Square-0, Square-1, Square-2...!?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 มิ.ย. 2024
- I check out ShengShou's new lineup of Square-1 variations, each of which has a fun & unique solve!
Buy the Square-0 here ($16): www.thecubicle.com/products/s...
Buy the Square-1 here ($11): www.thecubicle.com/products/s...
Buy the Square-2 here ($16): www.thecubicle.com/products/s...
DG Cubes' Original Square-0: • New Mod - Square Zero!
2x2x3 Tutorial: • How to Solve the 2x2x3...
Use discount code "z3cubing" for 5% off everything at TheCubicle.com! www.thecubicle.com/?p=HJMGVPebP (Affiliate Link/Code)
Outro Music: "Ruby" by Jim Yosef and Alex Skrindo [NCS Release]
• Jim Yosef & Alex Skrin...
Merch: teespring.com/stores/Z3Cubing
0:00 - Intro
0:36 - Square-2
2:30 - Square-1
3:37 - Square-0
4:47 - Square-0 Solve
6:00 - Square-2 Solve
9:21 - Pricing & Conclusion
#RubiksCube #cubing #Z3Cubing - บันเทิง
![พาแม่บินครั้งแรก..เกือบวูบ! ให้เกาหลีเยียวยาใจ I Korea Ep.1 [Seoul] x อุงเอิง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/waL3__dEQBU/mqdefault.jpg)
I want to see a square-3 now
The square 3 isn’t even going to be a square anymore, it’s going to be a sphere lol
Square for two
What about a Square-1½?
No, just no
God please no
Next up: Square-3
Narrow the corners, widen the edges and split the edges into two.
- Just a thought
Or (like they did with the corners on the top and bottom layers) slice moves on the edge of the middle layer.
nah square--1 (negative 1) will be better
@@lukasjetu9776square+1
Imaginary cube
Better Square+1 lol
If I had a square-2, the first approach I would try to solve it with would be pretty different actually. I think I'd notice pretty early on that the edge pieces and the "half-corner" pieces are the same. So what I'd do is skip cubeshape entirely (because it's no longer a separate "shape" of the puzzle, it's more like just an arbitrary set of positions that happens to contain the solved position), and try to use a similar method to the 2x2x3: first orient everything, then permute everything.
I know that's how I'd do it, because I tend to use comutators, and had already figured out the combos to solve the square-2 shortly after it came out of the box.
…honestly, it's kinda frustrating - I've got thirty-something different types of rubiksoids, and it's got to the point that I can either get a puzzle that quickly becomes a trivial set of comutators, or I can get a puzzle that shape-shifts and bandages and I can't figure it out.
As a person who has dementia, I can’t become a cuber.
@@olivesttree oof man that must be rough
That’s kinda dumb. It’d be REALLY hard to permute all the pieces, and I tried with my own square-2. You’d have to use a million commutators to do that and it’s a hundred times easier to just reduce it to a square-1 and then solving it like that.
I’ve always wanted to try a square 4
same
Same
Although square-5 😉
rookie mistake: try a square 4
Hi kewbix
Interestingly, as a designer, these are one of the first puzzles that I thought about. One of the very first 3D-printed puzzles I designer was a square-4. The interesting for all Square-n puzzles is one of the simplest ones to understand and build, which is why this is a good starting point for anyone interested in puzzle design. Most square-1 mechanisms are sturdy enough to even allow for a handmod of literally sawing the pieces in half to create a fully functional Square-2. The logical continuation of a square-2 is a puzzle with 16 pieces per layer, a square-4 has 20 pieces per layer and so on.
For the solving, the square-1 should be the hardest one by far. You can just line up the small slices of a square-2 piece by piece instead of reducing it to a square-1 which essentially is a bandaged square-2. To me that's also why the sq-1 doesn't appeal to me that much solve-wise. It is extremely difficult to find a solution due to the blocking. The puzzle that has not been mass produced so far but should is a square-equal (a square-1 with 8 pieces of the same size) which is the bigger brother of the square-0 and the smaller one of a square-2. :)
No one is gonna read that... I almost passed out doing it
Dude, the fact that i come back every year to watch the pi video means you are incredible. Keep up the good work!!
That's very good 'corner cutting'.
