Gun Control Iceberg (Debunking Talking Points and Rhetoric)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 2.5K

  • @Loot_NukemXD
    @Loot_NukemXD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1384

    When i was about 8 y/o my uncle had someone break into his home and start beating his roommate to death with a lead pipe. Dude was a tweaker from the neighborhood and had completely lost his mind one night. My uncle, in crutches after a bad motorcycle accident, had to kill this guy with a shotgun while he could barely stand. There isnt a self defense option available that would have saved his life that night EXCEPT for a gun. Completely shaped my view on gun ownership regardless of my politics outside of guns.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Damn right, this completely outweighs the multiple daily mass shootings

    • @-Mintyy
      @-Mintyy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +283

      @@deezboyeed6764”multiple daily
      Mass shootings” lmao do you even care to sound informed? Also yea, the 500k-3M defensive uses of firearms every year do outweigh the mass shootings, tragic that happens but that doesn’t change the fact that our country was founded on inalienable rights and NOBODY gets to pick and choose which ones.

    • @MRmagnatron
      @MRmagnatron 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why did your uncle have someone break into his home?

    • @7.62-ATA
      @7.62-ATA 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MRmagnatronare you a foreigner? he said it was a tweaker so I'm assuming you're from somewhere that tweaker doesn't mean anything but they're pretty much drug addicts and I'm assuming he broke in to steal something to get his next fix or he was targeting his roommate

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @-Mintyy If you agree that your countries rights can not be changed, then repeal the thirteenth amendment or do you only partially believe that its inalienable?
      Also your defensive use of guns is a bullshit point because firstly its an estimation at best thats why the range is so stupidly huge and secoondly it doesnt count how many of those defensive uses are because the offensive party has guns. Weird that it works in every first world nation and not second ones like the us

  • @imperialbricks1977
    @imperialbricks1977 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +446

    Fun fact: The suppressor and the car muffler are the same patent, invented by Hiram Percy Maxim, the son of Sir Hiram Maxim, inventor of the machine gun.

    • @Man_Emperor_of_Mankind
      @Man_Emperor_of_Mankind 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Automotive mufflers were patented 15yrs before Percy Maxim's silencer patent

    • @imperialbricks1977
      @imperialbricks1977 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

      @
      The *modern* car muffler, not the one from 1897

    • @garrettgoss2691
      @garrettgoss2691 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      *The Maxim and Vickers. The Gatling gun is both a machine gun and not, depending on what definitions you use. The ATF for example, does NOT consider it a machine gun

    • @cheekibreeki921
      @cheekibreeki921 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The name "Silcener" itself is a misnomer, as it doesn't silence a firearm but suppresses both the Flash Signature and the Sound (slightly). Also helps dampen Recoil.

    • @FrobbleFr
      @FrobbleFr หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why do non gun owners care so much about gun laws. Like maybe just stop and think about how banning guns won’t get rid of them. Any criminal that wants a gun will just buy one illegally like cmon now

  • @Yummomummo
    @Yummomummo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1474

    "what do you mean the AR15 isnt an assault rifle? It's in the name Assault Rifle 15" - real thing said to me by an anti-gunner

    • @TheGhostFart
      @TheGhostFart 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      not just anti gunners think that but also normies

    • @Frank451Martin
      @Frank451Martin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

      Same crap my local fudds would say in my range even though it's literally named after the company and the guns they made say AR aren't ARs in their definition.

    • @-Mintyy
      @-Mintyy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      lol I’ve gotten this so often, kinda pisses me off the letters of the company align perfectly for dumb fucks to confuse them.

    • @DoMyHomework_
      @DoMyHomework_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably comes from Russia because the Russian supply depot officers are known to double as arms dealers to compensate for their meager wages. There's a reason why British gangs refer to guns as "Russians".

    • @lector-dogmatixsicarii1537
      @lector-dogmatixsicarii1537 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      So anyway:
      **posts 'My Little Armalite'**

  • @ga7027
    @ga7027 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +389

    As for the “if you want to own a weapon, join the military” they still don’t want veterans and service members to privately own firearms either

    • @Playing096
      @Playing096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      If I was American my wardrobe would store AR-15s, drawers would be for the pistols, shotguns under the bed and ammo everywhere

    • @dbio305
      @dbio305 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      @@Playing096How do I endorse your green card? lol.

    • @timothylynch6074
      @timothylynch6074 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Funnily enough while you're in you aren't allowed an assault toaster in your room.

    • @insanecheapo195
      @insanecheapo195 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@Playing096 marry me and come to the land of the free

    • @pepealasquid6005
      @pepealasquid6005 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Its so bad we have shootings on bases and only security can have guns. Shootings still happened.

  • @DoMyHomework_
    @DoMyHomework_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +605

    As an Australian, people who say that we've "solved" our gun crime issue clearly haven't heard of the many gangs we have here that have basically free access to any gun they want through the black market. Melbourne and Sydney are hotspots for shootings. Other than that, I'm pro 2A, full stop. My room would double as an armory if I could afford it.

    • @yoshisreal
      @yoshisreal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      You’re absolutely correct. Once you’ve allowed the general public to own and buy a gun, it’s just borderline impossible to undo that. Even if you did, it did practically nothing to stop gun crime. There’s no going back.
      Whether you’re pro-gun or anti-gun, people should be aware of that.
      Japan, for example, has banned the general public from buying or owning a gun (with eventually some exceptions) very long ago when Japan unified in 1600. Since then, Japan had very little gun crime.
      Basically if you want to ban guns, do it before it’s too late.

    • @Zamotak
      @Zamotak 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      ​@@yoshisreal while I can see where your coming from on that I will let you know it's rather simple to build home-made firearms and functioning ammunition. We did it as kids before the days of 3D printers. You would be surprised what you can put together from hardware and automotive stores as well as just trash in general.

    • @braydoxastora5584
      @braydoxastora5584 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lmao talking out your ass.. free access lol. Blackarket guns in oz are anything but free.
      And yet despite having gangs and crime like every other society Still no mass shootings.
      Its basical hiercharchy of controls. Elimination is highest on the pyramid for a reason

    • @hex6879
      @hex6879 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sounds like a job for the state.

    • @idonhaveanyideawhattocallm1472
      @idonhaveanyideawhattocallm1472 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @yoshisreal and even with all that their former PM still got shot

  • @judgemental9253
    @judgemental9253 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +134

    6:55 my favorite thing about British gun laws are that suppressors are encouraged, because they realize there’s literally no downside to making a explosion 15% quieter. And they don’t even need a stamp

    • @ForestWolf1757
      @ForestWolf1757 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Suppressors are literally the only thing regarding guns the Brits have done right

    • @dbio305
      @dbio305 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The ATF is a leech on the public… and other not so shocking facts!

    • @JacobWillits
      @JacobWillits หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah but they have low supressor restriction because it doesnt matter if its hard to buy a gun. In Usa its easy to buy a gun and no one wants to pay atf 200 for hearing protection devices funding them against us

  • @RaegenVA
    @RaegenVA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +639

    Who would ever need a fully automatic extended mag tactical assault revolver with a fore-grip and pack of gummy bears.

    • @anorouch
      @anorouch 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      Bethesda

    • @RaegenVA
      @RaegenVA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@anorouch Bugfester

    • @hodanisbased4980
      @hodanisbased4980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      I don't know about need, but I want one. I love gummy bears...

    • @TheGhostFart
      @TheGhostFart 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hodanisbased4980 sorry, all thats left are the sugar free haribo gummy bears

    • @_Nay_Nay
      @_Nay_Nay 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Don't knock the gummy bears. They are a life saver after a long ruck.

  • @pajamapantsjack5874
    @pajamapantsjack5874 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1380

    It’s crazy how a lot of anti gun boils down to “i want the government to have more power” people really think if they simp for the government they’ll be nice to them.

    • @lordtachanka903
      @lordtachanka903 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      WHY DO I SEE YOU LITERALLY EVERYWHERE!? This is like the 20th time I’ve seen you in the comments of something I’m watching in a 2 week period *ARE YOU IN MY WALLS* !?

    • @owenbrandon8370
      @owenbrandon8370 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Holy crap no matter what I click on you're there. It's good publicity for your channel I guess lol

    • @pajamapantsjack5874
      @pajamapantsjack5874 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      @@owenbrandon8370 hopefully it works the other way around too lol This guy is based af and makes really good stuff

    • @lordtachanka903
      @lordtachanka903 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@owenbrandon8370 you stole my comment

    • @AlphaGarg
      @AlphaGarg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's like the left learned nothing from the black panthers. If you can't physically defend yourself from the government, you WILL be trodden upon by it. Thankfully I've been seeing more and more pro-gun leftists, so not all is lost.
      Like, the big vs small government talk is nonsense when its generalising either wing (considering that for every anti-government right wing position (e.g. taxation) there's at least one pro-government right wing position, e.g. abortion, trans healthcare, migration, state laws vs fed law, military funding, etc), *but* when it comes to gun control (or freedom of speech in cases outside the US, e.g. Brazil), it's just true. Unless you FIRST demilitarise the police, UK style, removing guns from the people is just gonna create the perfect breeding grounds for actual fascism.

