Finally someone who is a real filmmaker and doesn’t care about sensor size, and appreciates what a good camera really is! I am a Sony, RED and Lumix Shooter, I love my Sony cameras but I grab my Lumix GH6 and S5II when I need some reliable features packed cameras all the time, I shoot sony for photos and socials mainly. Great video Jason and much respect !
@@gurugamer8632 There's never a general answer for that. No camera is the best at everything. You need to understand your needs in order to decide which camera is the best option for you. If you need lowlight performance, autofocus, and a full frame sensor then use the FX3. If you need a low profile, low budget, slow motion, stabilization, good colors, and overall versatility, then get the GH7.
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema They have VariCam but they always pushed features down to Lumix Cameras. so they did have a line to protect but did it anyway! even more respectful.
Great analysis! I’ve been using the Lumix GH7 for a month now, and I can confidently say it’s a remarkable tool for videographers. The image quality and ergonomics truly stand out. Looking forward to exploring its capabilities further!
Boost I.S. Is meant for tripod static shots when handholding. Be careful when walking around and panning on it because it will cause jitters and I think it hurts the sensor a bit. Other than that E-stabilization on high is so good. I use the LUMIX G9ii Microfourthirds all the way for me.
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema Ken is right, I.S is meant for when you don't have a tripod but need a shot to look "locked-off". So best to have that off if you're moving / walking, etc 👍
I have watched everyone review this camera. This is the most refreshing review so far. Everyone has used sensor size as a caveat. It was so refreshing to not here about the sensor size as an excuse!
Yeah especially considering sensor size is wildly overrated for filmmaking. The DoF possible using M43 is plenty for video when you’re controlling your lighting at all times
Sensor size in filmmaking doesn’t make much of a difference. Except depth of field. I think most people forget to use lights and their image is just not how they want because larger full frame sensor are more forgiving
*Panasonic was my FIRST interchangeable Camera. The G7 & G85. I switched to Sony because at that time their Auto Focus Sucked and I had both Cameras for 2years so I switched to Sony and have Been happy ever since*
I had both for a long time, still have but when lumix dropped full frame then PD game over if your a hybrid shooter or do more video ! if only lenses all worked between all bodies be a different story i think!
Yes!! You are awesome, i Love diversity in Cameras, as you mentioned cameras are Tools for different types of Jobs and scenarios. Am grateful for the video.
Delighted to see this review of this impressive camera!!, Lumix truly provides its cameras with impressive features!, no one gives so much for less. good job!
I really appreciate you being open-minded about the right tool for the right job rather than being a sensor size/brand elitist. I respect that. Thank you for doing a Sony ZV-E1 vs GH7 video stabilization test. It's super helpful for me. I have a A7C and I'm doing more video work for clients lately. Video stabilization is non-existent on the A7C and I dislike using gimbals, so I've been thinking about getting a GH7 with the 12-35 f/2.8 Leica because of the stabilization and workflow ease with open gate recording. But, I already own five Sony lenses. I was thinking, instead of getting the Lumix, I can get the ZV-E1 because of the dynamic active stabilization, AI autofocus and incredible low light sensor. Your video stabilization tests and comments about how back and forth movements are pretty much the same level of stabilization on both cameras has sealed the deal for me... I'm going with the Sony ZV-E1. Another thing I notice that not many people talk about is the video quality of m4/3 compared to FF. In your DOF tests at 7:36, the Sony camera is noticeably sharper and has better contrast. You can see more detail in the shot (it could be the lens). Extremely high detail may not be as important for video, but, I'd rather have more detail and take it away with filters/in post rather than having to add detail/sharpness in post. Update: I bought a Sony ZV-E1 and tested it over two days. I returned it. The dynamic active stabilization is great for walking shots and push in/push out stuff, but if you do any kind of panning shot or try to orbit around something (ex: around a completed dish at a restaurant) then the movement is jerky. It's like the camera sometimes does micro-pauses and then jerks over. It just doesn't look good. Adding stabilization in post makes the whole frame wobble during the jerk moments. I really wanted to keep it because of the uncropped 60 fps, fantastic low light performance and AI auto-focus, but for my use-case, it just doesn't work. I'm sticking with a Sony A7C and I bought an RS 3 Mini. It's lightweight compared to my RS3 and gives me the smoothness I need.
yeah super hard to say. I really don't like comparing camera systems as there is far too much to consider than just the camera itself. In my honest opinion the ZV-E1 is different to the GH7 so really hard to choose between the two. GH7 definitely is a work horse with filmmakers and videographers. THe ZV-E1 downfall is just lack of cinema features like the GH7 but the full frame depth of field and sony e does make it super compelling
Depending upon your needs, you might want to look at the A7CII as well. I own both ZV-E1 and A7CII. The only reason I keep the ZV-E1 is for 4k 60p and 120p. Otherwise, I always go for the A7CII. I think its image looks much better, even in low light (probably due to oversampling a 33MP sensor versus 12MP). The only downside on the A7CII is the rolling shutter if that's important for your type of shooting.
