man, he didn't even write this dialogue and it becomes a meme, is this really just how George talks? He always talks and writes in memes, he's meme god
There is some great work done on those movies but come on man, most of the CGI creatures in Attack of the clones look like their made of plastic particularly Dexter from the dinner scene. They also made a mistake of not making a clone trooper costume because every time one of the clones takes their helmet off it looks like their heads aren't connected correctly and are quite floaty.
@@CraigBickerstaff I highly disagree with you I think Dexter and all the creatures look 100% real I should say all the characters that is CGI. The prequel trilogy still looks 100% real to me probably just most of it is real real sets real miniatures etc. Watch some of the documentaries on the DVDs in particular. And the Blu-rays breathing really making a book everything is spelled out for you right there
@@darthqui-gon5986 Look, don't fucking talk down your nose at me like that. I was learning CG around the time that Episode III was in production and I've always been the sort of person who devours the BHS material and I do this for all the films that let me not just the prequel trilogy. I've seen the work that they were doing at Weta on the Lord of the Rings, and compared to the work that ILM has done since the prequels the stuff done on Episode II is showing it's age. I didn't shit on the work, It's good for its time but even at it's time the character work wasn't up to scratch with the stuff Weta was doing on Golem. You look at all the character stuff in 2002 movies and they all have the same plastic look that you see from the characters in Episode II. That doesn't take away from the miniatures work that they did on that movie it's just showing its age and I think it's disingenuous of you to oversell it like this.
@@CraigBickerstaff wasn't trying to talk down to you. It's so easy to take things as the wrong message when you're writing a text. Simply put in my opinion I think the prequels look 100% photo-realistic and a hell of a lot better the most movies have been made in the past 15 years and I did not like the effects in The Lord of the Rings I didn't even like the movies but I love the books
Getting everything you want is problematic. Having less is when you have to get more creative and think outside the box. Art from adversity is where the real 'magic' happens.
You can argue about the quality of these movies all day but it's hard to deny there isn't a lot of creativity on screen at basically all times in the Prequels.
@@VinVonVoom yes I agree with that, James Cameron made the same point when asked about the sequel films. There just needed to more collaboration, someone challenging George like in the originals which pushes creativity even further when thinking outside the box. Diamonds are made under pressure.
'I don't really have to reign myself in anymore' well, if that doesn't explain everything about the prequels in one quote i don't know what does Remember, limitations are the genesis of creativity
The irony is that he actually had plenty of limitations just from having the original trilogy there to dictate certain aspects of the story. He chose to ignore that as well! The result is that he had to go back and make even MORE changes for the DVD release. Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru should have been much bigger characters in the prequels but based on Attack of the Clones Anakin barely even spoke to either of them. Obi Wan describes Anakin as a warm loving friend but in the prequels, he's a self-obsessed arrogant jerk. George didn't even bother to cast a Jango who can do an American accent so that it would fit with Bobba.
@@CraigBickerstaff Should have been? They don't own you anything. If Anakin knew them well, he would find Luke. And yes, Obi-Wan and Anakin were close friends, rewatch episode 3.
This is why they started showing previz/videomatics to the actors on set during Episode II. They also made sure that the eye lines are all correct. Sometimes a table tennis ball on a stick or c-stand is enough to achieve that.
Even today I don't consider 95% of effects-heavy movies "photorealistic". Most stuff tries to be realistic but at the same time it's so bold, therefore Hyperrealism would be the better term to describe it.
I like the prequels but George definitely went way overboard with using CG for absolutely everything. It made the acting suffer, and it so much of it looks fake that it can be distracting. Can you imagine how hard it must be to have a conversation with a digital character and they don't even bother having the voice actor on set so they can work off of each other?
In terms of film technology it was most certainly revolutionary, but like many visionaries later directors took what George had started and refined/regulated it to reach maximum potential. George did the heavy lifting proving the technology existed and bringing into the world, but with time other directors have recognized the flaws of that technology and found ways to maximize the benefits of CGI without having it become a detriment.