  • @truckerjesus8633
    @truckerjesus8633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +444

    23:00 you forgot one thing about that study: every single other factor they looked at increased chance of death more than owning firearms, including living in a poor area, living in a rich area, being black, being hispanic, and having a family.

    • @Noikl
      @Noikl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Ban economics, BAN PEOPLE. Hell yeah!!!!!

    • @queuedjar4578
      @queuedjar4578 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      Existing is fatal, shocking news to the world.

    • @Freedommanbutthesecond2
      @Freedommanbutthesecond2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Noikllet’s ban assault people!

    • @redridingcape
      @redridingcape 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@queuedjar4578 Turns out, we all die. Who would've thought?

    • @subjekt5577
      @subjekt5577 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It almost like poverty and mental health/social isolation is the issue

  • @barrybenson5671
    @barrybenson5671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +502

    A couple of years ago I went to Ireland for a week with a couple of classmates after I graduated high school. While I was there i had like 3 or 4 debates on guns. As much as I wanted to say I knew a lot about guns, I did not, I didn't even own one yet. When I got back from the trip I realized how ignorant I was about gun ownership, and bought one loved it, then I bought another and another and so on. Now I love my guns. So, thank you Ireland for informing me that I need another gun.

    • @lebronjames-eb4pe
      @lebronjames-eb4pe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      The one bad part about gun ownership is the addiction of buying more guns

    • @barrybenson5671
      @barrybenson5671 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@lebronjames-eb4pe Its not an addiction its a need.

    • @lebronjames-eb4pe
      @lebronjames-eb4pe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@barrybenson5671 its a need for most addiction for some.

    • @justsomeguy9700
      @justsomeguy9700 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@lebronjames-eb4pe its like trading stocks and bonds

    • @lebronjames-eb4pe
      @lebronjames-eb4pe 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@barrybenson5671 need for most addiction for some

  • @ЕгорАбрамов-ц4г
    @ЕгорАбрамов-ц4г หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    40:13 I am a Russian. Not many people know this, and not even all Russians know this, but we sold the Alaska territory to the US back in 1867. SOLD. Not rented, not surrendered, SOLD. Yes, that might have been foolish of us, but we did it, and there is no going back. I cringe every time I hear about this "reclamation of Alaska."

    • @drewjohnson7829
      @drewjohnson7829 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I love seeing people say we "took" Alaska when both governments have the paperwork saying the US bought it

    • @georgewhitworth9742
      @georgewhitworth9742 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      As an Alaskan: yeah it was a mutually agreed upon transaction.

    • @iand4374
      @iand4374 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Also if Russia did that it would probably start WW3. It's not gonna happen 😂😂

    • @itz_otto
      @itz_otto 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      i think a lot of americans know it was sold. our two countries have never fought a war with SOLDIERS

    • @CarlWhigga
      @CarlWhigga 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@itz_otto yup the most that's happened is shooting down each others drones and recon planes during the cold war lol

  • @Ispentwaytoomuchtimeonwt
    @Ispentwaytoomuchtimeonwt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +268

    I live in New Zealand where we have an excessively restrictive set of rules about guns, especially considering that gangs such as the mongrel mob (the largest gang in New Zealand) carry guns and usually have a fuck ton of them in gang dens. You literally have to have a special endorsement on your licence to own a pistol in New Zealand, and oh right, you can't even bring it out of your house. Crazy right? I know as I had to go through this shit getting a pistol, which I not only have to keep inside of my house, I have to store it in a gun safe at all times when I am not using it in the very rare case of self defence (other than competition shooting or going out to my mate in the country's farm to do some practise out there). Honestly I think it's a travesty that your government is trying to restrict weapons so severely in you country as it seriously conflicts with the second amendment. I also which to move to America for several reasons, but also because of the fact that shit is so restrictive here. I hope to god that none of these insane laws get passed, as it's the people who use weapons illegally that cause problems all most entirely, and it's not like changing laws will change that as you have said several times, criminals don't care about the law. I sincerely hope that America stays as free as it is for years to come.

    • @ianaumy
      @ianaumy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Come on over, you’d be welcomed with open arms

    • @justsomeguy9700
      @justsomeguy9700 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      We'd be happy to have ya here

    • @watch.v-dQw4w9WgXcQ
      @watch.v-dQw4w9WgXcQ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's ironic - people want to move to the US for more "freedom" yet the people in the US want to restrict it more and be more like other countries.

    • @firefly9838
      @firefly9838 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Dude, come over here. We will welcome you with open arms. We need people who understand gun control doesn't work.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your an american larping as a new zelander.

  • @hodanisbased4980
    @hodanisbased4980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +938

    "I'm pro 2A, but..."
    "I'm not racist, but..."
    "I don't think we should sacrifice our children to Moloch, but..."

    • @Gigakoopz
      @Gigakoopz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      Except that's where the similarities end. The analogy falls flat the moment you use your brain.

    • @hodanisbased4980
      @hodanisbased4980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

      @MethOverdose2001 What? I'm making fun of the "I'm 2A, but..." crowd. The same people he makes fun of in the vid

    • @cornfieldcombat
      @cornfieldcombat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I love this comment

    • @Admiral_Bongo
      @Admiral_Bongo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah, Moloch can have some if he gives me a nice 2 bedroom apartment.

    • @numbermannate
      @numbermannate 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never trust what a man says after a but

  • @JackAkaJCK
    @JackAkaJCK 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    Women always had more rights than guns since guns dont have and can never have rights.
    Gun rights means that the People have a right to own guns.

    • @TheUberninjaChannel
      @TheUberninjaChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      The people that preach this don’t realize how heavily women benefit from gun ownership. It’s truly the great equalizer.

    • @iand4374
      @iand4374 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Theres a book called "That Non-violence Stuff'll Get You Killed" which covers how the 2nd amendment helped the Civil Rights movement

  • @pootis.145
    @pootis.145 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1472

    I paused my thug shaker to be here

    • @someengineermain6803
      @someengineermain6803 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

      I paused my rule 34 to be here

    • @RaegenVA
      @RaegenVA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

      I paused my TF2 Tick Tock by joji to be here

    • @baconflakes3345
      @baconflakes3345 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      I paused my Whygena Draws to be here

    • @mot3600official
      @mot3600official 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I paused my sissy hypno porn to be here

    • @FrankBlaskovich
      @FrankBlaskovich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@baconflakes3345 gtfo we were having a peaceful gooning discussion without full on degenerates

  • @malezra843
    @malezra843 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    My uncle was killed by a grizzly bear after applying a full can of bear spray to its face. I bet he wished he had one of his guns at that moment. He was a hunting guide.

    • @mutilatedpopsicles
      @mutilatedpopsicles 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Bearspray is funny, I don't see how a little can of pressurized capsaicin would do shit for an animal basically designed to kill.

    • @Gigakoopz
      @Gigakoopz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's possible that the wind effected the spray. When outdoors the wind becomes a little bit of an unpredictable factor.

    • @---pt8fk
      @---pt8fk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mutilatedpopsicles It's not difficult to understand

    • @MatthewJeffero
      @MatthewJeffero หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why lie? Your uncle is alive...why would you pretend that he is dead....very sick

    • @Zentailium
      @Zentailium หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Gigakoopz Wanna know what doesnt bend to such trivial laws of physics? A chunk of lead flying at 2600 feet per second!

  • @ELMedain
    @ELMedain 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +365

    “But the government will just bomb you” …. Brother…. You live next door.

    • @slydoorkeeper4783
      @slydoorkeeper4783 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      Not to mention, I'm pretty sure they don't want to rule over ruins. And it will show greater weakness to the rest of the world because they will then have nothing to offer nor taxes to extract.

    • @joshuabacker2363
      @joshuabacker2363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@slydoorkeeper4783 Waco says otherwise.

    • @slydoorkeeper4783
      @slydoorkeeper4783 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@joshuabacker2363 That was them on only one family who they can lie and say was an extremist. To them a small loss. Imagine even a quarter of the country though.

    • @joshuabacker2363
      @joshuabacker2363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@slydoorkeeper4783 The reality though is that they would never need to go after 1/4th of the country, not even close. They can go after 1/10,000 and it would keep the rest in line.

    • @slydoorkeeper4783
      @slydoorkeeper4783 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @joshuabacker2363 I hate how that might be true even though it really shouldn't.

  • @Bunjee98
    @Bunjee98 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +203

    Believe it or not, about 2 years ago here in Australia there was a petition going around that was gauging how Australians would feel if we had more American style gun laws, the petition floated around for about a month and just disappeared with next to no trace at all, Why did it disappear? Because the overwhelming majority of Australians where in favour of it, Even I signed it, That’s how badly our tyrannical government wants to keep us disarmed, So even if 100% of Australians wanted to have our guns back it still wouldn’t happen because our government won’t even let us vote on it

    • @TheUberninjaChannel
      @TheUberninjaChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      The majority of Aussies didn’t want to give up their guns in the first place but the person in power at the time threatened them with prison…

    • @Bunjee98
      @Bunjee98 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheUberninjaChannel Yeah John Howard, Or as we call him Howard the coward, Absolute fascist he was, Our current pm is also a massive tyrant

    • @rollerskdude
      @rollerskdude 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The majority of gun owners didn't give up their guns.

