@@josephmartin1543 ..September event was a reaction to actions of Russians done in February, same year. When you say "A", do not wonder why others say "B".
The Russian bots are active in the comments. Sometimes I wonder if the FSB has no other cards to play instead of running bot farms. It's very sad for a "powerful" nation to devolve themselves in trying to shape public opinion, especially when they are losing so much of their own culture, people and history.
Only russia would buy these wrecks (although indirectly through many middlemen). Actually it’s a monetary risk to take control over these ships. You may end up having to pay for the cost of scrapping them. The way through insurances to cover the cost should and will likely be taken. However they will probably find there’s no insurance covering this ship. This could however lead to ships entering the baltic sea, passing through either Danish or Swedish territorial waters, in the future will have to meed requirements that satisfy certain insurance and ship safety standards. That will either move russia’s shadow fleet out of the Baltic Sea or make it more costly for them to manage such a fleet. And russia couldn’t whine too much if they don’t want to reveal what everyone already knows: that they belong to their shadow fleet.
@@abrakkehakka1357 OK. many things i didn't knew. but is it possible to stop a ship before it is entering the Baltic sea to check for insurance? those are international waters that shipping lane, are they not? who can control those vesels? and based in which law?
Well done Finland. Why is this the first? They are suspected of a crime, storm the vessel, find out more info and if guilty sentence them. Why wasn't this done before?
Believe it or not, but seizing a ship in international waters can be construed as piracy. According to Maritime Law, the authorities of the diminutive Cook Islands, halfway around the world, should've done the honours(!). It'll be interesting to see if and how the Cook Islanders prosecute those responsible. Maybe they'll think twice about being a flag of convenience.
@@peabase there is a law that allows to detain a ship in international waters if it has done damage. this is what many maritime specialists say in their TH-cam canals. i do not know anything about sea laws. but there are many of them saying that. and it looks like this ship is having phony insurance covering it. perhaps that should be a major concern for Cook islands. to make sure that their ships follow the rules.
@@arisplugis5197 Maritime Law allows for a vessel to be seized in international waters if it engages in piracy. Damaging property may conceivably come under piracy, but it's hard to ascertain, especially in these anchor-dragging cases. If Somali pirates attack shipping around the Horn of Africa, there will be distress calls, but subsea cable-cutting isn't that obvious. It's similar to making a citizen's arrest. Unless there's an in flagrante delicto situation, the arresting citizen could be accused of kidnapping or unlawful restraint. It's because as mere citizens, we don't have the same powers as the police. The same is true for our authorities in international waters.
In my opinion men trying to sound like flirting woman to seduce little boys : sssa sasa sasa . In my opinion is repugnant. Financed by EU Taxpayers, shame !
this shipping corridor in Baltic sea is considered international waters. you can ban Russian ships from docking in Baltic ports. but you can not ban them in international waters according to existing maritime law.
Fiber doesn't take long, the vessel is on the way to fix them, but 20cm DC-power cables are heavy and a diffrent matter. I also suspect Russia will try to cut the remaining power cable leading to Estonia which would raise price of the electricity in Baltics (the target of these attacks).
it is very hard to track down real owners of this ship. because company is registered in Saudi Arabia. but ship sails under Cook islands flag. crew members mostly are Indians, Georgians and many other Asians. and it looks like the ship didn't had an insurance. not in major shipping insurance company data base at least. this is official information we get from Finland so far. it looks like someone bought a cheep ship to do this sabotage. and is trying to hide all connections to this ship.
@@lucasworktv investigate what yacht? from where information about yacht? they found a very suspicious cargo ship missing anchor. so, of course primarily Finland will investigate that.
The repair of its broken cable will cost 30 million euros. The price of the ship's cargo is 30 million euros. Next, cargo expropriation for damages
@@theikki There is one proverb: "You'll get ears from a dead donkey".
Latvia 🇱🇻❤️🇫🇮
Cutting power/communication cables is an act of war IMO.
The Nordstream was the first one
@@josephmartin1543 So, according to you: "Event in September TRIGGERED events in February, same year!". Right? :P
@@josephmartin1543 ..September event was a reaction to actions of Russians done in February, same year. When you say "A", do not wonder why others say "B".
The Russian bots are active in the comments. Sometimes I wonder if the FSB has no other cards to play instead of running bot farms. It's very sad for a "powerful" nation to devolve themselves in trying to shape public opinion, especially when they are losing so much of their own culture, people and history.
It's hard to earn Rubles in russia these days, trolling or going to the front.
sell the ship to cover repair costs.
Only russia would buy these wrecks (although indirectly through many middlemen). Actually it’s a monetary risk to take control over these ships. You may end up having to pay for the cost of scrapping them.