@@tvid777 Hey man, thanks for chiming in! I updated my comment detailing how I bought a Sony ZV-E1 but returned it, check it out for more context. The A7C is fine for that I'm doing now but I will definitely look at the A7CII in the future. Thanks for the recommendation!
@@yousefcreative That panning scenario that you mentioned is a problem for me too. I've shot both sony and panasonic for years. Panasonic stabilization for that type of use is exceptional. That one issue almost made me trade in the sony, but panasonic doesn't yet have a small form factor competitor (S9 was interesting but left out a few things I want).
Dude great video! Also just little headsup at 9:55 the left and right movement is because the Boost I.S is ON, you would only use that setting in lock off positions when you want your camera to look like a tripod. Otherwise the results would have been better with it off :) but GREAT video! Love seeing you brand off into the world of Lumix!
I have a GH6. I don't use the external record option, although I did try it, because I need to use the USB-C to supply power. I shoot live theatre, concerts and dance shows so my run times are pretty long. I bought a 2TB CF Express type B card. I can record 5.7k ProRes to this card while still recording 4k on my Ninja V. For me, because of the type of work I do a deeper depth of field is an advantage.
There's a new accessory from Panasonic, which is a dummy battery with a USB-C connection called DCC18. It was created to solve this issue, allowing users to power the camera through the dummy battery and leaving the USB port on camera open for the external recording.
Really leaning on GH7 as my permanent B cam. No matter what main camera I have the GH7 is really standing out to be a forever cam. You could make plenty of professional work for years to come and the small form factor makes it nice as a gimbal cam, drone cam or even a travel/street cam. The Fujinon MK18-55 T2.9 and a Lumix prime with leica glass and you're done. I have a ton of sony gear but really think this can fill a lot of gaps my main camera might do, but bigger and heavier. Interesting times we live in. I'm still waiting for the nex FX camera but if it's too pricey or not for me I'm grabbing the GH7.
Yeah a permanent B cam is such a good idea. Mainly because this thing has pretty much everything most people need. The biggest key is lens choices and investing in M43 system
Great Review, the BOOST IS will have "Pan" rejection that why it looks snappy, you can use it when wanting to hold it and lock the camera like handheld tripod mode.
Panasonic has been including shutter angle and waveforms in their cams at many different price point since 2017. Protecting your cinema line is no excuse anymore. Get with the program Sony, you are the charging 3k+ for a camera and don’t include these? This is all software. Just stop.
@@iyason6878 his comment is about value for money. Clearly he's a Sony customer that is getting frustrated by the fact that Sony charges more and the customer ends up getting less when compared to the value of the products coming from Panasonic Lumix, who offer more but charge less. It's a fair, legitimate statement.
I wanted the GH7 so bad! I've been running with the GH5 for almost 6 years now and it felt like a great next step... but I shoot real estate with a lot of dark rooms and walking/moving interviews where reliable autofocus would absolutely make my life so much easier. I know I'm going to miss waveforms and that incredible handheld IBIS.
Great review! This camera is wildly underrated, wish I could justify the upgrade. I shoot Sony a7siii and Panny GH6 (usually rigged out with a huuuuge Nikkor 400mm f/3.5 AIS and follow focus) - each system has their own use case. It’s nice to have to be able to pick from the two based on what I’m filming, especially for wildlife. As an aside, compared to Sony I very much prefer the menu system and overall handling of Lumix. Def subjective tho.
ZV-E1 has Sony's old IBIS, with 5 stops of stabilization. You need the A7R V and newer to get 7-8 stops of correction. Looks just like the GH7 and most m4/3 cameras' stabilization at that point.
Yeah agreed. The tough thing with people like me as I am heavily invested in Sony we don't tend to look elsewhere if our cameras are doing their job I guess. Plus it means we would need to invest in lenses in that system. It surely opened my eyes wider for other systems that's for sure
Lumix is a good choice for video capabilities at a reasonable price. Also, since they do not make that many models, it leaves more time to cover Sony, so it should not overwhelm you.
M4/3 is definitely advantages in some aspects like wildlife for example, but the DOF is a deal breaker for me as a corporate/event shooter because you can stop down a full frame lens to f16 and get sharp DOF, but you can't open up a M4/3 lens to f1 when you need it. For instance, a 24-70mm f2.8 lens on full frame is decently shallow for most situations. On a M4/3 sensor, you'd need a 12-35mm f1.4 to give you an equivalent look, which doesn't exist. It's just nice to have the flexibility to be shallow without having to switch to prime lenses in the middle of an event.
