I'm young. My first fire emblem experience was three houses, and while I knew that, it was making itself different with removing weapon triangle and the class system, but I absolutely loved it. Even now, with playing engage, I find a major difference in storytelling as well. Ultimately, I prefer three houses, for both the storytelling, and for the class system, as well as it being my first experience with the series.
Fire emblem 3 houses can be replayed in many times for different routes, i like the ending of verdant dear the most. I find flying unit is OP in 3 houses. Rn i am replaying 3 houses and still enjoy it.most of the game I play because i like the story telling.
I love this game so much i watched youtube game okay of all the older ganes getting to see all of them again just made me appreciate then tbat much more and my favorite character woukd be chrom and corrin with out thinking twice i love this game its a masterpiece and just hearing there trial themes made me feel so nostalgic
Yeah this game is great, from Engage I know more about characters from other fire emblem like Marth, Soren, Ike. Haha Chrom and robin are funny, our bond are far stronger than destiny. Yeah after 2-3 years engage will still be a good game and it set the new standard in gameplay for future fire emblem
I think that not having multiple endings is one of the big caveats that engage is missing Three houses has more characters as well But three houses is missing pvp which is a huge issue If three houses had pvp added and engage had multiple endings, that would fix these games missing pieces.
I agree, but one thing I mentioned that Fire Emblem Engage set a new standard for the next fire emblem coming. the main protagonist can speak is a big deal. this is the first time ever I have seen in Fire Emblem series
@@abrahamlee1 you can mod on PC or switch (its easier on PC). And if you read the tutorials you can create your own custom mods. I modified early units stats and statsgrowths so my Clanne could be as good as Ivy so I could get a little more diversity. Gamebanana is where you wanna go to get mods and learn how to mod FF Engage
@@abrahamlee1 yep, you can change almost everything... but some stuff is more difficult than others, for example: Add a new weapon to a certain class: "Royal knight now can use swords C" is waaaay more difficult to mod than "Clanne 55% magic growth rate" or "change might (+3) to silver arts"
Sounds like you would prefer a "7 things I don't like about Engage" video, which I can certainly make. It's not a perfect game by any means but there's a lot I like about it. When you say Lyn is mid, do you mean from a gameplay perspective or story? because I got a ton of utility out of her.
@@crimsoneternalflower6880game play? Lyn is considered an s tier emblem by many. Her pair up abilities are very strong, the duplicates are great on dodge tanks and creating walls, and the engage attack is very good at drawing bosses out towards at the start of the map.
@@crimsoneternalflower6880 all of my units are fighting to get Lyn. Anyone becomes a speed beast as soon as they’re paired up. Lyn, 3H, and Ike/Hector are easily the top 3 emblems. Which are your favorites and why? Now I’m curious… I think it’s very hard to mess up Lyn, how did you use her?
I love almost everything from engage but yeah coming back from 3H its quite a change, i get some people really didn't like the monastery but as it was my first time playing it i really enjoyed it, like going to talk with the students and they did say some stuff about whats going on in that month or how the story was, i played completly blind not knowing anything about the story and i really wanted to get the Edelgard route but as clueless i was i didn't get it lol, so i had to finish silver snow first then i looked how i was supposed to get it and i felt like a dumb dumb, but back to engage the story was boring... like really lame i get that you get new characters yeah its cool but FORCE you to use them in a new chapter and i believe we all can agree that the deployment cap is so short + you have to use the new fellas joining the team with no emblems or skills heck cant even earn some SP, and the veyle mind control is really fucked up at first i didn't like it but meh it felt like she was in her edgy phase lol, but yeah engage probably has so little replay potential like 3H which has new game + , and engage should've really got it but what would be the point other than maybe keep SP? skills? but in the end its like just breaking the game to the point that is not fun anymore, 3h you can transfer stuff but you dont get like giga broken to the point to trivialize the game (maybe lol i may be wrong tho) but yeah thats my personal opinion engage was fun but prob just a nostalgia trip to the old Lords and characters and someone didn't even make to be an actual Emblem lol (F for Alm, Eliwood, Shez, Elincia, and the Avatars Counter parts (Robin F , Byleth F, Corrin M ) maybe we get some emblems at some point but prob not and engage is done for til the next game or remake if its real lol i hope.
