Modern Soldier vs. Crusader
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- Modernity vs. the Middle Ages.
Music used: “Erik Satie” ➤ • Erik Satie Gymnop...
"Music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio"
#soldier #knight #wojak #crusaders #crusader #medieval #order
#military #catholic #middleages #castle #sigma #sigmarule #chad
![[Live] : ONE 168 วันนี้!! "โจนาธาน vs ซุปเปอร์เล็ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jIN65KgJsI/mqdefault.jpg)
The chad energy was so strong my computer screen cracked in the shape of the cross.
based
yo that sounds so sick
Ur computer is satanic
As an Army soldier I can tell you half the things the soldier said are real.
Yeah pretty much
@@shiftyguggs2415 yup
All of them are real.
Can confirm
As a crusader myself I can tell you most of the things in the video are real, may God bless us all.
Crusaders were just next level. Came from colder places to fighting in scorching heat, heavy burning armor, bare minimum water and supplies, outnumbered, on enemy turf under weak kings at times yet shook the enemies to their core as long as they were breathing. Most modern soldiers are tough but largely unmotivated and don't have a higher purpose especially in the west with their sickening woke adoptions.
Absolutely
But at the end being absolute clusterfudge that destroyed the the Roman Empire.
@@williemherbert1456 ofcourse.. see the pattern. Who ever think they've become superior, end up in a disaster. May it be HRE, Rome, Persia, Britain, ottomans, mongol or anybody.
@@williemherbert1456 To be fair Byzantium was already dying with no real hope of recovery. The crusaders' actions just sped up the process.
@@jessiemeisenheimer8675 No, they could and the reason Crusade being called was for them, and what did they do? Replace them with some obnoxious copy of "Roman Empire" ruled by Latin patriarchate and then Italian, German, and Frankish nobles. Eastern Roma Empire COULD able to survive ruling Anatolia and Balkan in such scenario, although weakened position still able to act decently in being buffer power to neutralize any kind of encroachment by Islamic power. And they shouldn't be like that, speeding up the demise of Byzantine Empire when they fought for the sake of protecting Christendom, then you just acknowledging that they were being bunch of traitorous hypocrite here.
Modern soldier: Has chain of command in case commander of unit dies
Medieval soldier: Our king died! Leg it lads!
😂😂😂😂
Implying the king would go down easily
nah you just pickle him in a barrel
crusaders were the real chads
It’s too bad that only a few of their crusades were legitimate successes. 1st Crusade was the best one though.
Soldier too
@@ivancolonna7520 Don't forget crusades in other parts of the world, such as the teutonic led northern crusades and of course the ones in spain
More like ambitious princelings trying to carve out their own kingdom
@@hellrazor117 Except that those "ambitious princelings" are the reason why you are not having sexual intercourse with a goat and able to type on whatever device you're using.
The crusaders saved you from being under the foot of islamic extremists. Next time you hear about Iran/Iraq/Afghanistan/ or any other shithole remember that they saved you and your ancestors.
Modern soldier: "high state debt means we can't afford good equipment :( "
Crusader: "Wake the fuck up, squire. We have The City to sack"
If thy magical stalf isn't considered good equipment, then what is?
By crusader standard, even the Russians are well equipped.
@@donaldhobson8873 This is a funni state debt joke relating to the fact that the crusaders sacked Constantinople, the seat of Christianity, to pay the debts they took out to go on crusade in the first place
Iranian general would disagree
pillaging is looked down on now and illegal under international law
@@imperialofficer6185"the seat of Christianity" 😂😂😂 how delusional can you be lil bro. Last I checked Byzantium was but a rotting state on the brink of collapse, full of snakes and backstabbers, who hired Latins to fight in their own civil wars to overthrow their rulers, just to then not pay them. And the Latins that sacked Constantinople weren't crusaders, as they had been excommunicated. Meanwhile, Rome, the real seat of Christianity, was guaranteeing the existence and thriving of a thoroughly Christian civilization in Western Europe, which could also unite to confront the foreign Muslims.
The virgin modern soldier fighting for a pittance to earn a meaningless college degree vs the chad crusader knight fighting for pure conviction.
