The Combustion Engine Perfected - Porsche GT4 RS
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ค. 2024
- The Porsche Cayman GT4 RS takes the 911 GT3 engine, and packs it in a mid-engine car!
Subscribe to Engineering Explained for more videos! - goo.gl/VZstk7
Recommended Books & Car Products - amzn.to/2BrekJm
EE Shirts! - bit.ly/2BHsiuo
The Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 RS is the pinnacle of Porsche Cayman, packing the 911 GT3's 4.0L boxer 6-cylinder engine, with nearly 500 horsepower. The naturally aspirated engine revs to 9,000 RPM, while delivering immediate response and torque. This is paired with a 7-speed PDK from the previous GT3, giving it the most aggressive gearing in a Porsche GT car, matched with the small platform of the 718. How does it all work out? Beautifully. This is truly among the best drivers cars out there, despite not carrying a stick-shift transmission. Out on the track, it's difficult to think of what can match the joy.
Engineering Explained is a participant in the Amazon Influencer Program.
Don't forget to check out my other pages below!
Instagram: / engineeringexplained
Facebook: / engineeringexplained
Twitter: / jasonfenske13
EE Extra: / @engineeringexplainede... - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
Quite enjoyed the GT4 RS! For anyone interested in learning more about the engine specifically, I have a full deep dive video on it: th-cam.com/video/8xByM10KM2k/w-d-xo.html
It can be efficient with Cylinder deactivation but also if fossil fuels were cheaper.
What if we reversed the cost of electricity vs fossil fuels? Would we be saying gas powered cars are more efficient. It seems like neither are good for the environment when we include manufacturing, use, storage and disposal.
video idea: why wont porsche perfect the gt4 and sell it for little more than a gt3? is it that they just actually need so much of the weight over rear tires? b/c i doubt it, huaracan is less weight more power midengine and outpaces gt3 straight line.
I kept expecting an April fool's something in this video lop
Thanks for another awesome video man! I've watched many other videos on the GT4 RS and nobody described the engine/gearing feel clearly like you did. I want the DeMan version SO bad 😁
This was a really enjoyable review compared to so many fluffers out there. I'm holding out for a Spyder RS as my very last automobile purchase.
You gotta give it to Porsche. Easily the most aggressive factory launch control out there. And it works great. And you can use it back to back to back to back and it couldn't care less lol.
Yep! Watching the videos of these and similar, they just eat it up. As long as you have fuel, it will rip all day and night.
Electric cars will always be faster but the feeling and “soul” From combustion engine cars can never be beaten
I agree, but if we're honest, it's the most useless thing on the street. I would get a kick out of someone using launch control at the Starbucks drive-thru though. 😆
@@EvanMoon nah, porsche can compete with electric! If they wanted. Porsche are fast!! They are masterpiece !
Right? Yea hey guess what song I'm singing: dee do dee dee dee dee dee, dee do dee dee do dee dee dee dee do, dee dee do, dee dee do, do dee do. duh do dee do.
A 9hp drop from 502 down to 493 is a bargain for the increased handling that the mid engine layout will give this car.
You put too much hope in engine layout. It is not better, just different. Slightly less traction and slightly more snappy at oversteer because of smaller polar moment of inertia but better balance. It is a tradeoff. Cayman is better because it is smaller. 911 got too big for normal roads.
@@jkk916 It's better. How many race cars do you see with the engine behind the rear axle, other than 911s?
@@jonboy602 Which one is faster on track, 911 gt3 rs or Cayman gt4 rs? Also, those are still not race cars. Design of race cars is even more dominated by downforce and technical rules and this usually means some advantage for mid engined cars, in a big part due to aerodynamics (more place for rear diffuser).
Length difference between gt4rs and 992 gt3 is less than 12cm, so they are almost equal in size.
Advantage gt3 has are suspension and rear wheel steering.
Also the engine which wasn't designed for midengine layout.
Really great car, with superior engine layout, almost has it all. But still slower than GT3 because of mentioned reasons.