Yes 100% agree on the story telling, Three houses is way better than engage with multiple route you can pick. For the game play, it is not balance in 3 houses since bow is so OP to compare to other weapon types lol. you can just make everyone wyvern lord and using bow, if you see archer, just get off wyvern and you are safe, the Lvl cap in 3 houses is 99, but when you level character to around 50-60, he almost immortal at that point lol. Yeah the NG+ is the feature that make Fire emblem replayable. Unfortunately, Engage doesn't have NG+, that is the bad thing, the game developer think they will make it to let player coop online or fight online but it end up sad because doesn't matter how strong the team is, other player will just use Hortensia with Micaiah and entrap one by one until no one left in the battle. the AI in PVP is super dumb lol. I really enjoyed Fire Emblem Three houses for the depth in its contents. and Fire Emblem Engage for its gameplay haha. they are all good game and I definitely will play 3 houses again soon
I have only ever played two Fire Emblem games and the fact that Three Houses was my first really did impact how I viewed Engage. I’ll talk about what I really enjoyed about Engage before I get into why I much prefer Three Houses. I was really impressed with Engage’s animation. The bright colors and the action really just “popped” on the screen. In the beginning, I did get really interested in the story. That scene where the protagonist runs through that hallway while all his allies were battling to create a path for him was just really a sight to behold. I really loved how weapons didn’t break in this game. I was quite indifferent about the weapons triangle piece. I thought it was fine, but I didn’t much care either way. The first few characters were interesting enough as well. And I did feel sad when Alear’s mother died. But none of this was really enough to get me really engaged (pardon the pun). I didn’t know any of the other Emblem characters outside of the Three Houses one so I didn’t really care much either way. I much preferred Three Houses and their personal abilities instead of the whole rings thing in Engage. It felt overall gimmicky to me. Another thing that I couldn’t really get into with Engage was its music. It had really generic music that I can’t even remember to hum as the music was so unmemorable. Also, I had no interest in any of the characters that constantly just got added to the roster. There were no connections between the other characters. The support conversations were also very dull. I’m probably in the minority here, but I really liked the quests I got in Garreg Mach. I missed that aspect of the game in Engage. Overall, I was really invested in all the characters in Three Houses. I actually was really sad when my characters died in the game. In my first ever run through with no spoilers, I stumbled on the Crimson Flower route and I was just blown away when Edelgard turned out to be the Flame Emperor. I was that invested in the story. I also much preferred Three Houses’ serious tone. I liked that it took itself seriously and I think the music was very fitting for what it was. I’m glad that characters also ended up together, certain ones anyway. I always looked forward to the next support conversations as well as they were far better written than Engage’s. I also liked the flexibility in Three Houses on how you can build your characters and the abilities you can unlock by completing a class. Overall, Three Houses felt like a labor of love, and Engage felt like a bit of a money grab to take advantage of the Fire Emblem anniversary. I’ve only played Engage once and I played Three Houses like 8 or 9 times now.
For the story, engage has good story if you compare it to other fire emblem games and this is the first time ever in fire Emblem the main protagonist can talk. Fire emblem 3 houses is better at storyline when it offers 4 routes player can pick. If you pick crimson flower, the story still feels missing the last piece when Edelgard defeat Rhea and still need to face the ones who slither in the dark
FE:E Maddening mode is a joke compared to FE:3H Maddening. I had a FE:E Chapter 9 save of both Hard and Maddening. 31 enemies in both Hard and Maddening. Enemy Stats were the same in both Hard and Maddening. Ivy had 31 HP in Hard and 33 HP in Maddening. The Gimmick in FE:E, Maddening mode has no side battles to level up players, so by Chapter 9, you have a bunch of scrubs, and that’s what makes it more difficult. In hard mode you can level up players and Chapter 9 is easy. FE:3H Maddening, Enemies were 4 levels higher than Hard mode, and had more enemies on the map. Devs took a lazy approach to designing FE:E Maddening.
yeah, maddening in FEE is hard by limit the chance for player to farm lvl. in maddening mode in 3H. i can still farm lvl but it is less time, FEE in gameplay mechanic is better and more balance than 3H. in 3H, I can make everyone wyverns rider and if I see archers, i will dismount them, and the disadvantage is gone. but I can't do that in FEE. there are a lot to talk about game mechanic between 2 games, but story and replicability is the most we are talking about 2 games. 3H we can play new game and pick different route but in FEE, there is only one ending
@@abrahamlee1 don’t get me wrong, I like both 3H’s and Engage, but Archers/Snipers scared me in 3H’s Maddening, but not in Engage. Only exception, if I come across an Archer/Sniper with a brave bow.
