Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
- "Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible? Why can't Christians agree on the Bible?"
Dr. Robert Plummer answers in Honest Answers | Episode 33
Watch more episodes of Honest Answers here:
• How do you do family w...
To find out the answer to next week's question, don't forget to SUBSCRIBE:
www.youtube.com...
Ask any questions about theology, ministry, or life; and have them answered honestly by Southern Seminary professors.
Submit your questions by:
Email: honestanswers@sbts.edu
Twitter: @askHonestAns
or post them in the comments below
To learn more about studying with a Southern Seminary Professor, go to www.sbts.edu
This guy did a great job answering this question. Gave different reasons why people may interpret scripture than others and gave scripture to encourage people in seeking God for answers in their life. For any of you saying he didn’t answer this well or he side stepped the question, you obviously need to open your ears and listen to/watch this video again. Great job Southern Seminary!
This didn't answer anything
Quran is the answer . No versions , the last and final testament.
If its against your personal agenda people find a way to change it.
Cotrect, that is why they tech lawlessness
The same can be said of Christianity.
He never answered the question in the TH-cam title about bible versions. Frustrating.
Chris Cravens The video is about interpretations of the Bible, not translations of the extant manuscripts in their original languages.
Because we're human and we think differently.
"Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?" Deceptive answers.
So deceptive snakes like this man can deceive you away from God's word.
King James, Geneva, Bishop's, Tyndale.... there are many non-Gnostic Bibles available.
That's what I thought so too...strange.
@@canadiankewldude the one that God ordained, blessed, and used above all is the King James Bible, also called the Authorized Book because it was authorized by a King, and where the word of a king is, there is power
I listened to the full video and Im being honest. This speaker did not give a straight answer. I understand sometimes it's necessary to give a parable but the verse in Romans has no relevance to the question. Furthermore sugar coating the answer with "God will help you!" Is not helpful as this is not a error from God's end but rather the Christians for not preserving their book in the text (so the language in which) it was revealed in. The message can be lost in translation especially if it's more than one language.
It's no wonder if someone approaches the Bible with the presupposition that it is the word of God that they come to the conclusion it is the word of God. [Just using his argument back on him.]
😉😂
Somehow I would like to talk with him confidentially under 4 eyes.....
And confront him in THAT setting with what I KNOW, WHY I know it and what he REALLY has to say about that because he will only in such a confidential setting ever be real with me, here he will always remain within the bandwith of official Southern Seminary Doctrines which honestly don't interest me.....Too much at risk so to say as that he could afford to be real but may be in such a setting it could work.....just my intuition...
He shared some very helpful insights!
There are unintentional contradictions, especially in English translations.
Proof, is, Christianity is not under one roof. I have noticed, the contradictions, are between persons, not the basic love letter.
The REASON for many MISINTERPRETATIONS is because MANY have superimposed their OWN limited finite thinking onto God's PERFECT word. CHRISTIANITY is NO an exercise in intellectual development. That is a fundamental mistake.1 Corinthians 2:12-14 (RSV)12 Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is from God, that we might understand the gifts bestowed on us by God. 13 And we impart this in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual truths to those who possess the Spirit.[a]14 The unspiritual[b] man does not receive the gifts of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
I’m concerned with how many Christians view the Bible through the lens of science. It’s amazing how much things in science contradict the Bible, depending of course on your interpretation. But let’s be honest there is only one interpretation of the Bible, the way God intended it to be understood. The earth cannot be millions of years old and thousands at the same time.. please Christians, don’t let the world change your perspective on what’s clearly revealed in Scripture. View everything through the lens of Scripture and if it doesn’t agree then dig deep to understand why!!
Okay people, so think about it for a second instead of harsh judgment. Clearly he did answer the question that was GIVEN to him. His question he was answering is “why cant Christians agree on the Bible?”. BUT he did also did answer the question. He isnt talking about interpretation/translations like a Bible translation. But instead on interpretation of difficult texts (hermeneutics)
Just keep telling yourself that. Lol.
