Just some random N1 facts that you could incorporate next time. The real n1 they landed an unmanned lander near the landing site of the manned landing site in case anything went wrong they could walk to another lander. The lander also had secret backup engines in case of failure. There was also a plan to have a massive aero spike on the first stage. They did build a 2 man lander that had a higher payload capacity.
I found that to make it more accurate you can use two fairings for the fist and second stages. Use the top one to make the rounded top and the second one to make the rest of the skirt then clip them inside each other to make it look smooth.
All right, few things. The 7k lunar Soyuz had no solar panels. I think they've used fuel cells. Those open interstage sections were supposed used for hotstaging, just like on the R-7 family. Also you could've used actual fins instead of struts on those gridfins. In the real N-1 only the six engines in the middle were gimbaling. One idea for that is using vectors and limiting their thrust to 20-25%
Hmm, good job! NeCeSsArY CrItiSCmS: Why are there solar panels on the LOK Soyuz? There ain't solar panels on the LOK. Good job on the Soyuz form factor, though. I've always used fairing to get the capsule shape (If you perhaps remember my N1 from that kursed 12-hour stream), and I'd never thought of using radiators to get the shape. Also- that there docking port is too large. I'd a go for the junior sized port, as they were designed to be sorta like the LOK/LK docking ports, as they're ridiculously small and it makes more sense for a Kerbal to EVA between the craft, like the LOK/LK. Overall- I'd say you did pretty good! Much better than Matt Lowne's attempt tbh if you remember that unsightly object.
It’s a perk sometimes, depends on what the video is about. Would be less than great if you made a tutorial and then didn’t let people use the finished product
Piolet the 7k-lok (i believe thats the name of the moon soyuz) didnt have solar panels, they were too heavy. Just like the americans they used those other electricity things
your LK lander is totally wrong. There should be attitude control engines on the top of the craft, and there are no weird cylindrical fuel tanks and other crap at the sides like you have, and the landing platform can separate just like the LEM. (though the Lk used a single engine for both descent and ascent)
![[Live สด] การออกรางวัลสลากกินแบ่งรัฐบาล งวดวันที่ 1 กรกฎาคม 2567](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/o6JPYXalcXU/mqdefault.jpg)
Just some random N1 facts that you could incorporate next time. The real n1 they landed an unmanned lander near the landing site of the manned landing site in case anything went wrong they could walk to another lander. The lander also had secret backup engines in case of failure. There was also a plan to have a massive aero spike on the first stage. They did build a 2 man lander that had a higher payload capacity.
and the n1 souyuz does not have solar panels lol, that was a dumb mistake on mine
@@Piolet1549 what did it use for power then? Fuel cells I assume?
Piolet is the kind of guy to radially mount a standard decoupler instead of using a radial decoupler.....
Lol
Lol
Lol
Lol
Lol
Biggest non-nuclear explosion ever, I love rockets!
ye
You can push F, and it'll turn the offset to local, which is relative to the rotation of the part. Very helpful for Falcon 9s.
thanks
Superb job mate, you really captured the look of the N1 to a tee.
Tbh Ur channel blew up I'm happy to support u :)
Remember when he did the 1k special...
@@greenkerbal632 yeah i know that that was cool tbh like the the craft is blown my mind it's so big in real life that needs a long long runway lol
thanks :)
Lol too bad this was posted while I was sleeping but I’m here
Me too
F
rip I don’t have any of the dlcs
Just use steam. Unlocked. Net to get ksp 1.11.1 with dlcs for free
@@dranand75 don't pirate
@@Arae_1 oh sorry I admit my mistake
INVEST
@@dranand75 great way to get hunted down by the USCO
SN15 IS IMPRESSED
Me: Ooooh this is gonna be fun to launch!
Waterfall taking me to 1 FPS because the plumes are so detailed: Oh I don't think so.
I found that to make it more accurate you can use two fairings for the fist and second stages. Use the top one to make the rounded top and the second one to make the rest of the skirt then clip them inside each other to make it look smooth.
It is perfect
i will only use this for the rest of my ksp life
:)
Suprrrrior
I think you should use a faring instead of the radiators.
Great content and continue to be awesome
All right, few things. The 7k lunar Soyuz had no solar panels. I think they've used fuel cells.
Those open interstage sections were supposed used for hotstaging, just like on the R-7 family.
Also you could've used actual fins instead of struts on those gridfins. In the real N-1 only the six engines in the middle were gimbaling. One idea for that is using vectors and limiting their thrust to 20-25%
piolet, cool guy
i recommend you take a look to editor controls on the options, you can learn some useful thing that can help you when building ships
I should
Thanks you!
Do we know when the next interstellar episode is coming
Hmm, good job! NeCeSsArY CrItiSCmS: Why are there solar panels on the LOK Soyuz? There ain't solar panels on the LOK. Good job on the Soyuz form factor, though. I've always used fairing to get the capsule shape (If you perhaps remember my N1 from that kursed 12-hour stream), and I'd never thought of using radiators to get the shape. Also- that there docking port is too large. I'd a go for the junior sized port, as they were designed to be sorta like the LOK/LK docking ports, as they're ridiculously small and it makes more sense for a Kerbal to EVA between the craft, like the LOK/LK. Overall- I'd say you did pretty good! Much better than Matt Lowne's attempt tbh if you remember that unsightly object.