@@madmarvcr yes I don’t say 3H or engage bad, they are both very good games and I enjoy all. I just say for the story, 3H has better story telling and Engage has better gameplay mechanics. One thing I mentioned engage did better is the main protagonist can speak and only in FEE i can hear Ike, byleth, Alear finally talk with voice, this is the new standard for the next fire emblem
So.... the inter-battle base looks better. The graphics are better, and they added PVP. Honestly, FE3H has some problems, sure, but despite that it's still the best game in the series by leaps and bounds. Byleth may not be the best avatar (it's still Robin. Ever since Awakening, it's been Robin and it's not close) but the sheer amount of content, control and options that 3H gives you completely dwarfs the rest of the series. It doesn't hurt that Fodlan is an excellent setting that just in the base game can go blow-for-blow with the other settings in the series with ease, many of which sport multiple games. Honestly when Engage was announced, I was disappointed... and I still am.
Yeah I agree FE 3 houses provides such a great story, and it is re-playable with NG+ feature. I wish Engage could done the same way, it is a big turn off for engage that doesn’t have NG+, Beside the good things Engage improve that I mention. I think story is more important than gameplay. Tearing saga is the first fire emblem i started and I played 4-5 times because i want to experience the story again
I've played all the american versions of Fire Emblem since Fire Emblem 7, this is the first one that I didn't like, I even liked fates but this one felt like such a drag, it was super easy even on maddening, the character design was awful, I hated Celina and Timerra. I liked the DLC maps and some of the paralogues. Fire Emblem is my favorite saga but if this is the way they're going forward I think I'm going to drop it. I don't mind the fan service but i think this was too much.
Yeah for the story line, i like the way fire emblem 7 telling story. In comparison to older fire emblem graphic, animation and combat are improved a lot. The design i agree that cheesy to compare to fire emblem 3 houses lol. Yeah good thing about Engage is crossing over. A lot of Emblems show up in this game. It is one way to make new players know more about old fire emblem through these Emblems. I like Fell Xenologue, a few story twists that I didn’t expect, i wish the design are more like three houses. The next fire emblem is likely a remake of fire emblem 4 with the new nintendo console is coming out .
How would you design the difficulty? A lot of the player base quotes maddening as "challenging, but not in a frustrating way." Usually difficulty is made by jacking up enemy stats to high levels so it takes 60 turns to clear a map. I find maddening to be almost that bad, but then I haven't employed vantage crits, warp skips, and bonded shields, most of those being strategies veterans would know to look for making for a much easier experience.
@@luisalbertogarciaibarra9852 in fire emblem engage maddening mode. It is way harder to grind than other fire emblem. I tried maddening classic without any death quite challenging haha
@@skypaladin9878 worst thing in fire emblem is warp and entrap staves lol it makes the map way easier but in maddening they did the best to limit all the grind we can make, tbh, maddening in fire emblem engage is harder than 3 houses
I'm not surprised that a lot of people are skipping on Engage. Like, who the fuck would want to play a new Fire Emblem after experiencing the absolute garbage that was 3H's monastery?
