Of course if he as a blessing to you what happened to Nova Festival our young boys and girls there was idol worship front of the Buddhist status dancing singing like Mount sinai. Where was your great rabbai tovia. Hope he was sleeping at that time.
Thank you, Tovia for all your teaching and all your your incredible research and study of the scriptures and the christian bible so as to thoroughly teach us the truth ..of the only true G-d …you have had a profound influence over my understanding of the scriptures and how to live as a non-jew following Judaism..forsaking Christianity and all the emotional attachments to it and most of all repenting of following a false god….and false religion even though it was comforting and I thought it was true…but the Torah cannot lie..it was a slow process for me but very thorough one..I pray for your safety in Israel and healing for your people and your land..
The ONE TRUE GOD *IS* The INVISIBLE Spirit which took on a body of flesh to become a Saviour for lost humanity. IN CHRIST there is *neither* Jew not Gentile...
I thought you would appreciate this anecdote from Rav Schachter. Members of the Jewish community came to Rabbeinu Tam one of the foremost Tosephists, complaining that Christians were ‘teasing’ them with the Torah itself. They claimed that the Torah itself supported the notion of the trinity from the first three letters, ‘beis’, ‘reish’, and ‘aleph’ which they said stood for ben,the son, ruach, the spirit, and av, the father. Rabbeinu Tam took a moment and then responded. “Tell them that the next three letters are ‘shin’, ‘yud’, and ‘taf’. This he countered stand for ‘sheker’ falsehood, ‘Yeshu’, ‘tihiye’. Jesus is false. His point, just as what I have just said based on a few letters, is nonsense, so, their claims are equally ridiculous.
@@bt-lt4os: NOWHERE does that verse mention the name of the "Jesus" character, so you can't 'shoehorn' it in there where it doesn't belong! God specifically told us NOT to add or subtract from His ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) words! Since you have never learned from the Orthodox Rabbis, as commanded by God in Deut. 17:8-11, you have NO clue what this verse ACTUALLY means! You need to realize, research, and accept, that NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES (i.e. NO "NT") were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, and that the ENTIRETY of the Hebrew scriptures, i.e. TANACH, that consists of the Torah, the Prophets and the Writings (i.e. Psalms, Proverbs, etc.) were given to Moses at Mt. Sinai. Also given to Moses at that time, was the Talmud, which is the explanations and details of the Tanach, without which it is impossible to understand the words given to Moses. Christianity foolishly REJECTS the Talmud, which resulted in their bastardization of God's ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) words, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God ACTUALLY said to us at Mt. Sinai, which resulted in the false, pagan, man-made, blasphemous religion of "Christianity", that preaches AGAINST what God said to us there. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover) and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books "Let's Get Biblical - Why Doesn't Judaism Accept the Christian Messiah?", as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
@@emprah387: You apparently know zero about the Hebrew scriptures, because you haven't learned from the Orthodox Rabbis, as commanded by God in Deut. 17:8-11. In the absence of the Temple, the Rabbis are our spiritual teachers, since they (and ONLY THEY!!) have been studying the original Hebrew scriptures, all the way back to Mt. Sinai, something Christianity and Islam REFUSED to do, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God said to us there. You need to realize, research, and accept, that NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES (i.e. NO "NT" and NO "Quran") were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, and that the ENTIRETY of the Hebrew scriptures, i.e. TANACH, that consists of the Torah, the Prophets and the Writings (i.e. Psalms, Proverbs, etc.) were given to Moses at Mt. Sinai. Also given to Moses at that time, was the Talmud, which is the explanations and details of the Tanach, without which it is impossible to understand the words given to Moses. Christianity (and Islam) foolishly REJECTS the Talmud, which resulted in their bastardization of God's ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) words, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God ACTUALLY said to us at Mt. Sinai, which resulted in the false, pagan, man-made, blasphemous religion of "Christianity" (and later, Islam, which is not pagan, like Christianity), that preaches AGAINST what God said to us there. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover) and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books "Let's Get Biblical - Why Doesn't Judaism Accept the Christian Messiah?", as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
The Jewish people have endured so much hatred for many centuries all over the world, yet Jewish people in general are very loving and kind. God bless the Jewish people and Israel.
But WHY? I guess because of NO REASON AT ALL. From Egyptians to Persians to Romans to turks to English to almost everywhere they have been to. And just for no reason at all.
Paul was more than a "bad faith actor." As you, Rabbi, have pointed out (and I can show anyone many more examples right there, screaming out at you, in his letters) Paul was a prodigious liar. I was stunned one day to hear a pastor tell his congregation that Paul was the most morally upright person who has ever lived. Stunned, I tell you! A deep dive into the NT writings plainly reveals what a vile person Paul was. And no one with any common sense wanted anything to do with him. "You know that everyone in the province of Asia has deserted me, including Phygelus and Hermogenes." - 2 Tim. 1:15 (NIV).
I agree! I argued with more than one preacher when I attended Christian churches about Paul's lack of trustworthiness and his hatred of women and dislike of even the deciples!
Obviously. Good luck getting them to understand that all of Christendom is worshipping Paul in Jesus' name in vain. That's why I say... Do as thou wilt was the whole of the law according to Paul a long time before Aleister Crowley was born into this world.
@@user-cw3ox2nn5t You have missed my point. They wholesale ignore everything Jesus had to say in favor of Paul's watered down gospel of lies and have no clue that there is even any difference at all between what Jesus taught and what Paul taught. In this, they have made an idol out of Paul and worship him exclusively using the name of Jesus in vain.
Considering how Paul never read anything that Jesus wrote (i.e. Jesus never wrote anything) or spoke (no written gospels existed during Paul’s lifetime) then Paul was operating from ignorance. After all, his “faith” doctrine was “revealed” to him. Paul apparently believed that he had a euphoric religious experience that led him to Arabia where he received his “revelation of Christ.”
Any one who has to prequalify his statement that he (Paul) is "telling the truth, I am not lying" I question their integrity. Why not know you are an honest person and just speak the truth?
@drakejuice9384 I'm not doing your homework for you. You can read their work or not. You can read Bruno Bauer, James Ballantyne Hannay and Ronald Syme, or not.
this is very truth. THOSE who do not know or have never understood the Torah or old testament, CAN'T understand how Paul corrupted the Jesus movement and the Essenes and early 1 st century. The Christians and the history writers have for long, given the Jews a bad reputation as hating Christianity .but really they were seeing their culture hijacked and corrupted by a GREAT MARKETER and charismatic liar like Paul.
I know rabbi Singer became am apologist due to Christians trying to mislead Jews and he's awesome at it. I believe Hashem is also using him to allow non Jews (I identified as a Christian for almost 30 years. Around 6 years ago I left. I'm a Noahide now]) who were searching for the truth to learn. Even when I was a Christian I knew it wasn't right but it was "comfortable" I had to leave because my burning and hunger for the truth wouldn't allow me to stay. I hope to convert to Judaism but must move to where an orthodox synagogue is. Even if I'm never able to convert I still KNOW Judaism is the truth and will worship Hashem until I die.
Once again thank you Rabbi Singer for standing on the battlefield. Combating the hypocrisy and idolatry worship of Christianity. The Tanakh has not changed.. The Prophet Isaiah says it all 42:6… Continue serving as the Rabbinical light unto the Nations….
@@cobraofficer8399 1. God forbids idol worship. 2. Praying to saints or Mary or Jesus who are creations instead of praying only to God who is the creator is idol worship in Judaism and Islam and in some Christian sects. 3. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in Tanakh is a human biological descendant of the messiah king David through the messiah king Solomon meaning the messiah is not God and not a Trinity with God. 4. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in the Quran is a human who did not descend from the messiah king David because a person who has no biological father inherits no tribe in Judaism. 5. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus said he did not die on the cross meaning no one sacrificed him and he explains that he is a human and he is not God. 6. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that not all Christians believe that Jesus is God or that Jesus is a Trinity with God.
@@cobraofficer8399 See 1. Appalled Christian Caller! "You call my religion idolatry?" Rabbi Tovia Singer responds. See 2. Rabbi Tovia Singer slams Church for erecting a barrier between man and God. See 3. Did the early Jews believe In a Triune God? Rabbi Tovia slams pastor John Piper. Progressive revelation. See 4. I’m not a Christian anymore. What can I do? Rabbi Tovia Singer responds.
I was sought by those who did not ask; I was found by those who did not seek me. I said.."Here, I am..... Here, I am" to a NATION that not call on my name. I spread out my hands all day long to a rebellious people who walk in the path that is not good, following their own thoughts and they continually anger me to my face. They say... " Keep to yourself, I am too holy for you!"
*God's covenant with His people is eternal as is his law (the Torah)!!* *Leviticus 26* 41 Then I too, will treat them as happenstance and bring them [back while] in the land of their enemies. If then, their clogged heart becomes humbled, then, [their sufferings] will gain appeasement for their iniquity, 42 and I will remember My covenant [with] Jacob, and also My covenant [with] Isaac, and also My covenant [with] Abraham I will remember. And I will remember the Land, 43 [For] the Land will be bereft of them, appeasing its sabbaticals when it had been desolate of them, and they will gain appeasement for their iniquity. This was all in retribution for their having despised My ordinances and in retribution for their having rejected My statutes. 44 But despite all this, while they are in the land of their enemies, *I will not despise them nor will I reject them to annihilate them, thereby breaking My covenant that is with them, for I am the Lord their God.* *Judges 2:1* 1And a messenger of the Lord went up from Gilgal to Bochim and said (in God's name), "I will take you up from Egypt and I have brought you to the land that I have sworn to your forefathers and I said, *'I will not break my covenant with you forever.* *The eternity of the law:* *Numbers **15:22* “‘Now if you as a community unintentionally fail to keep any of these commands the Lord gave Moses- 23 any of the Lord’s commands to you through him, from the day the Lord gave them and continuing *through the generations to come* *Deuteronomy 5:3* It was not with our ancestors[a] that the Lord made this covenant, *but with us, with all of us who are alive here today.* *Psalm 119:89* *Your word, Lord, is eternal;* it stands firm in the heavens. *Psalm 119:152* *Long ago I learned from your statutes that you established them to last forever.* *See what God tells us:* *See Hosea 3:4-5:* 4 For the Israelites will live many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred stones, without ephod or household gods. 5 Afterward the Israelites will return and seek the Lord their God and David their king. They will come trembling to the Lord and to his blessings in the last days. *We sinned, He punishes us, but He will never break his covenant with us - He promised.* *All other religions are not from God.* *Jesus was not the promised messiah. He accomplished nothing and according to the NT he made false prophecies and mistakes !* *Would you like to read those ?*
First of All, we do not worship "A Religion", we worship a GOD who saved us from our own sinful nature through the sacrifice of Our LORD CHRIST. We follow the teachings of JESHUA,the heart of the Law or Torah, that we should love GOD with all our heart and with all our soul and with all our strength and to love our neighbor as ourselves. What we can take out of the books written in the Tanack is that Israel has been under GOD's judgement throughout scripture keeping his promise to Abraham that GOD would offer protection and land to him and his descendants, but they must follow the path of God not entitled to "ALL" but a "REMNANT" who remain faithful and has received the truth and received grace from the living GOD. You seem far from the GOD of Israel as your words do not speak truth. JESHUA foretold that not one stone of your temple would stand, as your sacrifices are a stench unto the ETERNAL. "HE IS" the temple and the ONLY way to the FATHER We bless Israel for the savior was borne out of the tribe of David whose kingdom there would be no end and he will reign over the house of Jacob FOREVER. The prophet Micah5:2 stated that from Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.” You are right, you will have a temple and you will have a Messiah but it will be an evil incarnate of satan and he will declare himself GOD and desecrate the place where GOD wrote his NAME. These are perilous times called Jacob's trouble.@@PazPinhasRahamim9220
@ramirochavera, Is. 65:1: "I allowed Myself to be sought by those who did not ask; I allowed Myself to be found by those who did not seek Me, I said, "Here I am; here I am!" to a nation not called by My name." This refers to the Jews scattered among the Gentiles, such as to Babylonia and Assyria (Gentile nations that did not call on God's name). God returns and restores these scattered Jews (who are the remnant) back to Israel., and through the remnant the nation of Israel thrives again. The restoration of the Jews is the major theme of Isaiah, particularly in the final chapters (60-66). Verse 9 establishes the identity of the remnant Jews: "And I will extract seed (descendants) from Jacob and from Judah, the heir of My mountains, and My elect shall inherit it, and My servants shall dwell there." It has nothing to do with Christianity/Christians. That's not Isaiah's theme.
Misinterpreting the text is usually the case. Isaiah 65 is referring to those that were not his chosen, a gentile nation, not the Jews taken into exile because this was GOD's judgement for their rejection of him. Isaiah references back to Israel, a rebellious people who continue to refuse to turn away from their sin and continue to say I am too Holy and my practices will be sufficient. And this continues until this day @@psandbergnz
@@ramirochavera2437 , thanks for your reply, but you misunderstand the text. If the text referred to Jesus or the NT, then you should be able to point to some Christological evidence in the text indicating this. Can you do so? Do you find implied in the passage redemption through the blood of messiah or faith in messiah? That is the essence of Christianity, but where is it even hinted at there? The context of all the surrounding chapters is about the return of the Jews to Israel/Judah from exile, where generations of Jews had started to forget God's name. But God knows who His people are, and calls them back, as He reveals Himself to them once again. The obstinate people (verse 2) are the rebellious Jews who had brought God's wrath upon Israel, resulting in the Exile. But God's covenant with Israel is everlasting, so He does not abandon them to die out in exile, but saves a remnant to bring back. This remnant is the descendants of _Judah_ (verse 9), not Gentiles, and they will possess "my mountains". Sharon and the valley of Achor (verse 10) are cities of Israel. So the descendants of Judah (the Jews) inherit those lands again, whereas the former rebellious Jews have now died out. Christians do not inhabit those places - Jews do. It's all focused on Israel/Judah, not foreign lands (where the Gentiles live). God's "holy mountain" (verse 11) is Jerusalem. It's about the Jews, not the Gentiles. The Gentile nation referred to in verse 1 is where the Jews were scattered, and their knowledge of God had dissipated. But God does not forget them. WHERE IS THE CONTEXT FOR CHRISTIANITY IN THE PASSAGE?
Guys, remember every comment makes the video appear in more recommendations to more people. You can help saving people from Christianity by simply commenting, liking and sharing this video
If the Jewish law was truly salvific, Jews would be evangelizing with desperation and urgency. Now of course most Christians aren't evangelizing with the urgency and longsuffering as that of the apostles in the 1st century most unfortunately. But, never has there been a religion of such gatekeeping and pedigree as Judaism. I say this, and also I must say that to those who are unwilling to re-evaluate the Trinity as not being polytheist and pagan, you will likely really never be willing to think with even an iota of abstraction, depth of meaning, introspection. Do you even see the symbolic intricacy of Torah? Although I consider Moses to be the gold standard text among all religion as the true creed to monotheism. What do you think the manner for which God has conducted himself in relation to his creation has been? In the spirit, as God is outside of creation, the unmoved mover, Ancient of Days, coming into creation conveying his divine person through his Holy Ghost. Also incarnate fighting with your father Jacob, in visiting with Abraham with two of his angels. Is the a binitarian expression of our Lord what has been ministered unto us? Moreso, as the incarnation stands before Adam and Eve in the garden I know very well that I see the trinity in the Books of Moses. I see Christ the King. I see the divine person without any doubt or blaspheming, undeniably in the Spirit of the Lord. I believe God dictated every lick of the Torah, and providently guided the ministry of Moses and Aaron oh so deliberately. But God's true testament is decisive, will he have mercy, in the face of our grievous trespass? Will he redeem creation? Can we really be reconciled with the Holy and the Divine, with a simple forgive and forget? With a participation trophy? No in the blood of Jesus I repent and am washed, and reconciled. As per Jesus' insistence, His command, His offering. I mustn't any longer trespass, in Christ I can grow in grace for he has bore my burden, and I am new and being sanctified. In the only true mercy, and the only valid justification. I am in the deepest debt, I've been grafted back onto the tree of life, but at the highest and most incomprehensible cost. For David trusted and commended himself into the hands of God's mercy, in the face of danger, he was fortified in faith, does God not heed him? God destroys death. It happened in 33ad. @@abc_6
@@Michaelbrown-j4lGd Scattered Israel the Northern Tribes among the Heathen Nations and has long been with His Remnant Judah, the Jews, who He has long been refining, they are His Light to the Nations, Not the Heathen Nations to the Jews.
