Very good marketing ploy ''virtual tracks''; but the whole concept of rail efficiency, is low resistance, round steel-wheels rolling on top of flat steel rail lines...this cannot be duplicated, just because the marketing concept says its cool enough to imagine...the only exception would be if the rail car were magnetically elevated...but, that is not so, in this case.
But there are cases where the use of tires and not steel wheels is totally justified, such as Mexico City where the soil is significantly weak and trains with steel wheels literally increase subsidence and damage infrastructure. On the other hand, in cities with steep slopes it is much more feasible to use tires because they have greater traction than traditional trams.
You're literally re-inventing the bi-articulated bus, except that you're introducing the logistical and moral issues of a self-driving car. It even looks identical to the Mettis Van Hool. "Virtual tracks" are called a route. If this is meant to be permanent or something, you're better off with light rail. If it's meant to be flexible: use a bus. This niche literally doesn't exist.
This is a bit disappointing, I thought the vehicle can auto scan the virtual track marks by itself so the driver only needs to either speed up or slow down as if he's driving a tram. So, by the end of the day, it's just a bigger and longer bus.
So, a high-tech overglorified bus, marketed as some sort of future tram, but way more expensive, way less eficient and can get stuck in traffic, well done china.
I cannot read the captions on the video, but I don’t see how this differs from contactless guided bus systems which have operated elsewhere in the world. Am I missing something?
The interesting part is that these carriages don't necessarily connected. They could be running by themselves and follow the lead carriage via wireless connection.
This completely goes against the actual benefits of HAVING tracks. The entire idea is that steel against steel has an extremely lower resistance than rubber on tarmac.
@@Alex-pj8nz The fact that Paris uses rubber wheels doesnt change the fact that having rubber wheels is a bad idea that defeats the purpose of it being a tram
So they made a bus at the length of a tram and said it carries the same number of people as metro. So they’re basically making BRT system just with a tram mask on. Wow what an innovation.
Not really, its basically a fake solution. The entire reason rail transport isn't as impactful on the enviroment is because of the decreased resistance of steel on steel, opposed to rubber on tarmac. All this really was, was China pretending they have a solution with marketing things as something they are not.
The only advantage of this transit is it can carry three times the passengers as an ordinary bus (or more depending on the compartments added by the bus company) and uses slightly less fuel per passenger. It is only useful for cities wanting to upgrade their existing bus fleet or thinking of procuring new buses. A new idea though, good China.
This basically looks like BRT but at the same times it looks like the combination of trolleybus and city trams. Maybe it just needs less space and project funds since it doesnt need tracks.
Key words: "Doesn't need tracks." Overall, this is just a bus trying to be a tram, but then again has NO BENEFITS that come with actually being a tram, because the entire idea is that there is a lower amount of a resistance when on steel rails.
This BUS will still be restricted to traffic speed in most cases. Most cities it would be too hard to dedicate room for this ,, and if they did they still could use existing bus transport on the same routs. just a fancy style that does the same thing.
A really good solution for middle sized cities that cannot afford a metro line but struggle with low bus capacity on the other hand. If this industry can produce affordable railbuses, I think that it will revolutionize our cities, since trams are static and much more expensive to build.
@@bingo737 No, it can carry the same amount of people as the specific tram they have measured it against, which is rather small. The entire ideology of lightrail and tram transit systems is that the impact from steel-on-steel contact is far less resistant than rubber on tarmac. To put what I said simply, the entire reason trams are an actual benefactor for the enviroment is because when tires hit the road it causes tire wear. Not to mention, these busses are battery operated, and not powered by overhead wires, ect. The carbon footprint used to construct these sort of lithium batteries is normally more impactful than a Deseil BRT overall. Lithium batteries are prone to fires with unknown causes and no warning. Lithium batteries will completely engulf whatever is in it, and they are extremely hard to put out in comparason to a regular fire. Trams use far less power consumtion to move due to the fact that the friction caused from roads is far more than sturdy steel rail. Overall, this project was even embarrassing *for its timeframe,* being a glorified BRT that pretends to be a tram, having the negatives of being a bus, and a (battery powered [see previous paragraph on lithium batteries]) electric bus. Meanwhile, they do not gain any of the actual driving points for installing a lightrail or tram system in to an area.
