The Power Paradox: The Promise and Peril of 21st Century Power | Dacher Keltner | Talks at Google
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2016
- For the past 20 years Dacher Keltner has studied human emotion, power, and the structure of human social life. Building upon hundreds of scientific findings, his work as a scientific consultant on Pixar's film "Inside Out", and work to improve the criminal justice system, this talk will detail five basic principles about human power that he captures in his new book, "The Power Paradox: How We Gain and Lose Influence." These ideas will answer timeless questions such as how we get power and why it so often unleashes sociopathic tendencies, and how power is dramatically changing in this 21st century (thanks in part to entities like Google). He will point to a future of more positive power, and ways to remedy the ills of power, such as inequality.
Dacher Keltner, you are awesome!!
Another good book on this topic is Sir Michael Marmot's 'Status Syndrome'.
“The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling
ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is
at the same time its ruling intellectual force. The class which has the
means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same
time over the means of mental production, so that thereby, generally
speaking, the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production are
subject to it. The ruling ideas are nothing more than the ideal
expression of the dominant material relationships, the dominant material
relationships grasped as ideas.”
―
Karl Marx
Figuring people out... that's a real challenge, I can't even put together who I was last 10 years ago
If you want figure out people, watch Robert Sapolsky videos.
You can also look up Big 5 personality model and spiral dynamics.
It is interesting that question that tried to bring it back to the powerless finding an individual solution to a social and political problem. It’s the sort of thing that is non-threatening to the privileged at Google and in the audience of TED talks.
32nd-33rd minute is 🔥 because it’s based on science
During the Q&A, the questioner assumed the person of power was more likely to speed because the deterrent of paying the fine was insignificant. It is true that the fine is insignificant. Not only must the fine be perceived by the power person, but the chances of being being stopped while speeding must also be perceive as very high
Right, or of seeing a rainbow of traffic violation tickets for using GPS Joystick (&&FastPass) while jogging; ranging from driving a half mile above the road to switching highways with interchanges 30 miles apart 9 times a minute. I have to go visit my city's Bogon Fuzzing Department for that, right?
Child Frailty Syndrome at 3:00 doesn't seem to be a thing, from searching! Names for not taking care and getting The Troubles got other names.
Not selling better as 'The Capabilities Paradox.'
12:00 ish...soft essayist power props. 18:00 Machiavelli revue and 'collaborative protest' reprise belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3301_pp007-044_Stephan_Chenoweth.pdf. And his own rady.ucsd.edu/docs/Virtues_ten%20Brinke%20Liu%20Keltner%20and%20Srivastava%202015.pdf (plus this book, and I guess I can just leave theartofcharm.com/podcast-episodes/dacher-keltner-the-power-paradox-episode-538/ here...nice venue and not the last podcast he'll be on this year.)
Laughing at others' struggle is their tell for Machivellians, not that you're well read and/or old and appreciate comedy? Feh!.
Mentions frowny duckface as tell of self-love 20:45 or so.
30:00 ish; basketball is nonviolent because of expectation of touch.
35:00 ish; pedestrian daring traffic in crosswalk, scores car closest to them...Prius people hypermile right up to your butt as expected, not about BS aversion (not cross-scored.)
41:35 ; paradox stated slide 42:39 next; the 25% of US kids eligible for these troubles
47:13 www.dphu.org/uploads/attachements/books/books_926_0.pdf and Miller & Chen have an ongoing series, incl. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766848/ (cites 2009 bits mentioning Metabolic Syndrome.)
49:00 Q&A nopesauce, minding Dacher of: Michelle Alexander _The New Jim Crow_ Brian Stephenson's _Just Mercy_ have power and class bias to call and healthcare frequent fliers to remedy. Soft intervention v. powerlessness are getting outdoors, mindfulness. 55:00 ish; when you're on top, it's hard to find egalitarian culture (or not be deprived of gaming happiness of it.)
Power causes people to lose empathy, this is not surprising at at all.
It wouldn't be controversial to also hypothesize that a lack of empathy enables people to gain power.
When you listen to someone for full 6 minutes... and you find nothing impressive... its time to cut the video short and move on...
Is there anyone I can speak to get those 6 min of my life back?
His research is so bad. Looks like nothing he does would survive the Replication Crisis.