@@Michaelbrown-j4l As Scripture tells, Gd will make the Nations to Serve and go by His Firstborn Son Israel the Jews Leadership, the wealth of the Nations will be given to them and the Nations who refuse shall PERISH, just as He will make the children of their Oppressors go to them BENT OVER, just as He will make those who have Despised His Firstborn Son Israel the Jews like yourself to PROSTRATE THEMSELVES at the soles of their feet.
@@Michaelbrown-j4l As Jeremiah prophesied, the Gentiles will come to see that they have inherited only Lies, Emptiness in which there is nothing of any avail!
The critical component of this review is thinking and treating Paul as a "Christian or Catholic" teacher. Which is what THEY did to him. if he was a decorated pharisee taught by Gamaliel, why is there no consideration for his actual understanding of tanahk. He does have a mastery of torah and doesn't teach against any of the commandments or traditions. But the christians and catholics do. He obviously talking about alot of things that many didn't understand and felt it was worth getting beaten for his faith over and over again.. it says something. and Tov suggesting he's utterly unclean and a destroyer of torah is again, like he loves to do, a gross oversimplification and should be directed at Christianities later faults and not to Paul/Shaul.
I have been a Christian all my life because of my family. And because I believe in the holy Trinity. It wasn't unti started experiencing sleep paralysis at ten years old.. Is and suffered from the monic attacks for over twenty years.. I read the call on the name of jesus christ from pastor.. It took a while but the demons would get shaken whenever I would call on to his name... They would hate it!! Eventually the sleep Paralysis stopped... I don't just believe in jesus christ to be the son of god because of faith, god because The enemy hates him... Why would demons hate jesus??
@@peterzinya1: And you know that BECAUSE you've done exactly HOW MUCH ACTUAL research??!! You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!) as atonement for our sins. When God gave us His words to us at Mt. Sinai, He specifically told us that those words are ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) and that we are NOT to listen to ANY OTHER TEACHING than what is in those ETERNAL Hebrew scriptures. "Christianity" IS another teaching, therefore, we are NOT to follow what it says - God's orders! Therefore, "Christianity" absolutely did NOT come from God - besides which the "NT' is NOT scripture that was given to mankind by God. PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover) and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books "Let's Get Biblical - Why Doesn't Judaism Accept the Christian Messiah?", as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
15:35 (equal to 935 seconds to the time of my watching at 9:35 pm) "This is the way the Greco-Roman world thought, that there was grand mystery salvation." Another point to consider is the question of how to write and speak of things whose understanding is beyond our grasp. Philippians 3 13~3 15 "I may have yet to grasp it yet, but this I know, to give my heart to the Lord and move positively towards my heavenly reward." It's a lovely coincidence that the verse numbers center on Pi's presence. Images of Pi and Christ appeared within our home, leading to the discovery of a mapping of space and time that matches Einstein and Rosen's pragmatic and deterministic view of quantum science. The big surprise to everyone, is that this naturalistic, mechanical explanation matching Einstein also shouts out Christ Jesus. Nobody saw it coming. The world is gob-smacked.
I appreciate Rabbi’s teachings… my question is was the Coptic Orthodox Church actually founded around 42 AD? This was long before Paul’s writings and the rest of the New Testament authors. Is there any evidence or explanation of the Coptic Church teachings at that early date.
Doesn't Paul admit in Corinthians that scripturally-literate Jews will not accept the concept that the messiah was defeated by the enemies of the Israelites and returned from the dead rather than destroying the enemies of the Israelites?
Yes, and since He gave us His words at Mt. Sinai, for how He expects us to live, H expects us to SEEK OUT His Truth for ourselves, and not just accept what we've been taught all our lives!
I would like to hear the Rabbi speak of the times before Moses. To what source did the Jewish people look before the Torah? How about before the time of Noah? In those days were there any guidelines issued by G-d? Humanity has been around for a very long time. Why do religions seem to exist only in the recent past and present? What about it Reb? How did G-d interact with the people near to the beginning? Are we to believe Adam was turned loose to be on his own? Why did G-d wait so long to give us the law?
So before the revelation at Sinai, the tradition or sources were most likely oral transmitted by Abraham. The revelation at Sinai is the most important part of our Jewish history.
Just one problem with saying that, Paul's own testimony. His own experiences and his final fate. I find it impossible to comprehend a man creating a religion, based upon his persecution of said religion, choosing to embrace said religion, suffering the same persecution and being executed for practicing and preaching said religion. That just doesn't add up. But, then I'm fairly certain Paul, along with the other Apostles endured similar arguments and accusations, in their time. Peace be upon you.
What I want to know, or maybe not, is HOW MUCH does the VAtican know? do they know its fake? is the DaVinci code true? Did the Vatican and Knights Templar discover the truth and have very old writings that talk about the plans of apostles or early christians or Paul to "fake it"?
So paul said... "I became as a Jew for the Jews so as to gain the Jews" sounds like an actor, chameleon, and pretender not a Saint if any kind! Bless The Jewish Faith ✡️
Yes and when he saw Peter following this advice, he used the moment as an opportunity to call Peter out in public in order to make himself look good and gain more influence among the public by looking superior to "a so-called pillar of the church" as he says. He conman and a hypocrite and he even admits as much
To bro. Singer, pls. do read this Scriptures for your enlightenment: " To the messenger of assymbly at Smyrna, write, Thus says, The First and the Last, He who dead and lives. I know your affliction and poverty and the blasphemy from those who say their nefeshot are Jewish when they are not Jewish, but the congregation of HaSatan."( Revelation 2:8-9HRV). Et shem ישוע Yeshua Messiah benn- Elohim. Hallelu YAH Shalom
Do think that (Gen 16:7, Gen 17:12, and Deuteronomy 30:6) indicates that it is not just about the people of Abraham, at least not at this point in history.
How it came to be that writing about viewing other men as uncircumcised thus disqualified in a public venue without it being perceived as bizarre yet still relevant 2,000 years later continues to amaze me, how did they know each other was uncircumcised?? 👀
Paul spent the first part of his life vigorously opposing and trying to destroy the Jesus Messiah movement; but then he had an encounter with the resurrected Jesus. Paul went from being one of the greatest enemies of the church to being one of its greatest champions.
@@AshrafAnam you misunderstood the point of the resurrection. If Jesus claim to be the son of God why would the Father raise him from the dead? Jesus claim would be blasphemy worthy of destruction but if Jesus is who he claims to be and is without sin then it makes perfect sense that Jesus would be raised from the death as the old testament prophecies of a perfect holy substitute dieing in our place for the punishment we deserve had been fulfilled. So if Jesus was raised from the dead, it is the most theologically relevant fact in history
I don't believe Paul had that encounter with Jesus, it's a fantasy that fitted in with Paul's agenda. He's such a creepy figure, even when I was a kid in Sunday School something felt off about Paul.
At first Paul was persecuting Christians!! Then God had completely restored him!! What he was teaching was kinda like using boasting language as though he was so endowed!! However he was a good soul winner!! But the idea of going ahead of the Jews concerning the circumcision and commandments and teaching that he was more superior than those who are scholars and no there God!! You can say he was out of touch!! Remember in life everyone is always learning!! However, The best policy is not to become aggressive or disrespectful to someone who is very much learned in their holy book!! It's not our Job in life to quarrel or wrestle with others about what we think to be correct!! But be humble and learn to listen and understand our differences on things but remain peaceful and let things work themselves out!! Having a good attitude and perspective!
Rabbi, I recently listened to one of your podcasts regarding Paul. My personal opinion is this. The Greeks were basically beginning to accept the concept of Judaism and monotheism but they couldn’t accept the faith hook, line and sinker for a number of reasons. A big problem was circumcision. They objected to the disfigurement of the body. They didn’t like kashrut because they didn’t really want to change their diet and way of life. And then there is the commandment to keep the Sabbath as well As other commandments that are either difficult or unappealing. Paul couldn’t change Judaism to suit the Greeks but Christianity was new and more malleable. So he came up with a simple basic concept that God ( Jesus) died for your sins so it was no longer necessary to observe the commandments, or at least the ritualistic commandments as you pointed out. This isn’t particularly logical but the Greeks bought it and adopted Christianity. I am a secular Jew. I don’t know but maybe you wouldn’t even consider me a Jew but I was born of a Jewish mother so that makes me Jewish. Here’s the thing. I can understand the objection to circumcision. It seems barbaric and it is painful. It’s a sign of the covenant between God and the Jewish people yet it sounds like some kind of cult practice. A day of rest sounds pleasing but the rules of how to keep the Sabbath don’t make any sense in a modern world. One can’t drive. I am 72 and it’s a lot easier to drive than to walk but driving is work while walking isn’t. I could go on but I don’t think it’s necessary. I don’t know but my thinking on the ritualistic aspects seems more in line with the Christian’s than with Orthodox Jews. I don’t believe Jesus died for anybody’s sins but I do question the need to continue to blindly follow rituals. And also, considering all the atrocities in the world especially the many many committed in the name of religion I find it hard to believe there is a God. Would a living merciful God really permit such things to happen? Basically, my question is why should we continue to observe commandments pertaining to ritual?
1 Corinthians 15:12 Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?
Thank you for this video. One of the reasons I began to doubt Paul was his outrageous statements in Romans 9. In this verse, Paul slanders G-d, claiming that G-d creates people for the purpose of destruction....but before he does this, he makes the claim that G-d hated Esau while he was in his mother's womb. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't find evidence for this claim in the Hebrew Bible.
Paul talks about the Eucharist and the new Lord's Supper and the importance of believers drinking and eating Jesus's flesh and blood, , he is CREATING CATHOLOCISM. he is not teachign what Jesus taught nor what the old testament revelation from God to the Israelites was and taught.
In another twist, in the Book of Acts, Paul personally circumcises Timothy, a man half Greek half Jew, because Paul is going to introduce Timothy to the Jewish leaders of the church in Jerusalem and doesn't want to cause a scandal. We see a whole different Paul in Acts vs his letters.
Paul referred himself as, "of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee" and a learned student of Gamaliel. Paul passionately persecuted early Christians. Then, on the road to Damascus, he had an encounter with the risen Christ! It as both a commissioning and a conversion event. Only Christ can, in an instant, convert a man of Paul's standing to be His bondservant, even to death.
Even if all the world religions try their best to destroy christianity, Jesus had said that the gates of hades shall not prevail to destroy the church💪💪💪💪
Hear oh Israel the Lord our G-d the lord is one! Why do you practice polytheism? Don't be discouraged however as there is hope! I myself was in the Christian church for almost 30 years and saw the truth! It takes looking at Hebrew scriptures and as BEST you can reading them without a Christian interpretation but a Jewish one. Forget what you're believed ansld start with a clean slate. It is my personal opinion most Christians are scared to. They would rather continue in their polytheism, idolatry and be comfortable in their beliefs even if they are wrong. It's a humbling thing to admit you believe is 🐴 💩 decades I'm a Noahide now but hope to convert❤
1 Corinthians 9:20 doesn't say that Paul didn't fulfill the God's law, I guess. There are many places in the Gospel where Paul fulfilled commands of Torah.
*Jesus's first followers were Torah observant Jews. They simply thought of Jesus as the messiah, not 'God in the flesh'. This is why Raban Gamliel told all not to harm them.. they may have been mistaken, but that does not make them to be idolators.* *Paul's story about persecuting Christians is made up. The high priest was a Saddicee while Paul says he himself was a pharisee. Those sects never worked together and the high priest didn't have any authority in Damascus just as France doesn't have any authority in Turkey!* *Paul was a self proclaimed bonified liar.*
@pazrahamim9220 Yes. And the Apostle Paul remained a faithful and devout Jew throughout his entire life, including after he accepted Yeshua as Messiah.
@@PazPinhasRahamim9220 I refer you to the book of Acts of the Apostles, particularly the latter chapters. I also refer you to Paul's epistles to Timothy.
You've convinced me I need to learn the Hebrew language. In the meantime, could you or someone from your program recommend an English Hebrew Bible that hasn't been Christianized? Peace to you, and thank you!
Paul opposing Peter to his face didn’t mean him going against Peter on everything. That passage is clearly about Paul CORRECTING Peter for he was mistaken in that one particular scenario. The apostles knew that they weren’t infallible hence there were many recorded instances of them debating and correcting one another on Christ’s doctrines. Paul himself consulted the Jerusalem apostles when he was questioning his own path in the gospel truth-Galatians 2:2. He didn’t go against the gospel preached to the Jews. The Jerusalem apostles didn’t preach circumcision. They met to discuss the issue that was brought on by erroneous Jewish Christians to instigate controversy among the gentile churches. All the apostles agreed on the doctrine regarding circumcision that after the assembly Peter along with the other Jerusalem apostles, sent emissaries with Paul back to the gentiles with a letter that clearly stated what was required for their faith and it did not include circumcision-Acts 15:28… There is no such thing as Paul’s gospel. Many times he explained what he preached wasn’t his own. It would be hard to understand for someone who hadn’t grown in knowledge. Paul in the New Testament arguably had more knowledge about what freedom through faith meant compared to Peter. So much so that Peter even had to be reminded what the new covenant teaching was about eating unclean meats in Acts 10:15. Even then it didn’t mean that they were against each other. Paul was just given more knowledge according to the spirit as he clearly demonstrated in 1 Corinthians 8:8…
Paul rebuked Peter for doing the same thing that he himself does. Paul saw an opportunity to gain power over what he calls "a so-called pillar of the church" (James, Peter, etc. who Paul disliked). He didn't even know Jesus, so his gospel is exactly "his" gospel
@@RealAmericanSicko I’m compelled to respond immediately and strongly for what you have said were all speculations. I don’t know anything in scripture to support your statements unless you care to share it with us. Those are strong statements about Paul disliking Peter and preaching his own gospel to both, I strongly disagree. The idea that the apostles are divided and conniving against one another is malicious. Even though the 12 apostles to the Jews and the 2 to the gentiles each had their own ministries, they were one in Christ by ALL means. Evidenced in 2 Peter 3:16 with Peter advocating for Paul and 1 Cor 1:12 - 13 with Paul advocating for unity in Christ. You are wrong about Paul. It’s your word against his. GALATIANS 1:12.
@@OpieApproved Paul admits that he never knew Jesus. That wasn't speculation. Peter didn't write anything in the New Testament, he was a poor, illiterate Jewish fisherman who spoke Aramaic from Galilee. Unless you mean to speculate that he somehow learned how to write and read Greek. Now about your point on Paul's call for unity-this is the kind of thing that critical scholars see as an issue with Paul. In one breath he will call for unity, yet in another he will say that the original disciples of the historical Jesus (James, Peter, Simon, etc) are "so-called pillars of the church" and "what they are means nothing to me" and "I worked harder than any of them." When you read Paul's letters without rose-colored glasses, he is clearly someone who was or struggled with toxic narcissistic behaviors and sentiments. he "becomes all things to all people" (which is unethical, manipulative, and non-Jewish) yet rebukes Peter for doing the same thing. He also rebuked Peter *publicly*, when Paul himself told his followers to rebuke someone privately at first. his interpretation of the Hebrew Bible is contradictory and dishonest, taking passages out of context just to suit his rhetoric and propaganda.