😂😂😂 very funny
Aren't the crusaders more likely to be virgins?
@@awakenow7147thats why they're even more chad
crusaders fought for plunder😭most of them weren’t really doing this for much more than it was a way to make money
@@huntergriffin4907 welp, seems like they needed the funds in order to settle debts
*"The Last Stand" by Sabatons starts playing *
Then the winged hussars arrived!
Fun fact: the flag on his chest is the flag of the kingdom of bosnia
Nope, french fleur de lys
@@seauve742 google the kingdom of bosnia and you will get the results
@@seauve742 it is the bosnian flag. The french comes after, since they used it slightly later, but it became iconic due to France being far more popular. Also the flower icon was used in a lot of flags, but it only stayed in France for the longest, Bosnia aswell.
@@seauve742 Its the banner of the kingdom of Bosnia, it has a diagonal stripe going thru it and the French flag uses it in a pattern with no stripe, the Bosnians still use the pattern on the army flag
@@BOB-ev7fn Interesting news man.
Crusader: fights for God.
Modern soldier: fights for Satan.
Tbh I would rather live now than the middle ages
@why are commies always pro-semite but anti-christ you're right about the modernity part me personally I like the medieval era 476-500ad but living in it would just be hard for me
@why are commies always pro-semite but anti-christ I'm sure you would like dying at 15 to famine or being tortured to death for stealing bread
But killed jew Muslim and Christian
@@drk4753 Boo hoo
Modern warfare isn't fun because what happens is whoever has the biggest missile wins
In medieval wars at least strategy is more playing
Virgin: whoever has the bigger missile wins
Vs
Chad: whoever has the biggest sword wins
@@youraveragetemplar5810 so...the Germans win...they like to use big swords
@@_unknown123. yes
If you mean nuclear missile then, yes (I studied this topic in particular).
Basically nuclear weapons dominates and simplify the strategy of warfare.
Extremely important is having TWO factors: First strike capability(FSC) and Second strike capability(SSC)
The FSC is the ability to inflict a major devastating attack on the enemy (taking out about 25% of population and 50% of industry). The SSC is being able to receive a nuclear attack and strike back.
If a nation has FSC and SSC a lot of problems regarding its national security are solved.
In a conventional war (with no nukes) the outcome is very uncertain. Look at the WW1 German invasion on France, perfect on paper but got bogged down.
In a nuclear war the outcome is certain: unimaginable destruction for all sides involved.
Not necessarily on a ground level (unless we're talking about the mentioned nuclear)
Modern USMC vet I felt this in my soul and I would trade places anyday😂
What percentage would you say were Christian? I ask because 5000 marines held Afghanistan for over 20 years.
Had to be devine intervention.
Crusader: A strong man who fights for God.
The modern soldier: A weak man who fights for a Government that doesn't really care about him.
Sadly there is a lot of truth in that.
as if they cared back then 😂
@@outrider425Rulers back then cared for their men for they shared their hardships and violence
@@Ragnarok__rulers back then didnt give a fuck about their people? you have a couple examples but most of them used them for their own means?
@@Ragnarok__ Exactly, and any king that didnt lead from the front was seen as a b1tch
basically a way of life vs just a job
Yeah for a modern soldier it's a way of life and for a Knight it was just a job
I think there was a historical knight called
“The champion of Christ “
Religious violence was certainly not pleasant, but the loss of purpose felt in our modern times is a problem we shouldn't ignore.
Very true, maybe one of our biggest issues today.
People make so much noise just because crusaders and jihadists fought for their God, way better than fighting for a random oil company
@@Ragnarok__in the end it was utterly meaningless what is the point in fighting for old rich men who face no consequences that’s literally all of human history? in the end they’re both dead what does it matter who or what they fought for either way they killed or got killed for someone who isnt them
i used to be a man who lacked faith and purpose, but after embracing the ways of the drengr and the vikingr mindset. I know id rather die in combat than die at my own hand, because valhall doesnt allow cowards through its gates
Religious violence is as old as humanity
To be fair Im on the side of modern soldiers, they die for nothing except for old men creating a real life chess game. (Most of the time)
While the crusaders had an objective, git mission by god and not some random elders get in their position through lies.