Pity about the sound cutting out.for about 5 minutes in total. The presenter should have rehearsed his speech he was all over the place, that with the sound quality made this rubbish.
The King Not really like what America was. I've been waiting for the bullet train to go from DC and NYC since 5th grade late 60's. The Mega City of DC/NYC/Boston still hadn't materialized (since the late 60's).
Nice job, but I have a few questions: 1) how can a few hundred people fit in that thing??? It literally is a tram just without rails, it can’t have the capacity of a subway! 2) what if there is a traffic jam?? How will this be rapid if other motor vehicles are blocking it’s way? 3) I don’t speak Chinese, don’t start the video in English and then pass to Chinese
надо бы звук добавить и музыку ,комментарий,такому транспорту нужна своя огороженная дорога ,и прямолинейная (что бы достигать максимальных скоростей,как в метро )
I think that it isn’t a new bus technology, bus with virtual tracks exist since 2001 and in France. The city that uses this technology is Rouen and this buses are called teor ( transport est ouest rouennais i guess)
How does this thing get power/electricity? This is electric right? A tram gets power from overhead lines, what about this? If it has batteries what's the mileage before re-charge?
Everything fine, but one question. I saw moment that system is checking traffic in the road and drive by different road. This different road doesn't have vertical characters, so first why and what actually driver do in the bus.
It this a bus or a tram?! I don't know! there are Bus that are trailered like O405G. CRRC was like I don't know! should I build a BRT or Tram! Ok let's combine both together that this is what they are
And while the rest of the western societies continue to doubt chinese technology and look down on the chinese, the chinese power ahead and one day they will become the most technologically advanced country in the world. I have been to Shanghai already and it is way more advanced than most of Europe. The Chinese are way more advanced in terms of embracing the future and technology. When I go to Europe I still feel like I am stuck in some medieval times. Yet some caucasians are still looking down on the Asians thinking they are the superior race. lol.
There are no rails! That’s called a bus. I’d replace the rubber tires with steel wheels, and then run it as an actual train. Switching would be done by metal barriers. Then all it would have to do is go forward.
Dude, this is meant to convert existing roads or building new dedicated asphalt roads in a short time! Not every country has a rail line but most have roads or can build one cheaply. Rail lines are very expensive to build !
@@Lobo-Lobo The reason they are expensive to build is because thats what actually makes trams and light rail efficient. This literally defeats the entire purpose of being a "bus tram"
The roadside sensors would be expensive alone. Best bet is to have all sensors for the vehicle ON the vehicle. Correct placement would allow it to detect curbs and other hazards.
cujoe Mblakk. The Dutch system Phileas had magnets instead of optical guidance. The main problem with guided busways is the wear and tear of wheel tracks, leading to the more expensive replacement of the road surface with concrete.
Same question applies low trams, buses, small cars when snowing or raining simple,, commuters here in Finland no one concern accident, derailment of trams and bus or car accident because here Scandinavian region people who working snow removal companies, workers who working icy road safety systems they adopted the techniques how to prevented accident of icy,snowing or raining condition roads,,,,in Scandinavian people adopt slip icy condition,, even they help with those techniques to America, UK, which have worst accident every winter many people die or injured
POV: Your city is too lazy to actually build a tram system
Actually it’s cheap
Very good marketing ploy ''virtual tracks''; but the whole concept of rail efficiency, is low resistance, round steel-wheels rolling on top of flat steel rail lines...this cannot be duplicated, just because the marketing concept says its cool enough to imagine...the only exception would be if the rail car were magnetically elevated...but, that is not so, in this case.
The fact i keep getting people arguing against this point in my own comments even though my initial comments are over a year or two old
But there are cases where the use of tires and not steel wheels is totally justified, such as Mexico City where the soil is significantly weak and trains with steel wheels literally increase subsidence and damage infrastructure. On the other hand, in cities with steep slopes it is much more feasible to use tires because they have greater traction than traditional trams.
You're literally re-inventing the bi-articulated bus, except that you're introducing the logistical and moral issues of a self-driving car.
It even looks identical to the Mettis Van Hool.
"Virtual tracks" are called a route. If this is meant to be permanent or something, you're better off with light rail. If it's meant to be flexible: use a bus.
This niche literally doesn't exist.