Handling isn't determined by layout alone. Cayman would never be faster than gt3, porsche screwed it up on purpose on the development stage. Most important part of this is crappy mcpherson suspension front AND back. You can't possibly fix that.
"We don't really care what the top speed of this car is, we're just trying to make it really fun, really enjoyable to drive..."
THANK YOU. I wish more companies would adopt this ethos. What a car can do on paper is meaningless. How it makes you feel is what matters. Losing sight of that is why this industry is such garbage these days.
Kind of, yeah ... but, not on the Track, but the unlimited Autobahn, coming home from a workweek, I just want a car that is efficient at high speeds. Been looking into mid-priced Mercedes W203 lately, as they pretty much fit the bill and aren't that expensive, but get cheaper still (plenty of them available, too young and too longlasting to already be a classic, too ugly to ever become an icon). In a fun car - currently a Mini - I don't care about top speed either. Papers say 148 kph or so ... pretty low actually, but flooring it on the Autobahn, I wouldn't do anyway outside of emergency situations...
Find yourself that last propper 205 GTi.
It's going to get worse
Amen!
I love the unbridled joy in Jason's face. Engineers have a reputation for poor emotional communication, but he manages to not only explain engineering, but he clearly loves it and shares that love with his audience.
I don't know who you've been talking to, but engineers are some of the most enthusiastic people out there. If not for IP laws, they'd be all over everyone explaining the latest little innovation they made.
Lend me a race car for free and I, too, will show you unbridled joy on camera if you want :)
Jason, you should do more videos on vehicle maintenance. Making your car's engine, suspension, and transmission last as long as possible, and the common long-term failure points in these systems. From a scientific perspective, of course :)
Love your videos!
With a whiteboard
Get ready for "how tires make your car last longer" 😂
I'd watch.
A comparison of 2 of the same vehicles the same age but taken care of differently would be interesting.
Obviously garaging, location, use/mileage, and how on top of maintenance are huge factors.
Likewise I've been hoping he'd do something on that -- how to make a vehicle last a very long time. Including the paint. Or, especially the paint, given how important it is to appearance, and the cost to repaint it.
Is that too mundane for him now? Seems he's getting away from his roots of explaining engineering principles. I'm also wondering if sponsors are buying him out -- seems some reviews now are more like sales jobs than engineering analyses. For this one, how did he get his hands on this exotic track Porsche? Someone selling them set him up at a race course, and they talked about it before the review. He's repeating what they told him.
@@DonTruman If Jason started covering topics for a 3rd or 4th time, people might start calling him out for farming views. He's been publishing videos for almost 10 years now, and I'm certain he's covered these topics plenty
The stance, exhaust note, and styling are all 100% perfect.
What I like about Porsche? They are not overly-fancy, they are not record setter in terms of pure numbers, but these are cars made for the most effective experience on track days. These are proper driver cars!
To be fair, they often are the record setters in terms of pure numbers too! The GT2RSMR is still faster than any production car on the 'Ring and the GT2RS was the fastest production car for a while. That's just an added bonuns though, I totally agree with your sentiment.
I also quite like the longer gearing- more of the sound for longer! I don't really care if a tuned Golf R can out-drag my 981CS...because nobody else cares that the Golf exists once they hear the flat 6 😆
The carreras can be a handful to drive fast. I hate how they feel because you always have to be right on the edge for it to be fast. Some people love them and amaze me with how they can toss the car around
That's a very ironic statement, considering they've been doing just that, since the early 2000s.
Almost all of their GT RS cars set record around the ring, when they were launched.
Some were even created expressly for that purpose, like the 997 GT2 RS, which was designed to beat the GT-R lap time.
most effective experience on a track day? that's sarcasm, right?
It’s funny because I know what you mean with this comment but you can also apply the opposite based on perspective. They are record setters based on pure numbers. They find out the bare minimum (pure number) they need to set a record. They do that. And then they go and set a record haha.