What Im saying is that I respect every soldier out there, be strong, and god save✝️
Violence is never the answer.
It's a question, the answer is yes.
Ah well, both are soldier. They risk fighting anyways with a few differences. And they all die with different purpose, reason and honor. I say, i would respect for these two lads
imagine comparing a drafted man and a noble rich dude who studied war from childhood
What modern draft are you talking about?
Only a quarter of the crusaders (from the first one) were knights and other nobles. The rest were low born mercenaries and volounteer peasants.
Most cursaders were peasants
*the truth here makes this Rough.*
Tfw the drafted boi can one hit kill the armored guy with a single shot from a 7.62 or a .338.
I love how those who make fun of today’s soldiers…didn’t have the guts to join up themselves.
this is not the gotcha moment you think it is
@@Gofaw not a gotcha moment. Just an observation.
Wear full Iron set in summer in Middle East 👍
Byzantine and Roman moment (yes i know Byzantine = Eastern Roman Empire)
If anyone has any doubts as if the modern world is really inferior to the Middle Ages you need only look at the mindset of people from that period and compare that mindset to that of the average western modern individual, medieval documents and letters are generally religious but also very optimistic about their time period in their own lenses, their mindset was that of someone who faced the world with pure faith, courage and strength, meanwhile how do modern works and manner of speech stand in comparison? All we see in the mainstream is nihilism or some manner of Hedonism reminiscent of Epicurean cheap philosophy and mindset! The people who dare stand up in the west are either those of unwavering Christian faith or the rare unbeliever who manages to grasp at the ideal of virtue through some flawed ideal,religion or philosophy like Zen,Taoism,islam, some manner of pure pagan philosophy like early stoicism or even paganism(which is more often then not a road to downfall rather then a road to virtue) on occasion you see the rare Nietzsche or Carl Jung follower courageously struggling with his courage and all his might for that is all he can do! but all of these paths, while useful as philosophys and worthy of study and some manner of respect for their glimpse of paths to the truth, fall short of the Truth present in Christian faith and they can’t see the full picture, they’re like Cicero who had virtue and could perceive morality but didn’t knew the word of the true lord and therefore didn’t had means to be a Christian himself as he was born,lived and died before Christ came and saved mankind with redemption.
Either way the Truth of Christianity remains the same and while many philosophy’s worthy of study exist the one truth of the redeemer remains the same.
cringe military vest (deflates from 1 blow) vs the CHAD full plate armor (turns you into a tank)
youre comparing a gun vs a sword😭
@@huntergriffin4907 yeah, what about it?
they didnt use just swords by the way.
guns can jam in poor conditions of weather, swords and bows dont.
@@OrthoKarterStill, guns and grenades > primitive weapons
Facts still stands
@@OrthoKarterlaughs in AK
@@yuri_0517 guns and grenades are gay and so are you
Missing from Crusader: "I have no idea what 80% of the other crusaders are saying" "Our leaders have stopped the campaign for three months to argue over who is going to rule this empty ruined town." "So hungry, we had to eat the dead of the heathens." "I have every intestinal parasite" "heavy steel armor in the desert was a mistake" "Accidentally sack Christian town because your men got into a fight with the locals over the price of a pair of boots" "Is this Jerusalem? Is this Jerusalem? Is this Jerusalem?"
Soldier : I march barefood .
Me : wow cool yeah 💪💪
Soldier : with peter the hermit
Me: 😮 oh helllll no !
Modern Soldier-Camo
Crusader-Epic Armor
honestly? todays soldiers are sad and displeasured men who want to fight for a cause or for their country yet the scenes of war haunt them or leave them scarred or dismembered for life. on the other hand , soldiers and warriors before they even introduced the musket and firearm were valued not for their simple aim and basic resilience but were actively fighting for something greater with true ferocity and pure skill alone with a sword, bow, axe, spear, shield and etc. and would last hours if not days in a siege fighting with all their physical might and sheer will to go on and on and on. hence why theres a saying; "the warrior with a firearm and cold heart will always pale in comparison to the warrior with a cold steel sword with a blazing soul."
ave maria
Damn don’t say this shit, those soldiers risk their lives everyday so that you can live life freely, this might be a joke but still soldiers are the last people you should make fun of
they really don't, soldiers are nothing but golems used to stir up unnecessary conflict that only the military industrial complex benefits from. keep sipping the kool aid
Tmw our modern boys are not only more fit, better educated and swoler than medieval conscripts but our guns can easily down these yee yee ass Quixotes.