@@RealAmericanSicko Are we reading the same book? Paul admits he never knew Jesus? In what epistle? In contrary, look up 1 Corinthians 15:7-8. And while you’re at it examine 1 Cor 15:11 so what he said about him “working harder than all of them” in 1 Cor 15:10 would make sense. Your comprehension is rather incomplete. You’re citing parts of a verse that are comparative in nature and not matter-of-fact. They were in support of THE message and not the message themselves. I don’t wear any glasses when I’m reading scriptures. I read them for their message. I scrutinize them. I cross reference them. I evaluate their truth. It’s how I test the spirit in them as was advised by the apostles. It took me a while to agree with Paul because like what Peter said a lot of his writings were difficult to understand for anyone who’s young in knowledge. You have so many mistaken statements that can each be corrected according to scriptures but to save time I picked the most obvious ones like your statement about Peter not writing anything in the NT. I just cited his 2nd epistle in my previous response. But for your enrichment here are proofs: 1 Peter 1:1, 2 Peter 1:1.
@@OpieApproved 1 Corinthians is Paul claiming that the *resurrected* Jesus appeared to him (which may have been true-he could have had a dream or some other spiritual experience. It is irrelevant to the Hebrew Bible because if anyone for any reason claims that anyone but YHVH is God, then it is idolatry and is therefore forbidden to the Israelites / Jews). 1 Cor 15 is not proof that Paul knew Jesus prior to his death. I could tell you to look up Bart Ehrman, Richard Carrier, Dennis McDonald, etc., but the top issue that Christians have in seeing the truth about Paul is that you all take him at his word on everything. You believe he was a Pharisee because he says so. You believe he rebuked Peter for good reasons because he says so. But the story doesn't add up when you look at the details. And Paul contradicts himself a lot because he was willing to take verses from the Hebrew Bible out of context and change their meaning to suit his needs and his message. The original disciples of Jesus were Jews from Galilee and they didn't consider Paul a legitimate apostle (keep in mind that when they looked for Judas' replacement in the Book of Acts, they looked for someone who was with them "since the baptism of John". Paul didn't meet the criteria)
888th comment! Today saw 5:39 on a license plate in front of me. A firetruck appears lights and sirens flashing from the right and crosses us to our left. 935HUA is responding to our emergencies (as read from right to left). And from left to right (5 39) he is reminding us to 8ive 8od 8lory because after all, he is the God that gives us breath and breath to every little quantum wave in the universe. His presence lies at the heart of all 539eNeRATioN (regeneration).
Never heard of "Cameron Vale", or that movie, but...OK! I just looked it up on IMDB. The movie exists (1981), but there's no "Cameron Vale" listed in the credits. He is listed on IMDB for a different movie, but his profile has no information.
I hadn't ever considered that the characters of the so called NT were made up! I do know the whole virgin birth thing predates Christianity! Egypt and ancient Babylonia had similar stories so I should have considered that.
@@susanlett9632 there is no evidence outside the Bible that Paul existed. As for Jesus, the earliest references outside the Bible to his existence are by Tacitus, Suetonius and Pliny the Younger, who all knew each other and were obviously Roman elites whose work is designed to historicize the Christian movement. For example, Suetonius mentions that Emperor Claudius exiled Jews who were causing riots in Rome because of "the instigator Chrestus.". Christ is deliberately misspelled by Suetonius. These are very crafty authors. Read Pliny's letter to Trajan. Pliny was instrumental in historicizing the early Church, which was invented by Roman elites to supercede Judaism. The Romans invaded Judea after the Greeks did, and they needed to create an Anti Semitic religion to compete with Judaism, which was spreading through the empire and opposed slavery, taxation and worship of Caesar as God.
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms If we can only know G-d through being bestowed with the Holy Spirit than we do not have free choice. Regarding knowing Moses and his Torah are true; G-d reveled himself directly to the Israelites. He also directly showed them that Moses is his messenger. (G-d existence was not proved based on miracles and Moses status as a prophet was not proved based on miracles. G-ds commandments taught by Moses were not proven to be from G-d through miracles.) Revelation happened to 600,000 plus ppl. These ppl were commanded to tell their children exactly what they saw. As Deuteronomy 4 says: they saw no image and only heard G-ds voice. This is what they are commanded to pass down to their children. This is how they know G-d. (Deuteronomy 13 (and last verse in 12 from Christian bibles) states that if an individual claims to be a messenger from G-d and even performs a sign (miracle) yet he either adds or removes laws or tells you to follow a G-d we do not know - he is a false prophet) The 600,000 plus ppl passed down to their children all that they saw and that Moses taught to them. The best generation who did not witness revelation themselves had ample witnesses that it was true. They in tune passed it to the next generation and so on. Each generations multiple sources were witness to the previous generations teachings. There were also leaders who insured that the teachings were passed down and were responsible that all the information was completely taught to the successor. (Eventually the teachings that were passed down and taught in schools was recorded into the mishna and then the teachings in the mishna were recorded into the Talmud) In very short; In Judaism we have our mesorah (our passed down teachings starting straight from Moses) that affirms our faith and beliefs and knowledge of G-d and his commandments. Perhaps as an individual who subscribes to a belief and teachings like the New Testament that is not meant for a specific ppl this concept is hard to understand. Have a good day
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms one last thing; In Judaism teaching the scriptures and the mesorah is paramount. A parent’s obligation to teach their child everything. From a to z. Either directly or through a teachers (which they obviously make sure it’s someone reliable) In Judaism studying and understanding G-d and his commandments is number one. It comes before secular education. And is taken extremely seriously. There is also the concept of studying for the sake of studying (as opposed to for the sake of knowing and doing ) There are many individuals who dedicate their life to studying the Torah. This so considered praiseworthy and many ppl will help support them financially.
Question Rabbi I am not A Jew so that I may ask the right question. Wasn’t there a Rabbi that Wrote a Book that had the Messiah Identified but, the book was not to be released for about 8-10 years after his death.?I believe he was around 104 when he died. I am sorry I don’t remember his name.
Paul pointed out that 430 years prior to Israel and the Law, the Word preached the Gospel To Abram and Abram was saved by faith alone, without works. This is not an invention, it is in Genesis. (Genesis 15/Galatians 3:7-19) Most Christians don't even understand this and that Judaism has Christian roots not the other way around.
Great show!👍 Does anyone have an idea of what scriptures Paul referred to, in 1 Corinthians, when saying Jesus would be crucified n resurrect 3 days later??
Here is the real truth about Paul. Throughout the Torah and the prophets WE KNOW that Judaism accepts converts from those of the nations who come to faith in the One and ONLY Creator of Heaven and Earth. Our prophet Ezekiel in Chapter 47:22-23 laid out the words of YKVK so well that there can be no confusion that everyone who comes to faith in YKVK becomes as the native-born Israelite WITH INHERITANCE within the tribe he dwells with. Did Paul obey this command of YKVK? No. Ask yourself why Paul had to make a long trip out of Israel to Damascus to hunt down and kill Jews who believed Yeshua was the Messiah? Weren't there enough Jews who followed Yeshua in Israel he could kill??? If you are thinking something doesn't add up here you are thinking correctly. Believing someone is the promised Messiah of Israel is no sin, and certainly not an offense punishable by death according to Torah. What the hell was this Paul actually doing? [ to be continued ]
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms Just to let you know, I respect your right to free speech, and in my right to free speech I say to you that I do not engage the unbeliever as it serves no purpose.
I think the critical document for understanding non Paulines is the Didache fragment. It shows a unitarian "Christianity" that predates the Pauline Binitarian and Trinitarian variants. God the Father alone is supreme, Jesus is an exalted servant, a prophet like David. The cup of wine and the breaking of bread was obviously a variation on the Sabbath Meal with messianic apocalyptic influence. The actual disciples were spreading their understanding of Judaism to both Jews and non Jews. Then Paul came into the picture and everything went off the rails.
How do you know that the Old Testament isnt changed.I am a believing Christian myself and believe in the Old Testament as the revealed word of God.But my point is that the same argument can be made about the old Testament itself
Thanks for this great video. It makes me think about why Jews hated Paul so much. The question is why? Ironically, you mentioned how people in the past died and they didn't know why. Medicine got better, but it takes time. The Gospel is also something that was revealed through time. Paul became Christian after Jesus resurrection, therefore, he was no longer under the Law. He was under the Grace of my Lord Jesus. Paul, just like Jesus, was persecuted by Jews. E.g. "They promised that they would not eat or drink anything until they killed him. 13More than 40 men took part in this plan." Don't get me wrong, I love the Jews. I just see that Paul was hated in the past because he was preaching the salvation through Jesus Christ.
When the *TWO WITNESSES* arrive for the sake of calling out the 144,000 (12,000 from 12 tribes of Israel) they will be preaching the SAME *Gospel* that Paul preached. Lucifer tends to bring about *false* prophets, and teachers BEFORE the Genuine comes on the scene, for the sake of misrepresenting that which is to come. Still, God has the POWER to meet the challenge!!!!
So Paul, a jew, established christianity, so therefore christianity is a deception. so why are we criticising christian's delusion, when they have been consistently entrapped? This makes no sense to me.
I just don't follow the significance of Rabbi Singer's criticism of Paul's take on Jesus' resurrection (I Corinthians 15:3-9). The claim is that Paul was a maverick for making up "his own unique version of Christianity" by suggesting Jesus rose in spirit, contradicting the gospel narratives that Jesus rose in physical body! In I Corinthians 15:3-9 Paul speaks of Jesus' physical death and burial, but then he states Jesus afterward "appeared" to the disciples, then 500 others, then to Paul himself, the former appearing to agree perfectly with the gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John). If you read further down (I Corinthians 15:12-17), Paul repeatedly speaks of the Jesus being "raised from the dead," so I just don't understand the contradiction the Rabbi is trying to make? If Jesus appeared to the disciples, 500 others, and Paul himself, it seems he is referring to a physical reality that can be seen! But to be clear, whether the resurrected body is spiritual or physical (probably both), the bible is clear in the book of Revelation 21:3-4: "And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, 'Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God himself will be among them, and he will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away." As an aside, the Old Testament also alludes to this in Isaiah 35. Verse 10 reads: "And the ransomed of the Lord will return and come with joyful shouting to Zion, with everlasting joy upon their heads. They will find gladness and joy, and sorrow and sighing will flee away!"
The Canaanite Woman as well she even ask Jesus to help with lower self and ended up saying to her "be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.” But it switches up alot it had demon etc. Go over this when you can .
1 Corinthians 11:23-26 directly quotes Jesus in saying to break the bread and drink the wine..so that just doubly contradicted you. He DID quote Jesus, and the only thing found in 1 Cor. 11 re. the Lord's Supper that you find objectionable was direct quote from Jesus' LIFE here..and it was Jesus who instituted it, Paul merely repeated it, Paul did not invent it. Most of us Christians believe Jesus' words re. the Lord's supper are spiritually symbolic, not literal. You are referring to the beliefs of the false unbiblical Catholic church who preach what Timothy calls in NT "doctrines of demons", such as forbidding marriage (i.e. of priests, and we all know how much damage and corruption that caused).. The Apostle Paul also said in Galatians 3:24 "Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith." So yes the law meant MORE than merely types and shadows. The New Testament regularly refers to New Testament writings as "scripture". It is OUR Scripture, in addition to the Hebrew Bible. You will just have to get over your offense lol..we would be offended with your attitude toward us and our beliefs if we didn't love you so much!!🤗❤❤ Paul is not LYING, he is re-interpreting passages of the Hebrew Bible in the context of his Christian beliefs. He clearly believed it meant something more for the AD context. Paul did believe in what Jesus taught, which was REPENTANCE for sins, so yes it IS New Testament beliefs to turn from transgression/sin, thru repentance and then thru power of the Holy Spirit. If you believe in/agree with throwing the apostle Paul in prison, do you believe in throwing Christians in prison too?
09:40 - Incorrect. The physical world is tainted by the flawed material world, which encompasses man-made constructs like the lord in the Old Testament. Distinguishing between the material and physical realms is crucial. Ideally, the material world should be guided by truth, leading to eternal identities, but in reality, false beliefs, such as the fear of God or the idea of God as a Lord, have a significant influence. The Truth manifested within the material narrative through the character of Jesus, employing the very tool that Satan used to divert us from the truth. While the Old Testament represents the material world, the Truth entered it to expose its deceptions and reveal the path to redemption and enlightenment.
Your hero caused the Jews to be slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humbled, the Torah to be altered, and the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord.
Paul was a latecomer to the Christian movement. Paul spent the first part of his life vigorously opposing and trying to destroy the church and then he converted to the Jesus Messiah movement. Paul went from being one of the greatest enemies of the church to being one of the greatest champions of the church.
@user-cw3ox2nn5t I suggest you start by reading Paul's own epistles. I suggest you then read Acts of the Apostles. I suggest you then read the writings of the Nicean Fathers. I suggest you then read one of the many respected works, known as Systematic Theological Works.
The word in Tankah Jewish scripture is not fulfilled by Paul changing the word of God. Example 1 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining that the Hebrew word seed in Scripture is like the English word sheep to show how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed in Galatians 3:16 that the Hebrew word seed in scripture (Torah Genesis 17:7 and Genesis 22:18) means one person and therefore must be about Jesus because if it was about more than one person Scripture would have used the word seeds (however in Hebrew the word seeds does not exist meaning “seeds” never appears in Hebrew scripture). The reasoning of Paul is the same as someone claiming that the English word sheep means one sheep because if it was about more than one sheep then the word used would be sheeps. (The word sheeps does not exist in English like the word seeds does not exist in Hebrew). God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed. . Example 2 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed in 1 Corinthians 9:9 - 10 that the commandment in Torah Deuteronomy 25:4 “do not muzzle an ox” is really about humans and not animals. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed. . Example 3 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul confirms that Jesus was not resurrected in 1 Corinthians 15:35 and 1 Corinthians 15:44 where Paul claims that the resurrected come in a spiritual body however three days after the crucifixion Jesus showed that his body was a physical body and not a spiritual body in Gospel of John 20:17 where Jesus confirms he has not yet died “I have not yet ascended to the Father (God)” meaning the life of Jesus was saved with sleep on the cross in the same way God saved others who were sleeping in Gospel of Mark 5:39, Gospel of Matthew 9:24, Gospel of Luke 8:52 and Gospel of Luke 8:54 - 8:55. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed. . Example 4 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed the sacrifice of Jesus took away the sins of the world and therefore Jesus removed animal sacrifices. God tells us that when the Temple that is described in Ezekiel chapters 40 to 47 is constructed it will include the animal sacrificial system as it did in the Solomon Temple (the first temple) and the Herod Temple (the second temple) and that in the Ezekiel temple (the third temple) the messiah will bring sacrifices for himself and for the people. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed. . Example 5 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed the anointed messiah is both a King and a High priest in Hebrews 4:14. An anointed messiah king descends biologically from David however an anointed messiah High priest descends biologically from Aaron meaning the anointed messiah king cannot descend from both David and Aaron meaning an anointed messiah king cannot do the duties of an anointed messiah High priest. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed.
