2017 Porsche Macan Turbo w/ Performance Pkg | Complete Review | With Steve Hammes | TestDriveNow

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @gothops154
    @gothops154 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I know I’m 4 years late here but I’m looking at some used ones. I gotta say I think *not* having keyless entry is a feature. The Porsche key is so cool and you’ll never have to touch it with keyless entry, which would be a waste on a such a cool key

  • @Aurora_v_cali
    @Aurora_v_cali 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    gotta love those swift shifts and cracking on down sifts.

  • @Arlind22
    @Arlind22 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Steve for putting back the MSRP at the description section. You are definitely paying for the brand name with this one.

  • @erniemartin603
    @erniemartin603 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can attest it’s as good as you say. The 2020 thru 2021 with PSE has an even better exhaust note despite the smaller displacement engine

  • @kmgates
    @kmgates 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent car. Excellent review. Thanks again, Steve.

  • @JadeaRS4
    @JadeaRS4 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is not the best review. The performance pkg gets the macan 0-60 in 3.7 -3.8. Not 4.2. The reg turbo is 4.3-4.4.

    • @stevehammes
      @stevehammes  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is not the best comment. The stated 0-to-60 mph time of the 2017 Macan Turbo with Performance Package is 4.2 w/ Sport Chrono, not 3.7-3.8. The regular Macan Turbo is 4.6 (4.4 with Sport Chrono.)

    • @numbereightyseven
      @numbereightyseven 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, no it doesn't. You're just wrong.
      For one thing, 10% more power is not going to improve acceleration by 15%. Use your brain.

  • @tungol00
    @tungol00 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    No push button start, ok but not so special interior, is kind of a downer for more than $100k can for me, though the engine and 4.2 secs 0-100km is a winner for me.

  • @HJ-bd2rr
    @HJ-bd2rr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That key or no push button, is one of the reason it is not that easy for this car to be stolen by thief with scanner

  • @TingTingMelody
    @TingTingMelody 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review!

  • @adrianharvey3908
    @adrianharvey3908 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can see the reason for this machine...good review steve...nothing more than a fun machine

    • @mauriceapollo8688
      @mauriceapollo8688 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I realize it is pretty randomly asking but do anyone know of a good website to stream newly released series online?

    • @julianmitchell3725
      @julianmitchell3725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Maurice Apollo Flixportal

    • @mauriceapollo8688
      @mauriceapollo8688 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Julian Mitchell thanks, signed up and it seems to work =) I really appreciate it!!

    • @julianmitchell3725
      @julianmitchell3725 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Maurice Apollo you are welcome xD

  • @hy77281
    @hy77281 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It may be exclusive when it comes to performance but in terms of design, this 100k turbo can easily be mistaken for a 50k base model Macan. There’s nothing about the interior and exterior of this car that makes you think it’s pushing 100k. Still think the Macan is one of the most elegant small SUVs you can buy, but at this price range I think buyers will expect more in terms of design.

    • @djsomeguy
      @djsomeguy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's half the point...the top performance version doesn't mean you want stupid over the top styling like what you see in most AMG cars for instance.

    • @renardnelson5456
      @renardnelson5456 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Macan S styling looks like an 80k vehicle to begin with. It simply oozes beauty and pedigree. So to pay 100k for performance upgrades has nothing to do with looks.

    • @JadeaRS4
      @JadeaRS4 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why would a person pay more for design?? That makes zero sense. You pay more for options, not for a front air damn that hardly does anything. An option is a bigger motor....

  • @khunopie9159
    @khunopie9159 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Helmut Von Porsche would be proud of this offering, especially in stunning cerulean, but I still think I'd take a Buick Enclave and use the cash savings for a downpayment on a helicopter or hovercraft
    3.75 zeppelins out of 5

  • @baldheadlogic
    @baldheadlogic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey Steve. This SUV seems like a boat load of fun for sure. However, pricing is kind of ridiculous especially with that interior design.

  • @chadc.5326
    @chadc.5326 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    alfa stelvio quadrafoglio base price of 79k 0-60 in 3.9 and top speed 177mph with a ferrari based motor.... ya id take the alfa!

    • @g.w.7893
      @g.w.7893 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      .... Until it breaks down.