Yeah, i love replaying engage but three houses gets old REAAALLLY quick, i really dont understand how someone could copium himself so much to think three houses is better than engage
@@waddledottz Fire Emblem Engage is the first fire emblem that have Alear talk in the game, it never happen to any main protagonists before, in Engage, at least I can hear Byleth, Roy, Lyn,... talk lol. this will set a new standard for the next fire emblem. I heard the rumor about fire emblem 4 remake will be the next fire emblem
I didnt play 3H until 2 years after, i also didnt get to fully play conquest bc of university. I now understand what happened during my absence in the FE community. Overtime people saw fire emblem as the grittier darker themed nintendo game. Only for the cool kids who thrive off story and drama. With that, came in the three houses content creators. I honestly believe they are the reason the community is this divided. They werent speed runners or legit gods at strategic games, they just abused the story tropes because thats what got them the views. I guarantee no one is playing three houses for the gameplay. These new fire emblem fans are legit treating it like a sims game. Thats where i have an issue. They think their opinions are valid because FE america favors three houses. You telling me the developers didnt love engage, when they had sukuna on diamant and nanami on griss, or yamato from one piece is freaking CHLOE. After about 9 months, i started my 7th run on engage and its still fun
I enjoy the gameplay of Engage the most, it set a new standard for the next fire emblem. This is the first time ever the main protagonist can talk. All the mechanic from old fire emblems like weapon triangles is brought back. I played few Fire emblems and Engage is the best for game play. Fire emblem 3 houses has better story line and offer 4 routes that makes it have more replayability value
@@abrahamlee1 yea, I play mostly for speed runs and wacky builds, this is the most versatile game for characters, I'm making framme a wyvern knight and jean into halberdier. The engraves break the game and make any builds possible. I can't even imagine being a rom hacker. I'm telling you, play the game in Japanese and it's the best. No hate to the American cast, but I believe they sounded like babies on purpose, to throw off the game. Don't get me started on story and character development, I think engage has more in depth characters with actual trauma than 3 houses. I don't know what people are talking about. I started out with FE 6-8, bc my cousin hacked my psp lol. But I've played every fire emblem, including the rom hacks on my phone. Engage tops them all, simply because of the rings, characters, music. It doesn't need to be Gothic pianos to be epic, 3 houses was like a goths wet dreams.
![บุกร้านไอศกรีม VJ วุ้นเส้น !!!! [ดูคลิปเต็มหน้าช่อง] #Short | PANG ORNHIRA](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g549nEhKZdc/mqdefault.jpg)
Three Houses for the story, Engage for gameplay and map design. It's simple as that.
Haha I agree with that, and I also add Engage for the voice actors
I'm young. My first fire emblem experience was three houses, and while I knew that, it was making itself different with removing weapon triangle and the class system, but I absolutely loved it. Even now, with playing engage, I find a major difference in storytelling as well.
Ultimately, I prefer three houses, for both the storytelling, and for the class system, as well as it being my first experience with the series.
Fire emblem 3 houses can be replayed in many times for different routes, i like the ending of verdant dear the most. I find flying unit is OP in 3 houses. Rn i am replaying 3 houses and still enjoy it.most of the game I play because i like the story telling.
I love this game so much i watched youtube game okay of all the older ganes getting to see all of them again just made me appreciate then tbat much more and my favorite character woukd be chrom and corrin with out thinking twice i love this game its a masterpiece and just hearing there trial themes made me feel so nostalgic
Yeah this game is great, from Engage I know more about characters from other fire emblem like Marth, Soren, Ike. Haha Chrom and robin are funny, our bond are far stronger than destiny. Yeah after 2-3 years engage will still be a good game and it set the new standard in gameplay for future fire emblem
Agreed I also got more aprication for Sigurd and Leif I just don't think they get enough respect in my opinion
@@legobattles4734 yeah there is rumour that the next fire emblem will be fire emblem 4 remake. We will meet Sigurd soon lol
3 houses does have the weapon triangle but you have to work for it
Yeah it does more damage but not break foes like engage
I think that not having multiple endings is one of the big caveats that engage is missing
Three houses has more characters as well
But three houses is missing pvp which is a huge issue
If three houses had pvp added and engage had multiple endings, that would fix these games missing pieces.
I agree, but one thing I mentioned that Fire Emblem Engage set a new standard for the next fire emblem coming. the main protagonist can speak is a big deal. this is the first time ever I have seen in Fire Emblem series
@@abrahamlee1
Not really corrin and robin both spoke only really byeith was silent
I began to like Engage when I learned to mod it.
Oh do you mod on switch or on PC?
@@abrahamlee1 you can mod on PC or switch (its easier on PC). And if you read the tutorials you can create your own custom mods. I modified early units stats and statsgrowths so my Clanne could be as good as Ivy so I could get a little more diversity. Gamebanana is where you wanna go to get mods and learn how to mod FF Engage
@@e.angelg.caballero1798 yeah can you mod the growth rate ?