Paul taught the church how to change the word of God. The word of God is not fulfilled by wrong Christian translations of Tanakh Jewish scripture. Example 1 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians understand that Psalm 22 mentions the lion three times in the Hebrew scripture and in most Christian translations but was wrongly translated in the Christian produced Septuagint Bible in Psalm 22:16 as “they pierced my hands and my feet” instead of the Hebrew Psalm 22:17 “like a lion they (my enemies, the enemies of King David) are at my hands and my feet.” The lion and the animals mentioned in Psalm 22 represent the enemies of King David. . Example 2 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians by explaining Psalm 40:6 in a Christian Bible (which is Psalm 40:7 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture) is not about Jesus because the Hebrew words “My ears you have opened” were wrongly replaced with the Greek words “A body you have prepared for me.” . Example 3 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians understand why Psalm 110:1 in Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about Jesus is by explaining that after messiah King David said “My God my God why have you forsaken me” in Psalm 22 then God revealed through Prophet Nathan in Psalm 110:1 “My Lord (God) said to my lord (messiah King David)” words that show God has not forsaken the messiah King David. . Example 4 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining Isaiah 7:14 in Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about Jesus because the Hebrew word young women in Isaiah 7:14 was wrongly translated as Virgin. . Example 5 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that the child Hezekiah named mighty God who “has been born” in Isaiah 9:5 in the Tanakh Jewish Bible was made into Jesus by writing “shall be born” in Isaiah 9:6 in Christian produced bibles. . Example 6 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that Isaiah 53 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about Jesus but is an explanation of the past and present and future of the children of Israel. . Example 7 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that the New Covenant in Jeremiah chapter 31 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about the New Testament Bible but is the confirming and strengthening of the first everlasting covenant with a new promise that in the end of days the law Torah Taurat will be put in the human heart permanently meaning in the end of days which are the days of God no human will intentionally rebel against God. . Example 8 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that the son in Isaiah 7:14 is not Jesus but is the son of Prophet Isaiah. . Example 9 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians by explaining that Zechariah 12:10 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about the death of Jesus by crucifixion but about how a loved one who is killed with a sword in the battle between Israel and Gog will move all Israel to remember God and this will bring the defeat of Gog and will bring the messianic age.
Paul is not the word of God. See 1. Report card on the Apostle Paul: Pass or fail? See 2. Why did Paul lie about his mysterious revelations? Rabbi Tovia Singer responds. See 3. Paul corrupted the Hebrew Scriptures and could not have been a Pharisee, explains Rabbi Tovia Singer. See 4. Was Paul a Rabbi, an ignoramus, or a charlatan? Rabbi Tovia Singer responds. See 5. Hebrews contains the most outlandish assault on Judaism of any book in the NT. Rabbi Tovia Singer. See 6. Faith vs Works! Paul corrupted the Jewish Scriptures, explains Rabbi Tovia Singer. See 7. In the name of God! Rabbi Tovia Singer exposes Paul in powerful interview.
Mysteria in Greek mean a secret ritual that is open to a limited set of people and about wich is forbidden to communicate to other people. It is evident that Paul uses this term in a very different meaning.
Hi, I would have to question Tovia's statement that the Gospels were written 20 - 30 or even 40 years after Paul's writings - because the last Book of the New Testament was written Just prior to Mid 66 AD. The Wikipedia article titled, 'Book of Revelation' wrongly dates the book of Revelation to having been written in the Emperor Domitian's time or around 81-96 AD as this excerpt of the intro shows: "The author names himself as simply "John" in the text, but his precise identity remains a point of academic debate. Second-century Christian writers such as Papias of Hierapolis, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Melito of Sardis, Clement of Alexandria, and the author of the Muratorian fragment identify John the Apostle as the "John" of Revelation.[5][6] Modern scholarship generally takes a different view,[7] with many considering that nothing can be known about the author except that he was a Christian prophet.[8] Modern theological scholars characterize the Book of Revelation's author as "John of Patmos". The bulk of traditional sources date the book to the reign of the Roman emperor Domitian (AD 81-96), which evidence tends to confirm.[9][d]" The Actual INTERNAL Evidence within the book of Revelation does emphatically NOT tend to confirm the 81-98 AD dating by secular scholars Nor their completely spurious 'Unknown' John as the Author. Part of the problem with misinterpretation of numerous passages in the texts - of both Old and New testaments - especially with regard to the flow of prophetic narratives - is the introduction to all bibles, by one of two Roman Catholic Cardinals in the 1200's AD of the completely 'arbitrary' Chapter numbering system which even Scholars and critics state is 'incoherent' in places - in this Wikipedia article, Titled; 'Chapters and verses of the bible' under the heading, 'Christian versions' as follows: "Cardinal Hugo de Sancto Caro is often given credit for first dividing the Latin Vulgate into chapters in the real sense, but it is the arrangement of his contemporary and fellow cardinal Stephen Langton who in 1205 created the chapter divisions which are used today. They were then inserted into Greek manuscripts of the New Testament in the 16th century. Robert Estienne (Robert Stephanus) was the first to number the verses within each chapter, his verse numbers entering printed editions in 1551 (New Testament) and 1553 (Hebrew Bible).[25] The division of the Bible into chapters and verses has received criticism from some traditionalists and modern scholars. Critics state that the text is often divided in an incoherent way, or at inappropriate rhetorical points, and that it encourages citing passages out of context. Nevertheless, the chapter and verse numbers have become indispensable as technical references for Bible study." ---- Indeed, the numbering systems are or have become indispensable for finding and quoting various texts - however- and herein lies the problem regarding two of the most important books of the bible having been dated to the wrong eras in which the internal evidence shows they were actually written in - most notably the 'Book of Daniel' erroneously dated by scholars to Antiochus IV Epiphanes' era of between 176 - 174 BCE and the Book of Revelation to a much later time than the INTERNAL EVIDENCE of the book of Revelation itself shows in chapter 1 and the 'small book' prophecy of Revelation 10:8 through to its end in 11:2 - where a new prophecy for our modern age begins at Revelation 11:3 through to 11:18 showing the exact timing of the Resurrection of the saints from verses 13-18 at the sounding of the 7th or 'last trump', i.e. Revelation 11:15 - just as Paul taught in 1 Corinthians 15:51-53 & 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17. The True - internal Dating - of the book of Revelation to Between 65 and Mid 66 AD as follows, below, i.e, Just BEFORE Vespasian and Titus' Military campaigns that began in mid 66 AD and carried through to the Second Temple and Jerusalem's destruction over a period of 3 1/2 years to 70 AD: Revelation 10:8-11:2's 'small book' prophecy in its entirety - but without the arbitrary and faulty chapter numbering system which also screws up the verse numbering system in many biblical prophecies - not the least of which is Daniel 11:40-45 thought to be 'inaccurate' prophecy by secular scholars in Wikipedia's article titled, 'Book of Daniel'. "And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth. And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey. And I took the little book out of the angel's hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter. And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings. And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city SHALL they tread under foot forty and two months." Note the future Tense used in the last verse of the - small book - prophecy above, because in Revelation 1:1-3 and 1:11 and 1:19 John is not only commanded to write everything he sees in the present and his future [1:19] in a book [1:11] because 'the time was at hand' [1:3] for the destruction of the second temple to take place [Matthew 23:33 through to 24:26] But to Send that Book to the 7 Asia minor churches still extant at that time - BEFORE THE TEMPLE was destroyed. The 'abomination of Desolation' Matthew 24:15 & Mark 13:14 was actually Vespasian's Roman Army standing where it ought not to stand, i.e. in the 2nd temple grounds as the 9th chapter 70 weeks prophecy of Daniel foretold from Daniel 9:24-27. In Revelation 11:2 Jesus apostle John the actual writer/author of Revelation - emphatically does NOT record the destruction of the second Temple as he was commanded to do in Revelation 1:19. ------ Just as the scholars are completely wrong about the Dating of the book of Revelation to 81-96 AD when It was completed and sent to Asia minor churches before Mid 66 AD - the secular scholars are also completely wrong about Dating Daniel to 200 BCE or Antiochus IV Epiphanes' era of between 176 and 174 BCE, ironically. on the assumption that Daniel 11:40-45 was a prophecy about Antiochus' Military campaigns and death - When it is perfectly Accurate Prophecy covering Vespasian and Titus' military campaigns and Vespasian's Death instead. Refer to the Wikipedia article Titled, 'Book of Daniel' under the intro and Subheadings of Historical Background, Development, Authorship and Dating for relevant details of the completely wrong assumptions about the book of Daniel - all based in Daniel 11:45 supposedly being Antiochus' Death When the Vespasian article at wikipedia under the subheading, 'Death' shows very clearly Vespasian did indeed died of natural causes as Daniel 11:45 said he would, i.e. "And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him." ---- So Revelation being the last book of the Hebrew/English bible written - therefore shows ALL the other gospel books, including Paul's writings - were written before mid 66 AD also. 🙃
As-salamu aleijkum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu. I have a question about the circumcision. I know (now) that also Muslims does it, but I haven't seen it mentioned in the Qur'an and my current opinion if that's the correct word here for it is, that it was done hygiene reasons in old times when it wasn't so easy to take care of your hygiene. Could you give more insight about this from Jewish perspective, because I believe that it may come from there or was it something what people did in that area (like was it just a habit of that time when there wasn't running water and showers "everywhere". Also I think that modern knowledge says that everything in human body has a meaning example eyelashes protect your eyes and foreskin also protect your thing from something or was it given to men just so it can be "cut" off? Thank you and Barak Allahu fikum 🤲🏻
Jews are commanded to circumcise all males on the eighth day after their birth in Leviticus 12:3. Since the descendants of Keturah became intermingled with the descendants of Ishmael, all of them are obligated to circumcise their male children on the eighth day. However, the children of Keturah are not liable to punishment by a court for not observing this commandment, since it is not part of the Seven Noahide Commandments.
Dear fellow muslim, wa alaikumassalam, Most of the day to day laws of islam is described very clearly in the sahih/ authentic hadith of Prophet. And circumcision of a baby boy is compulsary/ fard per all sahih hadith. And yes, this wass follwed by all islamic prophets , at all times
@@LA-ws7gx Thank you for your answer. I have been Muslim now about two and half months and I have read (Finnish) Quran only once from cover to cover and One book about prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) life. So I don't know much these things. I don't know are there that many Hadith written in Finnish (my mother tongue). I need to check what I can find in English I think. Barak Allahu fikum 🤲🏻
@@stefanhenneken5415I hope there are mosques nearby where you are , they will welcome with all the love, and answer any questions on daily life in Islam. May Allah keep you Iman strong❤
you say Pauls audience was non jews, but he was always speaking in the synagogues of the cities he traveled to; i would also like to say ive always had problems with the way old testament scriptures seemed to be taken out of context by new testament writers. what was the intended meaning of a verse was it translated correctly etc.Its all very frustrating when your just trying to honor and respect GOD
On the contrary. Paul as an Orthodox Jew will unlikely do such changes unless he experienced something supernaturally good, moving and life-changing event personally with someone Divine like Jesus telling him to do so 🙏✝️ . And by the way the correct term is abrogation because he didn't corrupted anything he just debunked the Jews of their hypocrisy of understanding the laws. 💯✔️👍
have a lot of respect for Jewish scholars and rabbis like Tovia. We don't take enough time to hear from them, their point of view, enough.
This is great. Thank you for all you do! We are so blessed to have you!
Of course if he as a blessing to you what happened to Nova Festival our young boys and girls there was idol worship front of the Buddhist status dancing singing like Mount sinai. Where was your great rabbai tovia. Hope he was sleeping at that time.
Never seen or heard anyone who is so underrated as Rabbi Singer...It's so comforting to have a Defender of Jewish Thinking...
Isaiah 59:20 NIV
“The Redeemer will come to Zion, to those in Jacob who repent of their sins,” declares the Lord.
So, who is Redeemer?
Second coming, after a good portion of Jacob has understood who the redeemer is.
@@SONofGOD..Hashem is our Redeemer!
See. The Second Coming of Jesus and other Church Fabrications! - Rabbi Tovia Singer.
@@SONofGOD..he’s dead you can’t bring that guy to life on his own
Thank you, Tovia for all your teaching and all your your incredible research and study of the scriptures and the christian bible so as to thoroughly teach us the truth ..of the only true G-d …you have had a profound influence over my understanding of the scriptures and how to live as a non-jew following Judaism..forsaking Christianity and all the emotional attachments to it and most of all repenting of following a false god….and false religion even though it was comforting and I thought it was true…but the Torah cannot lie..it was a slow process for me but very thorough one..I pray for your safety in Israel and healing for your people and your land..
The ONE TRUE GOD *IS* The INVISIBLE Spirit which took on a body of flesh to become a Saviour for lost humanity.
IN CHRIST there is *neither* Jew not Gentile...
I thought you would appreciate this anecdote from Rav Schachter. Members of the Jewish community came to Rabbeinu Tam one of the foremost Tosephists, complaining that Christians were ‘teasing’ them with the Torah itself.
They claimed that the Torah itself supported the notion of the trinity from the first three letters, ‘beis’, ‘reish’, and ‘aleph’ which they said stood for ben,the son, ruach, the spirit, and av, the father.
Rabbeinu Tam took a moment and then responded. “Tell them that the next three letters are ‘shin’, ‘yud’, and ‘taf’. This he countered stand for ‘sheker’ falsehood, ‘Yeshu’, ‘tihiye’. Jesus is false.
His point, just as what I have just said based on a few letters, is nonsense, so, their claims are equally ridiculous.
Thanks!
Thank G-d for rabbi Singer exposing the Pagan Idolatry of the Christian faith. Surrendering to a man, made from flesh is unbearable and unacceptable.
The Christians try to weasel around this by saying that Jesus was literally God incarnate! Well that's another deal breaker for Christianity.
@@bt-lt4osThat's not what that verse says at all. It doesn't tell us to submit to a man at all.
@@bt-lt4os: NOWHERE does that verse mention the name of the "Jesus" character, so you can't 'shoehorn' it in there where it doesn't belong! God specifically told us NOT to add or subtract from His ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) words! Since you have never learned from the Orthodox Rabbis, as commanded by God in Deut. 17:8-11, you have NO clue what this verse ACTUALLY means!
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES (i.e. NO "NT") were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, and that the ENTIRETY of the Hebrew scriptures, i.e. TANACH, that consists of the Torah, the Prophets and the Writings (i.e. Psalms, Proverbs, etc.) were given to Moses at Mt. Sinai. Also given to Moses at that time, was the Talmud, which is the explanations and details of the Tanach, without which it is impossible to understand the words given to Moses. Christianity foolishly REJECTS the Talmud, which resulted in their bastardization of God's ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) words, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God ACTUALLY said to us at Mt. Sinai, which resulted in the false, pagan, man-made, blasphemous religion of "Christianity", that preaches AGAINST what God said to us there.
PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover) and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books "Let's Get Biblical - Why Doesn't Judaism Accept the Christian Messiah?", as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
@@emprah387: You apparently know zero about the Hebrew scriptures, because you haven't learned from the Orthodox Rabbis, as commanded by God in Deut. 17:8-11. In the absence of the Temple, the Rabbis are our spiritual teachers, since they (and ONLY THEY!!) have been studying the original Hebrew scriptures, all the way back to Mt. Sinai, something Christianity and Islam REFUSED to do, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God said to us there.