Lens choice is the main concern. I do not see any hint Panasonic will release other high end zooms. The last exciting lens Panasonic released was in 2021, the 25-50 f1.7. And if you want the best low light and more shallow dof from a zoom. Your option is still the old way using speedbooster with sigma 18-35 and 50-100 f1.8.
yeah but metabones just released an update which makes their speedbooster work will with gh7 auto-focus, which makes those sigma lenses an amazing option for this camera
Yeah that is tough considering canon and Sony have f1.2 lenses and even after market lenses so a touch faster. Sensor size does play a fairly big role here and Sony e is far more equiped in the lens department
Nice overview of the GH7! Just one note, only use the Boost I.S. when you are stationary and want a tripod-looking shot, otherwise, you get that hard adjustment when turning and walking. As a GH5 and G9 owner, I will probably get this or the G9 ii in a few years when the price drops as a B-cam, as I enjoy filming with Micro 4/3. Now that I've increased my photography output, I aim to get an S5ii and a couple of lenses as my new hybrid A-cam.
f/1.8 on MFT isn't something like, it's precisely f/3.6 on FF. Aperture being a ratio of focal length to iris diameter, f/3.6 on full frame refers to the same iris diameter. It will match not only depth of field, but also total light gathered. If you want to match your field of view and exposure, you also need to multiply your focal length by 2 and for ISO by 4. MFT is basically like using a full frame but quadrupling your image noise, all else being equal - with good lighting you won't be able to tell. The IBIS and 32bit float is awesome :)
Sorry but you are doing the stabilization test wrong. The Boost IS is meant for static shots mimicking tripod. You should turn it off when you are following people!! (I would say boost IS is a terrible and misleading name) Now I own both ZV-E1 and GH7, in my test GH7 is the first camera ever (besides iPhone) to achieve steady cam like "floaty" video. ZVE1 is good at active stabilization but the crop is huge and the image suffers from sudden movement way more often than GH7. There are many reasons why even with all the problems and bulky body, GH6 was still my main camera, not ZVE1. Now with GH7 it's more so.
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema Yeah, Lumix cameras are particularly complex. Hope you enjoy it. To me the image stabilization of GH cameras enabled a different workflow similar to how the DJI romin 4D enables. The GH workflow is handheld, rigged up with big screen for manual focus, no gimbal. The ibis and the weight gives you stability while the big screen and direct control makes your composition much more accurate. The Sony way is camera on a gimbal with autofocus, it’s a lot easier to get other benefits like very stable image and no worry about focusing, but you loose precise control, personally i think that’s one of the reasons behind the trend of people swing their Sony camera like crazy for those “dynamic shots”. The great thing about GH7 is those 2 styles of working are no longer mutually exclusive, you can mix and match them now, much more flexible.
Подходит спортсменка к тренеру: - я устала, я ухожу - а в чем проблема? У тебя же все в порядке, очень сильная, скоро чемпионат мира выиграем! - тренер, да у меня волосы от фармы растут там, где не должны. - где это? - на яйцах!
Just a quick note: the Boost I.S is meant to be used when the camera is still. It's kinda like a "tripod IBIS". In scenes with camera movement Lumix IBIS works best with Boost I.S turned off.
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema No problem, everyone who ever tried a Lumix camera for the first time has did this hahah Glad to see you experimenting with those cameras, they're really good!
Because the sensor is smaller, 2 x the lenses need to be brighter. 1.8 Full = 0.9 Crop x2 . to have a bouquet like 1.8 full you need a 0.9 lenses in MTF. It's hard to get these lenses but not impossible. Voightlander have a complete lineup of MFT lenses all in 0.9 10mm 17 mm 25mm 50 mm
7:17 You mean Far LESS Depth of Field. 🙂 IMO Wide Focal lengths could use less DOF on MFT but 25mm f1.7 DOF is perfect to me. Of course too tight to include alot of background at those focal lengths.
Don't get me wrong I like Lumix but I must stick with sony. Does it have anything to do with sister size well I take that back it does have to do with sensor size. When you are a wedding videographer it is very important. I brother have a camera that is good and low light and the Sony a7s3/fx3 you just can't beat. Yes I know you can film weddings with a lumix I've done plenty of them with it.
In my studio yes. Heavy magenta tones. My A7IV has slightly green tones so my standard LUT I use brings it neutral. I think I just needed more time to grade the image to how I want in the studio
Always good to see a Sony boy see what a great Product Panasonic has been making long before SONY came along to Mirrorless! The only thing that HELD Panasonic back was all the hype,about terrible AF "in video modes". However, most REAL FilmMakers came/come from manual focus backgrounds with cameras & lenses, so to most, AF didn't matter. However saying that, with the massive revolution of Content Creators, Vloggers, TH-cam, IG, TikTok, and many more, most didn't know or want to have to worry about focus, whereas with 2nd Gen A series cameras, Sony mirrorless had the best AF on the market, and took center stage for the past 6 years. However, those day are gone. Panasonic will now move into its proper place as one of the top 4 mirrorless camera makers.
@@Jagendra_vs video is pretty terrible. I’ve actually never seen a good image out of it- if you don’t absolutely nail your white balance. Outdoors it’s ok, indoors it’s really bad. We had all of the pro glass and all I will say. Photography wise, it’s phenomenal. Video sucks. Pre- amps are the only thing good about video mode on that camera
Gh7 looks great except for the price. Paying more than 1000 for a 4/3 camera is pure idiocy. Same with the ridiculous pricing on every Sony camera. In this day and age of smartphones and dji osmo going for 500-1000, there is no reason to spend more than this for 99 percent of buyers who don’t have the skill or talent to take advantage of the bigger sensors. Just a supreme waste of money.