Thank you for calling it a bus.
This is a bit disappointing, I thought the vehicle can auto scan the virtual track marks by itself so the driver only needs to either speed up or slow down as if he's driving a tram. So, by the end of the day, it's just a bigger and longer bus.
So, a high-tech overglorified bus, marketed as some sort of future tram, but way more expensive, way less eficient and can get stuck in traffic, well done china.
I cannot read the captions on the video, but I don’t see how this differs from contactless guided bus systems which have operated elsewhere in the world. Am I missing something?
I was excited until I saw the steering wheel. I guess the technology is a bit further off
its like driving long bus on the road...
Within my city, riding this kind of train is going to be bumpy AF.
Doesn't the lack of rails cause a lot of tire wear?
Precisely. It is a bus that tries to be a tram, with all the negatives of being a bus and none of the positives of being a tram
Isn’t it just a big bus?? The driver is still steering.
The interesting part is that these carriages don't necessarily connected. They could be running by themselves and follow the lead carriage via wireless connection.
It is an electrical bus, operated by battery..put it in simple term
This completely goes against the actual benefits of HAVING tracks. The entire idea is that steel against steel has an extremely lower resistance than rubber on tarmac.
The paris subway has rubber wheels instead of rails.
@@Alex-pj8nz Doesn't change my points though
@@DefaultMale_ No, you said that goes against the benefits of having tracks and yet the paris metro still uses rubber wheels.
@@Alex-pj8nz The fact that Paris uses rubber wheels doesnt change the fact that having rubber wheels is a bad idea that defeats the purpose of it being a tram
@@DefaultMale_ Actually this means you are wrong
What is the point of this? A driverless tram would be much more easy to run and to put into practice.
TheSweetsOfSin No rails or overhead lines have to be installed
congratulations
The guy said he going to research and development team for answers and he literally went. No cuts.
I'd say its more of a tram than a bus...
So they made a bus at the length of a tram and said it carries the same number of people as metro. So they’re basically making BRT system just with a tram mask on. Wow what an innovation.
So they’re basically making BRT system just with a tram mask on, that doesn't have any of the benefits of actually being a tram.
is what you mean
That’s a bendy bus….. stop saying it’s a trackless train.
It is funny the USA is still like an old fashion dinosaur with technology
A solution for a better pattern of life, and a way to reduce pollution at the urban traffic, liked !
Not really, its basically a fake solution. The entire reason rail transport isn't as impactful on the enviroment is because of the decreased resistance of steel on steel, opposed to rubber on tarmac.
All this really was, was China pretending they have a solution with marketing things as something they are not.
India.Maharashtra . Nagpur also has this technology
Sure the second and third segments are SMARTLY doing exactly the same track of chiefcar, not simply being pulled
ESTE TRANVÍA ES EL QUE BOGOTÁ NESECITA
The only advantage of this transit is it can carry three times the passengers as an ordinary bus (or more depending on the compartments added by the bus company) and uses slightly less fuel per passenger. It is only useful for cities wanting to upgrade their existing bus fleet or thinking of procuring new buses. A new idea though, good China.
wasnt even really good tbf. The project got cancelled because the busses were found to be really dangerous
Do a burnout. Maybe a donut or two?
Really cool
i
Designed in China by CRRC!
sooo basically a large bus that looks like a metro train?
This basically looks like BRT but at the same times it looks like the combination of trolleybus and city trams. Maybe it just needs less space and project funds since it doesnt need tracks.
Key words: "Doesn't need tracks."
Overall, this is just a bus trying to be a tram, but then again has NO BENEFITS that come with actually being a tram, because the entire idea is that there is a lower amount of a resistance when on steel rails.
China always amaze me, Good job China. btw I'm an Indian
Awesome!
not really...
I'm from Ecuador and I'm developing a massive transportation service for a College proyect. This video safe my life, my proyect and my sleep time
Follows a guided route but has a steering wheel? Okay
Yack yack yack, yudda yudda yudda, blah blah blah = Cut out the talking by fastforwarding to 13:45 to see it moving.
They hate china, but I'm gonna ride this to school everyday, so happy.
Pakistan 👍❤️ China.
Brazil Love China.
This is slow for a train. Why not just have a bus?
this is totally unrealistic . almost all of it is WRONG ! electrification is the first issue . sorry my friend NO GOOD!