Awesome! Love it. Thank you!
Tony Campolo and colleagues settle on Red Letter scripture, wisdom falling from lips of Christ. Apostle Paul, charismatic leader, Roman citizen, expert lawyer tried to reconcile why he, wretched sinner, zealous persecutor of Christians, received so much grace, filled with Holy Spirit could work wonders, The expert Pharisee argued long and hard and well. but his " works-faith " definition in Ronans 3.28 was so misinterpreted it led to the crescendo of challenges and scores of denominations, some sporting Swastikas, many think that is a good thing, Apostle Peter would lament at the misinterpretation.
Why believe in the Bible at all unless you believe in the Catholic Church? Don't you know that it was the Catholic Church put the Bible together in the first place, at the Council of Hippo in 393 a.d.?
The Bible is utterly incomprehensible without the teaching authority of the Catholic Church.
They also tried to hide its truth from the illiterate masses
Why aren't your videos playing on my Apple TV TH-cam app?
@my work from my phone, you cannot comment on videos from Apple TV
It’s NO rocket science sir… As long as pastors, evangelists, teachers, etc., ad nausea, are TAUGHT by men in cemeteries… ehrr, excuse me, seminaries, you will NEVER have unity about ANYTHING but only DIVISION.
UNTIL all of YOU put aside egos and visions of grandeur of your “ministries”, you are working in VAIN (Psalm 127:1) and as long as you are NOT submitting to the teachings and leading of His Spirit (John 16:13; Zech. 4:6) you will experience Hosea 4:6 in your lives.
Period, end of story.
Were the answers really that honest !!? For example when did Jesus teach "us" about asking for a fish etc. ? What I mean is that Jesus was ministering to the circumcision exclusively during his earthly ministry(other than a small amount of exceptions maybe) .. eg the woman who kept barracking him and finally, having ignored her m explained to her that it wasn't meet to give the chidrens bread to the dogs !!! Would it be true that if a mon gentile like myself and this gentleman on the vide could time warp and be in his audience we would have been "dogs" ... and he wasn't going to address us at all !!! Therefore how come then, that the claim is that Jesus taught "us" about the fish etc etc. !!?
But what is God?
3:50 Former Christian here. This is a pretty fair question. However, the reality is that most people are not going to be Bible scholars. I am no scholar myself, but I did what I could for several years. I am still not convinced that the Bible is the inerrant and complete Word of God. I am however convinced that it was written by human beings. Sure, we can draw inspiration from some parts of it. But it remains a collection of man-made documents. I don't think you necessarily need the Bible to find God or decency. Of course, I know that this is nothing but satanic blasphemy by evangelical standards.
Nah it’s jus your not understanding bro.yea the Bible was written by man but u also gotta understand is it’s still Gods word.Wat did Jesus say everytime he was confronted by the Pharisees and Satan?he always started off with saying”it is written “quoting scripture from the Old Testament.Jesus didn’t also come to die and make a way.but to come and set a example as well my friend
2:44 God is a loving Father, Amen!! That is why he gave us a Church which is the pillar and bulwark of truth which can guide us into all Truth. When you turn away from the Church, that God himself established, you can interpret the Bible any way you want and by what authority do you have to say they are wrong?
Which Church?
@@ineedoff1 The Church which can trace its roots to the original Apostles.
Most modern evangelical Christians force the scripture to fit into one of two man-made systems of interpretation.
Reformed Covenant Theology is about 400 years old, and Dispensational Theology is less than 200 years old.
Southern Seminary now uses the first of the above.
The 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith claims the ten commandments were given to Adam in the garden, even though Paul says in Galatians 3:16-29 the law was "added" 430 years "after" the promise was made to Abraham "until" the seed (Christ) could come to whom the promise was made.
Who would Adam have committed adultery with, since Eve was the only woman alive? How could Adam honor his mother, since he had none?