    • @killingtimeitself
      @killingtimeitself หลายเดือนก่อน

      do you have any data or evidence to back that claim up? or are we just making anecdotal claims here?

    • @garrettgoss2691
      @garrettgoss2691 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@rollerskdudeso those pictures of hundreds and thousands of weapons that were broken down with saws that I've seen from Australia are faked?

  • @FounderPaine
    @FounderPaine 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    Personally, I am a huge advocate of women having the same rights as guns! Common sense woman control!

    • @Meta9871
      @Meta9871 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Brother spittin the facts. Mandatory background checks for all women 🔥

    • @michaelguernsey1206
      @michaelguernsey1206 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Meta9871lmfao

    • @michaelguernsey1206
      @michaelguernsey1206 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This killed me

    • @insanecheapo195
      @insanecheapo195 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Forget repeal the 19th, lets do this one instead

    • @MatthewJeffero
      @MatthewJeffero หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your statement makes no sense, you sound like a lonely incel

  • @mrbenjiboy9527
    @mrbenjiboy9527 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +355

    We have extremely strict gunlaws in Sweden. Yet criminals seems to have gotten a hold of ak47s and submachine guns.

    • @DavidDavid-cj6xp
      @DavidDavid-cj6xp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

      Don’t forget about the hand grenade attacks.

    • @Pickle7.62
      @Pickle7.62 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

      My heart goes out to the people of Sweden having to deal with mass immigration and tyranny, praying for you and your family ❤

    • @JacobsTrash
      @JacobsTrash 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Sweden should try being more like Poland.

    • @Gigakoopz
      @Gigakoopz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      This is because of sweden's poor borders. They just let anyone in, which makes smuggling in weapons very easy. That's precisely the reason.

    • @tugalord
      @tugalord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Same here in France, we have even more strict gun laws, yet in the city I study at shootings have become an everyday thing.

  • @noblecommando4269
    @noblecommando4269 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I would love to imagine living in a world where people argue that mufflers should be illegal so you can hear cars coming.
    Also this channel is criminally underrated!

    • @misanthropicservitorofmars2116
      @misanthropicservitorofmars2116 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s even more crazy cause we live in a world where they are pushing EV cars on you. Which makes much less noise than gasoline engines.

  • @Mentallysubnormal
    @Mentallysubnormal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    The biggest one to me is the "prohibited posessor" class of people. You got caught with 2gs and a scale when you were 18? Oh well now you cant defend your family when you're 30!

    • @AJadedLizard
      @AJadedLizard 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      If you're safe enough to be out in circulation, why can't you have a gun?
      You're not safe to own a gun? Why are you out in circulation?

    • @obliviousicarus
      @obliviousicarus 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      “Shall not be infringed” applies to even those who violate what a piece of paper says in Washington.

    • @Mentallysubnormal
      @Mentallysubnormal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@AJadedLizard Exactly, if you do the time and you don’t reoffend your family shouldn’t be put in harms way.

    • @zacharykelly7434
      @zacharykelly7434 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In most states black powder weapons aren't considered to be firearms (as is the federal view) so felons can in fact have them

    • @cohengamertv6548
      @cohengamertv6548 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dont do a crime, are you actually dumb?

  • @Slamboni4k
    @Slamboni4k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    If you or a loved one believes that the US congress would handle disarmament responsibly, despite the track record of reckless death, destruction, and lack of transparency, consider the following: Weep, and pray, for they are lost.

  • @vladimirbogdanov7472
    @vladimirbogdanov7472 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +228

    At about 0:26 I just damm noticed that the character in the gameplay is reloading his lever action like a shotgun, like cmon the side loading gate is RIGHT THERE!

    • @dantepizza6310
      @dantepizza6310 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Willing to bet they didnt have enough budget for an animated loading gate. And to be fair, a lever action could work like that, still cursed as hell though.

    • @burtbiggum499
      @burtbiggum499 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Most game devs never have real guns and that game was developed before you could just youtube how literally every gun works. The first couple modern warfare games used airsoft guns for their models for instance

    • @vladimirbogdanov7472
      @vladimirbogdanov7472 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I can see how the mistake could have happened, but still a funny little mistake :D

    • @Krag-Jorgensen30-40
      @Krag-Jorgensen30-40 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It is pretty weird, but the game is amazing. It’s called Call of Juarez: Gunslinger. You gotta try it out

    • @kaamo8966
      @kaamo8966 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      This game actually has a loading gate reload animation, but it switches to the 0:26 variant (don't know how it's called, eng is not my native language) if you take a quick reload perk. It's a rather theatrical move, but techland had included it intentionally. It also changes other guns' reloads, only sometimes you physically cannot come up with a realistic way to do so

  • @BioHunter1990
    @BioHunter1990 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +375

    Just starting...why do I feel like the deeper we go, the dumber the arguments are going to be?

    • @carinae005
      @carinae005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because gun grabbers are only more delusional with each passing day, their ideology is noxious.

    • @Lat-YuFrantu516
      @Lat-YuFrantu516 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      That's gun control in a nutshell

    • @mattb4010
      @mattb4010 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      because they just turn into more extreme versions of "well if you bend over for the government they might give you lube"

    • @woodlefoof2
      @woodlefoof2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@BioHunter1990 some of the arguments actually get more intelligent. Not necessarily more convincing, but more well researched.
      Then they fall back down to even lower depths than the first arguments.
      (What you gonna do against a nuke hmmmm?)

    • @michaelguernsey1206
      @michaelguernsey1206 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’d say that they do get more thought out as they go along, but they are still arguing something that is just against common sense so it doesn’t work.

  • @Flashbingus
    @Flashbingus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    7:30 first off its a grower not a shower, second why are you thinking about it?

    • @dantepizza6310
      @dantepizza6310 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like same, i got someone already. Why the hell are you staring at my dick?

    • @AstroPkReal
      @AstroPkReal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I’m not thinking about it I swear >w

  • @o11borntoawoo34
    @o11borntoawoo34 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    One of the biggest issues with red flag laws is how easy it is to deny 'due process'. My buddy threatened his ex when she attempted to kidnap his child. 4 years later and he is mentally sound enough serve in the military, but the government isn't convinced he not a harm to himself or others.

    • @JacobWillits
      @JacobWillits หลายเดือนก่อน

      The military wants him because of that exact reason if hes believed to bd a threat thats who you train into a ruthless killer

    • @o11borntoawoo34
      @o11borntoawoo34 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ he’s an MP. There isn’t anything ruthless about him.

  • @AusFirewing
    @AusFirewing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    "Australia did a ban and it worked."
    I am so sick of hearing this.
    Firstly, violent crime spiked in the year after the gun ban, kidnappings most of all, and didn't decline to the pre-ban levels until the late 2000s.
    Secondly, it didn't stop mass killings. Psychopaths simply switched to arson, burning down buildings with dozens of people inside.
    Thirdly, it didn't stop criminals from getting guns. Just take a look at any Australian state police X account and you'll see them praising themselves for seizing guns that, even though we live on an island, still made it into the country.
    Finally, the buyback didn't even work. Less than a third of all registered guns were recovered in the confiscation.

  • @chiefbanana1093
    @chiefbanana1093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    Massachusetts passed the most restrictvie gun control bill that banned most semi auto firearms overnight. Even the most loved 10/22 is in limbo due to the wording of the bill

    • @AFT_05G
      @AFT_05G 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      MA is a straight up NPC state now, bunch of midwits thinking their state is superior to rest of the country because they got the muh "education" and "healthcare".

    • @ld2048
      @ld2048 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      mass noncompliance

  • @Channel-23s
    @Channel-23s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    16:42 “ya give them a inch and they’ll take a mile” fits perfectly as they want all of them gone but lie about there intentions

    • @CarbonatedGravy
      @CarbonatedGravy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Always, every time. They call slow erosion “compromising” because it’s slow instead of fast, they will always want more next year. It isn’t a compromise if you hand something over and get nothing in return, you want universal background checks and licensing then give us our semi-autos and high capacity mags back

  • @faithknight400
    @faithknight400 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    as a canadian i wish we had more freer gun purchasing options, but the laws, man, my texas friend thought it was nuts with how gun owners of restricted firearms need permission from the police to bring a hand gun to the range

    • @lisaanimi
      @lisaanimi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And there is way less issues in Canada. One could say restrictions are a good thing

    • @mtf-alpha-1
      @mtf-alpha-1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      @@lisaanimiactually no it’s not, I mean can you guarantee that the government won’t turn tyrannical in Canda? Oh wait they kind of already have but hey I’m sure you totally trust the government right? Because they could never do anything wrong at all! Totally not! (That was sarcasm but you probably didn’t get it)

    • @SlingAndStones
      @SlingAndStones 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Bro has 0 likes 😭
      ​@@lisaanimi

    • @yungsinna3678
      @yungsinna3678 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You also aren’t allowed to shoot restricted guns (handguns) on private property but you can shoot magnum cartridges no problem

    • @SlingAndStones
      @SlingAndStones 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yungsinna3678 what a damn tragedy