Never cared much for Porsche until I started getting into road course stuff. After my first cayman s I really started to appreciate what they build. Not many cars off the dealer floor can take track beating like a porsche over and over again. Caymans are definitely my fave of the choices though
C6 Z06 is another good track choice
@@dilsher12 yeah for sure. Even a c5 zo6 is a bargain track car right now
I wish the early Caymans didn't have oiling issues at their limits tho
@@wolfgang_h3t yeah I had a 987s was gonna do a ls swap on at 100k miles but decided to do a frs instead since all the other parts for the car cost less
The constantly lead manufacturers in reliability.. always close to the top which is amazing as the vehicles they produce are all performance vehicles and not your 240hp Camry.
I'm so glad Porsche is getting the recognition it deserves from the whole car community. In terms of drivers cars, these are the best.
>is getting
Like noone knows before lol
@@maximborodyuk3773 True car enthusiasts know but up until recently, all the "car guys" did not pay attention to porsches.
@@greaser3069 you must be like 12…EVERY BODY KNOWS ABOUT PORSCHE!!
The bad part is that is making prices increase rapidly
Greaser, you don’t know what you are talking about. In the ‘70s Porsche sent out a notice to its dealers to be nice to Datsun Z owners because many only owned a Z because it was all they could afford at that time but what they wanted was a 911.
As a huge Porsche fan I really enjoyed this. I love the behind the scenes information you get from chatting to the Porsche engineers about why they did things the way they did. So cool.
They finally gave their car that has the engine where it belongs enough power! We all knew they were holding the Cayman back all those years. I owned a 987.2 and the handling was amazing.
I do think the Cayman was supposed to be a less powerful version of the 911, kinda of an entry level to the performance cars. Giving 400+ HP to a newbie is dangerous
@@alpenfoxvideo7255 nobody is buying a GT4 RS or even a GT4 as their first car lol.
Anyone remember Clarkson's brilliant review of the "Coxster" (Cayman) from way back? He lamented the fact that the Cayman wasn't as good as it could be, and put up a chart, showing how it's power was neatly snuggled in between the Boxster & 911. 😃
I love how you can hear the roar of the the intake, it's not coming through the car speakers, and I'll bet it is pretty quiet outside of the car. Porsche for the win! Thank you for sharing Jason!
I'd be surprised if this car has speakers at all. The motor would drown them out and you're supposed to be driving, not listening to classic rock.
This is why I love Porsche. They go above and beyond! And they’re just perfect!!
Oh My God, that sound. The GT3RS was already on the top for my dream list I think the GT4RS just knocked it to 2nd...
Yeah
sameee
I loved Porsche also
Angels start singing at 8500 RPM.
@@smithiness ain't that the truth, 9k rpm 6 banger n/a God what an engine. Only thing that ive heard in terms of cars that can beat that is probably that lfa v10 purr and my personal favourite rotaries. 😍 don't get me wrong supercharger whines are up there but man high reving engines are just engineering masterpiece and musically orgasmic for lack of a better word
Best looking CAR ever build. That's what I dreamt of 30-40 years ago, playing with our matchbox toy cars on the floor.
I’m glad you did this video while driving. It’s more entertaining seeing you drive around a track while *explaining the science* .
*That GT4 RS sounds amazing* 🤯
was just thinking the same thing!!!!
Porsche has been putting out some amazing cars to round out the end of internal combustion.
Look around you ice isn’t dead
Beautiful video, Jason. Love that you filmed this at Willow Springs.
Congratulations. I'm so glad this channel is growing so well, great to see a channel get the recognition they deserve.
Loved the description and visuals on the power difference between this and the gt3
I was expecting some April fools video today like "how you can recharge a Tesla battery with your urine"
Underrated comment
Damn, you mean you can’t?
So I’ve been pissing on Teslas for a couple of years to no effect. Damn, damn, damn.
The 4th video that I see on that car, this one is the only one witch not only got me actual info but answered all my question.
Thumbs up
Thanks for doing the hard work of evaluating the GT4RS.
I'm so glad you got to do a video on this engine again!
It's just so good!
Beautiful car! That sound is delicious 🤩
Any form of this fabulous 4 liter is 1 glorious sounding mill regardless of what application its in! The GT4 is my fav flavor of Porsche!