The confession also claims we are still under the 4th commandment, even though Paul says otherwise in Colossians 2:16-17. You cannot keep the Sinai sabbath on the wrong day of the week, at the wrong time of day, by doing only some work. Christ is our Sabbath rest every day of the week.
Much of this confusion comes from an ignorance, or denial, of the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34.
.
The New Covenant: Bob George
th-cam.com/video/Rj7NQffg_NE/w-d-xo.html
.
No fact is is I have looked up so many verses and it did not say what was claimed explain to me so many holy bibles and verses should be word for word in each one excuses do not make something right
Justification of the teaching Magisterium of the Catholic Church which has the advantage of over 2000 years experience in interpreting the Bible which, in turn, She codified in 382. Jesus founded His Church in 382
The God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob only authored ONE Holy Written Word - just one. And in that Word He warns us about adding to - and taking from - His Word. But mankind being mankind - secular, sinful and full of pride - decided that we could word His Word better than He - so we started writing all of these "versions" we have now in the bookstores and libraries. Are those (versions) His true Living Holy Word? No. They are written by mankind - and those who have written them will be destroyed - according to God. .
.
Get yourself a King James 1611 Authorized - the only one that has been around for over 400 years - the only one that men/women/children were tortured, beheaded and burned at the stake for owning - and reading from. If you do a little research into the "dark ages" and the "crusades" you will learn that it was the Rcc (roman catholic so called "church") that committed this horrific atrocities - in their attempt to destroy God's Word. They failed - because God promises us He will preserve His Word for all generations - and He has - therefore the Rcc failed in their attempts - and will always fail - because they are trying to do battle against God Himself. . Also - do some research into just what all these "versions" have removed from God's Holy Word - - it will shock you, I promise. The NIV alone removes over 66,000 words, names and even entire verses - including the word 'sodomite'. A good website to compare the "versions" to the KJ 1611 is: www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/1611_authorized_king_james.htm .
.
Also - worth nothing - the King James 1611 text is the only text that carries no copyright - never has - never will. . The NIV, ESV, NKJV, NWT, etc - cannot claim the same. . Another red flag - which book is the one book that is most widely attacked - - the King James 1611. That's because satan only goes after God's Word - and even he knows which one is God's Word.
People honestly don't have to add or take away anything. Theres just a lot in Scripture that can be interpreted a number of ways, countless even. The reason there are so many different interpretations is due to it all being simply subjective.
@@pengmaeda9908 "Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?" Deceptive answers.
So deceptive snakes like this man can deceive you away from God's word.
King James, Geneva, Bishop's, Tyndale.... there are many non-Gnostic Bibles available.
You're amusing. The modern gutenberg bibles still exist and predate protestism. The duey reimes English bible predate Henry 8ths creation of protestantism. There are truly ancient bibles in Coptic, Latin and Greek. Btw how did the Catholics slaughter the post reformation Brits given that Henry and his heirs slaughtered the priests and believers who refused to convert to Henry's church, stole their property, and drove them to near extinction?
There are thousands of denominations just in christianity alone , each with a different doctrine. Each interpret gods rules and words differently. And each thinks the other denominations have got it wrong that only they have it right.
They even disagree on things amongst the same church and congregation. So then for the religious it comes down to which objective version of god you hold as true IN YOUR OPINION.
THAT MAKES IT ONLY AN OPINION NOTHING MORE.
My opinion is that I could do a better job of authoring a moral system with just 5 mins to improve the bible watch.
DONT OWN PEOPLE-------
YOU CANT BEAT THEM FULLSTOP--------
WOMEN ARE YOUR EQUAL AND HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS MEN.------'
THERE REALLY AREN'T ANY WITCHES SO YOU DONT NEED TO BURN ANY GIRLS TO DEATH.
OH AND BY THE WAY THERE'S SOMETHING CALLED GERMS SO WASH YOUR HANDS PROPERLY.