  • @SplashingMANGO
    @SplashingMANGO 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    So I’m a Canadian and I’ll say this for anyone that still hasn’t gotten the point:
    Gun control doesn’t work!
    Here in Canada we have the single most anti-gun gov’t in the history of our nation and we are also facing the worst violent crime rates we’ve ever had, 30% worse than 10 years ago. If gun control works, then explain the horrible uptick in violence up here.
    But even if that wasn’t the case, I’d still be against gun control. For the basic fact that it’s a gross misuse of our respective justice systems.
    We live in free nations, governed by the rule of law. It is not morally righteous to limit an individual’s access to their privately owned, lawfully obtained property without individual due process. By definition, gun control is punishing law abiding citizens without evidence of wrongdoing, or ill intent, and it spits in the face of the entire point of western justice: innocent until proven guilt.
    Oh and fuck “compromise.”
    By virtue of where I was born I had to go through a rigorous safety course, passing with no less than an 80% on a written test and practical demonstration, then I had to pay with a submission for a firearm license, then I had to wait 6 months for that license to arrive. Then I could go and buy an AR-15, which I have to wait no less than 3 days after paying for it before I could take it home, have strict storage regulations I have to follow, I can’t shoot it anywhere besides a gov’t approved gun range and I can go to prison for 10 years if I didn’t follow those laws to the letter. But I do all of that in the name of “compromise.” But what happens? One asshole on the other end of the country, who acquired all of his firearms illegally, went on a shooting spree, causing the most deadly mass you know what in CDN history, and now because of that POS now I can’t be trusted to own an AR?
    No, that’s beyond compromise, that’s beyond injustice, that’s beyond unethical! It’s tyrannical overreach, plain and simple!

    • @Playing096
      @Playing096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Want a better example? Here in Brazil we have one of the MOST STRICT GUN LAWS IN THE WORLD and we have more firearms death per MONTH than the US per YEAR

    • @AdamantLightLP
      @AdamantLightLP หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's happened to Canada is a tragedy. Trudeau has killed your nation.

    • @vukberbakov344
      @vukberbakov344 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Serbia.Litteraly impossible to get a licence unless you have connections

  • @TCTheDS
    @TCTheDS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +141

    All the people pushing for stricter gun laws reminds me of what Zola said in Captain America the winter soldier, "Hydra created a world so chaotic, that humanity is finally ready to sacrifice its freedom, to gain its security"

    • @VikingRWR
      @VikingRWR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      That's some Marvel propaganda to try to convince playdough brain fans to give up freedom in the name of "security" but it's false security.

    • @yaboileeroy3038
      @yaboileeroy3038 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I remember having a full-on debate with my friend after watching it, me being on Cap’s side while my friend took Iron Man’s side of the argument. Every single argument he made came down to emotional pleas and a need for security while I acknowledged that with freedom comes the responsibility of handling yourself and others regardless, especially if you used your freedom to protect the freedom and liberty of others. We agreed ti disagree, but a lot of what I heard there was eerily familiar to the anti-gun talking points we usually hear.

    • @firefly9838
      @firefly9838 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Every time I watch that movie I think of this issue... you are spot on:)

    • @thelastminuteman7513
      @thelastminuteman7513 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Deep stuff like that was why Winter Soldier was the best MCU movie. It was borderline Metal Gear Solid 3.

    • @billybob-zk9nm
      @billybob-zk9nm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thelastminuteman7513lmaoo fr. I firmly know now as an adult that me playing MGS trilogy as a child when I was little(only had a ps2 till 6th grade, when parents got me ps4) formed my opinions now. I barely understood the metaphorical meanings and politics of the game so me and one of my best friends would sink hours into breakdowns videos and gameplay/cutscene footage of 4. It couldn’t be a coincidence how eerily similar we r today(besides the weed haha)

  • @dantepizza6310
    @dantepizza6310 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Just realized we gotta bring back gun PSAs, gotta get Eddie Eagle back (voiced by liquid snake)

  • @bowlofsoup7721
    @bowlofsoup7721 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +107

    I for one would be interested in a video covering the evils of the UN

    • @James_Bee
      @James_Bee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      A single video? It would be hours long... DAYS.
      The U.N. is evil.

    • @blazergamer6425
      @blazergamer6425 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are evil and completely incompetent, there has never been a single United Nations peacekeeping mission that actually worked.

    • @soldier22881
      @soldier22881 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they have been known to keep the balkans unstable and are involved in multiple human trafficking rings

    • @justindavis25
      @justindavis25 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They took some pictures during the rwanda genocide. What more do you want them to do?

    • @soldier22881
      @soldier22881 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      my comment got deleted. truth is not allowed on youtube

  • @SouthernUnionist
    @SouthernUnionist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

    How to debunk one of the main points.
    "Why do you need an AR-15?"
    "Because I want it."

    • @diamondhamster4320
      @diamondhamster4320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      To do what?

    • @SouthernUnionist
      @SouthernUnionist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      @@diamondhamster4320 because I want it, i have the money, and the qualifications. I don't have to explain myself to you.

    • @diamondhamster4320
      @diamondhamster4320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@SouthernUnionist Point still stand, why do you want it? What do you need it for?

    • @SouthernUnionist
      @SouthernUnionist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      @diamondhamster4320 my point still stands as well. We live in a country where a law-abiding citizen is guaranteed the right to own a firearm of their choosing. This also means they can purchase a firearm of any type for any reason within the law. This can range from self-defense to simple target shooting. The justification of "because I think it's cool and I want one" is completely sufficient.

    • @diamondhamster4320
      @diamondhamster4320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@SouthernUnionist Awesome, you have started with that - that you want a firearm "because they are cool and I want one". See? Was it not simple?

  • @zachcurrie4258
    @zachcurrie4258 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    blasting a shotgun OUT of the house is so insanely illegal lmao

    • @gavynhohon2818
      @gavynhohon2818 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Depends if it’s on your property or whether or not you’re in city limits.

    • @Zentailium
      @Zentailium หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the city definetly but in the country fire away

  • @clandorangaming
    @clandorangaming 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    "But guns are dangerous!"
    Me: "Cars kill 3 times more people per year than guns do, you wanna take cars away next?"

    • @matthiuskoenig3378
      @matthiuskoenig3378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean they do, Democrats are becoming increasely anti-car

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well unlike guns cars can actually be regulated legally.

    • @subjekt5577
      @subjekt5577 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Honestly I'd love if we started regulating cars more. Too many murder trucks on the streets these days.
      It's also a fun argument with taxes. I don't get how people can be okay with investing trillions into highway infra over the years but somehow federal healthcare is communism?

    • @TheUberninjaChannel
      @TheUberninjaChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@subjekt5577 because people easily abuse free healthcare and the working person foots the bill typically. Same with food stamps. I believe we should have safety nets but there needs to be a path out of those nets if you’re not disabled somehow.
      Unfortunately the typical free healthcare visit will just be someone trying to get pain killers for their addiction or some hypochondriac wasting time and resources because they stubbed their toe.

    • @thegeneral1955
      @thegeneral1955 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@subjekt5577Have you seen the state of most roads in this country? Enough said.

  • @MajorZero61
    @MajorZero61 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    5:10 How on earth did you forget to mention that .223/5.56 is _banned_ for hunting deer because it's too underpowered, meaning you'd need to have an AR chambered in a larger cartridge than what it's most commonly chambered in?

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Because it depends on state itself.

    • @zacharykelly7434
      @zacharykelly7434 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's banned in states where non hunters make hunting laws. Ffs the largest bear ever killed was taken down with a .22

    • @kiing_ducky
      @kiing_ducky หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In Texas I can use a 5.56 as long as it’s not full auto or rimfire( which is 22)

  • @DaAverageHistorian
    @DaAverageHistorian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

    Finally. I can use this for my mom. I believe in guns but she doesn’t

    • @José-Cuba-s2s
      @José-Cuba-s2s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      You believe in guns? Never heard of that religion

    • @DaAverageHistorian
      @DaAverageHistorian 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      @@José-Cuba-s2s It’s a wacky one

    • @manitoba-op4jx
      @manitoba-op4jx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@José-Cuba-s2s wait until you meet the machine spirit

    • @José-Cuba-s2s
      @José-Cuba-s2s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@manitoba-op4jx the holy ghost shotgun

    • @SoMuchFacepalm
      @SoMuchFacepalm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@manitoba-op4jx Da holy toob. Big Dakka, simple as.

  • @tugalord
    @tugalord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    As a pro gun frenchman, this video was pretty good.
    If you want more in depth philosophical arguments for gun rights id recommend Mentiswave's video on it.

    • @PunishedBeerCanBennyIV
      @PunishedBeerCanBennyIV 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      based mentiswave enjoyer

    • @TheCelticCowboy98
      @TheCelticCowboy98 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      A based Frenchman who also enjoys Mentiswave's. Good to meet you, Be safe out there brother.

  • @Halo56782
    @Halo56782 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +84

    Seeing that lever action load from under the receiver while the side gate is RIGHT THERE causes me pain

    • @SoMuchFacepalm
      @SoMuchFacepalm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I'm guessing you haven't played anything by Bethesda?

    • @Halo56782
      @Halo56782 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SoMuchFacepalm oh no, I have

    • @SoMuchFacepalm
      @SoMuchFacepalm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Halo56782 What's your most hated Bethesda-ism? Mines the 'assult rife' in F4.