Such freat presentation! No uhs or ums, technical while driving too. 10/10
When are you doing an in depth feature on this engine mate? I clicked on this because that’s what I was hoping to see….your usual excellent discussion of design elements…
I've been dreaming of this car ever since the 4.0 engine was made.
Great review of an incredible car! That beast gives me the shivers! I can only imagine what it was like feeding her the beans.
Man.... that glorious sound of the flat six!
What a great way to kick off a video! That engine sounds amazing when launched
I love swan neck wing mounts!
I did a final project on them for a fluid class. RC scale model simulation and 3d printed model for wind tunnel testing to validate the simulation.
oh we need a video on that. seriously.
that engine sound is mesmerizing
Loving this kind of car reviews !!!
Such a good review
Thanks, Eric!
I just got a 997.2 earlier this week. Crazy how I'm seeing all these Porsche videos pop up all of a sudden. I love it already. Wish I could afford this one!!
You’re seeing them because the car just got released.
I would want this and a toyota gr supra
Keep your 997.2
@@JuanPabloRiojasGaming no, I'm not talking about this particular gt4rs. I'm talking about Porsche videos in general. Haven't even looked up Porsche videos on TH-cam under this account, so I don't know why it's been recommended all of a sudden.
congrats on the 7.2, last of the analogue rides. if u ever wondered if u were being watched, Porsche is watching you now, haa. enjoy!
Amazing video Jason. Great car
best review so far
When I want to see solid reviews of an exciting high performance car, all I need is, 1 from you and 1 with Chris Harris at the wheel and on the mic. Chris’ for the amusing hyperbole, wit and awesome driving footage; yours for the no-nonsense, perspectives that we Engineers all appreciate.
I was most interested in those goose-necked spoiler supports. Your mention of Laminar flow led me into deep thoughts on spoilers surfaces and tripped turbulent airflow. Perhaps it would be better to have airfoils stick straight out from the sides of the bumper. Cars would be hella wide, and more dangerous than ever, but think of that unobstructed airflow. Thank you for the video!
the sides of the car probably generate more turnbulence than the top, with wheel arches, wheels, etc
you wouldn't get the same surface anyway as a rear spoiler. plus increasing frontal area. as long as its high enough, rear spoiler seems just better. at least for the rear downforce
Or just have the supports at the ends of the wing, all the way out to the fenders! Think Plymouth Roadrunner. Then stack them 6 tall like Wingo from the Pixar movie Cars.
@@DurfDiggler - Yes - that's the answer. Look at modern F1 cars. And the Ferrari F40
@@DurfDiggler yes, as the end supports can act as fences. 👍
Amazing car! Those Michelin Cup 2Rs are legit. Picking up 5-6 seconds just because of tires is insane.
Definitely the best driver's sports car made in a very long time. Looking forward to owning one of these one day.
As a suggestion, please consider doing a video on the difference between the EA9A1 And the EA9A2Evo engine. As we know, the EA9A2Evo engine used in the GT4 is a bespoke engine with the same bore to stoke ratio as the EA9A1 engine. I’m very Curious in why the EA9A1 engine seems to be a more superior engine?
Great video btw. Best channel ever
Man it's my dream to drive a Porsche on a track it would be amazing
Love your work 👍
It's looks and sounds amazing
I've owned a Model S P100D for a couple years but this is fuc*ing better!!
"A perfect engine is something that every internal combustion engine maker should strive for, regardless of gold and silver."
- Aiam A. Puerschafian
Top notch analysis.
It's an amazing machine!
I’m one of the biggest EV supporters (Fan boy if you wish), have been my entire life. Yet I can/do still appreciate an awesome machine like this! The performance and sound ROCK!
Not sure why most feel they need to be either EV or ICE…
Thanks for the vid Jason!
The new EV racecar concept by Porsche is built on the Cayman platform...and the next gen Cayman/Boxster is going to be electric...
Different ways to look at this video. To me the main takeaway was ”why do we even bother with combistion engines anymore?”
I mean yes this Porsche is truly impressive and amazing, but it takes this pinnacle of engineering to be ”almost in ev territory” in responsiveness. And we’re talking 50-100k EV vs 150k petrol car.