IM NOT A NARSOCHIST SO DONT WORSHIP ME. COS ANY GOD THAT REQUIRES WORSHIP IS NOT WOTHY OF WORSHIP.
AND I THINK I WILL TREAT ALL TRIBES EQUALY , SO FORGET THAT FAVOURITE RACE GARBAGE.
OH AND THAT PIECE OF SKIN ON THE END OF YOUR PENIS IS THERE FOR A REASON .😜
Boom how easy was that only took 5 mins ,much better now. Something tells me that the bible wasn't actually authored by an omnipotent moral god. But just ignorant medevil superstitious peasants who knew no better. And that's why it looks exactly like all the other fables of gods and demi gods, from that period who required the smell of burning flesh or else !!!
Well put, my friend. 👍
I agree!!!
Nice!
Who said god wasn't real you said that you cant put words in our mouth the question again is why do churches teach the bible differently when it say no man shall add to or take away from the word please answer and no smoke screens in your own words and your answer seems like a smoke screen
Because Martin Luther revolted and many heresys and interpretations and churches have risen up and follow wolves. Catholicism has kept the same interpretation for over 2000 years just as the church fathers and Jesus meant for his one Church to be. There is no confusion in our interpretations.
Roseanne F Mein Kampf quotes Martin Luther
AMEN!
I agree
He was in a bad mood one day a took 7 books out the bible that makes me think the books is all fake if it was the the work of God there should be only one version it cn not be tamppered with it if is that sacred
Joanne Chisholm the added books weren't inspired as scripture , God has not meant that there be confusion
it is the same in every discipline.....maybe incomplete information...maybe wishful thinking, but it is....par, for the course....
Because we all accept god’s grace at different levels. Most are only willing to be barley saved and won’t accept any holiness a few go on to to receive the Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in tongue’s and a select few accept all of the great grace of god and go on to perfection.
The Bible is open to interpretation but, the constitution is not?
OK, so how many bible versions u have from Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Mormon etc?? In contrast to Islam, there is only 1 version in this world.
For knowledge purpose only, not demeaning any religion...
There are huge differences in interpretations: role of baptism, should you baptise a baby or not, can you lose your salvation if sinning or not and so on! There are 35 000 protestant denominations with all sorts of different Bible interpretations, all of them believe they have the right answer. Do you really think God left us here in a big confusion about what He wanted to tell us? Obviously not.There is one universal (universal=catholic) Holy Mother Church that holds the keys as Jesus wanted: Timothy 3:15 : "This is the church of the living God, which is the pillar and foundation of the truth" God Bless
Exactly, in more simpler terms its because of sola scriptura. Thats why there are so many different interpretation of Holy Scriptures.
You won't find one place in the Bible that teaches infant baptism. Those who do so, don't get it from the Bible.
Sinful nature cause disagreements
"Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?" Deceptive answers.
So deceptive snakes like this man can deceive you away from God's word.
King James, Geneva, Bishop's, Tyndale.... there are many non-Gnostic Bibles available.
There is only one reason why christians and so called christians to agree with the scriptures in the bible, because some want to interpret the bible on what they think it says not what is written, that's interpreting the bible in the flesh and the bible must be understood spiritually, 1 Corinthians 2:14
Because Satan is trying to confound the believers. :) Or perhaps because the Bible is not unambiguous.
"Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?"
For many years I wondered why this was; but I never got a plausible answer anywhere. That all changed when I reached 75 (89 now).
It happened BECAUSE I sincerely prayed my heart out to Jesus; asking WHY there are so MANY diabolically different beliefs all over the world; when it comes to interpretations of the bible(s).
Within days, I began learning things I had never learned in the previous 70 yrs of my life. Oh indeed I did. Praise Jesus! And it hasn't stopped yet! Wow! How I love Jesus with "all my heart, soul and mind"!