@@abrahamlee1 yep, you can change almost everything... but some stuff is more difficult than others, for example: Add a new weapon to a certain class: "Royal knight now can use swords C" is waaaay more difficult to mod than "Clanne 55% magic growth rate" or "change might (+3) to silver arts"
@@e.angelg.caballero1798 oh so we can mod almost everything in the game mechanics haha, even weapon proficiency
Lyn And Camilla were very Mid🫤. Camila was just a copy and pasted of Roy. And Lyn just felt like a waste
Sounds like you would prefer a "7 things I don't like about Engage" video, which I can certainly make. It's not a perfect game by any means but there's a lot I like about it. When you say Lyn is mid, do you mean from a gameplay perspective or story? because I got a ton of utility out of her.
@@abrahamlee1 both Story and Gameplay
@@crimsoneternalflower6880 dang, personally from a gameplay perspective I liked her, but she may not be for everyone. What emblems did you enjoy?
@@crimsoneternalflower6880game play? Lyn is considered an s tier emblem by many. Her pair up abilities are very strong, the duplicates are great on dodge tanks and creating walls, and the engage attack is very good at drawing bosses out towards at the start of the map.
@@crimsoneternalflower6880 all of my units are fighting to get Lyn. Anyone becomes a speed beast as soon as they’re paired up. Lyn, 3H, and Ike/Hector are easily the top 3 emblems. Which are your favorites and why? Now I’m curious… I think it’s very hard to mess up Lyn, how did you use her?
I love almost everything from engage but yeah coming back from 3H its quite a change, i get some people really didn't like the monastery but as it was my first time playing it i really enjoyed it, like going to talk with the students and they did say some stuff about whats going on in that month or how the story was, i played completly blind not knowing anything about the story and i really wanted to get the Edelgard route but as clueless i was i didn't get it lol, so i had to finish silver snow first then i looked how i was supposed to get it and i felt like a dumb dumb, but back to engage the story was boring... like really lame i get that you get new characters yeah its cool but FORCE you to use them in a new chapter and i believe we all can agree that the deployment cap is so short + you have to use the new fellas joining the team with no emblems or skills heck cant even earn some SP, and the veyle mind control is really fucked up at first i didn't like it but meh it felt like she was in her edgy phase lol, but yeah engage probably has so little replay potential like 3H which has new game + , and engage should've really got it but what would be the point other than maybe keep SP? skills? but in the end its like just breaking the game to the point that is not fun anymore, 3h you can transfer stuff but you dont get like giga broken to the point to trivialize the game (maybe lol i may be wrong tho) but yeah thats my personal opinion engage was fun but prob just a nostalgia trip to the old Lords and characters and someone didn't even make to be an actual Emblem lol (F for Alm, Eliwood, Shez, Elincia, and the Avatars Counter parts (Robin F , Byleth F, Corrin M ) maybe we get some emblems at some point but prob not and engage is done for til the next game or remake if its real lol i hope.
Yes 100% agree on the story telling, Three houses is way better than engage with multiple route you can pick. For the game play, it is not balance in 3 houses since bow is so OP to compare to other weapon types lol. you can just make everyone wyvern lord and using bow, if you see archer, just get off wyvern and you are safe, the Lvl cap in 3 houses is 99, but when you level character to around 50-60, he almost immortal at that point lol.
Yeah the NG+ is the feature that make Fire emblem replayable. Unfortunately, Engage doesn't have NG+, that is the bad thing, the game developer think they will make it to let player coop online or fight online but it end up sad because doesn't matter how strong the team is, other player will just use Hortensia with Micaiah and entrap one by one until no one left in the battle. the AI in PVP is super dumb lol.
I really enjoyed Fire Emblem Three houses for the depth in its contents. and Fire Emblem Engage for its gameplay haha. they are all good game and I definitely will play 3 houses again soon
I have only ever played two Fire Emblem games and the fact that Three Houses was my first really did impact how I viewed Engage. I’ll talk about what I really enjoyed about Engage before I get into why I much prefer Three Houses.
I was really impressed with Engage’s animation. The bright colors and the action really just “popped” on the screen. In the beginning, I did get really interested in the story. That scene where the protagonist runs through that hallway while all his allies were battling to create a path for him was just really a sight to behold.
I really loved how weapons didn’t break in this game. I was quite indifferent about the weapons triangle piece. I thought it was fine, but I didn’t much care either way. The first few characters were interesting enough as well. And I did feel sad when Alear’s mother died.
But none of this was really enough to get me really engaged (pardon the pun). I didn’t know any of the other Emblem characters outside of the Three Houses one so I didn’t really care much either way. I much preferred Three Houses and their personal abilities instead of the whole rings thing in Engage. It felt overall gimmicky to me.