Evs are gay
While I find the hypocrisy of the "lightweight" fabric door polls next to the power window controls a great example of marketing trumping engineering at Porsche, I have to say this is the ultimate Porsche for me. Just wish it wasn't so pricy :-/
porsche knows exactly what strings they can tug on and still not piss anyone off. either way i work on these for a living and that window regulator in the regular gt4 is all of 3.5 lbs. id say power windows adds 15lbs across the platform. big whoop.
Definitely my dream car!! I'm on my second Porsche. I'd LOVE to make this one my third!
Car goes vroom 🤤. ICE until I die.
Jason, maybe sometime you can do a compare/contrast video on the various types of transmission and the terminology employed - manual, automatic, semi-automatic, sequential, H-shift, torque converter, no torque converter, torque converter that can be shifted manually, no torque converter that can shift automatically, two-pedal, three pedal, two-pedal manual, etc. - explaining advantages and disadvantages of each in various contexts. Or maybe videos.
EDIT: Forgot to mention that the motivation for this off topic comment was the fact that I had to go look up PDK transmission. I drive a car with a torque converter automatic that lets me shift manually if I want to. I like this because I’m not wearing out my old left knee constantly pumping a clutch pedal in traffic. But unlike the “real” manuals I grew up with, this transmission babysits me by downshifting automatically so that I don’t lug down or stall the engine when I’m slowing down (but will let me rev as high as I want without automatically upshifting). Are there torque converter automatics that don’t do this? Also, are there two-pedal “real” manuals - i.e., the driver does not have to manually engage the clutch when starting moving from a stop?
I have videos on most of these subjects. :) th-cam.com/play/PL7B5B6479699EB204.html
On your edit, VAG's DSG (direct shift gearbox) is an automatic gearbox without a torque converter, dual clutches which are computer controlled, two pedal driving - they have 'manual' mode which also doesn't shift unless you're at the top or bottom of the safe RPM range.
In terms of the babysitting, what would you prefer the vehicle do instead of downshifting? the alternatives are to use more engine power (in a range still safe) or stall out - both of these options aren't really safe or comfortable. In first gear, the transmission losses in fluid coupled automatics allow the wheels to be stationary while the engine still rotates, at the 'cost' of heating the working fluid
@@stefanvanzyl9090 Thanks for the reply. Back in the day I stalled my 3-pedal manuals a few times not getting the clutch fully disengaged in time. Came with the territory and didn’t seem to be that much of a safety issue. But I understand the point on a torque converter xmission. So when Jason and others say they are so happy that manufacturer A has put a “manual transmission” in their model B car because they personally prefer manual xmissions - a comment you hear very often - are they talking about (1) no torque converter, (2) 3 pedals even if one “pedal” is a paddle on the steering wheel to operate the clutch, (3) either sequential or H-pattern, (4) either single clutch assembly or dual/multi clutch (5) lever or paddle shifters on the steering wheel or both; OR does it have to be (1) no torque converter, (2) 3 ACTUAL pedals, (3) H-pattern only, (4) single clutch assembly, (5) lever only?
@@EngineeringExplained Jason, may I request you help check out the Punch powertrain dt1 transmission.
@@robertbutsch1802 I can't speak for Jason (or any other reviewer) - I just know that driving a fluid coupled automatic isn't fun at all for me. It feels slow, disconnected and unresponsive. I personally drive a Jetta with a DSG, and have plenty of experience with manuals, CVTs, fluid coupled autos, DSG and a dual clutch manual C4 ZR1 - i absolutely prefer the DSG as first place, and the ZR1's dual clutch as second place.
The draw of a manual transmission is mostly related to being the polar opposite of the "generic" automatic transmission feeling, and secondly believing to be in "full control" of the vehicle.
I put it in inverted commas because cars these days prompt us when to shift anyway, meaning that the car's computer still gets what *it* wants, we oblige - New VW manuals are also able to restart the engine automatically if it stalled, just after you press the clutch - sort of like an extension stop-start feature. other vehicles may also offer this, I don't know.
