after watching this video I've successfully solved 18 GATE questions related to this topic. Superb explanation and tips also make very big difference. Thank You, Hats Off !!
This is the most clear explanation I've had for FOL. I've never seen anyone break the universal/existential quantification. It was very helpful when you did that.
i wasted a two hour lecture at the university for this topic understanding nothing and in just 52 mins you made me understand everything \ thanks a lot sir
This is the best lecture of FOL for me till now and u make us understand the basics which is the most imp thing .for any topic to understand thoroughly, Thanks alot
A great beginning. Very meaningful introduction to a new topic. Conclusions of shortfalls of older techniques for higher level of discussion leading to a newer dimension of understanding! What a smooth sailing from one topic to the next 👏 👌. Hats off to you Sir. Checked many books and lectures but none were found to clarify the concepts 💡 to the root. Thanks for guiding open heartedly. A noble mission. God bless you 🙏
Thank you so much for your time and contribution. This video is extremely illuminating. However, I have a little advice on watching your video lesson about "propositional logic basics" first and then watching this video. Because students can find the truth value table in the propositional logic basics' video. Otherwise, it may be a bit difficult to understand why false and false makes false, why true implies false makes false and so on. because they are just rules which we cannot question and prove as you said. All in all, Thank you so much!!!!!
My sincere apologies to vaani raju rani pinky bunny who are watching these videos 😉 but at the same time I want to thank you all for making this difficult concept so easy
what if the premises contained contradiction? for example, (V implies L), ( L implies B), (M implies -B), (V and M). one could derive (B and M), simplify B out of (B and M). Add R to B. proceed to derive -B, by disjunctive syllogism I have R which is not related to the premise.
Sir at 19:00 you wrote For all x(Lion(x)->coffee(x)) What if animal is not a lion Then also lion(x)->coffee(x) is true Which is invalid???? Please reply and clear
This is the most useful FOL lecture I have ever received. Thanks to you Professor. Especially, for clearing my doubt at 22:24
Thank you Vaibhav
Vaibhav Kotwal i also had the same doubt always
cant the answer be -- for all x, cat(x) -> there exists Intelligent(cat)? Please help
I have also same doubt but now it is cleared
@@utsavprabhakar5072 Question is of Some cats not All cats
after watching this video I've successfully solved 18 GATE questions related to this topic. Superb explanation and tips also make very big difference. Thank You, Hats Off !!
such clarity on the concept is highly appreciable .
I was struggling with FOL for last 2 days , then i had founded this video .
I can't thank you enough. I just fell in love with your teaching approach. fantastico. Thanks a lot
This is the most clear explanation I've had for FOL.
I've never seen anyone break the universal/existential quantification. It was very helpful when you did that.
That's the most helpful video I have found about FOL. Thank you for making this video, it's been super helpful.
I can't thank you enough. Best lecture about FOL on youtube.
This has brilliantly been drilled into my system. Kudos for an amazing session!
i wasted a two hour lecture at the university for this topic understanding nothing and in just 52 mins you made me understand everything \
thanks a lot sir
I am now in love with this topic earlier than watching this video lecture i used to hate this concept.
You are just genius.
❤❤❤❤❤
Ever since I started discrete math no one explained propositional logic like this man
Best explanation on this topic ever seen..simply GREAT!!!!
What an amazing explanation. THANKS A LOT FOR SHARING THIS WITH US. Keep doing this great work.
the way u talk is sooo polite and humble.
This is the best lecture of FOL for me till now and u make us understand the basics which is the most imp thing .for any topic to understand thoroughly, Thanks alot
Great explanation starting from first principles. It makes it so easy to apply FOL to statements. Thank you.
Thank you so freaking much! Explained so well !
A great beginning. Very meaningful introduction to a new topic. Conclusions of shortfalls of older techniques for higher level of discussion leading to a newer dimension of understanding! What a smooth sailing from one topic to the next 👏 👌. Hats off to you Sir. Checked many books and lectures but none were found to clarify the concepts 💡 to the root. Thanks for guiding open heartedly. A noble mission. God bless you 🙏
This is freaking perfect. Thanks a lot!