Warning: In all likelihood, You're NOT "gunna" like this; but I believe it IS true. I believe that the Holy Spirit guided me to realize that ALL bibles are filled with errors. Oh indeed yes. I would have never believed that; If I hadn't took it to Jesus!. Thus, I stand on it; as I stand on this planet. I don't care if the entire world goes against me I will stand on it. However...
...I am NOT going to throw my bibles in the garbage can; BECAUSE there are untold "golden" truths throughout the bible(s) ALSO!. Oh indeed yes. I believe the Holy Spirit guided me to know this too. And THIS answered my question to the "nth" degree. Praise His Holy Name.
Here are just a few "errors" (but there are a myriad number of errors more)...
...Compare Deuteronomy 24:1 vs Mathew 19:3-9. And compare Mathew 1:1 vs Mathew 22:41-45 and John 8:58. Also compare James 2:26 vs Ephesians 2:8 and 9. Also, compare Mark 3:28 and 29 vs Hebrews 10:26. And I could go on and on and on; where there ARE bold contradictions and right out lies. Please read...
...2nd Timothy 3:16 is NOT true. Oh yes indeed. The above proves that to any wise person. I love Paul and MUCH of what he wrote is absolute truth. But he wrote errors also. Oh indeed he did.
Thus: I believe this happened because satan inspired ALL the writers to put in errors; while Jesus was inspiring the truths. And I believe that Jesus let him do that; so that we would NOT worship the bible; rather worship Him. Oh yes!
Now if you are mad at me now; hear this:
NO bible is the "word of God". I believe that Jesus is the ONLY "word" of God there will ever have been. Please read this...
...John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with(in) God, and the Word was God. John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Now SHOW me a single bible that has ever been; that became "flesh"! Huh? I rest my case.
Could I be wrong? ABSOLUTELY yes! But this applies to all others who must bare the same.
In any case, Praise Jesus; for He is the ONLY true God there will ever have been. AMEN!
Amen! And also Revelation 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
HOW in the world can anyone read that verse and say it's talking about a "book"? LOL
Ask not what God can do for you.
Ask what you can do for God.
It's total confusion in the churches How can a coherent interpretation be made from thousands of years old texts, often poorly translated.
Repent , why isn't the definition in the back or the bible , It can't be found in biblical dictionary . Google and you tube research only led me to discover it has bean debated for thousands of years .WHY?
This video was an embarrassment. The speaker provided no explanations, only excuses. He shed no light on, for example, Catholic vs. Protestant interpretations of justification, or Calvinist vs. Arminian interpretations of predestination. I was looking for something more specific.
Eric Hodge
Very true, he never gave a genuine answer.
Ill give u a straight answer because it all fake there books has been tammped with soo may times they have lost in translation
"Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?" Deceptive answers.
So deceptive snakes like this man can deceive you away from God's word.
King James, Geneva, Bishop's, Tyndale.... there are many non-Gnostic Bibles available.
The biggest problem with Christianity is not enough of going in your room lock the door and get on your knees, open your heart , turn all your attention to God. To much of going to men for answers, TH-cam. GO TO GOD!!!!!!!!
@R Treadwell Bibles come from two main streams, the majority text and the critical text.
The critical text is deceptive.
Click bait
"Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?"
God must have mumbled.
C Nault
People have so many different understandings and interpretations of what they believe in the Bible. Some love the Bible and some hate the Bible. Even so, it is still fulfilling the Lord’s statement-“And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me”(John 12:32).
@@paeng46 "Some love the Bible and some hate the Bible."
Those aren't the only choices.Some people dismiss the Bible as nonsense or fable.
"Even so, it is still fulfilling the Lord’s statement-“And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me”"
Two claims there, both unproven.
Can you prove this "lord" said that?
Can you prove he was lifted up from the earth?