Another thing that I couldn’t really get into with Engage was its music. It had really generic music that I can’t even remember to hum as the music was so unmemorable.
Also, I had no interest in any of the characters that constantly just got added to the roster. There were no connections between the other characters. The support conversations were also very dull.
I’m probably in the minority here, but I really liked the quests I got in Garreg Mach. I missed that aspect of the game in Engage.
Overall, I was really invested in all the characters in Three Houses. I actually was really sad when my characters died in the game. In my first ever run through with no spoilers, I stumbled on the Crimson Flower route and I was just blown away when Edelgard turned out to be the Flame Emperor. I was that invested in the story.
I also much preferred Three Houses’ serious tone. I liked that it took itself seriously and I think the music was very fitting for what it was. I’m glad that characters also ended up together, certain ones anyway. I always looked forward to the next support conversations as well as they were far better written than Engage’s.
I also liked the flexibility in Three Houses on how you can build your characters and the abilities you can unlock by completing a class.
Overall, Three Houses felt like a labor of love, and Engage felt like a bit of a money grab to take advantage of the Fire Emblem anniversary. I’ve only played Engage once and I played Three Houses like 8 or 9 times now.
For the story, engage has good story if you compare it to other fire emblem games and this is the first time ever in fire Emblem the main protagonist can talk.
Fire emblem 3 houses is better at storyline when it offers 4 routes player can pick. If you pick crimson flower, the story still feels missing the last piece when Edelgard defeat Rhea and still need to face the ones who slither in the dark
FE:E Maddening mode is a joke compared to FE:3H Maddening. I had a FE:E Chapter 9 save of both Hard and Maddening. 31 enemies in both Hard and Maddening. Enemy Stats were the same in both Hard and Maddening. Ivy had 31 HP in Hard and 33 HP in Maddening. The Gimmick in FE:E, Maddening mode has no side battles to level up players, so by Chapter 9, you have a bunch of scrubs, and that’s what makes it more difficult. In hard mode you can level up players and Chapter 9 is easy. FE:3H Maddening, Enemies were 4 levels higher than Hard mode, and had more enemies on the map.
Devs took a lazy approach to designing FE:E Maddening.
yeah, maddening in FEE is hard by limit the chance for player to farm lvl. in maddening mode in 3H. i can still farm lvl but it is less time, FEE in gameplay mechanic is better and more balance than 3H. in 3H, I can make everyone wyverns rider and if I see archers, i will dismount them, and the disadvantage is gone. but I can't do that in FEE. there are a lot to talk about game mechanic between 2 games, but story and replicability is the most we are talking about 2 games. 3H we can play new game and pick different route but in FEE, there is only one ending
@@abrahamlee1 don’t get me wrong, I like both 3H’s and Engage, but Archers/Snipers scared me in 3H’s Maddening, but not in Engage. Only exception, if I come across an Archer/Sniper with a brave bow.
@@madmarvcr yes I don’t say 3H or engage bad, they are both very good games and I enjoy all. I just say for the story, 3H has better story telling and Engage has better gameplay mechanics. One thing I mentioned engage did better is the main protagonist can speak and only in FEE i can hear Ike, byleth, Alear finally talk with voice, this is the new standard for the next fire emblem
So.... the inter-battle base looks better. The graphics are better, and they added PVP.
Honestly, FE3H has some problems, sure, but despite that it's still the best game in the series by leaps and bounds. Byleth may not be the best avatar (it's still Robin. Ever since Awakening, it's been Robin and it's not close) but the sheer amount of content, control and options that 3H gives you completely dwarfs the rest of the series. It doesn't hurt that Fodlan is an excellent setting that just in the base game can go blow-for-blow with the other settings in the series with ease, many of which sport multiple games.
Honestly when Engage was announced, I was disappointed... and I still am.
Yeah I agree FE 3 houses provides such a great story, and it is re-playable with NG+ feature. I wish Engage could done the same way, it is a big turn off for engage that doesn’t have NG+,
Beside the good things Engage improve that I mention. I think story is more important than gameplay. Tearing saga is the first fire emblem i started and I played 4-5 times because i want to experience the story again
I've played all the american versions of Fire Emblem since Fire Emblem 7, this is the first one that I didn't like, I even liked fates but this one felt like such a drag, it was super easy even on maddening, the character design was awful, I hated Celina and Timerra. I liked the DLC maps and some of the paralogues. Fire Emblem is my favorite saga but if this is the way they're going forward I think I'm going to drop it. I don't mind the fan service but i think this was too much.