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SoMuchFacepalmNot Bethesda but Mafia Definitive Edition has so many anachronistic firearms compared to the original game where the guns were more period accurate. For example the “Service Revolver” in the original game was a Colt Python and the “Magnum Revolver” was a Smith & Wesson Model 19 in the 1930s. In the original game, the developers used the period accurate Smith & Wesson Model 10 and Model 27 respectively for those weapons. Or the shotgun which went from a period accurate Winchester M1897 to an anachronistic Remington 870. All because they recycled weapons from Mafia III including the period accurate weapons.

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SoMuchFacepalmReally a fictional weapon fitting the scavenger aesthetic of the franchise sets you off? You shouldn’t go to Fallout 3 then. There the Assault Rifle is a G3 Battle Rifle.

  • @istimagyar53
    @istimagyar53 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Poverty, crime, lack of mental healthcare is the real killer.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So banning fire arms would help?

    • @joshuabacker2363
      @joshuabacker2363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't think poverty's killing anybody in America.

    • @donecoin33
      @donecoin33 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@joshuabacker2363poverty breeds the grounds for violent crimes. Poverty also breeds gang culture because this culture is all these people have. People join gangs to gain money, fame/infamy, brotherhood, and purpose. There are things impoverished people usually lack, whether it just be one or all of the reasons mentioned

    • @joshuabacker2363
      @joshuabacker2363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@donecoin33 You say this but again, statistics say otherwise. The correlation is weak in fact and logically as well; You do not wake up one day and decide "I should murder someone because my bank account is empty."
      Lacking fame, brotherhood, and purpose describes 99% of people in America, so that doesn't fit either.

    • @Sleepyguy4125
      @Sleepyguy4125 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@joshuabacker2363if you don’t think that then you are way too privileged

  • @Vladyslav_Zubakha
    @Vladyslav_Zubakha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I'm from Ukraine and I have a good arguement against the "there are gun free countries and they are safe" claim. So Ukraine was kind of safe, we had more corrupt politicians than murderers until 24th of February 2022, our government literally had to give AK's to citizens in early February because there was none.

    • @Vladyslav_Zubakha
      @Vladyslav_Zubakha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @slon-s8f хрюкай-хрюкай, catsap

    • @januszpolak254
      @januszpolak254 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Ukraine was kinda safe"
      Bro you literally had Russia wanting to fuck you over for 12 years before full on war.

    • @garymandering
      @garymandering หลายเดือนก่อน

      @slon-s8f Россия почувствует мощь Запада

    • @theKashConnoisseur
      @theKashConnoisseur หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well, the historical basis for American gun ownership goes back to that time when a bunch of American farmers with privately owned firearms managed to beat back the world's most powerful military at the time. So we fully understand and support Ukraine's current position.

  • @pajamapantsjack5874
    @pajamapantsjack5874 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    Your use of Bible verses was very well done, you didn’t use them as a way to attack the people you are giving criticisms , instead as a way to boost the positive messages you were trying to get across. Immediate sub.

    • @IceMMAnnn
      @IceMMAnnn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Who tf cares about the Bible also I love your art bro big fan

    • @dogeboithedoomslayer
      @dogeboithedoomslayer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@IceMMAnnnbible is based

    • @jan_kest
      @jan_kest หลายเดือนก่อน

      @IceMMAnnn at least 2,4 bn people worldwide

    • @IceMMAnnn
      @IceMMAnnn หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ How many of them actual read it

  • @FeatheredDino
    @FeatheredDino 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The AR-15 actually shoots a bullet so small, it's below the minimim size required to hunt big game with in most US states.

    • @theKashConnoisseur
      @theKashConnoisseur หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Anything bigger than a coyote is getting a bigger round than 5.56.

    • @JacobWillits
      @JacobWillits หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean you could hunt grizzly with a 5.56 but yeah bro i agree youre going to want bigher bullet and also more than one guy with a gun if you ask me i saw a video of a grizzly like rogan talking anout them things are gargantuan and theyre walking around our continent bro luckily they hibernate.

  • @Enbreadening
    @Enbreadening 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    This video has convinced me that gun control is a bad idea, and as someone who lives in the UK, I'm sad I can't own a gun easily.

    • @scrittle
      @scrittle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I'm actually proud my country banned handguns. Pointing and firing a gun is significantly easier than doing gym and learning to stab with a knife or do martial arts. Gun violence is not a statistic I want to come back, I don't want my life to end in seconds because I was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
      Look. There's no such thing as mass stabbings, but mass shootings do exist. For the safety of the streets and the country, keep the guns banned.

    • @Underqualified_Gunman
      @Underqualified_Gunman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@scrittle congratulations, you've now made children, women, the crippled, and the elderly vulnerable to the average slightly fit man with malicious intentions. be it rape, robbery, or murder, or something else those groups now can't defend themselves. might explain a bit of why england and sweden have such a problem with rape.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Underqualified_GunmanCool fanfiction, now lets look at crime rates for first world countries....

    • @jewmanchoolee466
      @jewmanchoolee466 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Handguns require pratice just like martial arts, unless youre shooting at a large target thats within 20 feet of you, your not going to be a good shot, the size of the handgun matters aswell, an untrained person with a subcompact 9mm wont be able to hit the broadside of barn. A rifle or shotgun is much easier to put rounds on target with less training. Glad your happy with your countries laws, but most americans like myself are seeing our government strip away rights and we are not going to give up anymore, atleast i hope lol

    • @scrittle
      @scrittle 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What rights are being stripped away? The amendment protects your right to bear arms, so restricting choice of arms is the most Congress is going to allow. You can still end lives with the pull of a trigger and that's the American way.
      Another thing about martial arts is they're defensive techniques. Most of them are pretty bad at subduing fleeing opponents until you get them in a grapple or on the edge of a pike. But guns are all marksmanship, size and strength no longer matter until your gun surpasses a certain kickback + weight bracket. It's an offensive technique designed to kill, and that's what annoys me with this video. Guns are designed to kill unlike kitchen knives or fire axes, and that's why I'm perfectly content with my country keeping them under lock and key.
      If America wants their guns they can keep them, don't drag my country's name through the mud like we're an outlier though. This video is right to identify that violent individuals will resort to any means to cause harm, which is why handguns are banned - to significantly reduce potential harm. Nobody's going to slaughter dozens of people with knives like they could with a gun. *To re-assure the Americans who think our policemen carry guns, they don't. Our policemen aren't allowed guns either, only a special tactical group are allowed guns.*

  • @brapgabslab7336
    @brapgabslab7336 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I challenge gun grabbers with the question "name a single totalitarian government that didn't disarm the populace, I'll wait" they never answer the question.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is fucking hilarious take when the US ranks below most european nations in both freedom and democracy

    • @JellyWhopper
      @JellyWhopper 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@deezboyeed6764 Where is your source for that? Lol you're coping hard

    • @TheUberninjaChannel
      @TheUberninjaChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@deezboyeed6764 yes, and you think banning guns will make the US more or less free?

    • @williamblazkowicz5587
      @williamblazkowicz5587 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@TheUberninjaChannelless

  • @raptorcell6633
    @raptorcell6633 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The only time ill listen to "I'm pro-2A but" is if it's immediately followed up "I'm not sure about private ownership of nukes."

    • @Ahsad-Afghan
      @Ahsad-Afghan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      BUT what? It’s still nuclear ARMS, RIGHT? What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED do you not understand? Do you not support the right of the people to vaporize several square miles of land in an instant? Has the 2A community really come to this? Alas, that these evil days would be mine, for lost is the way of the Sun Summoner Toob.
      Anyways, Brandon Herrera for Director of the ATF

    • @just_that_crazy5179
      @just_that_crazy5179 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey what about "Im not 2A but i think everyone should have a gun?" Does that feel more fedbait or free thinker?

    • @Ahsad-Afghan
      @Ahsad-Afghan หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@just_that_crazy5179 it feels like a lack of thought entirely

  • @jlsgarage872
    @jlsgarage872 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Toting the "high capacity assault weapon" line is like saying oh your mustang has 700hp youll never need that much horsepower for daily driving you shouldnt be allowed to own that

    • @ryanharrington5066
      @ryanharrington5066 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I kinda get it tho... You can't really kill a bunch of people with 3 bullets compared to a 30 mag that you can keep swapping out

    • @gifthorse3675
      @gifthorse3675 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ryanharrington5066- Magazines are a plastic rectangle with a spring and follower. You should look up homemade guns and magazines. Look at homebuilt guns in South America.

  • @jbk19xx57
    @jbk19xx57 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Them: “Use Spray against a Bear”
    Me: ”You First”.

    • @Zentailium
      @Zentailium หลายเดือนก่อน

      They love to throw around these phrases because the urbantards know they arent getting in these situations themselves and choose not to care

  • @TheBarbariangamers
    @TheBarbariangamers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    You need more viewers. This is criminally under rated

  • @KrOnIc343
    @KrOnIc343 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    The funny thing is about the whole compensating for something arguement led to a research study and found out that gun owners are typically bigger than non-gun owners in that aspect 😂

    • @altechelghanforever9906
      @altechelghanforever9906 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Imma need a source fam.

    • @colinwhalen2632
      @colinwhalen2632 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@altechelghanforever9906fr lol, who is polling that lmao

    • @PHAGGOAT38
      @PHAGGOAT38 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@altechelghanforever9906 i got a source for ya.