Thanks soooooo much bro, u saved my final exam anyway
My prof recommended this video to us and it was really indeed a great one to start thank you.
Crystal clear explanation, starting from the very fundamentals
Thank you 🙏
Super teaching!!
Raju is the hero
best video I have ever seen on FOL ....thanks
this is the Best lecture for predicate logic in youtube
what a teacher and what an explanation....great
Best Video on FOL.
Thank you.
Highly recommended.......superb explanation
perfect video sir, all topics clear from just this video and I am also able to solve questions on my own.
Fantastic sir..you are a knowledge resource. thanks a lot...
clear explanation i hAVE seen so far..thanku sir👏
what an explanation sir!!. you clear all my doubts
Hats Off to you Sir.. This was brilliant..
Excellent sir excellent!! Saying "thank you" won't be enough sir.... :D
Waaah ji waaah!!!! Much appreciation
hello
I would just like to say, something good is going to happen on my side, and you're one of the reason.
Thank you so much.
Very nice video .. finally understood how to solve these statements... Thank you so much sir. 😊😊
Thank you for the detailed explanation!
Great video. Very useful
I have one question though: What is wrong with having an empty universe of discourse in FOL?
great clarity.. on explanation thank you sir
Loved the explanation!
The best lecture sir!!
Amazing sir ! Salute to you
Best explanation for predicate logic
Thank you so much for your time and contribution. This video is extremely illuminating. However, I have a little advice on watching your video lesson about "propositional logic basics" first and then watching this video. Because students can find the truth value table in the propositional logic basics' video. Otherwise, it may be a bit difficult to understand why false and false makes false, why true implies false makes false and so on. because they are just rules which we cannot question and prove as you said. All in all, Thank you so much!!!!!
Very good explanation sir, thank you.
Beautifully explained :)
Thank You. Very clear explanation
Really well explained :)
Best explanation ever, was worth every minute
Janith Gamage yeah bro
Great Explanation. Thank You sir
Great work.
GREAT WORK KEEP IT UP!!!!
Excellent video:))
My doubt cleared,amazing sir
Sir I have prepared for UGC net in CS...is this kind of question are comes in that exam also???
My sincere apologies to vaani raju rani pinky bunny who are watching these videos 😉 but at the same time I want to thank you all for making this difficult concept so easy
very good explanation . Keep it up.
That was really helpful!
Thank you sir, very good explanation
good explanation sir!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you from D.R!
V good explanation
very nicely explained. Thank u :)
THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR INCREDIBLE
GOD LEVEL TEACHING 🔥
For "Everyone is liked by someone", does it matter if we choose to use x or y?
clear and concise explanation
Thanks Sir (Nazmul from Bangladesh)
Bestest video 👌👌👌👌👌👌
Great Video
very good explanation
amazing sir
thank you soo much for your video sir
Thank very much sir.
ek no thank you very much sir :* :* :D
thank you professor
You are just ossam actually the college professor should learn how to teach from Kiran sir
nice explanation sir
awesome
Thank you very much
Thank you very much sir🙏
Salute you sir
best fol lecture
Amazed by this!
bits pilani
Iit bombay
Thank you so much 🥲
Thanks sir
Thank you
so good
GREAT
what if the premises contained contradiction? for example, (V implies L), ( L implies B), (M implies -B), (V and M). one could derive (B and M), simplify B out of (B and M). Add R to B. proceed to derive -B, by disjunctive syllogism I have R which is not related to the premise.
Good lecture
sir...don't you have videos of generationg functions,recurrence relations etc
amazing tysmmmmmmmmmmmm
I don't seem to get the difference btn "everyone is liked by someone" and "someone liked everyone" I think the two mean the same.
Sir at 19:00 you wrote
For all x(Lion(x)->coffee(x))
What if animal is not a lion
Then also lion(x)->coffee(x) is true
Which is invalid???? Please reply and clear
thanx a lot sir...hoping for more videos :)
perfect
if we write for all x (lion(x)--->drinks(x,cofffe)) is it right or not
The predicate is the verb part so you may write "drink(x).
So for all x[if Lx then Dx] or for all x(Dx), where object x is a lion.