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NO FURTHER SCRIPTURES (i.e. NO "NT" and NO "Quran") were given to mankind by God AFTER Mt. Sinai, and that the ENTIRETY of the Hebrew scriptures, i.e. TANACH, that consists of the Torah, the Prophets and the Writings (i.e. Psalms, Proverbs, etc.) were given to Moses at Mt. Sinai. Also given to Moses at that time, was the Talmud, which is the explanations and details of the Tanach, without which it is impossible to understand the words given to Moses. Christianity (and Islam) foolishly REJECTS the Talmud, which resulted in their bastardization of God's ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) words, leaving them in profound darkness as to what God ACTUALLY said to us at Mt. Sinai, which resulted in the false, pagan, man-made, blasphemous religion of "Christianity" (and later, Islam, which is not pagan, like Christianity), that preaches AGAINST what God said to us there.
PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover) and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books "Let's Get Biblical - Why Doesn't Judaism Accept the Christian Messiah?", as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
@edwardmiessner6502 you should pay attention to how demons view Jesus.
Another great talk. Thank you Host and Rabbi Tovia Singer. Baruch HaShem!
The Jewish people have endured so much hatred for many centuries all over the world, yet Jewish people in general are very loving and kind. God bless the Jewish people and Israel.
I've met a few Jews who were not very good people. Doesnt matter if youre a jew christian or muslim. Youre either a dick or your not.
How did they stab them
But WHY? I guess because of NO REASON AT ALL. From Egyptians to Persians to Romans to turks to English to almost everywhere they have been to. And just for no reason at all.
Paul was more than a "bad faith actor." As you, Rabbi, have pointed out (and I can show anyone many more examples right there, screaming out at you, in his letters) Paul was a prodigious liar. I was stunned one day to hear a pastor tell his congregation that Paul was the most morally upright person who has ever lived. Stunned, I tell you! A deep dive into the NT writings plainly reveals what a vile person Paul was. And no one with any common sense wanted anything to do with him. "You know that everyone in the province of Asia has deserted me, including Phygelus and Hermogenes." - 2 Tim. 1:15 (NIV).
Hear hear 👏👏👏
You are absolutely right.
I agree! I argued with more than one preacher when I attended Christian churches about Paul's lack of trustworthiness and his hatred of women and dislike of even the deciples!
Obviously. Good luck getting them to understand that all of Christendom is worshipping Paul in Jesus' name in vain. That's why I say... Do as thou wilt was the whole of the law according to Paul a long time before Aleister Crowley was born into this world.
@@user-cw3ox2nn5t You have missed my point. They wholesale ignore everything Jesus had to say in favor of Paul's watered down gospel of lies and have no clue that there is even any difference at all between what Jesus taught and what Paul taught. In this, they have made an idol out of Paul and worship him exclusively using the name of Jesus in vain.
Maybe Paul wasn't aware that Jesus said (or supposedly said) he came for the children of Israel, not the gentiles. The NT is a mess.
ah ah Paul (or better Saul) was a Doctor of law and a judge
Considering how Paul never read anything that Jesus wrote (i.e. Jesus never wrote anything) or spoke (no written gospels existed during Paul’s lifetime) then Paul was operating from ignorance. After all, his “faith” doctrine was “revealed” to him. Paul apparently believed that he had a euphoric religious experience that led him to Arabia where he received his “revelation of Christ.”
"Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus."
-- Thomas Jefferson
As muslim ,i can't agree more !
Any one who has to prequalify his statement that he (Paul) is "telling the truth, I am not lying" I question their integrity. Why not know you are an honest person and just speak the truth?
Yup. Methinks he doth protest too much.
The Oxford scholars who wrote the Encyclopedia Biblica concluded that Paul never existed. I think it was published in 1919
@@SeekingToServe😂 Right on the money, all the more when Paul admits he does just that - manipulating everybody.
@drakejuice9384 the Encyclopedia Biblica can be purchased online.
@drakejuice9384 I'm not doing your homework for you. You can read their work or not. You can read Bruno Bauer, James Ballantyne Hannay and Ronald Syme, or not.
Christian's really should be called paulines
this is very truth. THOSE who do not know or have never understood the Torah or old testament, CAN'T understand how Paul corrupted the Jesus movement and the Essenes and early 1 st century. The Christians and the history writers have for long, given the Jews a bad reputation as hating Christianity .but really they were seeing their culture hijacked and corrupted by a GREAT MARKETER and charismatic liar like Paul.
Indeed
May God protect you and preserve your life work Rabbai.. it's priceless!
I know rabbi Singer became am apologist due to Christians trying to mislead Jews and he's awesome at it. I believe Hashem is also using him to allow non Jews (I identified as a Christian for almost 30 years. Around 6 years ago I left. I'm a Noahide now]) who were searching for the truth to learn. Even when I was a Christian I knew it wasn't right but it was "comfortable" I had to leave because my burning and hunger for the truth wouldn't allow me to stay. I hope to convert to Judaism but must move to where an orthodox synagogue is. Even if I'm never able to convert I still KNOW Judaism is the truth and will worship Hashem until I die.
Bless you and your family rabbi Tovia Singer ❤.
Keep safe. There are more of us than them.
United we shall prevail 💪.🎉❤❤❤❤❤
Unless you're referring to more educated than uneducated, you're promoting division, not unity. Division among G-d's creation should not prevail
Once again thank you Rabbi Singer for standing on the battlefield. Combating the hypocrisy and idolatry worship of Christianity. The Tanakh has not changed.. The Prophet Isaiah says it all 42:6… Continue serving as the Rabbinical light unto the Nations….
The messiah was supposed to bring world peace. That’s going well.
@@cobraofficer8399 1. God forbids idol worship.
2. Praying to saints or Mary or Jesus who are creations instead of praying only to God who is the creator is idol worship in Judaism and Islam and in some Christian sects.
3. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in Tanakh is a human biological descendant of the messiah king David through the messiah king Solomon meaning the messiah is not God and not a Trinity with God.
4. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in the Quran is a human who did not descend from the messiah king David because a person who has no biological father inherits no tribe in Judaism.
5. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus said he did not die on the cross meaning no one sacrificed him and he explains that he is a human and he is not God.
6. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that not all Christians believe that Jesus is God or that Jesus is a Trinity with God.
@@cobraofficer8399 See 1. Appalled Christian Caller! "You call my religion idolatry?" Rabbi Tovia Singer responds.
See 2. Rabbi Tovia Singer slams Church for erecting a barrier between man and God.
See 3. Did the early Jews believe In a Triune God? Rabbi Tovia slams pastor John Piper. Progressive revelation.
See 4. I’m not a Christian anymore. What can I do? Rabbi Tovia Singer responds.
@@desPrez188right! Whole world is a mess
Thanks!
Thank you! Shalom
I was sought by those who did not ask; I was found by those who did not seek me. I said.."Here, I am..... Here, I am" to a NATION that not call on my name.
I spread out my hands all day long to a rebellious people who walk in the path that is not good, following their own thoughts and they continually anger me to my face.
They say... " Keep to yourself, I am too holy for you!"
*God's covenant with His people is eternal as is his law (the Torah)!!*
*Leviticus 26*
41 Then I too, will treat them as happenstance and bring them [back while] in the land of their enemies. If then, their clogged heart becomes humbled, then, [their sufferings] will gain appeasement for their iniquity,
42 and I will remember My covenant [with] Jacob, and also My covenant [with] Isaac, and also My covenant [with] Abraham I will remember. And I will remember the Land,
43 [For] the Land will be bereft of them, appeasing its sabbaticals when it had been desolate of them, and they will gain appeasement for their iniquity. This was all in retribution for their having despised My ordinances and in retribution for their having rejected My statutes.
44 But despite all this, while they are in the land of their enemies, *I will not despise them nor will I reject them to annihilate them, thereby breaking My covenant that is with them, for I am the Lord their God.*
*Judges 2:1*
1And a messenger of the Lord went up from Gilgal to Bochim and said (in God's name), "I will take you up from Egypt and I have brought you to the land that I have sworn to your forefathers and I said, *'I will not break my covenant with you forever.*
*The eternity of the law:*
*Numbers **15:22*
“‘Now if you as a community unintentionally fail to keep any of these commands the Lord gave Moses- 23 any of the Lord’s commands to you through him, from the day the Lord gave them and continuing *through the generations to come*
*Deuteronomy 5:3*
It was not with our ancestors[a] that the Lord made this covenant, *but with us, with all of us who are alive here today.*
*Psalm 119:89*
*Your word, Lord, is eternal;* it stands firm in the heavens.
*Psalm 119:152*
*Long ago I learned from your statutes that you established them to last forever.*
*See what God tells us:*
*See Hosea 3:4-5:*
4 For the Israelites will live many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred stones, without ephod or household gods. 5 Afterward the Israelites will return and seek the Lord their God and David their king. They will come trembling to the Lord and to his blessings in the last days.
*We sinned, He punishes us, but He will never break his covenant with us - He promised.*
*All other religions are not from God.*
*Jesus was not the promised messiah. He accomplished nothing and according to the NT he made false prophecies and mistakes !*
*Would you like to read those ?*
First of All, we do not worship "A Religion", we worship a GOD who saved us from our own sinful nature through the sacrifice of Our LORD CHRIST. We follow the teachings of JESHUA,the heart of the Law or Torah, that we should love GOD with all our heart and with all our soul and with all our strength and to love our neighbor as ourselves.
What we can take out of the books written in the Tanack is that Israel has been under GOD's judgement throughout scripture keeping his promise to Abraham that GOD would offer protection and land to him and his descendants, but they must follow the path of God not entitled to "ALL" but a "REMNANT" who remain faithful and has received the truth and received grace from the living GOD. You seem far from the GOD of Israel as your words do not speak truth.
JESHUA foretold that not one stone of your temple would stand, as your sacrifices are a stench unto the ETERNAL. "HE IS" the temple and the ONLY way to the FATHER
We bless Israel for the savior was borne out of the tribe of David whose kingdom there would be no end and he will reign over the house of Jacob FOREVER.
The prophet Micah5:2 stated that from Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”
You are right, you will have a temple and you will have a Messiah but it will be an evil incarnate of satan and he will declare himself GOD and desecrate the place where GOD wrote his NAME. These are perilous times called Jacob's trouble.@@PazPinhasRahamim9220
@ramirochavera, Is. 65:1: "I allowed Myself to be sought by those who did not ask; I allowed Myself to be found by those who did not seek Me, I said, "Here I am; here I am!" to a nation not called by My name."
This refers to the Jews scattered among the Gentiles, such as to Babylonia and Assyria (Gentile nations that did not call on God's name). God returns and restores these scattered Jews (who are the remnant) back to Israel., and through the remnant the nation of Israel thrives again. The restoration of the Jews is the major theme of Isaiah, particularly in the final chapters (60-66). Verse 9 establishes the identity of the remnant Jews: "And I will extract seed (descendants) from Jacob and from Judah, the heir of My mountains, and My elect shall inherit it, and My servants shall dwell there." It has nothing to do with Christianity/Christians. That's not Isaiah's theme.
Misinterpreting the text is usually the case. Isaiah 65 is referring to those that were not his chosen, a gentile nation, not the Jews taken into exile because this was GOD's judgement for their rejection of him. Isaiah references back to Israel, a rebellious people who continue to refuse to turn away from their sin and continue to say I am too Holy and my practices will be sufficient. And this continues until this day @@psandbergnz
@@ramirochavera2437 , thanks for your reply, but you misunderstand the text. If the text referred to Jesus or the NT, then you should be able to point to some Christological evidence in the text indicating this. Can you do so? Do you find implied in the passage redemption through the blood of messiah or faith in messiah? That is the essence of Christianity, but where is it even hinted at there?
The context of all the surrounding chapters is about the return of the Jews to Israel/Judah from exile, where generations of Jews had started to forget God's name. But God knows who His people are, and calls them back, as He reveals Himself to them once again.
The obstinate people (verse 2) are the rebellious Jews who had brought God's wrath upon Israel, resulting in the Exile. But God's covenant with Israel is everlasting, so He does not abandon them to die out in exile, but saves a remnant to bring back. This remnant is the descendants of _Judah_ (verse 9), not Gentiles, and they will possess "my mountains". Sharon and the valley of Achor (verse 10) are cities of Israel. So the descendants of Judah (the Jews) inherit those lands again, whereas the former rebellious Jews have now died out. Christians do not inhabit those places - Jews do. It's all focused on Israel/Judah, not foreign lands (where the Gentiles live). God's "holy mountain" (verse 11) is Jerusalem.
It's about the Jews, not the Gentiles. The Gentile nation referred to in verse 1 is where the Jews were scattered, and their knowledge of God had dissipated. But God does not forget them.
WHERE IS THE CONTEXT FOR CHRISTIANITY IN THE PASSAGE?
I learned a lot from this video. Thank you!
Guys, remember every comment makes the video appear in more recommendations to more people. You can help saving people from Christianity by simply commenting, liking and sharing this video
I’m tired of seeing these Pagan Christian adverts on this channel. Makes me sick.
@@abc_6I use you tube premium so I don't have to see ads.
@@abc_6: Same here, but unfortunately the Rabbi has no control over which ads YT decides to plop on a video!
If the Jewish law was truly salvific, Jews would be evangelizing with desperation and urgency. Now of course most Christians aren't evangelizing with the urgency and longsuffering as that of the apostles in the 1st century most unfortunately. But, never has there been a religion of such gatekeeping and pedigree as Judaism. I say this, and also I must say that to those who are unwilling to re-evaluate the Trinity as not being polytheist and pagan, you will likely really never be willing to think with even an iota of abstraction, depth of meaning, introspection. Do you even see the symbolic intricacy of Torah? Although I consider Moses to be the gold standard text among all religion as the true creed to monotheism. What do you think the manner for which God has conducted himself in relation to his creation has been? In the spirit, as God is outside of creation, the unmoved mover, Ancient of Days, coming into creation conveying his divine person through his Holy Ghost. Also incarnate fighting with your father Jacob, in visiting with Abraham with two of his angels. Is the a binitarian expression of our Lord what has been ministered unto us? Moreso, as the incarnation stands before Adam and Eve in the garden I know very well that I see the trinity in the Books of Moses. I see Christ the King. I see the divine person without any doubt or blaspheming, undeniably in the Spirit of the Lord. I believe God dictated every lick of the Torah, and providently guided the ministry of Moses and Aaron oh so deliberately. But God's true testament is decisive, will he have mercy, in the face of our grievous trespass? Will he redeem creation? Can we really be reconciled with the Holy and the Divine, with a simple forgive and forget? With a participation trophy? No in the blood of Jesus I repent and am washed, and reconciled. As per Jesus' insistence, His command, His offering. I mustn't any longer trespass, in Christ I can grow in grace for he has bore my burden, and I am new and being sanctified. In the only true mercy, and the only valid justification. I am in the deepest debt, I've been grafted back onto the tree of life, but at the highest and most incomprehensible cost. For David trusted and commended himself into the hands of God's mercy, in the face of danger, he was fortified in faith, does God not heed him? God destroys death. It happened in 33ad. @@abc_6
Ty rabbi touché ! Christian’s know nothing of Tanakh this is the problem ! Why would they they are not Jewish !
Thank you Rabbi Singer. May Gd Bless and Protect His Chosen Priestly People and the Land of the Living.
@@Michaelbrown-j4lGd Scattered Israel the Northern Tribes among the Heathen Nations and has long been with His Remnant Judah, the Jews, who He has long been refining, they are His Light to the Nations, Not the Heathen Nations to the Jews.
Yes, the good Rabbi is sharing GD and His Eternal Truth/Torah!
@@Michaelbrown-j4l As Scripture tells, Gd will make the Nations to Serve and go by His Firstborn Son Israel the Jews Leadership, the wealth of the Nations will be given to them and the Nations who refuse shall PERISH, just as He will make the children of their Oppressors go to them BENT OVER, just as He will make those who have Despised His Firstborn Son Israel the Jews like yourself to PROSTRATE THEMSELVES at the soles of their feet.