    • @queuedjar4578
      @queuedjar4578 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      The classic tactic of sex obsessed people; start talking about dicks when you have no talking points. And how dare they assume the gender of a gun owner!

  • @gastari429
    @gastari429 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Related to the "join the military if you wanna play soldier", i WILL NEVER get mad at any person telling me i play soldier, you know why? Because its the most FUN you can have without all the DOWNS of being a soldier. Me going out to the shooting range in whatever clothes and gear I CHOOSE to go out in, shooting however and how long I LIKE as long as it's safe, modyfing my weapon how I LIKE, training with all of it whenever and wherever I LIKE and have a nice snack of whatever I CHOOSE, playing soldier is the best, i served in my country's military, i could not go take a shit without telling another dude who is the same age but put in charge of me and in some cases waiting for his permission, WAITING FOR A PERSON TO GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO GO TAKE A DUMP!

    • @-JMSDF-Dama
      @-JMSDF-Dama หลายเดือนก่อน

      larp

    • @gowanlore2434
      @gowanlore2434 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      >NOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T LARP AND HAVE FUN YOU CHUD

  • @leosypher9993
    @leosypher9993 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Red flag laws are some of the most callous, uncaring and harmful laws on this list, they actively stigmatize talking about issues, encourage people to bottle feeling up and keep quiet, and issue a consequence for talking about these issues, its downright dangerous and just shows how little anyone with these arguments care about peoples personal issues

    • @TheBeardHampster1979
      @TheBeardHampster1979 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Seriously, I hate this paranoid mentality that seems to be dominating people today. 99.99% of legal gun owners are not going to hurt you. If the damn media didn't fear monger so much about mass shootings, something you're less likely to experience than winning the fucking lottery, then we could actually deal with real issues.

  • @Nightflyermike
    @Nightflyermike 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    I must say, as someone who often gets bored doing any kind of political research due to how dry it's presented , this video is, concise, informative, and entertaining. Thank you for making this.

  • @KSTDA
    @KSTDA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Bro...the first 40 seconds got me feeling some type of way reloading a Lever gun from the bottom like a shotgun, despite the loading gate being on the side

  • @Ravello1111111111111111111
    @Ravello1111111111111111111 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Bad people have guns. Bad people in positions of power have guns. I want to protect myself and family and cats from bad people with guns. What’s wrong with that

  • @caelumrobocop
    @caelumrobocop 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    in conclusion, drill a third hole

    • @Frank451Martin
      @Frank451Martin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Other option, get wires of some kind and welded in a weird U.

    • @jimjam742
      @jimjam742 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      nahhh JB-Weld that shit on the inside of the receiver and forgo the selector position notch for that "sleeper" build aesthetic 🤣
      *in Minecraft of course*

    • @Milsurp_Loot_Drop
      @Milsurp_Loot_Drop 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@jimjam742 Love the new JB-Weld update that allows me to do cool shit with my ri- I mean crossbow.

    • @JacobWillits
      @JacobWillits หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In conclusion, manufacture open bolt m3 grease gun which already saved the world from itself before gratatata

  • @A_Pinocheat
    @A_Pinocheat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +183

    Thank God you addressed the Bible argument, it always ticked me off when some "expert" pulls that card out, and you have to explain good and evil fight, and the evil doesn't really like to hear that.

    • @AstroPkReal
      @AstroPkReal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m surprised a bible argument was used since the idea of gun control is more left leaning and religious text as evidence is many used by the right.

    • @daggerace9918
      @daggerace9918 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Luke 22:36. self defense and Christianity are not mutually exclusive

    • @AstroPkReal
      @AstroPkReal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@A_Pinocheat the bible argument doesn’t work against people who don’t believe in christianity lol

    • @hlljmper
      @hlljmper 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You also forgot to mention how the only people who ever bring up the Bible argument are shitlib Reddit atheists who have nothing but contempt and hatred towards Christianity.
      It's the same energy as when they say "Jesus once said to vaguely be nice, therefore you have to be blindly accepting of everything" to justify shit like illegal immigration or transitioning minors

    • @Cigaretteboat6251
      @Cigaretteboat6251 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@AstroPkReal "I'm gonna challenge your morality, despite having none myself"
      I've always told others that any argument levied against the moral from immoral people is a moot point. We're not on equal spiritual ground to have a rational argument if one side has no character, spiritually. Glad others are starting to agree

  • @Sumschmuck
    @Sumschmuck 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +138

    "The Bible says killing is bad, so you should give up your gun"
    Me: Well, it's a good thing I'm atheist.

    • @dantepizza6310
      @dantepizza6310 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      To murder is evil, but even god knew you might need to kill to protect your flock.
      The line itself correctly says to murder, not to kill.
      Which is why using the bible in that way is false, and hence the arguement is used only by betrayers and liars.

    • @20tigerpaw20
      @20tigerpaw20 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      "points to all the times God told the children of israel to level cities because they would corrupt the children of israel, then points to the one time they didnt and got corrupted by the city.

    • @fornax5798
      @fornax5798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@20tigerpaw20 Although of course, there are other certain verses that can be interpreted in whatever way the reader wants, god forbid a policymaker. There are also a lot of discontent in how the books link with each other as well.

    • @damil5721
      @damil5721 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Jesus said sell your cloak, buy a sword.

    • @fornax5798
      @fornax5798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@damil5721 Interpretation 1 out of Infinity: "When Jesus said "sell your cloak and buy a sword," it is generally interpreted as a symbolic statement warning his disciples about the imminent persecution they would face, urging them to be prepared for hardship and spiritual readiness rather than advocating for literal violence; essentially, they should be ready to sacrifice everything, even their basic necessities, to stand firm in their faith despite opposition.", different context of gun ownership as we aren't restricting gun rights for just Christians. Of course, call me crazy, but there is also perhaps maybe a slim chance that religious views don't really align with the modern needs.

  • @DANISHINFANTRY
    @DANISHINFANTRY 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    It’s not the guns that are the problem, it’s the certain types of people, the normal gun owners are fine

    • @ArosianStagg
      @ArosianStagg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      blame the guy not the gun. we use cars all the time as transportation, then there are people who run into crowds with their cars, should we ban cars or make it harder to own a car?

    • @joshwist556
      @joshwist556 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ⁠@@ArosianStaggwe already restrict cars via licenses and We still have shitty drivers despite that.

    • @jewmanchoolee466
      @jewmanchoolee466 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      One is a privlege the other is a right

    • @caioanimation1254
      @caioanimation1254 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ArosianStaggcars have really strict laws though wdym

    • @nameynamd9212
      @nameynamd9212 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'd suggest a mental wellness evaluation, but that could very well end up worse than any gun restricting law passing

  • @plasmapro6651
    @plasmapro6651 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    still remember when a gun graber group came to my high school, and would go to classes to "educate" on advocating for stricter gun laws (This was in NYC), and I would call out on their bs statistics with proof, and it only led me to get ridiculed by them and my peers, and I wouldn't back down from my stance, and it felt better knowing that I was able to discuss it with other people who actually wanted to hear the other side, I for one can't wait to leave this awful state someday, and go somewhere that doesn't infringe on my rights.

  • @DlK69
    @DlK69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    31:53 the term Buyback is one of their sneakiest types of framing that flies under the radar of most people.
    for someone being able to buy back anything they had to previously owned it.

    • @trecherousnuts9011
      @trecherousnuts9011 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not to mention the obvious elephant in the room, being the criminals with firearms. Whether obtained legally or not, we're supposed to just give the benefit of the doubt that they're gonna give all of their firearms, the ones used obviously to commit crimes. Gang culture and criminal activity rates now in the US show why buybacks will fail.

    • @LoneStarGrizzly
      @LoneStarGrizzly หลายเดือนก่อน

      Buybacks = Confiscation
      If your local or state government issues a mandatory gun buyback program,
      DO. NOT. COMPLY!

  • @xmintyx
    @xmintyx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    15:06 While the average gun owner obviously believes anyone of any race or gender should be allowed to own firearms, there are historical accounts of “conservative” politicians, including Reagan during his governorship of California, limiting gun rights of minorities. Reagan’s prohibition of concealed and open carry without permit was a direct response to the Black Panther Party’s march on the capitol of California on May, 2nd 1967 in protest of tightening restrictions on black gun owners at the time.

    • @aidanshelton6875
      @aidanshelton6875 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was gonna say, bro gave a very dishonest representation of what that rhetoric is about. The gun rights that white people know have often not applied to minority communities. The NRA might not be calling for minorities to not have gun rights, but they don’t say shit when a black man is murdered in a routine traffic stop after informing the cop he has a firearm on him or when Breonna Taylor’s boyfriend shoots to defend his home from what he thought were burglars bc the cops didn’t identify themselves

    • @garrettgoss2691
      @garrettgoss2691 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So any group, regardless of how violent and militant they are, should be allowed to march on the capital with firearms?

  • @Jazzafritsch
    @Jazzafritsch หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The crazy part with the Australian situation is
    1. Guns are still everywhere most farmers own a shotgun at a minimum
    2. Illegal guns are still everywhere criminals will always find a way after all
    3. You can still get a gun its just a long an expensive process
    So we didnt really "solve" any gun issues just complicated the whole situation further

    • @gifthorse3675
      @gifthorse3675 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The criminals in these restrictive countries just don’t waste their ammo on mass shootings but they do have guns.