C Nault
I cannot prove that the Lord was lifted up or even had said that he was lifted up. It is the apostle John who said that the Lord said that he was lifted up. The apostle said in his writing-“This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things”. And I believe the same in what he said. I cannot prove that the Lord has said that statement you are asking me, and neither can I prove that he was lifted up using the text of John 12:32; but just as John said “and we know that his (John) testimony is true”(v.24), so I believed the same. It all began with believing in Genesis 1:1.
@@paeng46 "It is the apostle John who said that the Lord said that he was lifted up. The apostle said in his writing"
How do you know he wrote that?
"just as John said “and we know that his (John) testimony is true”"
How do you know his testimony is true? To know it is true, you would have to prove it happened. Can you prove it happened?
C Nault
No, I cannot prove it happened. But that doesn’t mean you cannot believe it’s true. That doesn’t prove it’s false either; when you cannot prove something happened.
I don't like what he's saying or the way he believes.
Because the Bible is a LIVING Word of God. It is God communicating with His children. And we are all different. We will have different convictions and so interpret according to the Holy Spirit in us. But yes, the fundamentals of God and Salvation will be the same.
the bible is a living word of corruptors of faith from pagan europe
WOW! Yeah no
🤔 the Bible has no authority.
Growing up in a civil war made me realize there is a God, and is not necessarily good.
Because of the Reformation and introduction of Sola scriptura
There are hundreds of variant versions of Christian Bibles none match each other or the original koine Greek NT Papyrus or the Hebrew Tanakh Bible or Dead sea scrolls....
There is 35,000 different Christian sects today. Bizarre
Lol. You talk as if oh got it all figured out. “None match the original koine Greek by papyrus or the Hebrew Tanakh Bible.” You don’t know that. And it’s best to look into these things rather than just plead ignorance like you atheists do. This is you eternity on the line and you would rather stay ignorant. Bizarre.
35,000 denominations but only One True Church, the Catholic Church.
George Penton Eight crusades Inquisitions pogroms Afrikan slavery genocide forced conversions and Holocaust child abuse......?
Study Hebrew
red why?
I agree
Why doesn't someone just ask Jesus Christ which is the correct interpretation? Because he tells different people different things.
Quran is the answer .. the last and final testament. No versions !
I’d like to see him and brother polite sit down and build. Polite would tear this guy up lol.
This is cringe
Because its all fake
There is no god But only ONE. JESUS IS PROPHET OF GOD LIKE ADAM ,,DAVID,,SOLOMAN MANY PROPHETS
Surat No 4 : سورة النساء - Ayat No 157
وَّ قَوۡلِہِمۡ اِنَّا قَتَلۡنَا الۡمَسِیۡحَ عِیۡسَی ابۡنَ مَرۡیَمَ رَسُوۡلَ اللّٰہِ ۚ وَ مَا قَتَلُوۡہُ وَ مَا صَلَبُوۡہُ وَ لٰکِنۡ شُبِّہَ لَہُمۡ ؕ وَ اِنَّ الَّذِیۡنَ اخۡتَلَفُوۡا فِیۡہِ لَفِیۡ شَکٍّ مِّنۡہُ ؕ مَا لَہُمۡ بِہٖ مِنۡ عِلۡمٍ اِلَّا اتِّبَاعَ الظَّنِّ ۚ وَ مَا قَتَلُوۡہُ یَقِیۡنًۢا ﴿۱۵۷﴾ۙ
And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah ." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.