Yeah for the story line, i like the way fire emblem 7 telling story. In comparison to older fire emblem graphic, animation and combat are improved a lot. The design i agree that cheesy to compare to fire emblem 3 houses lol. Yeah good thing about Engage is crossing over. A lot of Emblems show up in this game. It is one way to make new players know more about old fire emblem through these Emblems. I like Fell Xenologue, a few story twists that I didn’t expect, i wish the design are more like three houses.
The next fire emblem is likely a remake of fire emblem 4 with the new nintendo console is coming out .
How would you design the difficulty?
A lot of the player base quotes maddening as "challenging, but not in a frustrating way." Usually difficulty is made by jacking up enemy stats to high levels so it takes 60 turns to clear a map.
I find maddening to be almost that bad, but then I haven't employed vantage crits, warp skips, and bonded shields, most of those being strategies veterans would know to look for making for a much easier experience.
@@skypaladin9878 I would cap the grind, make it so you can't surpass enemy levels.
@@luisalbertogarciaibarra9852 in fire emblem engage maddening mode. It is way harder to grind than other fire emblem. I tried maddening classic without any death quite challenging haha
@@skypaladin9878 worst thing in fire emblem is warp and entrap staves lol it makes the map way easier but in maddening they did the best to limit all the grind we can make, tbh, maddening in fire emblem engage is harder than 3 houses
I'm not surprised that a lot of people are skipping on Engage. Like, who the fuck would want to play a new Fire Emblem after experiencing the absolute garbage that was 3H's monastery?
Haha yeah doing preparations is tedious. One thing fire emblem engage should do is exploration in other locations outside of somniel
Yeah, i love replaying engage but three houses gets old REAAALLLY quick, i really dont understand how someone could copium himself so much to think three houses is better than engage
@@waddledottz Fire Emblem Engage is the first fire emblem that have Alear talk in the game, it never happen to any main protagonists before, in Engage, at least I can hear Byleth, Roy, Lyn,... talk lol. this will set a new standard for the next fire emblem. I heard the rumor about fire emblem 4 remake will be the next fire emblem
@@waddledottz
I mean to you personally love mondstary it only got old after my second run but by then I already had more hours into then engage
I didnt play 3H until 2 years after, i also didnt get to fully play conquest bc of university. I now understand what happened during my absence in the FE community.
Overtime people saw fire emblem as the grittier darker themed nintendo game. Only for the cool kids who thrive off story and drama. With that, came in the three houses content creators. I honestly believe they are the reason the community is this divided.
They werent speed runners or legit gods at strategic games, they just abused the story tropes because thats what got them the views.
I guarantee no one is playing three houses for the gameplay. These new fire emblem fans are legit treating it like a sims game.
Thats where i have an issue. They think their opinions are valid because FE america favors three houses.
You telling me the developers didnt love engage, when they had sukuna on diamant and nanami on griss, or yamato from one piece is freaking CHLOE.
After about 9 months, i started my 7th run on engage and its still fun
I enjoy the gameplay of Engage the most, it set a new standard for the next fire emblem. This is the first time ever the main protagonist can talk. All the mechanic from old fire emblems like weapon triangles is brought back. I played few Fire emblems and Engage is the best for game play.
Fire emblem 3 houses has better story line and offer 4 routes that makes it have more replayability value
@@abrahamlee1 yea, I play mostly for speed runs and wacky builds, this is the most versatile game for characters, I'm making framme a wyvern knight and jean into halberdier. The engraves break the game and make any builds possible.
I can't even imagine being a rom hacker. I'm telling you, play the game in Japanese and it's the best. No hate to the American cast, but I believe they sounded like babies on purpose, to throw off the game.
Don't get me started on story and character development, I think engage has more in depth characters with actual trauma than 3 houses. I don't know what people are talking about.
I started out with FE 6-8, bc my cousin hacked my psp lol. But I've played every fire emblem, including the rom hacks on my phone. Engage tops them all, simply because of the rings, characters, music. It doesn't need to be Gothic pianos to be epic, 3 houses was like a goths wet dreams.