  • @ima_bread
    @ima_bread 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    how about instead of banning guns, they fix the crime problem. Laws are only followed by law abiding citizens, a criminal will just find new ways to commit crimes

    • @group555_
      @group555_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And as every other first world country shows those others ways are so much better than the gun issues the us has now.

    • @ima_bread
      @ima_bread 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@group555_ yeah , like Switzerland

    • @TheGhostFart
      @TheGhostFart 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@group555_ don't look up the racial statistics for gun crime or where it's concentrated

    • @thekamotodragon
      @thekamotodragon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ima_bread Switz is suck an annoying example lol, they always use it without acknowledging their cultural differences or different demographics. People own them there, but it's viewed as a societal responsibility and club activity essentially. Their elitist culture and mandatory military service make how they view ownership entirely different. It's still a completely "controlled" activity there, they aren't like us in terms of it being a right, so the idea that they're the "model" country is completely ridiculous.

    • @ima_bread
      @ima_bread 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@thekamotodragon good point, different countries need different approaches

  • @DlK69
    @DlK69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Greeting from Germany my Friend, the 2nd Amendment is one of the most valuabe things the US has.
    Gun laws over here are awful, but it used to be less awful.
    I was born in '99 and i'm part of the last generations that remembers a time before private gun Owners got the Obligation to store the Guns and Ammo in their Homes in two different Safes.
    Back in my Childhood one of our Guns was stored openly in our Kitchen.

    • @DlK69
      @DlK69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      An interesting sidenote: there are European Countries that also have relative free Gun laws.
      Czechia, Lithuania and Estonia.
      ALL other Countries DO NOT have relative free Gun laws, including Switzerland.
      It's not legal for normal People to carry in Switzerland... it triggers me to high Hell and back if Americans claim that that mountainous small Nation has allright Gun laws.
      Even a hypothetical Country that would only allow it's Citizens to carry stuff like Cap and Ball Guns would have better Gun laws than Switzerland.

    • @Devin7Eleven
      @Devin7Eleven 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DlK69 I would maybe add Poland too.

    • @DlK69
      @DlK69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Devin7Eleven Poland isn't a Country with a shall issue carry license system as far as i'm aware.
      I don't count Countries that i know have a may issue carry license systeminstead of a shall issue system as having good Gun laws...
      Slovakia for example has a may issue system and isn't overly cautious but you still could not get the permit for some silly reason.

    • @januszpolak254
      @januszpolak254 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Devin7Eleven Poland is very strict when it comes to obtaining gun license. If you pass all those requirements you are free to go as our law kinda does not expect anyone but police and military to carry due how hard is to obtain this license.

    • @PopeOfTheBullpuptistChurch
      @PopeOfTheBullpuptistChurch 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I’m not German, but I’m a big fan of your country’s one and only JStark. He took action designing the FGC-9, and even in death has empowered people wanting to protect themselves with firearms to be able to do so regardless of the whims of a state government.

  • @Stop_Motion_Hub
    @Stop_Motion_Hub 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    me when the mass poopers meet the mass pissers

  • @j_tha_panther
    @j_tha_panther 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    50BMG doesn’t even destroy a coyote, let alone 5.56 idk why they use the “destroy the meat” stuff still😂

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you seen what .50 BMG does at close range?

    • @j_tha_panther
      @j_tha_panther 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @ have you?

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@j_tha_panther No but I have seen what it does on humans. And I am fairly certain coyotes are smaller in terms of body mass.

    • @theKashConnoisseur
      @theKashConnoisseur หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@emberfist8347 It really depends on which kind of 50BMG round is being used. an FMJ round at close range just passes through most targets and leaves a ragged 50 caliber hole in it's wake. However, a raufoss round that has an HEI payload leaves a smoking crater in the target. But it's not doing that because of the sheer ballistic power of the cartridge. It's because of the RDX they shoved in the projectile.

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theKashConnoisseur Still a .50 caliber is nothing to sneeze at. It is 20,000 joules of energy that can hit you. For reference a M885A1 5.56 round FMJ still remains under 2,000 joules.

  • @SonOfTheDawn515
    @SonOfTheDawn515 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Here is my retort to ALL arguments against any and all rights - "I don't care. Rights are rights. You don't get to dictate anything to me."

    • @Burtocd
      @Burtocd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I prefer the retort of FPC..."Fuck you. No."

  • @Sgt_Kilborn
    @Sgt_Kilborn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    This is a good video, but I'll remind everyone that the time for arguing is long past. These people are zealots and they hate you. No amount of arguing will change their religious belief that the State is God and that you shouldn't be able to defend yourself from it. Stop playing by their rules

    • @frogonlilypad
      @frogonlilypad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      can't change the minds of the politicians that hate us, but we can change the minds of the voters that don't know any better

    • @ZeonicZaku1-Zeon_Grunt_Suit
      @ZeonicZaku1-Zeon_Grunt_Suit 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@frogonlilypadthat's implying that checking a box on paper is equivalent to true political action. Get real, who controls politics is whoever can monopolize violence at that current point in time.

    • @Mis73rRand0m
      @Mis73rRand0m 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Omit "at that current time" and you're correct; the ones that use government to justify coercion are the ones that control the politics. It doesn't matter which side wins; they still end up doing the same thing which is benefitting the groups riding the status quo.
      The left radicals that have already attempted to vote with a bullet feel this lack of agency but have been aimed at the wrong target so to speak; the one person claiming to shake up the status quo. I expect nothing to actually change if he wins but his populist rhetoric is at least a reflection of popular opinion, and possibly chumming the waters for future political sharks.

    • @joshuabacker2363
      @joshuabacker2363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@frogonlilypad You probably can't ngl. Most of those voters who are antigun are antigun for emotional causes. Their 'arguments' and rationale are products of their emotions, rather than vice versa, so you can never, ever argue with them and see any change.

    • @frogonlilypad
      @frogonlilypad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@joshuabacker2363 the people i'm talking about aren't strongly anti-gun, not the people that have already made up their minds, just the people that don't know any better and would make different decisions if they had more information

  • @sethwilliams888
    @sethwilliams888 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Every single one of these arguements is shut down by saying "Criminals dont follow the law anyways" well, that WOULD work if the people saying these things had a brain

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Weird...... gun crime is farrrr lower in other nations that have gun control... wonder why us is special

    • @-Mintyy
      @-Mintyy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@deezboyeed6764check out violent crime and knife crime in general in those countries. also those countries weren’t literally FOUNDED on the premise that every individual is born with certain rights.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @-Mintyy Cool, still less deaths over all. The US has equally high knife crime and violent crime with guns on top. Not sure whats hard to understand about that. Your country was also founded on slavery yet you guys (albiet late and requiring an entire war over it) figured out it was wrong

    • @naitor2594
      @naitor2594 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@deezboyeed6764 13% of the US population is not white

    • @mtf-alpha-1
      @mtf-alpha-1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@deezboyeed6764 werid.. how stats and studies can be totally biased! But then again you probably get them from CNN, because newsflash, and if you even watched the video (which you probably didn’t since your attention span is so low) again gun crime stats get lumped in with self deletions, neglect discharges, and also not to mention the fact that the other countries they you say have “less gun crimes” then America has their government slowly starting to take away their rights aye? But I mean surely the government wouldn’t do that! The government couldn’t do anything wrong right buddy?

  • @z3r0_35
    @z3r0_35 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    45:20 A better argument against this particular point is that if someone is willing to kill me to take my gun, they were probably going to kill me anyway, they just want to be sure I can't shoot back. So, yes, I would put my life on the line to avoid being disarmed, because if that's even a question I'm faced with for real, then I've really got nothing to lose.

  • @SpartanPZR
    @SpartanPZR หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What made me pro gun when I was a kid was learning that the germans invented and used poison gas in WW1. Then complained that the U.S. was using trench guns (shotguns) and it was inhumane. After all that carnage. They got upset over a shotgun. Rick roll.

    • @Zippoguy338
      @Zippoguy338 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      the trench shotgun was real quiet after it met the mp 18

  • @Ofxzh
    @Ofxzh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    People see the government the same way they see their religious figures. “If I believe in them, devote my life to them, then they’ll love and protect me!”.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nope nobody sees their government that way. Your paranoid schizophrenia is showing

    • @ContentEnjoyer-gm3ky
      @ContentEnjoyer-gm3ky 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except you could actually count on the same entity that created you. At the end of the day. Governments are run by humans.

  • @chillpotato7239
    @chillpotato7239 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    On the last arguments of “the tyrannical government will be to strong to defend against” is ridiculous because right now as we speak in Myanmar a tyrannical government that’s supported by china is currently being fought by literal teenagers with 3d printed guns. These kids are fighting a war against a government which has tanks, jets, drones and a full on military and they’re slowly winning. Interesting to note that this conflict has been barely covered on the news and our government has done nothing to help these freedom fighters in their effort to restore their democratic county. Maybe cough cough it’s because they can’t make money off of them?