When I first got into cubing in middle school, my pe coach gave me a square 2 and asked if I could solve it, I said maybe and tried and figured it out after a few days
1:32 You can also change the color scheme on a 4x4 Fisher Cube. Also the corner twisting Dino cube can do it as well. That's so cool that the Square 2 can do that. I love my 2x2x3. I have a banana puzzle that functions like that. It's so cool that the Square 0 is the same puzzle. I got to get one now! Then I will have three 2x2x3's. 😁
I can do a color swap on the Windmill cube
@@JosiahFickinger No You Can't.
@@masteryoshi7121 My bad. I hadn't watched the video in a week. I meant that you can change the CS on a windmill cube by taking it apart and swapping adjacent colors.
@@JosiahFickinger well then you can pretty much do that with almost any stickerless puzzle. But I was talking about puzzles where you don't have to do that.
@@masteryoshi7121 Except Stickerless aren't that easy. Yeah 👍
Nice! There are certain non WCA puzzles I wish were produced in stickerless and not stickered.
Like the pentaminx💀
@@FizzleWizzleVR Yeah. And some of the lanlan puzzles like the curvy copter and jumbly clover cubes
@@JosiahFickinger man the 33x33 looking sad
Stickerless and not stickered
You know there’s square 3 . It’s like on one side it’s square 1 and on second it’s square 2
I think these puzzles would be fun as an official wca puzzle
SQ 0 basically a 2x2 as a 3x3, SQ 1 a 3x3 with twists, a SQ 2 a cuboid squeezed into a cube shape
if a pyraminx isnt in wca, square 2 has no chance
@@watchf bro
@@watchfbut it is?
@@alixx_legenddark_xx2819 don’t know what I was thinking
Square -1:
The top and bottom are fully flat with 1 slice layer at an angle through the middle, and the middle of the cube instead of being your main slicer, now has different parts and shapes. I feel like it would be pretty easy but fun to figure out
The reason the sq0 have magnet like a sq1 is because they have the same core. they made it possible to swap pieces with the other two puzzle a (sq1 and sq2) and make some strange new fused puzzle.
i just bought a sq-2 and TWO videos from big cubing channels about it come out? incredible.
Tbh might buy the square-0
Haha those cubes look so cool! I've heard of the square 2, but I've never heard of the sqaure 0
I can’t believe how people solve these, you are special 😂
I ordered the square 0 a couple days ago I’ve been waiting for a video like this
Now buy the square -3
@@rainekrizztovsantacera9892 aye aye captain
OK now this is cool. So much variety
Ooo, I wanted to do a vid with all 3 also. Beat me to it
Edit: If you solve the corners into the appropriate color scheme BEFORE doing cubeshape, that’ll make things easier down the line. I did a vid on Calvin’s SQ2 a while back
Nice vid z3!
“I have never seen any puzzles like this before”
The square-1 he put off screen: “am I a joke to you?”
I think the way you solved the square 2 is the best casual way to do it
Geez this guy deserves more subscribers
It's interesting that the sq-2 is only (seemingly) marginally more challenging than the sq-1, like, assuming you can solve the sq-1, you could figure out the sq-2 pretty easily, which I don't think could be said for the difference between say a 3x3 and a 4x4
As someone who has both, the sq2 is WAY harder than the sq1
Moving from 3x3 to 4x4 introduce parity problems which makes the solution more complicated but SQ1 and SQ2 has the similar parity problem so the complexity is about the same. Generally twisty puzzle is group into parity and no parity class of puzzle and parity puzzles are generally more complicated.
would love dg to come back and see him review the square 0
He's sometimes active on the Forum
you should try the floppy super square-4, you can get it from Chewie's custom puzzles for 35$
Alternate title: ShengShou's Super Square-1 Swarm
I'd love it if you could do a more in depth tutorial on how to solve the Square-2
Funny to see your synchronisation with our friend jperm
For the Square-2 My approach has always been to match up the corner halves and then solve it like a normal Square-1.
I cant wait for square-square
Everytime he said "trivial" and "super easy", another slice of my trivial soul died, while my brain imploded simultaneously.
Something I would be confused with is if there would be new notation for the half corners. My thought was this example
(-2, 5 1/2) / (6, -4). I think that would be a challenge! Love your vids!
for sq1 a corner is 2 so for sq2 it would be te same
As someone who had never seen a sq1 alg written/spoken out, that hit me like a freight train
My first solve was on a 1x2x3 polar bear. You can count the permutations. Easiest solve of my life.
