The massacre is in the Bible, aren’t what you think

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @durg8909
    @durg8909 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Passages like this are why I so strongly reject the claim that the Bible is inerrant. This reeks of human corruption. I find it troubling that we can’t just admit that.

    • @bigmoniesponge
      @bigmoniesponge 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      it definitely seems like the israelites justifying what they did by saying god ordered it

    • @ronaldharris6569
      @ronaldharris6569 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It's in the bible so it has to be right. Skeptics and free thinkers go on evidence that's why bible based morality has no impact their values and culture

  • @chrissnyder4439
    @chrissnyder4439 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Right...
    Creation story: myth
    Adam & Eve: myth
    Global flood: myth
    Mass Jewish enslavement by Egypt: myth
    Jonah: myth
    War against Midian: myth
    So many stories within the Bible that never happened, and y'all somehow thing this is the inerrant word of god?

    • @shakeyj4523
      @shakeyj4523 17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Unicorns: Myth
      Giants: Myth
      Talking donkeys: Myth
      Birthplace of Jesus: Myth
      Men with Magic hair: Myth
      Flat Earth: Myth
      Eyeball covered angels: Myth
      Free Will: Myth
      Moses existing: Myth
      Satan: Myth
      Antichrist: Myth
      Ok, I'm tired. I think we should have listed what isn't myth. It would have been a much, much shorter list, and we haven't even covered half the myths in the Bible.

  • @ronaldharris6569
    @ronaldharris6569 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    A war crime is a war crime. Genocide and sexual slavery is never right. Faith doesn't mean you have to call something wrong, right

    • @shakeyj4523
      @shakeyj4523 17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

      Good people do good things. Bad people do bad things. But for good people to do bad things, it takes religion.

  • @ronaldharris6569
    @ronaldharris6569 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Before you ask is the bible account true first a sceptic asks was moses an actual person

  • @GrammeStudio
    @GrammeStudio 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    i bet they argue it didn't happened because they couldn't find archeological evidence for it.
    which means they'd have to dismiss a lot of other historical accounts that didn't have physical evidence.
    some tried to pull the same with book of job. what is the moral lesson even supposed to be? that massacre is not above the creator?
    it is the way of the ancients? but didn't they have the privilege of direct guidance from the divine? why shouldn't we expect more of them?
    it's not anachronism to expect them to live up to the standards of objective morality when they're in fact so close to the arbiter of objective morality!
    they have literal prophets! that'd be like us having jesus living among us telling us directly whether abortion is moral or not without us having to perform exegesis and risking eigesis
    it's suspect. because unlike genesis 1. these do not read like mythology. so no, "these are mere literature" will not work for these passages

    • @chronolith420
      @chronolith420 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      "These are mere literature" will always work for any passage in the bible because that is exactly what it is. You seriously believe a bunch of random men were directly talked to by god and told to write a book about him😂 grow tf up and think for yourself for once instead of regurgitating this slop that was passed on to you since birth.

  • @robertpowers9317
    @robertpowers9317 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    What did you just say? Are you trying to justify what is being taught here? This is just bs.

    • @ronaldharris6569
      @ronaldharris6569 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      That is exactly what he is saying. I feel bad for him because he seems like a nice guy but if you are making excuses for atrocities then you are wrong

  • @KennethKlein-lc2mk
    @KennethKlein-lc2mk 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    War is still waged that way in much of the world.

  • @Straya92
    @Straya92 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    People love to cry about the past... if they were true to themselves they would acknowledge their own pasts faults.
    Unrightous hypocricy.
    Christ is God ☦️
    Peopke conveniently remember the saviour part but forget the Lord part.
    God is not subject to our laws, we are subject to his.

    • @stephenheading2925
      @stephenheading2925 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, except the laws that forbid the kind of actions that God commands himself in the Bible were created by God. It he is all-loving, then why is he so willing to kill children, and why can’t be do that today if the word of God is objective snd timeless? I don’t think you get to say „well you did bad things in past so my bad things (like the murder of innocent children) are justified“.

  • @shakeyj4523
    @shakeyj4523 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    If you want to be really accurate, the very first words in the Bible should be: "This actually didn't happen". Then you don't have to do it for each nonsensical story.

  • @leadingedgeknifeandtoolsha4128
    @leadingedgeknifeandtoolsha4128 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    first, you look cold, maybe a bigger jacket next time. i would have accepted these massacres as allegory, never really happened but meant to teach you something. that's a reasonable way to look at it, they were told to do something, they didnt do it, here is some extreme problem solving, no problem its a story. but the way you are looking at is that " though a cultural lens" your god has complete disregard of human life and he is willing to command people to kill children and women, who the Israelites took, as what can only be assumed, as slaves, but keep the female virgins as slaves. I wonder what those newly captured female slaves are going to be used for? you stated you are a deep skeptic, how do you justify a loving god and this story and all the other stories of genocide, cruelty, and slavery?

    • @shakeyj4523
      @shakeyj4523 17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      If you have to go to those lengths to make something acceptable, it's not.

  • @_S0me__0ne
    @_S0me__0ne วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hahaha. Sheesh. The contortions you're doing.
    Is the story an example of how people thought back then? Yes. But, the larger implications are that such passages expose just how man-made the Bible is and more so the religion(s) that developed from it. It creates a very mannish god, not unlike every other god.
    In addition, if the Bible is to be taken truly, as a lot of Christians have and do, then it describes a very horrible god that is excused away.
    And, after all of this, we're supposed to find and take spiritual meaning and guidance from it, often something completely contradictory to what we're reading?!
    This is why I stopped believing. When I realized how made up the entire thing is, and how much people have made up what the Bible means. You call yourself a skeptic, but also a pastor, and you're doing the same thing.
    One person's exegesis is another's eisegesis and thousands of denominations and millions of people aren't wrong, but the other person and denomination is.
    The Bible is nothing more than the world's greatest piece of mythic, semi-historical fiction.

  • @kameelffarag
    @kameelffarag 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You disappoint me, it is the nonsensical that you believe. When you read any book you read it not from the cultural value, but from Bod’s value instilled in your conscious and morals. So you can follow Jesus who said search the books, and in another place do bot believe every thing. The Torah is not from God, period full stop .

    • @shakeyj4523
      @shakeyj4523 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      To be fair, nothing is "from god" because there is no evidence that anything supernatural exists.

    • @ronaldharris6569
      @ronaldharris6569 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You are funny 😂