer the option of both and you can pay more if you want that part instead or as well
I have these in ebony and amber harness and am quite fond of them. I can see where the purists might not like some of the the things like the foam, but I can't complain about the easy break-in either. They look good and are easy to wear, have great leather so I can let the hard core heritage changes slide for this style since I still have my Iron Rangers and Moc Toes. Great analysis as usual.
By the way, where's Toaster these days?
I'd love to see more mid-high end boot brands, especially the smaller ones with cult followings like Truman, Oak Street, Parkhurst, and Bordon (stitchdown boots, great leather, awesome construction). You can explore different components - for example, I don't think you've ever cut apart an Itshide sole or a CF Stead leather. You mentioned in the Grant Stone video that they are the best value boots, but it's hard to say that when you haven't really compared with anything else in the same tier!
They aren’t throwing money at him like GS is
Provided they dont change any of the existing boots (iron ranger, moc toe) I think its fine myself.
Honestly, I don't mind it on a Chelsea. I was the midsole to last about as long as the elastic on the upper. Don't need any more than that.
I’ve worn a pair of Red Wong Ashby Moc Toes throughout the entirety of my adult working career (which is really only about 5 years 😆) and i love them. Recently got a pair of the classic mocs and also really love them. Break In period is a
B-Word but i love them nonetheless and i can feel the comfort really coming in. I really love the only ways of doing things especially with boots and people should tru and break in a leather insole at least once in their lives.
With that being said, i love the idea that Red Wing is making heritage boots with a few tweaked alterations to give an alternative to those who want a nicer made boot but are afraid to or don’t know how yo properly break in a boot. I personally really want to try a pair if Iron Rangers with the traction Sole.
There’s nothing wrong with expanding to get more people into boots. Peeps needs to stop gatekeeping the boot world.
I’d be curious for a comparison between the Danner Bull Run Chelsea the RW and a Blundstone….?
I like the new RW Chelsea. In fact, I'd be inclined to buy it if I hadn't already purchased the Work Chukka last year.
Have you reviewed the Vasque Sundowners? That was my go-to boot for the 90's and early 2000's.
Here's a vote for the comparison with Blundstone, I'd wager this new RW chelsea with superior materials and out-of-the-box comfort would be better value. As long as they maintain the original heritage line I'm fine with this shift. Sometimes you just need a boot that works straightaway without spending the time on a lengthy break in. Everything else is made to the high standards of Red Wing and I'd bet that when eventually getting these resoled you could request a full leather footbed.