Sam, you obviously have not watched much of the documentary footage. I've seen plenty of voice actors on prequel sets. Lucas "bothered" to do that. How many of these webisodes have you watched? Everything you complained about has been contradicted repeatedly by what I've seen in these documentaries especially the CGI. They spent millions on sets and models that were NOT cgi.
Star Wars has always been about pushing the envelope with special effects and good story telling. It has never been about acting. The prequels actually have a better story than the originals.
@@brucewayne1662 Never been about the acting? Irvin Kershner and Richard Marquand were hired specifically because George thought they'd be better at working with the actors.
@@CraigBickerstaff Did you not see Ian McDiarmid and Ewan McGregor in the prequels? Their acting was far better than people like Han or Leia in the originals.
+Qweg Qweg To be fair, these films did advance what could be done with CGI at the time. They were responsible for a lot of technical VFX breakthroughs, it's just unfortunate that the look of the films kind of suffered as a result.
Episode I had a puppet Yoda in the theatrical release. It was later replaced with CGI for the digital/home releases. Without the PT, there wouldn't be the effects in you see in Endgame etc today. The ST is full of CGI
This just comes off sad now. Episode II is at least arguably the worst Star Wars movie in existence. between the god-awful script and the incredibly dated looking special effects it does not hold up at all.
PT movies cinemascore A- Solo cinemascore A- TROS cinemascore B+ EDIT FOR ILL INFORMED: Cinemascore involves polling the audience as they leave the theatre, and is used by the industry to get a general consensus on the popularity of the movie during theatrical release. It is not a review, and not altered after opening weekend.
i think the story development is the thing to focus on there. the fx are ok to good, and there are great cinematic moments, think about yodas battle or the chase of that assasin and how obi wan cant control anakin and the arena battle. of course the fx are dated. its almost 20 years ago
@@1080lights the original comment is pretty useless. Episode 2 is not even close to the worst episode thanks to the three assembly line horse shit movies that Disney spat out. It introduced world building which left a legacy whose cultural impact was greater than most movies have ever had. Kindly, fuck yourself.
@Crusty783 You're not aware what Cinemascore is then; it's polling the audience AFTER they come out of the theatre. It's like asking you for your opinion. That's why I cited it. So your comment is LITERALLY irrelevant.
![[LIVE] นาทีนี้ต้องพี่ทนาย | ทนายแก้ว vs ทนายไพศาล | #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.47 (02/11/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HmquaO-PL_M/mqdefault.jpg)
*Disney disregard George's story treatments*
George: "Locked out, even I can't get past the security"
man, he didn't even write this dialogue and it becomes a meme, is this really just how George talks? He always talks and writes in memes, he's meme god
"Now wat do I do?" "Lock out! Even I can't get past the security" lolz!!
now ILM have the high ground!
He predicted his future involvement in Star Wars after he sold out to Disney.
George Lucas is a creative genius!
Yes I agree 🥰❤️
I really believe George Lucas was ahead of his time. He makes films exactly the way he wants.
STAR WARS RULES👍🏻
I love how didactic the b-roll on these are. "Raising the bar" [on screen person holding pole]
Jordan bickett is that what you think didactic means?
Really thought saying "didactic" would make you look smarter lol
Love that bit with Obi-wan fighting the Genosis Monsters that are'nt in the movie right now.
Magic, the secret ingredient to star wars
Something tells me that cup George was holding had vodka in it.
+Zoomer30 Then why wasn't it in the news?
“A special effect is a tool, a means of telling a story. A special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing.”
-George in the 70s
Yep, and he used them to tell a great story in all his films.
“I don’t really have to reign myself in any more.”
**rein
and that's the problem
3:26 TIMMY!
The effects in the PT still look 100% photo-realistic!!! And better then most movies made today.