I've always been a Lumix four-thirds user, but at 9:44, the Sony image looks like true cinema, while the Lumix resembles an iPhone image at best. I'm now convinced I won't spend another $0.01 on four-thirds cameras. I might as well go for a previous-gen full-frame Sony.
The image stabilization is much worse on the Sony, but the depth of field and focus are set perfectly on the Sony for that cinematic look. I wonder if there are settings that can be adjusted on the GH7 to achieve the same look as the Sony?
It´s not the camera, it´s the person behind it, what makes the diffrence, but the industry will make us believe something diffrent. Learn how to upgrade your skills and you can work 5-10 years with one camera.
My s5xii has dual native iso, when i shoot at iso 4000 and compared it to my G9II, i can tell the full frame is waaay waaay cleaner in the midtone and shadow areas, there's no way i'm downgrading to MFT, i regretted my decision, if i really want a downgrade, i can just use my iphone prores raw 😂😂😂😂
DOF and Ibis, sony's still better to me. And you chose the zv-e1. If you go with a combo of a7s3 and stabilizied lens like 24-105 f4 G OSS, you can have a better result. For the price, GH7 is a good camera but is still way behind others from Sony and Canon.
It certainly has a fair few features I’d love to have in my Sony cameras that’s for sure. I must admit full frame cameras are far more forgiving in if you make some mistakes, the sensor can save you a bit
the image quolity and the colors are so bad.. come on.. you have been paid by panasonic.. look at the charts.. panasonic is losing market shares.. I don't really get their strategy.. it's like they don't want to bother competition... pretty bad .. and they should refund gh owners after gh4 .. that was the last compelling one..
ahahahah so many lies nobody is switching to gh7 and it's a very bad camera.. in a world of full frame.. that is no longer a pro chocie panasonic should concentrate on the S5 instead of prepping out siater gh series.. i own a gh5 and it's by far the worst purchase.. i ever made.. very bad image quality no iso perfomrnace and artifacts.. sometimes very sometimes produces nice images.. but nontheless very low quality i am sure that gh7 is better but still useless for a pro it's a waist of money.. 7SIII by sony is the most compelling one.. period
![ALLY - OH MY! [ REACTION ] 'Amarin Nitibhon' #ALLY_OHMY #ALLY #allynitibhon #แอลลี่](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nX9qpHjVfbQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally someone who is a real filmmaker and doesn’t care about sensor size, and appreciates what a good camera really is! I am a Sony, RED and Lumix Shooter, I love my Sony cameras but I grab my Lumix GH6 and S5II when I need some reliable features packed cameras all the time, I shoot sony for photos and socials mainly.
Great video Jason and much respect !
Thank you. Yes. Most people just need to understand the tool they’re using and the pros and cons of that tool they have. Thanks for watching
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema exactly my point !
FX3 or GH7?
@@gurugamer8632 There's never a general answer for that. No camera is the best at everything. You need to understand your needs in order to decide which camera is the best option for you. If you need lowlight performance, autofocus, and a full frame sensor then use the FX3. If you need a low profile, low budget, slow motion, stabilization, good colors, and overall versatility, then get the GH7.
Loveeee all the features Panasonic throws into their cameras. Best in the business imo in that regard.
Yeah I agree. I think because they don’t have a “cinema line” to protect like Sony and canon do so they can throw more into it
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema very very true. Good take
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema They have VariCam but they always pushed features down to Lumix Cameras. so they did have a line to protect but did it anyway! even more respectful.
@@JasonMorrisphotocinemaYeah, fair point. Though I'm super amped for a proper cinema camera from Lumix
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema Excellent point about LUMIX not having a cinema line to protect. That could be a video in itself.
Great analysis! I’ve been using the Lumix GH7 for a month now, and I can confidently say it’s a remarkable tool for videographers. The image quality and ergonomics truly stand out. Looking forward to exploring its capabilities further!
Boost I.S. Is meant for tripod static shots when handholding. Be careful when walking around and panning on it because it will cause jitters and I think it hurts the sensor a bit.
Other than that E-stabilization on high is so good. I use the LUMIX G9ii
Microfourthirds all the way for me.
That makes sense. Realistically the lumix was far superior to the Sony in stabilisation anyway
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema Ken is right, I.S is meant for when you don't have a tripod but need a shot to look "locked-off". So best to have that off if you're moving / walking, etc 👍
I have watched everyone review this camera. This is the most refreshing review so far. Everyone has used sensor size as a caveat. It was so refreshing to not here about the sensor size as an excuse!
Yeah especially considering sensor size is wildly overrated for filmmaking. The DoF possible using M43 is plenty for video when you’re controlling your lighting at all times
Sensor size in filmmaking doesn’t make much of a difference. Except depth of field. I think most people forget to use lights and their image is just not how they want because larger full frame sensor are more forgiving
Great !! Love your point of view. And Lumix colour science looks organic. Beautiful images !!