This BUS will still be restricted to traffic speed in most cases. Most cities it would be too hard to dedicate room for this ,, and if they did they still could use existing bus transport on the same routs. just a fancy style that does the same thing.
Nice left ear presentation
What an amazing explanatory video. Shame it's not voiced-over in some European language, 'cos I don't read Chinese.
Nicole K
it's have English subtitles, just check out
Just paint the route with 'white line' paint, loaded with iron filings?
No need, it has a driver.
Trolejbus na baterie . Fajna wizja. Tylko po co drzwi po obu stronach ? To nie pociąg .
Here in Sweden there are buses that look just like this.
so its a bus
A really good solution for middle sized cities that cannot afford a metro line but struggle with low bus capacity on the other hand. If this industry can produce affordable railbuses, I think that it will revolutionize our cities, since trams are static and much more expensive to build.
Or just build a tram line
@@CreatorPolar doesn't "since trams are static and much more expensive to build" tell you anything?
@@bingo737 but if your bus system is overcrowded then it’s time to invest into trams
@@CreatorPolar The video literally shows you that this bus can carry the same amount of people as trams.
@@bingo737 No, it can carry the same amount of people as the specific tram they have measured it against, which is rather small. The entire ideology of lightrail and tram transit systems is that the impact from steel-on-steel contact is far less resistant than rubber on tarmac. To put what I said simply, the entire reason trams are an actual benefactor for the enviroment is because when tires hit the road it causes tire wear.
Not to mention, these busses are battery operated, and not powered by overhead wires, ect. The carbon footprint used to construct these sort of lithium batteries is normally more impactful than a Deseil BRT overall. Lithium batteries are prone to fires with unknown causes and no warning. Lithium batteries will completely engulf whatever is in it, and they are extremely hard to put out in comparason to a regular fire.
Trams use far less power consumtion to move due to the fact that the friction caused from roads is far more than sturdy steel rail. Overall, this project was even embarrassing *for its timeframe,* being a glorified BRT that pretends to be a tram, having the negatives of being a bus, and a (battery powered [see previous paragraph on lithium batteries]) electric bus. Meanwhile, they do not gain any of the actual driving points for installing a lightrail or tram system in to an area.
A bus that looks like a tram. Is that it??
Yep
Pity about the sound cutting out.for about 5 minutes in total. The presenter should have rehearsed his speech he was all over the place, that with the sound quality made this rubbish.
On wheels like a bus :-)
No, it’s stopped its operation... the wear and tear on the asphalt amongst one reason...
Kudo's , China today is what America was one hundred years a go, vibrant, idealist , hard working and looking toward the future.
The King Not really like what America was. I've been waiting for the bullet train to go from DC and NYC since 5th grade late 60's. The Mega City of DC/NYC/Boston still hadn't materialized (since the late 60's).
The King America is still delevoping.
I don't doubt it, we are developing corn, porn, tweeters, face book and stuff like that.
I would say less than 100 years behind. Even though the Space Shuttle is obsolete now... if we give you guys one, do try to keep up. =D
but2star not now but soon
Nice job, but I have a few questions:
1) how can a few hundred people fit in that thing??? It literally is a tram just without rails, it can’t have the capacity of a subway!
2) what if there is a traffic jam?? How will this be rapid if other motor vehicles are blocking it’s way?
3) I don’t speak Chinese, don’t start the video in English and then pass to Chinese
This is just an articulated streetcar..
надо бы звук добавить и музыку ,комментарий,такому транспорту нужна своя огороженная дорога ,и прямолинейная (что бы достигать максимальных скоростей,как в метро )
I think that it isn’t a new bus technology, bus with virtual tracks exist since 2001 and in France. The city that uses this technology is Rouen and this buses are called teor ( transport est ouest rouennais i guess)
How does this thing get power/electricity? This is electric right? A tram gets power from overhead lines, what about this? If it has batteries what's the mileage before re-charge?
Everything fine, but one question. I saw moment that system is checking traffic in the road and drive by different road. This different road doesn't have vertical characters, so first why and what actually driver do in the bus.
Yeah that's also I wonder and it doesn't show how the bus or train back on track, I mean it has to reach the next stop right?