  • @hamzaismail328
    @hamzaismail328 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    They charge this much for it .. Cuz simply they just can

    • @ayyo5971
      @ayyo5971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Worth it

  • @justrandomthings319
    @justrandomthings319 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about Android Auto? You only talked about Apple CarPlay.

    • @stevehammes
      @stevehammes  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Porsche does not play with Google at this time.

  • @telliesmith9825
    @telliesmith9825 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Porsche needs to cut that shit out almost 100gs Hell nah

  • @kumonetta
    @kumonetta 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Concise Info-tainment.

  • @emiliosman820
    @emiliosman820 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review and super on point...I am in the market for a Macan Turbo but used....they are a rip off in reality unless you buy used. The fact that Porsche nickel and dimes you is sickening...you are correct certain things should be standard at 90k! Shame on you Porsche....and plastic intake is sickening as well.

    • @stevehammes
      @stevehammes  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for checking it out!

  • @charlesrogers8420
    @charlesrogers8420 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is the point of the Macan?

    • @76carmel
      @76carmel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Carl Ratliff , It's Porsche's smaller crossover. It belongs to those who don't need need a Cayenne.
      At $98k, I'd would get a Cayenne.

    • @badimpulses17
      @badimpulses17 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      When you know you made it and this is what you can afford, that's the point.

    • @tubesforme99
      @tubesforme99 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s what you buy if you have a GT4. you live in Colorado and your 40 with a hot wife and a one kid. 😉

  • @9fiveb180
    @9fiveb180 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If its too much money for you, don't get one. And if you're one of those "car enthusiasts" who haven't actually owned or driven any of the vehicles you comment on......... You aren't qualified to say ANYTHING! You just regurgitate other peoples opinions from your super sweet gaming computer that probably needs to be wiped-down and disinfected. YOU'RE JUST PLAYING PRETEND!!!!

  • @MrNanah38
    @MrNanah38 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Be careful of their problematic TCase problems and oil leaks.

  • @itmustbelove08
    @itmustbelove08 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This car is this expensive with no sunroof? Damn Porsche and it’s a la carte pricing.

    • @76carmel
      @76carmel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Craig D - Oh, yeah. Porsche’s pricing is borderline ridiculous.

    • @djsomeguy
      @djsomeguy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's an option to have a panoramic sunroof or included if you get the Premium Plus package...this particular one was not even close to fully equipped.

  • @xxthehuskycaboosexx
    @xxthehuskycaboosexx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ll take an GLC63 AMG!

    • @BigBoss-ps6vk
      @BigBoss-ps6vk 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      xxthehuskycaboosexx both are nice suvs

  • @TheDonYG
    @TheDonYG 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those God damn wheels are too big for that suv smfh

  • @seanburns1982
    @seanburns1982 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would you want a bunch of driver assist crap on a Porsche? I think this guy is missing the point.

    • @stevehammes
      @stevehammes  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sean Burns Let’s get rid of ABS, traction controls and airbags too. I don’t need any of that stuff. I mean, charge me big $$$ but don’t give me stuff that’s standard on an Accord.

    • @seanburns1982
      @seanburns1982 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      To make a similarly ridiculous comparison, lets compare a 911 and a Ford Explorer. The Ford seats more people, has way more cargo space, ground clearance, etc and is way cheaper than the Porsche. The seats are even more comfortable! Can you believe a 911 can't even tow a boat? Why would anyone buy a 911? All sarcasm aside, If you want a luxury suv with a lot of advanced safety features buy a Volvo or a Benz, if you want a driver-focused, high performance car, then go for the Porsche. I mean you're reviewing the Turbo with performance package??? Do you really think those buyers want lane keep assist?

  • @afa6361
    @afa6361 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand why they make such a so called 100K SUV when the interior is average to say the most, no off-road capabilities, and small cargo space. Most buyers in this segment don't care about 0-60 mph rating anyway. Bad marketing.

    • @djsomeguy
      @djsomeguy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't understand because you're not the target market. If you want a big off road SUV go buy a Range Rover.

  • @foam27
    @foam27 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    soccer mom

  • @TWHISPERER
    @TWHISPERER 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This one is an Audi but I like it anyways.

    • @MrNanah38
      @MrNanah38 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Porsche engine and interior but yes the rest of it is Audi.

    • @TWHISPERER
      @TWHISPERER 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrNanah38 I see