There is some great work done on those movies but come on man, most of the CGI creatures in Attack of the clones look like their made of plastic particularly Dexter from the dinner scene. They also made a mistake of not making a clone trooper costume because every time one of the clones takes their helmet off it looks like their heads aren't connected correctly and are quite floaty.
@@CraigBickerstaff I highly disagree with you I think Dexter and all the creatures look 100% real I should say all the characters that is CGI. The prequel trilogy still looks 100% real to me probably just most of it is real real sets real miniatures etc. Watch some of the documentaries on the DVDs in particular. And the Blu-rays breathing really making a book everything is spelled out for you right there
@@darthqui-gon5986 Look, don't fucking talk down your nose at me like that. I was learning CG around the time that Episode III was in production and I've always been the sort of person who devours the BHS material and I do this for all the films that let me not just the prequel trilogy. I've seen the work that they were doing at Weta on the Lord of the Rings, and compared to the work that ILM has done since the prequels the stuff done on Episode II is showing it's age. I didn't shit on the work, It's good for its time but even at it's time the character work wasn't up to scratch with the stuff Weta was doing on Golem. You look at all the character stuff in 2002 movies and they all have the same plastic look that you see from the characters in Episode II. That doesn't take away from the miniatures work that they did on that movie it's just showing its age and I think it's disingenuous of you to oversell it like this.
@@CraigBickerstaff wasn't trying to talk down to you. It's so easy to take things as the wrong message when you're writing a text. Simply put in my opinion I think the prequels look 100% photo-realistic and a hell of a lot better the most movies have been made in the past 15 years and I did not like the effects in The Lord of the Rings I didn't even like the movies but I love the books
And I think all three of the films aging nicely have you ever seen them on Blu-ray 4K they even look more realistic than they already do
YEAH
this recording really feels like it was recorded yesterday, camera and videos have no gone anywhere in the past 17 years
Getting everything you want is problematic. Having less is when you have to get more creative and think outside the box. Art from adversity is where the real 'magic' happens.
Bullshit.
@@Сайтамен exactly its all bullshit.
@@Сайтамен Its not bullshit. Its obvious.
You can argue about the quality of these movies all day but it's hard to deny there isn't a lot of creativity on screen at basically all times in the Prequels.
@@VinVonVoom yes I agree with that, James Cameron made the same point when asked about the sequel films. There just needed to more collaboration, someone challenging George like in the originals which pushes creativity even further when thinking outside the box. Diamonds are made under pressure.
'I don't really have to reign myself in anymore'
well, if that doesn't explain everything about the prequels in one quote i don't know what does
Remember, limitations are the genesis of creativity
He should've gotten some feedback from at least his friends. Maybe ask Spielberg.
The irony is that he actually had plenty of limitations just from having the original trilogy there to dictate certain aspects of the story. He chose to ignore that as well! The result is that he had to go back and make even MORE changes for the DVD release. Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru should have been much bigger characters in the prequels but based on Attack of the Clones Anakin barely even spoke to either of them. Obi Wan describes Anakin as a warm loving friend but in the prequels, he's a self-obsessed arrogant jerk. George didn't even bother to cast a Jango who can do an American accent so that it would fit with Bobba.
Odd, considering that the prequels were extremely creative.
@@CraigBickerstaff Why would Boba need to have the same accent as Jango? Lol
@@CraigBickerstaff Should have been? They don't own you anything. If Anakin knew them well, he would find Luke. And yes, Obi-Wan and Anakin were close friends, rewatch episode 3.
You can just tell all the actors had a hard time with the excessive digital stuff.
This is why they started showing previz/videomatics to the actors on set during Episode II.
They also made sure that the eye lines are all correct. Sometimes a table tennis ball on a stick or c-stand is enough to achieve that.
"photorealistic" was a bit of a stretch ...
Even today I don't consider 95% of effects-heavy movies "photorealistic". Most stuff tries to be realistic but at the same time it's so bold, therefore Hyperrealism would be the better term to describe it.