Surat No 3 : سورة آل عمران - Ayat No 55
اِذۡ قَالَ اللّٰہُ یٰعِیۡسٰۤی اِنِّیۡ مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ وَ رَافِعُکَ اِلَیَّ وَ مُطَہِّرُکَ مِنَ الَّذِیۡنَ کَفَرُوۡا وَ جَاعِلُ الَّذِیۡنَ اتَّبَعُوۡکَ فَوۡقَ الَّذِیۡنَ کَفَرُوۡۤا اِلٰی یَوۡمِ الۡقِیٰمَۃِ ۚ ثُمَّ اِلَیَّ مَرۡجِعُکُمۡ فَاَحۡکُمُ بَیۡنَکُمۡ فِیۡمَا کُنۡتُمۡ فِیۡہِ تَخۡتَلِفُوۡنَ ﴿۵۵﴾
[Mention] when Allah said, "O Jesus, indeed I will take you and raise you to Myself and purify you from those who disbelieve and make those who follow you [in submission to Allah alone] superior to those who disbelieve until the Day of Resurrection. Then to Me is your return, and I will judge between you concerning that in which you used to
JESUS IS NOT DEAD_AL_QURAN_THE_BOOK OF_ONE_GOD_ALLAH
The Bible is not the word of God
There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his servant and messenger and I add that Jesus is his prophet.
Foh
Coz Humans have corrupted previous Books sent by God. "There r more mistakes in Bible than there r words in it" Bart Erhman. All mankind shud follow final revelation of God Holy Qur'an.
Holy Qur'an confirms Miraculous birth of Jesus Christ peace b upon him, he gave life to dead by permission of God.
can you tell me what the qurans eqivelent to john 3:16 please?
@@CoxysHobbiesJESUSLOVESYOU "It is not [befitting] for Allah to take a son; exalted is He! When He decrees an affair, He only says to it, "Be," and it is." Noble Qur'an 19.35
John 3.16 contradicts with Nature of God mentioned in Bible itself. God is Not Loving n Unjust as per Corrupted Text of Bible God ORDER "TO KILL WOMEN, CHILDREN, INFANTS, horses etc" 1 Samuel 15:3 Bible has Sons by tonns including Begotten.
Allah informed mankind that previous books were only for Particular group of ppl and have been corrupted by Humans. So whatever in Bible matches with Qur'an is actual word of God what doesn't match and goes against Qur'an it means its corrupted by Scribes.
Virgin births are standard fare with the ancients to people believed to be demigods. It's not believable and it doesn't happen. But if you do believe it, why not believe in Hercules as well...he had a virgin birth too
There are huge differences between mythological characters who lived "once upon a time" (ie, they never really existed) and a known historical figure like Jesus. The miraculous birth stories of the former bear only superficial similarities to the accounts in Matthew and Luke of Jesus' conception and birth.
Of course there are huge differences. they come from different cultures. that is not my point. Numerous stories from different cultures have virgin birth demigods. Its standard fare if you want to pass off a god-man story. its still not believable. Oh, and its debatable whether jesus was a real historical figure.
Only lunatic-fringe atheist pseudo-historians question the existence of Jesus. All reputable historians of the ancient world acknowledge that Jesus was a real person, and that the Gospels are accurate accounts of His life and ministry (some historians question some of the details, but all agree that in the first half of the 1st century AD a man named Jesus of Nazareth was a major religious figure in Palestine, and that he got himself executed by the Romans on trumped-up charges, and that his followers, shortly after his death, began proclaiming that he had risen from the dead, and that the group [which came to be called Christians] of those who believed this spread within a few generations, to all part of the Roman Empire, and beyond).
Greg B True the vast majority of historians don't question the historical existence of Jesus. Whether the arguments for the Christ-myth theory will continue to gain traction among scholars and historians, only time will tell. Some tenured professors are open to the idea on a mythic Jesus. Nevertheless, even if an actual Jesus of Nazareth did exist, he is highly unlikely to be the Jesus of the gospels, meaning the gospel accounts are hardly believable and not written by eyewitnesses, and even biblical scholars can't agree on the time frame in which they were written.
On what rational grounds do you say that the Jesus of history and the Jesus of the Gospels are not one and the same? What is your evidence? All you've got is the opinions of some anti-Christian "scholars" (who because of their bias can make no claims to objectivity).
"Why are there so many interpretations of the Bible?" Deceptive answers.
So deceptive snakes like this man can deceive you away from God's word.
King James, Geneva, Bishop's, Tyndale.... there are many non-Gnostic Bibles available.