*Panasonic was my FIRST interchangeable Camera. The G7 & G85. I switched to Sony because at that time their Auto Focus Sucked and I had both Cameras for 2years so I switched to Sony and have Been happy ever since*
absolutely. You found what works for you and your workflow. Super happy for you! Both systems have their case in a battle I must admit
I had both for a long time, still have but when lumix dropped full frame then PD game over if your a hybrid shooter or do more video ! if only lenses all worked between all bodies be a different story i think!
Yes!! You are awesome, i Love diversity in Cameras, as you mentioned cameras are Tools for different types of Jobs and scenarios.
Am grateful for the video.
Well hello there GH7, nice to see you here 👀 Great video brother 👊🏻
Haha thought you’d like this one.
Delighted to see this review of this impressive camera!!, Lumix truly provides its cameras with impressive features!, no one gives so much for less. good job!
Couldn't agree more!
Love how quickly the focus changed from you to the camera. Gotta love that SONY autofocus
I really appreciate you being open-minded about the right tool for the right job rather than being a sensor size/brand elitist. I respect that.
Thank you for doing a Sony ZV-E1 vs GH7 video stabilization test. It's super helpful for me. I have a A7C and I'm doing more video work for clients lately. Video stabilization is non-existent on the A7C and I dislike using gimbals, so I've been thinking about getting a GH7 with the 12-35 f/2.8 Leica because of the stabilization and workflow ease with open gate recording. But, I already own five Sony lenses.
I was thinking, instead of getting the Lumix, I can get the ZV-E1 because of the dynamic active stabilization, AI autofocus and incredible low light sensor. Your video stabilization tests and comments about how back and forth movements are pretty much the same level of stabilization on both cameras has sealed the deal for me... I'm going with the Sony ZV-E1.
Another thing I notice that not many people talk about is the video quality of m4/3 compared to FF. In your DOF tests at 7:36, the Sony camera is noticeably sharper and has better contrast. You can see more detail in the shot (it could be the lens). Extremely high detail may not be as important for video, but, I'd rather have more detail and take it away with filters/in post rather than having to add detail/sharpness in post.
Update: I bought a Sony ZV-E1 and tested it over two days. I returned it. The dynamic active stabilization is great for walking shots and push in/push out stuff, but if you do any kind of panning shot or try to orbit around something (ex: around a completed dish at a restaurant) then the movement is jerky. It's like the camera sometimes does micro-pauses and then jerks over. It just doesn't look good. Adding stabilization in post makes the whole frame wobble during the jerk moments.
I really wanted to keep it because of the uncropped 60 fps, fantastic low light performance and AI auto-focus, but for my use-case, it just doesn't work.
I'm sticking with a Sony A7C and I bought an RS 3 Mini. It's lightweight compared to my RS3 and gives me the smoothness I need.
yeah super hard to say. I really don't like comparing camera systems as there is far too much to consider than just the camera itself.
In my honest opinion the ZV-E1 is different to the GH7 so really hard to choose between the two. GH7 definitely is a work horse with filmmakers and videographers. THe ZV-E1 downfall is just lack of cinema features like the GH7 but the full frame depth of field and sony e does make it super compelling
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema dang now you have me thinking about it again. 🤣
Depending upon your needs, you might want to look at the A7CII as well. I own both ZV-E1 and A7CII. The only reason I keep the ZV-E1 is for 4k 60p and 120p. Otherwise, I always go for the A7CII. I think its image looks much better, even in low light (probably due to oversampling a 33MP sensor versus 12MP). The only downside on the A7CII is the rolling shutter if that's important for your type of shooting.
@@tvid777 Hey man, thanks for chiming in! I updated my comment detailing how I bought a Sony ZV-E1 but returned it, check it out for more context.
The A7C is fine for that I'm doing now but I will definitely look at the A7CII in the future. Thanks for the recommendation!
@@yousefcreative That panning scenario that you mentioned is a problem for me too. I've shot both sony and panasonic for years. Panasonic stabilization for that type of use is exceptional. That one issue almost made me trade in the sony, but panasonic doesn't yet have a small form factor competitor (S9 was interesting but left out a few things I want).
Dude great video! Also just little headsup at 9:55 the left and right movement is because the Boost I.S is ON, you would only use that setting in lock off positions when you want your camera to look like a tripod. Otherwise the results would have been better with it off :) but GREAT video! Love seeing you brand off into the world of Lumix!
Yeah thanks for that. I’ve had a few tell me that haha. I’m a lumix rookie. Amazing to have a chance to use it though
I have a GH6. I don't use the external record option, although I did try it, because I need to use the USB-C to supply power. I shoot live theatre, concerts and dance shows so my run times are pretty long. I bought a 2TB CF Express type B card. I can record 5.7k ProRes to this card while still recording 4k on my Ninja V. For me, because of the type of work I do a deeper depth of field is an advantage.
That’s awesome. Looks like you’ve chose the right tool for the job which is key
There's a new accessory from Panasonic, which is a dummy battery with a USB-C connection called DCC18. It was created to solve this issue, allowing users to power the camera through the dummy battery and leaving the USB port on camera open for the external recording.
@@BrunoMassao I have the dummy battery solution. I use it on my two GH5’s.