Good
You can make it more accurate if you just are clips the module the small little model in block D on the top just close the fairing with it
i love this channel #betterthenlowne
matt lame XD
Very realistic. I can't get a kilometer from the launchpad before exploding lol
Who else watches these tutorial videos only for entertainment?🚀
I do
I bet a lot of people do lol
If I were you, I’d use a Vector engine.
Also, about the Verniors, it’s because they are “stowed” by the fairing.
I normally use 2 or 3 slowdown thrusters, and use a fairing for the descent module
@starhopper when me and gamer pro where editing the video we cut the section out when he used 6 because it crashed
@@Piolet-sm9cq neither of you are his editors :/
@@Piolet-sm9cq see you changed ur name
@@gamerpro4765 you're not his editor, you're just an 8 year old that wants to feel important. As for the other person, they're probably just your alt
THIS IS THE FIRST TIME piolet uploaded craft files
it looks alot like the space shuttle fuel tank but with some fire blasters on the bottom
does it really
honestly, yes
stalin is proud
Annoying question, but how many parts is this?
Why did you start with the orbital module?
Hi dad...
@@fallofboots WHAT'S UP
Wow wait the public i taught its a perk (i mean u give the craft file only on members) lol ..... Good video btw :)
It’s a perk sometimes, depends on what the video is about. Would be less than great if you made a tutorial and then didn’t let people use the finished product
for tutorials I'm gonna give everyone the craft
Tbh, i think it's better to use terrier instead of spark.
How do you turn parts below 90 degrees only with the keyboard?
q and e usually work. if not, a d w s will do it
@piolet1549 can you do a fully stick falcon 9 tutorial ?
at some point
just telling you that if there is twr problems, i don’t drain fuel, but add engines or remove fuel tanks
That is the kerbal approach
@@Arae_1 yeah
Fastest growing channels.
1 Piolet
2 Dream
I wish lol
Video idea:helicopter banana to laythe
interesting lol
I dare you to put mastodon engines on the bottom just to see how fast it goes
It would probably have a TWR of like 3 and burn for ~30 secs lol
@@Piolet1549 true XD
The Soyuz spacecraft that was used had no solar panels
Nice. Rip people without DLC tho
The second oscar-b fuel tank won't snap to the first one in my game
Piolet the 7k-lok (i believe thats the name of the moon soyuz) didnt have solar panels, they were too heavy. Just like the americans they used those other electricity things
Fuel cells which thankfully we have in stock ksp :)
Shadow zone be like oh no he hates me
lol
Not to brag but i was this guys 35 subscriber
nightmare to build
i downloaded the craft file but before i open ksp i edited the files of the Block A engines and have *A STRONG AMOUNT OF THRUST*
your LK lander is totally wrong.
There should be attitude control engines on the top of the craft, and there are no weird cylindrical fuel tanks and other crap at the sides like you have, and the landing platform can separate just like the LEM. (though the Lk used a single engine for both descent and ascent)
N1 is the most kerbal rocket ever built
(More boosters)Больше бустеров
YES I WAS TRYING TO MAKE A SOYUZ
noice
Him. The n1 has thirty engins on its first stage
Me whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat
LK doesnt mean lunar kraft but lunniy korabl
makes sense thx
why upload at 1am?
3 am for me lmao
T I M E Z O N E S
It's 7pm for me
Why be awake at 1am
@@Arae_1 you are close to me, I'm scared
5pm for me
Where sfs stream
But the Soyuz from Soviet moon program was without electric panels!
We know. The 7K had no Solar Panels.
POGGERS
ALWAYS SOVIET FLAG
TODAY RANDOM FLAG
yes comrade'
@Peter Seddon was it really nessasary?to say that
No.
LM aka Apollo Lander uses 2 staged with 2 engines.
I thought he said that the Russian one had one engine, not the American one
agree
Do a Saturn five tutorial
soon (ish)
@@Piolet1549 thank you
@@Piolet1549 your vids are cool also how do you make these creations without crashing your game?
3 months later...
And can you plssss make it available on google drive or mideafire or kerbal x plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz please please
Its a 5 stage rocket
yeah
hi
hi
I use silver instead of gray and orange
My N1 is unstable
It had 999 Views I Joined and It got 1k views
Pog
E P I C
For me, it just rotated and used fuel from other stages
well thats not good
@@Piolet1549 it indeed is not good
Use a regular decouple and don’t just rely on the engine plat, that’s has worked for me.
Day 24 of asking Piolet to play Roblox: Titan V Launches Today Edition
no
@@antonwestergaard5211 yes
maybe
@@Piolet1549 It did launch yesterday B)
У н 1 не было солнечных панелей
If I Wasnt Poor I Would Donate 10 Bucks And Become A Member
The amount of times he said N1
👇
stfu beggar
I didn't like the video so it would stay at 69 likes but enjoyed
third
Yes, but never make a comment like this again
@@Arae_1 I'll do it again
coolz
1st
Yup, but never make a comment like this again
Have your fun, but remember it's not a race and no one cares :)
3rd
4
no, un third
@@david_eldios_ no in third
@@kyle.saikiulee7431 no, you're fourth, sort comments by newest, then scroll to the bottom
N1 is not moon rocket😐
Actually umm it is.
It's a cancelled design that kept blowing up.
Its a boom rocket
Yeah it is, designed to do what Saturn V did
3rd
5
no, i'm third