Thank you sir for your explanation of the objective of rule 52 and rule 53 - one property, but several decree holders - 1 decree holder should not take the entire benefit . I was confused about attachment of decree before but thank you so much for explaining the objective of the rules .
Sir I have not seen any teacher and u- tuber who explains each Section, Order and Rule in such a simple way. I feel as if this subject is made for u. No one can explain this subject better than u. Thank u sir.
Sir . Umeed hai aap theek hongey aur apki walida muhtarma bhi sehatyab hongee . Janab aik misal deydain samjhaney key liye. Order 21 rule 57. DETERMINATION OF ATTACHMENT. where any property has been attached in execution of a decree but by REASON OF THE DECREE-HOLDER'S DEFAULT the court is unable to proceed.... Ismain decree holder kay default ki misal dain kay aesa konsa us seyy default hoga jisper court application ko hee dismiss kerdeygee?
I m from punjab ,We bought a property in 2014 which had some shops the previous owner refused to sell the property so we got a decree through the court and we got a sale deed registry through the court and after that we aply execution for possession. Objections were raised against us by the third party tenants after the application. Which was dismissed from the lower court Even in the sale agreement, the first owner had not mentioned anything about the tenant, but now the tenant has again filed a new case and the possession has been stopped by the court. but by the parties together it was again filed in the district court law according order 21 rule 101 and one tenant remanded against the case by district court and sent to the lower court for evidence. What should be the solution according to your suggestion and such a judgment of the Supreme Court which is in favor of the degree holder so that it can give advantage in lower court and high court.
sir are there any consequences for the breach of rules of order 21 rules 53 & 54? are there any penal consequences for the breach of these orders besides civil consequences? please answer
Sirji, rule 49 (1) when it says, "passed against the partners in the firm as such", does it mean that the partner has got this decree in his individual capacity? Such decree of attachment can be related to anything apart from business of the firm?
After attachment of property if JD didn't comply the decree than court may order to sale the property, inspite of this order sale never become absolute, still jd has opportunity to pay the amount and apply to set aside the sale. But if he don't pay than at the end court confirmed the sale give the absolute right to the purchaser
Bht bari h sir ye kr rhy 2 4 din me ho jaiye gha ... Cpc amendment 2002 me jo hue thora sir us phr nhi kuch banatay ... Or es order me 104 rule se 106 bhi h shayad
Aesa koi teacher ni h ..jisne Cpc ko itte ache s smjhya h...apke karan Cpc interesting lgta h ab..ap to gift ho hr students k lie..ty ....
Wonderful lecture sir....keep continue.....i am from Bangladesh. Indian cpc and BD cpc almost same that we took from British.
Welcome g
Thank you sir for your explanation of the objective of rule 52 and rule 53 - one property, but several decree holders - 1 decree holder should not take the entire benefit . I was confused about attachment of decree before but thank you so much for explaining the objective of the rules .
Best 💯
Nice lecture sir
Ye wala video bhi shandar tha♥️♥️🙏🙏🌹
One of the best teacher nd u-tuber..Hats of u 🙏
Sir I have not seen any teacher and u- tuber who explains each Section, Order and Rule in such a simple way. I feel as if this subject is made for u. No one can explain this subject better than u. Thank u sir.
Thank you g
U r most welcome sir.
Really sir...I was not clear with rule 50 because everyone would skip it n ...But ur way of teaching is very nice...
Welcome g
Sir aapka bahot abhaar rahega 🙏
All my duty
Thankyou sir, I finally understood rule 53.
Jabardast sir
Rule 53 very well explained 👍
Thank you so much, sir. :) Now I am able to understand Rule 53 in a lucid manner along with other rules. Thanks a lot.
lecture te bhut vadia sir ,, bus thoda slow te saaf bolya kro
Thanks sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏,,,,ur priceless effort,,,,, excellent
Your explanation is toooooooooo good😘😘
Thank you sir ji.....ur way to explain law is speechless......🙏🙏🙏🙏cpc ke bad TPA pr lecture banana please.....requested to u
btw ur lectures are the bestt .. thnkyu so much sir👌❤
Thanku so much sir for ur lectures
Really appreciable work 🙏
Bahut hi Badiya Sir....Kindly please upload specific relief act and Maharashtra rent control act
Check the playlist, I have already completed SRA
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827ok Sir....Shukriya
Sir ji ap cpc se related case study b kreaye mashallah lectures out class
🙏🙏🙏🙏
Nice explanation
You are great sir , love u sir
Nice lecture
12.30 Attachment of Decree
Sir .
Umeed hai aap theek hongey aur apki walida muhtarma bhi sehatyab hongee .
Janab aik misal deydain samjhaney key liye.
Order 21 rule 57. DETERMINATION OF ATTACHMENT.
where any property has been attached in execution of a decree but by REASON OF THE DECREE-HOLDER'S DEFAULT the court is unable to proceed....
Ismain decree holder kay default ki misal dain kay aesa konsa us seyy default hoga jisper court application ko hee dismiss kerdeygee?
Like if decree holder fails to pay the execution fees, and dont give the ryt picture of the property which is to be attached
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank u sir. I have completed approximately 70 lectures of cpc.
👌
nice sirji please continue
I m from punjab ,We bought a property in 2014 which had some shops the previous owner refused to sell the property so we got a decree through the court and we got a sale deed registry through the court and after that we aply execution for possession. Objections were raised against us by the third party tenants after the application. Which was dismissed from the lower court Even in the sale agreement, the first owner had not mentioned anything about the tenant, but now the tenant has again filed a new case and the possession has been stopped by the court. but by the parties together it was again filed in the district court law according order 21 rule 101 and one tenant remanded against the case by district court and sent to the lower court for evidence. What should be the solution according to your suggestion and such a judgment of the Supreme Court which is in favor of the degree holder so that it can give advantage in lower court and high court.
i think you have misinterpreted Rule 53
sir are there any consequences for the breach of rules of order 21 rules 53 & 54? are there any penal consequences for the breach of these orders besides civil consequences? please answer
Sirji, rule 49 (1) when it says, "passed against the partners in the firm as such", does it mean that the partner has got this decree in his individual capacity?
Such decree of attachment can be related to anything apart from business of the firm?
As such means acting under the capacity as a partner., Firm is not liable for the liability of partner in his individual capacity not as a partner
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thank you sirji🙏🙏
So lenthy order
Hahahahaha
Plz start TPA
sir section58 ka sub clause (4) and (5) clear nhi hua
sir what is the difference between ' court order of sale' & court order ' confirming the sale'. please answer
After attachment of property if JD didn't comply the decree than court may order to sale the property, inspite of this order sale never become absolute, still jd has opportunity to pay the amount and apply to set aside the sale. But if he don't pay than at the end court confirmed the sale give the absolute right to the purchaser
Sir if Court think objection or claim unnecessary delay proceeding..then I can file separate suit as per order 21 Rule 58
this order 21 is like add of ambuja cement, ye diwar tutti kyo nhi same as ye order khatam hota kyo nhi 🤣
Bht bari h sir ye kr rhy 2 4 din me ho jaiye gha ... Cpc amendment 2002 me jo hue thora sir us phr nhi kuch banatay ... Or es order me 104 rule se 106 bhi h shayad