Really leaning on GH7 as my permanent B cam. No matter what main camera I have the GH7 is really standing out to be a forever cam. You could make plenty of professional work for years to come and the small form factor makes it nice as a gimbal cam, drone cam or even a travel/street cam. The Fujinon MK18-55 T2.9 and a Lumix prime with leica glass and you're done. I have a ton of sony gear but really think this can fill a lot of gaps my main camera might do, but bigger and heavier. Interesting times we live in. I'm still waiting for the nex FX camera but if it's too pricey or not for me I'm grabbing the GH7.
Yeah a permanent B cam is such a good idea. Mainly because this thing has pretty much everything most people need. The biggest key is lens choices and investing in M43 system
Great Review, the BOOST IS will have "Pan" rejection that why it looks snappy, you can use it when wanting to hold it and lock the camera like handheld tripod mode.
Thanks very much for this nice comparison 👍🏼 useful and helpful your info and opinion.
Its a good approach to always try different systems
Panasonic has been including shutter angle and waveforms in their cams at many different price point since 2017. Protecting your cinema line is no excuse anymore. Get with the program Sony, you are the charging 3k+ for a camera and don’t include these? This is all software. Just stop.
Why are you mad poor guy
@@iyason6878 his comment is about value for money.
Clearly he's a Sony customer that is getting frustrated by the fact that Sony charges more and the customer ends up getting less when compared to the value of the products coming from Panasonic Lumix, who offer more but charge less.
It's a fair, legitimate statement.
If you like this camera you’ll love the s5iix
The S1Hii is going to disrupt the market when it releases
Yes people tell me about this camera all the time haha
The GH7 is a better camera and has way more lenses available at a much cheaper price.
@@michaelbell75 I disagree.
@@michaelbell75mft “leica-panasonic” lenses are expensive af compared to lumix S series lenses …
I wanted the GH7 so bad! I've been running with the GH5 for almost 6 years now and it felt like a great next step... but I shoot real estate with a lot of dark rooms and walking/moving interviews where reliable autofocus would absolutely make my life so much easier. I know I'm going to miss waveforms and that incredible handheld IBIS.
Great review! This camera is wildly underrated, wish I could justify the upgrade. I shoot Sony a7siii and Panny GH6 (usually rigged out with a huuuuge Nikkor 400mm f/3.5 AIS and follow focus) - each system has their own use case. It’s nice to have to be able to pick from the two based on what I’m filming, especially for wildlife.
As an aside, compared to Sony I very much prefer the menu system and overall handling of Lumix. Def subjective tho.
You’re right. Most people write it off because of the sensor size that’s why
ZV-E1 has Sony's old IBIS, with 5 stops of stabilization. You need the A7R V and newer to get 7-8 stops of correction. Looks just like the GH7 and most m4/3 cameras' stabilization at that point.
Thanks for such a practical review on this camera. I absolutely love my GH6s and it is shocking to me how so many people sleep on that camera.
Yeah agreed. The tough thing with people like me as I am heavily invested in Sony we don't tend to look elsewhere if our cameras are doing their job I guess. Plus it means we would need to invest in lenses in that system. It surely opened my eyes wider for other systems that's for sure
Open gate mode is amazing. You can get some relatively inexpensive and good 2x anamorphics that are perfect for this camera.
You helped me with your review thanks dear artist 🎥❤️
Lumix is a good choice for video capabilities at a reasonable price. Also, since they do not make that many models, it leaves more time to cover Sony, so it should not overwhelm you.
M4/3 is definitely advantages in some aspects like wildlife for example, but the DOF is a deal breaker for me as a corporate/event shooter because you can stop down a full frame lens to f16 and get sharp DOF, but you can't open up a M4/3 lens to f1 when you need it.
For instance, a 24-70mm f2.8 lens on full frame is decently shallow for most situations. On a M4/3 sensor, you'd need a 12-35mm f1.4 to give you an equivalent look, which doesn't exist. It's just nice to have the flexibility to be shallow without having to switch to prime lenses in the middle of an event.
Lens choice is the main concern. I do not see any hint Panasonic will release other high end zooms. The last exciting lens Panasonic released was in 2021, the 25-50 f1.7. And if you want the best low light and more shallow dof from a zoom. Your option is still the old way using speedbooster with sigma 18-35 and 50-100 f1.8.
yeah but metabones just released an update which makes their speedbooster work will with gh7 auto-focus, which makes those sigma lenses an amazing option for this camera
Yeah that is tough considering canon and Sony have f1.2 lenses and even after market lenses so a touch faster. Sensor size does play a fairly big role here and Sony e is far more equiped in the lens department
You can always convert any lenses to have great autofocus with a DJI Focus Pro
Lumix best ergonomic for filmmaking use
I would have to agree
Nice overview of the GH7! Just one note, only use the Boost I.S. when you are stationary and want a tripod-looking shot, otherwise, you get that hard adjustment when turning and walking. As a GH5 and G9 owner, I will probably get this or the G9 ii in a few years when the price drops as a B-cam, as I enjoy filming with Micro 4/3. Now that I've increased my photography output, I aim to get an S5ii and a couple of lenses as my new hybrid A-cam.