@@Michaelbrown-j4l As Jeremiah prophesied, the Gentiles will come to see that they have inherited only Lies, Emptiness in which there is nothing of any avail!
Rabbi, Jews did believe, but it is not very appealing if you get stoned to death.
The critical component of this review is thinking and treating Paul as a "Christian or Catholic" teacher. Which is what THEY did to him. if he was a decorated pharisee taught by Gamaliel, why is there no consideration for his actual understanding of tanahk. He does have a mastery of torah and doesn't teach against any of the commandments or traditions. But the christians and catholics do.
He obviously talking about alot of things that many didn't understand and felt it was worth getting beaten for his faith over and over again.. it says something.
and Tov suggesting he's utterly unclean and a destroyer of torah is again, like he loves to do, a gross oversimplification and should be directed at Christianities later faults and not to Paul/Shaul.
Very interesting I enjoyed watching thank you Rabbi
The Rabbi is correct. Any critical thinker, Christian or otherwise, sees this clearly.
Paul's teachings came from Genesis. Better read Galatians three, Genesis 15 and 22.
I’m hoping more people learn about the vile truth of Paul. Why did he do this?
Our Father created this Universe. Worship Him
I have been a Christian all my life because of my family. And because I believe in the holy Trinity. It wasn't unti started experiencing sleep paralysis at ten years old.. Is and suffered from the monic attacks for over twenty years.. I read the call on the name of jesus christ from pastor.. It took a while but the demons would get shaken whenever I would call on to his name... They would hate it!! Eventually the sleep Paralysis stopped... I don't just believe in jesus christ to be the son of god because of faith, god because The enemy hates him... Why would demons hate jesus??
Thank you Rabbi Tovia 🇮🇱
@@peterzinya1🙄
@@peterzinya1: And you know that BECAUSE you've done exactly HOW MUCH ACTUAL research??!!
You need to realize, research, and accept, that NOWHERE did God ever mention the "Jesus" character to us, NOWHERE did He tell us we need to be "saved", and NOWHERE did He tell us that He requires HUMAN BLOOD (a purely pagan ritual that God ABHORS!) as atonement for our sins. When God gave us His words to us at Mt. Sinai, He specifically told us that those words are ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding TODAY - a LIVING document!) and that we are NOT to listen to ANY OTHER TEACHING than what is in those ETERNAL Hebrew scriptures. "Christianity" IS another teaching, therefore, we are NOT to follow what it says - God's orders! Therefore, "Christianity" absolutely did NOT come from God - besides which the "NT' is NOT scripture that was given to mankind by God.
PLEASE buy a Hebrew Bible (says "Stone Edition TANACH" on the cover) and Rabbi Tovia Singer's books "Let's Get Biblical - Why Doesn't Judaism Accept the Christian Messiah?", as well as Rabbi Stuart Federow's book "Judaism and Christianity: A Contrast", to help you understand why Christianity absolutely did NOT come from God.
Why is it a problem when people believe that the earth is flat? People are free to believe whatever they want.
I’m Muslim i honestly feel sad for the Christians 😢 they have been taken for a ride and only wake up by the pit of fire but then too late
15:35 (equal to 935 seconds to the time of my watching at 9:35 pm) "This is the way the Greco-Roman world thought, that there was grand mystery salvation." Another point to consider is the question of how to write and speak of things whose understanding is beyond our grasp. Philippians 3 13~3 15 "I may have yet to grasp it yet, but this I know, to give my heart to the Lord and move positively towards my heavenly reward." It's a lovely coincidence that the verse numbers center on Pi's presence. Images of Pi and Christ appeared within our home, leading to the discovery of a mapping of space and time that matches Einstein and Rosen's pragmatic and deterministic view of quantum science. The big surprise to everyone, is that this naturalistic, mechanical explanation matching Einstein also shouts out Christ Jesus. Nobody saw it coming. The world is gob-smacked.
❤ crystal clear ❤thank you rabbi ❤
Thank you so much!! 👍👍👍
I appreciate Rabbi’s teachings… my question is was the Coptic Orthodox Church actually founded around 42 AD? This was long before Paul’s writings and the rest of the New Testament authors. Is there any evidence or explanation of the Coptic Church teachings at that early date.
Doesn't Paul admit in Corinthians that scripturally-literate Jews will not accept the concept that the messiah was defeated by the enemies of the Israelites and returned from the dead rather than destroying the enemies of the Israelites?
interesting question, I hope Rabbi Singer can address this as well.
@@kennethmoore8126 fake old narrative to make you feel good. "Jesus" does not qualify as the jewish messiah.
@@howardrosen3736 jesus is the way, the truht and the life.
@@sialohootnielsembiring292 That's called idolatry.
@@kennethmoore8126Pontius Pilate and the Roman Empire murdered him. Read Isaiah 2 and you shall know the truth of the rabbi's words.
I really did not need to know all this right now. I feel like I am being pulled out of The Matrix.
G-D knows the truth!
Yes, and since He gave us His words at Mt. Sinai, for how He expects us to live, H expects us to SEEK OUT His Truth for ourselves, and not just accept what we've been taught all our lives!
As a person who knows very little about Judaism why do you not just say Gods name?
I would like to hear the Rabbi speak of the times before Moses. To what source did the Jewish people look before the Torah? How about before the time of Noah? In those days were there any guidelines issued by G-d? Humanity has been around for a very long time. Why do religions seem to exist only in the recent past and present? What about it Reb? How did G-d interact with the people near to the beginning? Are we to believe Adam was turned loose to be on his own? Why did G-d wait so long to give us the law?
So before the revelation at Sinai, the tradition or sources were most likely oral transmitted by Abraham. The revelation at Sinai is the most important part of our Jewish history.
@@benjaminashery7728 And before Abraham?
You asked this before. @@Varnaj42
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 Then answer twice.
@@Varnaj42 God gave the 7 Noahide commandments to Adam and Noah.
Is there anyway to donate in amounts other than by every $5?
I prefer to donate in the very specific number of $18.
Am Yisrael Chai
As a conservative Jew (by choice) I thank you for all your videos. It helps me get behind the understanding of my larger Christian family.
Just one problem with saying that, Paul's own testimony. His own experiences and his final fate. I find it impossible to comprehend a man creating a religion, based upon his persecution of said religion, choosing to embrace said religion, suffering the same persecution and being executed for practicing and preaching said religion. That just doesn't add up. But, then I'm fairly certain Paul, along with the other Apostles endured similar arguments and accusations, in their time. Peace be upon you.
What I want to know, or maybe not, is HOW MUCH does the VAtican know? do they know its fake? is the DaVinci code true? Did the Vatican and Knights Templar discover the truth and have very old writings that talk about the plans of apostles or early christians or Paul to "fake it"?
Paul was a "clever" guy who thought: if you can't fight them, join them and mess it up from within.
So paul said... "I became as a Jew for the Jews so as to gain the Jews" sounds like an actor, chameleon, and pretender not a Saint if any kind!
Bless The Jewish Faith ✡️
Yes and when he saw Peter following this advice, he used the moment as an opportunity to call Peter out in public in order to make himself look good and gain more influence among the public by looking superior to "a so-called pillar of the church" as he says. He conman and a hypocrite and he even admits as much
To bro. Singer, pls. do read this Scriptures for your enlightenment: " To the messenger of assymbly at Smyrna, write, Thus says, The First and the Last, He who dead and lives. I know your affliction and poverty and the blasphemy from those who say their nefeshot are Jewish when they are not Jewish, but the congregation of HaSatan."( Revelation 2:8-9HRV). Et shem ישוע Yeshua Messiah benn- Elohim. Hallelu YAH Shalom
Do think that (Gen 16:7, Gen 17:12, and Deuteronomy 30:6) indicates that it is not just about the people of Abraham, at least not at this point in history.
How it came to be that writing about viewing other men as uncircumcised thus disqualified in a public venue without it being perceived as bizarre yet still relevant 2,000 years later continues to amaze me, how did they know each other was uncircumcised?? 👀
Paul spent the first part of his life vigorously opposing and trying to destroy the Jesus Messiah movement; but then he had an encounter with the resurrected Jesus. Paul went from being one of the greatest enemies of the church to being one of its greatest champions.
The resurrection of Jesus is theologically irrelevant.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 The resurrection of Jesus from death made clear that he is God. That's theologically relevant.
@@barrygaynor1025how? 😂 Are you saying Yahowa is incapable of ressurrecting any man after his death?
@@AshrafAnam you misunderstood the point of the resurrection. If Jesus claim to be the son of God why would the Father raise him from the dead? Jesus claim would be blasphemy worthy of destruction but if Jesus is who he claims to be and is without sin then it makes perfect sense that Jesus would be raised from the death as the old testament prophecies of a perfect holy substitute dieing in our place for the punishment we deserve had been fulfilled.
So if Jesus was raised from the dead, it is the most theologically relevant fact in history
I don't believe Paul had that encounter with Jesus, it's a fantasy that fitted in with Paul's agenda. He's such a creepy figure, even when I was a kid in Sunday School something felt off about Paul.
Jews as righteous as they were, Why then trying to kill Paul
**תודה לך הרב**
At first Paul was persecuting Christians!! Then God had completely restored him!! What he was teaching was kinda like using boasting language as though he was so endowed!! However he was a good soul winner!! But the idea of going ahead of the Jews concerning the circumcision and commandments and teaching that he was more superior than those who are scholars and no there God!! You can say he was out of touch!! Remember in life everyone is always learning!! However, The best policy is not to become aggressive or disrespectful to someone who is very much learned in their holy book!! It's not our Job in life to quarrel or wrestle with others about what we think to be correct!! But be humble and learn to listen and understand our differences on things but remain peaceful and let things work themselves out!! Having a good attitude and perspective!
I wish I could meet Rabbi Tovia.
Most Christian are like paul. Making you thing one thing and knowing another
Rabbi, I recently listened to one of your podcasts regarding Paul. My personal opinion is this. The Greeks were basically beginning to accept the concept of Judaism and monotheism but they couldn’t accept the faith hook, line and sinker for a number of reasons.
A big problem was circumcision. They objected to the disfigurement of the body. They didn’t like kashrut because they didn’t really want to change their diet and way of life. And then there is the commandment to keep the Sabbath as well
As other commandments that are either difficult or unappealing.
Paul couldn’t change Judaism to suit the Greeks but Christianity was new and more malleable. So he came up with a simple basic concept that God ( Jesus) died for your sins so it was no longer necessary to observe the commandments, or at least the ritualistic commandments as you pointed out. This isn’t particularly logical but the Greeks bought it and adopted Christianity.
I am a secular Jew. I don’t know but maybe you wouldn’t even consider me a Jew but I was born of a Jewish mother so that makes me Jewish.
Here’s the thing. I can understand the objection to circumcision. It seems barbaric and it is painful. It’s a sign of the covenant between God and the Jewish people yet it sounds like some kind of cult practice. A day of rest sounds pleasing but the rules of how to keep the Sabbath don’t make any sense in a modern world. One can’t drive. I am 72 and it’s a lot easier to drive than to walk but driving is work while walking isn’t. I could go on but I don’t think it’s necessary.
I don’t know but my thinking on the ritualistic aspects seems more in line with the Christian’s than with Orthodox Jews. I don’t believe Jesus died for anybody’s sins but I do question the need to continue to blindly follow rituals. And also, considering all the atrocities in the world especially the many many committed in the name of religion I find it hard to believe there is a God. Would a living merciful God really permit such things to happen?
Basically, my question is why should we continue to observe commandments pertaining to ritual?
1 Corinthians 15:12 Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?
Thank you for this video. One of the reasons I began to doubt Paul was his outrageous statements in Romans 9. In this verse, Paul slanders G-d, claiming that G-d creates people for the purpose of destruction....but before he does this, he makes the claim that G-d hated Esau while he was in his mother's womb. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't find evidence for this claim in the Hebrew Bible.
Paul talks about the Eucharist and the new Lord's Supper and the importance of believers drinking and eating Jesus's flesh and blood, , he is CREATING CATHOLOCISM. he is not teachign what Jesus taught nor what the old testament revelation from God to the Israelites was and taught.
In another twist, in the Book of Acts, Paul personally circumcises Timothy, a man half Greek half Jew, because Paul is going to introduce Timothy to the Jewish leaders of the church in Jerusalem and doesn't want to cause a scandal. We see a whole different Paul in Acts vs his letters.
Paul referred himself as, "of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee" and a learned student of Gamaliel.
Paul passionately persecuted early Christians.
Then, on the road to Damascus, he had an encounter with the risen Christ!
It as both a commissioning and a conversion event.
Only Christ can, in an instant, convert a man of Paul's standing to be His bondservant, even to death.
Even if all the world religions try their best to destroy christianity, Jesus had said that the gates of hades shall not prevail to destroy the church💪💪💪💪
😂😂😂
Hashem is more powerful than the church.
Hear oh Israel the Lord our G-d the lord is one! Why do you practice polytheism? Don't be discouraged however as there is hope! I myself was in the Christian church for almost 30 years and saw the truth! It takes looking at Hebrew scriptures and as BEST you can reading them without a Christian interpretation but a Jewish one. Forget what you're believed ansld start with a clean slate. It is my personal opinion most Christians are scared to. They would rather continue in their polytheism, idolatry and be comfortable in their beliefs even if they are wrong. It's a humbling thing to admit you believe is 🐴 💩 decades I'm a Noahide now but hope to convert❤
The Pope destroyed the church already a while ago when he permitted LGBTQ 🏳️🌈.
Tovia go and pray for the peace of Jerusalem. Jews are gathered from the nations in unbelief Ezekiel 36. Once you are in unbelief how can you.
1 Corinthians 9:20 doesn't say that Paul didn't fulfill the God's law, I guess. There are many places in the Gospel where Paul fulfilled commands of Torah.
The church was establshed and thriving, while Paul was persecuting and opposing the Jesus Messiah movement.
*Jesus's first followers were Torah observant Jews. They simply thought of Jesus as the messiah, not 'God in the flesh'. This is why Raban Gamliel told all not to harm them.. they may have been mistaken, but that does not make them to be idolators.*
*Paul's story about persecuting Christians is made up. The high priest was a Saddicee while Paul says he himself was a pharisee. Those sects never worked together and the high priest didn't have any authority in Damascus just as France doesn't have any authority in Turkey!*
*Paul was a self proclaimed bonified liar.*
@pazrahamim9220 Yes. And the Apostle Paul remained a faithful and devout Jew throughout his entire life, including after he accepted Yeshua as Messiah.
@@barrygaynor1025
'But I myself am not under the law' means just that - Paul was no longer an observant Jew.
@@PazPinhasRahamim9220 I refer you to the book of Acts of the Apostles, particularly the latter chapters. I also refer you to Paul's epistles to Timothy.
@@PazPinhasRahamim9220 First Timothy 1:8.
You've convinced me I need to learn the Hebrew language. In the meantime, could you or someone from your program recommend an English Hebrew Bible that hasn't been Christianized? Peace to you, and thank you!
