I m Sorry fpr myne english in First 😱 I try tuo explain now: The Roger Moore was of myne generation. And, I was a fan of Moore. But....when I saw the Bond serie, (at 12/12 Age!) for me, was completely ridiculous. please, unsurreally. The villan, the gadget, the formula Is so simple. No strong passion in sens about danger and fear...other example, he kills without even messing up his hair ???🙄 Now in few words...do you Remember some film of that era? Fil as Apocalipse now? For me a real big opera. The kind of actor and formula of the Bond film Is too mutch artificial and obvious. 😏 Probally, for me, Is the same for people from a many countryes. And, the tipical artificiale face of the Heroes Is artificial. I mean, the old formula Is as about a "cute boy" and dresses Nothing memorable. So, have to decide of Is good idea to continue with nostalgia or hunderstend our periodo ,and the business over all. Talent as Craig are rarely but you have. 😇 Thank you for youre attention e for the patient with myne english. 🥵🥵🥵
@@rosannamazzola5066 No problem. I understand your ideas clearly. I am of the same generation. Moore was the Bond when I was a boy. Maybe my age at that time was the target audience. The formula is simple, Bond always wins, and his hair is alwats perfect! It is true! When I became older, serious films slowly became easy to understand. Bond had no consequences, he always won. That is why "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" is so special. His wife died, last scene. Thank you again for sharing your opinions. 😁
True, but there are Bond girls and there is "the girl". By formula, there is one girl that is the main romantic interest for Bond, and he almost always winds up with her in the final scene. Camille was a Bond girl in that she was in a Bond film, but so was Strawberry Fields...and Bond did more than kiss that one. 😉
Genius!!!!! All correct 👍👍👍👍 Per molti di noi italiani Bond era un cartoons!!! Boring , really very very boring
Thank you for the comment. It is interesting to hear a perspective from another culture. I am happy that you liked my analysis! 😁
I m Sorry fpr myne english in First 😱 I try tuo explain now: The Roger Moore was of myne generation. And, I was a fan of Moore. But....when I saw the Bond serie, (at 12/12 Age!) for me, was completely ridiculous. please, unsurreally. The villan, the gadget, the formula Is so simple. No strong passion in sens about danger and fear...other example, he kills without even messing up his hair ???🙄 Now in few words...do you Remember some film of that era? Fil as Apocalipse now? For me a real big opera. The kind of actor and formula of the Bond film Is too mutch artificial and obvious. 😏 Probally, for me, Is the same for people from a many countryes. And, the tipical artificiale face of the Heroes Is artificial. I mean, the old formula Is as about a "cute boy" and dresses Nothing memorable. So, have to decide of Is good idea to continue with nostalgia or hunderstend our periodo ,and the business over all. Talent as Craig are rarely but you have. 😇 Thank you for youre attention e for the patient with myne english. 🥵🥵🥵
@@rosannamazzola5066 No problem. I understand your ideas clearly. I am of the same generation. Moore was the Bond when I was a boy. Maybe my age at that time was the target audience. The formula is simple, Bond always wins, and his hair is alwats perfect! It is true! When I became older, serious films slowly became easy to understand. Bond had no consequences, he always won. That is why "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" is so special. His wife died, last scene. Thank you again for sharing your opinions. 😁
Technically Camille is a Bond girl in Quantum, Bond even ends up kissing her!
True, but there are Bond girls and there is "the girl". By formula, there is one girl that is the main romantic interest for Bond, and he almost always winds up with her in the final scene. Camille was a Bond girl in that she was in a Bond film, but so was Strawberry Fields...and Bond did more than kiss that one. 😉