    • @subjekt5577
      @subjekt5577 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Hell the US lost in Vietnam even after burning down half the jungle
      Russia is in a stalemate with Ukraine and needed to call in NK troops
      And all of that not to mention the rich don't want to rule over rubble or have their supply lines or services disrupted

    • @subjekt5577
      @subjekt5577 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      M.A.D works. You need to be able to pose a credible threat, lest the greedy bully think you're an easy mark to exploit.

    • @chillpotato7239
      @chillpotato7239 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@subjekt5577 facts but most people that make this argument don’t believe in their own beliefs and ideology of freedom if they don’t trust in themselves to in force it. You can’t be free with out being able to enforce it

  • @servicerifle16
    @servicerifle16 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Honestly most of the antis will go full mask-off 6th tier if you get them angry enough. I really think they just get aroused over the thought of forcing others to live like they do.

    • @deezboyeed6764
      @deezboyeed6764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You mean like the politicians pro gun morons vote for?

  • @jdm8640
    @jdm8640 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Came for the discussion stayed for the TF2.

  • @Nathan-u4p1t
    @Nathan-u4p1t 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."

  • @taxman3749
    @taxman3749 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I'll let them repeal the 2nd amendment, when they let me repeal the 19th.

    • @jumbojoshonmolly
      @jumbojoshonmolly 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      !!THE ABOVE USER WAS FOUND SLOSHING THE BIG SPLONK!!

    • @Brotherbear-er7rn
      @Brotherbear-er7rn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No bugger that just repeal the 19th

    • @gifthorse3675
      @gifthorse3675 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s a bad trade

  • @jacka1472
    @jacka1472 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    hello, i've just watched your video an it was an excellent watch
    As an Australian and a firearm enthusiast I wanted to add on a few points;
    1 - There are more private firearms in circulation in Australia than there was in 1996 and before any other point in history
    2 - Australia's peak of firearm ownership during 2020-2022 saw its lowest murder rate in history and is continually low despite extreme highs of private ownership
    3 - gel blasters are prohibited weapons in WA and VIC, controlled weapon in QLD, a CAT A firearm in SA and prohibited firearms (i,e machine guns) in every other state/territory
    4 - Firearms licencing/registries have been used for exactly what you would say would happen - In 2015 owners of lever action shotguns risked losing their licence if they held more than 5 rounds, in 2023, firearm owners of rifles in WA larger than .300 WIN MAG had their firearms seized due to a legislation change and again in 2024 firearm owners are having their firearms seized due to another change in legislation about 'prohibited persons', i.e a person who had an assualt charge 20years ago, applied for a firearms licence, got denied, appealed the decision and was granted a licence is now having it revoked.
    5- gun control has not prevent criminals from getting firearms, in QLD bikies have full auto SKS and in VIC immigrant gangs are giving 17 years olds full-auto type 56 rifles and in Sydney there is a drive by shooting every week.

  • @propane_salesman
    @propane_salesman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is one of the greatest TH-cam videos I've ever seen. You've earned an enthusiastic subscriber.

  • @mywifeleftme8259
    @mywifeleftme8259 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yesterday I was at my cousins and we got in an argument about guns he tried to use the “because grips and stocks make guns more accurate that means it’s more deadly”

    • @KE8NUF
      @KE8NUF หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Wait until he hears about the Turkish shooter in the Olympics

    • @Akluvingopnik
      @Akluvingopnik หลายเดือนก่อน

      @KE8NUF An airgun no less

  • @lastfirst5863
    @lastfirst5863 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    These people always forget that all those fancy war machines are great at warring, and not so great at policing.
    An F-35 can’t stand on the street corner and direct traffic, nor can it clear a building. A USN Carrier fleet isn’t going to break down your door at 3 in the morning, show you a search and seize warrant and look for contraband.
    I do kinda want to see tanks doing pit maneuvers though, that sounds like it could be fun to watch.

    • @theKashConnoisseur
      @theKashConnoisseur หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Regardless of how advanced a country's air force and navy is, at the end of the day, teams of men armed with rifles and pistols are what is needed to occupy territory and take mission-critical objectives. The tanks and the planes and the artillery simply aid those men in making their way to the objectives. The fancy machines are really good at destroying infrastructure, but they don't work well _at all_ when you need to take a piece of infrastructure without breaking it.

  • @markotto4281
    @markotto4281 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm from Detroit. Gun control means consistently hitting what you aim at. Simple as.

  • @MartinTheGroomer
    @MartinTheGroomer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You should make that video on the arms trade treaty that sounds like a super interesting rabbit hole

  • @wargriffin5
    @wargriffin5 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "I can now debunk EVERY reason why I shouldn't have a gun!"
    "You can't afford it."
    *"F*CK!"*

  • @angelosdiamantidis8269
    @angelosdiamantidis8269 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    the last teer needs mental help Jesus

  • @Truckman74
    @Truckman74 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Watching a lever action be loaded from the bottom when there is an obvious side gate pains me

  • @appalachian_autist
    @appalachian_autist 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    One that you forgot (likely in tier 3) is the "x amount of school 'poopings' this year," argument. What those articles do is take unrelated incidents that happened off school property, NDs/ADs, Tazer deployments, and actual airsoft guns, and put them into that list to inflate numbers. I'd wager that these lists of the dozens of school 'incidents' in an alotted time, are at least 95% what I mentioned earlier.

    • @zacharykelly7434
      @zacharykelly7434 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They also exclude gang related ones which inflatecthe numbers around 1k%

  • @uhagi6720
    @uhagi6720 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Biggest problem is that guns are a significant part of US Culture, yet we are all taught literally nothing about them in our education system, causing many anti-gun individuals to base their knowledge on the civilian market from various movies, games and TV shows.
    Also, the biggest thing I noticed is that a lot of anti-gun individuals would rather the military and police be the only ones to have firearms, yet at the same time, they agree with gun owners that lazy/corrupt cops can easily cause you to wait for hours or not even come at all.
    If you agree that cops are not reliable in the US, then why would you ONLY want them to have access to firearms? Sure, I could get some pepperspray or a taser, but why would I want tools that disorient a threat when I could get a gun and immediately stop that threat without further risks to my safety?
    We also gotta ask: What about the elderly? The physically disabled? The physically weak? Should they just be left with no means to protect their own lives while being some of the easiest targets for crime?

  • @darkshn1475
    @darkshn1475 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    @13:40 HOLY FUCK! I really thought that his name was Raul Menendez, I nearly shat myself!

  • @CB_On_The_Beat
    @CB_On_The_Beat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video was so well thought out, researched, and then put together that I have nothing but applause. format was awesome kind of like a Bladed Angel video

  • @PedroCosta-po5nu
    @PedroCosta-po5nu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Bro uploading at midnight 💀

  • @afoxinaviators4105
    @afoxinaviators4105 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The suppressor thing will never cease to baffle me. You KNOW the government has no clue what they're doing when something a draconian police state like the UK considers a 'safety device' is instead a highly-regulated NFA item in the 'Land of the "Free"'

    • @Freedommanbutthesecond2
      @Freedommanbutthesecond2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      “Baffle” heheheh

    • @scrittle
      @scrittle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you considered the potential harm suppressors can have in a busy crowd? The loud bangs from an unsuppressed gun gives the signal to scatter in the event of a rogue firearm handler, if it's muted, the only tell will be the screams.

    • @afoxinaviators4105
      @afoxinaviators4105 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @scrittle Have you ever heard a suppressed weapon? Unless they are shooting subsonic ammo it still sounds like a loud bang. Real life is not like the movies.

    • @scrittle
      @scrittle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@afoxinaviators4105 Check out a few suppressor videos (Average Gunslinger's '300 Blackout AR Suppressed) and you'll quickly realise how wrong you are.

    • @afoxinaviators4105
      @afoxinaviators4105 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @scrittle yes, 300BLK, a round designed specifically for subsonic use on short-barreled suppressed weapons is indeed quite quiet, just like I said above. However, on almost every other weapon it is not as quiet. I don't need to watch videos on it, as I have been around and fired suppressed weapons in real life, and the volume varies based upon build and caliber. But hey, I'm absolutely willing to take the risk that someone makes a high speed silent 300blk build and uses it in a mass shooting, because the chances of that are pretty fucking slim.
      Your argument is like trying to say we need to ban engines because someone can make a car that goes over the speed limit.

  • @royalred9798
    @royalred9798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    As a resident of Illinois, it makes me cringe how you say.
    Illinois. The s is silent.
    But it's all good, lol😂

    • @wubbabubba1686
      @wubbabubba1686  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Gonna blame that on my schools, all my teachers in my life called it Illinois with a s 😭

  • @RezaQin
    @RezaQin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No such thing as an assault rifle, btw. Just like how America is a Republic, not a democracy...

    • @emberfist8347
      @emberfist8347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No there is such a thing. He used the correct definition.

    • @zacharykelly7434
      @zacharykelly7434 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lean into it. It can be an LMG it doesn't matter. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED don't give an inch

    • @garrettgoss2691
      @garrettgoss2691 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The Founding Fathers literally owned cannons and a fucking Navy, not an inch should be given. Never another Wounded Knee

  • @tenshi6293
    @tenshi6293 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "You do realize members of the military and LE have souls, right?"
    Lost it, absolutely lost it

  • @person9473
    @person9473 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I put my 8 day Talk Tuah podcast marathon on pause to watch this video.