The way through insurances to cover the cost should and will likely be taken. However they will probably find there’s no insurance covering this ship. This could however lead to ships entering the baltic sea, passing through either Danish or Swedish territorial waters, in the future will have to meed requirements that satisfy certain insurance and ship safety standards. That will either move russia’s shadow fleet out of the Baltic Sea or make it more costly for them to manage such a fleet. And russia couldn’t whine too much if they don’t want to reveal what everyone already knows: that they belong to their shadow fleet.
@@abrakkehakka1357 OK. many things i didn't knew. but is it possible to stop a ship before it is entering the Baltic sea to check for insurance? those are international waters that shipping lane, are they not? who can control those vesels? and based in which law?
@arisplugis5197 That's what 12 countries are now going to do.
Well done Finland. Why is this the first? They are suspected of a crime, storm the vessel, find out more info and if guilty sentence them. Why wasn't this done before?
Believe it or not, but seizing a ship in international waters can be construed as piracy. According to Maritime Law, the authorities of the diminutive Cook Islands, halfway around the world, should've done the honours(!). It'll be interesting to see if and how the Cook Islanders prosecute those responsible. Maybe they'll think twice about being a flag of convenience.
@peabase good thing it was not in international waters...
@@peabase there is a law that allows to detain a ship in international waters if it has done damage. this is what many maritime specialists say in their TH-cam canals. i do not know anything about sea laws. but there are many of them saying that.
and it looks like this ship is having phony insurance covering it. perhaps that should be a major concern for Cook islands. to make sure that their ships follow the rules.
@@user-zz8lb6bd7p It was in international waters, too. What gave you the idea it wasn't?
@@arisplugis5197 Maritime Law allows for a vessel to be seized in international waters if it engages in piracy. Damaging property may conceivably come under piracy, but it's hard to ascertain, especially in these anchor-dragging cases. If Somali pirates attack shipping around the Horn of Africa, there will be distress calls, but subsea cable-cutting isn't that obvious.
It's similar to making a citizen's arrest. Unless there's an in flagrante delicto situation, the arresting citizen could be accused of kidnapping or unlawful restraint. It's because as mere citizens, we don't have the same powers as the police. The same is true for our authorities in international waters.
NATO countries may need to start escorting all ships into/out-of Russian ports to ensure no anchor etc drops.
How drunk is this narrator 😆
In my opinion men trying to sound like flirting woman to seduce little boys : sssa sasa sasa . In my opinion is repugnant. Financed by EU Taxpayers, shame !
It was Medvedev?
Ai.
Previous two cables were done for 10 days in much distant and open sea location.
Not all cables are created equal.
@peabase
Pretty clear... The cables and pipes that we tore are not the same as those that were broken by our neighbors.
@VladimirStepanov-e6h You make precious little sense.
All Russia related shipping must be banned from the Baltic Sea.
this shipping corridor in Baltic sea is considered international waters. you can ban Russian ships from docking in Baltic ports. but you can not ban them in international waters according to existing maritime law.
Why so long time to fix the cable?
Fiber doesn't take long, the vessel is on the way to fix them, but 20cm DC-power cables are heavy and a diffrent matter.
I also suspect Russia will try to cut the remaining power cable leading to Estonia which would raise price of the electricity in Baltics (the target of these attacks).
@iam5085
БРЕД...
Wasn’t it a Chinese ship at first?
it is very hard to track down real owners of this ship. because company is registered in Saudi Arabia. but ship sails under Cook islands flag. crew members mostly are Indians, Georgians and many other Asians. and it looks like the ship didn't had an insurance. not in major shipping insurance company data base at least. this is official information we get from Finland so far.
it looks like someone bought a cheep ship to do this sabotage. and is trying to hide all connections to this ship.
@ then why blame Russia? 🤣
@@lucasworktv because ship was carrying Russian oil. and owners name of that company in Saudi Arabia sounds and writes Russian.
@@lucasworktv but first they thought that the ship is Chinese because most crew is Asian.
@ what do you mean by sounds Russian? If it a Saudi company, what does Russia have to do with it?
State sponsored Priracy.
Since when has investigating a possible crime become state sponsored piracy. Feel like it's piracy only when targeting terroruzzia.
Why they don't search Ukrainian yacht?
Cos its somewere in masters ( read US ) army
because police found the ship that is missing an anchor.
Because they won’t investigate their proxies
@@lucasworktv investigate what yacht? from where information about yacht?
they found a very suspicious cargo ship missing anchor. so, of course primarily Finland will investigate that.
@ nord stream 2?
IT IS WAR