Honestly if you watch episode 2 and pretend it’s another clone wars episode it’s not that bad
I like the prequels but George definitely went way overboard with using CG for absolutely everything. It made the acting suffer, and it so much of it looks fake that it can be distracting. Can you imagine how hard it must be to have a conversation with a digital character and they don't even bother having the voice actor on set so they can work off of each other?
In terms of film technology it was most certainly revolutionary, but like many visionaries later directors took what George had started and refined/regulated it to reach maximum potential. George did the heavy lifting proving the technology existed and bringing into the world, but with time other directors have recognized the flaws of that technology and found ways to maximize the benefits of CGI without having it become a detriment.
Sam, you obviously have not watched much of the documentary footage. I've seen plenty of voice actors on prequel sets. Lucas "bothered" to do that. How many of these webisodes have you watched? Everything you complained about has been contradicted repeatedly by what I've seen in these documentaries especially the CGI. They spent millions on sets and models that were NOT cgi.
The prequels are the best Star Wars movies 😍😍
Instead of "pushing the envelope" with special effects George should have focused on story telling and acting !
Star Wars has always been about pushing the envelope with special effects and good story telling. It has never been about acting. The prequels actually have a better story than the originals.
@@brucewayne1662 Never been about the acting? Irvin Kershner and Richard Marquand were hired specifically because George thought they'd be better at working with the actors.
@@CraigBickerstaff Acting? Ian McDermid, Ewan McGregor, Christopher Lee, Liam Neeson were terrible? Lol...
@@CraigBickerstaff Did you not see Ian McDiarmid and Ewan McGregor in the prequels? Their acting was far better than people like Han or Leia in the originals.
LOL Dumb internet cliches
2:20 Ugly
It's all magic? Hahahahaha. They had to go back to puppets cause people hated the cgi so bad.
+Qweg Qweg To be fair, these films did advance what could be done with CGI at the time. They were responsible for a lot of technical VFX breakthroughs, it's just unfortunate that the look of the films kind of suffered as a result.
Episode I had a puppet Yoda in the theatrical release. It was later replaced with CGI for the digital/home releases.
Without the PT, there wouldn't be the effects in you see in Endgame etc today. The ST is full of CGI
@@Ruylopez778 He wasn't CGI in the home releases up until the 2011 blu-rays, in the VHS/DVD releases he was still a puppet.
@@TechnologicallyTechnical Didn't say he was. I didn't mention anything about DVD or VHS
@@Ruylopez778 You said digital/home releases... That's exactly what DVD/VHS are.
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA!!!!! Maga
This just comes off sad now. Episode II is at least arguably the worst Star Wars movie in existence. between the god-awful script and the incredibly dated looking special effects it does not hold up at all.
PT movies cinemascore A-
Solo cinemascore A-
TROS cinemascore B+
EDIT FOR ILL INFORMED: Cinemascore involves polling the audience as they leave the theatre, and is used by the industry to get a general consensus on the popularity of the movie during theatrical release.
It is not a review, and not altered after opening weekend.
i think the story development is the thing to focus on there. the fx are ok to good, and there are great cinematic moments, think about yodas battle or the chase of that assasin and how obi wan cant control anakin and the arena battle. of course the fx are dated. its almost 20 years ago
Carlos lol you’re such a whiny baby. Why do you say the same shit on every comment? Useless loser.
@@1080lights the original comment is pretty useless. Episode 2 is not even close to the worst episode thanks to the three assembly line horse shit movies that Disney spat out. It introduced world building which left a legacy whose cultural impact was greater than most movies have ever had. Kindly, fuck yourself.
@Crusty783 You're not aware what Cinemascore is then; it's polling the audience AFTER they come out of the theatre.
It's like asking you for your opinion.
That's why I cited it.
So your comment is LITERALLY irrelevant.