Single clutch manuals are slower to shift and less fuel efficient than DSG in almost all circumstances where the weight and size difference would be inconsequential
I don’t care how efficient this is vs an ev, that sound and I can fix it in my own garage which are things they want to go away.
Man that scream.. gives me goosebumps 🤤
Great vid, bro
Perfect N/A car, with an Engineered titanium exaust. hmm maybe beyond perfection.
Can we get uncut footage of you doing the push laps in it?
Shoot, not a bad idea; should have uploaded them to my second channel. Thanks for the idea!
@@EngineeringExplained you got a second channel?? Must subscribe!
Yeah, I’d be into that, if there’s anything notable I wouldn’t mind a little voiceover.
Porsche is making some sick cars , they keep dreams alive .
The colors of the cars are amazing. Especially that blue.
It's interesting that they can get away with MacPherson struts in such a sporty car. Obviously it doesn't have much suspension travel meaning the geometry doesn't change very much.
My thoughts exactly but it’s crazy that the Miata and most Audis come standard with it. And some acuras.
@Karlavilizar Smithjonesmartinez yeah I meant to say it’s crazy that the Miata and Audis come with double in front and multi link in the rear standard thank you
Hi Jason, just wondering, could you explain why some cars have 1" bigger wheels at the back? Like, why, when it's the front wheels that need more brake clearance? Thanks
@@nidhishshivashankar4885 But then why do drag cars use like 15” wheels? It’s because more sidewall = better straight-line grip
From Lamborghini:
*_"Having a larger diameter rear wheel increases the amount of rubber that contacts the road along the axis of the vehicle which increases your acceleration potential. When you accelerate, much of your vehicle’s weight shifts to the rear. By comparison, the front wheels don’t need as large a contact patch to take care of steering and braking."_*
Thing of beauty
This was very good Jason...
Love Porsche and really enjoy your videos on them and all things engineering! A great library of information and good content.
If I have one complaint it is this: If you are going to state facts and figures such as the weight/mass of a vehicle etc, then please pop up some text with the metric equivalent of lbs alongside your regular graphics! You've done it before so I'm not bothered that much in this video as I am unlikely to ever own an GT4 RS.
The rest of the world has no idea what you are talking about when quoting lbs, so kilogrammes or even in grams of you prefer would be much appreciated!
Keep up the great education! Sow those engineering seeds! Love it
Interesting analysis on the carbon wheels, cool to know the thought process on those. So why did they include carbon ceramic brakes when Porsche has explicitly said that steel brakes are better for track cars?
I wouldn't say steel brakes are "better" for track cars, they're just significantly cheaper. Sized appropriately, they can handle the heat. The big advantage of carbon rotors is the weight. Takes out a huge amount of unsprung, rotating mass. That's great for so many performance reasons. Full details here: th-cam.com/video/VBd9y3mxzCM/w-d-xo.html
"Carbon" wheels, as far as I know, are CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced polymer). So they're just strong plastic, which can't take much heat. Carbon brake rotors are pure carbon, no plastic. Which takes lots of heat.
@@EngineeringExplained totally understand the weight aspect, I only find it interesting that Porsche specifically says they recommend heavy track users to go with steel brakes but put carbon brakes on this track day special. And then also have a reason for not going with carbon wheels based on track use.
@@soaringvulture carbon ceramic is what the rotors are made of. It's carbon fiber, binders, silicon, etcs. So not technically pure carbon but primarily carbon yes.
@@dbeckMSP brakes and wheels are not the same. Any curb or damage to the wheels can result in catastrophic failure. Brakes are much more resilient and protected
As far as your content, I really missed the EE part, this felt more like a top gear review. Would love to know a bit more about the clever engineering parts
Very nice video, mate!
I am pretty sure the immediate response is more of a question of calibration than of the individual throttle bodies. On the old Audi S4 4.2 NA engine you could literally feel how the throttle opened very slowly to avoid jerks in the driveline. Horrible!
Electric motors are 2-3x more efficient than ICE --- but have to move a car that weighs 50% more due to battery weight
There, I fixed it for you.