Yes thanks for letting me know. Yeah I think people getting this camera needs to be invested in m43 glass too
f/1.8 on MFT isn't something like, it's precisely f/3.6 on FF. Aperture being a ratio of focal length to iris diameter, f/3.6 on full frame refers to the same iris diameter. It will match not only depth of field, but also total light gathered. If you want to match your field of view and exposure, you also need to multiply your focal length by 2 and for ISO by 4.
MFT is basically like using a full frame but quadrupling your image noise, all else being equal - with good lighting you won't be able to tell. The IBIS and 32bit float is awesome :)
Most cameras are 16bit audio through their mic jack
Sorry but you are doing the stabilization test wrong. The Boost IS is meant for static shots mimicking tripod. You should turn it off when you are following people!! (I would say boost IS is a terrible and misleading name) Now I own both ZV-E1 and GH7, in my test GH7 is the first camera ever (besides iPhone) to achieve steady cam like "floaty" video. ZVE1 is good at active stabilization but the crop is huge and the image suffers from sudden movement way more often than GH7. There are many reasons why even with all the problems and bulky body, GH6 was still my main camera, not ZVE1. Now with GH7 it's more so.
Yes. I have been told by many. Not sure if you heard but it’s my first lumix camera. Not many people will ever need stability to be like this.
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema Yeah, Lumix cameras are particularly complex. Hope you enjoy it. To me the image stabilization of GH cameras enabled a different workflow similar to how the DJI romin 4D enables. The GH workflow is handheld, rigged up with big screen for manual focus, no gimbal. The ibis and the weight gives you stability while the big screen and direct control makes your composition much more accurate. The Sony way is camera on a gimbal with autofocus, it’s a lot easier to get other benefits like very stable image and no worry about focusing, but you loose precise control, personally i think that’s one of the reasons behind the trend of people swing their Sony camera like crazy for those “dynamic shots”. The great thing about GH7 is those 2 styles of working are no longer mutually exclusive, you can mix and match them now, much more flexible.
Hello... sir,, leica 10-25mm what filter do you used ?
Подходит спортсменка к тренеру:
- я устала, я ухожу
- а в чем проблема? У тебя же все в порядке, очень сильная, скоро чемпионат мира выиграем!
- тренер, да у меня волосы от фармы растут там, где не должны.
- где это?
- на яйцах!
Boost IS is only for when you dont move the camera. It simulates a tripod. Thats why the panning was wobbly.
Just a quick note: the Boost I.S is meant to be used when the camera is still. It's kinda like a "tripod IBIS". In scenes with camera movement Lumix IBIS works best with Boost I.S turned off.
Thanks for that. I did have a commenter mention this to me. Makes sense. I’m a lumix rookie haha
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema No problem, everyone who ever tried a Lumix camera for the first time has did this hahah Glad to see you experimenting with those cameras, they're really good!
I shoot on atomos to get 12 bit apple raw for cinema. What is shutter angle though? Thanks. Great video. Love it
Been a follower in IG for a long time, as a lumix shooter. I guess now I became a YT follower, too LOL.
Haha woohoo. My aim is to just be more real and try explore more filmmaking tools for us to see
I just bought a GH7!
Because the sensor is smaller, 2 x the lenses need to be brighter. 1.8 Full = 0.9 Crop x2 . to have a bouquet like 1.8 full you need a 0.9 lenses in MTF. It's hard to get these lenses but not impossible.
Voightlander have a complete lineup of MFT lenses all in 0.9 10mm 17 mm 25mm 50 mm
Great review
Great video!
Thank you
7:17 You mean Far LESS Depth of Field. 🙂 IMO Wide Focal lengths could use less DOF on MFT but 25mm f1.7 DOF is perfect to me. Of course too tight to include alot of background at those focal lengths.
I’m surprised you didn’t test the new PDAF or the Arri profile
Don't get me wrong I like Lumix but I must stick with sony. Does it have anything to do with sister size well I take that back it does have to do with sensor size. When you are a wedding videographer it is very important. I brother have a camera that is good and low light and the Sony a7s3/fx3 you just can't beat. Yes I know you can film weddings with a lumix I've done plenty of them with it.
Does Sony FX3 come sealed with Sony seal sticker ?
Sensor size matter i guess for relative bokeh, perhaps?
GH7 is a micro four thirds camera on steroids. Totally fitting for the shoot you used it for 😂
It’s pretty stacked with features. I’m shocked how much it has in it
Good review
Thank you very much
is it my monitor or is the GH7 footage pretty heavy in the magenta tones?
In my studio yes. Heavy magenta tones. My A7IV has slightly green tones so my standard LUT I use brings it neutral. I think I just needed more time to grade the image to how I want in the studio
What type of lens would be GREAT on this body for WILDLIFE / BIRDS in flight ?