Paul opposing Peter to his face didn’t mean him going against Peter on everything. That passage is clearly about Paul CORRECTING Peter for he was mistaken in that one particular scenario. The apostles knew that they weren’t infallible hence there were many recorded instances of them debating and correcting one another on Christ’s doctrines. Paul himself consulted the Jerusalem apostles when he was questioning his own path in the gospel truth-Galatians 2:2. He didn’t go against the gospel preached to the Jews. The Jerusalem apostles didn’t preach circumcision. They met to discuss the issue that was brought on by erroneous Jewish Christians to instigate controversy among the gentile churches. All the apostles agreed on the doctrine regarding circumcision that after the assembly Peter along with the other Jerusalem apostles, sent emissaries with Paul back to the gentiles with a letter that clearly stated what was required for their faith and it did not include circumcision-Acts 15:28…
There is no such thing as Paul’s gospel. Many times he explained what he preached wasn’t his own. It would be hard to understand for someone who hadn’t grown in knowledge. Paul in the New Testament arguably had more knowledge about what freedom through faith meant compared to Peter. So much so that Peter even had to be reminded what the new covenant teaching was about eating unclean meats in Acts 10:15. Even then it didn’t mean that they were against each other. Paul was just given more knowledge according to the spirit as he clearly demonstrated in 1 Corinthians 8:8…
Paul rebuked Peter for doing the same thing that he himself does. Paul saw an opportunity to gain power over what he calls "a so-called pillar of the church" (James, Peter, etc. who Paul disliked). He didn't even know Jesus, so his gospel is exactly "his" gospel
@@RealAmericanSicko I’m compelled to respond immediately and strongly for what you have said were all speculations. I don’t know anything in scripture to support your statements unless you care to share it with us. Those are strong statements about Paul disliking Peter and preaching his own gospel to both, I strongly disagree. The idea that the apostles are divided and conniving against one another is malicious. Even though the 12 apostles to the Jews and the 2 to the gentiles each had their own ministries, they were one in Christ by ALL means. Evidenced in 2 Peter 3:16 with Peter advocating for Paul and 1 Cor 1:12 - 13 with Paul advocating for unity in Christ. You are wrong about Paul. It’s your word against his. GALATIANS 1:12.
@@OpieApproved Paul admits that he never knew Jesus. That wasn't speculation. Peter didn't write anything in the New Testament, he was a poor, illiterate Jewish fisherman who spoke Aramaic from Galilee. Unless you mean to speculate that he somehow learned how to write and read Greek. Now about your point on Paul's call for unity-this is the kind of thing that critical scholars see as an issue with Paul. In one breath he will call for unity, yet in another he will say that the original disciples of the historical Jesus (James, Peter, Simon, etc) are "so-called pillars of the church" and "what they are means nothing to me" and "I worked harder than any of them." When you read Paul's letters without rose-colored glasses, he is clearly someone who was or struggled with toxic narcissistic behaviors and sentiments. he "becomes all things to all people" (which is unethical, manipulative, and non-Jewish) yet rebukes Peter for doing the same thing. He also rebuked Peter *publicly*, when Paul himself told his followers to rebuke someone privately at first. his interpretation of the Hebrew Bible is contradictory and dishonest, taking passages out of context just to suit his rhetoric and propaganda.
@@RealAmericanSicko Are we reading the same book? Paul admits he never knew Jesus? In what epistle? In contrary, look up 1 Corinthians 15:7-8. And while you’re at it examine 1 Cor 15:11 so what he said about him “working harder than all of them” in 1 Cor 15:10 would make sense. Your comprehension is rather incomplete. You’re citing parts of a verse that are comparative in nature and not matter-of-fact. They were in support of THE message and not the message themselves. I don’t wear any glasses when I’m reading scriptures. I read them for their message. I scrutinize them. I cross reference them. I evaluate their truth. It’s how I test the spirit in them as was advised by the apostles. It took me a while to agree with Paul because like what Peter said a lot of his writings were difficult to understand for anyone who’s young in knowledge. You have so many mistaken statements that can each be corrected according to scriptures but to save time I picked the most obvious ones like your statement about Peter not writing anything in the NT. I just cited his 2nd epistle in my previous response. But for your enrichment here are proofs: 1 Peter 1:1, 2 Peter 1:1.
@@OpieApproved 1 Corinthians is Paul claiming that the *resurrected* Jesus appeared to him (which may have been true-he could have had a dream or some other spiritual experience. It is irrelevant to the Hebrew Bible because if anyone for any reason claims that anyone but YHVH is God, then it is idolatry and is therefore forbidden to the Israelites / Jews). 1 Cor 15 is not proof that Paul knew Jesus prior to his death. I could tell you to look up Bart Ehrman, Richard Carrier, Dennis McDonald, etc., but the top issue that Christians have in seeing the truth about Paul is that you all take him at his word on everything. You believe he was a Pharisee because he says so. You believe he rebuked Peter for good reasons because he says so. But the story doesn't add up when you look at the details. And Paul contradicts himself a lot because he was willing to take verses from the Hebrew Bible out of context and change their meaning to suit his needs and his message. The original disciples of Jesus were Jews from Galilee and they didn't consider Paul a legitimate apostle (keep in mind that when they looked for Judas' replacement in the Book of Acts, they looked for someone who was with them "since the baptism of John". Paul didn't meet the criteria)
888th comment! Today saw 5:39 on a license plate in front of me. A firetruck appears lights and sirens flashing from the right and crosses us to our left. 935HUA is responding to our emergencies (as read from right to left). And from left to right (5 39) he is reminding us to 8ive 8od 8lory because after all, he is the God that gives us breath and breath to every little quantum wave in the universe. His presence lies at the heart of all 539eNeRATioN (regeneration).
Hello what English Tanak or bible do you recommend. Thank you.
I mean this as a compliment,Rabbi Singer reminds me of Cameron Vale from the early 80's movie Scanners,who was a bad ass good guy.
Never heard of "Cameron Vale", or that movie, but...OK! I just looked it up on IMDB. The movie exists (1981), but there's no "Cameron Vale" listed in the credits. He is listed on IMDB for a different movie, but his profile has no information.
Thank you, Rabbi Singer. I believe Paul is just as much a fictional character, created by the church, as Jesus Christ was.
I hadn't ever considered that the characters of the so called NT were made up! I do know the whole virgin birth thing predates Christianity! Egypt and ancient Babylonia had similar stories so I should have considered that.
@@susanlett9632 there is no evidence outside the Bible that Paul existed. As for Jesus, the earliest references outside the Bible to his existence are by Tacitus, Suetonius and Pliny the Younger, who all knew each other and were obviously Roman elites whose work is designed to historicize the Christian movement. For example, Suetonius mentions that Emperor Claudius exiled Jews who were causing riots in Rome because of "the instigator Chrestus.". Christ is deliberately misspelled by Suetonius. These are very crafty authors. Read Pliny's letter to Trajan. Pliny was instrumental in historicizing the early Church, which was invented by Roman elites to supercede Judaism. The Romans invaded Judea after the Greeks did, and they needed to create an Anti Semitic religion to compete with Judaism, which was spreading through the empire and opposed slavery, taxation and worship of Caesar as God.
There's more evidence Moses was fictional than Jesus Christ
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms
If we can only know G-d through being bestowed with the Holy Spirit than we do not have free choice.
Regarding knowing Moses and his Torah are true;
G-d reveled himself directly to the Israelites. He also directly showed them that Moses is his messenger.
(G-d existence was not proved based on miracles and Moses status as a prophet was not proved based on miracles. G-ds commandments taught by Moses were not proven to be from G-d through miracles.)
Revelation happened to 600,000 plus ppl.
These ppl were commanded to tell their children exactly what they saw.
As Deuteronomy 4 says: they saw no image and only heard G-ds voice. This is what they are commanded to pass down to their children.
This is how they know G-d.
(Deuteronomy 13 (and last verse in 12 from Christian bibles) states that if an individual claims to be a messenger from G-d and even performs a sign (miracle) yet he either adds or removes laws or tells you to follow a G-d we do not know - he is a false prophet)
The 600,000 plus ppl passed down to their children all that they saw and that Moses taught to them.
The best generation who did not witness revelation themselves had ample witnesses that it was true. They in tune passed it to the next generation and so on.
Each generations multiple sources were witness to the previous generations teachings.
There were also leaders who insured that the teachings were passed down and were responsible that all the information was completely taught to the successor.
(Eventually the teachings that were passed down and taught in schools was recorded into the mishna and then the teachings in the mishna were recorded into the Talmud)
In very short;
In Judaism we have our mesorah (our passed down teachings starting straight from Moses) that affirms our faith and beliefs and knowledge of G-d and his commandments.
Perhaps as an individual who subscribes to a belief and teachings like the New Testament that is not meant for a specific ppl this concept is hard to understand.
Have a good day
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms one last thing;
In Judaism teaching the scriptures and the mesorah is paramount.
A parent’s obligation to teach their child everything. From a to z.
Either directly or through a teachers (which they obviously make sure it’s someone reliable)
In Judaism studying and understanding G-d and his commandments is number one.
It comes before secular education.
And is taken extremely seriously.
There is also the concept of studying for the sake of studying (as opposed to for the sake of knowing and doing )
There are many individuals who dedicate their life to studying the Torah.
This so considered praiseworthy and many ppl will help support them financially.
Question Rabbi I am not A Jew so that I may ask the right question. Wasn’t there a Rabbi that Wrote a Book that had the Messiah Identified but, the book was not to be released for about 8-10 years after his death.?I believe he was around 104 when he died. I am sorry I don’t remember his name.
Who delivered Pauls letter to the Romans Christians
Paul pointed out that 430 years prior to Israel and the Law, the Word preached the Gospel To Abram and Abram was saved by faith alone, without works. This is not an invention, it is in Genesis. (Genesis 15/Galatians 3:7-19) Most Christians don't even understand this and that Judaism has Christian roots not the other way around.
Never believed the idea that circum is not necessary. So Paul forced his belief onto the early believers in Christ. From a Christian.
Great show!👍 Does anyone have an idea of what scriptures Paul referred to, in 1 Corinthians, when saying Jesus would be crucified n resurrect 3 days later??
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms appreciate ur time... So which OT scriptures was Paul referencing? A specific Psalm or David?
@@peterrabbit1054
Paul expounded on the Resurrection of JESUS CHRIST by quoting a few verses in the Psalms. Act.13:22-39
Here is the real truth about Paul. Throughout the Torah and the prophets WE KNOW that Judaism accepts converts from those of the nations who come to faith in the One and ONLY Creator of Heaven and Earth. Our prophet Ezekiel in Chapter 47:22-23 laid out the words of YKVK so well that there can be no confusion that everyone who comes to faith in YKVK becomes as the native-born Israelite WITH INHERITANCE within the tribe he dwells with. Did Paul obey this command of YKVK? No. Ask yourself why Paul had to make a long trip out of Israel to Damascus to hunt down and kill Jews who believed Yeshua was the Messiah? Weren't there enough Jews who followed Yeshua in Israel he could kill??? If you are thinking something doesn't add up here you are thinking correctly. Believing someone is the promised Messiah of Israel is no sin, and certainly not an offense punishable by death according to Torah. What the hell was this Paul actually doing? [ to be continued ]
@@menmustchangebeforekingdoms
Just to let you know, I respect your right to free speech, and in my right to free speech I say to you that I do not engage the unbeliever as it serves no purpose.
I think the critical document for understanding non Paulines is the Didache fragment. It shows a unitarian "Christianity" that predates the Pauline Binitarian and Trinitarian variants. God the Father alone is supreme, Jesus is an exalted servant, a prophet like David. The cup of wine and the breaking of bread was obviously a variation on the Sabbath Meal with messianic apocalyptic influence. The actual disciples were spreading their understanding of Judaism to both Jews and non Jews. Then Paul came into the picture and everything went off the rails.
The trinitarian formula in the Gospel’s text appears also in Didache 7.1.
Don't let singer lull you."And you will be hated by all for my name's sake. But whoever endures to the end will be saved." Matthew 10:22
You follow a greek paper😅
@@theraabimelech yess, thank you for saying that.
I’m Muslim and I certainly agree with what this jew rabbi is saying you need to wake up Paul is the anti christ it’s simple you can’t defend him 😊
How do you know that the Old Testament isnt changed.I am a believing Christian myself and believe in the Old Testament as the revealed word of God.But my point is that the same argument can be made about the old Testament itself
Thanks for this great video. It makes me think about why Jews hated Paul so much. The question is why? Ironically, you mentioned how people in the past died and they didn't know why. Medicine got better, but it takes time. The Gospel is also something that was revealed through time. Paul became Christian after Jesus resurrection, therefore, he was no longer under the Law. He was under the Grace of my Lord Jesus. Paul, just like Jesus, was persecuted by Jews. E.g. "They promised that they would not eat or drink anything until they killed him. 13More than 40 men took part in this plan." Don't get me wrong, I love the Jews. I just see that Paul was hated in the past because he was preaching the salvation through Jesus Christ.
When the *TWO WITNESSES* arrive for the sake of calling out the 144,000 (12,000 from 12 tribes of Israel) they will be preaching the SAME *Gospel* that Paul preached.
Lucifer tends to bring about *false* prophets, and teachers BEFORE the Genuine comes on the scene, for the sake of misrepresenting that which is to come.
Still, God has the POWER to meet the challenge!!!!
So Paul, a jew, established christianity, so therefore christianity is a deception. so why are we criticising christian's delusion, when they have been consistently entrapped?
This makes no sense to me.
I just don't follow the significance of Rabbi Singer's criticism of Paul's take on Jesus' resurrection (I Corinthians 15:3-9). The claim is that Paul was a maverick for making up "his own unique version of Christianity" by suggesting Jesus rose in spirit, contradicting the gospel narratives that Jesus rose in physical body! In I Corinthians 15:3-9 Paul speaks of Jesus' physical death and burial, but then he states Jesus afterward "appeared" to the disciples, then 500 others, then to Paul himself, the former appearing to agree perfectly with the gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John).
If you read further down (I Corinthians 15:12-17), Paul repeatedly speaks of the Jesus being "raised from the dead," so I just don't understand the contradiction the Rabbi is trying to make? If Jesus appeared to the disciples, 500 others, and Paul himself, it seems he is referring to a physical reality that can be seen! But to be clear, whether the resurrected body is spiritual or physical (probably both), the bible is clear in the book of Revelation 21:3-4: "And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, 'Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God himself will be among them, and he will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away."
As an aside, the Old Testament also alludes to this in Isaiah 35. Verse 10 reads: "And the ransomed of the Lord will return and come with joyful shouting to Zion, with everlasting joy upon their heads. They will find gladness and joy, and sorrow and sighing will flee away!"
The Canaanite Woman as well she even ask Jesus to help with lower self and ended up saying to her
"be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.”
But it switches up alot it had demon etc. Go over this when you can .
Paul opposed circumcision for gentiles. He believed Jews should stay Jews and gentiles remain gentiles.
1 Corinthians 11:23-26 directly quotes Jesus in saying to break the bread and drink the wine..so that just doubly contradicted you. He DID quote Jesus, and the only thing found in 1 Cor. 11 re. the Lord's Supper that you find objectionable was direct quote from Jesus' LIFE here..and it was Jesus who instituted it, Paul merely repeated it, Paul did not invent it. Most of us Christians believe Jesus' words re. the Lord's supper are spiritually symbolic, not literal. You are referring to the beliefs of the false unbiblical Catholic church who preach what Timothy calls in NT "doctrines of demons", such as forbidding marriage (i.e. of priests, and we all know how much damage and corruption that caused)..
The Apostle Paul also said in Galatians 3:24 "Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith." So yes the law meant MORE than merely types and shadows. The New Testament regularly refers to New Testament writings as "scripture". It is OUR Scripture, in addition to the Hebrew Bible. You will just have to get over your offense lol..we would be offended with your attitude toward us and our beliefs if we didn't love you so much!!🤗❤❤ Paul is not LYING, he is re-interpreting passages of the Hebrew Bible in the context of his Christian beliefs. He clearly believed it meant something more for the AD context. Paul did believe in what Jesus taught, which was REPENTANCE for sins, so yes it IS New Testament beliefs to turn from transgression/sin, thru repentance and then thru power of the Holy Spirit. If you believe in/agree with throwing the apostle Paul in prison, do you believe in throwing Christians in prison too?