In the case of the car he owns (Model 3 Performance (4200lbs)). So about 33% more weight, and that's comparing it to a high end sports car. If you take the last sedan I had (Kia Stinger GT), which is a better comparison, you're at almost the same weight (4000lbs). Same 0-60 time for the Tesla and the Porsche (3.2 seconds). Waaaaay more practical with no transmission and very little maintenance. Of course the Porsche will be quicker around a track, but the Model 3 does pretty well for $85k less which means normal people can actually buy one. The only thing electrics need to catch up on is range. The Tesla is at best around 200 miles at highway speeds.
One of my dream cars! I was driving a 987 Cayman, always wish can have a ultimate Cayman, here it is!
Of course 991 GT2RS and GT3RS on the list, haha!
What an amazing machine!
They should of kept the 7 reverse gears
The DAF Daffodil used a CVT and could go as fast in reverse as it did go forwards. That opened up the possibility for an entirely new class of motor sports - Daffodil racing in reverse.
This is the car you would keep for life. Especially since internal combustion engines are going extinct very soon.
Aaaw, don't hold your breath!
You are living the dream, brah!
What a beautiful car. I like when he actually lets it run through the gears and shift. That's the fastest shifts I have ever heard. Blip.... Blip.. it's in the next gear before it's left the last is sounds like.
It's a dual clutch transmission. It *is* in the next gear before it has left the last one!
This would be the perfect car with a manual gearbox and a manual handbrake
I have NO idea why they are pushing electronic handbrake. It's not reliable.
@@AutumnWind92 even if it IS reliable, it’s no fun.
it's sad that naturally aspirated engines have become so rare. i enjoy a 100ps na engine more than a 190ps turbo engine
No just no. The only time na is better for me is in a much larger capacity engine such as a 3.5l V6 and bigger .
Glad to hear the km/h references in the end it makes things so much easier, American engineering analyst here by the way. It is amazing VW finally green lighted a car like this, so much more fun/cost ratio than almost anything out there, with all the factory C8s, Zupras, Camaros and Mustangs I see at trackdays recently I am sure they are trying to cash in on the cheaper fun car segment.
Not sure how cheap these are. Saw one recently for 911Turbo S money from ten years ago. All of those other vehicles will be significantly less.
Nice 👍🏻. It really looks and sounds good
I’ll still take the slower model to get a real manual gearbox.
Hi Jason. Great video report. Thoughts on your comments and the questions you raised.
1. Having more aggressive gearing on all Cayman models. I suspect that this has more to do with brand-wide emission regulations than anything else. The fewer "dirtier" cars they sell (e.g. with close gear ratios) the fewer electric powered vehicles they have to sell to offset it.
2. As you would know, the stiffer the springs, the less problematic the compromises (e.g. toe-in & camber change) inherent in MacPherson struts become.
3. Moving the engine from rear to mid. Of course, In the old days we'd just invert the transmission and modify the casing as required 🙂
I would like to hear more about differential. 718 caymans have platted diffs, with two friction plates on both sides, and really interesting ramps (more agresive on engine braking then on the acceleration).
I have opened mine few days ago to change friction plates because they started slipping, and I think it's too small and has the same oil with gears on the PDK which stops me from using 75w140 just for that diff.
That is a video with wonderful visuals, but all I heard was: 'Excitement, excitement, excitement'. Please have a version with commentary, thank you 😋
That's the most consistent request/"complaint" is that shorter gearing would be more fun but it seems to be otherwise a pinnacle of fantastic engineering. Can't wait to get mine!
beautiful wheels
As a Cayman owner I must say, I love this video.
Just a perfect car
Such an awesome car!
Great Video!
Wow that launch gave me goosebumps 🤣
Hey Jason..Nice video. Please make a comparison video about the differences between performance engines of the same company..for example porsche bmw AMG...thanks
Intoxicating sound at 9,000 rpm. Addictive, pure adrenaline, only suitable for circuits and experienced people at the controls.
that SMILE during the launch :D
WOW my take away from this is. I didn't know that, thank you. AND WOW what an amazing car I hope I get a chance to drive one!
Beautiful car. ❤