I’ll keep my mind open, thats how I move from canon to sony. So far I like sony, but good to see the competition
Always good to be open minded about which to choose. Just think about the features you feel like you want but also need
The ff setup gives *less depth of field. You said it backward. Usually, more is better, but it's reversed in this case, lol
Always good to see a Sony boy see what a great Product Panasonic has been making long before SONY came along to Mirrorless! The only thing that HELD Panasonic back was all the hype,about terrible AF "in video modes". However, most REAL FilmMakers came/come from manual focus backgrounds with cameras & lenses, so to most, AF didn't matter. However saying that, with the massive revolution of Content Creators, Vloggers, TH-cam, IG, TikTok, and many more, most didn't know or want to have to worry about focus, whereas with 2nd Gen A series cameras, Sony mirrorless had the best AF on the market, and took center stage for the past 6 years. However, those day are gone. Panasonic will now move into its proper place as one of the top 4 mirrorless camera makers.
Bro pls do video on Lumix s5iix
Potentially. People rave about this camera to me all the time haha. Maybe lumix might start sending me cameras to review
S5iix is not great. Sold mine. Highly disappointed. For photo it was actually amazing.
@@hhankx y wat was the problem wid lumix S5iix bro?
@@Jagendra_vs video is pretty terrible. I’ve actually never seen a good image out of it- if you don’t absolutely nail your white balance. Outdoors it’s ok, indoors it’s really bad. We had all of the pro glass and all
I will say. Photography wise, it’s phenomenal. Video sucks. Pre- amps are the only thing good about video mode on that camera
@@hhankx wow thats interesting, whats your goto color workflow, I haven't had issue but curious to test it.
what about DOF with a speedbooster?
What about grain on low light?
Is there any sd card that writes 3.5gbps? Damn, that quality INTERNALLY?
Gh7 looks great except for the price. Paying more than 1000 for a 4/3 camera is pure idiocy.
Same with the ridiculous pricing on every Sony camera.
In this day and age of smartphones and dji osmo going for 500-1000, there is no reason to spend more than this for 99 percent of buyers who don’t have the skill or talent to take advantage of the bigger sensors.
Just a supreme waste of money.
Pls review the S5IIX especially for grading please?
I will if I get my hands on it
@@JasonMorrisphotocinema thanks. I could never grade my Sony footages compared to the Panasonic. I wonder if you could do a comparison too! Thanks
10:20 - you really don't want to use Boost I.S. with non-static shots
Everybody says that lumix GH7 is the best thing...or big thing... I don´t know the right words... but tht is now...Let´s see tomorrow. 😆😆
certainly no the best but it has some great features for video
Gh7, fx30, a6700 should be 1000 max. Zve10 mark ii should be 650, zve1 should be 1300. Lumix s9 should be 850.
I've always been a Lumix four-thirds user, but at 9:44, the Sony image looks like true cinema, while the Lumix resembles an iPhone image at best. I'm now convinced I won't spend another $0.01 on four-thirds cameras. I might as well go for a previous-gen full-frame Sony.
probably depends on picture style being used?
The image stabilization is much worse on the Sony, but the depth of field and focus are set perfectly on the Sony for that cinematic look. I wonder if there are settings that can be adjusted on the GH7 to achieve the same look as the Sony?
I would get this but my g9m2 is more than enough even with video
No Shutter angle on Sony cameras ? wth
It´s not the camera, it´s the person behind it, what makes the diffrence, but the industry will make us believe something diffrent. Learn how to upgrade your skills and you can work 5-10 years with one camera.
Most of you the think you said already there 3-5 years ago on lots of lumix cam
My s5xii has dual native iso, when i shoot at iso 4000 and compared it to my G9II, i can tell the full frame is waaay waaay cleaner in the midtone and shadow areas, there's no way i'm downgrading to MFT, i regretted my decision, if i really want a downgrade, i can just use my iphone prores raw 😂😂😂😂
The Panasonic GH series had its day in the early 2010s. It’s just a different landscape now and they’re not doing enough to adapt.
DOF and Ibis, sony's still better to me. And you chose the zv-e1. If you go with a combo of a7s3 and stabilizied lens like 24-105 f4 G OSS, you can have a better result. For the price, GH7 is a good camera but is still way behind others from Sony and Canon.
It certainly has a fair few features I’d love to have in my Sony cameras that’s for sure. I must admit full frame cameras are far more forgiving in if you make some mistakes, the sensor can save you a bit
@@JasonMorrisphotocinemaIt is hard to grow past OpenGate, once you've experienced it
Sony is the best! Gh7 plastic image
the image quolity and the colors are so bad.. come on.. you have been paid by panasonic.. look at the charts.. panasonic is losing market shares.. I don't really get their strategy.. it's like they don't want to bother competition... pretty bad .. and they should refund gh owners after gh4 .. that was the last compelling one..
ahahahah so many lies nobody is switching to gh7 and it's a very bad camera.. in a world of full frame.. that is no longer a pro chocie panasonic should concentrate on the S5 instead of prepping out siater gh series.. i own a gh5 and it's by far the worst purchase.. i ever made.. very bad image quality no iso perfomrnace and artifacts.. sometimes very sometimes produces nice images.. but nontheless very low quality i am sure that gh7 is better but still useless for a pro it's a waist of money.. 7SIII by sony is the most compelling one.. period