09:40 - Incorrect. The physical world is tainted by the flawed material world, which encompasses man-made constructs like the lord in the Old Testament. Distinguishing between the material and physical realms is crucial. Ideally, the material world should be guided by truth, leading to eternal identities, but in reality, false beliefs, such as the fear of God or the idea of God as a Lord, have a significant influence.
The Truth manifested within the material narrative through the character of Jesus, employing the very tool that Satan used to divert us from the truth. While the Old Testament represents the material world, the Truth entered it to expose its deceptions and reveal the path to redemption and enlightenment.
Your hero caused the Jews to be slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humbled, the Torah to be altered, and the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord.
If you can turn from your sins all by yourself, why then do you need a redeemer
more Christians need to watch this , the more accurate name for the religion is PAULIANITY
This one really helps,especially the Gnostic, Greek, connections.🤔
Paul was a latecomer to the Christian movement. Paul spent the first part of his life vigorously opposing and trying to destroy the church and then he converted to the Jesus Messiah movement. Paul went from being one of the greatest enemies of the church to being one of the greatest champions of the church.
@user-cw3ox2nn5t I suggest you start by reading Paul's own epistles. I suggest you then read Acts of the Apostles. I suggest you then read the writings of the Nicean Fathers. I suggest you then read one of the many respected works, known as Systematic Theological Works.
Paul is the false Apostle written of by Christ in Revelation 2:2
Because of Paul's word salad, 99.9 percent of Christians will not be saved
The word in Tankah Jewish scripture is not fulfilled by Paul changing the word of God.
Example 1 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining that the Hebrew word seed in Scripture is like the English word sheep to show how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed in Galatians 3:16 that the Hebrew word seed in scripture (Torah Genesis 17:7 and Genesis 22:18) means one person and therefore must be about Jesus because if it was about more than one person Scripture would have used the word seeds (however in Hebrew the word seeds does not exist meaning “seeds” never appears in Hebrew scripture). The reasoning of Paul is the same as someone claiming that the English word sheep means one sheep because if it was about more than one sheep then the word used would be sheeps. (The word sheeps does not exist in English like the word seeds does not exist in Hebrew). God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed.
.
Example 2 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed in 1 Corinthians 9:9 - 10 that the commandment in Torah Deuteronomy 25:4 “do not muzzle an ox” is really about humans and not animals. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed.
.
Example 3 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul confirms that Jesus was not resurrected in 1 Corinthians 15:35 and 1 Corinthians 15:44 where Paul claims that the resurrected come in a spiritual body however three days after the crucifixion Jesus showed that his body was a physical body and not a spiritual body in Gospel of John 20:17 where Jesus confirms he has not yet died “I have not yet ascended to the Father (God)” meaning the life of Jesus was saved with sleep on the cross in the same way God saved others who were sleeping in Gospel of Mark 5:39, Gospel of Matthew 9:24, Gospel of Luke 8:52 and Gospel of Luke 8:54 - 8:55. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed.
.
Example 4 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed the sacrifice of Jesus took away the sins of the world and therefore Jesus removed animal sacrifices.
God tells us that when the Temple that is described in Ezekiel chapters 40 to 47 is constructed it will include the animal sacrificial system as it did in the Solomon Temple (the first temple) and the Herod Temple (the second temple) and that in the Ezekiel temple (the third temple) the messiah will bring sacrifices for himself and for the people. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed.
.
Example 5 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining how Paul changed the word of God when Paul claimed the anointed messiah is both a King and a High priest in Hebrews 4:14. An anointed messiah king descends biologically from David however an anointed messiah High priest descends biologically from Aaron meaning the anointed messiah king cannot descend from both David and Aaron meaning an anointed messiah king cannot do the duties of an anointed messiah High priest. God uses Paul to test who will follow the word of God and who will follow Paul in the test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed.
Paul taught the church how to change the word of God.
The word of God is not fulfilled by wrong Christian translations of Tanakh Jewish scripture.
Example 1 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians understand that Psalm 22 mentions the lion three times in the Hebrew scripture and in most Christian translations but was wrongly translated in the Christian produced Septuagint Bible in Psalm 22:16 as “they pierced my hands and my feet” instead of the Hebrew Psalm 22:17 “like a lion they (my enemies, the enemies of King David) are at my hands and my feet.” The lion and the animals mentioned in Psalm 22 represent the enemies of King David.
.
Example 2 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians by explaining Psalm 40:6 in a Christian Bible (which is Psalm 40:7 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture) is not about Jesus because the Hebrew words “My ears you have opened” were wrongly replaced with the Greek words “A body you have prepared for me.”
.
Example 3 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians understand why Psalm 110:1 in Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about Jesus is by explaining that after messiah King David said “My God my God why have you forsaken me” in Psalm 22 then God revealed through Prophet Nathan in Psalm 110:1 “My Lord (God) said to my lord (messiah King David)” words that show God has not forsaken the messiah King David.
.
Example 4 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is by explaining Isaiah 7:14 in Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about Jesus because the Hebrew word young women in Isaiah 7:14 was wrongly translated as Virgin.
.
Example 5 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that the child Hezekiah named mighty God who “has been born” in Isaiah 9:5 in the Tanakh Jewish Bible was made into Jesus by writing “shall be born” in Isaiah 9:6 in Christian produced bibles.
.
Example 6 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that Isaiah 53 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about Jesus but is an explanation of the past and present and future of the children of Israel.
.
Example 7 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that the New Covenant in Jeremiah chapter 31 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about the New Testament Bible but is the confirming and strengthening of the first everlasting covenant with a new promise that in the end of days the law Torah Taurat will be put in the human heart permanently meaning in the end of days which are the days of God no human will intentionally rebel against God.
.
Example 8 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians is explaining that the son in Isaiah 7:14 is not Jesus but is the son of Prophet Isaiah.
.
Example 9 of Muslims and Jews and Noahides helping Christians by explaining that Zechariah 12:10 in the Tanakh Jewish scripture is not about the death of Jesus by crucifixion but about how a loved one who is killed with a sword in the battle between Israel and Gog will move all Israel to remember God and this will bring the defeat of Gog and will bring the messianic age.
Paul is not the word of God.
See 1. Report card on the Apostle Paul: Pass or fail?
See 2. Why did Paul lie about his mysterious revelations? Rabbi Tovia Singer responds.
See 3. Paul corrupted the Hebrew Scriptures and could not have been a Pharisee, explains Rabbi Tovia Singer.
See 4. Was Paul a Rabbi, an ignoramus, or a charlatan? Rabbi Tovia Singer responds.
See 5. Hebrews contains the most outlandish assault on Judaism of any book in the NT. Rabbi Tovia Singer.
See 6. Faith vs Works! Paul corrupted the Jewish Scriptures, explains Rabbi Tovia Singer.
See 7. In the name of God! Rabbi Tovia Singer exposes Paul in powerful interview.
Mysteria in Greek mean a secret ritual that is open to a limited set of people and about wich is forbidden to communicate to other people. It is evident that Paul uses this term in a very different meaning.
Hi, I would have to question Tovia's statement that the Gospels were written 20 - 30 or even 40 years after Paul's writings - because the last Book of the New Testament was written Just prior to Mid 66 AD.
The Wikipedia article titled, 'Book of Revelation' wrongly dates the book of Revelation to having been written in the Emperor Domitian's time or around 81-96 AD as this excerpt of the intro shows:
"The author names himself as simply "John" in the text, but his precise identity remains a point of academic debate. Second-century Christian writers such as Papias of Hierapolis, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Melito of Sardis, Clement of Alexandria, and the author of the Muratorian fragment identify John the Apostle as the "John" of Revelation.[5][6] Modern scholarship generally takes a different view,[7] with many considering that nothing can be known about the author except that he was a Christian prophet.[8] Modern theological scholars characterize the Book of Revelation's author as "John of Patmos". The bulk of traditional sources date the book to the reign of the Roman emperor Domitian (AD 81-96), which evidence tends to confirm.[9][d]"
The Actual INTERNAL Evidence within the book of Revelation does emphatically NOT tend to confirm the 81-98 AD dating by secular scholars Nor their completely spurious 'Unknown' John as the Author.
Part of the problem with misinterpretation of numerous passages in the texts - of both Old and New testaments - especially with regard to the flow of prophetic narratives - is the introduction to all bibles, by one of two Roman Catholic Cardinals in the 1200's AD of the completely 'arbitrary' Chapter numbering system which even Scholars and critics state is 'incoherent' in places - in this Wikipedia article, Titled; 'Chapters and verses of the bible' under the heading, 'Christian versions' as follows:
"Cardinal Hugo de Sancto Caro is often given credit for first dividing the Latin Vulgate into chapters in the real sense, but it is the arrangement of his contemporary and fellow cardinal Stephen Langton who in 1205 created the chapter divisions which are used today. They were then inserted into Greek manuscripts of the New Testament in the 16th century. Robert Estienne (Robert Stephanus) was the first to number the verses within each chapter, his verse numbers entering printed editions in 1551 (New Testament) and 1553 (Hebrew Bible).[25]
The division of the Bible into chapters and verses has received criticism from some traditionalists and modern scholars. Critics state that the text is often divided in an incoherent way, or at inappropriate rhetorical points, and that it encourages citing passages out of context. Nevertheless, the chapter and verse numbers have become indispensable as technical references for Bible study."
----
Indeed, the numbering systems are or have become indispensable for finding and quoting various texts - however- and herein lies the problem regarding two of the most important books of the bible having been dated to the wrong eras in which the internal evidence shows they were actually written in - most notably the 'Book of Daniel' erroneously dated by scholars to Antiochus IV Epiphanes' era of between 176 - 174 BCE and the Book of Revelation to a much later time than the INTERNAL EVIDENCE of the book of Revelation itself shows in chapter 1 and the 'small book' prophecy of Revelation 10:8 through to its end in 11:2 - where a new prophecy for our modern age begins at Revelation 11:3 through to 11:18 showing the exact timing of the Resurrection of the saints from verses 13-18 at the sounding of the 7th or 'last trump', i.e. Revelation 11:15 - just as Paul taught in 1 Corinthians 15:51-53 & 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17.
The True - internal Dating - of the book of Revelation to Between 65 and Mid 66 AD as follows, below, i.e, Just BEFORE Vespasian and Titus' Military campaigns that began in mid 66 AD and carried through to the Second Temple and Jerusalem's destruction over a period of 3 1/2 years to 70 AD:
Revelation 10:8-11:2's 'small book' prophecy in its entirety - but without the arbitrary and faulty chapter numbering system which also screws up the verse numbering system in many biblical prophecies - not the least of which is Daniel 11:40-45 thought to be 'inaccurate' prophecy by secular scholars in Wikipedia's article titled, 'Book of Daniel'.
"And the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go and take the little book which is open in the hand of the angel which standeth upon the sea and upon the earth.
And I went unto the angel, and said unto him, Give me the little book. And he said unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey.
And I took the little book out of the angel's hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter.
And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.
And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.
But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles:
and the holy city SHALL they tread under foot forty and two months."
Note the future Tense used in the last verse of the - small book - prophecy above, because in Revelation 1:1-3 and 1:11 and 1:19 John is not only commanded to write everything he sees in the present and his future [1:19] in a book [1:11] because 'the time was at hand' [1:3] for the destruction of the second temple to take place [Matthew 23:33 through to 24:26] But to Send that Book to the 7 Asia minor churches still extant at that time - BEFORE THE TEMPLE was destroyed.
The 'abomination of Desolation' Matthew 24:15 & Mark 13:14 was actually Vespasian's Roman Army standing where it ought not to stand, i.e. in the 2nd temple grounds as the 9th chapter 70 weeks prophecy of Daniel foretold from Daniel 9:24-27.
In Revelation 11:2 Jesus apostle John the actual writer/author of Revelation - emphatically does NOT record the destruction of the second Temple as he was commanded to do in Revelation 1:19.
------
Just as the scholars are completely wrong about the Dating of the book of Revelation to 81-96 AD when It was completed and sent to Asia minor churches before Mid 66 AD - the secular scholars are also completely wrong about Dating Daniel to 200 BCE or Antiochus IV Epiphanes' era of between 176 and 174 BCE, ironically. on the assumption that Daniel 11:40-45 was a prophecy about Antiochus' Military campaigns and death - When it is perfectly Accurate Prophecy covering Vespasian and Titus' military campaigns and Vespasian's Death instead.
Refer to the Wikipedia article Titled, 'Book of Daniel' under the intro and Subheadings of Historical Background, Development, Authorship and Dating for relevant details of the completely wrong assumptions about the book of Daniel - all based in Daniel 11:45 supposedly being Antiochus' Death When the Vespasian article at wikipedia under the subheading, 'Death' shows very clearly Vespasian did indeed died of natural causes as Daniel 11:45 said he would, i.e. "And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him."
----
So Revelation being the last book of the Hebrew/English bible written - therefore shows ALL the other gospel books, including Paul's writings - were written before mid 66 AD also. 🙃
Thank you rabbi
As-salamu aleijkum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu.
I have a question about the circumcision.
I know (now) that also Muslims does it, but I haven't seen it mentioned in the Qur'an and my current opinion if that's the correct word here for it is, that it was done hygiene reasons in old times when it wasn't so easy to take care of your hygiene.
Could you give more insight about this from Jewish perspective, because I believe that it may come from there or was it something what people did in that area (like was it just a habit of that time when there wasn't running water and showers "everywhere".
Also I think that modern knowledge says that everything in human body has a meaning example eyelashes protect your eyes and foreskin also protect your thing from something or was it given to men just so it can be "cut" off?
Thank you and Barak Allahu fikum 🤲🏻
Jews are commanded to circumcise all males on the eighth day after their birth in Leviticus 12:3. Since the descendants of Keturah became intermingled with the descendants of Ishmael, all of them are obligated to circumcise their male children on the eighth day. However, the children of Keturah are not liable to punishment by a court for not observing this commandment, since it is not part of the Seven Noahide Commandments.
Dear fellow muslim, wa alaikumassalam, Most of the day to day laws of islam is described very clearly in the sahih/ authentic hadith of Prophet. And circumcision of a baby boy is compulsary/ fard per all sahih hadith. And yes, this wass follwed by all islamic prophets , at all times
@@LA-ws7gx Thank you for your answer. I have been Muslim now about two and half months and I have read (Finnish) Quran only once from cover to cover and One book about prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) life. So I don't know much these things.
I don't know are there that many Hadith written in Finnish (my mother tongue). I need to check what I can find in English I think.
Barak Allahu fikum 🤲🏻
@@stefanhenneken5415I hope there are mosques nearby where you are , they will welcome with all the love, and answer any questions on daily life in Islam. May Allah keep you Iman strong❤
@@LA-ws7gx I am using Džemat (Mosque) what is used Bosniaks who came here during and after Bosnian war. 🙂
Debate Sam shouman
you say Pauls audience was non jews, but he was always speaking in the synagogues of the cities he traveled to; i would also like to say ive always had problems with the way old testament scriptures seemed to be taken out of context by new testament writers. what was the intended meaning of a verse was it translated correctly etc.Its all very frustrating when your just trying to honor and respect GOD
On the contrary. Paul as an Orthodox Jew will unlikely do such changes unless he experienced something supernaturally good, moving and life-changing event personally with someone Divine like Jesus telling him to do so 🙏✝️ . And by the way the correct term is abrogation because he didn't corrupted anything he just debunked the Jews of their hypocrisy of understanding the laws. 💯✔️👍