Amazing video
aww yea time to see it
I remember making a Square-2 by cutting the corner pieces of some cheap stickerless Square-1 in half. It actually worked lol.
Did this on an MGC because it turns so badly and I wanted a speedsolvable Sq-2
Hi Josiah
@@JosiahFickinger Hi Josiah
I love how z3 cubings intro is short
Everybody gangsta 'till some crazy cube company maks a Square--1 and Square-3
Bro he read my mind with the square 0 reaction.
Happy Halloween
Bravo
i still remeber when your channel was called Legoboyz3 and now you removed the Legoboy and added cubing in front of it XD
YOO AT 2:31 You see his watch tanline lol
Shengsho made the Square-0 from dg cubes omg
Wait till the square -1 comes out
You should try the Diansheng magnetic 8x8 and 9x8, I heard they're not bad
i got the diansheng 7x7
cant wait for the sq- -1
imagine being in a rubiks cube competition with square 2 and you get it in a second or something and then the person says "wrong color scheme -6 seconds"
Would love to see a Square -1
Square-3 coming soon?
NOOOOOOOOO
@@heystopthatnow maybe square 2.5?
@@al_cuber square 6.9
@@khachuli 7.7?
What will sheng shou add to the new one
oh man can't wait for the Square-minus 1
can't wait for them to make the square-negative
My thought was before doing cube shape just do corner pairing like a 4x4 fisher cube then solve like a normal sq-1
Ignore the squares. Lets talk about how he did no intro
I have just learned how to solve the 2x2x3 so I know how to solve the Square-0 because you said the Square-0 solves like a 2x2x3 (i don't know if that's the word).
what are the algorithms for flipping colors on square-2
corner cutting taken literally
I want to learn square-1, which do you recommend?
game theory style thumbnail lmao
Podes hacer un video sobre como montar y desmontar el cubo polaris?
Square-2 can easily be solved in 3 steps:
1. solve half a layer
2. solve half a layer on the other side, then put the 2 together (the two half layers should be both white or both yellow)
3. solve the last layer with commutators (J Perm has a tutorial, or just check his square-2 video)
I know this is not the best, but it is easy for people who don't have square-1 knoweledge.
I watched this last week and I got the sq-2 immediately
one time i dreamed about a "square-H" lol
Now I want to see a Square--1.
Time for the square -1
Let's see a square-9 trillion now!
Hello I watched your videos like 4 years ago when you were called legoboyz3
Where do I get a Square 0?! I want one
yes
2069 be like: So we will like to like to announce drum roll please, a sq 69!
Who will make a Square-3 first? Shengshou or Z3?
I wish for a square-negative-1
now introducing the Square -1
0:38 square 2 , 2:30 square 1 , 3:38 square 0 , is a all square
gonna make a square-3 and a square+1
the ultimate way to end a sentence ...!?
I was literally just talking to my brother about the square series
I'd like to see a square-1 that could also cut in the blue and green sides.
It wouldn't really solve much different, but that's a really cool idea!
@@Z3Cubing sometimes it's just the novelty
You taught me how to solve a square-1
why did the square-1 at the start have black instead of yellow?
Nice yooo
you start with the sq-2 but you can switch the caps so it becomes a 1 or 0
Whoever made the square 2 took corner cutting too seriously
I'm thinking 🤔 how will be the the sq-3 , sq-4 and so on ?
SQ-infinite
sq-0 should be a WCA cube
Sengso at the top of their game
I probably cant even solve a square negative 1 if it exists
you should make a square-(-1) that’s just a cubic 1x1x3
oo!
Is a square two just the 4x4 of the square cubes? That sounds insanse.
Nice puzzzles! My son got SQ-2😊
shengshou just does magnetics non wcas now lol
I want to see the square root now
Square -1 next
Bro imagine them making a circle-1
Z3 Cubing made a Square-1 Barrel, which is essentially just a Circle-1
Maybe circle-1 will be a ball version of square-1
The mirror blocks can shape shift !!!???
And it's a WCA event !!!!????
Square 2 looks like a minecraft tnt block
Cool cool… now make square -1