Nice concept but will it work in the winter? Maybe you have to rely on Signal lines in the pavement...
The bus can also run on the road without signal line if need
I like the train but this video needs to be edited down.
It this a bus or a tram?! I don't know! there are Bus that are trailered like O405G. CRRC was like I don't know! should I build a BRT or Tram! Ok let's combine both together that this is what they are
so just a very long bus
Can it get a flat?
Would be helpful to have captions or maybe audio
What’s the difference from using electric bus with restricted bus lane.
Dude flying the drone around it needs to get a new job :/
where is that?
ᕮ
It's a track bus, but I guess, before the law it would be a tram.
So much energy to better the lives of the Chinese people. In the West it has to make a profit first, which sucks.
wonder ful.chaina is realy hard working country.idon't know how they do and manage challanges.
wonder ful.chaina is realy hard working country.idon't know how they do and manage challanges.
That doesn't look a bus. It's probably a tram/light rail vehicle that runs on virtual tracks.
It's just a bus... LRT will get people out of their cars. A bus won't!
And while the rest of the western societies continue to doubt chinese technology and look down on the chinese, the chinese power ahead and one day they will become the most technologically advanced country in the world. I have been to Shanghai already and it is way more advanced than most of Europe. The Chinese are way more advanced in terms of embracing the future and technology. When I go to Europe I still feel like I am stuck in some medieval times. Yet some caucasians are still looking down on the Asians thinking they are the superior race. lol.
This just seems like trains but worse.
It is not a bus! If you think it is a bus then you do not know what a train is !
How much? 😞
This is literally just a driverless BRT system
a bus ?
NOT a bus, more a train.
it's just driverless light rail but worse
Did anybody think about how auto drivers are gonna get confused with those rail markings looking so much like roadway lines.
Hello,good morning thank you for doing wonderful you have greatness in you you are beautiful,and I hope you have a great day. Goodnight
How much is each train of this type?
If it’s got no rails, it’s not a train
It’s an bus! And on Tomonews US you can see the comments
They're called trollies and still run in Philadelphia but on tracks, this is just the modern version.
can I know the cost of ART as compared to LRT (sorry, so embarrassed to compare it with such old system
Sydney has just spent $B2 on a very limited LRT,it could have purchased 60 plus of these vehicles.
Just another Bus .. Why Bother???????
Will this be in London one day in the future? 🤔
I thought the same thing for Turkey 🙋♂️
DoubleDeckerAnton this is just boo
Hello, good morning thank you for the greatness you are you are beautiful,and I hope you have a great day. Goodnight.
There are no rails! That’s called a bus. I’d replace the rubber tires with steel wheels, and then run it as an actual train. Switching would be done by metal barriers. Then all it would have to do is go forward.
Dude, this is meant to convert existing roads or building new dedicated asphalt roads in a short time! Not every country has a rail line but most have roads or can build one cheaply. Rail lines are very expensive to build !
@@Lobo-Lobo The reason they are expensive to build is because thats what actually makes trams and light rail efficient. This literally defeats the entire purpose of being a "bus tram"
The roadside sensors would be expensive alone. Best bet is to have all sensors for the vehicle ON the vehicle. Correct placement would allow it to detect curbs and other hazards.
What happen with the recording?
Chinese's englishloz...
what happen, when there is water or snow on the road?
cujoe Mblakk. The Dutch system Phileas had magnets instead of optical guidance. The main problem with guided busways is the wear and tear of wheel tracks, leading to the more expensive replacement of the road surface with concrete.
And how does the dutch system move?
Good question!
Same question applies low trams, buses, small cars when snowing or raining simple,, commuters here in Finland no one concern accident, derailment of trams and bus or car accident because here Scandinavian region people who working snow removal companies, workers who working icy road safety systems they adopted the techniques how to prevented accident of icy,snowing or raining condition roads,,,,in Scandinavian people adopt slip icy condition,, even they help with those techniques to America, UK, which have worst accident every winter many people die or injured
F
Great china indian also friend chain
they saved tones of money on rail tracks but whatif there's a rush hour this thing will stuck
They should promote more mass tranportation like this one to reduce private cars on the street..
Indians can do easy better than this
WAIT WAIT OMG THEY MADE BUS F
The tracking is a copy of a Siemens' product.