“God fights on the side with artillery.”
-Napoleon “The Sigma Lord” Bonaparte
Now that was spot on! Those who joined the Crusades did it out of love of God and to rid evil from that fanatical abomination.
Islam
Crusader can't shoot 3900 RPM of pure 30mm API ammunition he can only play with his little sword
That because he isn't compensating for anything.
At least Crusaders didn't have PTSD, their own faith protected their high morale.
At least crusaders weren't claiming PTSD from basic training 😂
What's the second song? I read the description but it only credits the author, it doesn't say the song name or video
No Christian ever called me a toxic male
I miss the old honourable ways of fighting too brother. I never liked modern society way of fighting in war.
Why are u disssrespecting vets man ?
It's not disrespecting vets. The military is a joke now
Ah yes, medieval Bosnia, the best crusaders
Fun fact before turks bosnia was Christian
What voice thing did you use?
Apart from the "dairy free" it could be like "is my steak cruelty free ???"
Lab grown soy-meet...
Name of the second?
It only takes me to a channel a so far I haven't found it yet.
true
wasnt the medieval era extremely brutal and cuthroat?
Army of one ☝️
Crusaders were right.
We did right.
And we'll do it again.
This isn't wrong, but it's a generalization. It's wrong to treat everyone of a particular group as the stereotype.
Yeah but it wouldn't be fun othetwise
I hate that he put the name of the piano music. But not the cool metal song.
Bro💀💀💀💀💀
Reject conquistador embrace cruseder
Our purpose comes from God and God alone.
Kunze Overpass
This is real
Nice armor crusader to bad my bulllet soesnt care
Chad medieval knight who fight enemies at little distance, taking risk and seeing the distress and the courage in the enemies' eyes, respecting the enemy and taking some rest when there is a religious feast VS virgin coward modern soldier fighting at distance with drone and gun thinking it's a video game in a dishumanizing war with mass losses, with technologies invented by virgin nerd and ready to act without honor.
Чо за бред...
Not appropriate to post hidden pitfalls and mistakes of the others in ur videos
Soldier
fights for jews
Crusader
fights for jews
Difference?
@@AlexanderJHCope
@@windbuster spiritual jew
Weee
The military: who hates his own country and superiors, recognize his limits, caring about his health and get affected by violence... sounds like a human capable of opinions...
The crusader: who do his commands without hesitation, doesn't care about his own health if it gets in the way of his mission, is capable of fighting on daily basis and.. oh yeah after nailing a living person on wood planks as an agonizing way of torture for some actions, he starts talking with an imperceptible entity and all of this for faith (the belief of something without the need of any kind of proof or argument in your favor)...
It amaze me how religion can bring a person to literally destroy him self physically and psychologicaly for something else who isn't even perceived in any way possible...
>can't even see God
lol, get on my level bro.
Reddit moment.
Guess which person is happier and feels as though life is full of wonder and purpose, and guess which person is likely going to go home and game end himself or adopt alcoholism.
reddit
في مواجهة الفتوحات الاسلامية
Imagine fighting, killing and dying for a fairy tale sky daddy that isn't real and taking orders from a guy who was born into his high position. The Medieval era was so backwards.
Lmao at least in the medieval era you fought for a higher ideal and something greater than yourself, in the modern world you fight for the perpetuation of a hedonistic, materialistic, and degenerate society for the benefit of your corporate overlords. Who's backward really?
Okkk Atheist 🤡
🤓
Y'all know I'm right.
Look, if back then was mainly God and the King, now it's the nation.
Every society has its internal working mechanism, you can't say that the Medieval was backwards because of what a lot a people believed in.
Who knows, maybe people in 200 years from now will call us backwards because we use plastic.
It just isn’t even close.