I feel like the only reason lactoid gives the court so much credence is because they have a Republican super majority. If it was a 6-3 liberal court, and the dem had done Trump things he wouldn’t be making this same argument. My argument would be the same though.
Lactoid needs a better calculator. Econoboi did very well, but I wish he'd brought up MAGA mobs harassing poll workers and efforts by Republicans to to remove as many democrats from the voter rolls as possible.
I feel like Whicks playing the both sides angle is a tad bit frustrating. It makes me think liberals need to be more extreme because saying certain behaviors are okay on the right or that the left is even close to equal is beyond ridiculous. That’s just my opinion of course
Do you think it's good to "NOT teach people how to think for themselves or to NOT double check lies in the mainstream media?" Must have pretty low regard for those people if you think you have to convince them of lies to even vote for your candidates.
The lactose guy keeps repeating the same things over and over and over again in the same segment. He has one point that he’s seen on Twitter and just tries to make it sounds like he has an entire treatise by slightly changing the wording.
The whatabout check on a double standard is fine. But not when it's used as a deflection to avoid answering a direct question. Imagine you were in a court and someone asks you a direct question. It would be a dodge to answer with... What about that guy? How come you aren't asking him. Just acknowledge the answer, and then you can ask a counter question about the other side.
@@SpacemanStudies what are you talking about, I'm still waiting for the day that I will want to vote for another Democrat. But they don't get my vote for free. Maybe once they go back to reporting on factual events in the news. And once they stop trying to remove the bill of rights. Centrist just means you hold positions from both sides. And are still willing to vote for either side. The Republicans don't earn my down ballot vote either. So they can keep fighting each other over how bad the Democrat policy is. It's still a whataboutism to purposely never answer a directed question. Many times in a debate I'll ask... Is that bad thing? or is that a good thing? Or I'll ask... What could they do better to fix, blah blah blah. Since online left wingers are obsessed with never pointing to a solution as a policy. So the best you can do is ask them how who and who can do better with insert agreed upon problem...
Absolute clown behavior from Lactoid who literally explains the democratic process for not electing a “chosen candidate”AKA not voting for said candidate in the election 54:06 I have to choose to believe Lactoid is purposefully lying that he believes Kamala is a bigger threat to democracy at this point in the debate.
2:40:00 FACTS. This is all entertainment and drama farming at the end of the day. The people who profit are laughing all the way to the bank (and their bunkers they have built in case shit really hits the fan). Late stage capitalism
The nerve of calling Joe Biden being pressured to step down a "coup" is wild...
Lactoid: “Trump isn’t a threat to democracy because I agree with his policies”
Great from econoboi
Econoboi for the win!!!
I feel like the only reason lactoid gives the court so much credence is because they have a Republican super majority. If it was a 6-3 liberal court, and the dem had done Trump things he wouldn’t be making this same argument. My argument would be the same though.
Lactoid needs a better calculator. Econoboi did very well, but I wish he'd brought up MAGA mobs harassing poll workers and efforts by Republicans to to remove as many democrats from the voter rolls as possible.
I feel like Whicks playing the both sides angle is a tad bit frustrating. It makes me think liberals need to be more extreme because saying certain behaviors are okay on the right or that the left is even close to equal is beyond ridiculous. That’s just my opinion of course
Do you think it's good to "NOT teach people how to think for themselves or to NOT double check lies in the mainstream media?"
Must have pretty low regard for those people if you think you have to convince them of lies to even vote for your candidates.
Yup, false equivalencies, and grading on a curve, needs to stop.
The lactose guy keeps repeating the same things over and over and over again in the same segment. He has one point that he’s seen on Twitter and just tries to make it sounds like he has an entire treatise by slightly changing the wording.
"I bet it was a DGG'er""
"Nah, he was outside."
Lmao. W.
Absolutely insufferable concern trolling by Lactoid.
Econoboi: Based D-pep Zero Drinker
I'm actually okay with responding to criticism of Harris with "but what about Trump" when it is an election year.
The whatabout check on a double standard is fine. But not when it's used as a deflection to avoid answering a direct question.
Imagine you were in a court and someone asks you a direct question. It would be a dodge to answer with... What about that guy? How come you aren't asking him.
Just acknowledge the answer, and then you can ask a counter question about the other side.
@@AKABattousai 1. This is not court 2. Anyone still claiming to be a centrist would be shitting in the mouth of the judge if this was court
@@SpacemanStudies what are you talking about, I'm still waiting for the day that I will want to vote for another Democrat. But they don't get my vote for free.
Maybe once they go back to reporting on factual events in the news. And once they stop trying to remove the bill of rights. Centrist just means you hold positions from both sides. And are still willing to vote for either side.
The Republicans don't earn my down ballot vote either. So they can keep fighting each other over how bad the Democrat policy is.
It's still a whataboutism to purposely never answer a directed question.
Many times in a debate I'll ask... Is that bad thing? or is that a good thing?
Or I'll ask... What could they do better to fix, blah blah blah.
Since online left wingers are obsessed with never pointing to a solution as a policy.
So the best you can do is ask them how who and who can do better with insert agreed upon problem...
@@SpacemanStudies the other thing I ask people in a political argument is:
Is that a good or a bad thing? And Is that an opinion, or a fact?
Guys, you don't understand. That well-thought out and rational argument you've made has ALREADY been factored into his calculation. So you lose 🙂
I missed where Trump was shot at again? He wasn't, so why title it this way?
Whick might have reading comprehension issues.
Absolute clown behavior from Lactoid who literally explains the democratic process for not electing a “chosen candidate”AKA not voting for said candidate in the election 54:06
I have to choose to believe Lactoid is purposefully lying that he believes Kamala is a bigger threat to democracy at this point in the debate.
2:40:00 FACTS. This is all entertainment and drama farming at the end of the day. The people who profit are laughing all the way to the bank (and their bunkers they have built in case shit really hits the fan). Late stage capitalism
Most normies watch FOX or MSNBC. My dad thinks like this. The mainstream media is very good at pushing normies to the extremes